Connect with us

Uncategorized

Are Small-Cap Penny Stocks Worth Buying or Not?

Are small cap penny stocks worth buying or not in 2023?
The post Are Small-Cap Penny Stocks Worth Buying or Not? appeared first on Penny Stocks to Buy,…

Published

on

3 Reasons to Buy Small-Cap Penny Stocks in 2023

Penny stocks, typically priced below $5 per share, have garnered attention from a wide range of investors due to their potential for significant returns. Trading penny stocks offers an avenue for those looking to enter the stock market without a hefty financial commitment. One of the main attractions of these stocks is the opportunity they present for substantial growth. Small-cap companies, which penny stocks often represent, can experience rapid expansion and development, leading to impressive stock price appreciation.

[Read More] Best Penny Stocks To Buy Now? 4 To Watch Before Labor Day

Technical analysis remains a favored strategy among those investing in penny stocks. By examining price patterns and market trends, investors can make predictions about future stock movements. Fundamental analysis, on the other hand, emphasizes the evaluation of a company’s financial health and growth prospects before making an investment decision.

Diversification is another cornerstone principle, suggesting that investors spread their capital across various penny stocks to balance potential risks and rewards. Staying updated with market news and specific company announcements can also provide an edge, offering insights that can guide buying or selling decisions. It’s essential to recognize the inherent volatility of penny stocks. While they can yield remarkable returns, a strategic and informed approach is crucial to navigate the challenges and capitalize on the opportunities they present.

3 Reasons for Buying Small-Cap Penny Stocks Right Now

  1. Potential for Substantial Growth
  2. Ability to Move Rapidly in Price
  3. Low Price Relative to Blue Chips

Potential for Substantial Growth

One of the most compelling reasons investors are drawn to small-cap penny stocks is their undeniable potential for substantial growth. Unlike their large-cap counterparts, which often have matured markets and slower growth trajectories, penny stocks represent companies at the cusp of their growth curve. This nascent stage in their business lifecycle means they have a vast untapped market to conquer, leading to exponential growth possibilities.

Many of today’s industry giants started as small-cap companies, only to evolve into market leaders over time. Investing in penny stocks offers the unique opportunity to be part of such transformative journeys from the ground up. As these companies innovate, expand, and solidify their market presence, their stock prices can reflect this upward trajectory, offering substantial returns to early investors.

Furthermore, the innovative nature of many penny stock companies, especially those in emerging sectors like green technology, biotech, or digital platforms, means they are often at the forefront of industry disruptions. Their agility and adaptability allow them to pivot quickly in response to market demands, capturing significant market share in the process. This dynamism, combined with their growth potential, makes penny stocks an attractive proposition for those looking to amplify their investment gains.

Ability to Move Rapidly in Price

One of the standout characteristics of small-cap penny stocks is their ability to experience swift price movements. This inherent trait can be attributed to their lower market capitalization and the often niche sectors they operate within. When positive news or favorable developments occur, the stock price of these companies can surge dramatically in a short span, offering investors the chance for significant returns on their investments.

[Read More] Can Penny Stocks Provide Passive Income?

This rapid price movement is also a reflection of the dynamic nature of the companies behind these stocks. Being smaller and more agile, they can quickly adapt to market changes, implement innovative strategies, or enter new markets, all of which can lead to heightened investor interest and, consequently, a rise in stock price. For instance, a penny stock company announcing a breakthrough product or securing a lucrative contract can see its stock price skyrocket overnight.

Moreover, the relatively lower price point of penny stocks means that investors can acquire a substantial number of shares with a modest investment. This allows for a greater percentage gain when the stock price moves favorably. For example, a mere $0.10 increase in a stock priced at $1 can translate to a 10% return, a movement that can happen rapidly in the vibrant world of penny stocks.

Low Price Relative to Blue Chips

One of the most distinguishing features of penny stocks is their low price, especially when compared to blue-chip stocks. This price difference isn’t just a matter of numbers; it represents a world of opportunities for investors of all kinds. While blue-chip stocks are often associated with established companies that have a long history of stability and performance, their higher price point can be a barrier for many investors, especially those just starting out or with limited capital.

On the other hand, penny stocks, with their affordable price tags, open the doors to the stock market for a broader audience. An investor can start building a diverse portfolio with a relatively modest amount of money, allowing them to dip their toes into the world of investing without committing substantial capital. This accessibility is one of the primary reasons why penny stocks are so popular among novice investors and those looking to experiment with different sectors and industries.

