Connect with us

Spread & Containment

US Futures Dip As European Stocks Finally Erase All Pandemic Losses, Hit Record High

US Futures Dip As European Stocks Finally Erase All Pandemic Losses, Hit Record High

Global stocks hit record highs on Tuesday, supported by strong economic data from China and the United States, although US equity futures slipped as concern.

Published

on

US Futures Dip As European Stocks Finally Erase All Pandemic Losses, Hit Record High

Global stocks hit record highs on Tuesday, supported by strong economic data from China and the United States, although US equity futures slipped as concern China is curtailing loan growth tempered optimism stoked by the U.S. economic rebound.  Nasdaq underperformed as investors locked in some gains on renewed reflation concerns hopes while currency and bond markets paused for breath after a month of rapid gains in the dollar and Treasury yields. At 715 a.m. ET, Dow E-minis were down 41 points, or 0.11%, S&P 500 E-minis were down 8 points, or 0.20% and Nasdaq 100 E-minis were down 11.5 points, or 0.23%.

Apple stock dipped after a rare downgrade from Morgan Stanley cut the price target on the world's largest company from $164 to $156, citing multiple compression (it kept the Overweight target).

In the past few days, tech and other growth stocks had awakened after lagging in recent weeks behind value stocks expected to outperform as the economy emerges from the coronavirus pandemic. The tech-heavy Nasdaq is now about 3% from its February record high after falling as much as 12% from that level.

Stocks tied to the Archegos collapse fell in pre-market trading as Credit Suisse hit the market with block trades that totaled more than $2 billion. 34 million shares in ViacomCBS were offered on Monday, 14 million shares of Vipshop and 11 million shares of Farfetch. Still, that’s only a fraction of the size traded by banks at the end of March. ViacomCBS slipped 2.2% and Vipshop Holdings dropped 2.1% while Farfetch declined 2.1% after the Swiss bank unloaded shares.

Credit Suisse was down 0.3% as of 10:07 a.m. in Zurich after saying it will take a 4.4 billion-franc ($4.7 billion) writedown tied to the implosion of Archegos.

On the heels of a bumper U.S. jobs report on Friday, March ISM data showed services activity hit a record high. China’s service sector has also gathered steam with the sharpest increase in sales in three months: the Caixin China General Services Business Activity Index (headline services PMI) rose to 54.3 in March, 2.8pp higher than February. Sub-indexes suggest faster expansion of new business activity in the services sector.

“We think investors should not fear entering the market at all-time highs,” said Mark Haefele, Chief Investment Officer, UBS Global Wealth Management. “We recommend continuing to position for the reflation trade as the economic recovery gathers pace - data released Friday showed U.S. nonfarm payrolls surged by 916,000 in March, the biggest gain since August.“

“It looks like spectacular US data has a few caveats,” said Vishnu Varathan, head of economics and strategy at Mizuho Bank Ltd. in Singapore. “For one, there is a sense that vaccine differentials could just mean an uneven recovery. Worse, it could also mean having to deal with higher U.S. Treasury yields in a more fragile state,” especially for emerging markets, he said.

European stocks, meanwhile, erased pandemic losses and the pan-European STOXX 600 index hit a record high with miners among the biggest gainers thanks to copper surging as markets reopened after Monday’s holiday across the region.

The Stoxx 600 Basic Resources index rises as much as 2.5%, buoyed by gains for copper and aluminum. Copper prices jumped in the U.S. on Monday and in London after the Easter holiday, though gave up some of those gains following a reassurance from Chile that Covid restrictions won’t impact mining operations or exports.

Travel and leisure stocks also gained in Europe, catching up with U.S. peers after Monday’s holiday, while airlines were boosted by a lower oil price and U.K. pubs gain as government downplays need for vaccine passports to enter venues. British Airways-owner IAG was up 2.4%, Lufthansa +1.3%, EasyJet +0.9%, with crude futures down about 3% since Friday despite edging higher on Tuesday. Travel gains come despite industry body expressing disappointment over the U.K. government’s warning that the resumption of non-essential trips next month is not guaranteed.

Earlier in the session, Asian stocks fell, poised to snap a three-day winning streak, with Japan leading losses in the region after the yen climbed against the dollar overnight. Shares of electronics makers and automakers were the biggest drags on Japan’s benchmark Topix, which slid the most in almost two weeks. Suzuki Motor slumped the most since June, falling for a second day after saying that it’s halting two domestic plants in continued fallout of the global chip shortage. Equity benchmarks in the Philippines, Taiwan and Australia climbed, cushioning declines in the MSCI Asia Pacific Index, while markets in Hong Kong and Thailand were shut for holidays. Sector-wise, consumer discretionary and healthcare were the worst performers on the Asian gauge

China's CSI 300 index fell as trading resumed after Monday’s holiday, with losses in healthcare and consumption-linked sectors dragging the benchmark index lower from a four-week high. The CSI 300 Index ended down 0.4%, after jumping 1% in Friday’s session to close at its highest since March 5. The gauge climbed 2.5% last week, the most since the period ended Feb. 12. Liquor giant Kweichow Moutai Co. was the biggest drag on the index on Tuesday. “The market will consolidate to find its bottom,” following the recent gains, CICC analysts including Wang Hanfeng wrote in a note. Separately, analysts at Kaiyuan Securities said that Chinese mutual funds focused on large growth stocks are facing potentially big redemption pressure from individual investors after the recent rebound. China’s central bank asked the nation’s major lenders to curtail loan growth for the rest of this year after a surge in the first two months stoked bubble risks, Bloomberg reported. CSI’s subgauge of financials ended little changed. Daily turnover in Shanghai and Shenzhen dropped to 627.8 billion yuan ($96 billion), near a five-month low reached on Thursday. The CSI 300 has largely hovered around the key 5,000 mark for the past month or so after concerns over lofty valuations and potential liquidity tightening saw the gauge plunge into a technical correction in early March. It had reached a 13-year high the previous month

In rates, the yield on benchmark 10-year U.S. Treasuries fell to 1.6915% amid mounting concerns that the BIden infrastructure package will be substantially watered down. Treasury 10-year yields around 1.70% are near flat vs Monday’s close while long-end yields are marginally richer, flattening 5s30s by almost 1bp; bunds, gilts lag by around 3bp vs Treasuries. Treasury yields were back within a basis point of Monday’s closing levels, with long-end slightly outperforming, after rebounding from Asia-session lows. EGB markets are lower in first trading day since April 1.

The steadying Treasury yields and dollar follow a charge higher over the first quarter, with an 83 basis point rise in 10-year yields, the biggest quarterly gain in a dozen years, and a 3.6% rise in the dollar index - the sharpest since 2018.

“Bonds have settled down now,” said Omkar Joshi, portfolio manager at Opal Capital Management in Sydney, after a hard and fast selloff. “I think markets can keep powering on from here.”

