Connect with us

Government

Will The Economy Replace Ten Million Jobs By 2022?

“Employment will bounce back to pre-pandemic levels by December 31st, 2021.” – Bank of America

Popular forecasts call for a return to pre-pandemic levels of employment and economic activity by yearend. Really? We are not so sure.  The economy…

Published

on

“Employment will bounce back to pre-pandemic levels by December 31st, 2021.” – Bank of America

Popular forecasts call for a return to pre-pandemic levels of employment and economic activity by yearend. Really? We are not so sure.  The economy lost over 22M jobs between February 2020 and today. The recovery has gained 12M jobs leaving a deficit of 10.7M jobs to replace. This post evaluates trends in employment, hiring, and worker job concerns to determine if this robust forecast to gain 10.7M jobs in 11 months is likely. We begin with a review of automation and job growth at the corporate level from an executive perspective. Next is a look at the worker perspective, a review of automation in various industries, an examination of small business hiring, and an outline of entrepreneur activity. Finally, we offer an outlook for total employment and ideas for sustainable job growth.

Executives Focus On Cutting Costs and Staff

As the pandemic rages on, executives are laser-focused on increasing productivity, reducing costs, and implementing programs to reduce staff. The pandemic accelerates the trend toward automation and staff reductions.  Executive searches for artificial intelligence, automation software, and new business process robotics grew by 5 – 15 % in 2020. Workers in the office or plant require social distancing, desks spaced 6 feet apart, plastic separator sheeting, continuous surface disinfecting,  and periodic temperature testing.  Implementing these pandemic office changes is expensive.

As one COO at a global manufacturer declared, “bringing workers back during the pandemic is expensive, we have to cut costs, I can get 10x – 20x return on automation investments instead.” An October 2020 World Economic Forum survey global executives and found that 43% planned staff reductions.  Executives are busy hiring new leaders for automation deployments. Gartner Group reports that S & P 100 companies will employ 20% more automation architects in 2021 than last year, and 90 % of companies will be hiring  automation experts by 2025.

Automation Goes Beyond Repetitive Task Replacement to ‘Digital Assistants’

Manufacturing companies have deployed automation systems for the past 20 years achieving lower cost and productivity improvements.  Automation reduced the need for hiring workers as well. A Federal Reserve survey showed that U.S. manufacturers had increased output by 20% in 2018 with the same number of workers employed in 2000.

Now automation of knowledge worker jobs is beginning to take hold in financial and services-based businesses.  In the past year, corporations are investing heavily in Robotic Process Automation (RPA) software that supports ‘machine learning,’ artificial intelligence, and business process automation.  New RPA software packages enable non-programming workers to build programs that create ‘digital assistants’ for their job. Enabling workers close to the business process to be automated reduces time to implement and takes the programming load off central IT departments. To counter the need for hiring more software and information services professionals, companies install RPA software. Thus, even ‘secure’ information services jobs may be at risk due to smart software.

A CNBC survey found 37% of workers, 18- 24 years old, were worried about their job replacement by artificial intelligence systems in the next five years. A national average of 27% of all workers was concerned about losing their jobs due to artificial intelligence.

Source: CNBC – 11/7/19

Most early-career workers are internet fluent and know software systems’ capabilities to replace their jobs, says Dan Schwabel, Director of Research for Future Workplace. As they use systems like Siri and Alexa and begin programming, they realize that a smart software service could do their job in the not too distant future.

Workers Across Many Sectors Are Concerned About Automation Job Elimination

The following chart shows 45% of Advertising and Marketing workers to 33% of staff in Insurance are concerned with robots and AI eliminating their jobs.

Source: CNBC – 11/7/19

The pandemic has caused a pause in hiring with workers furloughed or others working remotely.  This pause provides managers with the opportunity to explore new ways to automate labor-intensive tasks. Simultaneously, it offers a chance to deploy AI tests to see how robots can do some knowledge workers’ tasks.

In advertising, creative work producing ad content will be challenging to automate.  But, smart software systems can make ad placement, client management, and reporting more efficient and customer responsive.  Accounting and back-office repetitive tasks and customer communication can all be managed by intelligent services. In transportation, Tesla and other electric vehicle manufacturers are building autonomous delivery trucks.  Farmers use computer-based weather systems synchronized with watering system controls to add intelligence to crop growing and management. The Pennsylvania Turnpike laid off 500 toll booth workers and replaced them with computer automated toll taking machines.

