Connect with us

PSEG ANNOUNCES 2022 FIRST QUARTER RESULTS

PSEG ANNOUNCES 2022 FIRST QUARTER RESULTS
PR Newswire
NEWARK, N.J., May 3, 2022

NET LOSS OF <$0.01 PER SHARE DRIVEN BY MARK TO MARKET ADJUSTMENTS
NON-GAAP OPERATING EARNINGS OF $1.33 PER SHARE
CEO Leadership Succession to Begin September 1   
Re…

Published

on

PSEG ANNOUNCES 2022 FIRST QUARTER RESULTS

PR Newswire

NET LOSS OF <$0.01 PER SHARE DRIVEN BY MARK TO MARKET ADJUSTMENTS

NON-GAAP OPERATING EARNINGS OF $1.33 PER SHARE

CEO Leadership Succession to Begin September 1   

Re-Affirms 2022 Non-GAAP Operating Earnings Guidance of $3.35 - $3.55 per Share

 NEWARK, N.J., May 3, 2022 /PRNewswire/ -- Public Service Enterprise Group (NYSE: PEG) reported a Net Loss of $2 million, or less than $0.01 per share for the first quarter of 2022, compared to Net Income of $648 million, or $1.28 per share, in the first quarter of 2021.  The Net Loss reported for the first quarter of 2022 reflects $674 million of reconciling items, which are predominantly mark to market adjustments that are routinely excluded from non-GAAP Operating Earnings as shown in Attachments 7 and 8.  Non-GAAP Operating Earnings for the first quarter of 2022 were $672 million, or $1.33 per share, compared to non-GAAP Operating Earnings of $650 million, or $1.28 per share in the first quarter of 2021. 

Ralph Izzo, chair, president and chief executive officer said, "Our non-GAAP results for the first quarter reflect solid utility and nuclear operations and rate base growth from regulated investments, as well as lower cost resulting from the completed sale of PSEG Fossil that will benefit first-half 2022 comparisons."

On April 19, Ralph Izzo announced his retirement from PSEG.  Izzo continued, "It has been an honor and a privilege to serve as CEO for the last 15 years.  I started at PSEG 30 years ago and I have always endeavored to put the company and the communities we serve on a sustainable path.  I am proud that PSEG is shaping a future where customers use less energy, the energy they use is cleaner than ever before, and delivered with reliability unsurpassed in our history, while adding shareholder value."

As part of a planned leadership succession, the PSEG Board of Directors elected Ralph LaRossa, PSEG's chief operating officer, as president and chief executive officer effective September 1, 2022.  Izzo will serve as executive chair of the board effective September 1 until his retirement from PSEG on December 31, 2022, in support of a smooth transition.  LaRossa will assume the additional responsibilities of chair of the board on January 1, 2023.

The following tables provide a reconciliation of PSEG's Net Income/(Loss) to non-GAAP Operating Earnings for the first quarter.  See Attachments 7 and 8 for a complete list of items excluded from Net Income/(Loss) in the determination of non-GAAP Operating Earnings.

PSEG CONSOLIDATED (unaudited)
First Quarter Comparative Results


Income
($ millions)

Diluted Earnings
(Per Share)


2022

2021

2022

2021

Net Income/(Loss)

$(2)

$648

$(0.00)

$1.28

  Reconciling Items

674

2

1.34

-

  Share Differential*

-

-

(0.01)

-

Non-GAAP Operating Earnings

$672

$650

$1.33

$1.28

  Average Shares

501

507


*Approximately three million potentially dilutive shares were excluded from fully diluted average shares outstanding used to calculate the diluted GAAP loss per share for the three months ended March 31, 2022 as their impact was antidilutive to GAAP results.  For non-GAAP per share calculations, fully diluted average shares outstanding of 504 million were used, including the three million potentially dilutive shares as they were dilutive to non-GAAP results.  As a result of the use of different denominators for GAAP Net Loss and non-GAAP Operating Earnings, a reconciling line item, "Share Differential," has been added to the year-to-date 2022 results to reconcile the two Earnings/(Loss) per share calculations.

Ralph Izzo added, "We are re-affirming our 2022 non-GAAP Operating Earnings guidance of $3.35 - $3.55 per share.  Our regulated investment programs are producing predictable utility growth, and the Conservation Incentive Program (CIP) is effectively minimizing variations on electric and gas revenues from the rollout of our energy efficiency programs and other impacts such as weather.  We are on track to execute PSE&G's $2.9 billion, 2022 capital spending plan, part of PSEG's five-year, $15 billion to $17 billion capital plan through 2025, with over 90% directed toward PSE&G."

PSEG 2022 Non-GAAP Operating Earnings Guidance


($ millions, except EPS)

2022E

PSE&G

$1,510 - $1,560

Carbon-Free, Infrastructure & Other

170 - 220

PSEG non-GAAP Operating Earnings

$1,680 - $1,780

PSEG non-GAAP Operating EPS

$3.35 - $3.55


E = Estimate 
Guidance for Carbon-Free, Infrastructure & Other excludes results related to the fossil generating
assets sold in February 2022.

 

Financial Results and Outlook  

PSE&G

Public Service Electric & Gas 

First Quarter 2022 and 2021 Comparative Results 



($ millions, except EPS)

1Q 2022

1Q 2021

Q/Q Change

   Net Income

$509

$477

$32

   Earnings Per Share

$1.02

$0.94

$0.08

Share Differential

(0.01)

-

(0.01)

Non-GAAP Operating EPS*

$1.01

$0.94

$0.07

*For non-GAAP per share calculation, for the three months ended March 31, 2022, fully diluted average shares outstanding of 504 million were used, including the three million potentially dilutive shares as they were dilutive to non-GAAP results. As a result of the use of different denominators for GAAP Net Loss and non-GAAP Operating Earnings, a reconciling line item, "Share Differential," has been added to the year-to-date 2022 results to reconcile the two Earnings/(Loss) per share calculations.  

