Connect with us

Government

The Survival of Millions of Small Businesses Is Threatened

The Survival of Millions of Small Businesses Is Threatened

Published

on

The Survival of Millions of Small Businesses Is Threatened: Let’s Support Them!

“I can’t throw everything I worked for under the bridge. I’m sitting in my retirement.”

Dennis Dreibelbis – owner of the G Bridge Lodge, in a restaurant he purchased in 1984 investing long term to support his retirement –  6/10/20

Mr. Dreibelbis is 69 years old. In mid–March he shut down his Pennsylvania restaurant. He quickly fell behind in payments to vendors, rent, utilities, and payroll. He hopes to see a return of customers when he reopens this summer.  He received a Payroll Protection Program loan which goes mostly to pay his staff. He still has insurance, maintenance, and other unpaid bills pilling up. Dreibelbis does not want to close the business and lose his investment or be forced to sell in a weak economy.

David Deeds, a professor of entrepreneurship at the University of St. Thomas says, “Their (retirees) time horizon is short.” He estimates that revenues for most small businesses revenues will fall up to 50% and will need to be ready for reduced income for up to three years.  Dreibelbis’s situation is typical of 40% of 31 million small business owners who are age 55 or older. Prospective retirees face a major crisis keeping their business operating and running up debts while looking to retire in the near future.

Four Major Factors

Millions of small businesses are struggling to survive due to lockdowns, delayed reopening, and now reversed openings. To understand the dynamic transformation small businesses are experiencing we’ll look at four factors:

  • Pandemic Impact – Review of three of some of the hardest hit industries: restaurants, lodging, and creative services.
  • The Outlook for Small Businesses – Examine the present “Great Depression” state of small businesses and prospect of a U-shaped cycle of contraction, with an extended trough and recovery.
  • Federal Relief Programs Fall Short– Evaluate how well federal financial assistance to small businesses is working and where it is fails to meet the needs of small businesses.
  • Investment Opportunities – Present several investment alternatives to take an active role in supporting small businesses.

Pandemic Impact

Restaurants

There are 1 million restaurants across the U.S. with 70% of them run by small businesses owners.  The restaurant industry has been hard hit by the pandemic with a loss of $82 billion of total restaurant sales from March through May:

Sources: U.S. Census, National Restaurant Association – 6/16/20

The National Restaurant Association estimates that 3%, or 30,000 of total restaurant locations have already closed permanently. As the financial squeeze of Mr. Dreibelbis typifies, many restaurants are hanging on by a financial thread with curbside pickup, delivery or outside dining at 50 % capacity.

Sources: Open Table, Bloomberg – 6/17/20

Restaurants have seen an increase in business since states have reopened yet sales are falling back. A recent analysis of Open Table reservations shows a slow rise as reopening activity began across the country but was followed by an 18% fall.  This decline maybe the result of a rise in COVID-19 cases in 21 states causing prospective diners to be concerned about their safety.

Open Table predicts that 25% or 250,000 of all restaurants will permanently close which includes 175,000 small business operated locations. Other research of major concern comes from Yelp. Yelp reports for the week of June 15th that 53% of website listed restaurants have posted ‘permanently closed’ notices with highest rates of closure in Los Angeles, New York and San Francisco.

Hotels

The American Hotel and Lodging Association (AHLA) estimates that 8 of 10 hotel rooms were empty in April.  AHLA forecasts a 50% or more decline in revenue for the year of 2020. Over 70% of all hotel employees have been laid off or about 1.6M employees and a loss of $2.4B per week. Oxford Economics estimates that at total of 3.9M jobs that support the hotel industry will be lost over the next two years.

Source: AHLA, Oxford Economics – 6/16/20

The AHLA expects a slow recovery process as travellers become more confident in staying at a hotels. There are 33,000 small businesses operating hotels in the U.S. with projected occupancy rate of 20% or lower.  At a 35% occupancy rate these small businesses are at risk of closing their locations permanently.  Thus, most of these small business run locations are in danger of closing. Airbnb competing with the mainstream hotel industry has experienced a devasting impact in their bookings as well. IPX 1031 reports that 64 % of guests cancelled their bookings. Airbnb expects a 44% loss in revenue from June thru August. About 70% of guests say they are fearful about the safety of staying at host location.  Bookings are beginning to pick up as reopening of the economy begins with 26% of guests say they will rebook for this summer.  However, hosts face a financial challenge as 16% have already delayed a mortgage payment and 50% expect to be out of business if the pandemic lasts for 6 months or longer.

Creative Services

The gig economy is huge segment of our workforce. In 2019, 33% of the labor force or 55M contract workers were in the labor force, according to McKinsey & Company. Since the pandemic hit the U.S., thousands of gig economy workers were laid off as they are often the first to be let go in any recession. Creative services is a major segment of the gig economy.  The highly skilled creative services workforce includes: writers, actors, producers, directors, studio crews, artists, video and audio professionals. Los Angeles has the second largest creative services workforce second to New York.  The Los Angeles economy has been hard hit by the mid-March shutdown with an unemployment rate of 21%.  The heart of the local economy is in entertainment production. Media production is a project based business using ad hoc teams. Thus, when production was shutdown contractors were laid off without major company benefits like health insurance, retirement matching funds or stock options. The creative services industry while concentrated in New York and Los Angeles employs thousands of workers across the U.S.

