Connect with us

Government

Markets Catch Breath as Politics Trumps Economics

Overview: The dollar is mostly consolidating last
week’s gains. The big news has been on the political front. Thailand’s
opposition parties dealt the…

Published

on

Overview: The dollar is mostly consolidating last week's gains. The big news has been on the political front. Thailand's opposition parties dealt the military-led government a powerful blow. But in Turkey, Erdogan staved off a serious challenge and a run-off later this month looks likely, while his party maintained its parliamentary majority. Tensions over arms shipments to Russia have eased between the US and South Africa, giving the rand a boost. The greenback's gains have been pared against the G10 currencies except the yen. The rand and Thai baht are the strongest among emerging market currencies today. 

Most of the large Asia Pacific bourses advanced today with the notable exception of Taiwan. Of note Japan's major indices are at their best levels since late 2021. Despite the dramatic 4.1% collapse of the eurozone's industrial output in March, the Stoxx 600 is up by about a third of a percent after eking out a small gain last week. US equity futures are trading with a firmer tone. Benchmark 10-year bond yields are mostly 2-3 bp higher in Europe and the US. That puts the 10-year Treasury yield near 3.48%. Gold is within the pre-weekend range and is trading in around a $6 range on either side of $2014. It held the $2000 level ahead of the weekend. June WTI slipped to $69.40 today before recovering. It peaked last week near $73.90. Ahead of the North American session it has moved back above $70.00.

Asia Pacific

A cacophony of voices express concern about the pace of growth in China, even though growth in the first quarter exceeded expectations. The softness of the CPI (0.1% year-over-year) and the deflation in the PPI (-3.6%) is cast in terms of weak demand. Declining imports fit into the narrative. Chinese officials do not seem to share the sense of urgency and left the benchmark one-year medium-term lending facility (MLF) rate steady at 2.75% with CNY125 bln of lending. That is a about CNY25 bln more than is expiring this month. With large borrowing maturing at the end of next month, there is some speculation that the PBOC could reduce reserve requirements, which would facilitate a smooth process.

Ahead of the G7 summit this coming weekend in Hiroshima, the public approval of the Kishida cabinet fell four percentage points to 41.3%, according to the ANN network. Separately, Prime Minister Kishida is calling for a government and BOJ examination of the sustainability to wage increases. It is a big week for Japanese economic data, which includes Q1 GDP, industrial output trade and April CPI. Meanwhile, strong earnings from three large Japanese banks boosted the Topix Bank Index by nearly 1.4% today. It is risen for six of the past seven weeks. It is at its best level since mid-March. The Topix itself at its highs since September 2021 and the Nikkei last saw these levels in November 2021.

The yen is trading heavily and is lower for the sixth session of the past seven. The greenback reached JPY136.25. There is little resistance ahead of JPY136.75-JPY137.00. Initial support is seen in the JPY135.50-75 area. The Australian dollar was sold sharply in the last two sessions, falling from around $0.6800 to near $0.6635. It is trading inside the pre-weekend range (~$0.6635-$0.6705) as it consolidates. It appears to be stalling in Europe shy of $0.6700, where almost A$800 mln options expire tomorrow. Support is seen by $0.6660 now. Meanwhile, the greenback rose to new two-month highs against the Chinese yuan near CNY6.9655 before dollar sales were seen. The PBOC set the dollar's reference rate at CNY6.9654, tightly against expectations (Bloomberg survey) for CNY6.9657. The market may turn cautious ahead of CNY7.00. Lastly, we note that the two main opposition parties won handily in the Thai parliamentary elections. A coalition still needs to be forged, and with the appointed Senate, a prime minister is still to be chosen. The Thai baht strengthened (~0.70% to lead the region), though local shares were sold (~1.4%). 

Europe

Europe's economy stalled in March. Before the weekend, the UK reported its economy unexpectedly contracted by 0.3% in March. Today, the collapse in eurozone industrial output confirms the dismal news from Germany, France, and Italy. The 4.1% month-over-month collapse unwinds the 1.5% gain in Feb and the 1.0% rise in January. Industrial production fell by an average of 0.6% a month in Q4 22 and by 0.1% in Q3. The news stream has deteriorated, and the data surprise models have weakened. 

