Connect with us

Government

It’s Official: Nomura Is First Bank To Call For 2022 Recession

It’s Official: Nomura Is First Bank To Call For 2022 Recession

A little over two months ago – in early April – Deutsche Bank shocked Wall…

Published

on

It's Official: Nomura Is First Bank To Call For 2022 Recession

A little over two months ago - in early April - Deutsche Bank shocked Wall Street when it became the first bank to break with the mold of "cautious optimists" when it made a US recession its base case  (agreeing with our dire assessment from late 2021 that a recession was inevitable, if disagreeing with our timeline which put the recession smack in the middle of the second half of 2022, followed by more QE). Well,, since then things have only gone from bad to worse for the US economy, with the Citi US Eco surprise index plunging to pre-covid levels and multi-year lows...

... while the Atlanta Fed GDPNow tracker for Q2 has collapsed to precisely 0.0%, implying that a technical recession is now virtually certain absent a dramatic improvement in the US economy in the remaining ten days of June, and Q2, which is very much unlikely since the slowdown in the US economy is only accelerating to the downside.

Amid this continued deterioration in US economic data, we said that the market's jarring repricing lower was evidence that a recession had become the baseline, and we predicted that "every Wall Street bank would revise their GDP forecasts to contraction in the coming days."

Sure enough, we were right once again because late on Sunday, Nomura became only the second bank to join DB in calling for a recession as its base case, and also became the first bank expecting this outcome to hit some time in the second half (unlike DB's generously delayed forecast of a "late 2023" recession).

And once again echoing what we said back in December 2021, when we predicted that "the Fed is hiking rates into a recession"...

... Nomura warns that the "Fed’s commitment to restoring price stability will likely push the economy into a downturn." I.e., Powell will hike the US right into a recession.

While there is a lot of useful data in the full note (available to premium ZH users in the usual place), we will excerpt some of the key highlights below:

  • With rapidly slowing growth momentum and a Fed committed to restoring price stability, Nomura believes a mild recession starting in Q4 2022 is now more likely than not (ZH: expect the mood to deteriorate further as "mild" eventually becomes "jarring").
  • Financial conditions are likely to tighten further, consumers are experiencing a significant negative sentiment shock, energy and food supply disruptions have worsened and the outlook for foreign growth has deteriorated. All these factors will likely contribute to the expected downturn.
  • Relative to previous downturns, Nomura believes that the significant strength of consumer balance sheets and excess savings should mitigate the speed of the initial contraction. However, policymakers’ hands are tied by persistently high inflation, limiting any initial support from monetary or fiscal stimulus.
  • The bank lowered its real GDP growth forecast in 2022 to 1.8% y-o-y (-0.3% Q4/Q4), down from 2.5% (1.4% Q4/Q4). In 2023, it expects real GDP to  decline 1.0% y-o-y (-1.2% Q4/Q4), down from +1.3% (+0.6% Q4/Q4).
  • The bank also expects the unemployment rate to rise to 5.2% by end-2023 and 5.9% by end- 2024, above previous expectation of a rise to 4.3% over that period.
  • For inflation, the near-term impact of the bank's economic outlook revision is more muted considering the persistent nature of rent inflation and rising inflation expectations. Nomura only lowered its Q4/Q4 2022 core PCE inflation forecast 0.1% to 4.4%, largely reflecting core goods prices. However, the Q4/Q4 2023 core PCE inflation forecast now stands at 2.4%, down from 2.8% previously.
  • With monthly inflation through 2022 likely to remain elevated, Nomura economists believe the Fed response to the downturn will initially be muted, and expect ongoing rate hikes to continue into 2023, but with a slightly lower terminal rate of 3.50-3.75% reached in February (down from our previous forecast of 3.75-4.00% in March). However, it now expects rate cuts in H2 2023, lowering the funds rate to 2.875% by end-2023 and 0.875% by end-2024.

