Spread & Containment
Weekly investment update – One central bank, two central banks, three central banks…
Over the last few days, equity markets have bounced back on news of negotiations in the Ukraine conflict. We would not try to predict the outcome of these…

Over the last few days, equity markets have bounced back on news of negotiations in the Ukraine conflict. We would not try to predict the outcome of these talks, but to us, investors appear complacent about the odds of diplomatic success. Anticipating political outcomes is likely a poor strategy for asset allocation decisions in the short term.
On the monetary policy front, sentiment has been dominated by more hawkish policy turns by mjor the European Central Bank (ECB) and the US Federal Reserve (Fed), boosting long-term yields. The Fed has raised policy rates by 25bp while the Bank of England has followed suit with an equal-sized move.
Markets have been anticipating rate rises. Already high inflation seemed set to rise further as a result of the Ukraine war even as economic growth will likely slow.
At the end of 16 March, the yield on the US 10-year T-note stood at 2.18%, up +23bp in one week and +36bp from the end of February. The 10-year German Bund yield had risen to 0.39%, its highest level since mid-November 2018 (see Exhibit 1). Between 9 and 16 March, global equities gained 1.6%, leaving the month-to-date loss at -2.1% (MSCI AC World index in US dollars).
China – A contrarian central bank
While Europe is particularly exposed to this geopolitical crisis, the Omicron BA.1 wave has hit Asia, reminding us that the health crisis is not over. The rise in new cases in China has led to the imposition of strict confinement measures in Shenzhen, a city bordering Hong Kong, and Changchun in the northeast. According to the latest National Health Commission report, 1,952 new non-imported symptomatic cases were identified on 15 March in more than a dozen Chinese provinces and cities.
The authorities are aware of the effects of their zero Covid policy on economic growth and financial markets: the yuan has depreciated, and the CSI 300 Index has fallen to its lowest since June 2020, though there are additional factors behind these moves. Last week’s announcement of an ambitious GDP growth target of 5.5% in 2022, and the emphasis on the importance of ‘stabilising ‘growth, suggest more fiscal and monetary support is to come to offset the drag from the pandemic.
Since January’s key rate cut, the People’s Bank of China (PBoC) has kept banking system liquidity ‘reasonably ample’, but further cuts are now expected. On 16 March, Deputy Prime Minister Liu He hinted at more market-friendly policies, including a softening of regulations, particularly those affecting the tech sector.
Elsewhere, monetary tightening is on the agenda
While the PBoC’s easing stands out, one could argue that the current geopolitical situation and the associated downside risk to growth justify a more cautious approach elsewhere, too.
To date, the ECB has kept its deposit rate at -0.50%, but it did signal earlier this month that the pace at which it will reduce its securities purchases will be more aggressive than suggested before. The PEPP (pandemic emergency purchase programme) is due to run out by the end of the month, while the expansion of the APP (asset purchase programme) will be more limited.
These announcements and comments from the ECB that the first rate increase will occur ‘sometime after’ the end of net purchases of securities have led observers to anticipate that the first hike in rates will come at the end of Q3 or at the beginning of Q4, with the deposit rate returning to 0% by the end of 2022.
While we have now revised down our GDP growth forecast for 2022 (from 4.2% previously to 2.8%) and consider that risks to growth are to the downside while those on inflation are to the upside, we expect a first rise in key rates in December 2022 and further policy normalisation in 2023.
Ensuring greater policy ‘optionality’ by adopting a data-dependent approach could facilitate the ECB’s communication in the coming months and avoid over-interpretations of any changes in tone.
The Fed is more predictable than the ECB
As widely expected, the FOMC (Federal Open Market Committee) meeting on 16 March decided on a 25bp increase in the federal funds target rate. Only St Louis Fed President James Bullard, who over recent weeks had clearly opted for a more hawkish stance, voted for a 50bp rate rise.
The ‘dot plot’, which reflects FOMC thinking on the future rate path, now shows that four rate increases are envisaged in 2022 in addition to those already suggested in last December’s edition, resulting in a median projection of 1.875%. The additional hikes come even as GDP growth was revised down from 4.0% to 2.8% (Q4 year-on-year change). The Fed still expects low unemployment (3.5% at the end of 2022 and 2023, 3.6% at the end of 2024) but above-target inflation (core personal consumption expenditures excluding food and energy price index) at 4.3% in Q4 2022, falling to 2.7% at the end of 2023.