In FX, the Bloomberg Dollar Spot Index advanced for the first day in four as the greenback rose against most of its Group-of-10 peers; the euro was little changed around $1.18 while the pound and Antipodean currencies were the worst performers in G-10. The Australian dollar declined after China’s central bank shifted its attention from pandemic to bubble risks. The aussie erased losses after the RBA reserved its decision over April to November curve control.

Minutes from the March meeting of the U.S. Federal Reserve, due on Wednesday, are the next focus for bond markets, although they will not address the most recent data surprises and markets have run far ahead of Fed projections for years of low rates. Fed funds futures have priced in a hike next year while eurodollar markets have it priced by December.

“What needs to be tested is how the Fed reinforces and reassures on its flexible average inflation target policy,” said Vishnu Varathan, head economist at Mizuho Bank in Singapore. “The dollar’s past few weeks of movement reflect markets moving ahead despite what the Fed has said.”

In commodities, oil rebounded as the chances of a breakthrough in talks to revive an Iranian nuclear accord were seen by analysts as slim, reducing the odds that crude flows from the country would pick up further in the near term. As a result, WTI crude futures rebounded about 2% to near $60/bbl after yesterday's rout; gold edges higher to $1,730/oz

Progress in President Joe Biden’s new infrastructure proposal and the start of the earnings season in the coming weeks could dictate the course of stock markets, analysts said. Later in the day, investors will turn to a reading of U.S. job openings for February. The data follows blowout employment as well as service sector reports for March.

Market Snapshot

  • S&P 500 futures down 0.2% to 4,059.00
  • German 10Y yield rose 3.2 bps to -0.296%
  • Euro little changed at $1.1805
  • Euro Stoxx 50 up 0.8% to 3976.11
  • MXAP down 0.3% to 206.39
  • MXAPJ up 0.3% to 690.58
  • Nikkei down 1.3% to 29,696.63
  • Topix down 1.5% to 1,954.34
  • Hang Seng Index up 2.0% to 28,938.74
  • Shanghai Composite little changed at 3,482.97
  • Sensex down 0.1% to 49,108.12
  • Australia S&P/ASX 200 up 0.8% to 6,885.86
  • Kospi up 0.2% to 3,127.08
  • Brent Futures up 2.1% to $63.43/bbl
  • Gold spot up 0.3% to $1,732.75
  • U.S. Dollar Index up 0.1% to 92.64

Top Overnight News from Bloomberg

  • Most European Union member states will have sufficient Covid vaccine supplies to immunize the majority of people by the end of June, much earlier than the bloc’s official target, according to an internal memo seen by Bloomberg
  • The tax plan President Joe Biden laid out last week will likely hit technology and pharmaceutical companies particularly hard, although the challenge for legislators will be to minimize loopholes that could diminish the impact, tax experts said
  • A burst of strong economic readings -- a mammoth job creation figure Friday and now a report from the Institute for Supply Management showing record growth in service industries -- is fueling bets that expectations for growth, not inflation, will dominate the narrative in Treasuries
  • China’s central bank asked the nation’s major lenders to curtail loan growth for the rest of this year after a surge in the first two months stoked bubble risks, according to people familiar with the matter
  • The leader of Chancellor Angela Merkel’s party reinforced his call for strict, short-term curbs to contain Germany’s resurgent outbreak, as he tries to gain backing for the plan

Quick look at global markets courtesy of Newsquawk

Asian equity markets traded mixed as the regional bourses failed to fully sustain the momentum from their counterparts on Wall St where the S&P 500 and the DJIA extended on fresh record highs in their first opportunity to react to last week’s blockbuster NFP jobs report and which was followed up by stronger-than-expected ISM Services PMI data. ASX 200 (+0.8%) rallied on return from the long weekend with gains spearheaded by tech after similar outperformance stateside, while shares in Cleanaway Waste Management surged by double-digit percentages on M&A news in which the Co. is to buy Suez’s Australian unit for around AUD 2.5bln. Nikkei 225 (-1.3%) retraced opening advances with sentiment clouded by a mixed currency and disappointing Household Spending data which contracted by 6.6% Y/Y. Shanghai Comp. (U/C) was also lacklustre despite stronger than expected Chinese Caixin Services PMI data which alongside Caixin Composite PMI, printed at their highest readings YTD, with the mainland subdued after the PBoC drained liquidity and amid reports China is said to have asked banks to curtail credit until year-end, while Hong Kong markets remained closed for holiday. Finally, 10yr JGBs were higher with prices supported amid weak domestic data and as Japanese stocks gave back initial gains, while prices also tracked the upside in T-note futures amid easing of yields and with improved results from the 30yr JGB auction.

Top Asian News

  • Australia Central Bank Holds as Housing Surge Comes to Fore
  • Bank Indonesia Sees No Immediate Need to Unwind Easy Policy
  • AirAsia Said to Plan $300 Million Funding Round for Digital Arm
  • Chinese Travel Rebounds During Holiday While Spending Still Lags

European equities kicked off the holiday-shortened trading week with gains across the board (Euro Stoxx 50 +0.8%) as the region plays catch-up to the fresh record levels seen on Wall St yesterday whereby the S&P 500 and the DJIA extended to record highs with impetus derived from the strong US jobs and ISM metrics. US equity futures, however, have diverged from the firmer performance across the pond and trade with incremental losses - with the cyclically-driven RTY (-0.4%) narrowly lagging peers. Sectors in Europe maintain the same picture seen at the cash open - with most sectors in the green, led by Basic Resources amid the rebound in base metals. European sectors see more of a pro-cyclical bias as the region mimics the sentiment seen state-side yesterday - with Autos, Banks, Travel & Leisure, and Oil & Gas among the top performers, while the more defensive Healthcare and Telecoms reside at the other end of the spectrum, with the latter also in negative territory. In terms of movers, the aforementioned rally in base metals sees miners driving the FTSE 100 (+1.2%), with Antofagasta (+3.8%), Rio Tinto (+3.6%), Glencore (+3.3%), and BHP (+3.2%) all among the top gainers. The miners in the index are closely followed by BP (+3.2%), who holds onto gains despite the recent fall in oil prices as the Co. now expects proceeds in 2021 to be at the top of the previously guided range of USD 4-6bln. BP also expects to have reached its net debt target of USD 35bln ahead of schedule in Q1, and on reaching this target, the oil giant is committed to returning at least 60% of surplus cash flow to shareholders by way of share buybacks. Away from the UK, SAP (+2.0%) is bolstered amid CNBC reports yesterday that Google is to stop using Oracle's finance software and use SAP's instead. Telefonica (+0.7%) bucks the downbeat Telecoms trend as it is to begin the bidding process for its submarine cable unit in a deal that could be valued around EUR 2bln. Air France-KLM (-0.7%) was choppy at the open after the EU Commission approved the EUR 4bln rescue plan - whereby opening gains were short-lived, potentially due to some of the strings attached to the package. Finally, Credit Suisse (+0.3%) trimmed earlier gains which were cited to the board overhaul as the group sees a CHF 4.4bln charge related to hedge fund liquidation. In terms of commentary, analysts at RBC note a slightly less optimistic mood across the markets, with its survey identifying six key issues: 1) expectations surrounding the total return to normality being pushed back. 2) The spread of COVID variants across the US. 3) A split among investors surrounding inflation - with a negative tilt - "in total, 42% say the ramp in inflation will be negative or very negative for stocks, and 30% say it will be positive or very positive". 4) Fewer investors backing the bearish USD narrative. 5) Fed tapering expectations nudging forward. 6) Downside risks from President Biden's policies - "Tax generally is a major focus, with 93% saying it’s likely or very likely Biden will get something significant done on corporate taxes, along with 75% who expect significant action on individual taxes and 59% who expect significant action on capital gains taxes", the analysts say.

