Connect with us

What Stocks To Buy Today? 4 Dividend Stocks To Watch In July 2021

These are some of 2021’s best dividend stocks for easier income planning.
The post What Stocks To Buy Today? 4 Dividend Stocks To Watch In July 2021 appeared first on Stock Market News, Quotes, Charts and Financial Information | StockMarket.com.

Published

on

Check Out These Top Dividend Stocks In The Stock Market Today

Amidst the volatility seen in the stock market recently, more investors could be turning towards dividend stocks. You see, it’s easy to forget about dividend stocks in a bullish market. After all, what’s the deal with a 10% annual dividend yield when some of the top growth stocks could achieve that in a matter of days. However, investors who want to hold less volatile assets that could survive a stock market downturn may find dividend stocks appealing.

For investors who want a passive income every month, you might want to take a look at some of the best monthly dividend stocks to buy. For instance, Realty Income (NYSE: O) probably tops the list as it has made 611 monthly dividends consecutively. This steady performance makes it a great staple for an income investor’s portfolio. While a high yield is certainly attractive, the reality is that it could be short-lived. Having said that, if you are still keen on finding the best high yield dividend stocks to buy, there are several other key factors to consider when it comes to dividend investing. 

For starters, companies that focus their resources towards dividends could be lagging in terms of growth projects. This would account for slower stock appreciation over time but provide more predictable income overall. Next, the company’s dividend-paying history would also be another aspect to consider. In this case, consistency and steady increments in a company’s dividends would be important to look out for. To put it simply, income investors want the highest yield possible with the least risk. With all that in mind, here is a list of some of the best dividend stocks that might do just that in the stock market today.

Top Dividend Stocks To Buy [Or Avoid] Right Now

Annaly Capital Management

First up the list is mortgage real estate investment trust (mREIT) Annaly Capital Management. It’s no secret that REITs in general have high dividend yields, but NLY stock is one top dividend stock that not only produces high yield, but is also quite safe and manageable. Why is that? Well, an mREIT doesn’t invest in real property. Instead, it invests in real estate debt, and the mortgages from Analy are guaranteed by the federal government. Essentially, this means that the company takes limited credit risk and is less likely to default, which makes it a sound investment. 

Annaly currently has a dividend yield of nearly 10%. For most other industries, any dividend yield near this level is a red flag. But in Annaly’s case, it is a high yield that is not short-lived. In fact, it has averaged out about 10% yield for more than two decades. Sure, NLY stock suffered a massive drop at the height of the pandemic, and that’s to be expected. Now, with its business improving significantly in the latest quarter, investors can safely rely on Annaly Capital to keep producing great returns while maintaining a decent payout. 

top dividend stocks (NLY stock)
Source: TD Ameritrade TOS

Read More

Clorox

Clorox has certainly benefited from the pandemic hoarding. The consumer staple stock which usually sounds rather dull in a growth-oriented market finds itself in a sweet spot in the stock market. Many consumers rushed to stock up on its disinfecting wipes. After all, the public was cautious about contracting the virus and therefore wanted to be squeaky clean. If anything, the pandemic helped propel Clorox’s sales to record highs. 

The company’s dividend yield stands at 5% as of late. Clorox is also one of those companies that have been boosting its payout annually for the past four decades. As impressive as it may seem, investors have left Clorox stock on worries that there might be a pullback as the COVID-19 threat fades. Without sounding too pessimistic on the pandemic situation, with new variants emerging from time to time, the demand for cleaning and disinfecting supplies is likely to stay for some time. Considering all these, would you agree that CLX stock is a top dividend stock to buy right now?

best dividend stocks (CLX stock)
Source: TD Ameritrade TOS

[Read More] Top Stocks To Watch Today? 4 Tech Stocks To Consider

AbbVie

AbbVie is a biotech company focusing on the discovery and development of innovative medicines. The likes of which aim to impact a wide array of therapeutic areas across AbbVie’s portfolio. These include but are not limited to the fields of immunology, oncology, virology, neuroscience, and eye care. Across its current portfolio, AbbVie currently markets and distributes over 32 drugs in the U.S. Given the scale and variety of AbbVie’s work, ABBV stock could be a go-to for biotech investors today.

