Connect with us

Government

December 2023 Monthly

As the
year winds down, the global economy appears to be entering a new phase. While
North American and European central bankers swear that they are prepared…

Published

on

As the year winds down, the global economy appears to be entering a new phase. While North American and European central bankers swear that they are prepared to respond to new threats to price stability, the markets demur. 

Indicative pricing in the derivatives markets reflects the general conclusion that the central banks have most likely completed the post-Covid monetary tightening cycle. Central bankers are pushing against a premature easing of financial conditions. 

Last year's sporadically large jumps in monthly CPI measures have dropped out of the 12-month comparisons. Still, inflation remains above targets but has slowed considerably. Japan remains the notable exception. 

The Bank of Japan continues to inch its way toward the exit of its extraordinary monetary policy. Previously, many expected that the BOJ could lift its overnight target rate out of negative territory where it has been since 2016 by the end of this year, but now it is seen to be more likely toward the end of the current fiscal year in March 2024, or maybe April. The BOJ has quietly stopped buying REITs and bought the least equity ETFs since 2010.

The dramatic divergence that saw the US economy expand by a sizzling 5.2% at an annualized pace and the eurozone and Japanese economies contract in Q3, has peaked. The Europe and Japan's economies remain lackluster at best. A new convergence is emerging, driven from the US side of the equation. American economic activity appears to be slowing sharply in Q4. It should be a broad slowdown, including a US consumption and government spending. Business investment may stagnate. The eurozone and UK may be considered fortunate if they can avoid a contraction in Q4.

Every business cycle has unique features, this is especially true of the current cycle. After the Great Financial Crisis and the European sovereign debt crisis subsided, the most likely scenario seemed like a return to the Great Moderation of slow growth, low inflation, and low interest rates. Before Covid struck, Europe and Japan had yet to normalize monetary policy. While the US had more success in normalizing monetary policy, fiscal policy was a different story. In the two years before the pandemic, despite above-trend growth (an average of about 4.5% per year) and the lowest unemployment in a generation, the US recorded large budget deficits (3.8% of GDP in 2018 and 4.6% in 2019). 

The once-in-a-generation (hopefully) pandemic was met with dramatic policy responses, unevenly applied, and then unevenly unwound. The reaction to Russia's invasion of Ukraine was on a completely different order of magnitude from the response to Moscow's 2008 invasion of Georgia, its 2014 invasion of Ukraine, and the later annexation of Crimea. The resulting shock altered the competitive landscape, and even now the cost of liquified natural gas is around 3.5x higher in Europe than in the US. 

An integral part of the economic landscape is the elevated tension in China. The fact that the US stance toward China, including the persistence and extension of tariffs, and export controls, reflects at least one general agreement amid great partisanship. Europe has also escalated its efforts to check Chinese imports, and new measures may be taken shortly. For its part, China has imposed new requirements on exporting several materials used to fabricate semiconductor chips.

Meanwhile, China's trade surplus is running slightly below last year's levels through October ($680.4 bln vs. $703.1 bln in the year ago period) but in yuan terms it is a little larger (CNY4.79 trillion vs. CNY 4.64 trillion). While exports have averaged a 5% drop year-over-year this year in dollar terms, exports have edged higher (average of almost 1.2% year-over-year) in yuan terms. Imports have fallen by an average of 6.1% from year ago levels in dollar terms but in yuan terms have eased by only an average of 0.12% from a year ago.

The US expansion has proven more resilient than imagined. Last December, the median forecast among Fed officials was that the economy would grow by 0.5% this year. The median forecast has steadily increased and stood at 2.1% in September, which would still allow for very weak Q4 growth. There are several economic indicators, including the pace of decline of the six-month average of the index of leading economic indicators, the contraction of M2, and rate of business failures that have been associated with past US recessions. Although the market was critical that the Fed did not stop its asset purchases earlier and was slower than several other high-income central bank to lift rates, on several occasions it has looked for rate cuts to be delivered sooner and more aggressively than the Fed has signaled. 