Nomura then goes into a detailed review of all the various factor that have made a late-2022 recession inevitable. We excerpt from these below:

  • The persistence of inflation and a single-mandate Fed - From a very high level, the ongoing persistence of elevated inflation and growing evidence of unanchored inflation expectations are the two key drivers of our expected growth downturn. Despite the Fed’s significant hawkish pivot since November 2021, inflationary pressures have not eased meaningfully and may have arguably worsened (Fig. 2 ). Inflation expectations are showing growing signs of being unanchored (Fig. 3 ). Against that backdrop, we believe the Fed’s efforts to realign demand with depressed supply to rein in price pressures will ultimately drive the economy into a mild recession.

  • Recent financial conditions developments and their implications for growth - Financial conditions have tightened considerably in 2022, but not yet to levels that would suggest a significant drag on growth. Broad measures of equity prices have declined between 20-30% and BBB option-adjusted corporate credit spreads have widened over 60bp. While NFIB’s latest data suggest small businesses are not yet experiencing a material deterioration in credit conditions, that could soon change. Altogether, our financial conditions index has moved lower – implying a roughly neutral impulse to growth after hovering around 3pp in late 2021 – but has not yet entered negative territory (Fig. 4 ).

  • Interest-rate sensitive GDP components - Within the real economy, interest-rate sensitive GDP components are likely to accelerate the downturn. Already, housing demand has shown signs of pronounced weakness as both existing and new home sales move lower and starts and permits lose steam. The sensitivity of US GDP growth to higher interest rates could be larger in this cycle, considering interest rate-sensitive components comprise a historically elevated share of real GDP (fig 5).
  • Durable goods consumption jumped sharply above its recent trend during the pandemic, due to constrained service activity and significant policy support. With rapidly rising interest rates, and deteriorating economic conditions, the pullback in durable goods spending in 2022 and 2023 will likely result in a larger-than-usual negative impulse to growth. In particular, to some degree, durable goods consumption and home sales are interconnected and the recent deterioration in home affordability could weigh on durable goods consumption significantly (Fig. 6 ).

  • Rapid home price growth during the pandemic has pushed up the home price-to-rent ratio to levels not seen since the early 2000s (Fig. 7 ). Despite the lag with which home prices will likely respond to the downturn, we see elevated risk of price corrections, which could prolong the downturn. Moreover, if workers lose bargaining power for remote work opportunities as the unemployment rate rises, COVID-related migration could reverse, which may exert downward pressure on home prices in areas that benefitted from the shift in work conditions

  • Consumers are experiencing a sentiment shock - For much of 2022, we have expected strong service consumption – due to re-opening, pent-up demand and excess savings – to support overall consumer spending despite headwinds for goods consumption. However, in recent months, meaningful signs of a negative consumer sentiment shock have emerged. Google search activity for “recession” has increased above levels that prevailed during the Global Financial Crisis (GFC) and the University of Michigan’s consumer sentiment index dropped to its lowest level on record in June (Fig. 8 and Fig. 9 ).

  • In May, real core retail sales declined notably, but real food services spending also faltered, suggesting a growing risk the expected rotation to services to offset weakness in goods may already be unraveling. The Fed intends to materially slow demand to rein in inflation, and continued elevated employment growth in that context seems increasingly unlikely. Indeed, as evidenced by the June Summary of Economic Projections (SEP), the Fed’s efforts are increasingly designed to push up the unemployment rate over the forecast horizon to lower inflation by reducing labor market tightness.
  • Commodity price shocks risk becoming the new normal - In addition to tighter financial conditions, the exposure of interest-rate sensitive sectors and a consumer sentiment shock, the outlook for supply shocks – particularly for energy and food – has continued to deteriorate this year. The ongoing Russia-Ukraine war and its impact on global commodity markets and supply chains has shown few signs of improvement, and may have started to become more entrenched. After commencing 2022 around $75/barrel and spiking to as high as $123/barrel at the onset of the war, WTI crude oil prices have remained persistently high, averaging close to $120/barrel during June. Retail gasoline prices in the US have risen sharply and persistently from around $3.30/gallon at end-2021 to over $5.00/gallon in June. Increased demand from the ongoing reopening of China after Omicron-linked lockdowns suggests further upside risk to energy prices.