For the first quarter of 2022, PSE&G Net Income rose by $32 million, or by 6.7%, compared with  first quarter 2021 results.  PSE&G's first quarter 2022 non-GAAP Operating Earnings improved driven by revenue growth from ongoing capital investment programs.  Compared to the first quarter of 2021, Transmission was $0.03 per share unfavorable, reflecting the August 2021 implementation of a new Transmission formula rate, including a lower return on equity, partly offset by growth in rate base.  For distribution, Gas margin improved by $0.08 per share over first quarter 2021, half of which was driven by the scheduled recovery of investments made under Gas System Modernization Program II, with the balance reflecting growth in the number of gas customers, and the true up from the Conservation Incentive Program.  Electric margin rose by $0.02 per share compared to the first quarter of 2021, also reflecting a higher number of customers and the implementation of the CIP mechanism.  Other margin, primarily related to appliance service, was $0.02 per share favorable compared with the first quarter of 2021. 

O&M expense was $0.02 per share unfavorable compared with first quarter 2021, reflecting timing and various costs.  Higher depreciation expense reduced results by $0.01 per share reflecting higher plant in service.  Lower pension expense added $0.01 per share compared to first quarter 2021.  In addition, the impact of PSEG's $500 million share repurchase had a $0.01 per share benefit in the first quarter of 2022.  Flow through taxes and other items had a net unfavorable impact of $0.01 per share compared to first quarter 2021, driven by the use of an annual effective tax rate that will reverse over the remainder of the year.

Winter weather in the first quarter of 2022 (measured by heating degree-days) was slightly colder  than normal.  As a result of implementing the CIP in 2021, variations in weather (positive or negative) have a limited impact on electric and gas margins while enabling the widespread adoption of PSE&G's energy efficiency programs.  For the trailing 12-months ended March 31, weather-normalized electric and gas sales reflected lower Residential (lower by 4.8% and 3.2%, respectively) and higher Commercial and Industrial (higher by 3.3% and 2.8%, respectively) sales, as more people return to work outside the home.  Growth in the number of electric and gas customers remained positive by approximately 1% during the trailing 12-month period.

In November 2021, PSE&G filed an Infrastructure Advancement Program to invest $848 million in last mile reliability and electric vehicle make-ready infrastructure.  This filing is currently pending before the New Jersey Board of Public Utilities (BPU).  Consistent with the procedural schedule in this case, settlement discussions currently are taking place, and final action from the BPU is anticipated in the fall. 

PSE&G invested approximately $656 million during the first quarter and is on track to execute its planned 2022 capital investment program of $2.9 billion.  The 2022 capital spending program includes infrastructure upgrades to its transmission and distribution facilities, as well as the continued rollout of the Clean Energy Future investments in energy efficiency, energy cloud (smart meters) and electric vehicle charging infrastructure.

PSE&G's forecast of Net Income for 2022 is unchanged at $1,510 million - $1,560 million.

PSEG Carbon-Free, Infrastructure & Other

Carbon-Free, Infrastructure & Other 

First Quarter 2022 and 2021 


($ millions, except EPS)

1Q 2022

1Q 2021

Q/Q Change

Net Income/(Loss)

$(511)

$171

$(682)

Earnings/(Loss) Per Share (EPS)

$(1.02)

$0.34

$(1.36)

Non-GAAP Operating Earnings

$163

$173

$(10)

Non-GAAP Operating EPS

$0.32

$0.34

$(0.02)

*Non-GAAP Operating Earnings for 1Q 2022 exclude the results of fossil generation sold in February 2022.

Carbon-Free, Infrastructure & Other (CFIO) reported a Net Loss of $511 million ($1.02 per share) for the first quarter of 2022 and non-GAAP Operating Earnings of $163 million ($0.32 per share).  This compares to first quarter 2021 Net Income of $171 million and non-GAAP Operating Earnings of $173 million, which included results of the divested fossil assets.

For the first quarter of 2022, electric gross margin declined by $0.27 per share, primarily due to the absence of Solar Source and the completed sale of the 6,750 MW fossil portfolio in February 2022.  This reduction in gross margin also includes recontracting approximately 8 TWh of nuclear generation at a $3/MWh lower average price.  Higher margins from Gas Operations of $0.04 per share compared favorably with the year-earlier quarter. 

Year over year cost comparisons were better by $0.21 per share due to the divestitures, driven by lower O&M, depreciation and interest expense that will mainly benefit first-half 2022 results.  The third and fourth quarters of 2021 reflected the sale of Solar Source in June, the cessation of fossil depreciation from August onward, and the retirement of PSEG Power's outstanding debt in October. 

Taxes and other was a favorable $0.01 per share comparison versus first quarter 2021 results.  Parent activity was $0.01 per share unfavorable compared with the first quarter 2021, reflecting higher interest expense. 

Nuclear generating output increased by over 2% to 8.4 TWh, reflecting the absence of the coast-down to Hope Creek's Spring 2021 refueling.  The full availability of Hope Creek during the first quarter of 2022 helped the nuclear fleet operate at a capacity factor of 100% for the first quarter.  PSEG is forecasting generation output of 21 to 23 TWh for the remaining quarters of 2022, and has hedged approximately 95% - 100% of this production at an average price of $28 per MWh.  For 2023, PSEG is forecasting nuclear baseload output of 30 to 32 TWh and has hedged 95% - 100% of this output at an average price of $30 per MWh.  For 2024, PSEG is forecasting nuclear baseload output of 29 to 31 TWh and has hedged 50% - 55% of this output at an average price of $31 per MWh. 

The forecast of non-GAAP Operating Earnings for Carbon-Free, Infrastructure & Other is unchanged at $170 million - $220 million.  The CFIO guidance for 2022 excludes results related to the fossil assets sold in February 2022.  All free cash flow generated from the fossil operations prior to the closing were translated into an adjustment to the final purchase price. 

