Connect with us

Uncategorized

Amazon area manager salary, benefits, job requirements, and more

At Amazon, area managers run teams of 50–100 associates in massive fulfillment centers where customer orders are sorted, packed, and shipped. It’s a…

Published

on

Amazon AMZN is the undisputed online retail Goliath of the U.S., and Americans account for around 80% of the shopping site’s users worldwide. The Jeff Bezos-founded e-commerce behemoth shipped around 4.75 billion packages in 2021, and as of mid-2023, around 163.5 million Americans — almost half of the country’s population — were subscribed to Amazon Prime, the company’s premium paid membership service. As of 2022, the shipping and logistics giant had captured 37.8% of the U.S. retail e-commerce space by market share according to Statista, more than any other online retailer by a massive margin.

Just how does the self-proclaimed “most customer-centric company on Earth” accomplish this? Largely by harnessing the labor of its massive supply of fulfillment, sortation, and delivery associates — workers who are required to meet lofty package-handling quotas for relatively low hourly pay, and who quit and get dismissed at very high rates for the industry.

Related: Amazon delivery driver salary: How much they really make

In order to keep its massive fulfillment centers running efficiently, Amazon employs area managers responsible for overseeing the accuracy and efficiency of the package sorting, handling, and shipping processes. These aren’t your typical “white collar” desk jockeys though. Amazon’s area managers work largely on their feet, overseeing hectic shifts using a hands-on approach to ensure their not-so-little corner of Amazon’s massive and complex supply chain functions like a well-oiled machine.

These area manager jobs, unlike associate positions, require a bachelor’s degree and come with an annual salary instead of an hourly wage. Since these are exempt positions, they are not eligible for overtime pay — a fairly significant caveat for a job that, according to many anecdotal reports on Reddit and career sites like Indeed, regularly requires 50+ hour weeks and often requires 60–70 hour weeks during peak season (November and December).

Amazon fulfillment centers are massive warehouses.

Michael Nagle/Bloomberg via Getty Images

How much do area managers make at Amazon?

As of late 2023, Amazon offers entry-level area managers starting salaries that range from $62,500 per year in areas with lower costs of living to $68,000 per year in higher-paid markets. This range represents the position’s base salary and does not include the value of bonuses, stock awards, or other perks and benefits.
According to Glassdoor, a careers site that uses user-submitted data to estimate salary ranges, area managers are likely to make around $84,000 per year, including a base salary of around $64,200, annual bonuses totaling around $9,500, and stock awards totaling around $10,200. The user-submitted data used to calculate these estimates comes from area managers with varying degrees of seniority, however, so it is unlikely that a new area manager would make this much in their first year.

With continued success in an area manager role, base pay, along with stock incentives and bonuses, can increase gradually, with some eventually earning six figures annually in total compensation.

What does an Amazon area manager do on a day-to-day basis?

An area manager is essentially an overseer of an Amazon fulfillment center for about 10 to 14 hours at a time. This means that they are responsible for the safety and productivity of a large team of Amazon associates (perhaps 50 to 100), whose jobs include picking, sorting, packing, routing, moving, and otherwise handling Amazon packages so they can move along the company supply chain toward the customer.

Amazon fulfillment centers are all about efficiency, and area managers are tasked with setting and meeting efficiency goals. This process involves hiring, training, monitoring, coaching — and sometimes firing and replacing — associates such that key performance indicators (i.e., package handling quotas) are met.

This is a high-paced role that demands, above all else, attentiveness, wakefulness, attention to detail, quick problem-solving, and the ability to effectively lead a team of laborers in a hectic and uncomfortable warehouse environment.

What are the advantages of working as an area manager for Amazon?

An area manager position at an Amazon fulfillment warehouse can be a solid jumping-off point for anyone with a college degree and aspirations to work in team management or project management, especially in the logistics industry. Internal promotions are common — according to some reports, as many as 20% of area managers get promoted each year. Amazon is a massive employer with opportunities all over the U.S. and the globe, so a wealth of future placements may be available for those looking to explore the role.