A challenge to bears is that while a recession is now assured, the Fed's intervention to contain it will be delayed: here we agree with Nomura that "one of the most significant differences between our expectation for this recession and prior episodes involves the response from policymakers. In the current high-inflation environment, both monetary and fiscal policy are likely to be much more restrained in their response relative to previous recessions." That is until everything comes crashing down in a global, synchronized recession. Here are some more details from Nomura:

The Fed’s hands are likely to be tied through 2022 by elevated inflation - Fed officials have been clear they will prioritize restoring price stability above all else. Unfortunately, we believe monthly core inflation is likely to remain quite elevated and above levels with which the Fed would be comfortable, at least through 2022, and likely into early 2023. As shown in Fig. 2 , the main driver of elevated trend inflation pressures continues to be owners’ equivalent rent (OER) inflation – one of the largest, and “stickiest,” inflation components. Due to BLS methodological differences and the lead-lag relationship with shelter prices and the economic cycle, Nomura does not expect OER inflation to meaningfully improve until early 2023. As a result, the Fed is likely to downshift to a 50bp rate hike in September, and 25bp per meeting thereafter before holding rates at an elevated rate. However, we do not expect any signs of potential easing from the FOMC, i.e., rate cuts or QE, in the near term.

Over the past decade and a half, the proximity of the Fed’s policy rate to the effective lower bound (ELB) has helped establish a standard “playbook” for responding to recessions, exemplified during the COVID crisis: cut rates swiftly and sharply to the ELB and prepare for large scale asset purchases (LSAPs, or QE), in order to provide additional accommodation.

However, Nomura believes that this playbook is likely to be of little use to policymakers in the current environment, due to persistently elevated inflation. We disagree: while Nomura expects rate cuts to start in H2 2023, they will likely come much later than they otherwise would have absent strong inflationary pressures, we believe that once the US is hit with the deflationary tsunami that is coming, prices will collapse much faster than most expect. Nomura fails to accept this and instead it predicts a pace of rate cuts which will likely to be slower than in previous recessions (Fig. 16 ), adding that "the Fed will continue to reduce the size of its balance sheet into 2023 considering its historically elevated size and their plans to tighten financial conditions beyond raising short-term rates. Both actions run against what policymakers would likely prefer to do in a standard recession." Again, we disagree and expect a full-blown QE episode to be unveiled as soon as early 2023.

Where we do agree with Nomura is in the bank's assessment that "fiscal policy support is likely to be absent, or outright restrictive":

Similar to monetary policy, we believe fiscal policy will largely remain on the sidelines for the expected recession, aside from the regular impact of automatic stabilizers like unemployment insurance. Policymakers in Washington across the spectrum have increasingly taken the view that significant, and unprecedented, fiscal support during the pandemic helped exacerbate inflationary pressures. That experience, combined with widespread voter dissatisfaction due to inflation, will make many members of Congress reluctant to provide any kind of discretionary fiscal stimulus. One of the most striking indications of just how quickly the conversation in Washington has changed has been recent commentary from Biden administration officials on the potential for deficit reduction to help combat inflation. Treasury Secretary Yellen in particular has suggested deficit reduction could help address elevated inflation pressures.

Furthermore, as we have frequently noted...

... Nomura is certainly correct in predicting Congessional gridlock: "with our expectation of a return to divided government after the November 2022 midterm elections – we believe Republicans are likely to take back both the House and the Senate – Washington will likely return to gridlock. Republicans face few incentives to collaborate with the Biden administration with an important presidential election looming in 2024. Moreover, Republicans may be emboldened during debt limit and regular appropriations debates to push for outright spending cuts, which could exacerbate the recession in 2023."

Here, we would predict that far from making monetary policy less likely, the fact that no fiscal stimulus is coming until at least 2025, means that the Fed's liquidity firehose will be front and center as soon as late 2022/early 2023.

Putting it all together

Nomura expects a "modest" recession to start in Q4 2022, Combining the factors above; relative to previous downturns, the bank expects a shallower and longer path, for three reasons.

  • First, robust consumer balance sheets and excess savings should limit how quickly growth decelerates.
  • Second, the lack of policy support – monetary and fiscal – at the onset of the recession will likely prolong its length.
  • Third, despite some concerns over corporate debt, there is no obvious financial accelerator to amplify the recession shocks like the GFC (Fig. 18 ).

