Connect with us

Government

November 2023 Monthly

November may be an in-between month. It will be a month of
limited monetary policy actions and a period of heightened geopolitical
tensions. Fiscal policy…

Published

on

November may be an in-between month. It will be a month of limited monetary policy actions and a period of heightened geopolitical tensions. Fiscal policy may be more interesting, with a Japanese supplemental budget, more measures expected from China, and a debate in Europe over the re-implementation of the Stability and Growth Agreement. In the US, the drama that played out in the House of Representatives could still leave the federal government with insufficient spending authority.  

In light of recent geopolitical developments, Ray Dalio of Bridgewater was quoted suggesting that the odds of a world war were near 50%. Others simply recognize that the risks are the greatest in decades. And yet, the capital markets have been amazingly orderly. To be sure, there was some dramatic price action, like the nearly $64 (~3.4%) rally in gold prices on October 13 and the 6.2% rally in oil prices in the week after Hamas's attack and the dramatic rise of nearly 65 bp in the US 10-year yield since the September 19-20 Federal Reserve meeting.

The dollar had already snapped its 11-week rally against the Swiss franc in the first week of October, but the franc was the only G10 currency to appreciate against the dollar in the week after the Hamas attack and in October through the last full week of the month. The slightly higher than expected US September CPI (year-over-year rate was unchanged at 3.7% rather than decline as forecasted) halted the dollar's slide several days into the war. The dollar's dramatic price action on October 3 when the dollar briefly traded above JPY150 sparked speculation that the BOJ intervened, but it does not appear to be the case. While the market was reluctant to rechallenge the JPY150 level, it succeeded in pushing the greenback to new highs for the year on October 26 near JPY150.80. It elicited little more than verbal warnings from officials. For its part, China appears used formal and informal channels to manage the yuan's exchange rate. The dollar's strength is spurring other countries to support their currencies. 

The outperformance of the US economy remained stark in Q3. The initial official estimate is that the world's largest economy expanded by 4.9% at an annualized pace in Q3, which was faster than China's reported growth (0.9% quarter-over-quarter). Beijing has signaled more economic support will be forthcoming, while economists expected the US economy to slow dramatically. Japan is also putting together another economic package that will likely include tax rebates and an extension of subsidies for household use of electricity, cooking gas, and gasoline.  

Although many were critical of the Federal Reserve for not ending its extraordinary monetary stimulus before it did, several times during the cycle, the market has expected the central bank to pivot, but it has not. In September, the median projection reduced the number of cuts anticipated to two from four. The derivatives market (swaps and futures) favored three. However, once again, the market converged with the Fed rather than the other way around. Firm September CPI and retail sales seemed to sway it. Indeed, it appears that the soft-landing (no recession) and higher-for-longer (on rates) is the new consensus.

Yet, in fairness, soft-landing scenarios may be part of the cycle itself. Later in the cycle, the optimism is typically dashed, considering how many business cycles have ended without a recession and a meaningful rise in unemployment. One does not have to look far to see emerging headwinds, the tightening of credit, the cumulative effect of the rise in interest rates, the resumption of student loan debt servicing, and rising debt stress levels. Consumer spending increased faster than income for four consecutive months through September. That said, if there is no compelling evidence that these widely recognized headwinds are taking hold, the risk is of a December Fed hike, which the market sees as less than a 25% chance. This is especially true; it seems if US long-term rates pull back. 

Identifying the proper level of analysis in the recent geopolitical developments is difficult. Some see the rapprochement between Israel and Saudi Arabia (pipeline with US backing, though ironically relying on ports owned or managed by China) as having been sabotaged. Others suggest Russia's covert and indirect machinations are at work. There also are those who put recent events in the context of the long and brutal history of the two people.

There are several frozen conflicts, stalemates of sorts, if you will, with Israel-Palestine being the most explosive. Even before October 6, it looked like the earlier Armenia and Azerbaijan conflict was going to be renewed. The conflict is partly a result of Russia's weakness, not strength. Kosovo and Serbia tensions are reportedly rising. The US has stepped up in military presence off the coast of Korea to deter any escalation there. The flare-up of a number of fires is cited as evidence by some of the weaknesses or distractions of the chief firefighter, the US. Yet, there have been such claims for years, and even at the peak of the unipolar world, there were numerous conflicts. As the political scientist professor and author Paul Poast put it, "war is persistent but not prevalent." 