Source: The Wall Street Journal, 6/30/20

Other skilled independent service workers include technical workers like software developers and IT staff, and professional services which include attorneys, marketing support staff, and management consultants.  As the entertainment industry shutdown it depended on technical services workers to quickly shift production to Zoom shows and at home programs. This production shift provided a bridge during the shelter-in-place situation while providing program content for advertising.  California has announced a partial reopening of the economy. However, there are many issues in shifting to in studio production. New virus control regulations call for six foot social distancing, masks and disinfecting that are difficult to implement in an indoor studio team environment.   New Zealand with a good virus containment record is already taking advantage of the Los Angeles film industry predicament by offering incentives to move production activity to their studios. In Europe, the UK and Germany are also promoting their contained virus facilities for media development. In addition, Los Angeles is likely to have a slow recovery due to increasing virus infections in the Southern California area. Due to increasing infections creatives services workers enrolled in the Pandemic Unemployment Assistance program are likely to need continued benefit payments.

The Outlook for Small Businesses

This is a small business Great Depression

Nicholas Colas, Co-Founder, DataTrek Research

The small businesses sector is the jobs engine of the U.S. economy. In 2019 small businesses created 1.5M jobs for 64% of total business new hires. Plus, small businesses provided 50% of all economic output and 60M jobs accounting for 47% of the total labor force (chart below). Many businesses are just hanging on as only 40 % of small businesses under 500 employees are profitable.  The other 60% are either breaking even or losing money.  Most small businesses have only 30 days of free cash flow.

Sources: The U.S Census, Heather Long, Washington Post – 6/5/20

Prior to the pandemic, small businesses have been directly targeted by big businesses which caused business closures and a forced reduction in workers noted in the chart above.  For example, in the Dallas metro area Walmart has located ‘neighborhood’ grocery stores in locations next to locally owned food stores triggering the closing of many locally operated grocery stores. Amazon purchased Whole Foods, providing financial and marketing power to take market share from local organic food businesses that had established separate niche market positions from Safeway and Albertson’s.  As the pandemic has forced consumers to stay home, major players like Amazon and Walmart have cranked up their curbside pick-up and home food delivery services. Thus, further eroding market share of local groceries that have not been able to offer online delivery services.

In the retail sector, Amazon has built a huge e-commerce online business which has continued to whittle away at market share of small retail businesses.  Small businesses try to differentiate their business by offering sales, support and expertise not available on the internet.  For example, a California sewing machine and fabric retailer, experienced a 90% decline in fabric sales from the lockdown. Yet, just one day after the lockdown they had 45 people come in for sewing machine repairs. As people were sheltering-in-place there was renewed interest in sewing. Small businesses that are innovative, adaptive, and have sufficient funding will likely be the businesses that survive this recession.

As the pandemic hit, lockdowns were instituted in both rich and poor neighborhoods triggering reduced consumer spending.  However, a Harvard study showed that consumers in affluent ZIP codes cut their spending by 70% while spending in lower income ZIP codes saw only a 30% dip.  Of major concern, even after states opened their economies for business spending in the affluent neighborhoods did not return to pre-pandemic baseline spending levels.  The decline in affluent area spending forced small businesses in those ZIP codes to lay off 65% of their workers, versus businesses in low income areas which laid off 30% of their staff.  The affluent consumers had higher discretionary income so when they stopped spending there was a greater spending decline.  Small businesses catering to these affluent consumers had strong businesses but when discretionary purchases stopped their business income dropped significantly. In lower income neighborhoods small businesses were providing more essential goods and services so workers continued to buy.  Also, some affluent consumers left core city neighborhoods. Nicholas Colas, cofounder, DataTrek Research has observed a drop in income for small businesses near his Midtown Manhattan home. He notes, “(my) neighbors have fled to their second homes or rented homes. The small businesses that depend on their physical presence in the city have seen business dry up.” The implication is that virus safety concerns of high income consumers were more of a critical factor in local spending than states opening their economies.

The impact of the economic decline has hit minority owned small businesses harder than white owned firms.

Source: Bloomberg – 6/8/20

By April, there was a 41% decline in black owned businesses or nearly three times the loss of white owned businesses.  Lockdowns forced many minority businesses to close in already low income neighborhoods forcing increased unemployment while threatening their limited financial security.

In addition, the small business sector faces a major headwind in new business creation. The following chart from the Kauffman Foundation shows the predicted trend for new business applications which include forecasts for hiring or wages planned.  There is a 37 % decline in the April – May timeframe from the predicted number of applications likely to be filed compared to 2019.  Small businesses are a major job creation segment of our economy so the decline of the creation of new businesses is a concern.

Source: The Kauffman Foundation – 5/2020

We expect four waves of economic activity that fit within a standard U-shaped recession model consisting of contraction, trough and recovery phases. Today, we are in the early stages of the contraction phase of the overall economic cycle. (Please see our post, COVID-19 Triggers Transformation Into A New Economy – Part 1 on a U-Shaped economic cycle and indicators to watch).   The first and second waves outlined below complete the contraction phase. Wave three is a trough phase of low economic activity. Finally, wave four emerges in the recovery phase where ‘green shoots’ begin to appear as business models that are working turn profitable and begin to take hold across the economy.

