Connect with us

3 “Strong Buy” Precious Metal Stocks to Mine For

3 "Strong Buy" Precious Metal Stocks to Mine For

Published

on

In times of high volatility, precious metals would see increased purchases as investors seek a safe haven. Gold, the original hard cash, is the tradition safe play, the place where investors can park their money and see it hold its value. With gold on the way up, stock investors will naturally be looking for a way to buy in – and they can do this while sticking to the stock markets.

In the hope of coming across some hidden gems, we turned to TipRanks’ database. With the investing platform’s help, we were able to zero in on three precious metal stocks getting nods of approval from the analyst community, enough so to have a 'Strong Buy' consensus rating bestowed upon them. Let's take a closer look.

Barrick Gold Corporation (GOLD)

We’ll start with number two, the world’s second largest gold mining company, Barrick. This company, based in Toronto, taps into Canada’s well-known expertise in mining and resource extraction and channels it into gold and copper mines, with operations in 15 countries. In 2019, Barrick saw a 21% year-over-year increase in its gold output, reaching 5.5 million ounces, and also pulled 432 million pounds of copper out of the ground.

Barrick finished up 2019 with a solid quarterly performance. The 17-cent EPS beat the forecast, while the $2.88 billion in quarterly revenue represented 51% year-over-year growth. Looking ahead, analysts project Q1 EPS at 19 cents – a sharp contrast to last the year-ago figure of 11 cents.

Barrick’s strong and stable position in the gold mining industry have attracted Wall Street’s attention. Writing from Deutsche Bank, analyst Chris Terry put a Buy rating on the stock, with a $25 price target that suggests an upside of 25%. (To watch Terry’s track record, click here)

Supporting his contention, Terry stated, “Barrick is one of the largest gold companies globally and we believe the company is well positioned to benefit from a rising gold-price environment, and one of the first companies asset allocators looking for gold exposure will be drawn towards [...] We anticipate ~10% FCF yield in 2020 on our revised gold forecasts,a very attractive yield, particularly when compared to falling interest rates. In addition we expect the company to continue to progressively increase its dividend over the next few quarters given the strength of its balance sheet."

Also bullish is UBS’ Daniel Major, who wrote of GOLD, “We expect gold prices will remain well supported given low interest rates and negative GDP revisions... We think Barrick's and the gold price selloff were a function of rebalancing around global stock market moves. We expect Barrick to re-rate higher once the sharp moves in global equity markets begin to stabilize… Barrick will remain shareholder friendly with a focus on dividend growth…”

In line with this optimistic view, Major upgrades his stance on GOLD, from Neutral to Buy. His price target, set at $22, implies an upside of 10%. (To watch Major’s track record, click here)

Overall, GOLD shares have a Strong Buy rating from the analyst consensus, based on 6 Buys and 1 Hold rating. The stock sells for a low price of $20.16, and the $22.60 average price target is indicative of a 12% upside potential for the stock this year. (See Barrick stock analysis on TipRanks)

B2Gold Corporation (BTG)

Next on our list is Canada-based gold producer, B2Gold. The company controls five mines, with its operations widely dispersed in Africa, Central America, and the Philippines. Success in both attracting investors and resource exploration have allowed the company to expand in recent years, and pushed BTG shares to a 37.5% gain in 2019.

B2Gold had a solid finish to 2019. In Q4, the company produced 980,219 ounces of gold, beating the high end of its own forward guidance and generating $1.15 billion in revenue. That top-line number represented 10% year-over-year growth.

Looking ahead, the company has guided toward just over 1 million ounces of gold production for 2020, and stands by that even in the current climate. For now, B2Gold is able to maintain production at all five of its active sites despite the COVID-19 pandemic.

5-star analyst Ovais Habib, covering B2Gold for Scotiabank, sees reason for optimism in this stock. He maintains his Buy rating along with a price target of C$6.25, or $4.40 in US currency. This implies a substantial 21% upside potential for the shares in 2020. To watch Habib’s track record, click here)

Backing his bullish stance on B2Gold, Habib says, “BTO continues gold production and gold shipments and the company benefits from ample onsite stockpiles and high levels of onsite supplies/spares/consumables. Financially, BTO remains well positioned with cash of $140M and $200M drawn on the $600M credit facility…”

Habib adds, summing up B2Gold's position, “The company remains focused on the organic pipeline... BTO has many promising exploration targets to follow up. Mines continue to run and the company has been taking advantage of lower fuel prices…”

B2Gold has a unanimous Strong Buy analyst consensus rating, with 7 Buys set in recent weeks. Shares are priced at a discount – selling for just C$4.87 or US$3.43, even qualifies as a penny stock – but the average price target of C$6.97 (US$4.91) implies an impressive upside potential of 35%. (See B2Gold stock analysis on TipRanks)

Newmont Mining (NEM)

Last on our list is Newmont, which with a $38 billion market cap is the world’s largest gold mining company. Newmont boasted $1.4 billion in free cash flow for 2019, produced 6.3 million ounces of gold, and controls some 100.2 million ounces in recoverable gold mineral reserves. Taken together, it’s no wonder that NEM shares have managed a net gain while the broader markets have slumped.