The threat of a broader war in the Middle East or Central Europe is part of the unknown knowns, but there is another risk we can pinpoint more precisely. November 17. The current spending authorization needs to be extended, or there will be a partial closure of the US federal government. In addition to many services not being available, more than 2 mln workers will be directly impacted, and the pay of 1.3 mln active-duty troops will be disrupted. Although a partial government shutdown will not impact Washington's ability to service its debt, Moody's, the last of the biggest three rating agencies to maintain a AAA rating for the US, has warned a shutdown would be credit negative. The struggle to choose a new speaker for the House of Representatives reflects an important split in the Republican Party, which may make a budget agreement difficult. There is also a reasonable chance that another short-term fix is agreed upon.

Moody's gives Italy the lowest of its investment-grade ratings. The outlook is negative, and the results of its review will be announced on November 17. It looks like a close call, even though S&P affirmed its rating for the country a few ago one-notch higher than Moody's. Italy's 2024 budget raised the deficit target to 4.3% from 3.7% six months ago. Moreover, to Meloni government is assuming 1.2% growth next year. The Bank of Italy's forecast is 0.8%, and the IMF's is 0.7%. Slower growth than the government expects would lift the size of the deficit. The government does not project meeting the 3% threshold until 2026. 

The third of the three large rating agencies, Fitch, will review Italy a week earlier, but its current rating is the same as S&P. A loss of investment grade status is highly unlikely. It recognized the government's budget as a significant loosening of fiscal policy. This may signal a change in the outlook from stable to negative. Moody's decision is more immediately important, and if it takes away Italy's investment grade rating, the market impact may be minimal for two reasons. First, Italy's bond yields have risen dramatically in recent weeks in absolute terms and relative to Germany. Second, it will not impair the use of Italian bonds as collateral in ECB operations. 

Between the sharp rise in US interest rates and the geopolitical developments, risk appetites were impaired. Emerging markets paid a steep price. The MSCI index of emerging market equities fell for the third consecutive month (~-4.5% in October) and is down slightly on the year. The losses have been concentrated in Asia Pacific, where China's CSI 300 is off almost 8% for the year and Hong Kong's Hang Seng is down about 12%. Central European and Latin American equities have fared better this year but struggled in October. The premium paid over the US, measured by the JP Morgan Emerging Market Bond Index widened slightly for the third consecutive month. Emerging market currencies mostly weakened. Latin American currencies, which outperformed earlier this year, generally underperformed in October. The Chilean and Mexican pesos were the weakest of the emerging market currencies, falling about 4.4% and 3.6%, respectively, against the dollar last month. After the Russian ruble, the Polish zloty was the strongest with a 3.5% gain, encouraged by the national election outcome and what is antcipated to be the freeing up of EU funds that had been blocked previously. 

Bannockburn's World Currency Index, a GDP-weighted basket of the currencies are the dozen largest economies, briefly fell to new multi-year lows in early October, slipping marginally through the low set in November 2022. It remains in its trough, suggesting new lows are likely, which in turn, means that the US dollar has not peaked in the spot market. We had thought it did, but the continued outperformance of the US economy, and the stream of poor news from Europe and Asia, while geopolitical tensions are elevated, may extend the dollar's run.

The Mexican peso (1.8% weighting in the BWCI) was the worst performer, with its roughly 3.7% decline. The Canadian dollar's loss of 2% was the most among currencies from high-income countries in the index. Outside of the Russian ruble (2.8%), which is a special case, only the Brazilian real (2.4%) gained against the dollar in October. appreciating by about 1.7%. 

The BWCI uses one-month forward currency rates. Converting the forwards to interest rates allows us to derive a funding index. The implied rate bottomed in April 2022 near -1.7%. It reached about 3.4% in November 2022. It fell to around 1.7% by the end of February 2023. The implied funding cost of the BWCI has soared to about 6.30% in October. Among the members of the BWCI, China may still cut rates, while Brazil has finished its tightening cycle has begun cutting rates. Russia will likely hike rates again, and, as we noted, Japan has lifted the upper band for the 10-year JGB but has not hiked overnight rates and its balance sheet continues to expand. The market sees the US and ECB cutting rates in late Q2 or early Q3, though the central banks have not ruled out an additional hike. Of the high-income countries in the index, Australia is seen to be the most likely to hike again.


