Connect with us

Uncategorized

Higher rates exposed Rocket’s vulnerability — can it prove itself as a fintech?

With rival UWM now the #1 mortgage lender in America, Rocket is betting on its platform to develop ‘sticky relationships’ with customers. Here’s our deep…

Published

on

Rocket Companies, the parent company of what was once the largest mortgage originator in the country, capitalized on the all-time low mortgage rates during the pandemic years, racking up record profits through an enormous amount of refinances. Last year, it originated $351 billion in total volume — with more than double the refi volume of any lender. 

But when mortgage rates started rising following downward pressures on inflation, its business took a hit and the unimaginable happened: Rocket Mortgage not only lost $166 million in the third quarter, but it fell from its throne. Rocket lost its origination crown to its chief antagonist United Wholesale Mortgage.

At $25.6 billion, Rocket’s origination volume in the quarter was 31% lower than that of Pontiac, Michigan-based UWM, which has been gobbling up market share with its aggressive pricing strategy in the broker channel.

To be clear, every lender has taken a hit this year, with the $4 trillion mortgage industry in 2021 declining to an estimated $1.7 trillion in 2022. But the high-rate environment seems to have exposed the vulnerability of lenders that are more reliant on refinancings through a call center model and don’t have strong relationships with real estate agents.

As the current high-rate business climate works against its refi-focused business model, Rocket is betting big on the strength of its platform – a single sign-on solution for the entire Rocket ecosystem consisting of real estate services, personal loans, used cars and rooftop solar systems through subsidiaries.

At stake is the title of the country’s largest mortgage originator — and proving its strategy of branding itself as a fintech which would enable Rocket to reach a bigger audience beyond the mortgage industry.

“As we navigate and adjust to the current environment, we’re continuing our long-term strategy of investing in our platform with an eye toward the future,” Brian Brown, Rocket’s CFO, emphasized to analysts in its recent earnings call.

Rocket is in a tough spot at the moment. UWM is aiming to cement its position as the country’s largest originator by undercutting competitors through cut-rate prices in the broker channel. Rocket is the second-largest player in wholesale and though it is a reliable source of purchase business, Rocket remains far behind UWM. 

While UWM faces a risk of losing market share when it pulls back from its aggressive pricing strategy, the wholesale lender says its bountiful profit of $325.6 million in the third quarter and improved liquidity position offsets the shrinking margins from its ‘Game On’ pricing.

“Honestly, for the next couple of years UWM is positioned a little better because they don’t have expenses like Rocket from going on to other ventures,” Kevin Heal, senior analyst at Argus Research, said. “They’re staying in the lane of being a wholesale lender.”

Rocket, whose executives have frequently spoken about the long game and the cyclicality of the mortgage industry, declined to comment for this story.

Is Rocket Mortgage waiting for another refi boom?

Though Rocket Companies has evolved from a single mortgage lender to an ecosystem of businesses involved in personal finance, auto sales, home sale and solar panels, its main source of revenue continues to be mortgages. About 94% of its generated total net revenue came from its direct-to-consumer and partner network mortgage segments year-to-date.

I think in some aspects they would like to be viewed as a proptech or fintech company. But at the end of the day, the core of the business is mortgage in our opinion.

Jay McCanless, senior vp at wedbush securities

“The mortgage business was such a large part of their business in 2021 to 2022; you’re not going to be able to replace that overnight,” Jay McCanless, senior vice president at Wedbush Securities, said. “I think in some aspects they would like to be viewed as a proptech or fintech company. But at the end of the day, the core of the business is mortgage in our opinion.” 

The Michigan lender boasts partnerships that include Salesforce – which allows Rocket to offer its mortgage technology to banks and credit unions that collectively originate $1 trillion in mortgages a year through Salesforce Financial Services Cloud – and Santander Bank, that allows Rocket Mortgage to originate mortgages for Santander clients. 

However, mortgage rates doubled from the start of the year to surpass 6% levels, and the lack of portfolio recapture have undoubtedly hurt Rocket’s mortgage business, Shampa Bhattacharya, director of the financial institutions group at Fitch Ratings, said. 