The EC raised its inflation forecasts for the eurozone to 5.8% this year and 2.8% next year (from 5.6% and 2.5%, respectively). That puts its forecasts 0.5% above the ECBs for this year and 0.1% lower for next year. The EC's growth projections were also lifted. 1.1% this year and 1.6% in 2024. This is up from 0.9% and 1.5%, previously. Separately, before the weekend, Fitch affirmed Italy's sovereign debt rating of BBB with a stable outlook. S&P affirmed the same month ago. Moody's weighs in at the end of the week. It has the equivalent rating but a negative outlook.

The euro is consolidating last week's 1.5% decline, its largest loss since last September. It is in a roughly $1.0845-$1.0880 range through the European morning. The market seems to lack near-term conviction. "Buy the dip" strategy seen in recent weeks appears to have broken down, but with the US debt ceiling looming and bank shares under pressure, the market is reluctant to turn bullish on the greenback. Sterling is largely the same story. The pre-weekend low near $1.2445 held and sterling is consolidating below $1.2500. It needs to push above $1.2510-20 to be notable. On the downside, the $1.24 area looks formidable. Lastly, a run-off for Turkey's president looks necessary (May 28) and Erdogan's AKP held control of parliament. The lira's nearly 0.4% decline is the largest in two months. On the other hand, the easing of tensions between the US and South Africa set the rand 1.4% higher today to snap a four-day slide.

America

Halfway through Q2 23, the US economy is demonstrating an unexpected resilience. Some economists have been talking about a recession for more than a year. In fairness, inventory challenges and trade issues have contributed to the difficulty in assessing the underlying signal. The pandemic also messed up seasonal adjustments. Nevertheless, real final sales to domestic private parties are among the best indicators of the underlying signal during most periods. It excludes inventories, trade, and government and rose 2.9% in Q1. Atlanta's Fed GDP tracker sees Q2 headline GDP at 2.7%. It will be updated tomorrow. Job growth is slowing, and weekly initial jobless claims have been rising gradually, but from the Fed's point of view, it has not cooled sufficiently. When Fed officials submit their forecasts to be compiled into next month's Summary of Economic Projections, the incoming data suggest an upward revision to the median growth forecast (0.4%) and a lower forecast for unemployment (4.5%). 

Meanwhile, the debt ceiling remains unresolved. Neither side can be confident that the public will not blame them and express their disapproval in next year's national election. At the same time, both sides seem incentivized to take it to the brink to demonstrate their resolve to their respective constituent. New meetings between President Biden and congressional leaders are now scheduled for tomorrow. It was initially planned the end of last week. Many pixels have been devoted to what happens after the X-date, but probably more is needed for the other side: if some last-minute deal is struck, as has happened repeatedly since the political dance began. T-bill issuance would swell, and the Treasury's general account (TGA) would be replenished. Both pull in the same direction--tightening financial conditions. While this fiscal drama plays out, US bank shares remain under pressure. According to last week's data, emergency borrowing from the Federal Reserve rose, and bank deposits fell. However, the use of the new Bank Term Funding Program for a year, and this is a maturity transformation mechanism and on favorable terms, which also adds liquidity (notional value, not market price). The deposit walk, $13.8 bln last week, was at large banks, not regional banks, and the previous week's decline was accounted for by foreign banks. Granting protection for transaction accounts, as was the case during the Great Financial Crisis, might be helpful, but now requires congressional approval, and Congress seems distracted. 

The US dollar initially extended last week's gains against the Canadian dollar to almost CAD1.3570 before reversing lower. It approached CAD1.35, where they are options for about $670 mln that expire today. Chart support is seen slightly below there, but a break of CAD1.3460-70 is needed to signal anything important from a technical perspective, and the 200-day moving average is at the lower end of that range. Wildfires in Alberta will be an economic drag. The Mexican peso remains in last Thursday's range (~MXN17.5350-MXN17.70). The attractive interest rate pick-up means still rewards the peso bulls even during periods of consolidation. The central bank meets this week, and many look for it to pause with its overnight rate target at 11.25% and CPI at 6.25%. 