Wave 1 – Shock – Today, there is financial relief for some small businesses from the Payroll Protection Program (PPP), $1200 checks to consumers, Fed bond buying, Fed Main Street Loan Program which has been slow getting started,  48% of small businesses report not making their full June rent payment, and retail foot traffic is slowly returning.  But, retail sales are still 16% below pre-pandemic levels (chart below):

Sources: Google, Macrobond, ANZ Research, The Wall Street Journal, The Daily Shot – 6/23/20

COVID-19 infections are rising in 23 states which account for 25% to 33% of national GDP. Goldman Sachs rates the R0 (or rate of one person infecting another) factor at 1.1 nationally or doubling of infections every 59 days. The rise in infections will likely cause a significant economic disruption. A high vulnerable group, Baby Boomers account for 30% to 35% of consumer spending. They are likely to be concerned about their safety. Thus, they will be reluctant to leave home causing reduced consumer spending, according to Deutsche Bank.

  • The weakest small businesses are not financially viable  – 100k – 250k small businesses close (Harvard Business School Study, May 2020)

Wave 2 – Relief Runs Out– In the near term future, due to lack of bipartisanship in Congress, PPP relief funding is renewed for only five weeks, relief checks will stop to consumers, there will be limited major company hiring due to lack of demand, some creative small businesses will adapt, others do not, but demand is capped by 25% permanent layoffs by small businesses by January, 2021.

  • COVID -19 second wave will hit many states causing significant economic disruption, – 2M – 3M small businesses close

Wave 3 – Economic Feedback Loop Sets In –  In the intermediate future, permanent layoffs will continue, many more mortgages will go into default, consumer confidence will continue to decline based on fear of layoffs even for those with jobs. A COVID-19 vaccine, or Herd Immunity will take hold, for those consumers with money and jobs spending will begin to rise yet below pre-pandemic levels due to uncertainty.

  • So many workers will be jobless that the economy is stuck at a depressed level. 3M – 4M small businesses close

To mitigate a deep economic Wave 3, we look for state and local governments, private equity firms and corporations to invest in the economy. The federal government must implement a national strategic program of testing, tracing and treatment to control the COVID-19 virus.  Only when consumers feel comfortable resuming their pre-pandemic activities will the economy be able to build on a solid economic foundation necessary for recovery. Wave 3 will last longer and have a tighter grip unless significant government investments are made in infrastructure, job training for new types of work to match labor better to job openings, and climate change solution job opportunities.

Wave 4 – Recovery Begins – innovative small businesses with solid business models and good cash flow begin to grow from increased consumer spending.  The federal government begins to focus on investment initiatives like infrastructure spending.  Longer term focused business development programs finally take hold as suggested in Wave 3 above on how to mitigate a deeper Wave 3 trough.

  • Renewing economic activities will begin to take hold – 400k -500K new small businesses open

Federal Relief Programs Fall Short

Many small business owners fault the federal funding programs for not being flexible enough to pay for services, product maintenance, insurance, vendors and other essential needs that are not payroll related. Let’s look at where the federal programs worked to provide relief to small businesses and where they did not meet the financial needs of small business owners.

In early April, Phase One of the PPP was quickly funded by Congress. The CARES Act in implementing the PPP focused on providing funding to small businesses who would keep employees on staff.  Thus, a key provision to receive funds was companies had to use 75% of the funds for payroll and only 25% for other expenses if the loan was to be forgiven at the end of the June 30th period.  Subsequently, Congress a few weeks ago passed a set of changes to the PPP law which extend the payroll funding time frame from 8 weeks to 24 weeks, hiring for the forgivable loan to December 31, 2020, and unforgiven part of the loan time frame for payback was extended from 2 years to 5 years. The funds available for payroll was lowered to 60% with 40% to other essential costs like rent and utilities. Many small businesses did not have an opportunity to receive Phase One funds as the money went to existing large bank customers and many major corporations. A major benefit of the PPP program was conversion of the loan to a grant if funds were used primarily for keeping employees on payroll. Congress passed a second law providing an additional $484 billion for PPP funding. Banks began taking applications on April 30th, focusing their loan underwriting activity on those small businesses left out of the Phase One. 

The National Federation of Independent Businesses (NFIB) reports that 77% of its members have applied for PPP loans and 93 % of those have been approved. Thus, it is estimated that 22M small businesses have temporary funding to survive for the next 6 months. Yet, most small businesses are still in tight financial situation. Many small businesses that received funds in the first round spent the funds to keep employees off unemployment but their business has not reopened.  Now, business owners face consumers not coming back due to the virus infections increasing thereby running out of funds to survive until customers return. For example, the accommodation and food services sector was hit from March through May with 33 % of the job losses in the U.S. but only received 8% of PPP loans. There are 9M total businesses without grants or loans from the federal government who must turn to other financial sources.  Owners will need to tap their own savings, retirement, angel investors or family and friends to keep operating.