To us the message is clear: Despite the adverse effects of higher inflation on the economy, domestic demand is expected to remain strong in the US in the coming years and GDP growth will be above-potential growth. The inflationary pressures, which are not exclusively due to higher energy costs, provide ample justification for policy tightening.
Indeed, the pace could be sped up as chair Jerome Powell has signalled. Furthermore, he has suggested that the ‘passive run-off’ of maturing assets on the balance sheet could start as early as April.
Next up will be the question of the extent to which tightening monetary policy will slow growth. But for now, the outlook is for bond yields to rise further in both the US and in the eurozone.
Disclaimer
Any views expressed here are those of the author as of the date of publication, are based on available information, and are subject to change without notice. Individual portfolio management teams may hold different views and may take different investment decisions for different clients. The views expressed in this podcast do not in any way constitute investment advice.
The value of investments and the income they generate may go down as well as up and it is possible that investors will not recover their initial outlay. Past performance is no guarantee for future returns.
Investing in emerging markets, or specialised or restricted sectors is likely to be subject to a higher-than-average volatility due to a high degree of concentration, greater uncertainty because less information is available, there is less liquidity or due to greater sensitivity to changes in market conditions (social, political and economic conditions).
Some emerging markets offer less security than the majority of international developed markets. For this reason, services for portfolio transactions, liquidation and conservation on behalf of funds invested in emerging markets may carry greater risk.
Writen by Nathalie Benatia. The post Weekly investment update – One central bank, two central banks, three central banks… appeared first on Investors' Corner - The official blog of BNP Paribas Asset Management, the sustainable investor for a changing world.
unemployment pandemic economic growth emerging markets equities monetary policy fomc rate cut open market committee fed federal reserve yuan new cases gdp hong kong european europe ukraine chinaSpread & Containment
Las Vegas Strip faces growing bed bug problem
With huge events including Formula 1, CES, and the Super Bowl looming, the Las Vegas Strip faces an issue that could be a major cause for concern.

