Connect with us

History Not Repeating: Why Today’s Housing Market Won’t Turn into 2008’s

Today’s housing fundamentals — including supply, demand and overall financial conditions — are markedly different than in 2008.
The post History Not Repeating: Why Today’s Housing Market Won’t Turn into 2008’s appeared first on Zillow Research.

Published

on

  • Today's housing fundamentals — including supply, demand and overall financial conditions — are markedly different than in 2008, and current conditions are largely sustainable.
  • Housing supply is extremely tight — arguably the one factor most dramatically different today from the 2008-era market, when a wave of foreclosures following years of robust homebuilding pushed supply well ahead of demand and led prices to collapse.
  • Demand will stay strong as the large millennial generation continues to age into homeownership, and more inventory is expected to soon hit the market — bringing more balance to the market and creating a smoother experience for everyone. 

The great reshuffling in housing that began roughly a year ago at the outset of the pandemic — and the heightened housing demand, elevated home sales activity and rapid price appreciation that came with it — is only just beginning, and will not simply end as the pandemic slowly begins to recede. Housing demand will stay strong, sales volumes will continue to grow and more balance between home buyers and sellers will help ensure sustainable health in housing for years to come.

Those with an eye on recent history can't be blamed for thinking current market conditions are nearing their endgame, with rapid price appreciation and fierce competition for homes eerily reminiscent of the late stages of the mid-2000s housing boom. March marked the largest one-month increase ever recorded in the more than 25-year history of the Zillow Home Value Index — surpassing even the housing run-up preceding the Great Recession — and the 10.6% rise from March 2020 was the largest annual increase in 15 years. 

But that view ignores the fact that the housing market doesn't operate in a vacuum, and is driven by the interactions of a number of relatively simple but critically important fundamentals — including supply and demand, financial conditions and technological advancement. And the state of those fundamentals in 2021 is ultimately far healthier, and that health far more likely to be sustainable over the longer-term, than the out-of-whack fundamentals from a generation ago. 

Examining each of these fundamental pieces on their own, including how each has evolved to its current point and how they are different from 2008, can help us paint a bigger picture of a housing market positioned to see the boom of the past year continue to roll on.

Demand

Demand for housing has steadily grown in recent years, driven by a number of factors that are fundamentally different from 2008: longer-running demographic shifts, continued recovery from the Great Recession, and recent pandemic-related housing considerations and low mortgage rates that have pushed demand into overdrive. 

Millennials are aging into their prime home-buying ages & overcoming obstacles

Unlike 2008, when a large portion of demand was driven by somewhat artificial factors that ultimately turned out to be unsustainable, including easy access to cheap mortgage financing, demand today and going forward is driven by several largely healthy and durable trends we expect to continue for years.

The first factor driving demand is a huge demographic shift that has been steadily unfolding for the past several years. The massive millennial generation — some 72 million strong in 2019 — the oldest of whom are approaching their 40s, is aging into their prime career-building, family-starting and home-buying years. The median age of first-time home buyers is generally in the early-mid thirties, and there are tens of millions of Americans at or approaching that threshold.

The combined numbers of millennials turning 34 over the next decade — the median age of first-time home buyers in 2019 — is roughly 46 million, the largest such number expected to reach that age in a single decade (The previous record prior to the Millennial generation was in 1989, when there were about 43 million 25-34 year old Boomers). And as millennials age, there are millions more of their younger peers in Gen Z behind them waiting in the wings. It adds up to millions of potential new buyers in years to come — representing "built-in" demand that is extremely unlikely to fade even if market conditions change in coming years.

A number of factors contributed to a slow start among the millennial generation in achieving homeownership, including stagnant income growth over the past decade, rising student debt burdens and the ongoing inventory crunch that limited access to entry-level homes more than most. There would be some 5.7 million additional households today if Americans formed households at the same rate they did in 2006. This is a testament to widespread difficulties in securing affordable, accessible housing over the past decade-plus, but also another potential indicator of enduring housing demand to come. But even at today's lower levels of household formation, there will still be 6.4 million more households in 2025 than there are today, simply because so many millennials are aging into their late 30s and wanting/needing to strike out on their own.