Congress authorized $600B for a new Federal Reserve Main Street loan program for businesses who were not interested in the PPP program or could not qualify.  The name of the program is a bit of a misnomer as corporations up to 15,000 employees and up to $5B in sales are eligible. The program was to start in early May, yet only two weeks ago did banks start to take applications. Interest from banks and businesses has been tepid due to certain provisions which are not attractive to borrowers. Provisions such as large loan sizes beginning at $500k to $10M and begin payments at 1 year.  Small businesses need loans ranging from $100k to $250k. Major banks are not interested in the program as well.  At first the Fed required banks to take 15% of the loan collateral with the Fed providing 85%.  The Fed since has changed loan provisions to offer loans starting at $250k, and extending the time frame out to 2 years to begin paying principal and interest only beginning after the 1st year.  Banks would only have to take 5% of the loan on their books, with the Fed taking 95% of the loan value on its books.  Business have found the paper work to be too complicated, and major banks are not interested in actively marketing the program. The Main Street initiative was well intended but falls short and comes too late to meet the needs of business owners already short on cash. It seems in retrospect that involving community banks that are closest to small businesses in the development of a fast track focused loan program on the unique needs of small businesses would have been more effective.

The result of these federal programs time limits and relief orientation is that they don’t begin to take on the huge small business development challenge for the real possibility that 30 – 40 % of the non PPP relief businesses or 3M will face insolvency by January 2021.

The PPP and other relief programs will likely need to be extended beyond the five weeks now anticipated by Congress. However, what is really needed is a long term solution to small business development.  In our post, COVID-19 Triggers Transformation Into A New Economy – Part 2, we propose the idea of building a self-renewing economic ecosystem of venture capitalists, angel investors, company incubators, universities and local government to build small businesses. Areas that have successfully used the self-renewing economic model include:  Portland, Oregon with their Silicon Forest, and Salt Lake City has their Silicon Slope.

We need an imaginative vision for America that includes workers at all income levels and makes labor’s role in the economy a partnership with capital.  We will pull out of the recession faster with a longer expansion if we build an economy that works for all.

Investment Opportunities

Now is a good time for investors to review their investments and consider new investments while rebalancing portfolios.  Rebalancing portfolios based on considering both return and the financial needs of small businesses is crucial to our economy and communities. Outlined below are a set of investments to review. Investors will want to conduct more in depth research to assess how these types of investments will meet their portfolio objectives.

Community Banks

Local banks provide the cash life blood of many small businesses.  Most small businesses do not have accounts at major banks but instead rely on their local banker for loans and credit accounts.  Moving funds from a big five bank to a local bank will provide more financial support for local businesses. On a national level investors can invest in indexes that focus on community and small banks in the U.S., for example: KBWB

Non-Bank PPP Providers

These companies serve millions of small business owners, many of whom are sole proprietorships and mom and pop stores. They have the AI and advanced technology to process these loans, as well as strong relationships with many borrowers who regularly use their concierge-type services. Plus, they are certified PPP loan providers to small businesses that use their services.  Examples of Non-bank PPP providers are Intuit, Square and PayPal

Community Development Financial Institutions – CDFIs

CDFIs are mission-driven financial institutions that have been certified by the U.S. Department of the Treasury. CDFIs include credit unions, banks, loan funds, and venture capital funds that operate with a primary mission of serving small businesses and low-income communities. Over the past 35 years, CDFIs have made $74B in loans to support over 400,000 small businesses with about 58% going to minority owners. The Treasury Department has funded the CDFI program for $250M this year, seeding additional investments by foundations, investors and banks.  Many small businesses were successful obtaining PPP loans with their local CDFI. There are 1120 certified financial institutions participating which includes 300 credit unions.  CDFIs offer not just capital to small businesses but provide coaching on how to write business plans, write a loan proposal to a bank or learn how to tighten accounting practices. Mark Ivancie, Director of Growth and Partnership for CNote, a software platform provider for CDFI investing, observes that investors “can gain a competitive return, support small businesses and have a social impact.”  Some CDFI investments offer returns from 2.25% to 4.00% depending on the term. 

Investors can allocate funds to CDFIs in two ways, directly and indirectly.  One example of a way to directly invest is with the Reinvestment Fund.  The fund has $1.5B in assets under management and focuses on small businesses, housing projects, access to health care, educational programs, and job initiatives.  Indirectly, funds can be placed via an innovative software platform like CNote to a nationally diverse set of CDFIs. CNote qualifies, monitors and manages all the details of investing in CDFIs. Both the Reinvestment Fund and CNote have taken steps to insure investors receive repayment of both principal and interest based on CDFI agreements, loan loss reserves and quality audits.

For a directory of local CDFIs in your community there is a Treasury site to download a spreadsheet, and then click on the city and state tabs to find a CDFI near you.

Patronage

A wider perspective on ‘investment’ may include patronage.  It would be helpful to pause and think of all the locally owned businesses we patronize. We suggest getting to know the owner, maybe there is a loan or some financial assistance that you can provide.  As a customer you know the quality of their product or service so you can assess the likelihood of the risk in your investment.  We often take local boutiques for granted as we drive by to buy a gift at Target for a birthday. Worse yet we just buy the birthday gift online from Amazon. At the least make sure you continue to go to their store for a curbside pickup of your purchase.  We depend on local services like barbershops, nail salons, laundries and many more that provide essential services. Consider making an advance payment on an upcoming service appointment to help the owner make ends meet until reopening.