Top European News

  • Nordea Markets’ Head of Global Trading in Sweden Leaves Bank
  • Merkel Party Leader Reinforces Call for Tighter German Lockdown
  • Citi Sees Tighter Oil Market on Phased Return of Supply by OPEC+

In FX, the Dollar is on a firmer footing vs most G10 and EM counterparts having lost momentum over the Easter break against the backdrop of buoyant risk sentiment in wake of a stellar US jobs report and non-manufacturing ISM that hit an all time high. However, the bounce is partly due to weakness in several peers on technical grounds and repositioning as many centres return from extended holiday weekends, while the DXY may also have benefited from the fact that 92.500 held and contained declines within a 92.527-790 range ahead of Redbook weekly updates and JOLTS.

  • NZD/AUD/GBP - Cross headwinds rather than bearish independent factors appear to be undermining the Kiwi and Pound as Nzd/Usd fades from circa 0.7069 to sub-0.7020 and Aud/Nzd hovers near the top of a 1.0858-30 range following no change in policy guidance whatsoever from the RBA, but Aud/Usd underpinned by another healthy rise in Aussie job ads and an above forecast Chinese Caixin services PMI that is also supporting the YUAN. Indeed, Aud/Usd is maintaining 0.7600+ status and Usd/Cnh is back on the 6.5500 handle vs a high of 6.5650, albeit not quite as low as the overnight Usd/Cny midpoint fix 6.5527 or sub-6.5500 base for the onshore unit. Back to Sterling, Cable has recoiled from circa 2 week highs above 1.3900 to test bids and underlying support around 1.3825, while Eur/Gbp is probing twin peaks either side of month end at 0.8534 and 0.8537 to touch 0.8545 having failed to sustain downside thrust through 0.8475 only yesterday.
  • EUR - Bucking the overall trend, as the Euro attempts to keep afloat of 1.1800 vs the Greenback with assistance from the aforementioned Eur/Gbp cross rebound, corrective convergence in EGB/UST yield differentials and perhaps even a much better than expected EZ Sentix index. However, news that between 51.7-61% of the population in Germany, France and Italy may have been vaccinated by the end of H1 may also be helping the single currency resist Buck advances.
  • CHF/CAD/JPY - All softer vs their US rival, with the Franc pivoting 0.9375 and aware if not actually acknowledging the fact that sight deposits fell at Swiss domestic banks in the latest week, while the Loonie is not getting much impetus from firm oil prices inside a 1.2554-16 band and the Yen is trying to keep its head beyond 110.50 following somewhat mixed and disappointing Japanese household spending data.

In commodities, WTI and Brent front-month futures see somewhat of a relief rally following substantial losses yesterday whereby Brent prices settled over 4% lower on the day - with WTI now back around USD 60/bbl (vs low 58.62/bbl) and Brent probing USD 63.50/bbl (vs low USD 62.08/bbl). Newsflow for the complex remains light as participants continue to balance the supply and demand implications with COVID remaining the epicentre as OECD nations observe more stringent COVID cubing measures, whilst OPEC opted to again go against market expectations and decided to gradually increase output as it forecasts higher summer demand - which will pose its own risks if the COVID situation deteriorates further or if the inoculation drive is materially disrupted. Nonetheless, as COVID developments are watched, a more imminent risk event is the JCPOA meeting between the US, Iran, China, Russia, and the EU, whereby the 2015 nuclear deal will be revisited. On this front, the US has reportedly put on the table several proposals - but Tehran remains conservative and has stuck to the script - suggesting economic sanctions need to be lifted before meaningful dialogue. Neither the US nor Iran expects breakthroughs at the meeting, thus eyes remain on the overall tone and for any joint statement which could be perceived as constructive. In terms of commentary, Goldman Sachs notes that with OPEC out of the way, supply concerns shift to the JCPOA agreement - “After the increase in Iran exports so far this year, our base case remains that a full recovery won’t occur until summer 2022, implying an agreement likely early-2022... Even if an agreement occurs earlier, we believe that it wouldn’t derail our constructive oil view relative to market forwards through 2022... We don’t see the potential recovery in Iran exports as an exogenous shock to the oil market", the bank says. Analysts at ING meanwhile warn of the possibility of a significant amount of oil supply returning to the market in the coming months, referring to a concoction of Iranian and OPEC+ supply - "we believe that, even with additional supply from OPEC+ along with higher Iranian output, the market will still be drawing down inventories through the year, so impacting the prospects for higher prices later in the year.", the Dutch bank says. In terms of metals, spot gold and silver trade within tight ranges as the precious metals mirror Dollar action, with the yellow metal residing around USD 1,730/oz (1727-38 intraday range), whilst spot silver trades on either side of USD 25/oz (24.76-25.19 intraday range). Turning to base metals, copper prices are bolstered by the ongoing reflationary hopes, the US infrastructure package, and as top-producer Chile shut its borders amid a resurgence of the virus. Chinese steel prices meanwhile leaped to record highs as traders cite robust demand as low supply as its top steel-making city Tangshan saw pollution curbs.

US Event Calendar

  • 10am: Feb. JOLTs Job Openings, est. 6,900, prior 6,917

DB's Henry Allen concludes the overnight wrap

For readers coming back to their desks this morning after the long Easter weekend, markets have been nothing short of buoyant while you’ve been away, with a very strong US jobs report on Friday along with a bumper ISM services number yesterday helping to bolster the bullish case for risk assets. For now, this momentum from the data has outweighed investor concerns about the rising Covid case count at the global level, which has led much of Europe and other regions into tighter restrictions. But unlike the big global rise we saw at the tail-end of last year, the ongoing vaccine rollout has helped to blunt that increase, and some of the most Covid-sensitive assets like airline stocks have proven resilient in the face of the latest wave.