Roughly six of every seven U.S. homeowners with mortgages have a mortgage interest rate far below 6% levels, according to Redfin. Homeowners are discouraged from moving because selling their home and buying another could mean giving up their low mortgage rate and taking on a larger monthly housing bill, creating a “lock-in” effect across the country. 

Unlike UWM — which outsources its servicing, meaning that originations aren’t as dependent on the portfolio recapture aspect — Rocket owns those customer relationships and servicing portfolios, which would generate leads in a stronger refinance environment, Bhattacharya explained.

Rates are expected to go down to the 5% levels in 2023, but it’s highly unlikely that rates will decline to the 2 and 3% levels like it did in 2020 and 2021, raising questions on whether Rocket will be able to benefit from the refi boom as it did two years ago.

“Those loans would have really low customer acquisition costs, which is what makes them so attractive,” she said. “That business significantly reduced and it had a disproportionate impact on volumes and margins.” 

Not having a local presence through branches nor relationships with real estate agents – crucial for winning over referral businesses in a purchase market environment – is an Achilles heel for Rocket in the current market.

Rocket bankers work instead at centralized locations and are given leads that follow up on customer inquiries regarding ways to save money, a former Rocket banker who requested anonymity, said in an interview. 

“They had it set up where you would always get warm leads as much as you need for many hours a day,” said a former Rocket banker. “People inquired about saving money or cashing out, and a banker will follow up with them and transfer them over to a seasoned banker.” 

The former Rocket banker focused on refinancing mortgages to lower rates during his three years at the company, but after intense training sessions on mortgage products and sales techniques, which last about six to eight weeks, bankers are able to handle basically any type of calls, the former banker explained. 

In an effort to address criticism regarding the lack of relationships with real estate agents, Rocket set up a new team focused on cultivating relationships with real estate agents. However, the team was disbanded last year, according to a report by the Wall Street Journal in late October. Rocket didn’t provide comment on whether all the teams had been disbanded and whether it plans on setting them up again. 

If you can influence consumers through ongoing direct consumer marketing, that’s powerful if it works.

Andy Harris, President of vantage mortgage brokers

In a rising-rate environment, Rocket bankers have pivoted to persuading existing customers to get a cash-out refi — taking advantage of record home equity levels that ballooned during the pandemic, the Journal reported. 

It’s a tough sell.

Getting potential borrowers to trade a 3% mortgage for a 6% one is like “pushing rocks up hills,” Colin Wyzgoski, who quit his job as a banker in August after taking time off because of work stress, told the Journal.

There’s also heavy competition for Rocket bankers to contend with.

“With the market starting to shift, lenders are starting to show back up in the door,” Jeremy Blanton, a real estate agent at RE/MAX Southern Shores, told HousingWire. “Now that the refi market slowed down they have time and are doing the customer support for agents again.” 

For retail lenders, brand recognition is key. And this is where Rocket has a big advantage over others —when it comes to Rocket, arguably no one is better at marketing. It would be foolish to count out a company as well resourced and well known to consumers as Rocket is, observers said.

“If you can influence consumers through ongoing direct consumer marketing, that’s powerful if it works,” Andy Harris, president of Vantage Mortgage Brokers, said. 

Harris explained that younger generations are “more savvy because data is more readily available online” and that’s why Rocket is trying to bill itself to be a fintech company and try to attract the younger age homebuyers in a different way. 

Plenty of money on hand

For a company with a market cap of $15.5 billion and increased liquidity in the third quarter, Rocket is positioned to withstand the storm better than any other lender.  

It’s all about building the sticky relationship with the end customer and then selling them the products when any need arises for a mortgage and they already have the customer. If they come to Rocket, their customer acquisition costs are really low and their margins are high, that’s their business strategy.

Shampa Bhattacharya, director of the financial institutions group at Fitch Ratings

Having the cash and credit lines on hand to ride out the rough patches in the market — known as liquidity — could be what separates the winners from the losers in the mortgage industry.

“Rocket is willing to sacrifice some income for the next quarters to capture market share and pull guys out of business,” Heal said. “They have plenty of funding available to finance the mortgages in between the period when they are origination and when they get sold.”

