Connect with us

An Introduction To Rebalancing

An Introduction To Rebalancing

Published

on

In the world of investing, rebalancing refers to the process of adjusting assets in one’s portfolio in order to maintain a certain level of risk and the desired asset allocation. Rebalancing seeks to keep investors on track to reach their overall investment goals.

Get The Full Ray Dalio Series in PDF

Get the entire 10-part series on Ray Dalio in PDF. Save it to your desktop, read it on your tablet, or email to your colleagues

Q3 2020 hedge fund letters, conferences and more

Portfolio rebalancing has endured the test of time as a key component of any investor’s long-term investment plan. However, it is generally accepted at face-value and many investors are unsure of the underlying logic behind rebalancing.

  • Is the goal to increase returns, reduce risk, or perhaps some combination of the two?
  • When is it appropriate to rebalance?

While the answers may not be immediately obvious, in this piece we hope to clarify several of the key points as to why rebalancing is an integral part of any financial plan.

There are two overarching reasons why rebalancing is so important:

  1. Rebalancing Your Portfolio Helps Manage Risk

One of the key tenets behind asset allocation is the concept that not all asset classes move in the same direction at the same time. A well-diversified portfolio is crucial, as it helps to mitigate volatility according to an investor’s predetermined goals. However, asymmetric performance of a portfolio's positions can also lead to allocation drift, which will cause a portfolio's risk profile to veer from its strategic plan.

The chart below juxtaposes two portfolios that begin with a simple 50/50 mix of stocks and bonds. The first is rebalanced annually and the other is never rebalanced over a 30-year period. This highlights the "consequences" of allowing a portfolio to drift without rebalancing. If strategic weights are set and then simply ignored, risk is likely to increase over time, as equities play a more dominate role in the portfolio’s allocation. The drift is a direct result of equities having a higher risk premium (and therefore a higher expected return) than bonds. Of course, this is not a certainty, as portfolio risk may decrease over a given time frame. In either scenario, the risk profile of the portfolio becomes incongruent with its intentions.

The data is sourced from Morningstar Direct. For both charts, stocks are represented by the S&P 500, while bonds are represented by the Bloomberg Barclays U.S. Aggregate Bond Index (USD hedged). Portfolios are initially weighted 50% stocks/50% bonds. The 30-year time period represented ranges from 7/1/1990 to 6/30/2020.

The next chart below shows the risk and return metrics of the same two hypothetical portfolios – one that was rebalanced annually and the other that was allowed to drift. Over the 30-year period analyzed below, rebalancing annually decreased the portfolio volatility (as measured by standard deviation), while giving up little in terms of return. This led to the portfolio that was rebalanced to have a higher Sharpe Ratio, a measure of risk-adjusted-return. We wouldn’t necessarily expect this scenario with little “give-up” in returns to play out across all time periods. As we previously mentioned, equities have a higher expected risk and return profile than fixed income, so there will certainly be scenarios where the drifting portfolio’s returns will exceed the rebalanced portfolio. The scenario chosen below is purely illustrative and excludes a number of real-world frictions, such as transaction costs, taxes, and management fees. Further, we believe in continuously monitoring portfolio rebalancing opportunities (as opposed to periodic evaluations). More on this later.

rebalancing

The data is sourced from Morningstar Direct. For both charts, stocks are represented by the S&P 500, while bonds are represented by the Bloomberg Barclays U.S. Aggregate Bond Index (USD hedged). Portfolios are initially weighted 50% stocks/50% bonds. The 30-year time period represented ranges from 7/1/1990 to 6/30/2020.

  1. Rebalancing Helps Avoid Emotional Investment Decisions

Throughout an investor's lifetime, there will inevitably be multiple periods of heightened volatility. Whether this comes in the form of a short-term market shock or a prolonged recession (or even bull-market), oftentimes emotions undermine rationality and may cause clients to veer off their long-term path at the worst possible times. This would include reducing an allocation to risky assets (stocks) just after a steep sell-off, or over-allocating right after a significant run-up in value.

For example, we highlight two time periods below where markets saw steady rises prior to steep declines. In these examples, we see that the portfolio that is not rebalanced will outperform while stocks are rising, however that portfolio will suffer more severe drawdowns during the down markets.

Portfolio Rebalancing

Portfolio Rebalancing

We can see that during 2008, the portfolio that was never rebalanced suffered a severe drawdown that wiped away previous years gains. An investor would have been forced to stomach a much larger portfolio value loss at the time because they had not been periodically rebalancing back to their target weights as the market was rising.