The pandemic sparked a Great Reshuffling that is in its early stages

In addition to this demographic-driven demand, the coronavirus pandemic itself drove housing demand even higher. Suddenly, many Americans who were no longer commuting and were instead spending almost all of their time at home were left with an entirely new set of criteria when considering what they wanted their home to be. 

But rather than acting as a one-time demand stimulus, there are ample reasons to believe these reshuffling and reconsideration trends have only just begun. An overwhelming majority (95%) of experts recently surveyed by Zillow said the consumer preference for working from home at least part-time will be an enduring legacy of the pandemic. Prior Zillow research found that almost 2 million U.S. renters that currently can't comfortably afford to buy an entry-level home in their current metro area could potentially afford the nation's typical starter home if they took advantage of increased telework options and moved to a less-expensive locale. As more companies consider making more-flexible work-from-home arrangements permanent, the future boost to demand could be significant.  

Historically low mortgage rates boost buying power

This wave of buyers already in or soon-to-enter the market do face challenges given the limited number of homes available to buy (more on that below) and cutthroat competition. But buyers today who can qualify for a loan, save an adequate down payment and find a home to buy do enjoy some advantages over buyers from previous generations — namely, historically low mortgage interest rates, which help stretch buyers' budgets by keeping monthly payments relatively affordable.

It's likely these low interest rates pulled some demand forward in 2020 — bringing buyers into the market sooner than they might have otherwise planned so they could lock in a low rate and avoid the possibility that rates would be higher if they stuck to their original timeline. But rather than serving to boost demand today at the expense of tomorrow, the pool of current and coming millennial and Gen Z buyers is very likely more than deep enough to ensure that won't happen. 

Supply

The glaring lack of homes available to buy relative to robust demand is probably the most visible (or invisible) trend defining the housing market in 2021. This mismatch between limited supply and sky-high demand is the single-largest factor driving home values up at a record pace, and the time homes spend on the market before selling to record lows. It is also arguably the one factor most dramatically different from the 2008-era market, when a wave of foreclosures following years of robust homebuilding pushed supply well ahead of demand and led prices to collapse.

It has taken years for home building to get back to pre-2008 levels

There were less than 1 million homes listed for sale nationwide in March (966,970), down 1.1% from February and 32% from March 2020 - the 18th straight month of annual declines, and the 12th consecutive month those declines have exceeded 10%. 

There is no single reason that explains the current housing deficit. Instead, it is a mix of broad short- and longer-term trends that came together last year and are continuing to play out as the market moves forward. Longer-term, in the years immediately following the Great Recession, home building activity fell far below what was needed to keep pace with population growth, as builders worked through a glut of unsold supply left over from the last gasps of the housing boom. Burned by this excess, it would take more than a decade for builders to again reach 1.6 million housing starts in a month — a level that consistently represented the floor and not the ceiling of building activity throughout the early-mid 2000s. And building is desperately needed — the homeowner vacancy rate was just 0.9% in Q1 2021, tied for the lowest single quarterly rate, prior to 2020, since 1978; the last time the four-quarter rolling average of homeowner vacancy was as low as it is currently was 1957. When there are so few vacant homes to sell and potentially add to supply, building needs to fill much of the void.

Pandemic uncertainty left many potential sellers on the sidelines

More recently, housing supply has been constrained by a number of shorter-term factors that are likely to ease in coming months and years. Many homeowners in search of more space or safety were pushed to move because of the pandemic. But the coronavirus also introduced broad uncertainty and anxiety into the market, pushing many would-be sellers to reconsider listing their homes for sale and exposing themselves to perceived health risks if they didn't absolutely have to. And the ongoing shortage of homes itself may also have created a self-reinforcing cycle of housing musical chairs: Potential sellers were afraid of standing up and listing their home for sale, lest they find themselves unable to find a different home to settle into.

Low inventory hasn't meaningfully slowed home sales

It's worth noting here that the number of closed home sales continued to grow in late 2020 and into 2021, even as overall inventory plummeted. Zillow forecasts 6.4 million home sales in 2021, which would be up 13.5% from a robust 2020 and the strongest calendar year for sales since 2006.