Rocket’s SEC filing indicates that it ended the third quarter of 2022 with a “strong liquidity position,” which includes $800 million of cash on hand, $3.2 billion of corporate cash used to self-fund loan originations, a portion of which could be transferred to funding facilities – warehouse lines, which used to fund loan originations.

At the end of the third quarter, the value of mortgage servicing rights came in at $7.3 billion, an increase of $1.9 billion year-to-date. A rise in the fair market value of MSRs on Rocket’s balance sheet helps to bolster the lender’s asset position, which creates more collateral for borrowings or potential income from future MSR sales — all of which help pump up Rocket’s liquidity. 

For now, Rocket is “dealing with relatively low leverage and fairly efficient operations” but red flags to look for include large cash burns combined with significant MSR sales, according to analysts. 

“You are basically selling your forward cash flow at a discount rate,” Kevin Barker, managing director at Piper Sandler, said. “It’s selling your future earnings in order to maintain your current market share. That is ultimately going to be dilutive to long term franchise value.”

Rocket’s to-do list as a fintech

“Rocket is going into the quarter and the start of 2023 on a pretty cautious footing, it seems like they’re doing multiple things to expand the funnel,” McCanless said, adding that the company is getting creative to generate opportunities for purchase originations where they can.

The Detroit company claimed to have 24 million Rocket user accounts through Rocket Homes, Rocket Auto, Rocket Solar and Rocket Money as of the third quarter of 2022. The goal for Rocket is to bring these members into their business lines well before they are ready to buy a home — and get them to lock in mortgages when becoming homeowners. 

“It’s all about building the sticky relationship with the end customer and then selling them the products when any need arises for a mortgage and they already have the customer,” said Bhattacharya. “If they come to Rocket, their customer acquisition costs are really low and their margins are high, that’s their business strategy.”

With a larger top of the funnel and a lower client acquisition cost, higher conversion through deeper client insights and personalized offerings, and client retention with increased lifetime value, Rocket has a significant advantage over others in the space.

Jay Farner, CEO of Rocket Companies

The most recent example of that effort is the launch of Rocket Rewards, a loyalty program that distributes points toward financial transactions across the Rocket platform for potential homebuyers. In turn, homebuyers can use points to get discounts in their closing costs in the future.  

At the vanguard of Rocket’s efforts to be defined as a fintech is Rocket Money, the latest addition to the Rocket portfolio. Formerly known as Truebill — a personal finance app that helps people split bills and cancel subscriptions — Rocket acquired the business in December 2021. Rocket wants to use the app to acquire leads for the mortgage origination business at a lower customer acquisition cost.

“With a larger top of the funnel and a lower client acquisition cost, higher conversion through deeper client insights and personalized offerings, and client retention with increased lifetime value, Rocket has a significant advantage over others in the space,”Jay Farner, CEO of Rocket Companies, told analysts during its earnings call of Rocket’s long term strategy.

“As we see rates shift and adjust, if there’s an opportunity to help folks, we’re not marketing to a $2.5 million client base, we’re marketing to a $10 million client base, and that’s the vision of what we’re creating,” Farner said.

Rocket declined to make any executives available for interviews and referred to the third quarter earnings call for any details on Rocket Companies future plans. 

Despite Rocket’s ambitions, it’s likely going to take a couple of quarters before the lender returns to profitability.

“Considering how far origination demand has fallen and the significant consolidation that has occurred in the space, we believe Rocket will continue to produce slightly negative operating earnings for the next couple of quarters (absent a sharp drop in rates),” analysts at Piper Sandler wrote in a report following Rocket’s third quarter earnings.

“With the mortgage industry heading into the winter months, we might be going into a recession, one of the most profound turnarounds,” Brian Hale, founder and CEO at Mortgage Advisory Partners, said of upcoming market prospects. “Everybody (every lender) is going to have a black eye here. It’s not a lack of desire for loans, the loans don’t exist.”

As with all companies, businesses must adapt to the changing times. Rocket is really trying to redefine themselves as a fintech provider not just a mortgage company, said Heal, of Argus Research. 

