Connect with us

Government

What Is Gross Domestic Product (GDP)? Definition and FAQ

What Is Gross Domestic Product (GDP)?    Put simply, gross domestic product (GDP) seeks to measure a country’s economic output during a specific time period. GDP represents the total monetary or market value of all final goods and services produced…

Published

on

GDP is a "backward-looking" measure of a nation's economic output. 

Joshua Hoehne via Unsplash; Canva

What Is Gross Domestic Product (GDP)?    

Put simply, gross domestic product (GDP) seeks to measure a country's economic output during a specific time period. GDP represents the total monetary or market value of all final goods and services produced (and sold on the market) within a country's borders during a period of time (typically one year). Intermediate goods and services—those used in the production of final goods and services—are left out of GDP to prevent double-counting.

The calculation of a country's GDP encompasses all private and public consumption, government outlays, investments, additions to private business inventories, paid-in construction costs, and the foreign balance of trade. (Exports are added to the value and imports are subtracted.) The foreign balance of trade is an especially important component of GDP.

A country's GDP tends to increase when the total value of goods and services that domestic producers sell to foreign countries (exports) exceeds the total value of foreign goods and services that domestic consumers buy (imports). This situation constitutes a trade surplus. A trade deficit occurs if the amount spent on imports is greater than the total revenues produced by selling exports. Running a trade deficit can decrease a country's GDP.

While not directly a measure of GDP, economists also consider purchasing power parity (PPP) to see how one country's GDP measures up in "international dollars." The calculation of PPP adjusts for differences in local prices and costs of living to make cross-country comparisons of real output, real income, and living standards.

What Do High and Low GDPs Mean?

Countries with larger GDPs generate more goods and services within their borders. They also typically have a higher standard of living. Many political leaders see GDP growth as an important measure of national success and often use "GDP growth" and "economic growth" interchangeably. However, many economists argue that GDP has too many limitations to be an effective proxy for overall economic success, much less the more general success of a society.

GDP growth is often looked to as a measure of the overall health of an economy. A figure in the range of 3% GDP growth is considered healthy, whereas a GDP growth factor anywhere from 0% to about 2.7% is viewed as mediocre.

A negative GDP growth rate can indicate an economy that's struggling. A rough rule of thumb is that two consecutive quarters of negative GDP growth constitute a recession. However, it's important to keep in mind that a negative GDP figure can result from temporary factors such as adverse weather or an inventory correction—or a global pandemic such as COVID-19.

How Do Investors Use GDP?

GDP's market impact is generally limited because it is a "backward-looking" measure. However, GDP data can affect markets if the actual numbers differ considerably from expectations. GDP provides a direct indication of the health of the economy, so businesses can use GDP as a guide to their business strategy.

The U.S. Federal Reserve System (the Fed) considers the growth rate and other GDP statistics when determining what monetary policies to implement. If the growth rate is slowing, the Fed might use an expansionary monetary policy to try to boost the economy. If the growth rate is robust, the Fed might use monetary tools to slow things down with the goal of preventing inflation.

Investors use GDP as one framework for decision-making. The corporate profits and inventory data in the U.S. Commerce Department's quarterly GDP reports are a great resource for equity investors because both categories show total growth during the period. The corporate profits data also provides pretax profits, operating cash flows, and breakdowns for all major sectors of the economy.

Those interested in international investing can compare the GDP growth rates of different countries when considering asset allocation. International investors can also use GDP data when choosing whether to invest in fast-growing economies abroad—and, if so, which ones. The Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) offers a customizable chart where you can explore many facets of GDP by country.

When Is GDP Measured?

In the United States, the government releases an annualized GDP estimate for each fiscal quarter and for the calendar year. The Commerce Department releases estimates of GDP once per quarter. But it's a bit more complicated than that, because the Commerce Department releases three different estimates each quarter.