Additionally, the low price of penny stocks relative to blue chips offers a unique advantage in terms of potential percentage gains. A small absolute increase in the price of a penny stock can result in a significant percentage return. For instance, a stock priced at $0.50 that rises to $1 has effectively delivered a 100% return, a feat that would require a much larger absolute movement in a blue-chip stock.

3 Hot Small Cap Penny Stocks to Watch

  1. T2 Biosystems Inc. (NASDAQ: TTOO)
  2. Eos Energy Enterprises Inc. (NASDAQ: EOSE)
  3. Cano Health Inc. (NYSE: CANO)

Which Penny Stocks Are on Your Watchlist in 2023?

Penny stocks, often associated with small-cap companies, present a unique investment opportunity with the potential for significant gains. These stocks, priced attractively below $5 per share, allow investors to venture into the stock market without a large financial outlay. The allure of rapid growth and development in small-cap firms can lead to notable stock price increases. To maximize returns, many investors turn to technical analysis, leveraging price patterns and market trends to forecast stock trajectories.

[Read More] Penny Stocks, How To Buy Them, & Frequently Asked Questions

In contrast, fundamental analysis focuses on evaluating the financial robustness and future prospects of companies. Diversifying investments across multiple penny stocks is a recommended strategy to balance risks and rewards. Additionally, keeping a pulse on market dynamics and company-specific news can offer a competitive advantage in decision-making. Given the volatile nature of penny stocks, a combination of caution, strategy, and knowledge is essential for successful trading and investing.

The post Are Small-Cap Penny Stocks Worth Buying or Not? appeared first on Penny Stocks to Buy, Picks, News and Information | PennyStocks.com.

Read More

Continue Reading

Uncategorized

February Employment Situation

By Paul Gomme and Peter Rupert The establishment data from the BLS showed a 275,000 increase in payroll employment for February, outpacing the 230,000…

Published

on

By Paul Gomme and Peter Rupert

The establishment data from the BLS showed a 275,000 increase in payroll employment for February, outpacing the 230,000 average over the previous 12 months. The payroll data for January and December were revised down by a total of 167,000. The private sector added 223,000 new jobs, the largest gain since May of last year.

Temporary help services employment continues a steep decline after a sharp post-pandemic rise.

Average hours of work increased from 34.2 to 34.3. The increase, along with the 223,000 private employment increase led to a hefty increase in total hours of 5.6% at an annualized rate, also the largest increase since May of last year.

The establishment report, once again, beat “expectations;” the WSJ survey of economists was 198,000. Other than the downward revisions, mentioned above, another bit of negative news was a smallish increase in wage growth, from $34.52 to $34.57.

The household survey shows that the labor force increased 150,000, a drop in employment of 184,000 and an increase in the number of unemployed persons of 334,000. The labor force participation rate held steady at 62.5, the employment to population ratio decreased from 60.2 to 60.1 and the unemployment rate increased from 3.66 to 3.86. Remember that the unemployment rate is the number of unemployed relative to the labor force (the number employed plus the number unemployed). Consequently, the unemployment rate can go up if the number of unemployed rises holding fixed the labor force, or if the labor force shrinks holding the number unemployed unchanged. An increase in the unemployment rate is not necessarily a bad thing: it may reflect a strong labor market drawing “marginally attached” individuals from outside the labor force. Indeed, there was a 96,000 decline in those workers.

Earlier in the week, the BLS announced JOLTS (Job Openings and Labor Turnover Survey) data for January. There isn’t much to report here as the job openings changed little at 8.9 million, the number of hires and total separations were little changed at 5.7 million and 5.3 million, respectively.

As has been the case for the last couple of years, the number of job openings remains higher than the number of unemployed persons.

Also earlier in the week the BLS announced that productivity increased 3.2% in the 4th quarter with output rising 3.5% and hours of work rising 0.3%.

The bottom line is that the labor market continues its surprisingly (to some) strong performance, once again proving stronger than many had expected. This strength makes it difficult to justify any interest rate cuts soon, particularly given the recent inflation spike.

Read More

Continue Reading

Uncategorized

Mortgage rates fall as labor market normalizes

Jobless claims show an expanding economy. We will only be in a recession once jobless claims exceed 323,000 on a four-week moving average.

Published

on

Everyone was waiting to see if this week’s jobs report would send mortgage rates higher, which is what happened last month. Instead, the 10-year yield had a muted response after the headline number beat estimates, but we have negative job revisions from previous months. The Federal Reserve’s fear of wage growth spiraling out of control hasn’t materialized for over two years now and the unemployment rate ticked up to 3.9%. For now, we can say the labor market isn’t tight anymore, but it’s also not breaking.