Recent Financing Activity

In March 2022, PSEG and PSEG Power consolidated their revolving credit agreements into a master credit facility with total borrowing capacity of $2.75 billion.  PSE&G expanded its existing revolving credit agreement to provide for $1 billion of credit capacity.  Both facilities are extended through March 2027.  As of March 31, PSEG's total available credit capacity was $3.2 billion, in addition to approximately $1.6 billion of cash and short-term investments on PSEG's balance sheet inclusive of $910 million at PSE&G.

PSEG Power had net cash collateral postings of $1.5 billion at March 31 related to out-of–the-money hedge positions from higher energy prices during the first quarter of 2022.  Collateral postings have continued to increase subsequent to March 31, as power prices continued to rise.  At the end of April, PSEG Power had net cash collateral postings of $2.6 billion.  The majority of this collateral relates to hedges in place through the end of 2023 and is expected to be returned as PSEG Power satisfies its obligations under those contracts. 

In March 2022, PSEG Power closed on a $1.25 billion, variable rate 3-year term loan.  PSE&G issued its first "Green Bond" in March 2022, $500 million of Secured Medium-Term Notes due 2032, under PSEG's new Sustainable Financing Framework.  Subsequent to March 31, PSEG entered into a $1.5 billion, variable rate term loan. 

PSEG will host a conference call to review its First Quarter 2022 results with the financial community at 11AM EDT today.  This event can be accessed by visiting https://investor.pseg.com/investor-news-and-events to register.

Public Service Enterprise Group Inc. (PSEG) (NYSE: PEG) is a publicly traded diversified energy company with approximately 12,500 employees. Headquartered in Newark, N.J., PSEG's principal operating subsidiaries are: Public Service Electric and Gas Co. (PSE&G), PSEG Power and PSEG Long Island. PSEG is a Fortune 500 company included in the S&P 500 Index and has been named to the Dow Jones Sustainability Index for North America for 14 consecutive years.  (https://corporate.pseg.com).

Non-GAAP Financial Measures

Management uses non-GAAP Operating Earnings in its internal analysis, and in communications with investors and analysts, as a consistent measure for comparing PSEG's financial performance to previous financial results. Non-GAAP Operating Earnings exclude the impact of returns (losses) associated with the Nuclear Decommissioning Trust (NDT), Mark-to-Market (MTM) accounting and material one-time items.

See Attachments 7 and 8 for a complete list of items excluded from Net Income/(Loss) in the determination of non-GAAP Operating Earnings. The presentation of non-GAAP Operating Earnings is intended to complement, and should not be considered an alternative to the presentation of Net Income/(Loss), which is an indicator of financial performance determined in accordance with GAAP. In addition, non-GAAP Operating Earnings as presented in this release may not be comparable to similarly titled measures used by other companies.

Due to the forward looking nature of non-GAAP Operating Earnings guidance, PSEG is unable to reconcile this non-GAAP financial measure to the most directly comparable GAAP financial measure. Management is unable to project certain reconciling items, in particular MTM and NDT gains (losses), for future periods due to market volatility.

Forward-Looking Statements

Certain of the matters discussed in this report about our and our subsidiaries' future performance, including, without limitation, future revenues, earnings, strategies, prospects, consequences and all other statements that are not purely historical constitute "forward-looking statements" within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Such forward-looking statements are subject to risks and uncertainties, which could cause actual results to differ materially from those anticipated. Such statements are based on management's beliefs as well as assumptions made by and information currently available to management. When used herein, the words "anticipate," "intend," "estimate," "believe," "expect," "plan," "should," "hypothetical," "potential," "forecast," "project," variations of such words and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements. Factors that may cause actual results to differ are often presented with the forward-looking statements themselves. Other factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those contemplated in any forward-looking statements made by us herein are discussed in filings we make with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), including our Annual Report on Form 10-K and subsequent reports on Form 10-Q and Form 8-K. These factors include, but are not limited to:

  • any inability to successfully develop, obtain regulatory approval for, or construct transmission and distribution, and solar and wind generation projects;
  • the physical, financial and transition risks related to climate change, including risks relating to potentially increased legislative and regulatory burdens, changing customer preferences and lawsuits;
  • any equipment failures, accidents, critical operating technology or business system failures, severe weather events, acts of war, terrorism, sabotage, cyberattack or other incidents that may impact our ability to provide safe and reliable service to our customers;
  • any inability to recover the carrying amount of our long-lived assets;
  • disruptions or cost increases in our supply chain, including labor shortages;
  • any inability to maintain sufficient liquidity or access sufficient capital on commercially reasonable terms;
  • the impact of cybersecurity attacks or intrusions or other disruptions to our information technology, operational or other systems;
  • the impact of the ongoing coronavirus pandemic;
  • failure to attract and retain a qualified workforce;
  • inflation, including increases in the costs of equipment, materials, fuel and labor;
  • the impact of our covenants in our debt instruments on our business;
  • adverse performance of our nuclear decommissioning and defined benefit plan trust fund investments and changes in funding requirements;
  • the failure to complete, or delays in completing, the Ocean Wind 1 offshore wind project and the failure to realize the anticipated strategic and financial benefits of this project;
  • fluctuations in wholesale power and natural gas markets, including the potential impacts on the economic viability of our generation units;
  • our ability to obtain adequate nuclear fuel supply;
  • market risks impacting the operation of our nuclear generating stations;
  • changes in technology related to energy generation, distribution and consumption and changes in customer usage patterns;
  • third-party credit risk relating to our sale of nuclear generation output and purchase of nuclear fuel;
  • any inability to meet our commitments under forward sale obligations;
  • reliance on transmission facilities to maintain adequate transmission capacity for our nuclear generation fleet;
  • the impact of changes in state and federal legislation and regulations on our business, including PSE&G's ability to recover costs and earn returns on authorized investments;
  • PSE&G's proposed investment programs may not be fully approved by regulators and its capital investment may be lower than planned;
  • the absence of a long-term legislative or other solution for our New Jersey nuclear plants that sufficiently values them for their carbon-free, fuel diversity and resilience attributes, or the impact of the current or subsequent payments for such attributes being materially adversely modified through legal proceedings;
  • adverse changes in and non-compliance with energy industry laws, policies, regulations and standards, including market structures and transmission planning and transmission returns;
  • risks associated with our ownership and operation of nuclear facilities, including increased nuclear fuel storage costs, regulatory risks, such as compliance with the Atomic Energy Act and trade control, environmental and other regulations, as well as financial, environmental and health and safety risks;
  • changes in federal and state environmental laws and regulations and enforcement;
  • delays in receipt of, or an inability to receive, necessary licenses and permits; and
  • changes in tax laws and regulations.