Las Vegas beat the covid pandemic.
It wasn't that long ago when the Las Vegas Strip went dark and people questioned whether Caesars Entertainment, MGM Resorts International, Wynn Resorts, and other Strip players would emerge from the crisis intact.
Related: Las Vegas Strip report shares surprising F1 race news
In the darkest days, the entire Las Vegas Strip was closed down and when it reopened, it was not business as usual. Caesars Entertainment (CZR) - Get Free Report and MGM reopened slowly with all sorts of government-mandated restrictions in place.
The first months of the Strip's comeback featured temperature checks, a lot of plexiglass, gaming tables with limited numbers of players, masks, and social distancing. It was an odd mix of celebration and restraint as people were happy to be in Las Vegas, but the Strip was oddly empty, some casinos remained closed, and gaming floors were sparsely filled.
When vaccines became available, the Las Vegas Strip benefitted quickly. Business and international travelers were slow to return, but leisure travelers began bringing crowds back to pre-pandemic levels.
The comeback, however, was very fragile. CES 2022 was supposed to be Las Vegas's return to normal, the first major convention since covid. In reality, surging cases of the covid omicron variant caused most major companies to pull out.
Even with vaccines and covid tests required, an event that was supposed to be close to normal, ended up with 25% of 2020's pre-covid attendance. That CES showed just how quickly public sentiment — not actual danger — can ruin an event in Las Vegas.
Now, with November's Formula 1 Race, CES in January, and the Super Bowl in February all slated for Las Vegas, a rising health crisis threatens all of those events.
The Arena Media Brands, LLC and respective content providers to this website may receive compensation for some links to products and services on this website.
Image source: Palms Casino
The Las Vegas Strip has a bed bug problem
While bed bugs may not be as dangerous as covid, Respiratory Syncytial Virus (RSV), Legionnaires’ disease, and some of the other infectious diseases that the Las Vegas Strip has faced over the past few years, they're still problematic. Bed bugs spread easily and a small infestation can become a large one quickly.
The sores caused by bed bugs are also a social media nightmare for the Las Vegas Strip. If even a few Las Vegas Strip visitors wake up covered in bed bug bites, that could become a viral nightmare for the entire city.
In late-August, reports came out the bed bugs had been at seven Las Vegas hotel, mostly on the Strip over the past two years. The impacted properties includes Caesars Planet Hollywood and Caesars Palace as well as MGM Resort International's (MGM) - Get Free Report MGM Grand, and others including Circus Circus, The Palazzo, Tropicana, and Sahara.
VISIT LAS VEGAS: Are you ready to plan your dream Las Vegas Strip getaway?
"Now, that number is nine with the addition of The Venetian and Park MGM. According to the health department report, a Venetian guest reported seeing the bloodsuckers on July 29 and was moved to another room. An inspection three days later confirmed their presence," Casino.org reported.
The Park MGM bed bug incident took place on Aug. 14.
Bed bugs remain a Las Vegas Strip problem
Only Tropicana, which is soon going to be demolished, and Sahara, responded to Casino.org about their bed bug issues. Caesars and MGM have not commented publicly or responded to requests from KLAS or Casino.org.
That makes sense because the resorts do not want news to spread about potential bed bug problems when the actual incidents have so far been minimal. The problem is that unreported bed bug issues can rapidly snowball.
The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) shares some guidelines on bed bug bites on its website that hint at the depth of the problem facing Las Vegas Strip resorts.
"Regularly wash and heat-dry your bed sheets, blankets, bedspreads and any clothing that touches the floor. This reduces the number of bed bugs. Bed bugs and their eggs can hide in laundry containers/hampers. Remember to clean them when you do the laundry," the agency shared.
Normally, that would not be an issue in Las Vegas as rooms are cleaned daily. Since the covid pandemic, however, some people have opted out of daily cleaning and some resorts have encouraged that.
F1? SUPER BOWL? MARCH MADNESS? Plan a dream Las Vegas getaway.
Not having daily room cleaning in just a few rooms could lead to quick spread.
"Bed bugs spread so easily and so quickly, that the University of Kentucky's entomology department notes that "it often seems that bed bugs arise from nowhere."
"Once bed bugs are introduced, they can crawl from room to room, or floor to floor via cracks and openings in walls, floors and ceilings," warned the University's researchers.
spread social distancing pandemic
Government
Americans are having a tough time repaying pandemic-era loans received with inflated credit scores
Borrowers are realizing the responsibility of new debts too late.

