Connect with us

Government

US Yields Push Higher, Lifting the Greenback Especially Against the Euro and Yen

 Overview:  The US 10-year yield is at new highs since January 2020, pressing above 1.77% and helping pull up global yields today.   European benchmarks yields are up 4-5 bp, and the Antipodean yields jump 8-9 bp.  The impact on equities has been…

Published

on

 Overview:  The US 10-year yield is at new highs since January 2020, pressing above 1.77% and helping pull up global yields today.   European benchmarks yields are up 4-5 bp, and the Antipodean yields jump 8-9 bp.  The impact on equities has been minor, and the talk is still about the unwinding of Archegos Capital.  Most large markets in the Asia Pacific region rose, with the notable exception of Australia.  South Korea and New Zealand led the region.  Europe's Dow Jones Stoxx 600 is at a new high in over a year, while US futures are mixed.  The dollar has rallied above JPY110 for the first time since last March, and the euro has been pressed below $1.1735.  Sterling and the dollar bloc are showing some resilience.  Most emerging market currencies are lower.  Turkey's Erdogan fired the deputy governor of the central bank (and replaced him with a former executive of Morgan Stanley), and the Turkish lira has approached last week's extreme.  The Chinese yuan managed to eke out a small gain in the mainland markets.  The JP Morgan Emerging Market Currency Index is off for a third session.  After dropping nearly 1.2% yesterday, gold is off another 0.75% and below $1700 for the first time in three weeks.  Oil prices initially extended yesterday's recovery, and May WTI rose to an eight-day high near $62.25 before retreating to almost $61.00.  OPEC+ meets on April 1 and is not expected to alter its output, though Russia and Kazakhastan are thought to be pressing for increased quotas.  US oil inventories are expected to have fallen last week for the first time in six weeks.  

Asia Pacific

The Australian government let the JobKeeper program expire.  There seem to be compelling reasons.  Australia lost about 378k full-time positions as the pandemic struck last year, and 358k have returned.  The participation rate since last October has been 66.1% compared with 65.9% in December 2019.  Yet, the unemployment rate, which was at 5.1% in February 2020, was at 5.8% in February 2021.  Part of the improvement was flattered by the JobKeeper initiative, which had been extended twice.  Reports suggest around 900k workers were still getting a wage subsidy as the program ended, and more than 10% will likely lose their jobs.  The Reserve Bank is putting greater weight on the labor market in setting monetary policy, and this will likely be underscored at next week's (April 6) RBA meeting.  The new six-month round of A$100 bln bond-buying program begins mid-April.

FTSE Russell confirmed yesterday that it would add Chinese bonds to its World Government Bond Index.  The inclusion will begin at the end of October and gradually increase to 5.25%-weighting over the next three years.  This period seems longer than many would have anticipated.  It will be the sixth-largest component when finished.  Broadly, this is how Chinese markets are becoming more integrated into the global capital markets:  benchmark inclusion and the rise of passive investment. When it comes to equities, Americans are sensitive to companies tied to China's military, but bonds appear to be a different matter.  Separately, FTSE Russell says it will consider adding India and Saudi Arabia to its emerging market bond index.  

Japan's unemployment rate remained at 2.9% in February, defying expectations for an increase, though the job-to-application ratio slipped, as anticipated to 1.09 from 1.10.  However, the more significant surprise was the 3.1% rise in February retail sales. The expected 0.8% increase was blown away by the 3.1% surge reported.  Even when considering the downward revision in the January series to -1.7% from -0.5%, the February report was impressive.  It was the first increase in three months and was the biggest since last June when its first state of emergency was lifted.  While demand for durable goods appeared robust, the report may overstate the strength of consumption because it does not capture the drop in spending on services.  Still, economists may pare forecasts of a contraction here in Q1.  

