Connect with us

A Year Later, The Fact Fedwire Is Still There Tells Us Why Markets Have Done What They’ve Done

A Year Later, The Fact Fedwire Is Still There Tells Us Why Markets Have Done What They’ve Done

Authored by Jeffrey Snider via Alhambra Investments,

The…

Published

on

A Year Later, The Fact Fedwire Is Still There Tells Us Why Markets Have Done What They've Done

Authored by Jeffrey Snider via Alhambra Investments,

The world seemed to have everything going for it, for once, everything coming up favorable for the first time seemingly in forever. There were vaccines, financial government interventions worldwide just recklessly chucking money at anyone with a pulse, an end to the pandemic even normalcy right in front of us.

What could possibly have messed this up?

It was around 11:15 in the morning, Eastern Time, an otherwise totally nondescript Wednesday when something went wrong deep inside the computerized guts of the domestic interbank settlement system. No single thing, these settlement processing arrangements are interlocking sets of algorithmic-heavy progressions linking banks, financial markets of very kind, and trillions in volume every day for every possible money and financial purpose.

It was like someone just up and pulled the plug on something called Fedwire. The cascading failure eventually took down or restricted access to another 14 additional services, from FedCash and FedLine to Check 21, even a multiple of tied-in cryptocurrency exchanges such as CoinBase and Kraken were left scrambling by serious processing delays.

What happened?

To this day, no one has actually offered a complete explanation. Or much of one. Officials at the Federal Reserve, Fedwire’s operators, have only said it was some unspecified “operational error.”

The lone elaboration since it happened have been repeated assurances the event was not a cyberattack. As the Fed’s Treasury Market Practices Group noted about a month after it, they really want you to think there was nothing worth getting worked up over:

Staff noted that the root cause behind the disruption was identified quickly by staff and was not linked to a cybersecurity incident. Upon identifying the root cause, staff communicated updates with external market participants and extended daily deadlines while services were brought back online. Staff noted that this event underscored the importance of efficient and robust emergency communications procedures, and that they would continue building out communication tools to help bolster resiliency in the event of future disruptions.

Yes, resiliency. That does seem quite important.

An IMF review of this and other similar incidents around the world published in December 2021, with, I would imagine, the “latest” information available, again was notable for how little it offered:

No public information is available…According to a statement from the Federal Reserve, it took steps to help ensure the resilience of the Fedwire and NSS applications, including recovery to the point of failure. No further details were provided. Fedwire resumed normal operations after the 3 to 4 hours outage.

If not for what happened next, hardly anyone should care about any of this (admittedly, pretty much no one does still to this day). Unless it truly had been a cyberattack, and I sincerely doubt it was, this Fedwire thing easily left as some long-forgotten unimportant minutiae or footnote.

But…

The date of this event just so happened to be February 24, 2021 – a year ago today. Yet, for reasons that can’t be explained by dryly recounting the facts of that day, the dates February 24 and February 25 remain prominent on a whole range of financial market prices anyway 52 whole weeks later.

And it flies in the face of how the world seemed to be progressing from the 2020 COVID emergency. One day optimism was everywhere; the next, things really began to change in the wrong direction, a lot of things.

In other words, this isn’t now, nor has it been, really about Fedwire. Rather, the key word is another one beginning with the letter “f”, the exact opposite of resiliency.

Fragility.

Start with the US Treasury yield curve itself, particularly its long end where, Irving Fisher, yields are an absolute combination of growth and inflation expectations. Up to February 24, 2021, the yield curve almost exclusively the long end had been steepening. Higher rates (and spreads between those rates) into the future are a wonderful sign of, well, the real potential to get back to normal by at least moving significantly in that direction.

For the curve to suddenly stop steepening, and then move – for an entire year (tomorrow) – back the wrong way is a substantial and substantially unwelcome development. CPIs to the moon, tapering QE, double taper, now aggressive rate hikes, the world public convinced of a massive wave of inflation, yet for all this time in between flat, flatter, so flattened that just a few days ago parts of the curve nearly inverted (the 7s and 10s have touched on a few occasions now).

Not just the yield curve, also deep, key indications such as swap spreads. These, as noted a couple times recently, they really should be decompressing (rising) if that early 2021 optimism was gaining acceptance. The prospect for normalcy meaning normal thus higher rates (short and long), that would price right into decompressing spreads in this market more than anywhere else.