The first estimate, called the Advance Report, comes out on the last business day of the following months:

  • January for the fourth quarter of the previous year
  • April for the first quarter
  • July for the second quarter
  • October for the third quarter

The second estimate, called the Preliminary Report, is released one month later, on the last business day of the following months:

  • February for the fourth quarter of the previous year
  • May for the first quarter
  • August for the second quarter
  • November for the third quarter

The third and last estimate is fittingly called the Final Report. Final Reports are released one month after the Preliminary Reports, on the last business day of the following months:

  • March for the fourth quarter of the previous year
  • June for the first quarter
  • September for the second quarter
  • December for the third quarter

There are lots of estimates of U.S. GDP to choose from! But what exactly do these estimates capture, and how is that information used?

What Does GDP Leave Out?

As we've said, gross domestic product is solely a monetary measure of the market value of all the final goods and services produced within a country in a specific time period. GDP is considered the most important indicator of economic activity, but it falls short of providing a good measure of people's material well-being.

A higher GDP is typically associated with greater economic opportunities and an improved standard of living. However, a country might have a high GDP while still being an undesirable place to live due to issues such as pollution, restricted freedoms, or overall environmental degradation. This is why economists, analysts, and politicians often consider other measurements in addition to GDP.

For example, if a country has a high overall GDP but a low per-capita GDP, significant wealth might be concentrated in the hands of very few people. The United Nations' Human Development Index (HDI) is one assessment of economic development that can be considered alongside GDP to get a more robust picture of the quality of life for a country's citizens.

This U.N. graphic shows the components that contribute to a nation's Human Development Index (HDI).

United Nations Development Programme Human Development Reports, Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 IGO

Other measurements that attempt to address the shortcomings of GDP include the Genuine Progress Indicator and the Gross National Happiness Index. Here's one look at how such measurements were affected by the COVID-19 global pandemic.

Since the latter half of the 20th century, economists and others have been looking for ways to account for the fact that GDP leaves out all volunteer and other unpaid work. This means that all of the following are left out of GDP figures:

  • Unpaid work performed within the family, such as childcare, housework, and yard work
  • Caregiving provided by family members for people with disabilities or infirm elderly people
  • All volunteer work
  • Nonmonetary-compensated work, such as work done in lieu of rent
  • Goods not produced for sale in the marketplace, such as artwork produced as a gift or as a prize for a charity event
  • Bartered goods and services
  • Black market activity such as pirated films and music
  • Illegal activities such as drug sales
  • Sales of used goods

Unreported transactions, such as simply working illegally (not registered for tax and social security), are included in GDP through estimates. An example would be cash payments to a housecleaner whose work is not declared.

3 Different Types of GDP

GDP can be measured in several ways, including nominal GDP, real GDP, and GDP per capita.

1. Nominal GDP

Nominal GDP is an assessment of economic production in an economy that includes current prices in its calculation. In other words, it doesn't strip out inflation or the pace of rising prices, which can inflate the growth figure. All goods and services counted in nominal GDP are valued at the prices that those goods and services actually sold for in that year. Nominal GDP is evaluated in either the local currency or U.S. dollars at currency market exchange rates to compare countries' GDPs in purely financial terms.

Nominal GDP is used when comparing different quarters of output within the same year. When comparing the GDP of two or more years, real GDP is used. This is because, in effect, the removal of the influence of inflation allows the comparison of the different years to focus solely on volume.

2. Real GDP

Real GDP is an inflation-adjusted measure that reflects the quantity of goods and services produced by an economy in a given year, with prices held constant from year to year to separate out the impact of inflation or deflation from the trend in output over time. Since GDP is based on the monetary value of goods and services, it is subject to inflation.

Rising prices will tend to increase a country's GDP, but this does not necessarily reflect any change in the quantity or quality of goods and services produced. Thus, by looking just at an economy's nominal GDP, it can be difficult to tell whether the figure has risen because of a real expansion in production or simply because prices rose.

Economists use a process that adjusts for inflation to arrive at an economy's real GDP. By adjusting the output in any given year for the price levels that prevailed in a reference year, called the base year, economists can adjust for inflation's impact. This way, it is possible to compare a country's GDP from one year to another and see if there is any real growth.

Real GDP is calculated using a GDP price deflator, which is the difference in prices between the current year and the base year. For example, if prices rose by 5% since the base year, then the deflator would be 1.05. Nominal GDP is divided by this deflator, yielding real GDP. Nominal GDP is usually higher than real GDP because inflation is typically a positive number.