 


Disclaimer

Read More

Continue Reading

Government

Small Business Bankruptcies Surge In 2023, Five Reasons Why

Small Business Bankruptcies Surge In 2023, Five Reasons Why

Authored by Mike Shedlock via MishTalk.com,

Small business bankruptcies are at…

Published

on

Small Business Bankruptcies Surge In 2023, Five Reasons Why

Authored by Mike Shedlock via MishTalk.com,

Small business bankruptcies are at a much higher pace than any year since the Covid pandemic...

Small business bankruptcies from the American Bankruptcy Institute via the Wall Street Journal

The Wall Street Journal reports There’s No Soft Landing for These Businesses

Nearly 1,500 small businesses filed for Subchapter V bankruptcy this year through Sept. 28, nearly as many as in all of 2022, according to the American Bankruptcy Institute.

Bankruptcy petitions are just one sign of financial stress. Small-business loan delinquencies and defaults have edged upward since June 2022 and are now above prepandemic averages, according to Equifax.

An index tracking small-business owners’ confidence ticked down slightly in September, driven by heightened concerns about the economy, according to a survey of more than 750 small businesses. Fifty-two percent of respondents believed that the country is approaching or in a recession, said the survey by Vistage Worldwide, a business-coaching and peer-advisory firm.

Robert Gonzales, a bankruptcy attorney in Nashville, said he’s now getting four times as many calls as he did a year ago from small businesses considering a bankruptcy filing.

“We are just at the front end of the impact of these dramatically higher interest rates,” Gonzales said. “There are going to be plenty of small businesses that are overleveraged.”

Five Reasons for Surge in Bankruptcies

  • Rising Interest Rates

  • Surging Wages

  • Tighter Bank Credit

  • Overleverage

  • Work-at-Home Curtailing Demand

Fed Rate Interest Rate Hike Expectations Are Still Higher for Even Longer

The Fed has hiked interest rates to 5.25% to 5.50%. It’s the highest in 22 years.

And Fed Rate Interest Rate Hike Expectations Are Still Higher for Even Longer

Surge in Wages

Minimum wages have surged. Unions are piling on. Small businesses have to offer prevailing wages or they cannot get workers.

In California, Minimum Wage for Fast Food Workers Jumps 30% to $20 Per Hour. Governor Gavib Newsom called it a “big deal”, I responded:

A Big Deal Indeed, Expect More Inflation

Yes, governor, this is very big deal. It will increase the cost of eating out everywhere.

The bill Newsom signed only applies to restaurants that have at least 60 locations nationwide — with an exception for restaurants that make and sell their own bread, like Panera Bread (what’s that exception all about?)

Nonetheless, the bill will force many small restaurants out of business or they will pony up too.

30 Percent Raise Coming Up!

If McDonalds pays $20, why take $15.50 elsewhere?

The $4.50 hike from $15.50 to $20 is a massive 30 percent jump.

Expect prices at all restaurant to rise. Then think ahead. This extra money is certain to increase demands for all goods and services, so guess what.

Other states will follow California.

Biden Newsome Tag Team

Biden’s energy policies have made the US less secure on oil, more dependent on China for materials needed to make batteries, fueled a surge in inflation, and ironically did not do a damn thing for the environment, arguably making matters worse.

See  The Shocking Truth About Biden’s Proposed Energy Fuel Standards for discussion of the administration’s admitted impacts of Biden’s mileage mandates.

Newsom is doing everything he can to make things even worse.

The tag team of Biden and Newsom is an inflationary sight to behold.

Bank Credit and Over-Leverage

In the wake of the failure of Silicon Valley Bank, across the board small regional banks are curtailing credit.

The regional banks over-leveraged on interest rate bets. And businesses overleveraged too, getting caught up in work-from-home environments that curtailed demand for some goods and services.

The bankruptcies will fall hard on the regional banks.

Add it all up and things rate to get worse.

Tyler Durden Mon, 10/02/2023 - 15:40

Read More

Continue Reading

International

Fair and sustainable futures beyond mining

Mining brings huge social and environmental change to communities: landscapes, livelihoods and the social fabric evolve alongside the industry. But what…

Published

on

Mining brings huge social and environmental change to communities: landscapes, livelihoods and the social fabric evolve alongside the industry. But what happens when the mines close? What problems face communities that lose their main employer and the very core of their identity and social networks? A research fellow at the University of Göttingen provides recommendations for governments to successfully navigate mining communities through their transition toward non-mining economies. Based on past experiences with industrial transitions, she suggests that a three-step approach centred around stakeholder collaboration could be the most effective way forward. This approach combines early planning, local-based solutions, and targeted investments aimed at fostering economic and workforce transformation. This comment article was published in Nature Energy.