The key labor data line in this expansion is the weekly jobless claims report. Jobless claims show an expanding economy that has not lost jobs yet. We will only be in a recession once jobless claims exceed 323,000 on a four-week moving average.

From the Fed: In the week ended March 2, initial claims for unemployment insurance benefits were flat, at 217,000. The four-week moving average declined slightly by 750, to 212,250


Below is an explanation of how we got here with the labor market, which all started during COVID-19.

1. I wrote the COVID-19 recovery model on April 7, 2020, and retired it on Dec. 9, 2020. By that time, the upfront recovery phase was done, and I needed to model out when we would get the jobs lost back.

2. Early in the labor market recovery, when we saw weaker job reports, I doubled and tripled down on my assertion that job openings would get to 10 million in this recovery. Job openings rose as high as to 12 million and are currently over 9 million. Even with the massive miss on a job report in May 2021, I didn’t waver.

Currently, the jobs openings, quit percentage and hires data are below pre-COVID-19 levels, which means the labor market isn’t as tight as it once was, and this is why the employment cost index has been slowing data to move along the quits percentage.  

2-US_Job_Quits_Rate-1-2

3. I wrote that we should get back all the jobs lost to COVID-19 by September of 2022. At the time this would be a speedy labor market recovery, and it happened on schedule, too

Total employment data

4. This is the key one for right now: If COVID-19 hadn’t happened, we would have between 157 million and 159 million jobs today, which would have been in line with the job growth rate in February 2020. Today, we are at 157,808,000. This is important because job growth should be cooling down now. We are more in line with where the labor market should be when averaging 140K-165K monthly. So for now, the fact that we aren’t trending between 140K-165K means we still have a bit more recovery kick left before we get down to those levels. 




From BLS: Total nonfarm payroll employment rose by 275,000 in February, and the unemployment rate increased to 3.9 percent, the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics reported today. Job gains occurred in health care, in government, in food services and drinking places, in social assistance, and in transportation and warehousing.

Here are the jobs that were created and lost in the previous month:

IMG_5092

In this jobs report, the unemployment rate for education levels looks like this:

  • Less than a high school diploma: 6.1%
  • High school graduate and no college: 4.2%
  • Some college or associate degree: 3.1%
  • Bachelor’s degree or higher: 2.2%
IMG_5093_320f22

Today’s report has continued the trend of the labor data beating my expectations, only because I am looking for the jobs data to slow down to a level of 140K-165K, which hasn’t happened yet. I wouldn’t categorize the labor market as being tight anymore because of the quits ratio and the hires data in the job openings report. This also shows itself in the employment cost index as well. These are key data lines for the Fed and the reason we are going to see three rate cuts this year.

Read More

Continue Reading

Uncategorized

Inside The Most Ridiculous Jobs Report In History: Record 1.2 Million Immigrant Jobs Added In One Month

Inside The Most Ridiculous Jobs Report In History: Record 1.2 Million Immigrant Jobs Added In One Month

Last month we though that the January…

Published

on

Inside The Most Ridiculous Jobs Report In History: Record 1.2 Million Immigrant Jobs Added In One Month

Last month we though that the January jobs report was the "most ridiculous in recent history" but, boy, were we wrong because this morning the Biden department of goalseeked propaganda (aka BLS) published the February jobs report, and holy crap was that something else. Even Goebbels would blush. 

What happened? Let's take a closer look.

On the surface, it was (almost) another blockbuster jobs report, certainly one which nobody expected, or rather just one bank out of 76 expected. Starting at the top, the BLS reported that in February the US unexpectedly added 275K jobs, with just one research analyst (from Dai-Ichi Research) expecting a higher number.

Some context: after last month's record 4-sigma beat, today's print was "only" 3 sigma higher than estimates. Needless to say, two multiple sigma beats in a row used to only happen in the USSR... and now in the US, apparently.

Before we go any further, a quick note on what last month we said was "the most ridiculous jobs report in recent history": it appears the BLS read our comments and decided to stop beclowing itself. It did that by slashing last month's ridiculous print by over a third, and revising what was originally reported as a massive 353K beat to just 229K,  a 124K revision, which was the biggest one-month negative revision in two years!

Of course, that does not mean that this month's jobs print won't be revised lower: it will be, and not just that month but every other month until the November election because that's the only tool left in the Biden admin's box: pretend the economic and jobs are strong, then revise them sharply lower the next month, something we pointed out first last summer and which has not failed to disappoint once.