The deciding factor allowing both low inventory and high sales is a drastic acceleration in the speed of the market itself, with buyers snapping up newly listed homes just days after they hit the market. Much of this was driven by necessity, and the need to act quickly to beat out competitors. But it was helped by increased adoption of new ways to discover, tour and ultimately transact on the homes we buy, which won't fade with the pandemic. Nearly 60% of millennials say they would be at least somewhat comfortable making an offer on a home without touring in person if they’ve viewed a virtual tour, and almost 40% even say they would be comfortable buying a home online. And 79% of Americans say they’d like to view a 3D virtual tour while shopping for a home. 

The inventory winds appear to be changing

Looking ahead, these dynamics working to keep inventory low appear to be changing for the better. More than two-thirds (69%) of a panel of real estate experts and economists recently surveyed by Zillow said they expect inventory will begin to grow in the second half of this year or the first half of 2022, for a number of reasons. Homeowners representing eight million households say they’re more likely to move and sell their home as a result of the pandemic. And widespread coronavirus vaccine distribution will make homeowners in 14 million households feel comfortable moving who don’t necessarily feel that way now. 

This shift may already be underway. While the early weeks of 2021 were marked by a scarcity of new home listings as sellers stayed on the sidelines in the face of an uptick in COVID-19 cases and a string of harsh winter weather, our data indicate they are starting to come back. New listings nationwide rose by 30% in the four weeks between late February and late March. A rapid pace of sales meant total inventory continued to decline in March, but the 1.1% monthly decline from February was the smallest since July 2020, and follows much larger monthly drops of 7.5% and 8.1% in February and January, respectively. Locally, inventory was actually up month-over-month in March in 19 of the nation's 50 largest metros - no large metros experienced monthly inventory gains in February. 

Builders, too, are doing their part and ramping up activity to levels not seen since prior to the Great Recession. Home building is not a particularly fast-moving process, and it will take time for builders to fully make up a years-long building deficit — especially as the costs of land, labor and especially lumber and other key materials keeps rising. But builder confidence is near all-time levels, the permit pipeline for future projects is strong and sustainable housing demand is a big reason for this change in fortunes.

Financial Conditions

Today's economic landscape presents a mixed picture as it relates to the housing market. Certainly the widespread job loss during the pandemic has left many households behind on their housing payments or missing out on savings that could eventually be used for a down payment. But historically low mortgage rates appear likely to remain for the foreseeable future, keeping monthly payments low and stretching would-be buyers' budgets. This will make homeownership easier to achieve for those that can qualify for a loan, save an adequate down payment and find a home in their price range. 

Mortgage rates are near all-time lows

Low mortgage interest rates help to bolster buyers' budgets even amid rapid price growth. It might be tempting to think the advantages enjoyed by buyers in 2020 — when rates reached all-time lows — are behind us, based on recent increases in rates on the standard, 30-year, fixed-rate mortgage.

But that ignores the longer view. Despite recent increases (moderated by a subsequent pull back in April), the fact is that mortgage interest rates are still in the lowest range they've ever been: Lower than the runup to the housing bust in 2008, lower than the economic boom that prevailed throughout the 1990s, and MUCH lower than prevailing rates in the 1980s when Baby Boomers were buying their first homes.

This sustained period of low rates has helped make homeownership more accessible and affordable for millions — especially compared to renting. As of January 2021, households that owned their home could expect to spend just 17.65% of their household income on their monthly housing payments, down from almost 20% just two years earlier. For reference, typical benchmarks say a household should not spend more than 30% of their income on a mortgage without being considered "housing cost-burdened."