As such a large and well-established company, it is likely that the stock an area manager earns over time, once vested, could grow quite significantly in value, providing an additional incentive to remain with the massive publicly traded company.

What are the downsides of working as an area manager?

The downsides to working as an area manager at an Amazon fulfillment center are, unfortunately, many. Some of the most noticeable are stress, fatigue, physical exhaustion, and managing, disciplining and firing employees.

Area managers are responsible for ensuring targets are met, which means that, in addition to working long shifts on their feet, they must constantly monitor associate performance and remedy any situations that are preventing quotas from being met. This requires demanding a high level of performance from a large team of relatively underpaid laborers working nonstop in an often too-hot warehouse, which isn’t necessarily conducive to popularity. A large part of an area manager’s role is issuing documented warnings to associates for making mistakes or failing to meet goals and potentially taking disciplinary action, including termination, as per the company’s protocols.

Area managers routinely spend 50–70 hours each week in a large warehouse like this one. 

(Photo by Nathan Stirk/Getty Images)

What benefits do Amazon’s area managers get?

Amazon’s benefits can vary depending on location, but in general, any Amazon employee who works more than 20 hours per week (which area managers certainly do) is eligible for a fairly standard suite of benefits, the highlights of which include the following:

Health and insurance benefits

Amazon employees can choose from a variety of sponsored healthcare plans through several different providers, including Cigna, Kaiser, Aetna, and Premera Blue Cross. The different plans come with different copays, deductibles, prescription drug prices, and out-of-pocket maximums, so employees can select the plan they believe will be most accessible and financially advantageous given their individual healthcare needs.

Employees can also choose from two different dental plans and two different vision plans. A full list of available plans and their details is available on Amazon’s jobs site.

Amazon also offers mental health referrals and five free counseling sessions (per specific issue) to each employee annually, and employees can choose to contribute to tax-advantaged health savings and flexible savings accounts as well.

Amazon provides free basic life insurance policies for all eligible employees, and supplemental insurance plans, including home, rent, auto, pet, accident, and illness, can also be purchased at a discount.

Financial benefits

Amazon employees can contribute to sponsored Roth or traditional 401(k) via deductions from their paycheck. The company matches employee contributions up to 4% of each paycheck at a rate of 50%, meaning an employee can get the maximum 2% match if they contribute 4%.

Employees may also receive grants of restricted stock units (RSUs) — special shares of company equity — that vest over time. Once the shares vest, they are assigned a fair market value and can be legally sold by the employee.

Time off

Amazon offers fairly robust paid leaves in certain circumstances. 14 weeks of paid leave for pregnancy are available with doctor-ordered short-term disability, while six weeks of paid parental leave are available to all employees after one year of employment.

Paid time off and sick time policies vary depending on location and are specified in each manager’s employment contract.

Additionally, due to the position’s exempt status and heavy workload, the pay may not actually be as good as it sounds. If an area manager works an average of 57 hours per week at an annual salary of $64,000, for instance, they are actually only earning around 21.59 per hour, assuming they work all 52 weeks of the year.

Related: UPS driver salary: How much you’d make driving the big brown truck

Frequently asked questions (FAQ)

Below are answers to some of the most common questions prospective applicants have about the area manager role at Amazon.

What is an area manager intern?

For undergraduates who are still in school but plan to graduate within a year or so, Amazon offers 10-week summer internships through which students essentially work as an Amazon area manager. According to Amazon’s jobs site, these internships pay an hourly wage of $26.44 to $31.49 per hour depending on the geographic market.

Area manager vs. operations manager: What’s the difference?

Within the Amazon organization, Operations Manager 1 is the technical title for an area manager, while Operations Managers 2–4 are higher up in the organization. An Operations Manager 2, for instance, usually has three to five area managers under them.

Do you have to pass a drug or background test to be an area manager?

After receiving a job offer, a candidate must pass both a cheek-swab-style drug screen and a background check in order to complete the hiring process and become an area manager.

Are area managers exempt from overtime pay?