After consolidating in its pre-weekend range yesterday, the dollar has been lifted through JPY110 with the help of rising US yields.  It is the highest the dollar has been since last March when it recorded a high near JPY111.70.  In February 2020, the dollar spiked to almost JPY112.25.  Support will likely now be encountered in the JPY109.85-JPY110.00 area.  The Australian dollar is steady.  It made a five-day high near $0.7665 but has eased back and found support in the $0.7625 area, just below where it settled yesterday.  It needs to resurface above the $0.7670, and ideally $0.7700, to lift the tone.  The US dollar initially extended its gains against the Chinese yuan, reaching almost CNY6.58 before yielding to selling pressure and falling to session lows near CNY6.5640.  The reference rate was set at CNY6.5641, which was in line with bank estimates.  The PBOC does not appear to be causing the yuan's weakness, but it has not appeared to be resisting it.  

Europe

The preliminary estimate of March eurozone inflation will be reported tomorrow.  Germany and Spain reported their preliminary figures earlier today.  Spain reported a larger than expected rise.  The harmonized measure jumped 1.9% in the month and lifted the year-over-year rate to 1.2% from -0.1% in February.  German states have reported an increase, and the national harmonized figure is due shortly.  It is expected to have risen by 0.5% in March for a 2.0% year-over-year gain.  There may be upside risks on the aggregate figures after a 0.9% year-over-year increase in February, unchanged from January.  Recall that in the last four months of 2020, the year-over-year rate was negative 0.3%. The median forecast in Bloomberg's survey is for a 1.4% rise.  ECB President Lagarde went through the litany of "technical and transitory" factors that are behind the apparent rise in price pressures, including the end of the German VAT holiday, base effect from energy prices, shifting seasonal sales in France and Italy, and adjustment of the basket of goods and services that are being measured. 

At her press conference following the ECB meeting on March 11, Lagarde announced that the ECB would significantly expand its bond-buying under the flexible Pandemic Emergency Purchase Program.  She was not about to be pinned down by journalists to specify the meaning.  With two weeks of data in, the significant buying appears to be around a 33%  increase.  From July through last month, the ECB averaged weekly purchases of about 15 bln euros a week.  The average since the recent ECB meeting looks closer to 20 bln euros.  

The euro settled in North America yesterday near session lows (~$1.1765) and, after a slow start in Asia Pacific turnover, lurched lower and fell a little below $1.1735 before European markets opened.  An initial attempt to recover stalled near $1.1750.  There is an option for almost 700 mln euros at $1.1740 that expires today, but it has likely been neutralized.  Although there may be some support around $1.1700, the risk extends toward $1.16, which it last saw as the polls in the US were closing last November.  Sterling also settled on its lows yesterday.  However, selling pressure was more modest than on the euro.  It slipped through yesterday's $1.3755 in late Asia turnover and fell to almost $1.3740 before European bids were found.  Yet, selling pressure capped it near $1.3780.  Last week's lows were in the $1.3670-$1.3675 area.  

America

While several US states have relaxed public health rules much to the chagrin of the CDC and are experiencing an increase in the contagion, the vaccinations are accelerating with over three million inoculations a day. The Biden Administration says that 90% of US adults will be eligible for the vaccine by April 19, and 90% of the country will be within five miles of a vaccination site.  

The North American economic calendar is light today.  The US reports S&P CoreLogic house prices for January.  In December, its national indicators showed house prices increased by nearly 10.4% last year.  The Conference Board's consumer confidence measure is also on tap.  Attention will turn to the labor market tomorrow with the ADP estimate and Thursday's weekly initial jobless claims, ahead of Friday's national figures, where around 650k of job growth is expected.  The Fed's Quarles and Williams speak today.  President Biden's speech in Pittsburgh tomorrow will unveil details of his infrastructure proposal, which is expected to include some tax hikes.  Canada reports January GDP tomorrow.  Mexico reports reserves and budget figures today.  Note that Brazil reports inflation figures today (IGPM), producer prices, and the central government's budget balance.  However, the government shake-up, includes the ministers of defense, foreign affairs, and justice.  The cabinet changes seem driven by the public backlash against the government dealing with the pandemic.  