In terms of annual changes, Nomura lowered its real GDP growth forecast in 2022 to 1.8% yo-y (-0.3% Q4/Q4), down from 2.5% (1.4% Q4/Q4). In 2023, we expect real GDP to decline 1.0% y-o-y (-1.2% Q4/Q4), down from +1.3% (+0.6% Q4/Q4).

In terms of unemployment, Nomura expects nonfarm payroll employment growth to begin decelerating, but not as quickly as overall growth. Labor demand remains elevated and some firms may engage in labor hording during the initial stages of the downturn, resulting in weak productivity growth. NFP is likely to start declining in February 2023 under our base case. The unemployment rate will likely rise from an expected trough of 3.3% in the next few months to 3.5% by end-2022, 5.2% by end-2023 and 5.9% by end-2024. Our unemployment rate trajectory is less severe relative to the GFC, but slightly higher than 2001, reflecting less initial policy support (Fig. 19 ).

Finally, when looking at its update inflation outlook, Nomura writes that it expects Inflationary pressures remain strong and, due to a number of reasons, and thinks that the economic downturn may not exert substantial near-term disinflationary shocks, resulting in only modest revisions to its inflation forecast.

First, supply constrains will likely continue to help prices remain at elevated levels. To be sure, there have been some encouraging signs of inflationary imbalances easing in certain goods prices, such as home appliances and furniture, which motivates Nomura to lower its forecast for core goods prices modestly. However, vehicle prices, determined by complex supply chains, continued to increase, and it will take time to meet accumulated pent-up demand for vehicles, even if auto production picks up. As a result, Nomura expects core goods prices to continue to make a positive contribution to core PCE inflation on a y-o-y basis until mid-2023 (Fig. 20 ).

  • Second, the Japanese bank expects inflation to be driven more by service prices, which are “stickier” than goods prices. In particular, rent and owners’  equivalent rent (OER) have been accelerating in recent months and private data on rent and house prices suggest BLS rent inflation and OER will likely continue to firm for the next few quarters (Fig. 21 ).  Considering rent and OER are cyclical components, rent-related components will eventually decelerate in reaction to a recession. However, rent/OER tends to lag the broader economic trend as rent for existing leases only updates every one or two years and economic uncertainty could increase the flow of prospective home buyers towards renting. Historically, the impact of recessions on monthly changes in trend inflation measures becomes more pronounced only 6-12 months after a recession begins (Fig. 22 ).
  • Third, long-term inflation expectations might have started to de-anchor as Nomura expects the Fed’s CIE index to jump in Q2 2022 (see Fig. 3 ). If  households and businesses continue to raise their inflation expectations, the risk of an emergence of a new, high-inflation regime would increase, suggesting high inflation could become more persistent despite a recession (forcing the Fed to raise its inflation target to 3% of more). Considering the formation of inflation expectations by households is sensitive to commodity prices, such as food and gasoline, higher commodity prices could enhance the persistency of inflation. Altogether, Nomura lowered its core PCE inflation forecast in Q4 2022 and 2023 only modestly by 0.1pp to 4.4% and 0.4pp to 2.4%, respectively. On a m-o-m basis, Nomura expects core PCE inflation to move below 0.17% (annualized 2%) in Q3 2023, which is consistent with our expected timing of the Fed starting rate cuts.

Of course, Nomura is just the first of many and now that the seal has been breached, we expect many more banks to not only make a recession their base case but to set the timing squarely into second half 2022 territory. What happens next, and predicting (correctly) how - and when - the Fed reacts to this recession will make some people very, very rich in the coming months.

There is much more in the full note available to professional subs in the usual place.

Tyler Durden Mon, 06/20/2022 - 11:45

Read More

Continue Reading

Government

Are Voters Recoiling Against Disorder?

Are Voters Recoiling Against Disorder?

Authored by Michael Barone via The Epoch Times (emphasis ours),

The headlines coming out of the Super…

Published

on

Are Voters Recoiling Against Disorder?

Authored by Michael Barone via The Epoch Times (emphasis ours),

The headlines coming out of the Super Tuesday primaries have got it right. Barring cataclysmic changes, Donald Trump and Joe Biden will be the Republican and Democratic nominees for president in 2024.