Looking ahead, the company guides toward 6.4 million ounces of gold production in 2020, and sets an annual range of 6.2 million to 6.7 million ounces annually through 2024. Sometimes, it’s just plain good to sit on a gold mine. Or several of them.

Of additional interest to investors, Newmont made headlines in January when it agreed to a $10 billion deal to acquire Goldcorp. The move will create the world’s largest gold producer by output. Also in the news, Newmont in March closed out a senior note offering which brought in $1 billion in funding. The notes are due in 2030, and will be used to refinance current debt at lower interest rates; the company is effectively reducing its interest rates from 3.5% and 3.7% down to 2.25%.

Raymond James analyst Brian MacArthur provides coverage of this stock. He lowers his price target from $58 to $56, mainly due to concerns over the COVID-19 impact on operations, but keeps his Buy rating on the shares. His new price target implies an upside of 12%. (To watch MacArthur’s track record, click here)

MacArthur writes, “the company expects that some production could be deferred into 2021, potentially impacting costs in 2020 if some operations are on care and maintenance for an extended period… Newmont is not currently experiencing significant delays in the shipping of concentrate or transportation and refining of ore, but expects that delays may occur in the coming days and weeks if certain government-required shutdowns and border restrictions occur.”

All in all, Newmont’s Strong Buy analyst consensus rating is based on 7 Buys and 2 Holds from recent reviews. The stock is selling for $47.15, and the $52.64 average price target suggests it has room for modest 5% upside growth in the coming 12 months. (See Newmont stock analysis on TipRanks)

To find good ideas for gold stocks trading at attractive valuations, visit TipRanks’ Best Stocks to Buy, a newly launched tool that unites all of TipRanks’ equity insights.

The post 3 "Strong Buy" Precious Metal Stocks to Mine For appeared first on TipRanks Financial Blog.

Read More

Continue Reading

Spread & Containment

The Coming Of The Police State In America

The Coming Of The Police State In America

Authored by Jeffrey Tucker via The Epoch Times,

The National Guard and the State Police are now…

Published

on

The Coming Of The Police State In America

Authored by Jeffrey Tucker via The Epoch Times,

The National Guard and the State Police are now patrolling the New York City subway system in an attempt to do something about the explosion of crime. As part of this, there are bag checks and new surveillance of all passengers. No legislation, no debate, just an edict from the mayor.

Many citizens who rely on this system for transportation might welcome this. It’s a city of strict gun control, and no one knows for sure if they have the right to defend themselves. Merchants have been harassed and even arrested for trying to stop looting and pillaging in their own shops.

The message has been sent: Only the police can do this job. Whether they do it or not is another matter.

Things on the subway system have gotten crazy. If you know it well, you can manage to travel safely, but visitors to the city who take the wrong train at the wrong time are taking grave risks.

In actual fact, it’s guaranteed that this will only end in confiscating knives and other things that people carry in order to protect themselves while leaving the actual criminals even more free to prey on citizens.

The law-abiding will suffer and the criminals will grow more numerous. It will not end well.

When you step back from the details, what we have is the dawning of a genuine police state in the United States. It only starts in New York City. Where is the Guard going to be deployed next? Anywhere is possible.

If the crime is bad enough, citizens will welcome it. It must have been this way in most times and places that when the police state arrives, the people cheer.

We will all have our own stories of how this came to be. Some might begin with the passage of the Patriot Act and the establishment of the Department of Homeland Security in 2001. Some will focus on gun control and the taking away of citizens’ rights to defend themselves.

My own version of events is closer in time. It began four years ago this month with lockdowns. That’s what shattered the capacity of civil society to function in the United States. Everything that has happened since follows like one domino tumbling after another.

It goes like this:

1) lockdown,

2) loss of moral compass and spreading of loneliness and nihilism,

3) rioting resulting from citizen frustration, 4) police absent because of ideological hectoring,

5) a rise in uncontrolled immigration/refugees,

6) an epidemic of ill health from substance abuse and otherwise,

7) businesses flee the city

8) cities fall into decay, and that results in

9) more surveillance and police state.

The 10th stage is the sacking of liberty and civilization itself.

It doesn’t fall out this way at every point in history, but this seems like a solid outline of what happened in this case. Four years is a very short period of time to see all of this unfold. But it is a fact that New York City was more-or-less civilized only four years ago. No one could have predicted that it would come to this so quickly.