The US dollar is little changed against the Canadian dollar, trading comfortably inside yesterday's range (~CAD1.2570-CAD1.2625).  The greenback found a base in the second half of last week in the CAD1.2540-CAD1.2550 area.  Below there support is seen near CAD1.2500.  On the top side, the CAD1.2625-CAD1.2630 area looks like a good cap.  The US dollar is also inside yesterday's range against the Mexican peso (~MXN20.56-MXB20.79).  A consolidative session is likely, but the risk seems on the dollar's upside.  The greenback finished just above BRL5.78 yesterday.  The year's high was set on March 9 near BRL5.8745, while last year's high was recorded in mid-May near BRL5.9715.  The larger than expected 75 bp rate hike on March 17 (lifting the Selic rate to 2.75%) does not seem sufficient to prevent the real from falling to new lows.  


Disclaimer

Read More

Continue Reading

Government

Buried Project Veritas Recording Shows Top Pfizer Scientists Suppressed Concerns Over COVID-19 Boosters, MRNA Tech

Buried Project Veritas Recording Shows Top Pfizer Scientists Suppressed Concerns Over COVID-19 Boosters, MRNA Tech

Submitted by Liam Cosgrove

Former…

Published

on

Buried Project Veritas Recording Shows Top Pfizer Scientists Suppressed Concerns Over COVID-19 Boosters, MRNA Tech

Submitted by Liam Cosgrove

Former Project Veritas & O’Keefe Media Group operative and Pfizer formulation analyst scientist Justin Leslie revealed previously unpublished recordings showing Pfizer’s top vaccine researchers discussing major concerns surrounding COVID-19 vaccines. Leslie delivered these recordings to Veritas in late 2021, but they were never published:

Featured in Leslie’s footage is Kanwal Gill, a principal scientist at Pfizer. Gill was weary of MRNA technology given its long research history yet lack of approved commercial products. She called the vaccines “sneaky,” suggesting latent side effects could emerge in time.

Gill goes on to illustrate how the vaccine formulation process was dramatically rushed under the FDA’s Emergency Use Authorization and adds that profit incentives likely played a role:

"It’s going to affect my heart, and I’m going to die. And nobody’s talking about that."

Leslie recorded another colleague, Pfizer’s pharmaceutical formulation scientist Ramin Darvari, who raised the since-validated concern that repeat booster intake could damage the cardiovascular system:

None of these claims will be shocking to hear in 2024, but it is telling that high-level Pfizer researchers were discussing these topics in private while the company assured the public of “no serious safety concerns” upon the jab’s release:

Vaccine for Children is a Different Formulation

Leslie sent me a little-known FDA-Pfizer conference — a 7-hour Zoom meeting published in tandem with the approval of the vaccine for 5 – 11 year-olds — during which Pfizer’s vice presidents of vaccine research and development, Nicholas Warne and William Gruber, discussed a last-minute change to the vaccine’s “buffer” — from “PBS” to “Tris” — to improve its shelf life. For about 30 seconds of these 7 hours, Gruber acknowledged that the new formula was NOT the one used in clinical trials (emphasis mine):


“The studies were done using the same volume… but contained the PBS buffer. We obviously had extensive consultations with the FDA and it was determined that the clinical studies were not required because, again, the LNP and the MRNA are the same and the behavior — in terms of reactogenicity and efficacy — are expected to be the same.

According to Leslie, the tweaked “buffer” dramatically changed the temperature needed for storage: “Before they changed this last step of the formulation, the formula was to be kept at -80 degrees Celsius. After they changed the last step, we kept them at 2 to 8 degrees celsius,” Leslie told me.

The claims are backed up in the referenced video presentation:

I’m no vaccinologist but an 80-degree temperature delta — and a 5x shelf-life in a warmer climate — seems like a significant change that might warrant clinical trials before commercial release.

Despite this information technically being public, there has been virtually no media scrutiny or even coverage — and in fact, most were told the vaccine for children was the same formula but just a smaller dose — which is perhaps due to a combination of the information being buried within a 7-hour jargon-filled presentation and our media being totally dysfunctional.

Bohemian Grove?

Leslie’s 2-hour long documentary on his experience at both Pfizer and O’Keefe’s companies concludes on an interesting note: James O’Keefe attended an outing at the Bohemian Grove.