The growing conviction that US rates peaked seemed to help take pressure off risk assets. The MSCI Asia Pacific Index, Europe's Stoxx 600, and the US S&P 500 and Nasdaq snapped three-month declines last month. The S&P 500 rallied nearly 9%, its second-best November since 1980. The MSCI Emerging Market equity index rose almost 8% and recouped the losses of the past two months in full plus some. The JP Morgan Emerging Bond Index spread over US Treasuries narrowed to approach the low for the year set in July near 335 bp (the five- and 10-year averages are around 370 bp). Indices of emerging market currencies appreciated by about 2.0%-2.8%

Bannockburn's World Currency Index, a GDP-weighted basket representing the 12 largest economies, rose by about 1.5% in November, which is the first increase since July and its best performance since January. It reflects the broadly weaker dollar amid growing conviction that both policy rates and long-term yields have peaked as economy and price pressures slow. India was the only currency in the index not to rise against the US dollar and it was practically flat. The Mexican peso was the stronger performer in the basket with a 4.9% gain, helped by a resilient economy, a strong external sector, and a central bank that has held off cutting rates despite the slide in inflation and the rate cuts among several of its neighbors. The Australian dollar's 4.6% was a close second. It was helped by the rate hike, hawkish rhetoric, and the risk-on mood.   

 

U.S. Dollar: There are two key questions for businesses and investors: What is the magnitude and extent of the slowdown in the US economy and when will the Federal Reserve respond? The US economy grew by 5.2% in Q3 but appears to be slowing markedly in Q4. Economists look activity to be at least halved in Q4 and slow further in Q1 24 to 0.4%. In fact, the median forecast in Bloomberg's monthly survey does not see growth returning to 1.5% until Q4 24. The FOMC's last meeting of the year concludes on December 13. It is widely expected to standpat with the upper band of its target at 5.50%, where it has been since July. The futures market has fully discounted two cuts by the end of H1 24. for the early May meeting and about 3.5 cuts by the end Q3 24. The Federal Reserve will update its Summary of Economic Projections. In September, the median projection anticipated two rate cuts in 2024, even though its PCE deflator forecast is for above target 2.5%. The median forecast also saw growth slowing to 1.5% in 2024. Meanwhile, the 800 lb. gorilla in the room, whose presence is going to be increasing felt in the 2024, is the presidential election, where Trump is polling a few percentage points ahead of Biden. The uncertain policy outlook will likely limit scope for new international agreements and may dampen investment. The Dollar Index's rally from mid-July through early October ended and meeting an important technical retracement objective of its rally since mid-July. While we think the cyclical high was recorded in September 2023 (~114.75), we suspect November's 3% decline was a bit too much. A bounce could lift it back to the 104.70-105.00 before it falls out of a favor again.

 

Euro:  The eurozone continues to struggle. The economy has practically stagnated this year and growth impulses seem poor as the year winds down. The sharp decline in price pressures gives policymakers room to maneuver. The preliminary CPI in November stood at 2.4%, down from 10% last November, and lowest since July 2021. The swaps market has around an 80% chance that the first cut is delivered in Q1 24, though bank officials seem to suggest mid-year may be more appropriate. By the end of H1 24, the market has two-and-a-half cuts discounted. There is even greater uncertainty about the outlook for fiscal policy. An agreement is needed about modifications in the Stability and Growth Pact, or the old rules will come into force at starting next year. At the same time, Germany's high court ruled that efforts to shift off-budget Covid spending to climate change was unconstitutional, which blew an immediate hole (~37 bln euros) into this year's budget, raised questions about other off-budget programs, and is spurring increased strains in the coalition government. There seems to be little choice but to suspend the debt-brake for another year. The euro recorded the year's high in mid-July near $1.1275 and recorded the year's low in early October around $1.0450. Last month, it surpassed $1.0965 to meet a key technical retracement of its losses and traded above $1.10, but the pullback, encouraged by the soft CPI report, has already begun. We suspect it retraces toward $1.0725-50.