AbbVie currently has a dividend yield of 4.5%. The company has been gathering a lot of investor’s attention recently as the company continues to make tremendous breakthroughs. For the uninitiated, AbbVie recently revealed that its treatment for ulcerative colitis, upadacitinib, met all of its primary and secondary endpoints set in a one-year-long Phase 3 study. According to AbbVie vice-chairman Michael Severino, the results demonstrate the drug’s potential as a treatment option for patients with moderate to severe ulcerative colitis. As AbbVie continues to expand its offerings, would you consider adding ABBV stock to your watchlist?

high dividend stocks (ABBV stock)
Source: TD Ameritrade TOS

[Read More] 4 Artificial Intelligence Stocks To Watch Right Now

Chevron

With oil prices briefly hitting a six-year high after OPEC fails to get a deal, things may be looking up for energy stocks like Chevron Corporation. Many investors, including Warren Buffett, love CVX stock because it has a strong balance sheet and good growth prospects. Although the energy sector isn’t in its heyday anymore, Chevron has got a few tricks up its sleeves. The company is also keeping up with the times through its initiatives in hydrogen to support the green economy.

The oil giant currently has an attractive dividend yield of 5.17% and its most recent hike was announced earlier this month. The company’s credibility as a top dividend stock lies in the track record of its payout. It has increased its payout for the past 34 consecutive years. Chevron is one option to consider if you are looking for a relatively low-risk investment in the energy sector. With one of the strongest balance sheets among its industry peers, investors may feel safer investing in it. After all, the oil and gas sector isn’t the shiniest investment you can get in the stock market today. Considering its diversified businesses and a reasonable valuation, would you invest in CVX stock?

best dividend stocks to buy (CVX stock)
Source: TD Ameritrade TOS

The post What Stocks To Buy Today? 4 Dividend Stocks To Watch In July 2021 appeared first on Stock Market News, Quotes, Charts and Financial Information | StockMarket.com.

Read More

Continue Reading

Uncategorized

Southwest and United Airlines have bad news for passengers

Both airlines are facing the same problem, one that could lead to higher airfares and fewer flight options.

Published

on

Airlines operate in a market that's dictated by supply and demand: If more people want to fly a specific route than there are available seats, then tickets on those flights cost more.

That makes scheduling and predicting demand a huge part of maximizing revenue for airlines. There are, however, numerous factors that go into how airlines decide which flights to put on the schedule.

Related: Major airline faces Chapter 11 bankruptcy concerns

Every airport has only a certain number of gates, flight slots and runway capacity, limiting carriers' flexibility. That's why during times of high demand — like flights to Las Vegas during Super Bowl week — do not usually translate to airlines sending more planes to and from that destination.

Airlines generally do try to add capacity every year. That's become challenging as Boeing has struggled to keep up with demand for new airplanes. If you can't add airplanes, you can't grow your business. That's caused problems for the entire industry. 

Every airline retires planes each year. In general, those get replaced by newer, better models that offer more efficiency and, in most cases, better passenger amenities. 

If an airline can't get the planes it had hoped to add to its fleet in a given year, it can face capacity problems. And it's a problem that both Southwest Airlines (LUV) and United Airlines have addressed in a way that's inevitable but bad for passengers. 

Southwest Airlines has not been able to get the airplanes it had hoped to.

Image source: Kevin Dietsch/Getty Images

Southwest slows down its pilot hiring

In 2023, Southwest made a huge push to hire pilots. The airline lost thousands of pilots to retirement during the covid pandemic and it needed to replace them in order to build back to its 2019 capacity.

The airline successfully did that but will not continue that trend in 2024.

"Southwest plans to hire approximately 350 pilots this year, and no new-hire classes are scheduled after this month," Travel Weekly reported. "Last year, Southwest hired 1,916 pilots, according to pilot recruitment advisory firm Future & Active Pilot Advisors. The airline hired 1,140 pilots in 2022." 

The slowdown in hiring directly relates to the airline expecting to grow capacity only in the low-single-digits percent in 2024.

"Moving into 2024, there is continued uncertainty around the timing of expected Boeing deliveries and the certification of the Max 7 aircraft. Our fleet plans remain nimble and currently differs from our contractual order book with Boeing," Southwest Airlines Chief Financial Officer Tammy Romo said during the airline's fourth-quarter-earnings call

"We are planning for 79 aircraft deliveries this year and expect to retire roughly 45 700 and 4 800, resulting in a net expected increase of 30 aircraft this year."