The same point remains true even after accounting for lower incomes, smaller down payments, the past few months of appreciation and rising rates. Assuming median household income (which is lower than the median income of homeowning households) and a more-modest down payment of only 5% instead of the benchmark 20%, the monthly mortgage payment on the typical U.S. home in March would represent only about 27.2% of median household income.[1] In February 2007, when home values hit a then-record high before beginning a five-year decline, the monthly cost of the mortgage on a typical home using the same assumptions and interest rates at the time was about 39.8% of the median household income.[2] 

Despite almost a decade of often rapid home value appreciation, affordability today is much closer to where it was in February 2012 (24.7%)[3] — when home values hit their lowest point post-Great Recession, representing a remarkable bargain for buyers — than during the pre-recession years. The relative stability in home affordability over this period can be attributed in part to modest income gains, but more fully to the steady decline in mortgage interest rates that helped blunt the impact of rising home values.

The beneficial impact of low rates is obvious, but it's also critical to acknowledge several important realities — namely, that low mortgage interest rates don't do anything to help buyers clear the largest hurdle to homeownership: Saving for a down payment. As home prices have grown, so has the amount necessary for even a minimal down payment. In this sense, continued job growth and income gains — particularly among today's renters aiming to become tomorrow's buyers — will be essential to ensure savings rates stay sufficient to keep the pipeline of buyers full.

The pandemic has taken a heavy financial toll, but a foreclosure crisis is unlikely

None of this is to sweep the enormous economic challenges of the past year — and those that still remain — under the rug. Millions of homeowners in financial distress have applied for forbearance protection against delinquent payments on their mortgages, bringing back heartbreaking memories of the late-2000s foreclosure crisis. And more than 4 million American renters say they are at risk of eviction.

But while some will ultimately lose their home, it's likely that a large majority will not end up in foreclosure or receive an eviction notice — a panel of experts surveyed by Zillow in Q4 2020 said that 18% of the more than 2 million homeowners then in forbearance would ultimately be foreclosed upon. The share of at-risk renters who are evicted could be even smaller if landlords work with tenants on a mutually beneficial solution rather than pursuing eviction.

These are large numbers, but nowhere near the foreclosure-crisis levels that persisted for years during the worst of the recession. And tens of billions of dollars in approved federal aid for distressed renters and homeowners included in past congressional recovery packages is also available to help cushion the blow.

A big reason that the foreclosure wave that characterized the last recession is not expected to materialize in the wake of the 2020 recession — despite massive levels of unemployment and financial damage — is because of the recent strength of housing itself over the past several years. Housing was a main cause of the last recession, and falling home values pushed many homeowners into negative equity, or "underwater" — owing more on their mortgage than their home was reasonably worth on the open market. The negative equity rate peaked at 31.2% in Q1 2012, meaning almost a third of all U.S. homeowners with a mortgage were underwater at the time. When a homeowner is in negative equity, it can be very difficult to sell their home on the open market, leaving them few options if they can no longer afford to make their monthly payments. As a result, millions were foreclosed upon.

But today's conditions are vastly different. Housing didn't cause this recession, and instead has been a rare economic bright spot over the past year. A homeowner who purchased their home even as late as 2018 or 2019 that is facing financial difficulties today still has the advantage of having enjoyed many months of rapid gains in equity as home values have appreciated across the country. This gives them more options to potentially sell their home, even at a profit, rather than face foreclosure. 

And so:

All of this adds up to a market that is resting on well-developed, and largely sustainable fundamentals. Just because the headline statistics around rapid home value growth appear the same, rest assured that 2021 will NOT end up as a repeat of 2008. Demand will stay strong, and more inventory will soon hit the market — bringing more balance to the market and creating a smoother experience for everyone. Distressed homeowners and would-be buyers have more of a safety net today than in 2008, and the economic recovery that took years to materialize a generation ago is already underway as vaccines roll out and businesses reopen.

 

[1]Assuming a purchase price of $276,717 (the March level of the U.S. Zillow Home Value Index) with a 3.08% interest rate and a 5% down payment, the monthly payment would be $1,558, using standard assumptions about property taxes and insurance. The 2019 median household income was $68,703, or $5,725 per month.

[2]Assuming a purchase price of $215,486 (the February 2007 level of the U.S. Zillow Home Value Index) with a 6.29% interest rate and a 5% down payment, the monthly payment would be $1,666, using standard assumptions about property taxes and insurance. The 2007 median household income was $50,233, or $4,186 per month.