Small Business Hiring Continues To Decline

Small businesses in core cities like San Francisco and New York have seen 33 – 60% declines in revenues as lockdowns in December and January almost completely shut down sales.  Restaurants survived by offering takeout food for pickup but still experience sales losses of 50% more.

Small businesses nationwide report a drop in employment of 30%. And, a lack of commuters in many major cities of 75 – 80% has caused owners to close and furlough employees until commuter traffic returns.  In the following chart from Homebase, hiring increased into the fall but since has fallen off.

Sources: Homebase, The Daily Shot – 1/21/21

Small businesses employed 60.6M workers in 2020.  With 30% fewer employees, a possible 18.1M small business workers are permanently or temporarily unemployed.  Many restaurants’ closing has caused significant layoffs in the restaurant and bar industry and executives plan on not rehiring 35% of their employees in 2021.

The good news is the pandemic has triggered a new wave of entrepreneurship across the country. Employees and owners of businesses that were closed are the primary founders of many of these new businesses.

Entrepreneurs Are Creating New Jobs

The Census Department reports 4.4M new businesses started in 2020, for a yearly increase of 900k new firms over 2019. Cooks laid off by restaurants are starting their own takeout food businesses.  Daycare workers laid off with a talent for pastry making are running dessert take out businesses.

Women owned 47% of all small businesses in 2019, according to a report by American Express. But, the U.S. Chamber of Commerce reports that only 47% of female-owned small businesses owned by women reported business was ‘good’ compared to 62% of male-owned companies. So, when the pandemic forced small businesses to close, women were more likely than men to return home.   Women entrepreneurs are pivoting their businesses quickly. A female personal fitness studio owner had just opened a studio last March. When business lockdowns were declared, she shifted her business to virtual sessions and successfully built a customer base. She now has over 100 participants in each virtual session of 4 sessions per day.

Women laid off in many services businesses or who left companies to take care of children at home have started various home-based businesses. One Macy’s store clerk let go last April started a wig business now grossing enough to pay her rent per month in the Bronx. LinkedIn found the number of women who changed their job title to ‘founder’ from a worker role had doubled in the 4th quarter of 2020. However, an analysis by the Women’s National Law Center of Bureau of Labor Statistics shows that 6M women have lost jobs since February of last year.  So, it’s not clear that all the new businesses started by women will create enough jobs to make up the female jobs deficit.

Manufacturers Are Hiring Too

Orders for products were continuing to grow as manufacturers try to keep up with demand.  The pandemic has forced some manufacturers to shift managers into factory floor roles. These managers fill in for workers out due to illness, taking care of children, or just anxious about returning to the factory floor.  There were over 500k new job openings in manufacturing for last December.

Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics – 1/22/21

The irony is that with millions on unemployment, these positions should be quickly filled. Yet, manufacturers often compete with fulfillment and warehousing companies for workers. Amazon is hiring 100,000 new workers over the next year to support its surging ecommerce business. Companies are asking employees to work on multiple shifts to handle the additional production volume.  The following graph shows hours worked have returned to near pre-pandemic levels while the number of workers has leveled off at – 5%.

Sources: The Wall Street Journal, St. Louis Federal Reserve – 1/9/21

Companies are raising wages as one Wisconsin manufacturer found they could not get workers to come onto the factory floor for $11.00 @hr. So the firm raised entry-level wages to $15.00 @hr.  A generator producer in Ohio has added a shift overnight so workers with school-age children. The overnight shift allowed workers to be home during the day to assist their children with online learning.

The Number of Permanently Laid Off Workers Is Increasing

While temporary layoffs have declined significantly, the number of permanent job losers has continued to climb.  The number of claimants for continuing unemployment benefits jumped by 2.5M for the week of January 23rd to 20.4M as the extended benefits bill from Congress enabled states to offer longer-term payments. The 20.4M level of continuing claims is 10 times the rate for 1 year ago before lockdowns! Another major concern, workers unemployed for greater than 27 weeks has increased to 39.5% of total jobless workers.

Sources: Federal Reserve of St. Louis, Bureau of Labor Statistics, The Daily Shot  – 2/5/21

The following  chart shows that job searches for new positions have spiraled down as job prospects dimmed in January. Further, searches continue to decline since a peak right at the onset of the pandemic last March.  Search activity in all major sectors consumer, industrial, real estate, services  and transportation fell in January.