We saw this again during the market selloff in March 2020 during COVID-19. A portfolio that had not been adhering to rebalancing practices would have suffered far greater downside volatility in March, making it that much more difficult for an investor to stay invested. Fortunately, there was that quick bounce back in the stock market, otherwise that downside volatility would have been that much more painful than an investor would expect from a “50/50 portfolio”.

This is not a form of timing the market or making tactical/short-term investment decisions. Rather, it is a rules-based methodology that turns volatility into your friend. Rebalancing, in essence, is simply the codification of the time-honored investment axiom, "buy low and sell high."

The Costs of Rebalancing

Now that we have reviewed the benefits of rebalancing, we must ensure that they outweigh the costs before taking any action. There are two primary costs to consider when rebalancing:

  • Taxes – Assuming a security or asset class is held within a taxable account and has increased in value, rebalancing will cause a capital gain, on which taxes must be paid. It is an advisor’s job to mitigate the resulting tax implications to the best of his or her abilities. In order to facilitate this, one should focus on:
    1. tax-loss harvesting to offset capital gains,
    2. specific tax-lot trading or tax-lot optimization, which identifies optimal tax-lots that will cause the lowest tax-burden and selling winners from accounts that are tax-deferred to the extent possible.
  • Transaction costs – Keeping costs and fees low is one of the key tenets of our investment philosophy. As such, one must be highly considerate of turnover due to explicit (commissions) and implicit (spreads & market impact) costs. Even with extremely low commissions, it is necessary to avoid over-trading (also known as “churning”) portfolios, which can materially detract from long-term results. To further minimize transaction costs, we can potentially elect to have mutual fund distributions paid to cash (as opposed to being reinvested), which allows for a "natural" rebalance of portfolios over time. This is because rebalancing with cash flow generated by the portfolio is more cost-efficient than re-investing and then having to sell/buy to rebalance. The chart below from Vanguard highlights this, in the “redirecting income” column which is how they term this strategy.

Portfolio Rebalancing

Best Strategies for Incorporating Rebalancing

  • Calendar Based – Predetermined, periodic rebalancing (ex. monthly, quarterly, annually)

The only "benefit" to this type of rebalancing is that portfolios do not have to be monitored for opportunities; they are rebalanced at specific intervals without regard to how much the portfolio has drifted from its strategic allocation. We do not subscribe to this methodology, because it effectively ignores the drift in asset classes. If a portfolio only moves slightly (or worse – not at all) over a year and an advisor rebalances, it is likely that it would leave an investor worse-off after controlling for the aforementioned costs. We consider this to be an "old-school" methodology.

  • "Tolerance Band" Based – This approach, also known as "opportunistic rebalancing," "percentage-of-portfolio" or "percent range," rebalances portfolios once they reach a certain deviation threshold.

In our view, this methodology provides a much more favorable outcome, as significant deviations between asset classes are not necessarily dependent on time. To effectively employ this method, it is imperative to leverage technology that allows for continuous monitoring, while only making the decision to rebalance when it makes economic sense.

Unfortunately, there is no "optimal" threshold that can be applied to a rebalancing strategy. When making this decision, one must weigh the delicate balance between allowing an allocation to fluctuate from its strategic weighting by “letting winners run," and the transaction costs (taxes and transaction costs) associated with rebalancing.

In our view, implementing a rebalancing plan and adhering to it is far more important than trying to choose an optimal deviation threshold.

Weighing the Costs and Benefits of Rebalancing

Given that every portfolio has unique qualities, each with its own set of variables to consider, it is exceptionally difficult to quantify the benefits of rebalancing. Even though there are academic studies that attempt to do so within a theoretical framework, we hesitate to place a number on additional value added per year or extrapolating a specific range of "rebalancing alpha."

More importantly, the common denominator throughout the most prestigiously cited research is the overwhelming consensus that rebalancing in a prudent manner improves risk-adjusted returns over time when compared to a drifting portfolio. This does not ensure higher returns, however. It works very well during mean-reverting markets but can hurt during strong trending markets.

Well stated in Plaxco and Arnott's study from 2002, "These results indicate that rebalancing may or may not dominate a drifting portfolio mix in absolute terms, but rebalancing clearly dominates in risk-adjusted terms."

Final Takeaways

Investors are human and prone to emotional and behavioral biases. A sound rebalancing plan helps to ensure that investors stay the course and remain invested throughout volatile market cycles. As an added benefit, it may improve absolute returns, but that would just be a bonus.