[3]Assuming a purchase price of $162,321 (the February 2012 level of the U.S. Zillow Home Value Index) with a 3.89% interest rate and a 5% down payment, the monthly payment would be $1,052, using standard assumptions about property taxes and insurance. The 2012 median household income was $51,017, or $4,251 per month.

The post History Not Repeating: Why Today's Housing Market Won't Turn into 2008's appeared first on Zillow Research.

Read More

Continue Reading

Government

Veterans Affairs Kept COVID-19 Vaccine Mandate In Place Without Evidence

Veterans Affairs Kept COVID-19 Vaccine Mandate In Place Without Evidence

Authored by Zachary Stieber via The Epoch Times (emphasis ours),

The…

Published

on

Veterans Affairs Kept COVID-19 Vaccine Mandate In Place Without Evidence

Authored by Zachary Stieber via The Epoch Times (emphasis ours),

The U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) reviewed no data when deciding in 2023 to keep its COVID-19 vaccine mandate in place.

Doses of a COVID-19 vaccine in Washington in a file image. (Jacquelyn Martin/Pool/AFP via Getty Images)

VA Secretary Denis McDonough said on May 1, 2023, that the end of many other federal mandates “will not impact current policies at the Department of Veterans Affairs.”

He said the mandate was remaining for VA health care personnel “to ensure the safety of veterans and our colleagues.”

Mr. McDonough did not cite any studies or other data. A VA spokesperson declined to provide any data that was reviewed when deciding not to rescind the mandate. The Epoch Times submitted a Freedom of Information Act for “all documents outlining which data was relied upon when establishing the mandate when deciding to keep the mandate in place.”

The agency searched for such data and did not find any.

The VA does not even attempt to justify its policies with science, because it can’t,” Leslie Manookian, president and founder of the Health Freedom Defense Fund, told The Epoch Times.

“The VA just trusts that the process and cost of challenging its unfounded policies is so onerous, most people are dissuaded from even trying,” she added.

The VA’s mandate remains in place to this day.

The VA’s website claims that vaccines “help protect you from getting severe illness” and “offer good protection against most COVID-19 variants,” pointing in part to observational data from the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) that estimate the vaccines provide poor protection against symptomatic infection and transient shielding against hospitalization.

There have also been increasing concerns among outside scientists about confirmed side effects like heart inflammation—the VA hid a safety signal it detected for the inflammation—and possible side effects such as tinnitus, which shift the benefit-risk calculus.

President Joe Biden imposed a slate of COVID-19 vaccine mandates in 2021. The VA was the first federal agency to implement a mandate.

President Biden rescinded the mandates in May 2023, citing a drop in COVID-19 cases and hospitalizations. His administration maintains the choice to require vaccines was the right one and saved lives.

“Our administration’s vaccination requirements helped ensure the safety of workers in critical workforces including those in the healthcare and education sectors, protecting themselves and the populations they serve, and strengthening their ability to provide services without disruptions to operations,” the White House said.

Some experts said requiring vaccination meant many younger people were forced to get a vaccine despite the risks potentially outweighing the benefits, leaving fewer doses for older adults.

By mandating the vaccines to younger people and those with natural immunity from having had COVID, older people in the U.S. and other countries did not have access to them, and many people might have died because of that,” Martin Kulldorff, a professor of medicine on leave from Harvard Medical School, told The Epoch Times previously.

The VA was one of just a handful of agencies to keep its mandate in place following the removal of many federal mandates.

“At this time, the vaccine requirement will remain in effect for VA health care personnel, including VA psychologists, pharmacists, social workers, nursing assistants, physical therapists, respiratory therapists, peer specialists, medical support assistants, engineers, housekeepers, and other clinical, administrative, and infrastructure support employees,” Mr. McDonough wrote to VA employees at the time.

This also includes VA volunteers and contractors. Effectively, this means that any Veterans Health Administration (VHA) employee, volunteer, or contractor who works in VHA facilities, visits VHA facilities, or provides direct care to those we serve will still be subject to the vaccine requirement at this time,” he said. “We continue to monitor and discuss this requirement, and we will provide more information about the vaccination requirements for VA health care employees soon. As always, we will process requests for vaccination exceptions in accordance with applicable laws, regulations, and policies.”