Sources: Google Trends, Arbor Research, The Daily Shot – 2/9/21

Indeed reports that job opening listings are now .7% higher than in February of 2020. The Labor Department announced 6.6M job openings for January holding steady from December of 2020. There is a significant mismatch of skills  of millions of unemployed workers and millions of information services and factory job openings.

The continuing growth of permanently laid-off workers is a challenge to build a strong foundation for an economic recovery. If workers are not working, they are saving what money they have and not increasing discretionary spending. There is an urgent need for a significant job development and training program for unemployed workers to fill millions of open jobs. On February 10th, Fed Chairman Jay Powell told the New York Economic Club that a national jobs strategy and program is the top priority for the recovery.

Workers Are Still Worried About Employment & No Raises

The Bloomberg Consumer Comfort index shows consumers’ comfort about the future economy is 20 points below their confidence level at the pre-pandemic level.

Sources: Bloomberg, The Daily Shot – 1/21/21

The future employment component of the Comfort Index has consistently been declining over the past several months.

Only 15%  of small businesses are planning on offering their workers raises in the next six months. Worse yet, nationally, few consumers have confidence they will receive a raise in the next six months

Sources: Refinitiv Datastream, TS Lombard, NFIB, Conference Board, The Daily Shot – 2/1/21

Employment Growth Is Stalled – Yet There Are Growth Opportunities 

The labor market for January stalled, as this chart shows there were only 49k new jobs and job losses in December, 202 were revised upward to 227k.

Sources: Panetheon Macroeconomics, The Daily Shot – 2/5/21

Countering the loss of jobs in services, hospitality, and small business are the millions of startup companies founded by innovative entrepreneurs.

We have noted the massive mismatch between job openings and the skills of the unemployed. To overcome the skills deficit, the Biden administration has proposed a Clean Air & Jobs Act Proposal for 10M new jobs by investing in climate projects and infrastructure for the economy. The proposal includes Job training, career development, and placement programs.  The initiative comes with a $2T price tag.  It will be interesting to see if the program will pass a divided Congress.  It seems like the most likely bill to pass will be about $1.2T.

Will Job Creation Overcome Permanent Unemployment Drag?

Growth in manufacturing job openings is helpful, yet manufacturing accounts for only 9% of all employment.  A major challenge is the mixed picture in services sectors where information systems seems to be the only growth sector.

Plus, with 50% of S & P 500 companies reporting sales of -.54% in the 4th Quarter 2020, executives’ reluctance to hire will harden.   As we noted in our post Catch 22 – Employee & Executives, both sides of the employment equation will be monitoring each other.  Each side is waiting for the other to make a major move in either hiring or spending. But, executives hold the power to hire and will wait for consistent sales over a quarter or two.  The first indication that hiring is improving is growth in temporary employment with full time hiring to follow. In January, there was an increase of 80k temporary jobs.  Monitoring hiring of temporary worker over the quarter will tell us more about a possible shift in labor demand.

The ‘Bounce Back’ In Employment Is Likely To Take 2-3 Years 

The workplace has experienced a once in 100 years shock. The virus attack shattered traditional worker, and executive assumptions about how and where work is done. Executives are now deploying new work systems, processes, and measures that increase productivity and reduce staffing.    Job growth efforts face significant headwinds from virus-driven lockdowns. Lockdowns continue in most states, with corporations extending work from home policies until the end of 2021. Delayed vaccination programs have stalled the phasing out of lockdown programs.

At the earliest, the CDC does not expect ‘herd immunity’ until late summer of 2021.  Thus, opening the economy will be a slow process over the summer into the fall. The narrative that employment will ‘bounce back’ by the 2nd half of 2021 to February, 2020 levels is unlikely. Employment back to pre-pandemic levels is more likely to take 2-3 years after worries of virus infection have disappeared. When employment is growing at robust levels consumers will spend again..  Entrepreneurs starting new businesses will fuel job creation but face significant headwinds from a stagnant economy.

We Need Entrepreneurship, Productive Investments  & Trade For A Growing Economy 

Consumers anxious about their jobs will continue to save, not spend except on essentials. Their lack of spending will delay hiring and economic growth beyond the end of the pandemic. A return to a growth economy will require consumers to spend, executives to hire, and normal mobility patterns to resume.  All these factors will take time to build against the overhang of federal debt, corporate debt, and housing debt.  A return to solid entrepreneurship, a focus on productive investments, and the renewal of robust international trade are ways to build a growing economy.