That's very modest growth, which should not be enough of an increase in capacity to lower prices in any significant way.

United Airlines pauses pilot hiring

Boeing's  (BA)  struggles have had wide impact across the industry. United Airlines has also said it was going to pause hiring new pilots through the end of May.

United  (UAL)  Fight Operations Vice President Marc Champion explained the situation in a memo to the airline's staff.

"As you know, United has hundreds of new planes on order, and while we remain on path to be the fastest-growing airline in the industry, we just won't grow as fast as we thought we would in 2024 due to continued delays at Boeing," he said.

"For example, we had contractual deliveries for 80 Max 10s this year alone, but those aircraft aren't even certified yet, and it's impossible to know when they will arrive." 

That's another blow to consumers hoping that multiple major carriers would grow capacity, putting pressure on fares. Until Boeing can get back on track, it's unlikely that competition between the large airlines will lead to lower fares.  

In fact, it's possible that consumer demand will grow more than airline capacity which could push prices higher.

Related: Veteran fund manager picks favorite stocks for 2024

Read More

Continue Reading

Uncategorized

Simple blood test could predict risk of long-term COVID-19 lung problems

UVA Health researchers have discovered a potential way to predict which patients with severe COVID-19 are likely to recover well and which are likely to…

Published

on

UVA Health researchers have discovered a potential way to predict which patients with severe COVID-19 are likely to recover well and which are likely to suffer “long-haul” lung problems. That finding could help doctors better personalize treatments for individual patients.

Credit: UVA Health

UVA Health researchers have discovered a potential way to predict which patients with severe COVID-19 are likely to recover well and which are likely to suffer “long-haul” lung problems. That finding could help doctors better personalize treatments for individual patients.

UVA’s new research also alleviates concerns that severe COVID-19 could trigger relentless, ongoing lung scarring akin to the chronic lung disease known as idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, the researchers report. That type of continuing lung damage would mean that patients’ ability to breathe would continue to worsen over time.

“We are excited to find that people with long-haul COVID have an immune system that is totally different from people who have lung scarring that doesn’t stop,” said researcher Catherine A. Bonham, MD, a pulmonary and critical care expert who serves as scientific director of UVA Health’s Interstitial Lung Disease Program. “This offers hope that even patients with the worst COVID do not have progressive scarring of the lung that leads to death.”

Long-Haul COVID-19

Up to 30% of patients hospitalized with severe COVID-19 continue to suffer persistent symptoms months after recovering from the virus. Many of these patients develop lung scarring – some early on in their hospitalization, and others within six months of their initial illness, prior research has found. Bonham and her collaborators wanted to better understand why this scarring occurs, to determine if it is similar to progressive pulmonary fibrosis and to see if there is a way to identify patients at risk.

To do this, the researchers followed 16 UVA Health patients who had survived severe COVID-19. Fourteen had been hospitalized and placed on a ventilator. All continued to have trouble breathing and suffered fatigue and abnormal lung function at their first outpatient checkup.

After six months, the researchers found that the patients could be divided into two groups: One group’s lung health improved, prompting the researchers to label them “early resolvers,” while the other group, dubbed “late resolvers,” continued to suffer lung problems and pulmonary fibrosis. 

Looking at blood samples taken before the patients’ recovery began to diverge, the UVA team found that the late resolvers had significantly fewer immune cells known as monocytes circulating in their blood. These white blood cells play a critical role in our ability to fend off disease, and the cells were abnormally depleted in patients who continued to suffer lung problems compared both to those who recovered and healthy control subjects. 

Further, the decrease in monocytes correlated with the severity of the patients’ ongoing symptoms. That suggests that doctors may be able to use a simple blood test to identify patients likely to become long-haulers — and to improve their care.

“About half of the patients we examined still had lingering, bothersome symptoms and abnormal tests after six months,” Bonham said. “We were able to detect differences in their blood from the first visit, with fewer blood monocytes mapping to lower lung function.”

The researchers also wanted to determine if severe COVID-19 could cause progressive lung scarring as in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. They found that the two conditions had very different effects on immune cells, suggesting that even when the symptoms were similar, the underlying causes were very different. This held true even in patients with the most persistent long-haul COVID-19 symptoms. “Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis is progressive and kills patients within three to five years,” Bonham said. “It was a relief to see that all our COVID patients, even those with long-haul symptoms, were not similar.”