Both the flat curve like compressed swap spreads are clear indications of pessimism, the rising possibility the global system does not normalize; that more ends up going wrong than right, the potential for deflationary outcomes shifting to outweigh the inflationary or even reflationary trends hoping to the upside.

A three-hour delay in payment processing alone doesn’t explain these massive trend shifts.

What that delay triggered was a backlog in dealer settlements which seems to have spilled over (unofficially) into the next day’s processing – which included those same dealers who should have been fully bidding on a 7-year US Treasury auction.

While we don’t have the details, and no one seems to care about releasing them, the 7-year auction – and only that one auction – held on February 25 went badly awry. And, of course, the fact that it did was initially said to be inflation fears; as if banks were avoiding US Treasuries because inflation was by then already in danger of spiraling out of control.

With the added benefit of hindsight, and those market prices/indications subsequently proving this was never the case, a bad Treasury auction had been nothing more than a reminder of what can happen when dealers are distracted or missing to even a small degree.

The sequence of events at the time might have appeared innocuous enough in isolation: Fedwire shuts down for a couple hours on the 24th; money dealers have to play catch up but get clogged up by uncleared transactions while they do; by the afternoon of the 25th, a 7-year note auction goes noticeably awry as distracted dealers are noticeable by their absence; the entire global money system is reminded of actual “liquidity” when something like this happens, as it does all-too-frequently in the post-2007 world where bank reserves are useful only in the sense of setting a fairy tale narrative.

If not for pre-existing systemic fragility, none of this would’ve mattered. Instead, its aftermath was a reminder nothing had been fixed in this same post-2008 sense of monetary fragility. I wrote on March 25, 2021, exactly one month after the troublesome auction:

In other words, problems in the “plumbing” (and we still don’t specifically know what really happened that day last month) aren’t by themselves game-changers; they’ve only become more likely to blow up into major issues since August 2007 because no matter what any Fed Chairman says they never provide the world with anything monetary; the only flood is illusion and, in Jay’s case, self-selected self-delusion.

The probabilities of more things going wrong have long ago overwhelmed the probabilities of some things going or staying right. Perceptions of deflation (disinflation) overtook any leftover perceptions regarding last year’s “inflation.” A fragile global money system absolutely contributes to those former fears; a durably heightened risk of that potential for things going wrong.

It hasn’t just been potential, though, has it? As we’ve meticulously and obsessive chronicled, real money prices and real economy results keep validating the fears, the natural outcomes of fragile. TIC, the dollar, lately eurodollar futures inversion which has exploded as we come up on Fedwire’s sordid little anniversary.

This isn’t to say that this was the only problem, or the only spark which set in motion this ongoing chain of rising deflationary potential. There were clear issues about China, TIC and Japan/Cayman Islands which cropped up back in December 2020. Early cracks in the reflationary dam.

Even swap spreads – take a look (above) at how the 30s had shifted more than a week before Fedwire and that bad 7s auction. It could’ve been a random fluctuation of spread compression, but given the perceptions about that time (inflation, interest rates nowhere to go but up) that sudden bout of downgrade really makes it seem like there were other problems in the monetary area which were becoming apparent just as February 24 and 25 approached.

If so, then the timing for this actually random event couldn’t have been worse. Though, thinking ahead, if not Fedwire a year ago then very likely something else.

That’s why markets are the way they are right now: the response to last year’s “inflation” had already been issued by the real money system itself – no need to get Jay Powell involved, even to explain what actually happened. After February 24, inflation never had a chance.

The public and the FOMC just never got the message though it’s been hiding in plain sight ever since that one Wednesday.

Tyler Durden Thu, 02/24/2022 - 17:00

Read More

Continue Reading

Uncategorized

February Employment Situation

By Paul Gomme and Peter Rupert The establishment data from the BLS showed a 275,000 increase in payroll employment for February, outpacing the 230,000…

Published

on

By Paul Gomme and Peter Rupert

The establishment data from the BLS showed a 275,000 increase in payroll employment for February, outpacing the 230,000 average over the previous 12 months. The payroll data for January and December were revised down by a total of 167,000. The private sector added 223,000 new jobs, the largest gain since May of last year.

Temporary help services employment continues a steep decline after a sharp post-pandemic rise.

Average hours of work increased from 34.2 to 34.3. The increase, along with the 223,000 private employment increase led to a hefty increase in total hours of 5.6% at an annualized rate, also the largest increase since May of last year.