Increasingly, younger generations are concerned with what types of businesses they spend their money. Barbara Kahn, professor of marketing at Wharton has observed a shift in purchase patterns of young shoppers. “We see Gen Z and the young people put their money where their mouths is. Now people think of the entire transaction of what they’re paying for. That there’s value in sustainable transactions, in supporting the local community, that’s over and above the value of the goods.”

Summary

Small businesses in our neighborhoods create a unique and rich culture for our communities or where we visit.  What would a New England seaport town be without local clam chowder or lobster roll?  Or New Orleans be without a Cajun blackened shrimp?  Or Southern California be without a Balboa Bar of a scoop of ice cream coated with chocolate and toppings on a stick. Beyond food we may like to shop for a local beach shirt, woven handbag, or table built of wood from indigenous trees.  All these things and experiences create a wonderful culture we enjoy, but many could be gone.

Community small businesses need our investment and patronage today more than ever. It is time to examine where we allocate our investments to make a difference in our community. In addition to impacting our health and economy, the virus is attacking the small business cultural fabric of our country. The survival of many small businesses is threatened. We have an opportunity to support their products and services to ensure they are open to provide jobs and enrich our communities.  

Patrick Hill is the Editor of The Progressive Ensignhttps://theprogressiveensign.com/ writes from the heart of Silicon Valley, leveraging 20 years of experience as an executive at firms like HP, Genentech, Verigy, Informatica, and Okta to provide investment and economic insights. Twitter: @PatrickHill1677

The post The Survival of Millions of Small Businesses Is Threatened appeared first on RIA.

Read More

Continue Reading

Spread & Containment

Four Years Ago This Week, Freedom Was Torched

Four Years Ago This Week, Freedom Was Torched

Authored by Jeffrey Tucker via The Brownstone Institute,

"Beware the Ides of March,” Shakespeare…

Published

on

Four Years Ago This Week, Freedom Was Torched

Authored by Jeffrey Tucker via The Brownstone Institute,

"Beware the Ides of March,” Shakespeare quotes the soothsayer’s warning Julius Caesar about what turned out to be an impending assassination on March 15. The death of American liberty happened around the same time four years ago, when the orders went out from all levels of government to close all indoor and outdoor venues where people gather. 

It was not quite a law and it was never voted on by anyone. Seemingly out of nowhere, people who the public had largely ignored, the public health bureaucrats, all united to tell the executives in charge – mayors, governors, and the president – that the only way to deal with a respiratory virus was to scrap freedom and the Bill of Rights. 

And they did, not only in the US but all over the world. 

The forced closures in the US began on March 6 when the mayor of Austin, Texas, announced the shutdown of the technology and arts festival South by Southwest. Hundreds of thousands of contracts, of attendees and vendors, were instantly scrapped. The mayor said he was acting on the advice of his health experts and they in turn pointed to the CDC, which in turn pointed to the World Health Organization, which in turn pointed to member states and so on. 

There was no record of Covid in Austin, Texas, that day but they were sure they were doing their part to stop the spread. It was the first deployment of the “Zero Covid” strategy that became, for a time, official US policy, just as in China. 

It was never clear precisely who to blame or who would take responsibility, legal or otherwise. 

This Friday evening press conference in Austin was just the beginning. By the next Thursday evening, the lockdown mania reached a full crescendo. Donald Trump went on nationwide television to announce that everything was under control but that he was stopping all travel in and out of US borders, from Europe, the UK, Australia, and New Zealand. American citizens would need to return by Monday or be stuck. 

Americans abroad panicked while spending on tickets home and crowded into international airports with waits up to 8 hours standing shoulder to shoulder. It was the first clear sign: there would be no consistency in the deployment of these edicts. 

There is no historical record of any American president ever issuing global travel restrictions like this without a declaration of war. Until then, and since the age of travel began, every American had taken it for granted that he could buy a ticket and board a plane. That was no longer possible. Very quickly it became even difficult to travel state to state, as most states eventually implemented a two-week quarantine rule. 

The next day, Friday March 13, Broadway closed and New York City began to empty out as any residents who could went to summer homes or out of state. 

On that day, the Trump administration declared the national emergency by invoking the Stafford Act which triggers new powers and resources to the Federal Emergency Management Administration. 

In addition, the Department of Health and Human Services issued a classified document, only to be released to the public months later. The document initiated the lockdowns. It still does not exist on any government website.

The White House Coronavirus Response Task Force, led by the Vice President, will coordinate a whole-of-government approach, including governors, state and local officials, and members of Congress, to develop the best options for the safety, well-being, and health of the American people. HHS is the LFA [Lead Federal Agency] for coordinating the federal response to COVID-19.

Closures were guaranteed:

Recommend significantly limiting public gatherings and cancellation of almost all sporting events, performances, and public and private meetings that cannot be convened by phone. Consider school closures. Issue widespread ‘stay at home’ directives for public and private organizations, with nearly 100% telework for some, although critical public services and infrastructure may need to retain skeleton crews. Law enforcement could shift to focus more on crime prevention, as routine monitoring of storefronts could be important.