All of the forward-looking statements made in this report are qualified by these cautionary statements and we cannot assure you that the results or developments anticipated by management will be realized or even if realized, will have the expected consequences to, or effects on, us or our business, prospects, financial condition, results of operations or cash flows. Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements in making any investment decision. Forward- looking statements made in this report apply only as of the date of this report. While we may elect to update forward-looking statements from time to time, we specifically disclaim any obligation to do so, even in light of new information or future events, unless otherwise required by applicable securities laws.

The forward-looking statements contained in this report are intended to qualify for the safe harbor provisions of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

From time to time, PSEG and PSE&G release important information via postings on their corporate Investor Relations website at https://investor.pseg.com. Investors and other interested parties are encouraged to visit the Investor Relations website to review new postings.  You can sign up for automatic email alerts regarding new postings at the bottom of the webpage at https://investor.pseg.com or navigating to the Email Alerts webpage here.

 

CONTACTS


Investor Relations:

Media Relations:

973-430-6565

908-531-4253

Carlotta.Chan@pseg.com

Marijke.Shugrue@pseg.com

 












Attachment 1



PUBLIC SERVICE ENTERPRISE GROUP INCORPORATED

Consolidating Statements of Operations

(Unaudited, $ millions, except per share data)



















Three Months Ended March 31, 2022





















PSEG


Eliminations(b)


PSE&G


Carbon-
Free,
Infrastructure
& Other
(CFIO)(a)


















OPERATING REVENUES  


$           2,313


$                  (584)


$            2,284


$                  613


















OPERATING EXPENSES













Energy Costs


1,245


(584)


968


861





Operation and Maintenance


794


(7)


463


338





Depreciation and Amortization


283


6


241


36





Losses on Asset Dispositions and Impairments


43


-


-


43






  Total Operating Expenses


2,365


(585)


1,672


1,278


















OPERATING INCOME (LOSS)


(52)


1


612


(665)


















Income from Equity Method Investments


4


-


-


4




Net Gains (Losses) on Trust Investments


(68)


(2)


-


(66)




Other Income (Deductions)


5


(5)


19


(9)




Non-Operating Pension and OPEB Credits (Costs)


94


7


70


17




Interest Expense


(137)


-


(103)


(34)


















INCOME (LOSS) BEFORE INCOME TAXES 


(154)


1


598


(753)


















Income Tax Benefit (Expense)


152


(1)


(89)


242


















NET INCOME (LOSS)


$                 (2)


$                         -


$               509


$                (511)





Reconciling Items Excluded from Net Income (Loss)(c)


674


-


-


674




OPERATING EARNINGS (non-GAAP)


$              672


$                         -


$               509


$                  163


















Earnings Per Share


























NET INCOME (LOSS)


$             0.00


$                         -


$              1.02


$               (1.02)





Reconciling Items Excluded from Net Income (Loss) (c)


1.34


-


-


1.34





Share Differential (c)


(0.01)


-


(0.01)


-




OPERATING EARNINGS (non-GAAP)


$             1.33


$                         -


$              1.01


$                 0.32




































Three Months Ended March 31, 2021





















PSEG


Eliminations(b)


PSE&G


CFIO (a)


















OPERATING REVENUES  


$           2,889


$                  (502)


$            2,073


$               1,318


















OPERATING EXPENSES













Energy Costs


1,029


(502)


849


682





Operation and Maintenance


778


(4)


424


358





Depreciation and Amortization


341


7


241


93






  Total Operating Expenses


2,148


(499)


1,514


1,133


















OPERATING INCOME 


741


(3)


559


185


















Income from Equity Method Investments


3


-


-


3




Net Gains (Losses) on Trust Investments


60


1


1


58




Other Income (Deductions)


25


(4)


28


1




Non-Operating Pension and OPEB Credits (Costs)


82


4


66


12




Interest Expense


(146)


-


(98)


(48)


















INCOME BEFORE INCOME TAXES 


765


(2)


556


211


















Income Tax Expense


(117)


2


(79)


(40)


















NET INCOME


$              648


$                         -


$               477


$                  171





Reconciling Items Excluded from Net Income(c)


2


-


-


2




OPERATING EARNINGS (non-GAAP)


$              650


$                         -


$               477


$                  173


















Earnings Per Share


























NET INCOME


$             1.28


$                         -


$              0.94


$                 0.34





Reconciling Items Excluded from Net Income(c)


-


-


-


-




OPERATING EARNINGS (non-GAAP)


$             1.28


$                         -


$              0.94


$                 0.34

































(a) Includes activities at PSEG Power, Energy Holdings, PSEG Long Island and the Parent.








(b) Includes intercompany eliminations and activity at PSEG Services Corporation.








(c) See Attachments 7 and 8 for details of items excluded from Net Income (Loss) to compute Operating Earnings (non-GAAP) and the impact of using different share amounts (Share Differential) for calculating earnings per share for PSEG's consolidated GAAP Net Income (Loss) versus consolidated Operating Earnings (non-GAAP).  