With the economy of the United States at a standstill during the Covid-19 pandemic, the efforts to stimulate the economy brought many opportunities to people who may have not had them otherwise.
However, the extension of these opportunities to those who took advantage of the times has had its consequences.
Related: American Express reveals record profits, 'robust' spending in Q3 earnings report
Credit Crunch
A report by the Financial Times states that borrowers in the United States that took advantage of lending opportunities during the Covid-19 pandemic are falling behind on actually paying back their debt.
At a time when stimulus checks were handed out and loan repayments were frozen to help those affected by the economic shock of Covid-19, many consumers in the States saw that lenders became more willing to provide consumer credit.
According to a report by credit reporting agency TransUnion, the median consumer credit score jumped 20% to a peak of 676 in the first quarter of 2021, allowing many to finally have “good” credit scores. However, their data also showed that those who took out loans and credit from 2021 to early 2023 are having an hard time managing these debts.
“Consumer finance companies used this opportunity to juice up their growth at a time when funding was ample and consumers’ finances had gotten an artificial boost,” Chief economist of Moody’s Analytics Mark Zandi told FT. “Certainly a lot of lower-income households that got caught up in all of this will feel financial pain.”
Moody’s data shows that new credit cards accounts that were opened in the first quarter of 2023 have a 4% delinquency rate, while the same rate in September 2022 was 4.5%. According to the analysts, these levels were the highest for the same point of the year since 2008.
Additionally, a study by credit scoring company VantageScore found that credit cards issued in March 2022 had higher delinquency rates than cards issued at the same time during the prior four years.
More Investing:
- Why the recession never really hit -- and what indicates that it still could
- Jim Cramer and Dan Ives say a powerful technology will give the markets a boost
- Here's what companies Nvidia is joining in the $1 Trillion market cap club
Credit cards were not the only debts that American consumers took on. As per S&P Global Ratings data, riskier car loans taken on during the height of the pandemic have more repayment problems than in previous years. In 2022, subprime borrowers were becoming delinquent on new cars loans at twice the rate of pre-pandemic levels.
S&P auto loan tracker Amy Martin told FT that lenders during the pandemic were “rather aggressive” in terms of signing new loans.
Bill Moreland of research group BankRegData has warned about these rising delinquencies in the past and had recently estimated that by late 2022, there were hundreds of billions of dollars in what he calls “excess lending based upon artificially inflated credit scores”.
The Government's Role

Because so many are failing to pay their bills, many are wary that the government assistance may have been a financial double-edged sword; as they were meant to alleviate financial stress during lockdown, while it led some of them to financial difficulty.
The $2.2 trillion Cares Act federal aid package passed in the early stages of the pandemic not only put cash in the American consumer’s pocket, but also protected borrowers from foreclosure, default and in some instances, lenders were barred from reporting late payments to credit bureaus.
Yeshiva University law professor Pam Foohey specializes in consumer bankruptcy and believes that the Cares Act was good policy, however she shifts the blame away from the consumers and borrowers.
“I fault lenders and the market structure for not having a longer-term perspective. That’s not something that the Cares Act should have solved and it still exists and still needs to be addressed.”
Get exclusive access to portfolio managers and their proven investing strategies with Real Money Pro. Get started now.
recession economic shock bankruptcy foreclosure default stimulus trump lockdown stay-at-home orders pandemic coronavirus covid-19 recession stimulus russiaInternational
Inflation: raising interest rates was never the right medicine – here’s why central bankers did it anyway
We need to start cutting rates, but there’s something that has to happen first.

Inflation remains too high in the UK. The annual rate of consumer price inflation to September was 6.7%, the same as a month earlier. This is well below the 11.1% peak reached in October 2022, but the failure of inflation to keep falling indicates it is proving far more stubborn than anticipated.
This may prompt the Bank of England’s Monetary Policy Committee (MPC) to raise the benchmark interest rate yet again when it meets in November, but in my view this would not be entirely justified.
In reality, the rate hikes that began two years ago have not been very helpful in tackling inflation, at least not directly. So what’s the problem and is there a better alternative?
Right policy, wrong inflation
Raising interest rates is the MPC’s main tool for trying to get inflation back to its target rate of 2%. The idea is that this makes it more expensive to borrow money, which should reduce consumer demand for goods and services.
The trouble is that the type of inflation recently witnessed in the UK seems less a problem of excessive demand than because costs have been rising for manufacturers and service providers. It’s known as “cost-push inflation” as opposed to “demand-pull inflation”.
Inflation rates (UK, US, eurozone)

Production costs have risen for several reasons. During the COVID-19 pandemic, central banks “created money” through quantitative easing to enable their governments to run large spending deficits to pay for furloughs and other interventions to help citizens through the crisis.
When countries started reopening, it meant people had money in their pockets to buy more goods and services. Yet with China still in lockdown, global supply chains could not keep pace with the resurgent demand so prices went up – most notably oil.
Oil price (Brent crude, US$)