Real GDP accounts for changes in market value and thus narrows the difference between output figures from year to year. If there is a large discrepancy between a nation's real GDP and nominal GDP, this may be an indicator of significant inflation or deflation in its economy.

3. GDP per Capita

GDP per capita is a measurement of the GDP per person in a country’s population. It indicates that the amount of output or income per person in an economy can indicate average productivity or average living standards. GDP per capita can be stated in nominal, real (inflation-adjusted), or PPP (purchasing power parity) terms.

At a basic interpretation, per-capita GDP shows how much economic production value can be attributed to each individual citizen. This also translates to a measure of overall national wealth since GDP market value per person also readily serves as a prosperity measure.

Per-capita GDP is often analyzed alongside more traditional measures of GDP. Economists use this metric for insight into their own country’s domestic productivity and the productivity of other countries. Per-capita GDP considers both a country’s GDP and its population. Therefore, it can be important to understand how each factor contributes to the overall result and is affecting per-capita GDP growth.

If a country’s per-capita GDP is growing with a stable population level, for example, it could be the result of technological progressions that are producing more with the same population level. Some countries may have a high per-capita GDP but a small population, which usually means they have built up a self-sufficient economy based on an abundance of special resources.

GNI (Gross National Income) is a metric similar to GNP since both are based on nationality rather than geography. The difference is that, when calculating the total value, GNI uses the income approach whereas GNP uses the production approach to calculate GDP. Both GNP and GNI should theoretically yield the same result.

How Is GDP Calculated?

GDP can be calculated in three ways, using expenditures, production, or incomes. It can be adjusted for inflation and population to provide deeper insights. All three calculation methods should yield the same figure when correctly calculated. These three approaches are often termed the expenditure approach, the output (or production) approach, and the income approach.

The Expenditure Approach

The expenditure approach, also known as the spending approach, calculates spending by the different groups that participate in the economy. The U.S. GDP is primarily measured based on the expenditure approach. This approach can be calculated using the following formula:

GDP = C + G + I + NX

C = consumption
G = government spending
I = investment
NX = net exports

Consumption refers to consumer spending. As a consumer, you spend money to acquire goods and services, such as groceries and haircuts. Consumer spending makes up more than two-thirds of the U.S. GDP, so consumer confidence has a significant effect on economic growth. Confident consumers are typically willing to spend, whereas anxious consumers might feel uncertain about the future and therefore afraid to spend.

Government spending represents both government consumption expenditures and gross investment. Governments spending includes equipment, infrastructure, and payroll.

Investment refers to domestic investment or capital expenditures by private businesses. For example, a business might buy additional machinery or invest in research and development for a new product. Business investment is important because it increases the economy’s productive capacity and often improves employment levels.

To arrive at net exports, subtract total imports from total exports (NX = exports − imports). All expenditures by companies located in a given country, even if they are foreign companies, are included in this calculation.

The Production (Output) Approach

The production approach is essentially the reverse of the expenditure approach. Instead of measuring the input costs that contribute to economic activity, the production approach estimates the total value of economic output and deducts the cost of intermediate goods that are consumed in the process (like those of materials and services). Whereas the expenditure approach projects forward from costs, the production approach looks backward from the vantage point of a state of completed economic activity.

The Income Approach

The income approach represents a kind of middle ground between the expenditure approach and the production approach. The income approach calculates the income earned by all the factors of production in an economy, including the wages paid to labor, the rent earned by land, the return on capital in the form of interest, and corporate profits.

The income approach factors in some adjustments for those items that are not considered payments made to factors of production. For one, some taxes—such as sales taxes and property taxes—are classified as indirect business taxes. In addition, depreciation—a reserve that businesses set aside to account for the replacement of equipment that tends to wear down with use—is also added to the national income. All of this together constitutes a nation’s income.

When Did GDP Measurement Originate? 

An initial concept of GDP was invented at the end of the 18th century. American economist Simon Kuznets developed the modern concept in 1934 as he worked on a report to Congress in the aftermath of the Great Depression. Kuznets’s concept of GDP later was adopted as the main measure of a country's economy at the Bretton Woods conference in 1944.