 

 









Attachment 2




PUBLIC SERVICE ENTERPRISE GROUP INCORPORATED



Capitalization Schedule



(Unaudited, $ millions)



























March 31,


December 31,








2022


2021



DEBT









Commercial Paper and Loans



$                 1,676


$                 3,519




Long-Term Debt*



17,668


15,919





Total Debt



19,344


19,438























STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY









Common Stock



4,978


5,045




Treasury Stock



(1,336)


(896)




Retained Earnings



10,366


10,639




Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss



(410)


(350)





Total Stockholders' Equity



13,598


14,438





Total Capitalization



$               32,942


$               33,876















*Includes current portion of Long-Term Debt







 




Attachment 3

PUBLIC SERVICE ENTERPRISE GROUP INCORPORATED

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(Unaudited, $ millions)














 

 Three Months Ended March 31, 


2022


2021

CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES




 Net Income (Loss)

$                            (2)


$                        648

 Adjustments to Reconcile Net Income (Loss) to Net Cash Flows




   From Operating Activities

474


379

NET CASH PROVIDED BY (USED IN) OPERATING ACTIVITIES

472


1,027





NET CASH PROVIDED BY (USED IN) INVESTING ACTIVITIES

1,183


(624)





NET CASH PROVIDED BY (USED IN) FINANCING ACTIVITIES

(876)


(134)





Net Change in Cash, Cash Equivalents and Restricted Cash

779


269





Cash, Cash Equivalents and Restricted Cash at Beginning of Period

863


572

Cash, Cash Equivalents and Restricted Cash at End of Period

$                     1,642


$                        841

 






Attachment 4

PUBLIC SERVICE ELECTRIC & GAS COMPANY

 Retail Sales 

(Unaudited)

March 31, 2022








Electric Sales
















Three Months


   Change vs.



Sales (millions kWh)

Ended


2021



Residential

3,201


(2%)



Commercial & Industrial

6,511


4%



Other

100


1%



Total

9,812


2%














Gas Sold and Transported















Three Months


Change vs.



Sales (millions therms)

Ended


2021



Firm Sales






Residential Sales

740


(0%)



Commercial & Industrial

495


5%



Total Firm Sales

1,235


2%









Non-Firm Sales*






Commercial & Industrial

159


(43%)



Total Non-Firm Sales

159











Total Sales

1,394


(7%)









*Contract Service Gas rate included in non-firm sales










Weather Data*









Three Months


Change vs.




Ended


2021



Degree Days - Actual

2,533


4%



Degree Days - Normal

2,519
















*Winter weather as defined by heating degree days (HDD) to serve as a measure for the need for heating. For each day, HDD is calculated as HDD = 65°F – the average hourly daily temperature. The measures use data provided by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration based on readings from Newark Liberty International Airport. Comparisons to normal are based on twenty years of historic data.

 

 






Attachment 5








Nuclear Generation Measures


(Unaudited)










GWhr Breakdown










Three Months Ended




March 31,




2022


2021


Nuclear - NJ

5,550


5,351


Nuclear - PA

2,894


2,894




8,444


8,245










% Generation










Three Months Ended




March 31,




2022


2021


Nuclear - NJ

66%


65%


Nuclear - PA

34%


35%




100%


100%

 








Attachment 6

PUBLIC SERVICE ENTERPRISE GROUP INCORPORATED

Statistical Measures

(Unaudited)






















Three Months Ended March 31,






2022


2021

Weighted Average Common Shares Outstanding (millions)*





Basic




501


504


Diluted




501


507









Stock Price at End of Period



$70.00


$60.21









Dividends Paid per Share of Common Stock 


$0.54


$0.51









Dividend Yield




3.1%


3.4%









Book Value per Common Share



$27.35


$32.33









Market Price as a Percent of Book Value


256%


186%









*Approximately three million potentially dilutive shares were excluded from fully diluted average
shares outstanding used to calculate the diluted GAAP loss per share for the three months ended
March 31, 2022 as their impact was antidilutive to GAAP results.

 

 








Attachment 7


PUBLIC SERVICE ENTERPRISE GROUP INCORPORATED


Consolidated Operating Earnings (non-GAAP) Reconciliation










Reconciling Items

Three Months Ended


March 31,



2022


2021





($ millions, Unaudited)










Net Income (Loss)



$           (2)


$      648




(Gain) Loss on Nuclear Decommissioning Trust (NDT) 








Fund Related Activity, pre-tax


72


(55)




(Gain) Loss on Mark-to-Market (MTM), pre-tax(a)


845


47




Plant Retirements, Dispositions and Impairments, pre-tax(b)


16


-




Income Taxes related to Operating Earnings (non-GAAP) reconciling items(c)


(259)


10



Operating Earnings (non-GAAP)


$         672


$      650












PSEG Fully Diluted Average Shares Outstanding (in millions)(d)


501


507





($ Per Share Impact -
Diluted, Unaudited)










Net Income (Loss)



$        0.00


$     1.28




(Gain) Loss on NDT Fund Related Activity, pre-tax


0.14


(0.11)




(Gain) Loss on MTM, pre-tax(a)


1.69


0.09




Plant Retirements, Dispositions and Impairments, pre-tax(b)


0.03


-




Income Taxes related to Operating Earnings (non-GAAP) reconciling items(c)


(0.52)


0.02




Share Differential(d)


(0.01)


-



Operating Earnings (non-GAAP)


$        1.33


$     1.28



















 

(a) Includes the financial impact from positions with forward delivery months.







 (b) Amount for the three months ended March 31, 2022 includes the results for fossil generation sold in February 2022.



 (c) Income tax effect calculated at the statutory rate except for qualified NDT related activity, which records an additional 20% trust tax on income (loss) from qualified NDT Funds.



 (d) Approximately three million potentially dilutive shares were excluded from fully diluted average shares outstanding used to calculate the diluted GAAP loss per share for the three months ended March 31, 2022 as their impact was antidilutive to GAAP results. For non-GAAP per share calculations, we used fully diluted average shares outstanding of 504 million, including the three million potentially dilutive shares as they were dilutive to non-GAAP results. As a result of the use of different denominators for non-GAAP Operating Earnings and GAAP Net Loss, a reconciling line item, "Share Differential," has been added to the year-to-date 2022 results to reconcile the two Earnings/(Loss) per share calculations. 