In this vision of turnkey totalitarian control of society, the vaccine was pre-approved: “Partner with pharmaceutical industry to produce anti-virals and vaccine.”

The National Security Council was put in charge of policy making. The CDC was just the marketing operation. That’s why it felt like martial law. Without using those words, that’s what was being declared. It even urged information management, with censorship strongly implied.

The timing here is fascinating. This document came out on a Friday. But according to every autobiographical account – from Mike Pence and Scott Gottlieb to Deborah Birx and Jared Kushner – the gathered team did not meet with Trump himself until the weekend of the 14th and 15th, Saturday and Sunday. 

According to their account, this was his first real encounter with the urge that he lock down the whole country. He reluctantly agreed to 15 days to flatten the curve. He announced this on Monday the 16th with the famous line: “All public and private venues where people gather should be closed.”

This makes no sense. The decision had already been made and all enabling documents were already in circulation. 

There are only two possibilities. 

One: the Department of Homeland Security issued this March 13 HHS document without Trump’s knowledge or authority. That seems unlikely. 

Two: Kushner, Birx, Pence, and Gottlieb are lying. They decided on a story and they are sticking to it. 

Trump himself has never explained the timeline or precisely when he decided to greenlight the lockdowns. To this day, he avoids the issue beyond his constant claim that he doesn’t get enough credit for his handling of the pandemic.

With Nixon, the famous question was always what did he know and when did he know it? When it comes to Trump and insofar as concerns Covid lockdowns – unlike the fake allegations of collusion with Russia – we have no investigations. To this day, no one in the corporate media seems even slightly interested in why, how, or when human rights got abolished by bureaucratic edict. 

As part of the lockdowns, the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency, which was and is part of the Department of Homeland Security, as set up in 2018, broke the entire American labor force into essential and nonessential.

They also set up and enforced censorship protocols, which is why it seemed like so few objected. In addition, CISA was tasked with overseeing mail-in ballots. 

Only 8 days into the 15, Trump announced that he wanted to open the country by Easter, which was on April 12. His announcement on March 24 was treated as outrageous and irresponsible by the national press but keep in mind: Easter would already take us beyond the initial two-week lockdown. What seemed to be an opening was an extension of closing. 

This announcement by Trump encouraged Birx and Fauci to ask for an additional 30 days of lockdown, which Trump granted. Even on April 23, Trump told Georgia and Florida, which had made noises about reopening, that “It’s too soon.” He publicly fought with the governor of Georgia, who was first to open his state. 

Before the 15 days was over, Congress passed and the president signed the 880-page CARES Act, which authorized the distribution of $2 trillion to states, businesses, and individuals, thus guaranteeing that lockdowns would continue for the duration. 

There was never a stated exit plan beyond Birx’s public statements that she wanted zero cases of Covid in the country. That was never going to happen. It is very likely that the virus had already been circulating in the US and Canada from October 2019. A famous seroprevalence study by Jay Bhattacharya came out in May 2020 discerning that infections and immunity were already widespread in the California county they examined. 

What that implied was two crucial points: there was zero hope for the Zero Covid mission and this pandemic would end as they all did, through endemicity via exposure, not from a vaccine as such. That was certainly not the message that was being broadcast from Washington. The growing sense at the time was that we all had to sit tight and just wait for the inoculation on which pharmaceutical companies were working. 

By summer 2020, you recall what happened. A restless generation of kids fed up with this stay-at-home nonsense seized on the opportunity to protest racial injustice in the killing of George Floyd. Public health officials approved of these gatherings – unlike protests against lockdowns – on grounds that racism was a virus even more serious than Covid. Some of these protests got out of hand and became violent and destructive. 

Meanwhile, substance abuse rage – the liquor and weed stores never closed – and immune systems were being degraded by lack of normal exposure, exactly as the Bakersfield doctors had predicted. Millions of small businesses had closed. The learning losses from school closures were mounting, as it turned out that Zoom school was near worthless. 

It was about this time that Trump seemed to figure out – thanks to the wise council of Dr. Scott Atlas – that he had been played and started urging states to reopen. But it was strange: he seemed to be less in the position of being a president in charge and more of a public pundit, Tweeting out his wishes until his account was banned. He was unable to put the worms back in the can that he had approved opening. 

By that time, and by all accounts, Trump was convinced that the whole effort was a mistake, that he had been trolled into wrecking the country he promised to make great. It was too late. Mail-in ballots had been widely approved, the country was in shambles, the media and public health bureaucrats were ruling the airwaves, and his final months of the campaign failed even to come to grips with the reality on the ground. 

At the time, many people had predicted that once Biden took office and the vaccine was released, Covid would be declared to have been beaten. But that didn’t happen and mainly for one reason: resistance to the vaccine was more intense than anyone had predicted. The Biden administration attempted to impose mandates on the entire US workforce. Thanks to a Supreme Court ruling, that effort was thwarted but not before HR departments around the country had already implemented them. 

As the months rolled on – and four major cities closed all public accommodations to the unvaccinated, who were being demonized for prolonging the pandemic – it became clear that the vaccine could not and would not stop infection or transmission, which means that this shot could not be classified as a public health benefit. Even as a private benefit, the evidence was mixed. Any protection it provided was short-lived and reports of vaccine injury began to mount. Even now, we cannot gain full clarity on the scale of the problem because essential data and documentation remains classified. 