The version of the shots cleared in the fall of 2022, and available through the fall of 2023, did not have any clinical trial data supporting them.

A new version was approved in the fall of 2023 because there were indications that the shots not only offered temporary protection but also that the level of protection was lower than what was observed during earlier stages of the pandemic.

Ms. Manookian, whose group has challenged several of the federal mandates, said that the mandate “illustrates the dangers of the administrative state and how these federal agencies have become a law unto themselves.”

Tyler Durden Sat, 03/09/2024 - 22:10

Read More

Continue Reading

Government

Are Voters Recoiling Against Disorder?

Are Voters Recoiling Against Disorder?

Authored by Michael Barone via The Epoch Times (emphasis ours),

The headlines coming out of the Super…

Published

on

Are Voters Recoiling Against Disorder?

Authored by Michael Barone via The Epoch Times (emphasis ours),

The headlines coming out of the Super Tuesday primaries have got it right. Barring cataclysmic changes, Donald Trump and Joe Biden will be the Republican and Democratic nominees for president in 2024.

(Left) President Joe Biden delivers remarks on canceling student debt at Culver City Julian Dixon Library in Culver City, Calif., on Feb. 21, 2024. (Right) Republican presidential candidate and former U.S. President Donald Trump stands on stage during a campaign event at Big League Dreams Las Vegas in Las Vegas, Nev., on Jan. 27, 2024. (Mario Tama/Getty Images; David Becker/Getty Images)

With Nikki Haley’s withdrawal, there will be no more significantly contested primaries or caucuses—the earliest both parties’ races have been over since something like the current primary-dominated system was put in place in 1972.

The primary results have spotlighted some of both nominees’ weaknesses.

Donald Trump lost high-income, high-educated constituencies, including the entire metro area—aka the Swamp. Many but by no means all Haley votes there were cast by Biden Democrats. Mr. Trump can’t afford to lose too many of the others in target states like Pennsylvania and Michigan.

Majorities and large minorities of voters in overwhelmingly Latino counties in Texas’s Rio Grande Valley and some in Houston voted against Joe Biden, and even more against Senate nominee Rep. Colin Allred (D-Texas).

Returns from Hispanic precincts in New Hampshire and Massachusetts show the same thing. Mr. Biden can’t afford to lose too many Latino votes in target states like Arizona and Georgia.

When Mr. Trump rode down that escalator in 2015, commentators assumed he’d repel Latinos. Instead, Latino voters nationally, and especially the closest eyewitnesses of Biden’s open-border policy, have been trending heavily Republican.

High-income liberal Democrats may sport lawn signs proclaiming, “In this house, we believe ... no human is illegal.” The logical consequence of that belief is an open border. But modest-income folks in border counties know that flows of illegal immigrants result in disorder, disease, and crime.

There is plenty of impatience with increased disorder in election returns below the presidential level. Consider Los Angeles County, America’s largest county, with nearly 10 million people, more people than 40 of the 50 states. It voted 71 percent for Mr. Biden in 2020.

Current returns show county District Attorney George Gascon winning only 21 percent of the vote in the nonpartisan primary. He’ll apparently face Republican Nathan Hochman, a critic of his liberal policies, in November.

Gascon, elected after the May 2020 death of counterfeit-passing suspect George Floyd in Minneapolis, is one of many county prosecutors supported by billionaire George Soros. His policies include not charging juveniles as adults, not seeking higher penalties for gang membership or use of firearms, and bringing fewer misdemeanor cases.

The predictable result has been increased car thefts, burglaries, and personal robberies. Some 120 assistant district attorneys have left the office, and there’s a backlog of 10,000 unprosecuted cases.

More than a dozen other Soros-backed and similarly liberal prosecutors have faced strong opposition or have left office.

St. Louis prosecutor Kim Gardner resigned last May amid lawsuits seeking her removal, Milwaukee’s John Chisholm retired in January, and Baltimore’s Marilyn Mosby was defeated in July 2022 and convicted of perjury in September 2023. Last November, Loudoun County, Virginia, voters (62 percent Biden) ousted liberal Buta Biberaj, who declined to prosecute a transgender student for assault, and in June 2022 voters in San Francisco (85 percent Biden) recalled famed radical Chesa Boudin.