 

 








Attachment 8


















CFIO Operating Earnings (non-GAAP) Reconciliation












Three Months Ended


Reconciling Items

March 31,





2022


2021





($ millions, Unaudited)










Net Income (Loss)


$        (511)


$     171




(Gain) Loss on NDT Fund Related Activity, pre-tax


72


(55)




(Gain) Loss on MTM, pre-tax(a)


845


47




Plant Retirements, Dispositions and Impairments, pre-tax(b)


16


-




Income Taxes related to Operating Earnings (non-GAAP) reconciling items(c)


(259)


10



Operating Earnings (non-GAAP)


$         163


$     173












PSEG Fully Diluted Average Shares Outstanding (in millions)(d)


501


507












(a) Includes the financial impact from positions with forward delivery months.








(b) Amount for the three months ended March 31, 2022 includes the results for fossil generation sold in February 2022.



(c) Income tax effect calculated at the statutory rate except for qualified NDT related activity, which records an additional 20% trust tax on income (loss) from qualified NDT Funds.



(d) Approximately three million potentially dilutive shares were excluded from fully diluted average shares outstanding used to calculate the diluted GAAP loss per share for the three months ended March 31, 2022 as their impact was antidilutive to GAAP results. For non-GAAP per share calculations, we used fully diluted average shares outstanding of 504 million, including the three million potentially dilutive shares as they were dilutive to non-GAAP results. 

 

 

View original content to download multimedia:https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/pseg-announces-2022-first-quarter-results-301538310.html

SOURCE PSEG

Read More

Continue Reading

Government

Are Voters Recoiling Against Disorder?

Are Voters Recoiling Against Disorder?

Authored by Michael Barone via The Epoch Times (emphasis ours),

The headlines coming out of the Super…

Published

on

Are Voters Recoiling Against Disorder?

Authored by Michael Barone via The Epoch Times (emphasis ours),

The headlines coming out of the Super Tuesday primaries have got it right. Barring cataclysmic changes, Donald Trump and Joe Biden will be the Republican and Democratic nominees for president in 2024.

(Left) President Joe Biden delivers remarks on canceling student debt at Culver City Julian Dixon Library in Culver City, Calif., on Feb. 21, 2024. (Right) Republican presidential candidate and former U.S. President Donald Trump stands on stage during a campaign event at Big League Dreams Las Vegas in Las Vegas, Nev., on Jan. 27, 2024. (Mario Tama/Getty Images; David Becker/Getty Images)

With Nikki Haley’s withdrawal, there will be no more significantly contested primaries or caucuses—the earliest both parties’ races have been over since something like the current primary-dominated system was put in place in 1972.

The primary results have spotlighted some of both nominees’ weaknesses.

Donald Trump lost high-income, high-educated constituencies, including the entire metro area—aka the Swamp. Many but by no means all Haley votes there were cast by Biden Democrats. Mr. Trump can’t afford to lose too many of the others in target states like Pennsylvania and Michigan.

Majorities and large minorities of voters in overwhelmingly Latino counties in Texas’s Rio Grande Valley and some in Houston voted against Joe Biden, and even more against Senate nominee Rep. Colin Allred (D-Texas).

Returns from Hispanic precincts in New Hampshire and Massachusetts show the same thing. Mr. Biden can’t afford to lose too many Latino votes in target states like Arizona and Georgia.

When Mr. Trump rode down that escalator in 2015, commentators assumed he’d repel Latinos. Instead, Latino voters nationally, and especially the closest eyewitnesses of Biden’s open-border policy, have been trending heavily Republican.

High-income liberal Democrats may sport lawn signs proclaiming, “In this house, we believe ... no human is illegal.” The logical consequence of that belief is an open border. But modest-income folks in border counties know that flows of illegal immigrants result in disorder, disease, and crime.

There is plenty of impatience with increased disorder in election returns below the presidential level. Consider Los Angeles County, America’s largest county, with nearly 10 million people, more people than 40 of the 50 states. It voted 71 percent for Mr. Biden in 2020.

Current returns show county District Attorney George Gascon winning only 21 percent of the vote in the nonpartisan primary. He’ll apparently face Republican Nathan Hochman, a critic of his liberal policies, in November.

Gascon, elected after the May 2020 death of counterfeit-passing suspect George Floyd in Minneapolis, is one of many county prosecutors supported by billionaire George Soros. His policies include not charging juveniles as adults, not seeking higher penalties for gang membership or use of firearms, and bringing fewer misdemeanor cases.

The predictable result has been increased car thefts, burglaries, and personal robberies. Some 120 assistant district attorneys have left the office, and there’s a backlog of 10,000 unprosecuted cases.

More than a dozen other Soros-backed and similarly liberal prosecutors have faced strong opposition or have left office.

St. Louis prosecutor Kim Gardner resigned last May amid lawsuits seeking her removal, Milwaukee’s John Chisholm retired in January, and Baltimore’s Marilyn Mosby was defeated in July 2022 and convicted of perjury in September 2023. Last November, Loudoun County, Virginia, voters (62 percent Biden) ousted liberal Buta Biberaj, who declined to prosecute a transgender student for assault, and in June 2022 voters in San Francisco (85 percent Biden) recalled famed radical Chesa Boudin.

Similarly, this Tuesday, voters in San Francisco passed ballot measures strengthening police powers and requiring treatment of drug-addicted welfare recipients.

In retrospect, it appears the Floyd video, appearing after three months of COVID-19 confinement, sparked a frenzied, even crazed reaction, especially among the highly educated and articulate. One fatal incident was seen as proof that America’s “systemic racism” was worse than ever and that police forces should be defunded and perhaps abolished.