Leslie offers this photo of James’ Bohemian Grove “GATE” slip as evidence, left on his work desk atop a copy of his book, “American Muckraker”:

My thoughts on the Bohemian Grove: my good friend’s dad was its general manager for several decades. From what I have gathered through that connection, the Bohemian Grove is not some version of the Illuminati, at least not in the institutional sense.

Do powerful elites hangout there? Absolutely. Do they discuss their plans for the world while hanging out there? I’m sure it has happened. Do they have a weird ritual with a giant owl? Yep, Alex Jones showed that to the world.

My perspective is based on conversations with my friend and my belief that his father is not lying to him. I could be wrong and am open to evidence — like if boxer Ryan Garcia decides to produce evidence regarding his rape claims — and I do find it a bit strange the club would invite O’Keefe who is notorious for covertly filming, but Occam’s razor would lead me to believe the club is — as it was under my friend’s dad — run by boomer conservatives the extent of whose politics include disliking wokeness, immigration, and Biden (common subjects of O’Keefe’s work).

Therefore, I don’t find O’Keefe’s visit to the club indicative that he is some sort of Operation Mockingbird asset as Leslie tries to depict (however Mockingbird is a 100% legitimate conspiracy). I have also met James several times and even came close to joining OMG. While I disagreed with James on the significance of many of his stories — finding some to be overhyped and showy — I never doubted his conviction in them.

As for why Leslie’s story was squashed… all my sources told me it was to avoid jail time for Veritas executives.

Feel free to watch Leslie’s full documentary here and decide for yourself.

Fun fact — Justin Leslie was also the operative behind this mega-viral Project Veritas story where Pfizer’s director of R&D claimed the company was privately mutating COVID-19 behind closed doors:

Tyler Durden Tue, 03/12/2024 - 13:40

Read More

Continue Reading

International

Association of prenatal vitamins and metals with epigenetic aging at birth and in childhood

“[…] our findings support the hypothesis that the intrauterine environment, particularly essential and non-essential metals, affect epigenetic aging…

Published

on

“[…] our findings support the hypothesis that the intrauterine environment, particularly essential and non-essential metals, affect epigenetic aging biomarkers across the life course.”

Credit: 2024 Bozack et al.

“[…] our findings support the hypothesis that the intrauterine environment, particularly essential and non-essential metals, affect epigenetic aging biomarkers across the life course.”

BUFFALO, NY- March 12, 2024 – A new research paper was published in Aging (listed by MEDLINE/PubMed as “Aging (Albany NY)” and “Aging-US” by Web of Science) Volume 16, Issue 4, entitled, “Associations of prenatal one-carbon metabolism nutrients and metals with epigenetic aging biomarkers at birth and in childhood in a US cohort.”

Epigenetic gestational age acceleration (EGAA) at birth and epigenetic age acceleration (EAA) in childhood may be biomarkers of the intrauterine environment. In this new study, researchers Anne K. Bozack, Sheryl L. Rifas-Shiman, Andrea A. Baccarelli, Robert O. Wright, Diane R. Gold, Emily Oken, Marie-France Hivert, and Andres Cardenas from Stanford University School of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Columbia University, and Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai investigated the extent to which first-trimester folate, B12, 5 essential and 7 non-essential metals in maternal circulation are associated with EGAA and EAA in early life. 

“[…] we hypothesized that OCM [one-carbon metabolism] nutrients and essential metals would be positively associated with EGAA and non-essential metals would be negatively associated with EGAA. We also investigated nonlinear associations and associations with mixtures of micronutrients and metals.”

Bohlin EGAA and Horvath pan-tissue and skin and blood EAA were calculated using DNA methylation measured in cord blood (N=351) and mid-childhood blood (N=326; median age = 7.7 years) in the Project Viva pre-birth cohort. A one standard deviation increase in individual essential metals (copper, manganese, and zinc) was associated with 0.94-1.2 weeks lower Horvath EAA at birth, and patterns of exposures identified by exploratory factor analysis suggested that a common source of essential metals was associated with Horvath EAA. The researchers also observed evidence of nonlinear associations of zinc with Bohlin EGAA, magnesium and lead with Horvath EAA, and cesium with skin and blood EAA at birth. Overall, associations at birth did not persist in mid-childhood; however, arsenic was associated with greater EAA at birth and in childhood. 