In terms of the latest moves, the S&P 500 had advanced another +1.44% by the US close last night, solidly planting a flag above the 4,000 mark it breached last Thursday, as the Dow Jones (+1.13%) also hit a fresh record. It was a broad-based advance for the S&P as over 80% of the constituents in the index rose yesterday and 23 of 24 industry groups rose on the day. Energy stocks (-2.41%) were the sole big exception against the backdrop of lower oil prices, as both Brent Crude (-4.18%) and WTI (-4.56%) lost significant ground. Tech stocks continued their recent resilience however, with the NASDAQ up +1.67%, supported by the fact that the positive sentiment of late hasn’t seen a move higher in yields alongside that. Indeed yields on 10yr Treasuries closed -2.1bps lower yesterday at 1.700%, more than 7bps beneath their intraday high last week, and are down a further -1.1bps this morning.

As mentioned above, it was the US jobs report on Friday that propelled that latest shift upwards, with growth in nonfarm payrolls coming in at +916k, well ahead of the consensus expectation of +660k. It was the biggest rise in seven months and comes as restrictions continue to be lifted across most of the US, and payrolls increased in multiple industries, with leisure and hospitality (+280k) seeing the biggest gains thanks to the easing of restrictions, while public and private education also saw noticeable gains as school activities resumed across the country. And in further positive news, both of the previous two months saw upward revisions to payrolls, with the February number revised up +89k to +468k, and the January number revised up +67k to +233k. More broadly, the labour force participation rate rose a tenth to 61.5%, even as the unemployment rate fell to a post-pandemic low of 6.0%. And the broader U-6 measure that also includes those marginally attached to the workforce and those working part-time for economic reasons, fell to 10.7% in March. This measure is one that’s been cited by Fed Chair Powell as a more inclusive measure of underutilisation in the labour market.

On top of the very strong jobs report on Friday, the ISM services index yesterday rose 8.4pts to 63.7pts – which is the highest reading since the data series started in 1997 and well ahead of the expected 59.0, with the final number exceeding every estimate on Bloomberg. The underlying employment data tied into what the jobs data from last week showed as the ISM employment index rose to 57.2 from 52.7, as most jobs affected by the pandemic started to return. The largest increases were in new orders and business activity, two areas seen as leading indicators. New orders jumped 15.3 points to an all-time high of 67.2 in March, and the business activity index posted a record high of 69.4, after rising 13.9 points.

Overnight in Asia markets have been somewhat less positive than the US, with the Nikkei (-1.14%) and Shanghai Comp (-0.32%) moving lower and the Kospi (-0.01%) almost unchanged, though the Asx (+0.95%) has made gains. One factor weighing which seems to be weighing on markets in the region is the report from multiple outlets including the FT and Bloomberg that the People’s Bank of China is seeking to curtail credit growth, following strong growth in the first two months of the year. Meanwhile in Australia, the RBA left their policy settings on hold as expected, with the cash rate and the 3-year yield target remaining at 0.1%. Elsewhere, US equity futures are also pointing lower this morning, with those on the S&P 500 down -0.22%, though European futures are pointing to a positive open as they reopen after the extended weekend.

Turning to the week ahead now, and it’s likely that the Covid pandemic will continue to dominate given the jitters in multiple countries over the rising case counts. Europe has already been shifting towards tougher restrictions, with the French lockdown beginning on Saturday, while a rapid rise in India has seen the daily case count move above 100,000 for the first time yesterday, and the state of Maharashtra move to working from home and the closure of non-essential shops. The main exception to this pattern has been the UK however, which has one of the most advanced vaccination programmes in the world, where Prime Minister Johnson confirmed that the restrictions in England would be eased further on Monday, with the reopening of non-essential retail, outdoor hospitality venues, and indoor leisure and sports facilities.

Elsewhere, the main scheduled event will be the IMF/World Bank Spring Meetings, which kicked off virtually yesterday. That’ll feature a number of panels with major global policymakers, including Fed Chair Powell, who’ll be taking part in a panel on the global economy on Thursday, as well as US Treasury Secretary Yellen, and the special presidential envoy for climate, John Kerry. In addition, today will see the release of the IMF’s latest World Economic Outlook, which contains their global growth forecasts over the coming years.

As global policymakers come together for this event, yesterday saw US Treasury Secretary Yellen use a speech to call for a global minimum corporate tax, saying that “it is important to work with other countries to end the pressures of tax competition and corporate tax base erosion.” President Biden’s infrastructure plan last week featured an increase in the US minimum tax rate as part of the proposals to pay for it, and Yellen said that the US was “working with G20 nations to agree to a global minimum corporate tax rate that can stop a race to the bottom.” There have been talks at the OECD-level for some time on this issue, but they’re yet to reach a deal.

From central banks, the main events this week will be the release of the March minutes from both the Federal Reserve and the ECB, which are coming out on Wednesday and Thursday respectively. For the FOMC minutes, our US economists write that they’re most interested in the discussion around the Fed’s reaction function in the coming years and insights into the forecast by a majority of officials, since the median dot in the dot plot still had rates unchanged by end-2023. Indeed it’s worth noting that since the meeting in mid-March, markets have moved to price in an even faster pace of rate hikes given the very strong data that’s come out, and current pricing is indicating a rate hike by end-2022, more than a year before the Fed’s median dot indicated. Our economists say that they’ll also be focusing on the inflation outlook, and the latest views on what constitutes “substantial further progress” to initiate tapering. Over at the ECB meanwhile, the March meeting saw the Governing Council announce they’d significantly increase the pace of PEPP purchases until the end of Q2, and at the subsequent press conference, President Lagarde implied that the pace of purchases would be reviewed quarterly when new staff projections are available. Since then however, there’s been a clarification that they could do this between staff projections should the conditions warrant it, so our European economists will be looking closely to see if the minutes shed any further light on the discussion on this issue.

Given a majority of markets were closed over the holiday weekend, let’s quickly recap last week’s moves as we normally do at the start of the week. US equities rose to record highs that were then eclipsed yesterday, with the S&P 500 moving above 4000 for the first time on record having gained +1.14% during the holiday-shortened 4-day week. Technology stocks outperformed with the NASDAQ rising +2.60% on the week, while the highly concentrated megacap NYFANG index gained +4.47%. It was just the second weekly gain for the NASDAQ in the last seven weeks. European stocks rose as well even as high case counts continue to necessitate further lockdowns. The STOXX 600 gained +1.24% over the four trading days, with the German DAX (+2.43%) and French CAC (+1.91%) outperforming other bourses slightly.

US 10yr Treasury yields finished the week +4.6bps higher at 1.72%, nearly erasing the prior week’s drop in yields, which was the first weekly decline since late-January. Much of this move followed the release of President Biden’s infrastructure plan, called the “American Jobs Plan” that would see $2.25 trillion invested over the next eight years. Europe saw a similar rise in yields with 10yr bund yields falling +1.8bps to -0.33%, while gilts rose +3.8bps to 0.80%. Elsewhere in fixed income, credit markets tightened in Europe and the US as risk sentiment improved. US high-yield cash spreads tightened -14bps, while IG spreads came in -7bps. European credit performed slightly less well, with HY spreads tightening -7bps and IG spreads just -2bps tighter.