2020 was “the year America went crazy,” I wrote in January 2021, a year in which police funding was actually cut by Democrats in New York, Los Angeles, San Francisco, Seattle, and Denver. A year in which young New York Times (NYT) staffers claimed they were endangered by the publication of Sen. Tom Cotton’s (R-Ark.) opinion article advocating calling in military forces if necessary to stop rioting, as had been done in Detroit in 1967 and Los Angeles in 1992. A craven NYT publisher even fired the editorial page editor for running the article.

Evidence of visible and tangible discontent with increasing violence and its consequences—barren and locked shelves in Manhattan chain drugstores, skyrocketing carjackings in Washington, D.C.—is as unmistakable in polls and election results as it is in daily life in large metropolitan areas. Maybe 2024 will turn out to be the year even liberal America stopped acting crazy.

Chaos and disorder work against incumbents, as they did in 1968 when Democrats saw their party’s popular vote fall from 61 percent to 43 percent.

Views expressed in this article are opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of The Epoch Times or ZeroHedge.

Tyler Durden Sat, 03/09/2024 - 23:20

Read More

Continue Reading

Government

Veterans Affairs Kept COVID-19 Vaccine Mandate In Place Without Evidence

Veterans Affairs Kept COVID-19 Vaccine Mandate In Place Without Evidence

Authored by Zachary Stieber via The Epoch Times (emphasis ours),

The…

Published

on

Veterans Affairs Kept COVID-19 Vaccine Mandate In Place Without Evidence

Authored by Zachary Stieber via The Epoch Times (emphasis ours),

The U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) reviewed no data when deciding in 2023 to keep its COVID-19 vaccine mandate in place.

Doses of a COVID-19 vaccine in Washington in a file image. (Jacquelyn Martin/Pool/AFP via Getty Images)

VA Secretary Denis McDonough said on May 1, 2023, that the end of many other federal mandates “will not impact current policies at the Department of Veterans Affairs.”

He said the mandate was remaining for VA health care personnel “to ensure the safety of veterans and our colleagues.”

Mr. McDonough did not cite any studies or other data. A VA spokesperson declined to provide any data that was reviewed when deciding not to rescind the mandate. The Epoch Times submitted a Freedom of Information Act for “all documents outlining which data was relied upon when establishing the mandate when deciding to keep the mandate in place.”

The agency searched for such data and did not find any.

The VA does not even attempt to justify its policies with science, because it can’t,” Leslie Manookian, president and founder of the Health Freedom Defense Fund, told The Epoch Times.

“The VA just trusts that the process and cost of challenging its unfounded policies is so onerous, most people are dissuaded from even trying,” she added.

The VA’s mandate remains in place to this day.

The VA’s website claims that vaccines “help protect you from getting severe illness” and “offer good protection against most COVID-19 variants,” pointing in part to observational data from the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) that estimate the vaccines provide poor protection against symptomatic infection and transient shielding against hospitalization.

There have also been increasing concerns among outside scientists about confirmed side effects like heart inflammation—the VA hid a safety signal it detected for the inflammation—and possible side effects such as tinnitus, which shift the benefit-risk calculus.

President Joe Biden imposed a slate of COVID-19 vaccine mandates in 2021. The VA was the first federal agency to implement a mandate.

President Biden rescinded the mandates in May 2023, citing a drop in COVID-19 cases and hospitalizations. His administration maintains the choice to require vaccines was the right one and saved lives.

“Our administration’s vaccination requirements helped ensure the safety of workers in critical workforces including those in the healthcare and education sectors, protecting themselves and the populations they serve, and strengthening their ability to provide services without disruptions to operations,” the White House said.

Some experts said requiring vaccination meant many younger people were forced to get a vaccine despite the risks potentially outweighing the benefits, leaving fewer doses for older adults.

By mandating the vaccines to younger people and those with natural immunity from having had COVID, older people in the U.S. and other countries did not have access to them, and many people might have died because of that,” Martin Kulldorff, a professor of medicine on leave from Harvard Medical School, told The Epoch Times previously.

The VA was one of just a handful of agencies to keep its mandate in place following the removal of many federal mandates.

“At this time, the vaccine requirement will remain in effect for VA health care personnel, including VA psychologists, pharmacists, social workers, nursing assistants, physical therapists, respiratory therapists, peer specialists, medical support assistants, engineers, housekeepers, and other clinical, administrative, and infrastructure support employees,” Mr. McDonough wrote to VA employees at the time.

This also includes VA volunteers and contractors. Effectively, this means that any Veterans Health Administration (VHA) employee, volunteer, or contractor who works in VHA facilities, visits VHA facilities, or provides direct care to those we serve will still be subject to the vaccine requirement at this time,” he said. “We continue to monitor and discuss this requirement, and we will provide more information about the vaccination requirements for VA health care employees soon. As always, we will process requests for vaccination exceptions in accordance with applicable laws, regulations, and policies.”

The version of the shots cleared in the fall of 2022, and available through the fall of 2023, did not have any clinical trial data supporting them.

A new version was approved in the fall of 2023 because there were indications that the shots not only offered temporary protection but also that the level of protection was lower than what was observed during earlier stages of the pandemic.

Ms. Manookian, whose group has challenged several of the federal mandates, said that the mandate “illustrates the dangers of the administrative state and how these federal agencies have become a law unto themselves.”

Tyler Durden Sat, 03/09/2024 - 22:10

Read More

Continue Reading

Spread & Containment

The Coming Of The Police State In America

The Coming Of The Police State In America

Authored by Jeffrey Tucker via The Epoch Times,

The National Guard and the State Police are now…

Published

on

The Coming Of The Police State In America

Authored by Jeffrey Tucker via The Epoch Times,

The National Guard and the State Police are now patrolling the New York City subway system in an attempt to do something about the explosion of crime. As part of this, there are bag checks and new surveillance of all passengers. No legislation, no debate, just an edict from the mayor.