After four years, we find ourselves in a strange position. We still do not know precisely what unfolded in mid-March 2020: who made what decisions, when, and why. There has been no serious attempt at any high level to provide a clear accounting much less assign blame. 

Not even Tucker Carlson, who reportedly played a crucial role in getting Trump to panic over the virus, will tell us the source of his own information or what his source told him. There have been a series of valuable hearings in the House and Senate but they have received little to no press attention, and none have focus on the lockdown orders themselves. 

The prevailing attitude in public life is just to forget the whole thing. And yet we live now in a country very different from the one we inhabited five years ago. Our media is captured. Social media is widely censored in violation of the First Amendment, a problem being taken up by the Supreme Court this month with no certainty of the outcome. The administrative state that seized control has not given up power. Crime has been normalized. Art and music institutions are on the rocks. Public trust in all official institutions is at rock bottom. We don’t even know if we can trust the elections anymore. 

In the early days of lockdown, Henry Kissinger warned that if the mitigation plan does not go well, the world will find itself set “on fire.” He died in 2023. Meanwhile, the world is indeed on fire. The essential struggle in every country on earth today concerns the battle between the authority and power of permanent administration apparatus of the state – the very one that took total control in lockdowns – and the enlightenment ideal of a government that is responsible to the will of the people and the moral demand for freedom and rights. 

How this struggle turns out is the essential story of our times. 

CODA: I’m embedding a copy of PanCAP Adapted, as annotated by Debbie Lerman. You might need to download the whole thing to see the annotations. If you can help with research, please do.

*  *  *

Jeffrey Tucker is the author of the excellent new book 'Life After Lock-Down'

Tyler Durden Mon, 03/11/2024 - 23:40

Read More

Continue Reading

Government

CDC Warns Thousands Of Children Sent To ER After Taking Common Sleep Aid

CDC Warns Thousands Of Children Sent To ER After Taking Common Sleep Aid

Authored by Jack Phillips via The Epoch Times (emphasis ours),

A…

Published

on

CDC Warns Thousands Of Children Sent To ER After Taking Common Sleep Aid

Authored by Jack Phillips via The Epoch Times (emphasis ours),

A U.S. Centers for Disease Control (CDC) paper released Thursday found that thousands of young children have been taken to the emergency room over the past several years after taking the very common sleep-aid supplement melatonin.

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) headquarters in Atlanta, Georgia, on April 23, 2020. (Tami Chappell/AFP via Getty Images)

The agency said that melatonin, which can come in gummies that are meant for adults, was implicated in about 7 percent of all emergency room visits for young children and infants “for unsupervised medication ingestions,” adding that many incidents were linked to the ingestion of gummy formulations that were flavored. Those incidents occurred between the years 2019 and 2022.

Melatonin is a hormone produced by the human body to regulate its sleep cycle. Supplements, which are sold in a number of different formulas, are generally taken before falling asleep and are popular among people suffering from insomnia, jet lag, chronic pain, or other problems.

The supplement isn’t regulated by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration and does not require child-resistant packaging. However, a number of supplement companies include caps or lids that are difficult for children to open.

The CDC report said that a significant number of melatonin-ingestion cases among young children were due to the children opening bottles that had not been properly closed or were within their reach. Thursday’s report, the agency said, “highlights the importance of educating parents and other caregivers about keeping all medications and supplements (including gummies) out of children’s reach and sight,” including melatonin.

The approximately 11,000 emergency department visits for unsupervised melatonin ingestions by infants and young children during 2019–2022 highlight the importance of educating parents and other caregivers about keeping all medications and supplements (including gummies) out of children’s reach and sight.

The CDC notes that melatonin use among Americans has increased five-fold over the past 25 years or so. That has coincided with a 530 percent increase in poison center calls for melatonin exposures to children between 2012 and 2021, it said, as well as a 420 percent increase in emergency visits for unsupervised melatonin ingestion by young children or infants between 2009 and 2020.

Some health officials advise that children under the age of 3 should avoid taking melatonin unless a doctor says otherwise. Side effects include drowsiness, headaches, agitation, dizziness, and bed wetting.

Other symptoms of too much melatonin include nausea, diarrhea, joint pain, anxiety, and irritability. The supplement can also impact blood pressure.

However, there is no established threshold for a melatonin overdose, officials have said. Most adult melatonin supplements contain a maximum of 10 milligrams of melatonin per serving, and some contain less.

Many people can tolerate even relatively large doses of melatonin without significant harm, officials say. But there is no antidote for an overdose. In cases of a child accidentally ingesting melatonin, doctors often ask a reliable adult to monitor them at home.

Dr. Cora Collette Breuner, with the Seattle Children’s Hospital at the University of Washington, told CNN that parents should speak with a doctor before giving their children the supplement.

“I also tell families, this is not something your child should take forever. Nobody knows what the long-term effects of taking this is on your child’s growth and development,” she told the outlet. “Taking away blue-light-emitting smartphones, tablets, laptops, and television at least two hours before bed will keep melatonin production humming along, as will reading or listening to bedtime stories in a softly lit room, taking a warm bath, or doing light stretches.”