(Left) President Joe Biden delivers remarks on canceling student debt at Culver City Julian Dixon Library in Culver City, Calif., on Feb. 21, 2024. (Right) Republican presidential candidate and former U.S. President Donald Trump stands on stage during a campaign event at Big League Dreams Las Vegas in Las Vegas, Nev., on Jan. 27, 2024. (Mario Tama/Getty Images; David Becker/Getty Images)

With Nikki Haley’s withdrawal, there will be no more significantly contested primaries or caucuses—the earliest both parties’ races have been over since something like the current primary-dominated system was put in place in 1972.

The primary results have spotlighted some of both nominees’ weaknesses.

Donald Trump lost high-income, high-educated constituencies, including the entire metro area—aka the Swamp. Many but by no means all Haley votes there were cast by Biden Democrats. Mr. Trump can’t afford to lose too many of the others in target states like Pennsylvania and Michigan.

Majorities and large minorities of voters in overwhelmingly Latino counties in Texas’s Rio Grande Valley and some in Houston voted against Joe Biden, and even more against Senate nominee Rep. Colin Allred (D-Texas).

Returns from Hispanic precincts in New Hampshire and Massachusetts show the same thing. Mr. Biden can’t afford to lose too many Latino votes in target states like Arizona and Georgia.

When Mr. Trump rode down that escalator in 2015, commentators assumed he’d repel Latinos. Instead, Latino voters nationally, and especially the closest eyewitnesses of Biden’s open-border policy, have been trending heavily Republican.

High-income liberal Democrats may sport lawn signs proclaiming, “In this house, we believe ... no human is illegal.” The logical consequence of that belief is an open border. But modest-income folks in border counties know that flows of illegal immigrants result in disorder, disease, and crime.

There is plenty of impatience with increased disorder in election returns below the presidential level. Consider Los Angeles County, America’s largest county, with nearly 10 million people, more people than 40 of the 50 states. It voted 71 percent for Mr. Biden in 2020.

Current returns show county District Attorney George Gascon winning only 21 percent of the vote in the nonpartisan primary. He’ll apparently face Republican Nathan Hochman, a critic of his liberal policies, in November.

Gascon, elected after the May 2020 death of counterfeit-passing suspect George Floyd in Minneapolis, is one of many county prosecutors supported by billionaire George Soros. His policies include not charging juveniles as adults, not seeking higher penalties for gang membership or use of firearms, and bringing fewer misdemeanor cases.

The predictable result has been increased car thefts, burglaries, and personal robberies. Some 120 assistant district attorneys have left the office, and there’s a backlog of 10,000 unprosecuted cases.

More than a dozen other Soros-backed and similarly liberal prosecutors have faced strong opposition or have left office.

St. Louis prosecutor Kim Gardner resigned last May amid lawsuits seeking her removal, Milwaukee’s John Chisholm retired in January, and Baltimore’s Marilyn Mosby was defeated in July 2022 and convicted of perjury in September 2023. Last November, Loudoun County, Virginia, voters (62 percent Biden) ousted liberal Buta Biberaj, who declined to prosecute a transgender student for assault, and in June 2022 voters in San Francisco (85 percent Biden) recalled famed radical Chesa Boudin.

Similarly, this Tuesday, voters in San Francisco passed ballot measures strengthening police powers and requiring treatment of drug-addicted welfare recipients.

In retrospect, it appears the Floyd video, appearing after three months of COVID-19 confinement, sparked a frenzied, even crazed reaction, especially among the highly educated and articulate. One fatal incident was seen as proof that America’s “systemic racism” was worse than ever and that police forces should be defunded and perhaps abolished.

2020 was “the year America went crazy,” I wrote in January 2021, a year in which police funding was actually cut by Democrats in New York, Los Angeles, San Francisco, Seattle, and Denver. A year in which young New York Times (NYT) staffers claimed they were endangered by the publication of Sen. Tom Cotton’s (R-Ark.) opinion article advocating calling in military forces if necessary to stop rioting, as had been done in Detroit in 1967 and Los Angeles in 1992. A craven NYT publisher even fired the editorial page editor for running the article.