During the past 20+ years of advising clients, this fact has become clear: clients do not increase the probability of success of reaching their financial goals by taking on higher risk in their portfolio.


Article By Michael Price, CFA® and Eric Sontag, CFA® 

Wealthspire Advisors

Wealthspire Advisors is the common brand and trade name used by Sontag Advisory LLC and Wealthspire Advisors, LP, separate registered investment advisers and subsidiary companies of NFP Corp.

This information should not be construed as a recommendation, offer to sell, or solicitation of an offer to buy a particular security or investment strategy. The commentary provided is for informational purposes only and should not be relied upon for accounting, legal, or tax advice. While the information is deemed reliable, Wealthspire Advisors cannot guarantee its accuracy, completeness, or suitability for any purpose, and makes no warranties with regard to the results to be obtained from its use. © 2020 Wealthspire Advisors

The post An Introduction To Rebalancing appeared first on ValueWalk.

Read More

Continue Reading

Uncategorized

Economic Earthquake Ahead? The Cracks Are Spreading Fast

Economic Earthquake Ahead? The Cracks Are Spreading Fast

Authored by Brandon Smith via Alt-Market.us,

One of my favorite false narratives…

Published

on

Economic Earthquake Ahead? The Cracks Are Spreading Fast

Authored by Brandon Smith via Alt-Market.us,

One of my favorite false narratives floating around corporate media platforms has been the argument that the American people “just don’t seem to understand how good the economy really is right now.” If only they would look at the stats, they would realize that we are in the middle of a financial renaissance, right? It must be that people have been brainwashed by negative press from conservative sources…

I have to laugh at this notion because it’s a very common one throughout history – it’s an assertion made by almost every single political regime right before a major collapse. These people always say the same things, and when you study economics as long as I have you can’t help but throw up your hands and marvel at their dedication to the propaganda.

One example that comes to mind immediately is the delusional optimism of the “roaring” 1920s and the lead up to the Great Depression. At the time around 60% of the U.S. population was living in poverty conditions (according to the metrics of the decade) earning less than $2000 a year. However, in the years after WWI ravaged Europe, America’s economic power was considered unrivaled.

The 1920s was an era of mass production and rampant consumerism but it was all fueled by easy access to debt, a condition which had not really existed before in America. It was this illusion of prosperity created by the unchecked application of credit that eventually led to the massive stock market bubble and the crash of 1929. This implosion, along with the Federal Reserve’s policy of raising interest rates into economic weakness, created a black hole in the U.S. financial system for over a decade.

There are two primary tools that various failing regimes will often use to distort the true conditions of the economy: Debt and inflation. In the case of America today, we are experiencing BOTH problems simultaneously and this has made certain economic indicators appear healthy when they are, in fact, highly unstable. The average American knows this is the case because they see the effects everyday. They see the damage to their wallets, to their buying power, in the jobs market and in their quality of life. This is why public faith in the economy has been stuck in the dregs since 2021.

The establishment can flash out-of-context stats in people’s faces, but they can’t force the populace to see a recovery that simply does not exist. Let’s go through a short list of the most faulty indicators and the real reasons why the fiscal picture is not a rosy as the media would like us to believe…

The “miracle” labor market recovery

In the case of the U.S. labor market, we have a clear example of distortion through inflation. The $8 trillion+ dropped on the economy in the first 18 months of the pandemic response sent the system over the edge into stagflation land. Helicopter money has a habit of doing two things very well: Blowing up a bubble in stock markets and blowing up a bubble in retail. Hence, the massive rush by Americans to go out and buy, followed by the sudden labor shortage and the race to hire (mostly for low wage part-time jobs).

The problem with this “miracle” is that inflation leads to price explosions, which we have already experienced. The average American is spending around 30% more for goods, services and housing compared to what they were spending in 2020. This is what happens when you have too much money chasing too few goods and limited production.

The jobs market looks great on paper, but the majority of jobs generated in the past few years are jobs that returned after the covid lockdowns ended. The rest are jobs created through monetary stimulus and the artificial retail rush. Part time low wage service sector jobs are not going to keep the country rolling for very long in a stagflation environment. The question is, what happens now that the stimulus punch bowl has been removed?

Just as we witnessed in the 1920s, Americans have turned to debt to make up for higher prices and stagnant wages by maxing out their credit cards. With the central bank keeping interest rates high, the credit safety net will soon falter. This condition also goes for businesses; the same businesses that will jump headlong into mass layoffs when they realize the party is over. It happened during the Great Depression and it will happen again today.