In 2022, researchers found that in 2021, U.S. poison control centers received more than 52,000 calls about children consuming worrisome amounts of the dietary supplement. That’s a six-fold increase from about a decade earlier. Most such calls are about young children who accidentally got into bottles of melatonin, some of which come in the form of gummies for kids, the report said.

Dr. Karima Lelak, an emergency physician at Children’s Hospital of Michigan and the lead author of the study published in 2022 by the CDC, found that in about 83 percent of those calls, the children did not show any symptoms.

However, other children had vomiting, altered breathing, or other symptoms. Over the 10 years studied, more than 4,000 children were hospitalized, five were put on machines to help them breathe, and two children under the age of two died. Most of the hospitalized children were teenagers, and many of those ingestions were thought to be suicide attempts.

Those researchers also suggested that COVID-19 lockdowns and virtual learning forced more children to be at home all day, meaning there were more opportunities for kids to access melatonin. Also, those restrictions may have caused sleep-disrupting stress and anxiety, leading more families to consider melatonin, they suggested.

The Associated Press contributed to this report.

Tyler Durden Mon, 03/11/2024 - 21:40

Read More

Continue Reading

International

Red Candle In The Wind

Red Candle In The Wind

By Benjamin PIcton of Rabobank

February non-farm payrolls superficially exceeded market expectations on Friday by…

Published

on

Red Candle In The Wind

By Benjamin PIcton of Rabobank

February non-farm payrolls superficially exceeded market expectations on Friday by printing at 275,000 against a consensus call of 200,000. We say superficially, because the downward revisions to prior months totalled 167,000 for December and January, taking the total change in employed persons well below the implied forecast, and helping the unemployment rate to pop two-ticks to 3.9%. The U6 underemployment rate also rose from 7.2% to 7.3%, while average hourly earnings growth fell to 0.2% m-o-m and average weekly hours worked languished at 34.3, equalling pre-pandemic lows.

Undeterred by the devil in the detail, the algos sprang into action once exchanges opened. Market darling NVIDIA hit a new intraday high of $974 before (presumably) the humans took over and sold the stock down more than 10% to close at $875.28. If our suspicions are correct that it was the AIs buying before the humans started selling (no doubt triggering trailing stops on the way down), the irony is not lost on us.

The 1-day chart for NVIDIA now makes for interesting viewing, because the red candle posted on Friday presents quite a strong bearish engulfing signal. Volume traded on the day was almost double the 15-day simple moving average, and similar price action is observable on the 1-day charts for both Intel and AMD. Regular readers will be aware that we have expressed incredulity in the past about the durability the AI thematic melt-up, so it will be interesting to see whether Friday’s sell off is just a profit-taking blip, or a genuine trend reversal.

AI equities aside, this week ought to be important for markets because the BTFP program expires today. That means that the Fed will no longer be loaning cash to the banking system in exchange for collateral pledged at-par. The KBW Regional Banking index has so far taken this in its stride and is trading 30% above the lows established during the mini banking crisis of this time last year, but the Fed’s liquidity facility was effectively an exercise in can-kicking that makes regional banks a sector of the market worth paying attention to in the weeks ahead. Even here in Sydney, regulators are warning of external risks posed to the banking sector from scheduled refinancing of commercial real estate loans following sharp falls in valuations.

Markets are sending signals in other sectors, too. Gold closed at a new record-high of $2178/oz on Friday after trading above $2200/oz briefly. Gold has been going ballistic since the Friday before last, posting gains even on days where 2-year Treasury yields have risen. Gold bugs are buying as real yields fall from the October highs and inflation breakevens creep higher. This is particularly interesting as gold ETFs have been recording net outflows; suggesting that price gains aren’t being driven by a retail pile-in. Are gold buyers now betting on a stagflationary outcome where the Fed cuts without inflation being anchored at the 2% target? The price action around the US CPI release tomorrow ought to be illuminating.

Leaving the day-to-day movements to one side, we are also seeing further signs of structural change at the macro level. The UK budget last week included a provision for the creation of a British ISA. That is, an Individual Savings Account that provides tax breaks to savers who invest their money in the stock of British companies. This follows moves last year to encourage pension funds to head up the risk curve by allocating 5% of their capital to unlisted investments.

As a Hail Mary option for a government cruising toward an electoral drubbing it’s a curious choice, but it’s worth highlighting as cash-strapped governments increasingly see private savings pools as a funding solution for their spending priorities.

Of course, the UK is not alone in making creeping moves towards financial repression. In contrast to announcements today of increased trade liberalisation, Australian Treasurer Jim Chalmers has in the recent past flagged his interest in tapping private pension savings to fund state spending priorities, including defence, public housing and renewable energy projects. Both the UK and Australia appear intent on finding ways to open up the lungs of their economies, but government wants more say in directing private capital flows for state goals.

So, how far is the blurring of the lines between free markets and state planning likely to go? Given the immense and varied budgetary (and security) pressures that governments are facing, could we see a re-up of WWII-era Victory bonds, where private investors are encouraged to do their patriotic duty by directly financing government at negative real rates?

That would really light a fire under the gold market.

Tyler Durden Mon, 03/11/2024 - 19:00

Read More

Continue Reading

Trending