Credit: Kamila Svobodova

Mining brings huge social and environmental change to communities: landscapes, livelihoods and the social fabric evolve alongside the industry. But what happens when the mines close? What problems face communities that lose their main employer and the very core of their identity and social networks? A research fellow at the University of Göttingen provides recommendations for governments to successfully navigate mining communities through their transition toward non-mining economies. Based on past experiences with industrial transitions, she suggests that a three-step approach centred around stakeholder collaboration could be the most effective way forward. This approach combines early planning, local-based solutions, and targeted investments aimed at fostering economic and workforce transformation. This comment article was published in Nature Energy.

 

Dr Kamila Svobodova, Marie Skłodowska-Curie Research Fellow at the University of Göttingen, argues that, in practice, governments struggle to truly engage mining communities in both legislation and action. Even the more successful, often deemed exemplary, transitions failed to follow the principles of open and just participation or invest enough time in the process. Early discussions about how the future will look following closure help to build trust and relationships with communities. A combination of bottom-up and top-down approaches engages people at all levels. This ensures that the local context is understood and targeted specifically. It also establishes networks for collaboration during the transition. Effective coordination of investments toward mining communities, including funding to implement measures to support workers, seed new industries, support innovations, and enhance essential services in urban centres, proved to be successful in the past.

 

“To ensure energy security, it’s essential for governments to recognize the profound transformation that residents of mining communities experience when they shift away from mining,” Svobodova explains. “Neglecting these communities, their inherent strength of mining identity and unity, could lead to social and economic instability, potentially affecting the overall national energy infrastructure.”

 

Moving toward closure and consequently away from mining is not an easy or short journey. “It is essential that governments recognize that the transition takes time, and persistence is essential for success,” says Svoboda. “They should openly communicate their strategies, ensuring communities and other stakeholders are well-informed and engaged. Building trust and providing guidance helps residents navigate the uncertainties associated with transitions. By embracing the three-step approach that centers around stakeholder engagement, governments can prioritize equitable and just outcomes when navigating mining transitions as part of their energy security strategies.”

 

Original publication: Svobodova, K., “Navigating community transitions away from mining,” Comment article in Nature Energy 2023. DOI: 10.1038/s41560-023-01359-9. Full text available here: https://rdcu.be/dnmU3 

 

Contact:

Dr Kamila Svobodova

University of Göttingen

Department of Agricultural Economics and Rural Development

Platz der Göttinger Sieben 5, 37073 Göttingen, Germany

kamila.svobodova@uni-goettingen.de

 


Read More

Continue Reading

Government

Turley: Four Biden Impeachment Articles & What The House Will Need To Prove

Turley: Four Biden Impeachment Articles & What The House Will Need To Prove

Authored by Jonathan Turley,

With the commencement of the…

Published

on

Turley: Four Biden Impeachment Articles & What The House Will Need To Prove

Authored by Jonathan Turley,

With the commencement of the impeachment inquiry into the conduct of President Joe Biden, three House committees will now pursue key linkages between the president and the massive influence peddling operation run by his son Hunter and brother James.

The impeachment inquiry should allow the House to finally acquire long-sought records of Hunter, James, and Joe Biden, as well as to pursue witnesses involved in their dealings.

testified this week at the first hearing of the impeachment inquiry on the constitutional standards and practices in moving forward in the investigation. In my view, there is ample justification for an impeachment inquiry. If these allegations are established, they would clearly constitute impeachable offenses. I listed ten of those facts in my testimony that alone were sufficient to move forward with this inquiry.

I was criticized by both the left and the right for the testimony. 

Steven Bannon and others were upset that I did not believe that the basis for impeachment had already been established in the first hearing of the inquiry.

Others were angry that I supported the House efforts to resolve these questions of public corruption.