Lastly the other big piece of data out from late last week were the global manufacturing PMI data, which were some of the highest ever recorded. In the US, the ISM manufacturing PMI increased from 60.8 to 64.8, the highest level since 1983 as stronger growth in new orders and output highlight the increasing demand. While in Europe the manufacturing PMI reading for the Euro area rose to 62.5 in March from 57.9 in the month prior. Germany’s manufacturing PMI came in at 66.6 and was the highest since the series began and the ninth consecutive expansion. The UK’s PMI reading was its highest since 2011 at 58.9, compared to 55.1 in February.

Tyler Durden Tue, 04/06/2021 - 07:48

Read More

Continue Reading

International

Four Years Ago This Week, Freedom Was Torched

Four Years Ago This Week, Freedom Was Torched

Authored by Jeffrey Tucker via The Brownstone Institute,

"Beware the Ides of March,” Shakespeare…

Published

on

Four Years Ago This Week, Freedom Was Torched

Authored by Jeffrey Tucker via The Brownstone Institute,

"Beware the Ides of March,” Shakespeare quotes the soothsayer’s warning Julius Caesar about what turned out to be an impending assassination on March 15. The death of American liberty happened around the same time four years ago, when the orders went out from all levels of government to close all indoor and outdoor venues where people gather. 

It was not quite a law and it was never voted on by anyone. Seemingly out of nowhere, people who the public had largely ignored, the public health bureaucrats, all united to tell the executives in charge – mayors, governors, and the president – that the only way to deal with a respiratory virus was to scrap freedom and the Bill of Rights. 

And they did, not only in the US but all over the world. 

The forced closures in the US began on March 6 when the mayor of Austin, Texas, announced the shutdown of the technology and arts festival South by Southwest. Hundreds of thousands of contracts, of attendees and vendors, were instantly scrapped. The mayor said he was acting on the advice of his health experts and they in turn pointed to the CDC, which in turn pointed to the World Health Organization, which in turn pointed to member states and so on. 

There was no record of Covid in Austin, Texas, that day but they were sure they were doing their part to stop the spread. It was the first deployment of the “Zero Covid” strategy that became, for a time, official US policy, just as in China. 

It was never clear precisely who to blame or who would take responsibility, legal or otherwise. 

This Friday evening press conference in Austin was just the beginning. By the next Thursday evening, the lockdown mania reached a full crescendo. Donald Trump went on nationwide television to announce that everything was under control but that he was stopping all travel in and out of US borders, from Europe, the UK, Australia, and New Zealand. American citizens would need to return by Monday or be stuck. 

Americans abroad panicked while spending on tickets home and crowded into international airports with waits up to 8 hours standing shoulder to shoulder. It was the first clear sign: there would be no consistency in the deployment of these edicts. 

There is no historical record of any American president ever issuing global travel restrictions like this without a declaration of war. Until then, and since the age of travel began, every American had taken it for granted that he could buy a ticket and board a plane. That was no longer possible. Very quickly it became even difficult to travel state to state, as most states eventually implemented a two-week quarantine rule. 

The next day, Friday March 13, Broadway closed and New York City began to empty out as any residents who could went to summer homes or out of state. 

On that day, the Trump administration declared the national emergency by invoking the Stafford Act which triggers new powers and resources to the Federal Emergency Management Administration. 

In addition, the Department of Health and Human Services issued a classified document, only to be released to the public months later. The document initiated the lockdowns. It still does not exist on any government website.

The White House Coronavirus Response Task Force, led by the Vice President, will coordinate a whole-of-government approach, including governors, state and local officials, and members of Congress, to develop the best options for the safety, well-being, and health of the American people. HHS is the LFA [Lead Federal Agency] for coordinating the federal response to COVID-19.

Closures were guaranteed:

Recommend significantly limiting public gatherings and cancellation of almost all sporting events, performances, and public and private meetings that cannot be convened by phone. Consider school closures. Issue widespread ‘stay at home’ directives for public and private organizations, with nearly 100% telework for some, although critical public services and infrastructure may need to retain skeleton crews. Law enforcement could shift to focus more on crime prevention, as routine monitoring of storefronts could be important.

In this vision of turnkey totalitarian control of society, the vaccine was pre-approved: “Partner with pharmaceutical industry to produce anti-virals and vaccine.”

The National Security Council was put in charge of policy making. The CDC was just the marketing operation. That’s why it felt like martial law. Without using those words, that’s what was being declared. It even urged information management, with censorship strongly implied.

The timing here is fascinating. This document came out on a Friday. But according to every autobiographical account – from Mike Pence and Scott Gottlieb to Deborah Birx and Jared Kushner – the gathered team did not meet with Trump himself until the weekend of the 14th and 15th, Saturday and Sunday. 

According to their account, this was his first real encounter with the urge that he lock down the whole country. He reluctantly agreed to 15 days to flatten the curve. He announced this on Monday the 16th with the famous line: “All public and private venues where people gather should be closed.”

This makes no sense. The decision had already been made and all enabling documents were already in circulation. 

There are only two possibilities. 

One: the Department of Homeland Security issued this March 13 HHS document without Trump’s knowledge or authority. That seems unlikely. 

Two: Kushner, Birx, Pence, and Gottlieb are lying. They decided on a story and they are sticking to it. 

Trump himself has never explained the timeline or precisely when he decided to greenlight the lockdowns. To this day, he avoids the issue beyond his constant claim that he doesn’t get enough credit for his handling of the pandemic.

With Nixon, the famous question was always what did he know and when did he know it? When it comes to Trump and insofar as concerns Covid lockdowns – unlike the fake allegations of collusion with Russia – we have no investigations. To this day, no one in the corporate media seems even slightly interested in why, how, or when human rights got abolished by bureaucratic edict. 

As part of the lockdowns, the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency, which was and is part of the Department of Homeland Security, as set up in 2018, broke the entire American labor force into essential and nonessential.

They also set up and enforced censorship protocols, which is why it seemed like so few objected. In addition, CISA was tasked with overseeing mail-in ballots. 

Only 8 days into the 15, Trump announced that he wanted to open the country by Easter, which was on April 12. His announcement on March 24 was treated as outrageous and irresponsible by the national press but keep in mind: Easter would already take us beyond the initial two-week lockdown. What seemed to be an opening was an extension of closing. 

This announcement by Trump encouraged Birx and Fauci to ask for an additional 30 days of lockdown, which Trump granted. Even on April 23, Trump told Georgia and Florida, which had made noises about reopening, that “It’s too soon.” He publicly fought with the governor of Georgia, who was first to open his state. 

Before the 15 days was over, Congress passed and the president signed the 880-page CARES Act, which authorized the distribution of $2 trillion to states, businesses, and individuals, thus guaranteeing that lockdowns would continue for the duration. 

There was never a stated exit plan beyond Birx’s public statements that she wanted zero cases of Covid in the country. That was never going to happen. It is very likely that the virus had already been circulating in the US and Canada from October 2019. A famous seroprevalence study by Jay Bhattacharya came out in May 2020 discerning that infections and immunity were already widespread in the California county they examined. 