Many citizens who rely on this system for transportation might welcome this. It’s a city of strict gun control, and no one knows for sure if they have the right to defend themselves. Merchants have been harassed and even arrested for trying to stop looting and pillaging in their own shops.

The message has been sent: Only the police can do this job. Whether they do it or not is another matter.

Things on the subway system have gotten crazy. If you know it well, you can manage to travel safely, but visitors to the city who take the wrong train at the wrong time are taking grave risks.

In actual fact, it’s guaranteed that this will only end in confiscating knives and other things that people carry in order to protect themselves while leaving the actual criminals even more free to prey on citizens.

The law-abiding will suffer and the criminals will grow more numerous. It will not end well.

When you step back from the details, what we have is the dawning of a genuine police state in the United States. It only starts in New York City. Where is the Guard going to be deployed next? Anywhere is possible.

If the crime is bad enough, citizens will welcome it. It must have been this way in most times and places that when the police state arrives, the people cheer.

We will all have our own stories of how this came to be. Some might begin with the passage of the Patriot Act and the establishment of the Department of Homeland Security in 2001. Some will focus on gun control and the taking away of citizens’ rights to defend themselves.

My own version of events is closer in time. It began four years ago this month with lockdowns. That’s what shattered the capacity of civil society to function in the United States. Everything that has happened since follows like one domino tumbling after another.

It goes like this:

1) lockdown,

2) loss of moral compass and spreading of loneliness and nihilism,

3) rioting resulting from citizen frustration, 4) police absent because of ideological hectoring,

5) a rise in uncontrolled immigration/refugees,

6) an epidemic of ill health from substance abuse and otherwise,

7) businesses flee the city

8) cities fall into decay, and that results in

9) more surveillance and police state.

The 10th stage is the sacking of liberty and civilization itself.

It doesn’t fall out this way at every point in history, but this seems like a solid outline of what happened in this case. Four years is a very short period of time to see all of this unfold. But it is a fact that New York City was more-or-less civilized only four years ago. No one could have predicted that it would come to this so quickly.

But once the lockdowns happened, all bets were off. Here we had a policy that most directly trampled on all freedoms that we had taken for granted. Schools, businesses, and churches were slammed shut, with various levels of enforcement. The entire workforce was divided between essential and nonessential, and there was widespread confusion about who precisely was in charge of designating and enforcing this.

It felt like martial law at the time, as if all normal civilian law had been displaced by something else. That something had to do with public health, but there was clearly more going on, because suddenly our social media posts were censored and we were being asked to do things that made no sense, such as mask up for a virus that evaded mask protection and walk in only one direction in grocery aisles.

Vast amounts of the white-collar workforce stayed home—and their kids, too—until it became too much to bear. The city became a ghost town. Most U.S. cities were the same.

As the months of disaster rolled on, the captives were let out of their houses for the summer in order to protest racism but no other reason. As a way of excusing this, the same public health authorities said that racism was a virus as bad as COVID-19, so therefore it was permitted.

The protests had turned to riots in many cities, and the police were being defunded and discouraged to do anything about the problem. Citizens watched in horror as downtowns burned and drug-crazed freaks took over whole sections of cities. It was like every standard of decency had been zapped out of an entire swath of the population.

Meanwhile, large checks were arriving in people’s bank accounts, defying every normal economic expectation. How could people not be working and get their bank accounts more flush with cash than ever? There was a new law that didn’t even require that people pay rent. How weird was that? Even student loans didn’t need to be paid.

By the fall, recess from lockdown was over and everyone was told to go home again. But this time they had a job to do: They were supposed to vote. Not at the polling places, because going there would only spread germs, or so the media said. When the voting results finally came in, it was the absentee ballots that swung the election in favor of the opposition party that actually wanted more lockdowns and eventually pushed vaccine mandates on the whole population.

The new party in control took note of the large population movements out of cities and states that they controlled. This would have a large effect on voting patterns in the future. But they had a plan. They would open the borders to millions of people in the guise of caring for refugees. These new warm bodies would become voters in time and certainly count on the census when it came time to reapportion political power.

Meanwhile, the native population had begun to swim in ill health from substance abuse, widespread depression, and demoralization, plus vaccine injury. This increased dependency on the very institutions that had caused the problem in the first place: the medical/scientific establishment.

The rise of crime drove the small businesses out of the city. They had barely survived the lockdowns, but they certainly could not survive the crime epidemic. This undermined the tax base of the city and allowed the criminals to take further control.

The same cities became sanctuaries for the waves of migrants sacking the country, and partisan mayors actually used tax dollars to house these invaders in high-end hotels in the name of having compassion for the stranger. Citizens were pushed out to make way for rampaging migrant hordes, as incredible as this seems.

But with that, of course, crime rose ever further, inciting citizen anger and providing a pretext to bring in the police state in the form of the National Guard, now tasked with cracking down on crime in the transportation system.

What’s the next step? It’s probably already here: mass surveillance and censorship, plus ever-expanding police power. This will be accompanied by further population movements, as those with the means to do so flee the city and even the country and leave it for everyone else to suffer.

As I tell the story, all of this seems inevitable. It is not. It could have been stopped at any point. A wise and prudent political leadership could have admitted the error from the beginning and called on the country to rediscover freedom, decency, and the difference between right and wrong. But ego and pride stopped that from happening, and we are left with the consequences.

The government grows ever bigger and civil society ever less capable of managing itself in large urban centers. Disaster is unfolding in real time, mitigated only by a rising stock market and a financial system that has yet to fall apart completely.

Are we at the middle stages of total collapse, or at the point where the population and people in leadership positions wise up and decide to put an end to the downward slide? It’s hard to know. But this much we do know: There is a growing pocket of resistance out there that is fed up and refuses to sit by and watch this great country be sacked and taken over by everything it was set up to prevent.

Tyler Durden Sat, 03/09/2024 - 16:20

Read More

Continue Reading

Trending