But once the lockdowns happened, all bets were off. Here we had a policy that most directly trampled on all freedoms that we had taken for granted. Schools, businesses, and churches were slammed shut, with various levels of enforcement. The entire workforce was divided between essential and nonessential, and there was widespread confusion about who precisely was in charge of designating and enforcing this.

It felt like martial law at the time, as if all normal civilian law had been displaced by something else. That something had to do with public health, but there was clearly more going on, because suddenly our social media posts were censored and we were being asked to do things that made no sense, such as mask up for a virus that evaded mask protection and walk in only one direction in grocery aisles.

Vast amounts of the white-collar workforce stayed home—and their kids, too—until it became too much to bear. The city became a ghost town. Most U.S. cities were the same.

As the months of disaster rolled on, the captives were let out of their houses for the summer in order to protest racism but no other reason. As a way of excusing this, the same public health authorities said that racism was a virus as bad as COVID-19, so therefore it was permitted.

The protests had turned to riots in many cities, and the police were being defunded and discouraged to do anything about the problem. Citizens watched in horror as downtowns burned and drug-crazed freaks took over whole sections of cities. It was like every standard of decency had been zapped out of an entire swath of the population.

Meanwhile, large checks were arriving in people’s bank accounts, defying every normal economic expectation. How could people not be working and get their bank accounts more flush with cash than ever? There was a new law that didn’t even require that people pay rent. How weird was that? Even student loans didn’t need to be paid.

By the fall, recess from lockdown was over and everyone was told to go home again. But this time they had a job to do: They were supposed to vote. Not at the polling places, because going there would only spread germs, or so the media said. When the voting results finally came in, it was the absentee ballots that swung the election in favor of the opposition party that actually wanted more lockdowns and eventually pushed vaccine mandates on the whole population.

The new party in control took note of the large population movements out of cities and states that they controlled. This would have a large effect on voting patterns in the future. But they had a plan. They would open the borders to millions of people in the guise of caring for refugees. These new warm bodies would become voters in time and certainly count on the census when it came time to reapportion political power.

Meanwhile, the native population had begun to swim in ill health from substance abuse, widespread depression, and demoralization, plus vaccine injury. This increased dependency on the very institutions that had caused the problem in the first place: the medical/scientific establishment.

The rise of crime drove the small businesses out of the city. They had barely survived the lockdowns, but they certainly could not survive the crime epidemic. This undermined the tax base of the city and allowed the criminals to take further control.

The same cities became sanctuaries for the waves of migrants sacking the country, and partisan mayors actually used tax dollars to house these invaders in high-end hotels in the name of having compassion for the stranger. Citizens were pushed out to make way for rampaging migrant hordes, as incredible as this seems.

But with that, of course, crime rose ever further, inciting citizen anger and providing a pretext to bring in the police state in the form of the National Guard, now tasked with cracking down on crime in the transportation system.

What’s the next step? It’s probably already here: mass surveillance and censorship, plus ever-expanding police power. This will be accompanied by further population movements, as those with the means to do so flee the city and even the country and leave it for everyone else to suffer.

As I tell the story, all of this seems inevitable. It is not. It could have been stopped at any point. A wise and prudent political leadership could have admitted the error from the beginning and called on the country to rediscover freedom, decency, and the difference between right and wrong. But ego and pride stopped that from happening, and we are left with the consequences.

The government grows ever bigger and civil society ever less capable of managing itself in large urban centers. Disaster is unfolding in real time, mitigated only by a rising stock market and a financial system that has yet to fall apart completely.

Are we at the middle stages of total collapse, or at the point where the population and people in leadership positions wise up and decide to put an end to the downward slide? It’s hard to know. But this much we do know: There is a growing pocket of resistance out there that is fed up and refuses to sit by and watch this great country be sacked and taken over by everything it was set up to prevent.

Tyler Durden Sat, 03/09/2024 - 16:20

Read More

Continue Reading

Government

Low Iron Levels In Blood Could Trigger Long COVID: Study

Low Iron Levels In Blood Could Trigger Long COVID: Study

Authored by Amie Dahnke via The Epoch Times (emphasis ours),

People with inadequate…

Published

on

Low Iron Levels In Blood Could Trigger Long COVID: Study

Authored by Amie Dahnke via The Epoch Times (emphasis ours),

People with inadequate iron levels in their blood due to a COVID-19 infection could be at greater risk of long COVID.

(Shutterstock)

A new study indicates that problems with iron levels in the bloodstream likely trigger chronic inflammation and other conditions associated with the post-COVID phenomenon. The findings, published on March 1 in Nature Immunology, could offer new ways to treat or prevent the condition.

Long COVID Patients Have Low Iron Levels

Researchers at the University of Cambridge pinpointed low iron as a potential link to long-COVID symptoms thanks to a study they initiated shortly after the start of the pandemic. They recruited people who tested positive for the virus to provide blood samples for analysis over a year, which allowed the researchers to look for post-infection changes in the blood. The researchers looked at 214 samples and found that 45 percent of patients reported symptoms of long COVID that lasted between three and 10 months.