The establishment report, once again, beat “expectations;” the WSJ survey of economists was 198,000. Other than the downward revisions, mentioned above, another bit of negative news was a smallish increase in wage growth, from $34.52 to $34.57.

The household survey shows that the labor force increased 150,000, a drop in employment of 184,000 and an increase in the number of unemployed persons of 334,000. The labor force participation rate held steady at 62.5, the employment to population ratio decreased from 60.2 to 60.1 and the unemployment rate increased from 3.66 to 3.86. Remember that the unemployment rate is the number of unemployed relative to the labor force (the number employed plus the number unemployed). Consequently, the unemployment rate can go up if the number of unemployed rises holding fixed the labor force, or if the labor force shrinks holding the number unemployed unchanged. An increase in the unemployment rate is not necessarily a bad thing: it may reflect a strong labor market drawing “marginally attached” individuals from outside the labor force. Indeed, there was a 96,000 decline in those workers.

Earlier in the week, the BLS announced JOLTS (Job Openings and Labor Turnover Survey) data for January. There isn’t much to report here as the job openings changed little at 8.9 million, the number of hires and total separations were little changed at 5.7 million and 5.3 million, respectively.

As has been the case for the last couple of years, the number of job openings remains higher than the number of unemployed persons.

Also earlier in the week the BLS announced that productivity increased 3.2% in the 4th quarter with output rising 3.5% and hours of work rising 0.3%.

The bottom line is that the labor market continues its surprisingly (to some) strong performance, once again proving stronger than many had expected. This strength makes it difficult to justify any interest rate cuts soon, particularly given the recent inflation spike.

Read More

Continue Reading

Spread & Containment

Another beloved brewery files Chapter 11 bankruptcy

The beer industry has been devastated by covid, changing tastes, and maybe fallout from the Bud Light scandal.

Published

on

Before the covid pandemic, craft beer was having a moment. Most cities had multiple breweries and taprooms with some having so many that people put together the brewery version of a pub crawl.

It was a period where beer snobbery ruled the day and it was not uncommon to hear bar patrons discuss the makeup of the beer the beer they were drinking. This boom period always seemed destined for failure, or at least a retraction as many markets seemed to have more craft breweries than they could support.

Related: Fast-food chain closes more stores after Chapter 11 bankruptcy

The pandemic, however, hastened that downfall. Many of these local and regional craft breweries counted on in-person sales to drive their business. 

And while many had local and regional distribution, selling through a third party comes with much lower margins. Direct sales drove their business and the pandemic forced many breweries to shut down their taprooms during the period where social distancing rules were in effect.

During those months the breweries still had rent and employees to pay while little money was coming in. That led to a number of popular beermakers including San Francisco's nationally-known Anchor Brewing as well as many regional favorites including Chicago’s Metropolitan Brewing, New Jersey’s Flying Fish, Denver’s Joyride Brewing, Tampa’s Zydeco Brew Werks, and Cleveland’s Terrestrial Brewing filing bankruptcy.

Some of these brands hope to survive, but others, including Anchor Brewing, fell into Chapter 7 liquidation. Now, another domino has fallen as a popular regional brewery has filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection.

Overall beer sales have fallen.

Image source: Shutterstock

Covid is not the only reason for brewery bankruptcies

While covid deserves some of the blame for brewery failures, it's not the only reason why so many have filed for bankruptcy protection. Overall beer sales have fallen driven by younger people embracing non-alcoholic cocktails, and the rise in popularity of non-beer alcoholic offerings,

Beer sales have fallen to their lowest levels since 1999 and some industry analysts

"Sales declined by more than 5% in the first nine months of the year, dragged down not only by the backlash and boycotts against Anheuser-Busch-owned Bud Light but the changing habits of younger drinkers," according to data from Beer Marketer’s Insights published by the New York Post.

Bud Light parent Anheuser Busch InBev (BUD) faced massive boycotts after it partnered with transgender social media influencer Dylan Mulvaney. It was a very small partnership but it led to a right-wing backlash spurred on by Kid Rock, who posted a video on social media where he chastised the company before shooting up cases of Bud Light with an automatic weapon.

Another brewery files Chapter 11 bankruptcy

Gizmo Brew Works, which does business under the name Roth Brewing Company LLC, filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection on March 8. In its filing, the company checked the box that indicates that its debts are less than $7.5 million and it chooses to proceed under Subchapter V of Chapter 11. 

"Both small business and subchapter V cases are treated differently than a traditional chapter 11 case primarily due to accelerated deadlines and the speed with which the plan is confirmed," USCourts.gov explained. 