U.S. Dollar: The outperformance of the US economy remains notable. It is a force lifting US rates and the dollar. Part of this is likely traced to its fiscal policy. For the fiscal year that ended at the end of September, the US budget deficit was 6.3% of GDP, after a 5.4% deficit last year. While revenues were weaker, expenditures (e.g., defense, health care, Social Security, and debt servicing costs) also rose. The deficit is expected to slip back below 6% in 2024. In contrast, the eurozone aggregate deficit is around 3.5% this year (3.6% in 2022) and may fall toward 3% next year. Japan's budget deficit is around 5.3%-5.5% after a 6.7% deficit in 2022. It is seen falling to around 4% next year. The Office for Budget Responsibility projects a UK budget deficit of 5.1% for the current fiscal year (from 4.3% in 2022) and narrowing to 3.2% in the next fiscal year. The other important support for the US economy comes from consumption. In Q3 GDP, consumption rose by 4.0% after a modest 0.8% growth in Q2. Still, with monthly consumption growth exceeding income growth in three of the four months through September, it does not look sustainable. And student debt servicing has resumed for the first time in three years, which is also seen hampering consumption. Debt stress levels are rising and credit conditions tightening, which also do not bode well for the critical engine of the US growth. The market looks for the economy to slow dramatically in Q4. The median forecast in Bloomberg's survey sees the economy slowing to below 1% annualized and not returning above 1% until Q3 24. The Federal Reserve appears to have signaled no change in rates at the meeting that concludes on November 1. It would be the second consecutive month on hold. The surge in US interest rates (50-60 bp on the 10-year yield since the last FOMC meeting that concluded on September 20), which Fed officials link rise of the term premium tightens financial conditions for the central bank. The December 2024 Fed funds futures contract implies an effective Fed funds rate of about 4.70% at the end of next year. It currently is 5.33%. This implies that market anticipates the two cuts the September Summary of Economic Projections (median) anticipated and about a 50% chance of a third cut. The Dollar Index set the high for the year on October 3 near 107.35. After rallying for 11 consecutive weeks through the end of Q3, it consolidated mostly above 105.50 in October. Although we had thought the early October high could be significant, the risk now seems to be a new high is recorded.


Euro: The economic impulses for the eurozone have not changed much in the past month. The economy appears to have stagnated, or worse, in Q3 and the outlook is not much better for Q4. Germany, the largest economy in the bloc is likely contracting slightly. Berlin and Paris stuck a deal that will allow government assistance for the French nuclear plants, but a larger agreement on the new fiscal rules remains elusive. Without an agreement by year-end the old rules come back, which seem to be somewhat harsher and less flexible than some of the proposals for the new. The European Central Bank does not meet in November, but the market thinks it is done. Last October, 1.5% jump in eurozone CPI will drop out of the 12-month comparison, slowing year-over-year pace to almost 3%. However, this may mark the low point until late Q1 24. Further out, the swaps market has fully discounted a rate cut by the end of H1 24. Risks to the eurozone seem biased to the downside in terms of geopolitics and economics. After declining almost 7.5% from mid-July through early October, the euro corrected higher last month. It stalled in late in October in front of $1.07, the upper end of the $1.0660-$1.0700 range we highlighted in last month. The risk is that the euro revisits the low for the year near $1.0450. 

(As of October 27, indicative closing prices, previous in parentheses)
Spot: $1.0565 ($1.0575) Median Bloomberg One-month forecast: $1.0650 ($1.0635) One-month forward: $1.0585 ($1.0580)   One-month implied vol: 6.7% (6.8%