Cracks in the foundation

We saw cracks in the narrative of the financial structure in 2023 with the banking crisis, and without the Federal Reserve backstop policy many more small and medium banks would have dropped dead. The weakness of U.S. banks is offset by the relative strength of the U.S. dollar, which lures in foreign investors hoping to protect their wealth using dollar denominated assets.

But something is amiss. Gold and bitcoin have rocketed higher along with economically sensitive assets and the dollar. This is the opposite of what’s supposed to happen. Gold and BTC are supposed to be hedges against a weak dollar and a weak economy, right? If global faith in the dollar and in the U.S. economy is so high, why are investors diving into protective assets like gold?

Again, as noted above, inflation distorts everything.

Tens of trillions of extra dollars printed by the Fed are floating around and it’s no surprise that much of that cash is flooding into the economy which simply pushes higher right along with prices on the shelf. But, gold and bitcoin are telling us a more honest story about what’s really happening.

Right now, the U.S. government is adding around $600 billion per month to the national debt as the Fed holds rates higher to fight inflation. This debt is going to crush America’s financial standing for global investors who will eventually ask HOW the U.S. is going to handle that growing millstone? As I predicted years ago, the Fed has created a perfect Catch-22 scenario in which the U.S. must either return to rampant inflation, or, face a debt crisis. In either case, U.S. dollar-denominated assets will lose their appeal and their prices will plummet.

“Healthy” GDP is a complete farce

GDP is the most common out-of-context stat used by governments to convince the citizenry that all is well. It is yet another stat that is entirely manipulated by inflation. It is also manipulated by the way in which modern governments define “economic activity.”

GDP is primarily driven by spending. Meaning, the higher inflation goes, the higher prices go, and the higher GDP climbs (to a point). Eventually prices go too high, credit cards tap out and spending ceases. But, for a short time inflation makes GDP (as well as retail sales) look good.

Another factor that creates a bubble is the fact that government spending is actually included in the calculation of GDP. That’s right, every dollar of your tax money that the government wastes helps the establishment by propping up GDP numbers. This is why government spending increases will never stop – It’s too valuable for them to spend as a way to make the economy appear healthier than it is.

The REAL economy is eclipsing the fake economy

The bottom line is that Americans used to be able to ignore the warning signs because their bank accounts were not being directly affected. This is over. Now, every person in the country is dealing with a massive decline in buying power and higher prices across the board on everything – from food and fuel to housing and financial assets alike. Even the wealthy are seeing a compression to their profit and many are struggling to keep their businesses in the black.

The unfortunate truth is that the elections of 2024 will probably be the turning point at which the whole edifice comes tumbling down. Even if the public votes for change, the system is already broken and cannot be repaired without a complete overhaul.

We have consistently avoided taking our medicine and our disease has gotten worse and worse.

People have lost faith in the economy because they have not faced this kind of uncertainty since the 1930s. Even the stagflation crisis of the 1970s will likely pale in comparison to what is about to happen. On the bright side, at least a large number of Americans are aware of the threat, as opposed to the 1920s when the vast majority of people were utterly conned by the government, the banks and the media into thinking all was well. Knowing is the first step to preparing.

The second step is securing your own financial future – that’s where physical precious metals can play a role. Diversifying your savings with inflation-resistant, uninflatable assets whose intrinsic value doesn’t rely on a counterparty’s promise to pay adds resilience to your savings. That’s the main reason physical gold and silver have been the safe haven store-of-value assets of choice for centuries (among both the elite and the everyday citizen).

*  *  *

As the world moves away from dollars and toward Central Bank Digital Currencies (CBDCs), is your 401(k) or IRA really safe? A smart and conservative move is to diversify into a physical gold IRA. That way your savings will be in something solid and enduring. Get your FREE info kit on Gold IRAs from Birch Gold Group. No strings attached, just peace of mind. Click here to secure your future today.

Tyler Durden Fri, 03/08/2024 - 17:00

Read More

Continue Reading

Uncategorized

Wendy’s teases new $3 offer for upcoming holiday

The Daylight Savings Time promotion slashes prices on breakfast.

Published

on

Daylight Savings Time, or the practice of advancing clocks an hour in the spring to maximize natural daylight, is a controversial practice because of the way it leaves many feeling off-sync and tired on the second Sunday in March when the change is made and one has one less hour to sleep in.