Area managers are salaried and exempt from overtime pay according to Amazon, although a California-based class-action lawsuit filed in 2022 asserts that the area manager role does not meet the “executive, administrative, or professional exemptions” required to assign exempt status and withhold overtime. 

Read More

Continue Reading

Uncategorized

February Employment Situation

By Paul Gomme and Peter Rupert The establishment data from the BLS showed a 275,000 increase in payroll employment for February, outpacing the 230,000…

Published

on

By Paul Gomme and Peter Rupert

The establishment data from the BLS showed a 275,000 increase in payroll employment for February, outpacing the 230,000 average over the previous 12 months. The payroll data for January and December were revised down by a total of 167,000. The private sector added 223,000 new jobs, the largest gain since May of last year.

Temporary help services employment continues a steep decline after a sharp post-pandemic rise.

Average hours of work increased from 34.2 to 34.3. The increase, along with the 223,000 private employment increase led to a hefty increase in total hours of 5.6% at an annualized rate, also the largest increase since May of last year.

The establishment report, once again, beat “expectations;” the WSJ survey of economists was 198,000. Other than the downward revisions, mentioned above, another bit of negative news was a smallish increase in wage growth, from $34.52 to $34.57.

The household survey shows that the labor force increased 150,000, a drop in employment of 184,000 and an increase in the number of unemployed persons of 334,000. The labor force participation rate held steady at 62.5, the employment to population ratio decreased from 60.2 to 60.1 and the unemployment rate increased from 3.66 to 3.86. Remember that the unemployment rate is the number of unemployed relative to the labor force (the number employed plus the number unemployed). Consequently, the unemployment rate can go up if the number of unemployed rises holding fixed the labor force, or if the labor force shrinks holding the number unemployed unchanged. An increase in the unemployment rate is not necessarily a bad thing: it may reflect a strong labor market drawing “marginally attached” individuals from outside the labor force. Indeed, there was a 96,000 decline in those workers.

Earlier in the week, the BLS announced JOLTS (Job Openings and Labor Turnover Survey) data for January. There isn’t much to report here as the job openings changed little at 8.9 million, the number of hires and total separations were little changed at 5.7 million and 5.3 million, respectively.

As has been the case for the last couple of years, the number of job openings remains higher than the number of unemployed persons.

Also earlier in the week the BLS announced that productivity increased 3.2% in the 4th quarter with output rising 3.5% and hours of work rising 0.3%.

The bottom line is that the labor market continues its surprisingly (to some) strong performance, once again proving stronger than many had expected. This strength makes it difficult to justify any interest rate cuts soon, particularly given the recent inflation spike.

Read More

Continue Reading

Uncategorized

Mortgage rates fall as labor market normalizes

Jobless claims show an expanding economy. We will only be in a recession once jobless claims exceed 323,000 on a four-week moving average.

Published

on

Everyone was waiting to see if this week’s jobs report would send mortgage rates higher, which is what happened last month. Instead, the 10-year yield had a muted response after the headline number beat estimates, but we have negative job revisions from previous months. The Federal Reserve’s fear of wage growth spiraling out of control hasn’t materialized for over two years now and the unemployment rate ticked up to 3.9%. For now, we can say the labor market isn’t tight anymore, but it’s also not breaking.

The key labor data line in this expansion is the weekly jobless claims report. Jobless claims show an expanding economy that has not lost jobs yet. We will only be in a recession once jobless claims exceed 323,000 on a four-week moving average.

From the Fed: In the week ended March 2, initial claims for unemployment insurance benefits were flat, at 217,000. The four-week moving average declined slightly by 750, to 212,250


Below is an explanation of how we got here with the labor market, which all started during COVID-19.

1. I wrote the COVID-19 recovery model on April 7, 2020, and retired it on Dec. 9, 2020. By that time, the upfront recovery phase was done, and I needed to model out when we would get the jobs lost back.

2. Early in the labor market recovery, when we saw weaker job reports, I doubled and tripled down on my assertion that job openings would get to 10 million in this recovery. Job openings rose as high as to 12 million and are currently over 9 million. Even with the massive miss on a job report in May 2021, I didn’t waver.