Roth Brewing/Gizmo Brew Works shared that it has 50-99 creditors and assets $100,000 and $500,000. The filing noted that the company does expect to have funds available for unsecured creditors. 

The popular brewery operates three taprooms and sells its beer to go at those locations.

"Join us at Gizmo Brew Works Craft Brewery and Taprooms located in Raleigh, Durham, and Chapel Hill, North Carolina. Find us for entertainment, live music, food trucks, beer specials, and most importantly, great-tasting craft beer by Gizmo Brew Works," the company shared on its website.

The company estimates that it has between $1 and $10 million in liabilities (a broad range as the bankruptcy form does not provide a space to be more specific).

Gizmo Brew Works/Roth Brewing did not share a reorganization or funding plan in its bankruptcy filing. An email request for comment sent through the company's contact page was not immediately returned.

 

Read More

Continue Reading

Government

Walmart joins Costco in sharing key pricing news

The massive retailers have both shared information that some retailers keep very close to the vest.

Published

on

As we head toward a presidential election, the presumed candidates for both parties will look for issues that rally undecided voters. 

The economy will be a key issue, with Democrats pointing to job creation and lowering prices while Republicans will cite the layoffs at Big Tech companies, high housing prices, and of course, sticky inflation.

The covid pandemic created a perfect storm for inflation and higher prices. It became harder to get many items because people getting sick slowed down, or even stopped, production at some factories.

Related: Popular mall retailer shuts down abruptly after bankruptcy filing

It was also a period where demand increased while shipping, trucking and delivery systems were all strained or thrown out of whack. The combination led to product shortages and higher prices.

You might have gone to the grocery store and not been able to buy your favorite paper towel brand or find toilet paper at all. That happened partly because of the supply chain and partly due to increased demand, but at the end of the day, it led to higher prices, which some consumers blamed on President Joe Biden's administration.

Biden, of course, was blamed for the price increases, but as inflation has dropped and grocery prices have fallen, few companies have been up front about it. That's probably not a political choice in most cases. Instead, some companies have chosen to lower prices more slowly than they raised them.

However, two major retailers, Walmart (WMT) and Costco, have been very honest about inflation. Walmart Chief Executive Doug McMillon's most recent comments validate what Biden's administration has been saying about the state of the economy. And they contrast with the economic picture being painted by Republicans who support their presumptive nominee, Donald Trump.

Walmart has seen inflation drop in many key areas.

Image source: Joe Raedle/Getty Images

Walmart sees lower prices

McMillon does not talk about lower prices to make a political statement. He's communicating with customers and potential customers through the analysts who cover the company's quarterly-earnings calls.

During Walmart's fiscal-fourth-quarter-earnings call, McMillon was clear that prices are going down.

"I'm excited about the omnichannel net promoter score trends the team is driving. Across countries, we continue to see a customer that's resilient but looking for value. As always, we're working hard to deliver that for them, including through our rollbacks on food pricing in Walmart U.S. Those were up significantly in Q4 versus last year, following a big increase in Q3," he said.

He was specific about where the chain has seen prices go down.

"Our general merchandise prices are lower than a year ago and even two years ago in some categories, which means our customers are finding value in areas like apparel and hard lines," he said. "In food, prices are lower than a year ago in places like eggs, apples, and deli snacks, but higher in other places like asparagus and blackberries."

McMillon said that in other areas prices were still up but have been falling.

"Dry grocery and consumables categories like paper goods and cleaning supplies are up mid-single digits versus last year and high teens versus two years ago. Private-brand penetration is up in many of the countries where we operate, including the United States," he said.

Costco sees almost no inflation impact

McMillon avoided the word inflation in his comments. Costco  (COST)  Chief Financial Officer Richard Galanti, who steps down on March 15, has been very transparent on the topic.

The CFO commented on inflation during his company's fiscal-first-quarter-earnings call.

"Most recently, in the last fourth-quarter discussion, we had estimated that year-over-year inflation was in the 1% to 2% range. Our estimate for the quarter just ended, that inflation was in the 0% to 1% range," he said.

Galanti made clear that inflation (and even deflation) varied by category.

"A bigger deflation in some big and bulky items like furniture sets due to lower freight costs year over year, as well as on things like domestics, bulky lower-priced items, again, where the freight cost is significant. Some deflationary items were as much as 20% to 30% and, again, mostly freight-related," he added.

Read More

Continue Reading

Trending