Similarly, this Tuesday, voters in San Francisco passed ballot measures strengthening police powers and requiring treatment of drug-addicted welfare recipients.

In retrospect, it appears the Floyd video, appearing after three months of COVID-19 confinement, sparked a frenzied, even crazed reaction, especially among the highly educated and articulate. One fatal incident was seen as proof that America’s “systemic racism” was worse than ever and that police forces should be defunded and perhaps abolished.

2020 was “the year America went crazy,” I wrote in January 2021, a year in which police funding was actually cut by Democrats in New York, Los Angeles, San Francisco, Seattle, and Denver. A year in which young New York Times (NYT) staffers claimed they were endangered by the publication of Sen. Tom Cotton’s (R-Ark.) opinion article advocating calling in military forces if necessary to stop rioting, as had been done in Detroit in 1967 and Los Angeles in 1992. A craven NYT publisher even fired the editorial page editor for running the article.

Evidence of visible and tangible discontent with increasing violence and its consequences—barren and locked shelves in Manhattan chain drugstores, skyrocketing carjackings in Washington, D.C.—is as unmistakable in polls and election results as it is in daily life in large metropolitan areas. Maybe 2024 will turn out to be the year even liberal America stopped acting crazy.

Chaos and disorder work against incumbents, as they did in 1968 when Democrats saw their party’s popular vote fall from 61 percent to 43 percent.

Views expressed in this article are opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of The Epoch Times or ZeroHedge.

Tyler Durden Sat, 03/09/2024 - 23:20

Read More

Continue Reading

Spread & Containment

The Coming Of The Police State In America

The Coming Of The Police State In America

Authored by Jeffrey Tucker via The Epoch Times,

The National Guard and the State Police are now…

Published

on

The Coming Of The Police State In America

Authored by Jeffrey Tucker via The Epoch Times,

The National Guard and the State Police are now patrolling the New York City subway system in an attempt to do something about the explosion of crime. As part of this, there are bag checks and new surveillance of all passengers. No legislation, no debate, just an edict from the mayor.

Many citizens who rely on this system for transportation might welcome this. It’s a city of strict gun control, and no one knows for sure if they have the right to defend themselves. Merchants have been harassed and even arrested for trying to stop looting and pillaging in their own shops.

The message has been sent: Only the police can do this job. Whether they do it or not is another matter.

Things on the subway system have gotten crazy. If you know it well, you can manage to travel safely, but visitors to the city who take the wrong train at the wrong time are taking grave risks.

In actual fact, it’s guaranteed that this will only end in confiscating knives and other things that people carry in order to protect themselves while leaving the actual criminals even more free to prey on citizens.

The law-abiding will suffer and the criminals will grow more numerous. It will not end well.

When you step back from the details, what we have is the dawning of a genuine police state in the United States. It only starts in New York City. Where is the Guard going to be deployed next? Anywhere is possible.

If the crime is bad enough, citizens will welcome it. It must have been this way in most times and places that when the police state arrives, the people cheer.

We will all have our own stories of how this came to be. Some might begin with the passage of the Patriot Act and the establishment of the Department of Homeland Security in 2001. Some will focus on gun control and the taking away of citizens’ rights to defend themselves.

My own version of events is closer in time. It began four years ago this month with lockdowns. That’s what shattered the capacity of civil society to function in the United States. Everything that has happened since follows like one domino tumbling after another.

It goes like this:

1) lockdown,

2) loss of moral compass and spreading of loneliness and nihilism,

3) rioting resulting from citizen frustration, 4) police absent because of ideological hectoring,

5) a rise in uncontrolled immigration/refugees,

6) an epidemic of ill health from substance abuse and otherwise,

7) businesses flee the city

8) cities fall into decay, and that results in

9) more surveillance and police state.

The 10th stage is the sacking of liberty and civilization itself.