(As of December 1, indicative closing prices, previous in parentheses)

Spot: $1.0885 ($1.0565) Median Bloomberg One-month forecast: $1.0860 ($1.0650) One-month forward: $1.0900 ($1.0585)   One-month implied vol: 6.5% (6.7%) 


Japanese Yen: Japan's economy contracted by a larger-than-expected 2.1% at an annualized pace in Q3. Consumer spending and business investment declined for the second consecutive quarter. Arguably, with the help of a JPY13.2 trillion (~$87 bln) extra budget, which includes income tax rebates and funds for lower income households, the economy will likely return to modest growth in Q4 23. The Bank of Japan meeting concludes on December 19. Earlier speculation of an exit from the negative policy rate has been pushed out to March or April. Still, the BOJ is gradually normalizing policy. It has not purchased any Japanese real estate investment trusts (J-REITs) this year and has bought the least amount of equity ETFs since 2010. Yet, while the other major central banks have seen their balance sheets shrink, the BOJ's balance sheet rose to about 132% of GDP from around 126.5% at the end of 2022. Headline CPI peaked in January at 4.3% and has steadied around 3.2%-3.3% in recent months. The core rate, which excludes fresh food was at 2.9% in October, down from 4.2% at the start of the year. The Bank of Japan's forecasts it to be at 2.8% in the next fiscal year before falling to 1.7% in FY25. Of course, embedded in the forecast is BOJ's policy. The latest Bloomberg monthly survey found a median forecast of core CPI for FY24 at 2.2% and 1.6% in FY25. The dollar peaked near JPY151.90 in mid-October to approach but not take out the high from October 2022. A combination of valuation, which OECD's model of purchasing power parity, estimates is more than 50% under-valued against the US dollar, and ideas that the BOJ will exit is extraordinary monetary policy may help underpin the yen as US rates ease. Anecdotal reports already suggest some investors and asset managers have already begun buying the yen and/or Japanese assets. Still, in late November, speculators in the futures market had their largest net short yen position since late 2017. It increased by almost 30% in November, warning that they may be in weak hands, and vulnerable to short squeeze. The move appears to have already begun, but if the market has gotten ahead of itself on US rate expectations, there may be scope for the dollar to return toward JPY150 before the downtrend resumes. 

Spot: JPY146.80 (JPY149.65) Median Bloomberg One-month forecast: JPY146.30 (JPY147.20) One-month forward: JPY146.15 (JPY148.90) One-month implied vol: 8.8% (8.1%) 

 

British Pound: The UK economy did not contract as economists expected in Q3, but the stagnation masked a 0.4% decline in consumption, the most since Q3 22 and a whopping 2.0% decline in business investment, the most since Q1 21. Economists in Bloomberg's survey expect the British economy not to grow until Q2 24. The Bank of England's latest forecast see the economy stagnant next year, which is more pessimistic than the European Commission (0.5%), the IMF (0.6%), and the median forecast in Bloomberg's survey (0.4%). However, a small upgrade is possible after the government's Autumn statement, which eased fiscal policy by about GBP18 bln. It included a cut in the rate of national insurance by two percentage points and made permanent the full expensing of capital investment. The reduction of the national insurance tax is worth about GBP450 a year to the average wage earner. On the other hand, personal allowances will remain frozen for the next five years, which will lead to bracket creep (inflation pushing wage earners into higher tax brackets. Consumer price inflation has slowed from 10.5% at the end of 2023 to 4.6% in October. If UK consumer prices rise at the same pace for the next six months as they have for the past six months, headline inflation can be below 3% early spring 2024. The swaps market has a little more than an 80% chance that the first rate cut is delivered by the end of H1 24. In November, sterling extended its recovery to about seven cents off the October 4 low near $1.2035. It met an important technical retracement objective at $1.2720. The $1.2800 area offers the next chart resistance. Sterling's 3.8% rally in November, the largest since November 2022, has stretched momentum indicators. Downside risk may extend toward $1.2450-$1.2500. 