Where Can I Learn More About GDP? 

The World Bank hosts one of the most reliable web-based databases. It has one of the best and most comprehensive lists of countries for which it tracks GDP data. The International Money Fund (IMF) also provides GDP data through its multiple databases, such as World Economic Outlook and International Financial Statistics.

Another highly reliable source of GDP data is the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). The OECD not only provides historical data but also forecasts GDP growth. The disadvantage of using the OECD database is that it tracks only OECD member countries and a few nonmember countries.

The U.S. Fed collects data from multiple sources, including a country’s statistical agencies and The World Bank. The only drawback to using a Fed database is a lack of updating in GDP data and an absence of data for certain countries.

The Bureau of Economic Analysis (BEA), a division of the U.S. Department of Commerce, issues its own analysis document with each GDP release. The BEA analysis is a great investor tool for understanding figures and trends and getting highlights of the lengthy GDP document.

The Bottom Line

In their seminal textbook Economics, Paul Samuelson and William Nordhaus compare GDP’s overall picture of the state of the economy to that of a space satellite that surveys the weather across an entire continent.

GDP enables policy-makers and central banks to judge whether the economy is contracting or expanding. If GPD suggests either a coming recession or developing inflation, central banks can deploy tools to boost or cool the economy. Similarly, investors use GDP when considering the overall health of the economy or of a particular business sector.

Like any measure, GDP has its imperfections. In recent decades, governments have developed modifications with the aim of increasing GDP accuracy and specificity. Means of calculating GDP have also evolved continually since its conception. New calculations seek to keep pace both with evolving measurements of industry activity and with emerging forms and consumption of intangible assets.

Read More

Continue Reading

Government

CDC Warns Thousands Of Children Sent To ER After Taking Common Sleep Aid

CDC Warns Thousands Of Children Sent To ER After Taking Common Sleep Aid

Authored by Jack Phillips via The Epoch Times (emphasis ours),

A…

Published

on

CDC Warns Thousands Of Children Sent To ER After Taking Common Sleep Aid

Authored by Jack Phillips via The Epoch Times (emphasis ours),

A U.S. Centers for Disease Control (CDC) paper released Thursday found that thousands of young children have been taken to the emergency room over the past several years after taking the very common sleep-aid supplement melatonin.

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) headquarters in Atlanta, Georgia, on April 23, 2020. (Tami Chappell/AFP via Getty Images)

The agency said that melatonin, which can come in gummies that are meant for adults, was implicated in about 7 percent of all emergency room visits for young children and infants “for unsupervised medication ingestions,” adding that many incidents were linked to the ingestion of gummy formulations that were flavored. Those incidents occurred between the years 2019 and 2022.

Melatonin is a hormone produced by the human body to regulate its sleep cycle. Supplements, which are sold in a number of different formulas, are generally taken before falling asleep and are popular among people suffering from insomnia, jet lag, chronic pain, or other problems.

The supplement isn’t regulated by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration and does not require child-resistant packaging. However, a number of supplement companies include caps or lids that are difficult for children to open.

The CDC report said that a significant number of melatonin-ingestion cases among young children were due to the children opening bottles that had not been properly closed or were within their reach. Thursday’s report, the agency said, “highlights the importance of educating parents and other caregivers about keeping all medications and supplements (including gummies) out of children’s reach and sight,” including melatonin.

The approximately 11,000 emergency department visits for unsupervised melatonin ingestions by infants and young children during 2019–2022 highlight the importance of educating parents and other caregivers about keeping all medications and supplements (including gummies) out of children’s reach and sight.

The CDC notes that melatonin use among Americans has increased five-fold over the past 25 years or so. That has coincided with a 530 percent increase in poison center calls for melatonin exposures to children between 2012 and 2021, it said, as well as a 420 percent increase in emergency visits for unsupervised melatonin ingestion by young children or infants between 2009 and 2020.

Some health officials advise that children under the age of 3 should avoid taking melatonin unless a doctor says otherwise. Side effects include drowsiness, headaches, agitation, dizziness, and bed wetting.