Then came the Ukraine war, which further drove up prices of fundamental commodities, such as energy. This made inflation much worse than it would otherwise have been. You can see this reflected in consumer price inflation (CPI): it was just 0.6% in the year to June 2020, then rose to 2.5% in the year to June 2021, reflecting the supply constraints at the end of lockdown. By June 2022, four months after Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, CPI was 9.4%.
The policy problem
This begs the question, why has the Bank of England (BoE) been raising rates if it’s unlikely to be effective? One answer is that other central banks have been raising rates. If the BoE doesn’t mirror rate rises in the US and eurozone, investors in the UK may move their money to these other areas because they’ll get better returns on bonds. This would see the pound depreciating against the US dollar and euro, in turn increasing import prices and aggravating inflation.
Part of the problem has been that the US has arguably faced more of the sort of demand-led inflation against which interest rates are effective. For one thing, the US has been less at the mercy of rising energy prices because it is energy self-sufficient. It also didn’t lock down as uniformly as other major economies during the pandemic, so had a little more space to grow.
At the same time, the US has been more effective at bringing down inflation than the UK, which again suggests it was fighting demand-driven price rises. In other words, the UK and other countries may to some extent have been forced to follow suit with raising interest rates to protect their currencies, not to fight inflation.
What next
How harmful have the rate rises been in the UK? They have not brought about a recession yet, but growth remains very weak. Lots of people are struggling with the cost of living, as well as rent or mortgage costs. Several million people are due to be hit by much higher mortgage rates as their fixed-rate deals end between now and the end of 2024.
UK GDP growth (%)

If hiking interest rates is not really helping to curb inflation, it makes sense to start moving in the opposite direction before the economic situation gets any worse. To avoid any damage to the pound, the answer is for the leading central banks to coordinate their policies so that they cut rates in lockstep.
Unless and until this happens, there would seem to be no quick fix available. One piece of good news is that the energy price cap for typical domestic consumption was reduced from October 1 from £1,976 to £1,834 a year. That 7% reduction should lead to consumer price inflation coming down significantly towards the end of 2023.
More generally, the Bank of England may simply have to hope that world events move inflation in the desired direction. A key question is going to be whether the wars in Ukraine and Israel/Gaza result in further cost pressures.
Unfortunately there is a precedent for a Middle East conflict leading to a global economic crisis: following the joint assault on Israel by Syria and Egypt in 1973, Israel’s retaliation prompted petroleum cartel OPEC to impose an oil embargo. This led to an almost fourfold increase in the price of crude oil.
Since oil was fundamental to the costs of production, inflation in the UK rose to over 16% in 1974. There followed high unemployment, resulting in an unwelcome combination that economists referred to as stagflation.
These days, global production is in fact less reliant on oil as renewables have become a growing part of the energy mix. Nonetheless, an oil price hike would still drive inflation higher and weaken economic growth. So if the Middle East crisis does spiral, we may be stuck with stubborn, untreatable inflation for even longer.
Robert Gausden does not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organisation that would benefit from this article, and has disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.
recession unemployment economic growth reopening bonds monetary policy mortgage rates currencies pound us dollar euro governor lockdown pandemic covid-19 recession gdp interest rates commodities oil uk russia ukraine china-
Uncategorized16 hours ago
California bill aims to cap crypto ATM withdrawals at $1K per day to combat scams
-
International16 hours ago
Stock Market Today: Stocks turn higher as Treasury yields retreat; big tech earnings up next
-
International18 hours ago
A further examination of the state of the economic tailwind
-
Uncategorized16 hours ago
Bitcoin price must break $31K to avoid 2023 ‘bearish fractal’
-
Uncategorized18 hours ago
Bitcoin ETF to trigger massive demand from institutions, EY says
-
Uncategorized18 hours ago
Crypto community accuses WSJ of exaggerating Hamas crypto funding by 99%
-
International18 hours ago
iPhone Maker Foxconn Investigated By Chinese Authorities
-
Uncategorized16 hours ago
An airline just launched one of the country’s longest domestic flights