“It’s yet to be seen if that strategy has yet to work out,” he said. 

That is not to say that Rocket doesn’t have advanced technology, Bhattachary added. “They have a lot of investment going on and a lot of innovation going on in its customer acquisition channel.

“The trick,” she said, “is to stay around and be around when the market changes and the cycle turns around. Then we’ll see who is in a better position and why.”

Read More

Continue Reading

Uncategorized

February Employment Situation

By Paul Gomme and Peter Rupert The establishment data from the BLS showed a 275,000 increase in payroll employment for February, outpacing the 230,000…

Published

on

By Paul Gomme and Peter Rupert

The establishment data from the BLS showed a 275,000 increase in payroll employment for February, outpacing the 230,000 average over the previous 12 months. The payroll data for January and December were revised down by a total of 167,000. The private sector added 223,000 new jobs, the largest gain since May of last year.

Temporary help services employment continues a steep decline after a sharp post-pandemic rise.

Average hours of work increased from 34.2 to 34.3. The increase, along with the 223,000 private employment increase led to a hefty increase in total hours of 5.6% at an annualized rate, also the largest increase since May of last year.

The establishment report, once again, beat “expectations;” the WSJ survey of economists was 198,000. Other than the downward revisions, mentioned above, another bit of negative news was a smallish increase in wage growth, from $34.52 to $34.57.

The household survey shows that the labor force increased 150,000, a drop in employment of 184,000 and an increase in the number of unemployed persons of 334,000. The labor force participation rate held steady at 62.5, the employment to population ratio decreased from 60.2 to 60.1 and the unemployment rate increased from 3.66 to 3.86. Remember that the unemployment rate is the number of unemployed relative to the labor force (the number employed plus the number unemployed). Consequently, the unemployment rate can go up if the number of unemployed rises holding fixed the labor force, or if the labor force shrinks holding the number unemployed unchanged. An increase in the unemployment rate is not necessarily a bad thing: it may reflect a strong labor market drawing “marginally attached” individuals from outside the labor force. Indeed, there was a 96,000 decline in those workers.

Earlier in the week, the BLS announced JOLTS (Job Openings and Labor Turnover Survey) data for January. There isn’t much to report here as the job openings changed little at 8.9 million, the number of hires and total separations were little changed at 5.7 million and 5.3 million, respectively.

As has been the case for the last couple of years, the number of job openings remains higher than the number of unemployed persons.

Also earlier in the week the BLS announced that productivity increased 3.2% in the 4th quarter with output rising 3.5% and hours of work rising 0.3%.

The bottom line is that the labor market continues its surprisingly (to some) strong performance, once again proving stronger than many had expected. This strength makes it difficult to justify any interest rate cuts soon, particularly given the recent inflation spike.

Read More

Continue Reading

Uncategorized

Mortgage rates fall as labor market normalizes

Jobless claims show an expanding economy. We will only be in a recession once jobless claims exceed 323,000 on a four-week moving average.

Published

on

Everyone was waiting to see if this week’s jobs report would send mortgage rates higher, which is what happened last month. Instead, the 10-year yield had a muted response after the headline number beat estimates, but we have negative job revisions from previous months. The Federal Reserve’s fear of wage growth spiraling out of control hasn’t materialized for over two years now and the unemployment rate ticked up to 3.9%. For now, we can say the labor market isn’t tight anymore, but it’s also not breaking.

The key labor data line in this expansion is the weekly jobless claims report. Jobless claims show an expanding economy that has not lost jobs yet. We will only be in a recession once jobless claims exceed 323,000 on a four-week moving average.

From the Fed: In the week ended March 2, initial claims for unemployment insurance benefits were flat, at 217,000. The four-week moving average declined slightly by 750, to 212,250


Below is an explanation of how we got here with the labor market, which all started during COVID-19.

1. I wrote the COVID-19 recovery model on April 7, 2020, and retired it on Dec. 9, 2020. By that time, the upfront recovery phase was done, and I needed to model out when we would get the jobs lost back.

2. Early in the labor market recovery, when we saw weaker job reports, I doubled and tripled down on my assertion that job openings would get to 10 million in this recovery. Job openings rose as high as to 12 million and are currently over 9 million. Even with the massive miss on a job report in May 2021, I didn’t waver.