Despite annual "Abolish Daylight Savings Time" think pieces and online arguments that crop up with unwavering regularity, Daylight Savings in North America begins on March 10 this year.

Related: Coca-Cola has a new soda for Diet Coke fans

Tapping into some people's very vocal dislike of Daylight Savings Time, fast-food chain Wendy's  (WEN)  is launching a daylight savings promotion that is jokingly designed to make losing an hour of sleep less painful and encourage fans to order breakfast anyway.

Wendy's has recently made a big push to expand its breakfast menu.

Image source: Wendy's.

Promotion wants you to compensate for lost sleep with cheaper breakfast

As it is also meant to drive traffic to the Wendy's app, the promotion allows anyone who makes a purchase of $3 or more through the platform to get a free hot coffee, cold coffee or Frosty Cream Cold Brew.

More Food + Dining:

Available during the Wendy's breakfast hours of 6 a.m. and 10:30 a.m. (which, naturally, will feel even earlier due to Daylight Savings), the deal also allows customers to buy any of its breakfast sandwiches for $3. Items like the Sausage, Egg and Cheese Biscuit, Breakfast Baconator and Maple Bacon Chicken Croissant normally range in price between $4.50 and $7.

The choice of the latter is quite wide since, in the years following the pandemic, Wendy's has made a concerted effort to expand its breakfast menu with a range of new sandwiches with egg in them and sweet items such as the French Toast Sticks. The goal was both to stand out from competitors with a wider breakfast menu and increase traffic to its stores during early-morning hours.

Wendy's deal comes after controversy over 'dynamic pricing'

But last month, the chain known for the square shape of its burger patties ignited controversy after saying that it wanted to introduce "dynamic pricing" in which the cost of many of the items on its menu will vary depending on the time of day. In an earnings call, chief executive Kirk Tanner said that electronic billboards would allow restaurants to display various deals and promotions during slower times in the early morning and late at night.

Outcry was swift and Wendy's ended up walking back its plans with words that they were "misconstrued" as an intent to surge prices during its most popular periods.

While the company issued a statement saying that any changes were meant as "discounts and value offers" during quiet periods rather than raised prices during busy ones, the reputational damage was already done since many saw the clarification as another way to obfuscate its pricing model.

"We said these menuboards would give us more flexibility to change the display of featured items," Wendy's said in its statement. "This was misconstrued in some media reports as an intent to raise prices when demand is highest at our restaurants."

The Daylight Savings Time promotion, in turn, is also a way to demonstrate the kinds of deals Wendy's wants to promote in its stores without putting up full-sized advertising or posters for what is only relevant for a few days.

Related: Veteran fund manager picks favorite stocks for 2024

Read More

Continue Reading

Uncategorized

Inside The Most Ridiculous Jobs Report In Recent History: Record 1.2 Million Immigrant Jobs Added In One Month

Inside The Most Ridiculous Jobs Report In Recent History: Record 1.2 Million Immigrant Jobs Added In One Month

Last month we though that the…

Published

on

Inside The Most Ridiculous Jobs Report In Recent History: Record 1.2 Million Immigrant Jobs Added In One Month

Last month we though that the January jobs report was the "most ridiculous in recent history" but, boy, were we wrong because this morning the Biden department of goalseeked propaganda (aka BLS) published the February jobs report, and holy crap was that something else. Even Goebbels would blush. 

What happened? Let's take a closer look.

On the surface, it was (almost) another blockbuster jobs report, certainly one which nobody expected, or rather just one bank out of 76 expected. Starting at the top, the BLS reported that in February the US unexpectedly added 275K jobs, with just one research analyst (from Dai-Ichi Research) expecting a higher number.

Some context: after last month's record 4-sigma beat, today's print was "only" 3 sigma higher than estimates. Needless to say, two multiple sigma beats in a row used to only happen in the USSR... and now in the US, apparently.

Before we go any further, a quick note on what last month we said was "the most ridiculous jobs report in recent history": it appears the BLS read our comments and decided to stop beclowing itself. It did that by slashing last month's ridiculous print by over a third, and revising what was originally reported as a massive 353K beat to just 229K,  a 124K revision, which was the biggest one-month negative revision in two years!

Of course, that does not mean that this month's jobs print won't be revised lower: it will be, and not just that month but every other month until the November election because that's the only tool left in the Biden admin's box: pretend the economic and jobs are strong, then revise them sharply lower the next month, something we pointed out first last summer and which has not failed to disappoint once.