Other symptoms of too much melatonin include nausea, diarrhea, joint pain, anxiety, and irritability. The supplement can also impact blood pressure.

However, there is no established threshold for a melatonin overdose, officials have said. Most adult melatonin supplements contain a maximum of 10 milligrams of melatonin per serving, and some contain less.

Many people can tolerate even relatively large doses of melatonin without significant harm, officials say. But there is no antidote for an overdose. In cases of a child accidentally ingesting melatonin, doctors often ask a reliable adult to monitor them at home.

Dr. Cora Collette Breuner, with the Seattle Children’s Hospital at the University of Washington, told CNN that parents should speak with a doctor before giving their children the supplement.

“I also tell families, this is not something your child should take forever. Nobody knows what the long-term effects of taking this is on your child’s growth and development,” she told the outlet. “Taking away blue-light-emitting smartphones, tablets, laptops, and television at least two hours before bed will keep melatonin production humming along, as will reading or listening to bedtime stories in a softly lit room, taking a warm bath, or doing light stretches.”

In 2022, researchers found that in 2021, U.S. poison control centers received more than 52,000 calls about children consuming worrisome amounts of the dietary supplement. That’s a six-fold increase from about a decade earlier. Most such calls are about young children who accidentally got into bottles of melatonin, some of which come in the form of gummies for kids, the report said.

Dr. Karima Lelak, an emergency physician at Children’s Hospital of Michigan and the lead author of the study published in 2022 by the CDC, found that in about 83 percent of those calls, the children did not show any symptoms.

However, other children had vomiting, altered breathing, or other symptoms. Over the 10 years studied, more than 4,000 children were hospitalized, five were put on machines to help them breathe, and two children under the age of two died. Most of the hospitalized children were teenagers, and many of those ingestions were thought to be suicide attempts.

Those researchers also suggested that COVID-19 lockdowns and virtual learning forced more children to be at home all day, meaning there were more opportunities for kids to access melatonin. Also, those restrictions may have caused sleep-disrupting stress and anxiety, leading more families to consider melatonin, they suggested.

The Associated Press contributed to this report.

Tyler Durden Mon, 03/11/2024 - 21:40

Read More

Continue Reading

International

Red Candle In The Wind

Red Candle In The Wind

By Benjamin PIcton of Rabobank

February non-farm payrolls superficially exceeded market expectations on Friday by…

Published

on

Red Candle In The Wind

By Benjamin PIcton of Rabobank

February non-farm payrolls superficially exceeded market expectations on Friday by printing at 275,000 against a consensus call of 200,000. We say superficially, because the downward revisions to prior months totalled 167,000 for December and January, taking the total change in employed persons well below the implied forecast, and helping the unemployment rate to pop two-ticks to 3.9%. The U6 underemployment rate also rose from 7.2% to 7.3%, while average hourly earnings growth fell to 0.2% m-o-m and average weekly hours worked languished at 34.3, equalling pre-pandemic lows.

Undeterred by the devil in the detail, the algos sprang into action once exchanges opened. Market darling NVIDIA hit a new intraday high of $974 before (presumably) the humans took over and sold the stock down more than 10% to close at $875.28. If our suspicions are correct that it was the AIs buying before the humans started selling (no doubt triggering trailing stops on the way down), the irony is not lost on us.

The 1-day chart for NVIDIA now makes for interesting viewing, because the red candle posted on Friday presents quite a strong bearish engulfing signal. Volume traded on the day was almost double the 15-day simple moving average, and similar price action is observable on the 1-day charts for both Intel and AMD. Regular readers will be aware that we have expressed incredulity in the past about the durability the AI thematic melt-up, so it will be interesting to see whether Friday’s sell off is just a profit-taking blip, or a genuine trend reversal.

AI equities aside, this week ought to be important for markets because the BTFP program expires today. That means that the Fed will no longer be loaning cash to the banking system in exchange for collateral pledged at-par. The KBW Regional Banking index has so far taken this in its stride and is trading 30% above the lows established during the mini banking crisis of this time last year, but the Fed’s liquidity facility was effectively an exercise in can-kicking that makes regional banks a sector of the market worth paying attention to in the weeks ahead. Even here in Sydney, regulators are warning of external risks posed to the banking sector from scheduled refinancing of commercial real estate loans following sharp falls in valuations.