Spot: $1.2710 ($1.2120) Median Bloomberg One-month forecast: $1.2600 ($1.2215) One-month forward:  $1.2715 ($1.2125) One-month implied vol: 7.1% (7.5%) 

 

Canadian Dollar:  The Canadian economy contracted by 1.1% at an annualized rate in Q3, the worst performance among the G7 and is in stark contrast with the heady 5.2% pace the US reported. Inventories and exports were drags, while consumption was flat in Q3. We suspect this overstates the weakness of the Canadian economy. The nearly 60k increase in full-time jobs in November, more than the total of the prior four months lends credence to our suspicions. Previously, the central bank was concerned about excess demand, but this seems to have been satiated. This may also help ensure that inflation remains on a downward trajectory. Just as the Bank of Canada was among the first of the high-income countries to raise rates (March 2022), it is seen to be among the first to cut rates. The swaps market is pricing in almost a 70% chance that the first cut is delivered in late Q1 24 and has three cuts and a little more fully discounted by the end of Q3 24. The Bank of Canada's last meeting of this year is on December 6, and while it will not do anything, it could modify its forward guidance. But the resilience of the labor market argues against expecting a validation of interest rate expectations. The US dollar recorded the year's high against the Canadian dollar on November 1 near CAD1.3900 and then trended lower for the rest of the month. The Canadian dollar's 2.25% gain snapped a three-month drop.  The US dollar slipped through CAD1.35 on December 1 amid a broad sell-off and after strong jobs growth reported. The next technical target is the CAD1.3380-CAD!.3400 area.  However, the momentum indicators are stretched, and risk extends back to the CAD1.3600 area.

Spot: CAD1.3500 (CAD 1.3870) Median Bloomberg One-month forecast: CAD1.3500 (CAD1.3675) One-month forward: CAD1.3490 (CAD1.3865) One-month implied vol: 5.6% (5.7%) 

 

Australian Dollar:  The Reserve Bank of Australia delivered a quarter-point hike last month, lifting the target rate to 4.35%. Governor Bullock warned that higher rates may be needed. The market initially seemed to react according on interest rates and the Australian dollar. However, data disappointed. The labor market is cooling. Australia created an average of 16k full-time jobs a month this year. The average was three-times higher a year ago. Retail sales unexpectedly fell in October (-0.2%) for the first time since June. Inflation slowed more than expected in October and at 4.9% (from 5.6%), it matches the low for the year set in July. After the November hike, there was never really a strong chance of a follow-up hike this month, but the market now sees little chance of another hike in the cycle. The probability of a hike in H1 24 has fallen to around 20% from closer to 75% after Bullock's comments in late November. The Australian dollar had carved a double top around $0.6900 in June/July, which projected to $0.6300. The Aussie overshot it and recorded a low in late October near $0.6270. It recovered to reached $0.6675 in late November-meeting an important technical retracement of the sell-off from the July high. While there may be scope for a new high, we expect it to be marginal before a setback toward $0.6500.

Spot: $0.6675 ($0.6335) Median Bloomberg One-month forecast: $0.6655 ($0.6420) One-month forward $0.6685 ($0.6340)    One-month implied vol 9.0% (9.9%) 

 

Mexican Peso:  The Mexican economy is slowing, but it remains more resilient than several of its neighbors who have already begun cutting rates. The strong worker remittances more than cover the trade deficit, which is on pace to fall to about a third of last year's shortfall. The carry remains attractive, but it is an old story, and encouraged by some official comments, the market bringing forward Banxico’ s first rate cut into Q1 24 from Q2 24. Indeed, over the next 12 months, the swaps market is pricing in about 180 bp of cuts in Mexico and 115 bp in the US. The dollar approached MXN17.00 (~MXN17.0350) in late November, essentially meeting the objective of a double top formed in October. The market seems reluctant to push it further. It has come down from almost MXN18.50 in October, and the funding leg of the carry trades, besides dollars, like yen, or Swiss franc, or the offshore yuan, strengthened. This generated some positioning pressure on the peso. The dollar recovered to MXN17.50 at the end of November. That may not have exhausted the corrective potential, and the risk may extend toward MXN17.70-80.