“Prenatal metals, including essential metals and arsenic, are associated with epigenetic aging in early life, which might be associated with future health.”

 

Read the full paper: DOI: https://doi.org/10.18632/aging.205602 

Corresponding Author: Andres Cardenas

Corresponding Email: andres.cardenas@stanford.edu 

Keywords: epigenetic age acceleration, metals, folate, B12, prenatal exposures

Click here to sign up for free Altmetric alerts about this article.

 

About Aging:

Launched in 2009, Aging publishes papers of general interest and biological significance in all fields of aging research and age-related diseases, including cancer—and now, with a special focus on COVID-19 vulnerability as an age-dependent syndrome. Topics in Aging go beyond traditional gerontology, including, but not limited to, cellular and molecular biology, human age-related diseases, pathology in model organisms, signal transduction pathways (e.g., p53, sirtuins, and PI-3K/AKT/mTOR, among others), and approaches to modulating these signaling pathways.

Please visit our website at www.Aging-US.com​​ and connect with us:

  • Facebook
  • X, formerly Twitter
  • Instagram
  • YouTube
  • LinkedIn
  • Reddit
  • Pinterest
  • Spotify, and available wherever you listen to podcasts

 

Click here to subscribe to Aging publication updates.

For media inquiries, please contact media@impactjournals.com.

 

Aging (Aging-US) Journal Office

6666 E. Quaker Str., Suite 1B

Orchard Park, NY 14127

Phone: 1-800-922-0957, option 1

###


Read More

Continue Reading

International

A beginner’s guide to the taxes you’ll hear about this election season

Everything you need to know about income tax, national insurance and more.

Cast Of Thousands/Shutterstock

National insurance, income tax, VAT, capital gains tax, inheritance tax… it’s easy to get confused about the many different ways we contribute to the cost of running the country. The budget announcement is the key time each year when the government shares its financial plans with us all, and announces changes that may make a tangible difference to what you pay.

But you’ll likely be hearing a lot more about taxes in the coming months – promises to cut or raise them are an easy win (or lose) for politicians in an election year. We may even get at least one “mini-budget”.

If you’ve recently entered the workforce or the housing market, you may still be wrapping your mind around all of these terms. Here is what you need to know about the different types of taxes and how they affect you.

The UK broadly uses three ways to collect tax:

1. When you earn money

If you are an employee or own a business, taxes are deducted from your salary or profits you make. For most people, this happens in two ways: income tax, and national insurance contributions (or NICs).

If you are self-employed, you will have to pay your taxes via an annual tax return assessment. You might also have to pay taxes this way for interest you earn on savings, dividends (distribution of profits from a company or shares you own) received and most other forms of income not taxed before you get it.

Around two-thirds of taxes collected come from people’s or business’ incomes in the UK.

2. When you spend money

VAT and excise duties are taxes on most goods and services you buy, with some exceptions like books and children’s clothing. About 20% of the total tax collected is VAT.

3. Taxes on wealth and assets

These are mainly taxes on the money you earn if you sell assets (like property or stocks) for more than you bought them for, or when you pass on assets in an inheritance. In the latter case in the UK, the recipient doesn’t pay this, it is the estate paying it out that must cover this if due. These taxes contribute only about 3% to the total tax collected.

You also likely have to pay council tax, which is set by the council you live in based on the value of your house or flat. It is paid by the user of the property, no matter if you own or rent. If you are a full-time student or on some apprenticeship schemes, you may get a deduction or not have to pay council tax at all.


Quarter life, a series by The Conversation

This article is part of Quarter Life, a series about issues affecting those of us in our 20s and 30s. From the challenges of beginning a career and taking care of our mental health, to the excitement of starting a family, adopting a pet or just making friends as an adult. The articles in this series explore the questions and bring answers as we navigate this turbulent period of life.