Markets are sending signals in other sectors, too. Gold closed at a new record-high of $2178/oz on Friday after trading above $2200/oz briefly. Gold has been going ballistic since the Friday before last, posting gains even on days where 2-year Treasury yields have risen. Gold bugs are buying as real yields fall from the October highs and inflation breakevens creep higher. This is particularly interesting as gold ETFs have been recording net outflows; suggesting that price gains aren’t being driven by a retail pile-in. Are gold buyers now betting on a stagflationary outcome where the Fed cuts without inflation being anchored at the 2% target? The price action around the US CPI release tomorrow ought to be illuminating.

Leaving the day-to-day movements to one side, we are also seeing further signs of structural change at the macro level. The UK budget last week included a provision for the creation of a British ISA. That is, an Individual Savings Account that provides tax breaks to savers who invest their money in the stock of British companies. This follows moves last year to encourage pension funds to head up the risk curve by allocating 5% of their capital to unlisted investments.

As a Hail Mary option for a government cruising toward an electoral drubbing it’s a curious choice, but it’s worth highlighting as cash-strapped governments increasingly see private savings pools as a funding solution for their spending priorities.

Of course, the UK is not alone in making creeping moves towards financial repression. In contrast to announcements today of increased trade liberalisation, Australian Treasurer Jim Chalmers has in the recent past flagged his interest in tapping private pension savings to fund state spending priorities, including defence, public housing and renewable energy projects. Both the UK and Australia appear intent on finding ways to open up the lungs of their economies, but government wants more say in directing private capital flows for state goals.

So, how far is the blurring of the lines between free markets and state planning likely to go? Given the immense and varied budgetary (and security) pressures that governments are facing, could we see a re-up of WWII-era Victory bonds, where private investors are encouraged to do their patriotic duty by directly financing government at negative real rates?

That would really light a fire under the gold market.

Tyler Durden Mon, 03/11/2024 - 19:00

Read More

Continue Reading

Spread & Containment

Fauci Deputy Warned Him Against Vaccine Mandates: Email

Fauci Deputy Warned Him Against Vaccine Mandates: Email

Authored by Zachary Stieber via The Epoch Times (emphasis ours),

Mandating COVID-19…

Published

on

Fauci Deputy Warned Him Against Vaccine Mandates: Email

Authored by Zachary Stieber via The Epoch Times (emphasis ours),

Mandating COVID-19 vaccination was a mistake due to ethical and other concerns, a top government doctor warned Dr. Anthony Fauci after Dr. Fauci promoted mass vaccination.

Coercing or forcing people to take a vaccine can have negative consequences from a biological, sociological, psychological, economical, and ethical standpoint and is not worth the cost even if the vaccine is 100% safe,” Dr. Matthew Memoli, director of the Laboratory of Infectious Diseases clinical studies unit at the U.S. National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), told Dr. Fauci in an email.

“A more prudent approach that considers these issues would be to focus our efforts on those at high risk of severe disease and death, such as the elderly and obese, and do not push vaccination on the young and healthy any further.”

Dr. Anthony Fauci, ex-director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID. in Washington on Jan. 8, 2024. (Madalina Vasiliu/The Epoch Times)

Employing that strategy would help prevent loss of public trust and political capital, Dr. Memoli said.

The email was sent on July 30, 2021, after Dr. Fauci, director of the NIAID, claimed that communities would be safer if more people received one of the COVID-19 vaccines and that mass vaccination would lead to the end of the COVID-19 pandemic.

“We’re on a really good track now to really crush this outbreak, and the more people we get vaccinated, the more assuredness that we’re going to have that we’re going to be able to do that,” Dr. Fauci said on CNN the month prior.

Dr. Memoli, who has studied influenza vaccination for years, disagreed, telling Dr. Fauci that research in the field has indicated yearly shots sometimes drive the evolution of influenza.