Currently, the jobs openings, quit percentage and hires data are below pre-COVID-19 levels, which means the labor market isn’t as tight as it once was, and this is why the employment cost index has been slowing data to move along the quits percentage.  

2-US_Job_Quits_Rate-1-2

3. I wrote that we should get back all the jobs lost to COVID-19 by September of 2022. At the time this would be a speedy labor market recovery, and it happened on schedule, too

Total employment data

4. This is the key one for right now: If COVID-19 hadn’t happened, we would have between 157 million and 159 million jobs today, which would have been in line with the job growth rate in February 2020. Today, we are at 157,808,000. This is important because job growth should be cooling down now. We are more in line with where the labor market should be when averaging 140K-165K monthly. So for now, the fact that we aren’t trending between 140K-165K means we still have a bit more recovery kick left before we get down to those levels. 




From BLS: Total nonfarm payroll employment rose by 275,000 in February, and the unemployment rate increased to 3.9 percent, the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics reported today. Job gains occurred in health care, in government, in food services and drinking places, in social assistance, and in transportation and warehousing.

Here are the jobs that were created and lost in the previous month:

IMG_5092

In this jobs report, the unemployment rate for education levels looks like this:

  • Less than a high school diploma: 6.1%
  • High school graduate and no college: 4.2%
  • Some college or associate degree: 3.1%
  • Bachelor’s degree or higher: 2.2%
IMG_5093_320f22

Today’s report has continued the trend of the labor data beating my expectations, only because I am looking for the jobs data to slow down to a level of 140K-165K, which hasn’t happened yet. I wouldn’t categorize the labor market as being tight anymore because of the quits ratio and the hires data in the job openings report. This also shows itself in the employment cost index as well. These are key data lines for the Fed and the reason we are going to see three rate cuts this year.

Read More

Continue Reading

Uncategorized

Inside The Most Ridiculous Jobs Report In History: Record 1.2 Million Immigrant Jobs Added In One Month

Inside The Most Ridiculous Jobs Report In History: Record 1.2 Million Immigrant Jobs Added In One Month

Last month we though that the January…

Published

on

Inside The Most Ridiculous Jobs Report In History: Record 1.2 Million Immigrant Jobs Added In One Month

Last month we though that the January jobs report was the "most ridiculous in recent history" but, boy, were we wrong because this morning the Biden department of goalseeked propaganda (aka BLS) published the February jobs report, and holy crap was that something else. Even Goebbels would blush. 

What happened? Let's take a closer look.

On the surface, it was (almost) another blockbuster jobs report, certainly one which nobody expected, or rather just one bank out of 76 expected. Starting at the top, the BLS reported that in February the US unexpectedly added 275K jobs, with just one research analyst (from Dai-Ichi Research) expecting a higher number.

Some context: after last month's record 4-sigma beat, today's print was "only" 3 sigma higher than estimates. Needless to say, two multiple sigma beats in a row used to only happen in the USSR... and now in the US, apparently.

Before we go any further, a quick note on what last month we said was "the most ridiculous jobs report in recent history": it appears the BLS read our comments and decided to stop beclowing itself. It did that by slashing last month's ridiculous print by over a third, and revising what was originally reported as a massive 353K beat to just 229K,  a 124K revision, which was the biggest one-month negative revision in two years!

Of course, that does not mean that this month's jobs print won't be revised lower: it will be, and not just that month but every other month until the November election because that's the only tool left in the Biden admin's box: pretend the economic and jobs are strong, then revise them sharply lower the next month, something we pointed out first last summer and which has not failed to disappoint once.

To be fair, not every aspect of the jobs report was stellar (after all, the BLS had to give it some vague credibility). Take the unemployment rate, after flatlining between 3.4% and 3.8% for two years - and thus denying expectations from Sahm's Rule that a recession may have already started - in February the unemployment rate unexpectedly jumped to 3.9%, the highest since February 2022 (with Black unemployment spiking by 0.3% to 5.6%, an indicator which the Biden admin will quickly slam as widespread economic racism or something).