Patrick Hill is the Editor of The Progressive Ensign, https://theprogressiveensign.com/ writes from the heart of Silicon Valley, leveraging 20 years of experience as an executive at firms like H.P., Genentech, Verigy, Informatica, and Okta to provide investment and economic insights. Twitter: @PatrickHill1677, email: patrickhill@theprogressiveensign.com

The post Will The Economy Replace Ten Million Jobs By 2022? appeared first on RIA.

Read More

Continue Reading

International

TikTok Ban Obscures Chinese Stock Gold Rush

No one wants to invest in China right now. The country’s stock market is teetering on the brink of collapse. And it is about to lose its biggest foothold…

Published

on

No one wants to invest in China right now.

The country’s stock market is teetering on the brink of collapse.

And it is about to lose its biggest foothold in America — TikTok.

Yet, beneath its crumbling economy, military weather balloons and blatant propaganda tools lie some epic opportunities…

…if you have the stomach and the knowledge.

Because as Jim Woods wrote in his newsletter last month:

“China has been so battered for so long, that there is a lot of deep value here for the ‘blood in the ‘’red’’ streets’ investors.”

And boy was he right.

However, this battle-tested veteran didn’t recommend buying individual Chinese stocks.

He was more interested in the exchange-traded funds (ETFs) like the CHIQ.

And here’s why…

Predictable Manipulation

China’s heavy-handed approach creates gaping economic inefficiencies.

When markets falter, President Xi calls on his “national team” to prop up prices.

$17 billion flowed into index-tracking funds in January as the Hang Sang fell over 13% while the CSI dropped over 7%.

Jim Woods saw this coming from a mile away.

In late February, he highlighted the Chinese ETF CHIQ in late February, which has rallied rather nicely since then.

This ETF focuses on the Chinese consumer, a recent passion project for the central government.

You see, around 2018, when President Xi decided to smother his own economy, notable shifts were already taking place.

The once burgeoning retail market had slowed markedly. Developers left cities abandoned, including weird copies of Paris (Tianducheng) and England.

Source: Shutterstock

So, Xi and co. shifted the focus to the consumer… which went terribly.

For starters, a lot of the consumer wealth was tied up in real estate.

Then you had a growing population of unemployed younger adults who didn’t have any money to spend.

Once the pandemic hit, everything collapsed.

That’s why it took China far longer to recover even a sliver of its former economy.

While it’s not the growth engine of the early 2000s, the old girl still has some life left in it.

As Jim pointed out, China’s consumer spending rebounded nicely in Q4 2023.

Source: National Bureau of Statistics of China

Combined with looser central bank policy, it was only a matter of time before Chinese stocks caught a lift.

The resurgence may be largely tied to China’s desire to travel. After all, its people have been cooped up longer than any other country.

But make no mistake, this doesn’t make China a long-term investment.

Beyond what most people understand about China’s politics, there’s a little-known fact about how they treat foreign investors.

Money in. Nothing out.

When we buy a stock, we’re taking partial ownership in that company. This entitles us to a portion of the profits (or assets).

That doesn’t happen with Chinese companies.

American depository receipts (ADRs) aren’t actual shares of a company. It’s a note that the intermediary ties to shares of the company they own overseas.

So, we can only own Chinese companies indirectly.

But there’s another key feature you probably weren’t aware of.

Many of the Chinese companies we, as Americans invest in, don’t pay dividends. In fact, a much smaller percentage of Chinese companies pay any dividends.

Alibaba is a perfect example.

Despite generating billions of dollars in cash every year, it doesn’t pay dividends.

What do its managers do with the money?

Other than squirreling away $80 billion on its balance sheets, they do share buybacks.

Plenty of investors will tell you that’s even better than dividends.

But you have no legal ownership rights in China. So, what is that ADR in reality?

We’d argue nothing but paper profits at best, and air at worst.

That’s why it’s flat-out dangerous to own shares of individual Chinese companies long-term.

Any one of them can be nationalized at any moment.

Chinese ETFs reduce that risk through diversification, similar to junk bond funds.

Short of an all-out ban, like between the United States and Russia, the majority of the ETF holdings should remain intact.

Opportunistic Investing

If China is so unstable, and capable of changing at a moment’s notice, how can investors uncover pockets of value?

As Jim showed with his ETF selection, you can have some sector or thematic idea so long as you have the data to support it.

China, like any large institution, isn’t going to change its broad economic policies overnight.

As long as you study the general movements of the government, you can steer clear of the catastrophic zones and towards the diamond caves.