Evidence of visible and tangible discontent with increasing violence and its consequences—barren and locked shelves in Manhattan chain drugstores, skyrocketing carjackings in Washington, D.C.—is as unmistakable in polls and election results as it is in daily life in large metropolitan areas. Maybe 2024 will turn out to be the year even liberal America stopped acting crazy.

Chaos and disorder work against incumbents, as they did in 1968 when Democrats saw their party’s popular vote fall from 61 percent to 43 percent.

Views expressed in this article are opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of The Epoch Times or ZeroHedge.

Tyler Durden Sat, 03/09/2024 - 23:20

Read More

Continue Reading

Government

Veterans Affairs Kept COVID-19 Vaccine Mandate In Place Without Evidence

Veterans Affairs Kept COVID-19 Vaccine Mandate In Place Without Evidence

Authored by Zachary Stieber via The Epoch Times (emphasis ours),

The…

Published

on

Veterans Affairs Kept COVID-19 Vaccine Mandate In Place Without Evidence

Authored by Zachary Stieber via The Epoch Times (emphasis ours),

The U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) reviewed no data when deciding in 2023 to keep its COVID-19 vaccine mandate in place.

Doses of a COVID-19 vaccine in Washington in a file image. (Jacquelyn Martin/Pool/AFP via Getty Images)

VA Secretary Denis McDonough said on May 1, 2023, that the end of many other federal mandates “will not impact current policies at the Department of Veterans Affairs.”

He said the mandate was remaining for VA health care personnel “to ensure the safety of veterans and our colleagues.”

Mr. McDonough did not cite any studies or other data. A VA spokesperson declined to provide any data that was reviewed when deciding not to rescind the mandate. The Epoch Times submitted a Freedom of Information Act for “all documents outlining which data was relied upon when establishing the mandate when deciding to keep the mandate in place.”

The agency searched for such data and did not find any.

The VA does not even attempt to justify its policies with science, because it can’t,” Leslie Manookian, president and founder of the Health Freedom Defense Fund, told The Epoch Times.

“The VA just trusts that the process and cost of challenging its unfounded policies is so onerous, most people are dissuaded from even trying,” she added.

The VA’s mandate remains in place to this day.

The VA’s website claims that vaccines “help protect you from getting severe illness” and “offer good protection against most COVID-19 variants,” pointing in part to observational data from the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) that estimate the vaccines provide poor protection against symptomatic infection and transient shielding against hospitalization.

There have also been increasing concerns among outside scientists about confirmed side effects like heart inflammation—the VA hid a safety signal it detected for the inflammation—and possible side effects such as tinnitus, which shift the benefit-risk calculus.

President Joe Biden imposed a slate of COVID-19 vaccine mandates in 2021. The VA was the first federal agency to implement a mandate.

President Biden rescinded the mandates in May 2023, citing a drop in COVID-19 cases and hospitalizations. His administration maintains the choice to require vaccines was the right one and saved lives.

“Our administration’s vaccination requirements helped ensure the safety of workers in critical workforces including those in the healthcare and education sectors, protecting themselves and the populations they serve, and strengthening their ability to provide services without disruptions to operations,” the White House said.

Some experts said requiring vaccination meant many younger people were forced to get a vaccine despite the risks potentially outweighing the benefits, leaving fewer doses for older adults.

By mandating the vaccines to younger people and those with natural immunity from having had COVID, older people in the U.S. and other countries did not have access to them, and many people might have died because of that,” Martin Kulldorff, a professor of medicine on leave from Harvard Medical School, told The Epoch Times previously.

The VA was one of just a handful of agencies to keep its mandate in place following the removal of many federal mandates.

“At this time, the vaccine requirement will remain in effect for VA health care personnel, including VA psychologists, pharmacists, social workers, nursing assistants, physical therapists, respiratory therapists, peer specialists, medical support assistants, engineers, housekeepers, and other clinical, administrative, and infrastructure support employees,” Mr. McDonough wrote to VA employees at the time.