To be fair, not every aspect of the jobs report was stellar (after all, the BLS had to give it some vague credibility). Take the unemployment rate, after flatlining between 3.4% and 3.8% for two years - and thus denying expectations from Sahm's Rule that a recession may have already started - in February the unemployment rate unexpectedly jumped to 3.9%, the highest since February 2022 (with Black unemployment spiking by 0.3% to 5.6%, an indicator which the Biden admin will quickly slam as widespread economic racism or something).

And then there were average hourly earnings, which after surging 0.6% MoM in January (since revised to 0.5%) and spooking markets that wage growth is so hot, the Fed will have no choice but to delay cuts, in February the number tumbled to just 0.1%, the lowest in two years...

... for one simple reason: last month's average wage surge had nothing to do with actual wages, and everything to do with the BLS estimate of hours worked (which is the denominator in the average wage calculation) which last month tumbled to just 34.1 (we were led to believe) the lowest since the covid pandemic...

... but has since been revised higher while the February print rose even more, to 34.3, hence why the latest average wage data was once again a product not of wages going up, but of how long Americans worked in any weekly period, in this case higher from 34.1 to 34.3, an increase which has a major impact on the average calculation.

While the above data points were examples of some latent weakness in the latest report, perhaps meant to give it a sheen of veracity, it was everything else in the report that was a problem starting with the BLS's latest choice of seasonal adjustments (after last month's wholesale revision), which have gone from merely laughable to full clownshow, as the following comparison between the monthly change in BLS and ADP payrolls shows. The trend is clear: the Biden admin numbers are now clearly rising even as the impartial ADP (which directly logs employment numbers at the company level and is far more accurate), shows an accelerating slowdown.

But it's more than just the Biden admin hanging its "success" on seasonal adjustments: when one digs deeper inside the jobs report, all sorts of ugly things emerge... such as the growing unprecedented divergence between the Establishment (payrolls) survey and much more accurate Household (actual employment) survey. To wit, while in January the BLS claims 275K payrolls were added, the Household survey found that the number of actually employed workers dropped for the third straight month (and 4 in the past 5), this time by 184K (from 161.152K to 160.968K).

This means that while the Payrolls series hits new all time highs every month since December 2020 (when according to the BLS the US had its last month of payrolls losses), the level of Employment has not budged in the past year. Worse, as shown in the chart below, such a gaping divergence has opened between the two series in the past 4 years, that the number of Employed workers would need to soar by 9 million (!) to catch up to what Payrolls claims is the employment situation.

There's more: shifting from a quantitative to a qualitative assessment, reveals just how ugly the composition of "new jobs" has been. Consider this: the BLS reports that in February 2024, the US had 132.9 million full-time jobs and 27.9 million part-time jobs. Well, that's great... until you look back one year and find that in February 2023 the US had 133.2 million full-time jobs, or more than it does one year later! And yes, all the job growth since then has been in part-time jobs, which have increased by 921K since February 2023 (from 27.020 million to 27.941 million).

Here is a summary of the labor composition in the past year: all the new jobs have been part-time jobs!

But wait there's even more, because now that the primary season is over and we enter the heart of election season and political talking points will be thrown around left and right, especially in the context of the immigration crisis created intentionally by the Biden administration which is hoping to import millions of new Democratic voters (maybe the US can hold the presidential election in Honduras or Guatemala, after all it is their citizens that will be illegally casting the key votes in November), what we find is that in February, the number of native-born workers tumbled again, sliding by a massive 560K to just 129.807 million. Add to this the December data, and we get a near-record 2.4 million plunge in native-born workers in just the past 3 months (only the covid crash was worse)!

The offset? A record 1.2 million foreign-born (read immigrants, both legal and illegal but mostly illegal) workers added in February!

Said otherwise, not only has all job creation in the past 6 years has been exclusively for foreign-born workers...

Source: St Louis Fed FRED Native Born and Foreign Born

... but there has been zero job-creation for native born workers since June 2018!

This is a huge issue - especially at a time of an illegal alien flood at the southwest border...

... and is about to become a huge political scandal, because once the inevitable recession finally hits, there will be millions of furious unemployed Americans demanding a more accurate explanation for what happened - i.e., the illegal immigration floodgates that were opened by the Biden admin.

Which is also why Biden's handlers will do everything in their power to insure there is no official recession before November... and why after the election is over, all economic hell will finally break loose. Until then, however, expect the jobs numbers to get even more ridiculous.

Tyler Durden Fri, 03/08/2024 - 13:30

Read More

Continue Reading

Trending