Because when things look THIS bad, you know the opportunities are even juicier.

But rather than try to run this maze solo, take this opportunity to check out Jim Woods’ latest report on China.

In it, he details the broad economic themes driving the Chinese government, and how to exploit them for gain.

Click here to explore Jim Woods’ report.

The post TikTok Ban Obscures Chinese Stock Gold Rush appeared first on Stock Investor.

Read More

Continue Reading

International

The Great Escape… of UK Unemployment Reporting

https://bondvigilantes.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/1-the-great-escape-of-uk-unemployment-reporting-1024×576.pngThe Bank of England Monetary Policy Committee…

Published

on

https://bondvigilantes.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/1-the-great-escape-of-uk-unemployment-reporting-1024x576.png

The Bank of England Monetary Policy Committee potentially has a problem: it requires data to make its labour market forecasts and assessments, but the unemployment statistics have become increasingly unreliable. This is because the Labour Force Survey participation rate (on which the unemployment figures are based) has fallen below 50% since 2018 and has been as low as 15% recently[1]. What is the solution to this difficult measurement problem? An answer can be found in the classic war film, The Great Escape.

In 1943, the Escape Committee of Stalag Luft III was tasked with digging a tunnel to freedom. Unfortunately, they had a problem. They needed to measure the distance between one of the prisoner’s huts and the forest beyond the prison perimeter, but they had no reliable tools to measure this critical variable. Fortunately they had two mathematicians within the group who came up with a method to gauge the distance to the forest so that the tunnel would be long enough to ensure escape without detection. The idea was to eyeball the distance using a 20 foot tree for scale (the tree was the one ‘accurate’ measurement around which they could work with). They got individual prisoners to gauge the distance from the hut to the tree and then averaged all of the estimates. The critical distance measure was therefore the average of a large sample size of guesstimates. Fortunately, it more or less worked. Happily, modern economists have an equivalent to rely on in the area of unemployment. Their version of the Stalag Luft III tree strategy is something called the Beveridge Curve.

The Beveridge Curve is simply an observed relationship between an economy’s unemployment rate and its job vacancy rate at the same point in time. An excellent exposition can be found in the Bond Vigilantes archive[2]. When you plot the two variables against one another over a given period, the data points disclose a curve. This curve shows us that when unemployment increases, job vacancies decrease and vice versa. I have plotted the current curve below using the available data from the Office for National Statistics (ONS)[3]. The bottom left quadrant of the graph (the blue dots) relate to the Covid-19 era and the top left quadrant (the purple dots) represent the last 2 years’ worth of data. The green dots represent the remaining data from July 2004 to June 2023.


Source: Office for National Statistics, Dataset JP9Z & UNEM


Source: Office for National Statistics, Dataset JP9Z & UNEM

From these charts and new data from the ONS, we can observe that in the UK, the level of unemployment is increasing and that the job vacancy rate is decreasing. At face value, this suggests that current Bank of England monetary policy is working and that the inflation rate is slowing as the economy cools. One could argue that we are on track for a reasonably soft landing. Nothing new so far.

Things become more interesting when we consider the Beveridge Curve in conjunction with the most recent job vacancy data. We are told that there are now 814,000 job vacancies as of the 31st December 2023[4]. Ordinarily, we would use the curve and clearly be able to extrapolate from the Job Vacancy data what our Unemployment figure might be. However, we also know that the current unemployment data is unreliable, which makes this harder. Using our model inclusive of data oddities, we could extrapolate that with 814,000 job vacancies, we might expect an unemployment rate of around 3.5%. Yet, we know that our unemployment figures are unreliable so the question therefore is, how big an increase in unemployment are we likely to see given what we know about job vacancies?

In order to estimate the magnitude of the rise in unemployment, we need to look further afield. If we study the levels of economic inactivity in the UK, we can observe that they have remained stationary at 22%[5] for the last decade. We can also see that the population of the UK has risen over the same period by around 5.91%[6]. Further, we know that the Labour Force Survey (LFS) samples 40,000 households per quarter to obtain its data, but of late has had a response rate of only 15% (6,000 households). Therefore a critical question for policy makers is what is happening with the 85%, the non-responders?