Spot: MXN17.1950 (MXN18.11) Median Bloomberg One-Month forecast MXN17.3875 (MXN17.95) One-month forward MXN17.28 (MXN18.22) One-month implied vol 11.9% (13.9%)

 

Chinese Yuan: Officials have announced a series of measures to support the economy and the property sector. While interest rates have been left unchanged, the PBOC has made sizeable injections of liquidity. The central government will boost its deficit by CNY1 trillion and is considering launching another CNY1 trillion fund to support public housing and urban renewal. The PBOC launched a facility to help relieve the debt stress of some local governments. There have been several high-level meetings in recent weeks, culminating a meeting between President Biden and Xi last month. Xi seemed to have gone on a charm offensive with Mastercard getting its long-awaited permission to enter a local JV, possible orders for Boeing's Max 37 airplanes, new soy purchase orders, and after repeated denials it can do anything about the fentanyl trade, more efforts were promised. That said, reports suggest that China's aerial harassment of Taiwan continued, and the risk is that it may intensify ahead of Taipei's election in mid-January. Meanwhile, China's low interest rates and the low volatility of the offshore yuan makes the Chinese currency a candidate for funding (borrowed cheaply and sold for the purchase of a higher yielding or more volatile asset). Another way this is expressed is the marked increase in foreign entities issuing bonds on the mainland ("panda bonds"). The issuance this year is a record through mid-October (73 issues for ~CNY126.5 bln, or ~$17.7 bln, a 60%+ increase year-over-year). Beijing has also lifted the restrictions on the outward transfer for funds raised in such offerings. This is also another, though less appreciated, dimension of the internationalization of the yuan. With the long Chinese holiday in October, heighted efforts by the PBOC to stabilize the yuan, and the elevated threat of BOJ intervention, the yuan decoupled from the yen, and the 30-day rolling correlation was near zero at the end of October, it has recovered to slightly above 0.60 by late November. The year's high was 0.70. The yuan's correlation with the euro rose from around 0.20 at the end of October to almost 0.60 at the end of November.

Spot: CNY7.1285 

(CNY7.3175) Median Bloomberg One-month forecast CNY7.1480 (CNY7.2820) One-month forward CNY7.0815 (CNY7.2020) One-month implied vol 4.6% (5.1%) 

 


Disclaimer


Read More

Continue Reading

Government

Veterans Affairs Kept COVID-19 Vaccine Mandate In Place Without Evidence

Veterans Affairs Kept COVID-19 Vaccine Mandate In Place Without Evidence

Authored by Zachary Stieber via The Epoch Times (emphasis ours),

The…

Published

on

Veterans Affairs Kept COVID-19 Vaccine Mandate In Place Without Evidence

Authored by Zachary Stieber via The Epoch Times (emphasis ours),

The U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) reviewed no data when deciding in 2023 to keep its COVID-19 vaccine mandate in place.

Doses of a COVID-19 vaccine in Washington in a file image. (Jacquelyn Martin/Pool/AFP via Getty Images)

VA Secretary Denis McDonough said on May 1, 2023, that the end of many other federal mandates “will not impact current policies at the Department of Veterans Affairs.”

He said the mandate was remaining for VA health care personnel “to ensure the safety of veterans and our colleagues.”

Mr. McDonough did not cite any studies or other data. A VA spokesperson declined to provide any data that was reviewed when deciding not to rescind the mandate. The Epoch Times submitted a Freedom of Information Act for “all documents outlining which data was relied upon when establishing the mandate when deciding to keep the mandate in place.”