Without prejudging that evidence, there are four obvious potential articles of impeachment that have been raised in recent disclosures and sworn statements:

  1. bribery,

  2. conspiracy,

  3. obstruction, and

  4. abuse of power.

Bribery is the second impeachable act listed under Article II. The allegation that the President received a bribe worth millions was documented on a FD-1023 form by a trusted FBI source who was paid a significant amount of money by the government. There remain many details that would have to be confirmed in order to turn such an allegation into an article of impeachment.

Yet three facts are now unassailable.

First, Biden has lied about key facts related to these foreign dealings, including false statements flagged by the Washington Post.

Second, the president was indeed the focus of a corrupt multimillion-dollar influence peddling scheme.

Third, Biden may have benefitted from this corruption through millions of dollars sent to his family as well as more direct benefit to Joe and Jill Biden.

What must be established is the President’s knowledge of or participation in this corrupt scheme. The House now has confirmed over 20 calls made to meetings and dinners with these foreign clients. It has confirmation of visits to the White House and dinners and events attended by Joe Biden. It also has confirmation of trips on Air Force II by Hunter to facilitate these deals, as well as payments where the President’s Delaware home address was used as late as 2019 for transfers from China.

The most serious allegations concern reported Washington calls or meetings by Hunter at the behest of these foreign figures. At least one of those calls concerned the removal or isolation of a Ukrainian prosecutor investigating Burisma, an energy company paying Hunter as a board member. A few days later, Biden withheld a billion dollars in an approved loan to Ukrainian in order to force the firing of the prosecutor.

The House will need to strengthen the nexus with the president in seeking firsthand accounts of these meetings, calls, and transfers.

However, there is one thing that the House does not have to do. While there are references to Joe Biden receiving money from Hunter and other benefits (including a proposed ten percent from one of these foreign deals), he has already been shown to have benefited from these transfers.

There is a false narrative being pushed by both politicians and pundits that there is no basis for an inquiry, let alone an impeachment, unless a direct payment or gift can be shown to Joe Biden. That would certainly strengthen the case politically, but it is not essential legally. Even in criminal cases subject to the highest standard, payments to family members can be treated as benefits to a principal actor. Direct benefits can further strengthen articles of impeachment, but they would not be a prerequisite for such an action.

For example, in Ryan v. United States, the Seventh Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals upheld the conviction of George Ryan, formerly Secretary of State and then governor of Illinois, partly on account of benefits paid to his family, including the hiring of a band at his daughter’s wedding and other “undisclosed financial benefits to him and his family and to his friends.” Criminal cases can indeed be built on a “stream of benefits” running to the politician in question, his family, or his friends.

That is also true of past impeachments. I served as lead counsel in the last judicial impeachment tried before the Senate. My client, Judge G. Thomas Porteous, had been impeached by the House for, among other things, benefits received by his children, including gifts related to a wedding.

One of the jurors in the trial was Sen. Robert Menendez (D-N.J.), who voted to convict and remove Porteous. Menendez is now charged with accepting gifts of vastly greater value in the recent corruption indictment.

The similarities between the Menendez and Biden controversies are noteworthy, in everything from the types of gifts to the counsel representing the accused.  The Menendez indictment includes conspiracy charges for honest services fraud, the use of office to serve personal rather the public interests. It also includes extortion under color of official right under 18 U.S.C. 1951. (The Hobbs Act allows for a charge of extortion without a threat of violence but rather the use of official authority.)

Courts have held that conspiracy charges do not require the defendant to be involved in all (or even most) aspects of the planning for a bribe or denial of honest services. Thus, a conspirator does not have to participate “in every overt act or know all the details to be charged as a member of the conspiracy.”

Menendez’s case shows that the Biden Administration is prosecuting individuals under the same type of public corruption that this impeachment inquiry is supposed to prove. The U.S. has long declared influence peddling to be a form of public corruption and signed international conventions to combat precisely this type of corruption around the world.

This impeachment inquiry is going forward. The House just issued subpoenas on Friday for the financial records of both Hunter and James Biden. The public could soon have answers to some of these questions. Madison called impeachment “indispensable…for defending the community” against such corruption. The inquiry itself is an assurance that, wherever this evidence may lead, the House can now follow.

Tyler Durden Mon, 10/02/2023 - 15:00

Read More

Continue Reading

Trending