To be fair, not every aspect of the jobs report was stellar (after all, the BLS had to give it some vague credibility). Take the unemployment rate, after flatlining between 3.4% and 3.8% for two years - and thus denying expectations from Sahm's Rule that a recession may have already started - in February the unemployment rate unexpectedly jumped to 3.9%, the highest since February 2022 (with Black unemployment spiking by 0.3% to 5.6%, an indicator which the Biden admin will quickly slam as widespread economic racism or something).

And then there were average hourly earnings, which after surging 0.6% MoM in January (since revised to 0.5%) and spooking markets that wage growth is so hot, the Fed will have no choice but to delay cuts, in February the number tumbled to just 0.1%, the lowest in two years...

... for one simple reason: last month's average wage surge had nothing to do with actual wages, and everything to do with the BLS estimate of hours worked (which is the denominator in the average wage calculation) which last month tumbled to just 34.1 (we were led to believe) the lowest since the covid pandemic...

... but has since been revised higher while the February print rose even more, to 34.3, hence why the latest average wage data was once again a product not of wages going up, but of how long Americans worked in any weekly period, in this case higher from 34.1 to 34.3, an increase which has a major impact on the average calculation.

While the above data points were examples of some latent weakness in the latest report, perhaps meant to give it a sheen of veracity, it was everything else in the report that was a problem starting with the BLS's latest choice of seasonal adjustments (after last month's wholesale revision), which have gone from merely laughable to full clownshow, as the following comparison between the monthly change in BLS and ADP payrolls shows. The trend is clear: the Biden admin numbers are now clearly rising even as the impartial ADP (which directly logs employment numbers at the company level and is far more accurate), shows an accelerating slowdown.

But it's more than just the Biden admin hanging its "success" on seasonal adjustments: when one digs deeper inside the jobs report, all sorts of ugly things emerge... such as the growing unprecedented divergence between the Establishment (payrolls) survey and much more accurate Household (actual employment) survey. To wit, while in January the BLS claims 275K payrolls were added, the Household survey found that the number of actually employed workers dropped for the third straight month (and 4 in the past 5), this time by 184K (from 161.152K to 160.968K).

This means that while the Payrolls series hits new all time highs every month since December 2020 (when according to the BLS the US had its last month of payrolls losses), the level of Employment has not budged in the past year. Worse, as shown in the chart below, such a gaping divergence has opened between the two series in the past 4 years, that the number of Employed workers would need to soar by 9 million (!) to catch up to what Payrolls claims is the employment situation.

There's more: shifting from a quantitative to a qualitative assessment, reveals just how ugly the composition of "new jobs" has been. Consider this: the BLS reports that in February 2024, the US had 132.9 million full-time jobs and 27.9 million part-time jobs. Well, that's great... until you look back one year and find that in February 2023 the US had 133.2 million full-time jobs, or more than it does one year later! And yes, all the job growth since then has been in part-time jobs, which have increased by 921K since February 2023 (from 27.020 million to 27.941 million).

Here is a summary of the labor composition in the past year: all the new jobs have been part-time jobs!

But wait there's even more, because now that the primary season is over and we enter the heart of election season and political talking points will be thrown around left and right, especially in the context of the immigration crisis created intentionally by the Biden administration which is hoping to import millions of new Democratic voters (maybe the US can hold the presidential election in Honduras or Guatemala, after all it is their citizens that will be illegally casting the key votes in November), what we find is that in February, the number of native-born workers tumbled again, sliding by a massive 560K to just 129.807 million. Add to this the December data, and we get a near-record 2.4 million plunge in native-born workers in just the past 3 months (only the covid crash was worse)!

The offset? A record 1.2 million foreign-born (read immigrants, both legal and illegal but mostly illegal) workers added in February!

Said otherwise, not only has all job creation in the past 6 years has been exclusively for foreign-born workers...

Source: St Louis Fed FRED Native Born and Foreign Born

... but there has been zero job-creation for native born workers since June 2018!

This is a huge issue - especially at a time of an illegal alien flood at the southwest border...

... and is about to become a huge political scandal, because once the inevitable recession finally hits, there will be millions of furious unemployed Americans demanding a more accurate explanation for what happened - i.e., the illegal immigration floodgates that were opened by the Biden admin.

Which is also why Biden's handlers will do everything in their power to insure there is no official recession before November... and why after the election is over, all economic hell will finally break loose. Until then, however, expect the jobs numbers to get even more ridiculous.

Tyler Durden Fri, 03/08/2024 - 13:30

Read More

Continue Reading

Trending