The agency searched for such data and did not find any.

The VA does not even attempt to justify its policies with science, because it can’t,” Leslie Manookian, president and founder of the Health Freedom Defense Fund, told The Epoch Times.

“The VA just trusts that the process and cost of challenging its unfounded policies is so onerous, most people are dissuaded from even trying,” she added.

The VA’s mandate remains in place to this day.

The VA’s website claims that vaccines “help protect you from getting severe illness” and “offer good protection against most COVID-19 variants,” pointing in part to observational data from the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) that estimate the vaccines provide poor protection against symptomatic infection and transient shielding against hospitalization.

There have also been increasing concerns among outside scientists about confirmed side effects like heart inflammation—the VA hid a safety signal it detected for the inflammation—and possible side effects such as tinnitus, which shift the benefit-risk calculus.

President Joe Biden imposed a slate of COVID-19 vaccine mandates in 2021. The VA was the first federal agency to implement a mandate.

President Biden rescinded the mandates in May 2023, citing a drop in COVID-19 cases and hospitalizations. His administration maintains the choice to require vaccines was the right one and saved lives.

“Our administration’s vaccination requirements helped ensure the safety of workers in critical workforces including those in the healthcare and education sectors, protecting themselves and the populations they serve, and strengthening their ability to provide services without disruptions to operations,” the White House said.

Some experts said requiring vaccination meant many younger people were forced to get a vaccine despite the risks potentially outweighing the benefits, leaving fewer doses for older adults.

By mandating the vaccines to younger people and those with natural immunity from having had COVID, older people in the U.S. and other countries did not have access to them, and many people might have died because of that,” Martin Kulldorff, a professor of medicine on leave from Harvard Medical School, told The Epoch Times previously.

The VA was one of just a handful of agencies to keep its mandate in place following the removal of many federal mandates.

“At this time, the vaccine requirement will remain in effect for VA health care personnel, including VA psychologists, pharmacists, social workers, nursing assistants, physical therapists, respiratory therapists, peer specialists, medical support assistants, engineers, housekeepers, and other clinical, administrative, and infrastructure support employees,” Mr. McDonough wrote to VA employees at the time.

This also includes VA volunteers and contractors. Effectively, this means that any Veterans Health Administration (VHA) employee, volunteer, or contractor who works in VHA facilities, visits VHA facilities, or provides direct care to those we serve will still be subject to the vaccine requirement at this time,” he said. “We continue to monitor and discuss this requirement, and we will provide more information about the vaccination requirements for VA health care employees soon. As always, we will process requests for vaccination exceptions in accordance with applicable laws, regulations, and policies.”

The version of the shots cleared in the fall of 2022, and available through the fall of 2023, did not have any clinical trial data supporting them.

A new version was approved in the fall of 2023 because there were indications that the shots not only offered temporary protection but also that the level of protection was lower than what was observed during earlier stages of the pandemic.

Ms. Manookian, whose group has challenged several of the federal mandates, said that the mandate “illustrates the dangers of the administrative state and how these federal agencies have become a law unto themselves.”

Tyler Durden Sat, 03/09/2024 - 22:10

Read More

Continue Reading

Government

Are Voters Recoiling Against Disorder?

Are Voters Recoiling Against Disorder?

Authored by Michael Barone via The Epoch Times (emphasis ours),

The headlines coming out of the Super…

Published

on

Are Voters Recoiling Against Disorder?

Authored by Michael Barone via The Epoch Times (emphasis ours),

The headlines coming out of the Super Tuesday primaries have got it right. Barring cataclysmic changes, Donald Trump and Joe Biden will be the Republican and Democratic nominees for president in 2024.