What that implied was two crucial points: there was zero hope for the Zero Covid mission and this pandemic would end as they all did, through endemicity via exposure, not from a vaccine as such. That was certainly not the message that was being broadcast from Washington. The growing sense at the time was that we all had to sit tight and just wait for the inoculation on which pharmaceutical companies were working. 

By summer 2020, you recall what happened. A restless generation of kids fed up with this stay-at-home nonsense seized on the opportunity to protest racial injustice in the killing of George Floyd. Public health officials approved of these gatherings – unlike protests against lockdowns – on grounds that racism was a virus even more serious than Covid. Some of these protests got out of hand and became violent and destructive. 

Meanwhile, substance abuse rage – the liquor and weed stores never closed – and immune systems were being degraded by lack of normal exposure, exactly as the Bakersfield doctors had predicted. Millions of small businesses had closed. The learning losses from school closures were mounting, as it turned out that Zoom school was near worthless. 

It was about this time that Trump seemed to figure out – thanks to the wise council of Dr. Scott Atlas – that he had been played and started urging states to reopen. But it was strange: he seemed to be less in the position of being a president in charge and more of a public pundit, Tweeting out his wishes until his account was banned. He was unable to put the worms back in the can that he had approved opening. 

By that time, and by all accounts, Trump was convinced that the whole effort was a mistake, that he had been trolled into wrecking the country he promised to make great. It was too late. Mail-in ballots had been widely approved, the country was in shambles, the media and public health bureaucrats were ruling the airwaves, and his final months of the campaign failed even to come to grips with the reality on the ground. 

At the time, many people had predicted that once Biden took office and the vaccine was released, Covid would be declared to have been beaten. But that didn’t happen and mainly for one reason: resistance to the vaccine was more intense than anyone had predicted. The Biden administration attempted to impose mandates on the entire US workforce. Thanks to a Supreme Court ruling, that effort was thwarted but not before HR departments around the country had already implemented them. 

As the months rolled on – and four major cities closed all public accommodations to the unvaccinated, who were being demonized for prolonging the pandemic – it became clear that the vaccine could not and would not stop infection or transmission, which means that this shot could not be classified as a public health benefit. Even as a private benefit, the evidence was mixed. Any protection it provided was short-lived and reports of vaccine injury began to mount. Even now, we cannot gain full clarity on the scale of the problem because essential data and documentation remains classified. 

After four years, we find ourselves in a strange position. We still do not know precisely what unfolded in mid-March 2020: who made what decisions, when, and why. There has been no serious attempt at any high level to provide a clear accounting much less assign blame. 

Not even Tucker Carlson, who reportedly played a crucial role in getting Trump to panic over the virus, will tell us the source of his own information or what his source told him. There have been a series of valuable hearings in the House and Senate but they have received little to no press attention, and none have focus on the lockdown orders themselves. 

The prevailing attitude in public life is just to forget the whole thing. And yet we live now in a country very different from the one we inhabited five years ago. Our media is captured. Social media is widely censored in violation of the First Amendment, a problem being taken up by the Supreme Court this month with no certainty of the outcome. The administrative state that seized control has not given up power. Crime has been normalized. Art and music institutions are on the rocks. Public trust in all official institutions is at rock bottom. We don’t even know if we can trust the elections anymore. 

In the early days of lockdown, Henry Kissinger warned that if the mitigation plan does not go well, the world will find itself set “on fire.” He died in 2023. Meanwhile, the world is indeed on fire. The essential struggle in every country on earth today concerns the battle between the authority and power of permanent administration apparatus of the state – the very one that took total control in lockdowns – and the enlightenment ideal of a government that is responsible to the will of the people and the moral demand for freedom and rights. 

How this struggle turns out is the essential story of our times. 

CODA: I’m embedding a copy of PanCAP Adapted, as annotated by Debbie Lerman. You might need to download the whole thing to see the annotations. If you can help with research, please do.

*  *  *

Jeffrey Tucker is the author of the excellent new book 'Life After Lock-Down'

Tyler Durden Mon, 03/11/2024 - 23:40

Read More

Continue Reading

Government

Fauci Deputy Warned Him Against Vaccine Mandates: Email

Fauci Deputy Warned Him Against Vaccine Mandates: Email

Authored by Zachary Stieber via The Epoch Times (emphasis ours),

Mandating COVID-19…

Published

on

Fauci Deputy Warned Him Against Vaccine Mandates: Email

Authored by Zachary Stieber via The Epoch Times (emphasis ours),

Mandating COVID-19 vaccination was a mistake due to ethical and other concerns, a top government doctor warned Dr. Anthony Fauci after Dr. Fauci promoted mass vaccination.

Coercing or forcing people to take a vaccine can have negative consequences from a biological, sociological, psychological, economical, and ethical standpoint and is not worth the cost even if the vaccine is 100% safe,” Dr. Matthew Memoli, director of the Laboratory of Infectious Diseases clinical studies unit at the U.S. National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), told Dr. Fauci in an email.

“A more prudent approach that considers these issues would be to focus our efforts on those at high risk of severe disease and death, such as the elderly and obese, and do not push vaccination on the young and healthy any further.”

Dr. Anthony Fauci, ex-director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID. in Washington on Jan. 8, 2024. (Madalina Vasiliu/The Epoch Times)

Employing that strategy would help prevent loss of public trust and political capital, Dr. Memoli said.

The email was sent on July 30, 2021, after Dr. Fauci, director of the NIAID, claimed that communities would be safer if more people received one of the COVID-19 vaccines and that mass vaccination would lead to the end of the COVID-19 pandemic.

“We’re on a really good track now to really crush this outbreak, and the more people we get vaccinated, the more assuredness that we’re going to have that we’re going to be able to do that,” Dr. Fauci said on CNN the month prior.

Dr. Memoli, who has studied influenza vaccination for years, disagreed, telling Dr. Fauci that research in the field has indicated yearly shots sometimes drive the evolution of influenza.

Vaccinating people who have not been infected with COVID-19, he said, could potentially impact the evolution of the virus that causes COVID-19 in unexpected ways.

“At best what we are doing with mandated mass vaccination does nothing and the variants emerge evading immunity anyway as they would have without the vaccine,” Dr. Memoli wrote. “At worst it drives evolution of the virus in a way that is different from nature and possibly detrimental, prolonging the pandemic or causing more morbidity and mortality than it should.”

The vaccination strategy was flawed because it relied on a single antigen, introducing immunity that only lasted for a certain period of time, Dr. Memoli said. When the immunity weakened, the virus was given an opportunity to evolve.

Some other experts, including virologist Geert Vanden Bossche, have offered similar views. Others in the scientific community, such as U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention scientists, say vaccination prevents virus evolution, though the agency has acknowledged it doesn’t have records supporting its position.