You may be interested in:

If you get your financial advice on social media, watch out for misinformation

Future graduates will pay more in student loan repayments – and the poorest will be worst affected

Selling on Vinted, Etsy or eBay? Here’s what you need to know about paying tax


Put together, these totalled almost £790 billion in 2022-23, which the government spends on public services such as the NHS, schools and social care. The government collects taxes from all sources and sets its spending plans accordingly, borrowing to make up any difference between the two.

Income tax

The amount of income tax you pay is determined by where your income sits in a series of “bands” set by the government. Almost everyone is entitled to a “personal allowance”, currently £12,570, which you can earn without needing to pay any income tax.

You then pay 20% in tax on each pound of income you earn (across all sources) from £12,570-£50,270. You pay 40% on each extra pound up to £125,140 and 45% over this. If you earn more than £100,000, the personal allowance (amount of untaxed income) starts to decrease.

If you are self-employed, the same rates apply to you. You just don’t have an employer to take this off your salary each month. Instead, you have to make sure you have enough money at the end of the year to pay this directly to the government.


Read more: Taxes aren't just about money – they shape how we think about each other


The government can increase the threshold limits to adjust for inflation. This tries to ensure any wage rise you get in response to higher prices doesn’t lead to you having to pay a higher tax rate. However, the government announced in 2021 that they would freeze these thresholds until 2026 (extended now to 2028), arguing that it would help repay the costs of the pandemic.

Given wages are now rising for many to help with the cost of living crisis, this means many people will pay more income tax this coming year than they did before. This is sometimes referred to as “fiscal drag” – where lower earners are “dragged” into paying higher tax rates, or being taxed on more of their income.

National insurance

National insurance contributions (NICs) are a second “tax” you pay on your income – or to be precise, on your earned income (your salary). You don’t pay this on some forms of income, including savings or dividends, and you also don’t pay it once you reach state retirement age (currently 66).

While Jeremy Hunt, the current chancellor of the exchequer, didn’t adjust income tax meaningfully in this year’s budget, he did announce a cut to NICs. This was a surprise to many, as we had already seen rates fall from 12% to 10% on incomes higher than £242/week in January. It will now fall again to 8% from April.


Read more: Budget 2024: experts explain what it means for taxpayers, businesses, borrowers and the NHS


While this is charged separately to income tax, in reality it all just goes into one pot with other taxes. Some, including the chancellor, say it is time to merge these two deductions and make this simpler for everyone. In his budget speech this year, Hunt said he’d like to see this tax go entirely. He thinks this isn’t fair on those who have to pay it, as it is only charged on some forms of income and on some workers.

I wouldn’t hold my breath for this to happen however, and even if it did, there are huge sums linked to NICs (nearly £180bn last year) so it would almost certainly have to be collected from elsewhere (such as via an increase in income taxes, or a lot more borrowing) to make sure the government could still balance its books.

A young black man sits at a home office desk with his feet up, looking at a mobile phone
Do you know how much tax you pay? Alex from the Rock/Shutterstock

Other taxes

There are likely to be further tweaks to the UK’s tax system soon, perhaps by the current government before the election – and almost certainly if there is a change of government.

Wealth taxes may be in line for a change. In the budget, the chancellor reduced capital gains taxes on sales of assets such as second properties (from 28% to 24%). These types of taxes provide only a limited amount of money to the government, as quite high thresholds apply for inheritance tax (up to £1 million if you are passing on a family home).

There are calls from many quarters though to look again at these types of taxes. Wealth inequality (the differences between total wealth held by the richest compared to the poorest) in the UK is very high (much higher than income inequality) and rising.

But how to do this effectively is a matter of much debate. A recent study suggested a one-off tax on total wealth held over a certain threshold might work. But wealth taxes are challenging to make work in practice, and both main political parties have already said this isn’t an option they are considering currently.

Andy Lymer and his colleagues at the Centre for Personal Financial Wellbeing at Aston University currently or have recently received funding for their research work from a variety of funding bodies including the UK's Money and Pension Service, the Aviva Foundation, Fair4All Finance, NEST Insight, the Gambling Commission, Vivid Housing and the ESRC, amongst others.

Read More

Continue Reading

Trending