Given the small sample size, it is entirely possible that the LFS suffered survey bias that is being erroneously weighted away. In other words, the LFS compensates for the paucity of response data by accessing other regional population statistics as a legitimate part of their methodology. The problems of non-responders are being addressed in upcoming LFS releases but for the time being, the data is not as clear as it ought to be. With such a small sample size, it seems possible – indeed probable –  that unemployment levels are being underreported. This would explain why the current unemployment rate of 3.8%[7] is dramatically lower than the historic average of 6.7% (1971-2023). We see further evidence for this in the forecasts of the UK’s unemployment rate on Bloomberg which have been consistently above the actual levels for the last few published data points. So whilst the published headline figures might be looking reasonable, the underlying story looks like it could be hiding something more sinister.

Through it all, the Beveridge Curve remains a reasonable template. Job vacancies are definitely falling, so we should expect to see unemployment rising. Like the Stalag Luft III measurement solution, the Beveridge Curve offers a constructive way out of our present statistical dilemma. That being said, analogies can only be taken so far. Unfortunately for the inmates of Stalag Luft III, the calculation didn’t quite work and the tunnel came up short. No one actually made a Great Escape. What does this mean for UK unemployment data? Time may tell.

[1] The UK’s ‘official’ labour data is becoming a nonsense (harvard.edu)

[2] https://bondvigilantes.com/blog/2013/11/a-shifting-beveridge-curve-does-the-us-have-a-long-term-structural-unemployment-problem/

[3] Unemployment – Office for National Statistics (ons.gov.uk)

[4] https://www.ons.gov.uk/employmentandlabourmarket/peopleinwork/employmentandemployeetypes/timeseries/jp9z/unem

[5] https://www.ethnicity-facts-figures.service.gov.uk/work-pay-and-benefits/unemployment-and-economic-inactivity/economic-inactivity/latest/#:~:text=data%20shows%20that%3A-,22%25%20of%20working%20age%20people%20in%20England%2C%20Scotland%20and%20Wales,for%20a%20job)%20in%202022

[6] https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/populationandmigration/populationestimates/bulletins/annualmidyearpopulationestimates/mid2021

[7] https://www.ons.gov.uk/employmentandlabourmarket/peoplenotinwork/unemployment

Read More

Continue Reading

International

Germany Is Running Out Of Money And Debt Levels Are Exploding, Finance Minister Warns

Germany Is Running Out Of Money And Debt Levels Are Exploding, Finance Minister Warns

By John Cody of Remix News

German Finance Minister…

Published

on

Germany Is Running Out Of Money And Debt Levels Are Exploding, Finance Minister Warns

By John Cody of Remix News

German Finance Minister Christian Lindner is warning his own government that state finances are quickly growing out of hand, and the government needs to change course and implement austerity measures. However, the dispute over spending is only expected to escalate, with budget shortfalls causing open clashes among the three-way left-liberal coalition running the country.

With negotiations kicking off for the 2025 budget, much is at stake. However, the picture has been complicated after the country’s top court ruled that the government could not shift €60 billion in money earmarked for the coronavirus crisis to other areas of the budget, with the court noting that the move was unconstitutional.

Since then, the government has been in crisis mode, and sought to cut the budget in a number of areas, including against the country’s farmers. Those cuts already sparked mass protests, showcasing how delicate the situation remains for the government.

German Finance Minister Christian Lindner attends the cabinet meeting of the German government at the chancellery in Berlin, Germany. (AP Photo/Markus Schreiber)

Lindner, whose party has taken a beating in the polls, is desperate to create some distance from his coalition partners and save his party from electoral disaster. The finance minster says the financial picture facing Germany is dire, and that the budget shortfall will only grow in the coming years if measures are not taken to rein in spending.

“In an unfavorable scenario, the increasing financing deficits lead to an increase in debt in relation to economic output to around 345 percent in the long term,” reads the Sustainability Report released by his office. “In a favorable scenario, the rate will rise to around 140 percent of gross domestic product by 2070.”

Under EU law, Germany has limited its debt levels to 60 percent of economic output, which requires dramatic savings. A huge factor is Germany’s rapidly aging population, with a debt explosion on the horizon as more and more citizens head into retirement while tax revenues shrink and the social welfare system grows — in part due to the country’s exploding immigrant population.

Lindner’s partners, the Greens and Social Democrats (SPD), are loath to cut spending further, as this will harm their electoral chances. In fact, Labor Minister Hubertus Heil is pushing for a new pension package that will add billions to the country’s debt, which remarkably, Lindner also supports.

Continue reading at rmx.news

Tyler Durden Mon, 03/18/2024 - 05:00

Read More

Continue Reading

Trending