It doesn’t fall out this way at every point in history, but this seems like a solid outline of what happened in this case. Four years is a very short period of time to see all of this unfold. But it is a fact that New York City was more-or-less civilized only four years ago. No one could have predicted that it would come to this so quickly.

But once the lockdowns happened, all bets were off. Here we had a policy that most directly trampled on all freedoms that we had taken for granted. Schools, businesses, and churches were slammed shut, with various levels of enforcement. The entire workforce was divided between essential and nonessential, and there was widespread confusion about who precisely was in charge of designating and enforcing this.

It felt like martial law at the time, as if all normal civilian law had been displaced by something else. That something had to do with public health, but there was clearly more going on, because suddenly our social media posts were censored and we were being asked to do things that made no sense, such as mask up for a virus that evaded mask protection and walk in only one direction in grocery aisles.

Vast amounts of the white-collar workforce stayed home—and their kids, too—until it became too much to bear. The city became a ghost town. Most U.S. cities were the same.

As the months of disaster rolled on, the captives were let out of their houses for the summer in order to protest racism but no other reason. As a way of excusing this, the same public health authorities said that racism was a virus as bad as COVID-19, so therefore it was permitted.

The protests had turned to riots in many cities, and the police were being defunded and discouraged to do anything about the problem. Citizens watched in horror as downtowns burned and drug-crazed freaks took over whole sections of cities. It was like every standard of decency had been zapped out of an entire swath of the population.

Meanwhile, large checks were arriving in people’s bank accounts, defying every normal economic expectation. How could people not be working and get their bank accounts more flush with cash than ever? There was a new law that didn’t even require that people pay rent. How weird was that? Even student loans didn’t need to be paid.

By the fall, recess from lockdown was over and everyone was told to go home again. But this time they had a job to do: They were supposed to vote. Not at the polling places, because going there would only spread germs, or so the media said. When the voting results finally came in, it was the absentee ballots that swung the election in favor of the opposition party that actually wanted more lockdowns and eventually pushed vaccine mandates on the whole population.

The new party in control took note of the large population movements out of cities and states that they controlled. This would have a large effect on voting patterns in the future. But they had a plan. They would open the borders to millions of people in the guise of caring for refugees. These new warm bodies would become voters in time and certainly count on the census when it came time to reapportion political power.

Meanwhile, the native population had begun to swim in ill health from substance abuse, widespread depression, and demoralization, plus vaccine injury. This increased dependency on the very institutions that had caused the problem in the first place: the medical/scientific establishment.

The rise of crime drove the small businesses out of the city. They had barely survived the lockdowns, but they certainly could not survive the crime epidemic. This undermined the tax base of the city and allowed the criminals to take further control.

The same cities became sanctuaries for the waves of migrants sacking the country, and partisan mayors actually used tax dollars to house these invaders in high-end hotels in the name of having compassion for the stranger. Citizens were pushed out to make way for rampaging migrant hordes, as incredible as this seems.

But with that, of course, crime rose ever further, inciting citizen anger and providing a pretext to bring in the police state in the form of the National Guard, now tasked with cracking down on crime in the transportation system.

What’s the next step? It’s probably already here: mass surveillance and censorship, plus ever-expanding police power. This will be accompanied by further population movements, as those with the means to do so flee the city and even the country and leave it for everyone else to suffer.

As I tell the story, all of this seems inevitable. It is not. It could have been stopped at any point. A wise and prudent political leadership could have admitted the error from the beginning and called on the country to rediscover freedom, decency, and the difference between right and wrong. But ego and pride stopped that from happening, and we are left with the consequences.

The government grows ever bigger and civil society ever less capable of managing itself in large urban centers. Disaster is unfolding in real time, mitigated only by a rising stock market and a financial system that has yet to fall apart completely.

Are we at the middle stages of total collapse, or at the point where the population and people in leadership positions wise up and decide to put an end to the downward slide? It’s hard to know. But this much we do know: There is a growing pocket of resistance out there that is fed up and refuses to sit by and watch this great country be sacked and taken over by everything it was set up to prevent.

Tyler Durden Sat, 03/09/2024 - 16:20

Read More

Continue Reading

Trending