Vaccinating people who have not been infected with COVID-19, he said, could potentially impact the evolution of the virus that causes COVID-19 in unexpected ways.

“At best what we are doing with mandated mass vaccination does nothing and the variants emerge evading immunity anyway as they would have without the vaccine,” Dr. Memoli wrote. “At worst it drives evolution of the virus in a way that is different from nature and possibly detrimental, prolonging the pandemic or causing more morbidity and mortality than it should.”

The vaccination strategy was flawed because it relied on a single antigen, introducing immunity that only lasted for a certain period of time, Dr. Memoli said. When the immunity weakened, the virus was given an opportunity to evolve.

Some other experts, including virologist Geert Vanden Bossche, have offered similar views. Others in the scientific community, such as U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention scientists, say vaccination prevents virus evolution, though the agency has acknowledged it doesn’t have records supporting its position.

Other Messages

Dr. Memoli sent the email to Dr. Fauci and two other top NIAID officials, Drs. Hugh Auchincloss and Clifford Lane. The message was first reported by the Wall Street Journal, though the publication did not publish the message. The Epoch Times obtained the email and 199 other pages of Dr. Memoli’s emails through a Freedom of Information Act request. There were no indications that Dr. Fauci ever responded to Dr. Memoli.

Later in 2021, the NIAID’s parent agency, the U.S. National Institutes of Health (NIH), and all other federal government agencies began requiring COVID-19 vaccination, under direction from President Joe Biden.

In other messages, Dr. Memoli said the mandates were unethical and that he was hopeful legal cases brought against the mandates would ultimately let people “make their own healthcare decisions.”

“I am certainly doing everything in my power to influence that,” he wrote on Nov. 2, 2021, to an unknown recipient. Dr. Memoli also disclosed that both he and his wife had applied for exemptions from the mandates imposed by the NIH and his wife’s employer. While her request had been granted, his had not as of yet, Dr. Memoli said. It’s not clear if it ever was.

According to Dr. Memoli, officials had not gone over the bioethics of the mandates. He wrote to the NIH’s Department of Bioethics, pointing out that the protection from the vaccines waned over time, that the shots can cause serious health issues such as myocarditis, or heart inflammation, and that vaccinated people were just as likely to spread COVID-19 as unvaccinated people.

He cited multiple studies in his emails, including one that found a resurgence of COVID-19 cases in a California health care system despite a high rate of vaccination and another that showed transmission rates were similar among the vaccinated and unvaccinated.

Dr. Memoli said he was “particularly interested in the bioethics of a mandate when the vaccine doesn’t have the ability to stop spread of the disease, which is the purpose of the mandate.”

The message led to Dr. Memoli speaking during an NIH event in December 2021, several weeks after he went public with his concerns about mandating vaccines.

“Vaccine mandates should be rare and considered only with a strong justification,” Dr. Memoli said in the debate. He suggested that the justification was not there for COVID-19 vaccines, given their fleeting effectiveness.

Julie Ledgerwood, another NIAID official who also spoke at the event, said that the vaccines were highly effective and that the side effects that had been detected were not significant. She did acknowledge that vaccinated people needed boosters after a period of time.

The NIH, and many other government agencies, removed their mandates in 2023 with the end of the COVID-19 public health emergency.

A request for comment from Dr. Fauci was not returned. Dr. Memoli told The Epoch Times in an email he was “happy to answer any questions you have” but that he needed clearance from the NIAID’s media office. That office then refused to give clearance.

Dr. Jay Bhattacharya, a professor of health policy at Stanford University, said that Dr. Memoli showed bravery when he warned Dr. Fauci against mandates.

“Those mandates have done more to demolish public trust in public health than any single action by public health officials in my professional career, including diminishing public trust in all vaccines.” Dr. Bhattacharya, a frequent critic of the U.S. response to COVID-19, told The Epoch Times via email. “It was risky for Dr. Memoli to speak publicly since he works at the NIH, and the culture of the NIH punishes those who cross powerful scientific bureaucrats like Dr. Fauci or his former boss, Dr. Francis Collins.”

Tyler Durden Mon, 03/11/2024 - 17:40

Read More

Continue Reading

Trending