In analyzing the blood samples, the research team noticed that people experiencing long COVID had low iron levels, contributing to anemia and low red blood cell production, just two weeks after they were diagnosed with COVID-19. This was true for patients regardless of age, sex, or the initial severity of their infection.

According to one of the study co-authors, the removal of iron from the bloodstream is a natural process and defense mechanism of the body.

But it can jeopardize a person’s recovery.

When the body has an infection, it responds by removing iron from the bloodstream. This protects us from potentially lethal bacteria that capture the iron in the bloodstream and grow rapidly. It’s an evolutionary response that redistributes iron in the body, and the blood plasma becomes an iron desert,” University of Oxford professor Hal Drakesmith said in a press release. “However, if this goes on for a long time, there is less iron for red blood cells, so oxygen is transported less efficiently affecting metabolism and energy production, and for white blood cells, which need iron to work properly. The protective mechanism ends up becoming a problem.”

The research team believes that consistently low iron levels could explain why individuals with long COVID continue to experience fatigue and difficulty exercising. As such, the researchers suggested iron supplementation to help regulate and prevent the often debilitating symptoms associated with long COVID.

It isn’t necessarily the case that individuals don’t have enough iron in their body, it’s just that it’s trapped in the wrong place,” Aimee Hanson, a postdoctoral researcher at the University of Cambridge who worked on the study, said in the press release. “What we need is a way to remobilize the iron and pull it back into the bloodstream, where it becomes more useful to the red blood cells.”

The research team pointed out that iron supplementation isn’t always straightforward. Achieving the right level of iron varies from person to person. Too much iron can cause stomach issues, ranging from constipation, nausea, and abdominal pain to gastritis and gastric lesions.

1 in 5 Still Affected by Long COVID

COVID-19 has affected nearly 40 percent of Americans, with one in five of those still suffering from symptoms of long COVID, according to the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Long COVID is marked by health issues that continue at least four weeks after an individual was initially diagnosed with COVID-19. Symptoms can last for days, weeks, months, or years and may include fatigue, cough or chest pain, headache, brain fog, depression or anxiety, digestive issues, and joint or muscle pain.

Tyler Durden Sat, 03/09/2024 - 12:50

Read More

Continue Reading

Uncategorized

February Employment Situation

By Paul Gomme and Peter Rupert The establishment data from the BLS showed a 275,000 increase in payroll employment for February, outpacing the 230,000…

Published

on

By Paul Gomme and Peter Rupert

The establishment data from the BLS showed a 275,000 increase in payroll employment for February, outpacing the 230,000 average over the previous 12 months. The payroll data for January and December were revised down by a total of 167,000. The private sector added 223,000 new jobs, the largest gain since May of last year.

Temporary help services employment continues a steep decline after a sharp post-pandemic rise.

Average hours of work increased from 34.2 to 34.3. The increase, along with the 223,000 private employment increase led to a hefty increase in total hours of 5.6% at an annualized rate, also the largest increase since May of last year.

The establishment report, once again, beat “expectations;” the WSJ survey of economists was 198,000. Other than the downward revisions, mentioned above, another bit of negative news was a smallish increase in wage growth, from $34.52 to $34.57.

The household survey shows that the labor force increased 150,000, a drop in employment of 184,000 and an increase in the number of unemployed persons of 334,000. The labor force participation rate held steady at 62.5, the employment to population ratio decreased from 60.2 to 60.1 and the unemployment rate increased from 3.66 to 3.86. Remember that the unemployment rate is the number of unemployed relative to the labor force (the number employed plus the number unemployed). Consequently, the unemployment rate can go up if the number of unemployed rises holding fixed the labor force, or if the labor force shrinks holding the number unemployed unchanged. An increase in the unemployment rate is not necessarily a bad thing: it may reflect a strong labor market drawing “marginally attached” individuals from outside the labor force. Indeed, there was a 96,000 decline in those workers.

Earlier in the week, the BLS announced JOLTS (Job Openings and Labor Turnover Survey) data for January. There isn’t much to report here as the job openings changed little at 8.9 million, the number of hires and total separations were little changed at 5.7 million and 5.3 million, respectively.

As has been the case for the last couple of years, the number of job openings remains higher than the number of unemployed persons.

Also earlier in the week the BLS announced that productivity increased 3.2% in the 4th quarter with output rising 3.5% and hours of work rising 0.3%.

The bottom line is that the labor market continues its surprisingly (to some) strong performance, once again proving stronger than many had expected. This strength makes it difficult to justify any interest rate cuts soon, particularly given the recent inflation spike.

Read More

Continue Reading

Trending