Other Messages

Dr. Memoli sent the email to Dr. Fauci and two other top NIAID officials, Drs. Hugh Auchincloss and Clifford Lane. The message was first reported by the Wall Street Journal, though the publication did not publish the message. The Epoch Times obtained the email and 199 other pages of Dr. Memoli’s emails through a Freedom of Information Act request. There were no indications that Dr. Fauci ever responded to Dr. Memoli.

Later in 2021, the NIAID’s parent agency, the U.S. National Institutes of Health (NIH), and all other federal government agencies began requiring COVID-19 vaccination, under direction from President Joe Biden.

In other messages, Dr. Memoli said the mandates were unethical and that he was hopeful legal cases brought against the mandates would ultimately let people “make their own healthcare decisions.”

“I am certainly doing everything in my power to influence that,” he wrote on Nov. 2, 2021, to an unknown recipient. Dr. Memoli also disclosed that both he and his wife had applied for exemptions from the mandates imposed by the NIH and his wife’s employer. While her request had been granted, his had not as of yet, Dr. Memoli said. It’s not clear if it ever was.

According to Dr. Memoli, officials had not gone over the bioethics of the mandates. He wrote to the NIH’s Department of Bioethics, pointing out that the protection from the vaccines waned over time, that the shots can cause serious health issues such as myocarditis, or heart inflammation, and that vaccinated people were just as likely to spread COVID-19 as unvaccinated people.

He cited multiple studies in his emails, including one that found a resurgence of COVID-19 cases in a California health care system despite a high rate of vaccination and another that showed transmission rates were similar among the vaccinated and unvaccinated.

Dr. Memoli said he was “particularly interested in the bioethics of a mandate when the vaccine doesn’t have the ability to stop spread of the disease, which is the purpose of the mandate.”

The message led to Dr. Memoli speaking during an NIH event in December 2021, several weeks after he went public with his concerns about mandating vaccines.

“Vaccine mandates should be rare and considered only with a strong justification,” Dr. Memoli said in the debate. He suggested that the justification was not there for COVID-19 vaccines, given their fleeting effectiveness.

Julie Ledgerwood, another NIAID official who also spoke at the event, said that the vaccines were highly effective and that the side effects that had been detected were not significant. She did acknowledge that vaccinated people needed boosters after a period of time.

The NIH, and many other government agencies, removed their mandates in 2023 with the end of the COVID-19 public health emergency.

A request for comment from Dr. Fauci was not returned. Dr. Memoli told The Epoch Times in an email he was “happy to answer any questions you have” but that he needed clearance from the NIAID’s media office. That office then refused to give clearance.

Dr. Jay Bhattacharya, a professor of health policy at Stanford University, said that Dr. Memoli showed bravery when he warned Dr. Fauci against mandates.

“Those mandates have done more to demolish public trust in public health than any single action by public health officials in my professional career, including diminishing public trust in all vaccines.” Dr. Bhattacharya, a frequent critic of the U.S. response to COVID-19, told The Epoch Times via email. “It was risky for Dr. Memoli to speak publicly since he works at the NIH, and the culture of the NIH punishes those who cross powerful scientific bureaucrats like Dr. Fauci or his former boss, Dr. Francis Collins.”

Tyler Durden Mon, 03/11/2024 - 17:40

Read More

Continue Reading

Government

Trump “Clearly Hasn’t Learned From His COVID-Era Mistakes”, RFK Jr. Says

Trump "Clearly Hasn’t Learned From His COVID-Era Mistakes", RFK Jr. Says

Authored by Jeff Louderback via The Epoch Times (emphasis ours),

President…

Published

on

Trump "Clearly Hasn't Learned From His COVID-Era Mistakes", RFK Jr. Says

Authored by Jeff Louderback via The Epoch Times (emphasis ours),

President Joe Biden claimed that COVID vaccines are now helping cancer patients during his State of the Union address on March 7, but it was a response on Truth Social from former President Donald Trump that drew the ire of independent presidential candidate Robert F. Kennedy Jr.

Robert F. Kennedy Jr. holds a voter rally in Grand Rapids, Mich., on Feb. 10, 2024. (Mitch Ranger for The Epoch Times)

During the address, President Biden said: “The pandemic no longer controls our lives. The vaccines that saved us from COVID are now being used to help beat cancer, turning setback into comeback. That’s what America does.”

President Trump wrote: “The Pandemic no longer controls our lives. The VACCINES that saved us from COVID are now being used to help beat cancer—turning setback into comeback. YOU’RE WELCOME JOE. NINE-MONTH APPROVAL TIME VS. 12 YEARS THAT IT WOULD HAVE TAKEN YOU.”

An outspoken critic of President Trump’s COVID response, and the Operation Warp Speed program that escalated the availability of COVID vaccines, Mr. Kennedy said on X, formerly known as Twitter, that “Donald Trump clearly hasn’t learned from his COVID-era mistakes.”

“He fails to recognize how ineffective his warp speed vaccine is as the ninth shot is being recommended to seniors. Even more troubling is the documented harm being caused by the shot to so many innocent children and adults who are suffering myocarditis, pericarditis, and brain inflammation,” Mr. Kennedy remarked.

“This has been confirmed by a CDC-funded study of 99 million people. Instead of bragging about its speedy approval, we should be honestly and transparently debating the abundant evidence that this vaccine may have caused more harm than good.

“I look forward to debating both Trump and Biden on Sept. 16 in San Marcos, Texas.”

Mr. Kennedy announced in April 2023 that he would challenge President Biden for the 2024 Democratic Party presidential nomination before declaring his run as an independent last October, claiming that the Democrat National Committee was “rigging the primary.”

Since the early stages of his campaign, Mr. Kennedy has generated more support than pundits expected from conservatives, moderates, and independents resulting in speculation that he could take votes away from President Trump.

Many Republicans continue to seek a reckoning over the government-imposed pandemic lockdowns and vaccine mandates.

President Trump’s defense of Operation Warp Speed, the program he rolled out in May 2020 to spur the development and distribution of COVID-19 vaccines amid the pandemic, remains a sticking point for some of his supporters.

Vice President Mike Pence (L) and President Donald Trump deliver an update on Operation Warp Speed in the Rose Garden of the White House in Washington on Nov. 13, 2020. (Mandel Ngan/AFP via Getty Images)

Operation Warp Speed featured a partnership between the government, the military, and the private sector, with the government paying for millions of vaccine doses to be produced.

President Trump released a statement in March 2021 saying: “I hope everyone remembers when they’re getting the COVID-19 Vaccine, that if I wasn’t President, you wouldn’t be getting that beautiful ‘shot’ for 5 years, at best, and probably wouldn’t be getting it at all. I hope everyone remembers!”

President Trump said about the COVID-19 vaccine in an interview on Fox News in March 2021: “It works incredibly well. Ninety-five percent, maybe even more than that. I would recommend it, and I would recommend it to a lot of people that don’t want to get it and a lot of those people voted for me, frankly.