(Left) President Joe Biden delivers remarks on canceling student debt at Culver City Julian Dixon Library in Culver City, Calif., on Feb. 21, 2024. (Right) Republican presidential candidate and former U.S. President Donald Trump stands on stage during a campaign event at Big League Dreams Las Vegas in Las Vegas, Nev., on Jan. 27, 2024. (Mario Tama/Getty Images; David Becker/Getty Images)

With Nikki Haley’s withdrawal, there will be no more significantly contested primaries or caucuses—the earliest both parties’ races have been over since something like the current primary-dominated system was put in place in 1972.

The primary results have spotlighted some of both nominees’ weaknesses.

Donald Trump lost high-income, high-educated constituencies, including the entire metro area—aka the Swamp. Many but by no means all Haley votes there were cast by Biden Democrats. Mr. Trump can’t afford to lose too many of the others in target states like Pennsylvania and Michigan.

Majorities and large minorities of voters in overwhelmingly Latino counties in Texas’s Rio Grande Valley and some in Houston voted against Joe Biden, and even more against Senate nominee Rep. Colin Allred (D-Texas).

Returns from Hispanic precincts in New Hampshire and Massachusetts show the same thing. Mr. Biden can’t afford to lose too many Latino votes in target states like Arizona and Georgia.

When Mr. Trump rode down that escalator in 2015, commentators assumed he’d repel Latinos. Instead, Latino voters nationally, and especially the closest eyewitnesses of Biden’s open-border policy, have been trending heavily Republican.

High-income liberal Democrats may sport lawn signs proclaiming, “In this house, we believe ... no human is illegal.” The logical consequence of that belief is an open border. But modest-income folks in border counties know that flows of illegal immigrants result in disorder, disease, and crime.

There is plenty of impatience with increased disorder in election returns below the presidential level. Consider Los Angeles County, America’s largest county, with nearly 10 million people, more people than 40 of the 50 states. It voted 71 percent for Mr. Biden in 2020.

Current returns show county District Attorney George Gascon winning only 21 percent of the vote in the nonpartisan primary. He’ll apparently face Republican Nathan Hochman, a critic of his liberal policies, in November.

Gascon, elected after the May 2020 death of counterfeit-passing suspect George Floyd in Minneapolis, is one of many county prosecutors supported by billionaire George Soros. His policies include not charging juveniles as adults, not seeking higher penalties for gang membership or use of firearms, and bringing fewer misdemeanor cases.

The predictable result has been increased car thefts, burglaries, and personal robberies. Some 120 assistant district attorneys have left the office, and there’s a backlog of 10,000 unprosecuted cases.

More than a dozen other Soros-backed and similarly liberal prosecutors have faced strong opposition or have left office.

St. Louis prosecutor Kim Gardner resigned last May amid lawsuits seeking her removal, Milwaukee’s John Chisholm retired in January, and Baltimore’s Marilyn Mosby was defeated in July 2022 and convicted of perjury in September 2023. Last November, Loudoun County, Virginia, voters (62 percent Biden) ousted liberal Buta Biberaj, who declined to prosecute a transgender student for assault, and in June 2022 voters in San Francisco (85 percent Biden) recalled famed radical Chesa Boudin.

Similarly, this Tuesday, voters in San Francisco passed ballot measures strengthening police powers and requiring treatment of drug-addicted welfare recipients.

In retrospect, it appears the Floyd video, appearing after three months of COVID-19 confinement, sparked a frenzied, even crazed reaction, especially among the highly educated and articulate. One fatal incident was seen as proof that America’s “systemic racism” was worse than ever and that police forces should be defunded and perhaps abolished.

2020 was “the year America went crazy,” I wrote in January 2021, a year in which police funding was actually cut by Democrats in New York, Los Angeles, San Francisco, Seattle, and Denver. A year in which young New York Times (NYT) staffers claimed they were endangered by the publication of Sen. Tom Cotton’s (R-Ark.) opinion article advocating calling in military forces if necessary to stop rioting, as had been done in Detroit in 1967 and Los Angeles in 1992. A craven NYT publisher even fired the editorial page editor for running the article.