And then there were average hourly earnings, which after surging 0.6% MoM in January (since revised to 0.5%) and spooking markets that wage growth is so hot, the Fed will have no choice but to delay cuts, in February the number tumbled to just 0.1%, the lowest in two years...

... for one simple reason: last month's average wage surge had nothing to do with actual wages, and everything to do with the BLS estimate of hours worked (which is the denominator in the average wage calculation) which last month tumbled to just 34.1 (we were led to believe) the lowest since the covid pandemic...

... but has since been revised higher while the February print rose even more, to 34.3, hence why the latest average wage data was once again a product not of wages going up, but of how long Americans worked in any weekly period, in this case higher from 34.1 to 34.3, an increase which has a major impact on the average calculation.

While the above data points were examples of some latent weakness in the latest report, perhaps meant to give it a sheen of veracity, it was everything else in the report that was a problem starting with the BLS's latest choice of seasonal adjustments (after last month's wholesale revision), which have gone from merely laughable to full clownshow, as the following comparison between the monthly change in BLS and ADP payrolls shows. The trend is clear: the Biden admin numbers are now clearly rising even as the impartial ADP (which directly logs employment numbers at the company level and is far more accurate), shows an accelerating slowdown.

But it's more than just the Biden admin hanging its "success" on seasonal adjustments: when one digs deeper inside the jobs report, all sorts of ugly things emerge... such as the growing unprecedented divergence between the Establishment (payrolls) survey and much more accurate Household (actual employment) survey. To wit, while in January the BLS claims 275K payrolls were added, the Household survey found that the number of actually employed workers dropped for the third straight month (and 4 in the past 5), this time by 184K (from 161.152K to 160.968K).

This means that while the Payrolls series hits new all time highs every month since December 2020 (when according to the BLS the US had its last month of payrolls losses), the level of Employment has not budged in the past year. Worse, as shown in the chart below, such a gaping divergence has opened between the two series in the past 4 years, that the number of Employed workers would need to soar by 9 million (!) to catch up to what Payrolls claims is the employment situation.

There's more: shifting from a quantitative to a qualitative assessment, reveals just how ugly the composition of "new jobs" has been. Consider this: the BLS reports that in February 2024, the US had 132.9 million full-time jobs and 27.9 million part-time jobs. Well, that's great... until you look back one year and find that in February 2023 the US had 133.2 million full-time jobs, or more than it does one year later! And yes, all the job growth since then has been in part-time jobs, which have increased by 921K since February 2023 (from 27.020 million to 27.941 million).

Here is a summary of the labor composition in the past year: all the new jobs have been part-time jobs!

But wait there's even more, because now that the primary season is over and we enter the heart of election season and political talking points will be thrown around left and right, especially in the context of the immigration crisis created intentionally by the Biden administration which is hoping to import millions of new Democratic voters (maybe the US can hold the presidential election in Honduras or Guatemala, after all it is their citizens that will be illegally casting the key votes in November), what we find is that in February, the number of native-born workers tumbled again, sliding by a massive 560K to just 129.807 million. Add to this the December data, and we get a near-record 2.4 million plunge in native-born workers in just the past 3 months (only the covid crash was worse)!

The offset? A record 1.2 million foreign-born (read immigrants, both legal and illegal but mostly illegal) workers added in February!

Said otherwise, not only has all job creation in the past 6 years has been exclusively for foreign-born workers...

Source: St Louis Fed FRED Native Born and Foreign Born

... but there has been zero job-creation for native born workers since June 2018!

This is a huge issue - especially at a time of an illegal alien flood at the southwest border...

... and is about to become a huge political scandal, because once the inevitable recession finally hits, there will be millions of furious unemployed Americans demanding a more accurate explanation for what happened - i.e., the illegal immigration floodgates that were opened by the Biden admin.

Which is also why Biden's handlers will do everything in their power to insure there is no official recession before November... and why after the election is over, all economic hell will finally break loose. Until then, however, expect the jobs numbers to get even more ridiculous.

Tyler Durden Fri, 03/08/2024 - 13:30

Read More

Continue Reading

Trending