“But again, we have our freedoms and we have to live by that and I agree with that also. But it’s a great vaccine, it’s a safe vaccine, and it’s something that works.”

On many occasions, President Trump has said that he is not in favor of vaccine mandates.

An environmental attorney, Mr. Kennedy founded Children’s Health Defense, a nonprofit that aims to end childhood health epidemics by promoting vaccine safeguards, among other initiatives.

Last year, Mr. Kennedy told podcaster Joe Rogan that ivermectin was suppressed by the FDA so that the COVID-19 vaccines could be granted emergency use authorization.

He has criticized Big Pharma, vaccine safety, and government mandates for years.

Since launching his presidential campaign, Mr. Kennedy has made his stances on the COVID-19 vaccines, and vaccines in general, a frequent talking point.

“I would argue that the science is very clear right now that they [vaccines] caused a lot more problems than they averted,” Mr. Kennedy said on Piers Morgan Uncensored last April.

“And if you look at the countries that did not vaccinate, they had the lowest death rates, they had the lowest COVID and infection rates.”

Additional data show a “direct correlation” between excess deaths and high vaccination rates in developed countries, he said.

President Trump and Mr. Kennedy have similar views on topics like protecting the U.S.-Mexico border and ending the Russia-Ukraine war.

COVID-19 is the topic where Mr. Kennedy and President Trump seem to differ the most.

Former President Donald Trump intended to “drain the swamp” when he took office in 2017, but he was “intimidated by bureaucrats” at federal agencies and did not accomplish that objective, Mr. Kennedy said on Feb. 5.

Speaking at a voter rally in Tucson, where he collected signatures to get on the Arizona ballot, the independent presidential candidate said President Trump was “earnest” when he vowed to “drain the swamp,” but it was “business as usual” during his term.

John Bolton, who President Trump appointed as a national security adviser, is “the template for a swamp creature,” Mr. Kennedy said.

Scott Gottlieb, who President Trump named to run the FDA, “was Pfizer’s business partner” and eventually returned to Pfizer, Mr. Kennedy said.

Mr. Kennedy said that President Trump had more lobbyists running federal agencies than any president in U.S. history.

“You can’t reform them when you’ve got the swamp creatures running them, and I’m not going to do that. I’m going to do something different,” Mr. Kennedy said.

During the COVID-19 pandemic, President Trump “did not ask the questions that he should have,” he believes.

President Trump “knew that lockdowns were wrong” and then “agreed to lockdowns,” Mr. Kennedy said.

He also “knew that hydroxychloroquine worked, he said it,” Mr. Kennedy explained, adding that he was eventually “rolled over” by Dr. Anthony Fauci and his advisers.

President Donald Trump greets the crowd before he leaves at the Operation Warp Speed Vaccine Summit in Washington on Dec. 8, 2020. (Tasos Katopodis/Getty Images)

MaryJo Perry, a longtime advocate for vaccine choice and a Trump supporter, thinks votes will be at a premium come Election Day, particularly because the independent and third-party field is becoming more competitive.

Ms. Perry, president of Mississippi Parents for Vaccine Rights, believes advocates for medical freedom could determine who is ultimately president.

She believes that Mr. Kennedy is “pulling votes from Trump” because of the former president’s stance on the vaccines.

“People care about medical freedom. It’s an important issue here in Mississippi, and across the country,” Ms. Perry told The Epoch Times.

“Trump should admit he was wrong about Operation Warp Speed and that COVID vaccines have been dangerous. That would make a difference among people he has offended.”

President Trump won’t lose enough votes to Mr. Kennedy about Operation Warp Speed and COVID vaccines to have a significant impact on the election, Ohio Republican strategist Wes Farno told The Epoch Times.

President Trump won in Ohio by eight percentage points in both 2016 and 2020. The Ohio Republican Party endorsed President Trump for the nomination in 2024.

“The positives of a Trump presidency far outweigh the negatives,” Mr. Farno said. “People are more concerned about their wallet and the economy.

“They are asking themselves if they were better off during President Trump’s term compared to since President Biden took office. The answer to that question is obvious because many Americans are struggling to afford groceries, gas, mortgages, and rent payments.

“America needs President Trump.”

Multiple national polls back Mr. Farno’s view.

As of March 6, the RealClearPolitics average of polls indicates that President Trump has 41.8 percent support in a five-way race that includes President Biden (38.4 percent), Mr. Kennedy (12.7 percent), independent Cornel West (2.6 percent), and Green Party nominee Jill Stein (1.7 percent).

A Pew Research Center study conducted among 10,133 U.S. adults from Feb. 7 to Feb. 11 showed that Democrats and Democrat-leaning independents (42 percent) are more likely than Republicans and GOP-leaning independents (15 percent) to say they have received an updated COVID vaccine.

The poll also reported that just 28 percent of adults say they have received the updated COVID inoculation.

The peer-reviewed multinational study of more than 99 million vaccinated people that Mr. Kennedy referenced in his X post on March 7 was published in the Vaccine journal on Feb. 12.

It aimed to evaluate the risk of 13 adverse events of special interest (AESI) following COVID-19 vaccination. The AESIs spanned three categories—neurological, hematologic (blood), and cardiovascular.

The study reviewed data collected from more than 99 million vaccinated people from eight nations—Argentina, Australia, Canada, Denmark, Finland, France, New Zealand, and Scotland—looking at risks up to 42 days after getting the shots.

Three vaccines—Pfizer and Moderna’s mRNA vaccines as well as AstraZeneca’s viral vector jab—were examined in the study.

Researchers found higher-than-expected cases that they deemed met the threshold to be potential safety signals for multiple AESIs, including for Guillain-Barre syndrome (GBS), cerebral venous sinus thrombosis (CVST), myocarditis, and pericarditis.

A safety signal refers to information that could suggest a potential risk or harm that may be associated with a medical product.

The study identified higher incidences of neurological, cardiovascular, and blood disorder complications than what the researchers expected.

President Trump’s role in Operation Warp Speed, and his continued praise of the COVID vaccine, remains a concern for some voters, including those who still support him.

Krista Cobb is a 40-year-old mother in western Ohio. She voted for President Trump in 2020 and said she would cast her vote for him this November, but she was stunned when she saw his response to President Biden about the COVID-19 vaccine during the State of the Union address.

I love President Trump and support his policies, but at this point, he has to know they [advisers and health officials] lied about the shot,” Ms. Cobb told The Epoch Times.

“If he continues to promote it, especially after all of the hearings they’ve had about it in Congress, the side effects, and cover-ups on Capitol Hill, at what point does he become the same as the people who have lied?” Ms. Cobb added.

“I think he should distance himself from talk about Operation Warp Speed and even admit that he was wrong—that the vaccines have not had the impact he was told they would have. If he did that, people would respect him even more.”

Tyler Durden Mon, 03/11/2024 - 17:00

Read More

Continue Reading

Trending