Evidence of visible and tangible discontent with increasing violence and its consequences—barren and locked shelves in Manhattan chain drugstores, skyrocketing carjackings in Washington, D.C.—is as unmistakable in polls and election results as it is in daily life in large metropolitan areas. Maybe 2024 will turn out to be the year even liberal America stopped acting crazy.

Chaos and disorder work against incumbents, as they did in 1968 when Democrats saw their party’s popular vote fall from 61 percent to 43 percent.

Views expressed in this article are opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of The Epoch Times or ZeroHedge.

Tyler Durden Sat, 03/09/2024 - 23:20

Read More

Continue Reading

Government

Low Iron Levels In Blood Could Trigger Long COVID: Study

Low Iron Levels In Blood Could Trigger Long COVID: Study

Authored by Amie Dahnke via The Epoch Times (emphasis ours),

People with inadequate…

Published

on

Low Iron Levels In Blood Could Trigger Long COVID: Study

Authored by Amie Dahnke via The Epoch Times (emphasis ours),

People with inadequate iron levels in their blood due to a COVID-19 infection could be at greater risk of long COVID.

(Shutterstock)

A new study indicates that problems with iron levels in the bloodstream likely trigger chronic inflammation and other conditions associated with the post-COVID phenomenon. The findings, published on March 1 in Nature Immunology, could offer new ways to treat or prevent the condition.

Long COVID Patients Have Low Iron Levels

Researchers at the University of Cambridge pinpointed low iron as a potential link to long-COVID symptoms thanks to a study they initiated shortly after the start of the pandemic. They recruited people who tested positive for the virus to provide blood samples for analysis over a year, which allowed the researchers to look for post-infection changes in the blood. The researchers looked at 214 samples and found that 45 percent of patients reported symptoms of long COVID that lasted between three and 10 months.

In analyzing the blood samples, the research team noticed that people experiencing long COVID had low iron levels, contributing to anemia and low red blood cell production, just two weeks after they were diagnosed with COVID-19. This was true for patients regardless of age, sex, or the initial severity of their infection.

According to one of the study co-authors, the removal of iron from the bloodstream is a natural process and defense mechanism of the body.

But it can jeopardize a person’s recovery.

When the body has an infection, it responds by removing iron from the bloodstream. This protects us from potentially lethal bacteria that capture the iron in the bloodstream and grow rapidly. It’s an evolutionary response that redistributes iron in the body, and the blood plasma becomes an iron desert,” University of Oxford professor Hal Drakesmith said in a press release. “However, if this goes on for a long time, there is less iron for red blood cells, so oxygen is transported less efficiently affecting metabolism and energy production, and for white blood cells, which need iron to work properly. The protective mechanism ends up becoming a problem.”

The research team believes that consistently low iron levels could explain why individuals with long COVID continue to experience fatigue and difficulty exercising. As such, the researchers suggested iron supplementation to help regulate and prevent the often debilitating symptoms associated with long COVID.

It isn’t necessarily the case that individuals don’t have enough iron in their body, it’s just that it’s trapped in the wrong place,” Aimee Hanson, a postdoctoral researcher at the University of Cambridge who worked on the study, said in the press release. “What we need is a way to remobilize the iron and pull it back into the bloodstream, where it becomes more useful to the red blood cells.”

The research team pointed out that iron supplementation isn’t always straightforward. Achieving the right level of iron varies from person to person. Too much iron can cause stomach issues, ranging from constipation, nausea, and abdominal pain to gastritis and gastric lesions.

1 in 5 Still Affected by Long COVID

COVID-19 has affected nearly 40 percent of Americans, with one in five of those still suffering from symptoms of long COVID, according to the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Long COVID is marked by health issues that continue at least four weeks after an individual was initially diagnosed with COVID-19. Symptoms can last for days, weeks, months, or years and may include fatigue, cough or chest pain, headache, brain fog, depression or anxiety, digestive issues, and joint or muscle pain.

Tyler Durden Sat, 03/09/2024 - 12:50

Read More

Continue Reading

Trending