Because of the small numbers of participants in UVA’s study, and because they were mostly male (for easier comparison with IPF, a disease that strikes mostly men), the researchers say larger, multi-center studies are needed to bear out the findings. But they are hopeful that their new discovery will provide doctors a useful tool to identify COVID-19 patients at risk for long-haul lung problems and help guide them to recovery.

“We are only beginning to understand the biology of how the immune system impacts pulmonary fibrosis,” Bonham said. “My team and I were humbled and grateful to work with the outstanding patients who made this study possible.” 

Findings Published

The researchers have published their findings in the scientific journal Frontiers in Immunology. The research team consisted of Grace C. Bingham, Lyndsey M. Muehling, Chaofan Li, Yong Huang, Shwu-Fan Ma, Daniel Abebayehu, Imre Noth, Jie Sun, Judith A. Woodfolk, Thomas H. Barker and Bonham. Noth disclosed that he has received personal fees from Boehringer Ingelheim, Genentech and Confo unrelated to the research project. In addition, he has a patent pending related to idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Bonham and all other members of the research team had no financial conflicts to disclose.

The UVA research was supported by the National Institutes of Health, grants R21 AI160334 and U01 AI125056; NIH’s National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute, grants 5K23HL143135-04 and UG3HL145266; UVA’s Engineering in Medicine Seed Fund; the UVA Global Infectious Diseases Institute’s COVID-19 Rapid Response; a UVA Robert R. Wagner Fellowship; and a Sture G. Olsson Fellowship in Engineering.

  

To keep up with the latest medical research news from UVA, subscribe to the Making of Medicine blog at http://makingofmedicine.virginia.edu.


Read More

Continue Reading

Government

Looking Back At COVID’s Authoritarian Regimes

After having moved from Canada to the United States, partly to be wealthier and partly to be freer (those two are connected, by the way), I was shocked,…

Published

on

After having moved from Canada to the United States, partly to be wealthier and partly to be freer (those two are connected, by the way), I was shocked, in March 2020, when President Trump and most US governors imposed heavy restrictions on people’s freedom. The purpose, said Trump and his COVID-19 advisers, was to “flatten the curve”: shut down people’s mobility for two weeks so that hospitals could catch up with the expected demand from COVID patients. In her book Silent Invasion, Dr. Deborah Birx, the coordinator of the White House Coronavirus Task Force, admitted that she was scrambling during those two weeks to come up with a reason to extend the lockdowns for much longer. As she put it, “I didn’t have the numbers in front of me yet to make the case for extending it longer, but I had two weeks to get them.” In short, she chose the goal and then tried to find the data to justify the goal. This, by the way, was from someone who, along with her task force colleague Dr. Anthony Fauci, kept talking about the importance of the scientific method. By the end of April 2020, the term “flatten the curve” had all but disappeared from public discussion.

Now that we are four years past that awful time, it makes sense to look back and see whether those heavy restrictions on the lives of people of all ages made sense. I’ll save you the suspense. They didn’t. The damage to the economy was huge. Remember that “the economy” is not a term used to describe a big machine; it’s a shorthand for the trillions of interactions among hundreds of millions of people. The lockdowns and the subsequent federal spending ballooned the budget deficit and consequent federal debt. The effect on children’s learning, not just in school but outside of school, was huge. These effects will be with us for a long time. It’s not as if there wasn’t another way to go. The people who came up with the idea of lockdowns did so on the basis of abstract models that had not been tested. They ignored a model of human behavior, which I’ll call Hayekian, that is tested every day.

These are the opening two paragraphs of my latest Defining Ideas article, “Looking Back at COVID’s Authoritarian Regimes,” Defining Ideas, March 14, 2024.

Another excerpt:

That wasn’t the only uncertainty. My daughter Karen lived in San Francisco and made her living teaching Pilates. San Francisco mayor London Breed shut down all the gyms, and so there went my daughter’s business. (The good news was that she quickly got online and shifted many of her clients to virtual Pilates. But that’s another story.) We tried to see her every six weeks or so, whether that meant our driving up to San Fran or her driving down to Monterey. But were we allowed to drive to see her? In that first month and a half, we simply didn’t know.

Read the whole thing, which is longer than usual.

(0 COMMENTS)

Read More

Continue Reading

Trending