This also includes VA volunteers and contractors. Effectively, this means that any Veterans Health Administration (VHA) employee, volunteer, or contractor who works in VHA facilities, visits VHA facilities, or provides direct care to those we serve will still be subject to the vaccine requirement at this time,” he said. “We continue to monitor and discuss this requirement, and we will provide more information about the vaccination requirements for VA health care employees soon. As always, we will process requests for vaccination exceptions in accordance with applicable laws, regulations, and policies.”

The version of the shots cleared in the fall of 2022, and available through the fall of 2023, did not have any clinical trial data supporting them.

A new version was approved in the fall of 2023 because there were indications that the shots not only offered temporary protection but also that the level of protection was lower than what was observed during earlier stages of the pandemic.

Ms. Manookian, whose group has challenged several of the federal mandates, said that the mandate “illustrates the dangers of the administrative state and how these federal agencies have become a law unto themselves.”

Tyler Durden Sat, 03/09/2024 - 22:10

Read More

Continue Reading

Government

Low Iron Levels In Blood Could Trigger Long COVID: Study

Low Iron Levels In Blood Could Trigger Long COVID: Study

Authored by Amie Dahnke via The Epoch Times (emphasis ours),

People with inadequate…

Published

on

Low Iron Levels In Blood Could Trigger Long COVID: Study

Authored by Amie Dahnke via The Epoch Times (emphasis ours),

People with inadequate iron levels in their blood due to a COVID-19 infection could be at greater risk of long COVID.

(Shutterstock)

A new study indicates that problems with iron levels in the bloodstream likely trigger chronic inflammation and other conditions associated with the post-COVID phenomenon. The findings, published on March 1 in Nature Immunology, could offer new ways to treat or prevent the condition.

Long COVID Patients Have Low Iron Levels

Researchers at the University of Cambridge pinpointed low iron as a potential link to long-COVID symptoms thanks to a study they initiated shortly after the start of the pandemic. They recruited people who tested positive for the virus to provide blood samples for analysis over a year, which allowed the researchers to look for post-infection changes in the blood. The researchers looked at 214 samples and found that 45 percent of patients reported symptoms of long COVID that lasted between three and 10 months.

In analyzing the blood samples, the research team noticed that people experiencing long COVID had low iron levels, contributing to anemia and low red blood cell production, just two weeks after they were diagnosed with COVID-19. This was true for patients regardless of age, sex, or the initial severity of their infection.

According to one of the study co-authors, the removal of iron from the bloodstream is a natural process and defense mechanism of the body.

But it can jeopardize a person’s recovery.

When the body has an infection, it responds by removing iron from the bloodstream. This protects us from potentially lethal bacteria that capture the iron in the bloodstream and grow rapidly. It’s an evolutionary response that redistributes iron in the body, and the blood plasma becomes an iron desert,” University of Oxford professor Hal Drakesmith said in a press release. “However, if this goes on for a long time, there is less iron for red blood cells, so oxygen is transported less efficiently affecting metabolism and energy production, and for white blood cells, which need iron to work properly. The protective mechanism ends up becoming a problem.”

The research team believes that consistently low iron levels could explain why individuals with long COVID continue to experience fatigue and difficulty exercising. As such, the researchers suggested iron supplementation to help regulate and prevent the often debilitating symptoms associated with long COVID.

It isn’t necessarily the case that individuals don’t have enough iron in their body, it’s just that it’s trapped in the wrong place,” Aimee Hanson, a postdoctoral researcher at the University of Cambridge who worked on the study, said in the press release. “What we need is a way to remobilize the iron and pull it back into the bloodstream, where it becomes more useful to the red blood cells.”

The research team pointed out that iron supplementation isn’t always straightforward. Achieving the right level of iron varies from person to person. Too much iron can cause stomach issues, ranging from constipation, nausea, and abdominal pain to gastritis and gastric lesions.

1 in 5 Still Affected by Long COVID

COVID-19 has affected nearly 40 percent of Americans, with one in five of those still suffering from symptoms of long COVID, according to the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Long COVID is marked by health issues that continue at least four weeks after an individual was initially diagnosed with COVID-19. Symptoms can last for days, weeks, months, or years and may include fatigue, cough or chest pain, headache, brain fog, depression or anxiety, digestive issues, and joint or muscle pain.

Tyler Durden Sat, 03/09/2024 - 12:50

Read More

Continue Reading

Trending