Currently, the jobs openings, quit percentage and hires data are below pre-COVID-19 levels, which means the labor market isn’t as tight as it once was, and this is why the employment cost index has been slowing data to move along the quits percentage.  

2-US_Job_Quits_Rate-1-2

3. I wrote that we should get back all the jobs lost to COVID-19 by September of 2022. At the time this would be a speedy labor market recovery, and it happened on schedule, too

Total employment data

4. This is the key one for right now: If COVID-19 hadn’t happened, we would have between 157 million and 159 million jobs today, which would have been in line with the job growth rate in February 2020. Today, we are at 157,808,000. This is important because job growth should be cooling down now. We are more in line with where the labor market should be when averaging 140K-165K monthly. So for now, the fact that we aren’t trending between 140K-165K means we still have a bit more recovery kick left before we get down to those levels. 




From BLS: Total nonfarm payroll employment rose by 275,000 in February, and the unemployment rate increased to 3.9 percent, the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics reported today. Job gains occurred in health care, in government, in food services and drinking places, in social assistance, and in transportation and warehousing.

Here are the jobs that were created and lost in the previous month:

IMG_5092

In this jobs report, the unemployment rate for education levels looks like this:

  • Less than a high school diploma: 6.1%
  • High school graduate and no college: 4.2%
  • Some college or associate degree: 3.1%
  • Bachelor’s degree or higher: 2.2%
IMG_5093_320f22

Today’s report has continued the trend of the labor data beating my expectations, only because I am looking for the jobs data to slow down to a level of 140K-165K, which hasn’t happened yet. I wouldn’t categorize the labor market as being tight anymore because of the quits ratio and the hires data in the job openings report. This also shows itself in the employment cost index as well. These are key data lines for the Fed and the reason we are going to see three rate cuts this year.

Read More

Continue Reading

Uncategorized

Inside The Most Ridiculous Jobs Report In History: Record 1.2 Million Immigrant Jobs Added In One Month

Inside The Most Ridiculous Jobs Report In History: Record 1.2 Million Immigrant Jobs Added In One Month

Last month we though that the January…

Published

on

Inside The Most Ridiculous Jobs Report In History: Record 1.2 Million Immigrant Jobs Added In One Month

Last month we though that the January jobs report was the "most ridiculous in recent history" but, boy, were we wrong because this morning the Biden department of goalseeked propaganda (aka BLS) published the February jobs report, and holy crap was that something else. Even Goebbels would blush. 

What happened? Let's take a closer look.

On the surface, it was (almost) another blockbuster jobs report, certainly one which nobody expected, or rather just one bank out of 76 expected. Starting at the top, the BLS reported that in February the US unexpectedly added 275K jobs, with just one research analyst (from Dai-Ichi Research) expecting a higher number.

Some context: after last month's record 4-sigma beat, today's print was "only" 3 sigma higher than estimates. Needless to say, two multiple sigma beats in a row used to only happen in the USSR... and now in the US, apparently.

Before we go any further, a quick note on what last month we said was "the most ridiculous jobs report in recent history": it appears the BLS read our comments and decided to stop beclowing itself. It did that by slashing last month's ridiculous print by over a third, and revising what was originally reported as a massive 353K beat to just 229K,  a 124K revision, which was the biggest one-month negative revision in two years!

Of course, that does not mean that this month's jobs print won't be revised lower: it will be, and not just that month but every other month until the November election because that's the only tool left in the Biden admin's box: pretend the economic and jobs are strong, then revise them sharply lower the next month, something we pointed out first last summer and which has not failed to disappoint once.

To be fair, not every aspect of the jobs report was stellar (after all, the BLS had to give it some vague credibility). Take the unemployment rate, after flatlining between 3.4% and 3.8% for two years - and thus denying expectations from Sahm's Rule that a recession may have already started - in February the unemployment rate unexpectedly jumped to 3.9%, the highest since February 2022 (with Black unemployment spiking by 0.3% to 5.6%, an indicator which the Biden admin will quickly slam as widespread economic racism or something).

And then there were average hourly earnings, which after surging 0.6% MoM in January (since revised to 0.5%) and spooking markets that wage growth is so hot, the Fed will have no choice but to delay cuts, in February the number tumbled to just 0.1%, the lowest in two years...

... for one simple reason: last month's average wage surge had nothing to do with actual wages, and everything to do with the BLS estimate of hours worked (which is the denominator in the average wage calculation) which last month tumbled to just 34.1 (we were led to believe) the lowest since the covid pandemic...

... but has since been revised higher while the February print rose even more, to 34.3, hence why the latest average wage data was once again a product not of wages going up, but of how long Americans worked in any weekly period, in this case higher from 34.1 to 34.3, an increase which has a major impact on the average calculation.

While the above data points were examples of some latent weakness in the latest report, perhaps meant to give it a sheen of veracity, it was everything else in the report that was a problem starting with the BLS's latest choice of seasonal adjustments (after last month's wholesale revision), which have gone from merely laughable to full clownshow, as the following comparison between the monthly change in BLS and ADP payrolls shows. The trend is clear: the Biden admin numbers are now clearly rising even as the impartial ADP (which directly logs employment numbers at the company level and is far more accurate), shows an accelerating slowdown.

But it's more than just the Biden admin hanging its "success" on seasonal adjustments: when one digs deeper inside the jobs report, all sorts of ugly things emerge... such as the growing unprecedented divergence between the Establishment (payrolls) survey and much more accurate Household (actual employment) survey. To wit, while in January the BLS claims 275K payrolls were added, the Household survey found that the number of actually employed workers dropped for the third straight month (and 4 in the past 5), this time by 184K (from 161.152K to 160.968K).

This means that while the Payrolls series hits new all time highs every month since December 2020 (when according to the BLS the US had its last month of payrolls losses), the level of Employment has not budged in the past year. Worse, as shown in the chart below, such a gaping divergence has opened between the two series in the past 4 years, that the number of Employed workers would need to soar by 9 million (!) to catch up to what Payrolls claims is the employment situation.

There's more: shifting from a quantitative to a qualitative assessment, reveals just how ugly the composition of "new jobs" has been. Consider this: the BLS reports that in February 2024, the US had 132.9 million full-time jobs and 27.9 million part-time jobs. Well, that's great... until you look back one year and find that in February 2023 the US had 133.2 million full-time jobs, or more than it does one year later! And yes, all the job growth since then has been in part-time jobs, which have increased by 921K since February 2023 (from 27.020 million to 27.941 million).

Here is a summary of the labor composition in the past year: all the new jobs have been part-time jobs!

But wait there's even more, because now that the primary season is over and we enter the heart of election season and political talking points will be thrown around left and right, especially in the context of the immigration crisis created intentionally by the Biden administration which is hoping to import millions of new Democratic voters (maybe the US can hold the presidential election in Honduras or Guatemala, after all it is their citizens that will be illegally casting the key votes in November), what we find is that in February, the number of native-born workers tumbled again, sliding by a massive 560K to just 129.807 million. Add to this the December data, and we get a near-record 2.4 million plunge in native-born workers in just the past 3 months (only the covid crash was worse)!

The offset? A record 1.2 million foreign-born (read immigrants, both legal and illegal but mostly illegal) workers added in February!

Said otherwise, not only has all job creation in the past 6 years has been exclusively for foreign-born workers...

Source: St Louis Fed FRED Native Born and Foreign Born

... but there has been zero job-creation for native born workers since June 2018!

This is a huge issue - especially at a time of an illegal alien flood at the southwest border...

... and is about to become a huge political scandal, because once the inevitable recession finally hits, there will be millions of furious unemployed Americans demanding a more accurate explanation for what happened - i.e., the illegal immigration floodgates that were opened by the Biden admin.

Which is also why Biden's handlers will do everything in their power to insure there is no official recession before November... and why after the election is over, all economic hell will finally break loose. Until then, however, expect the jobs numbers to get even more ridiculous.

Tyler Durden Fri, 03/08/2024 - 13:30

Read More

Continue Reading

Trending