Japanese Yen: The dollar traded above the JPY150 threshold three times in October. The first time (October 3) spurred price action than many observers thought could have been official intervention. The dollar dropped from about JPY150.15 to almost JPY147.40 in less than a quarter-of-an-hour. It recovered and settled slightly above JPY149.00. We are skeptical that it was intervention, but a Ministry of Finance report due shortly is authoritative. The second time (October 23), the dollar rose to about JPY150.10 and then retreated in an orderly and calm fashion. It rose through JPY150 on October 25 and reached JPY150.80 on October 26. In addition to the fear of intervention, it is also a common level of option strike. Participants may also have been reluctant to press further ahead of the Bank of Japan meeting on October 30-31. Some press accounts warn that the cap on the 1.0% cap on the 10-year bond could be lifted again. The yield has risen from around 0.50% at the end of July and 0.86% in late October. The BOJ has made unscheduled purchases to help steady the bond market and have made five-year loans to banks. Ostensibly, this offers low-yielding money to banks to buy bonds. This is understood to be complementing the Yield Curve Control. It was the sixth such operation this year. The BOJ will update its economic projections and inflation for the next fiscal year is likely to lifted to 2.0% or slightly higher. We look for the BOJ to standpat now but suspect the next move in December may not be an adjustment to the long end but rather to bring the overnight rate from -0.10% to zero. It has been negative since January 2016, but is effectively near -0.02%. Meanwhile, ahead of the supplemental budget that seems likely to include a modest tax rebate, Prime Minister Kishida announced that the gasoline, electricity, and household gas subsides that had already had already been extended to the end of the year will continue until the spring.

Spot: JPY149.65 (JPY149.35) Median Bloomberg One-month forecast: JPY147.20 (JPY146.85) One-month forward: JPY148.90 (JPY148.55) One-month implied vol: 8.1% (8.7%) 


British Pound: The UK economy contracted by 0.6% in July and grew by 0.2% in August. Without posting its strongest monthly growth since March, the economy may contract in Q3. Most economists look for a string of stagnant quarters running until Q2 24. On the other hand, better news is likely on the inflation front. Recall that in October 2022, consumer prices jumped 2.0%. It will drop out of the 12-month comparison. The year-over-year rate can fall from 6.7% in September to below 5.5% in October. However, the base effect turns somewhat less favorable until February-April 2024. Core prices and services prices are bound to prove stickier. The Bank of England meets on November 2. The swaps market looks for it to standpat (~95% probability) and has almost an 80% probability of it sitting tight in December too. Sterling fell to seven-month lows in early October (~$1.2035) and recovered by three-cents before falling back. That pullback was deeper than we expected, finding support near $1.2070. A retest of the lows cannot be ruled out until the $1.2335 area is overcome.

Spot: $1.2120 ($1.2200) Median Bloomberg One-month forecast: $1.2215 ($1.2305) One-month forward:  $1.2125 ($1.2205) One-month implied vol: 7.5% (7.6%) 


Canadian Dollar:  The economic contrast with the US and the risk-off sentiment weighed on the Canadian dollar in October. The US dollar rose to new seven-month against the Canadian dollar following the Bank of Canada meeting and reached CAD1.3845 after the strong Q3 US GDP the following day. The overnight rate was left unchanged at 5.00%, and although officials said they are prepared to hike rates again, if necessary, the market is skeptical. For example, the swaps market prices in slightly more than a 25% chance of a cut by the end of H1 24 compared with a roughly an 85% chance of a cut at the end of September. While the central bank raised its inflation forecasts and now sees CPI at 3.0% next year rather than 2.5%, it also cut its growth forecast to 0.9% from 1.2%. The economists in Bloomberg's survey see the Bank of Canada's growth forecast of 0.8% in Q3 and Q4 23 as too optimistic. The median projection is for growth of 0.5% and 0.4%, respectively. The US set the high for the year in March near CAD1.3860, and a move above there could spur gains toward the two-year high set in October 2022 almost CAD1.40. We suspect that it will take a broader setback in the US dollar and/or a strong recovery in risk appetites for the Canadian dollar to establish a floor. 

Spot: CAD1.3870 (CAD 1.3575) Median Bloomberg One-month forecast: CAD1.3675 (CAD1.3515) One-month forward: CAD1.3865 (CAD1.3580) One-month implied vol: 5.7% (5.8%) 


Australian Dollar: Among the G10 currencies, the dollar-bloc and Scandinavian currencies were the weakest performers in October. These currencies typically underperform in risk off environments. The Australian dollar fell to new lows for the year in October near $0.6285. In fact, it traded below $0.6300 eight times but only settled below it once. It looks like it is carving a base, but it needs to reestablish a foothold above $0.6450 to boost confidence that a durable low is in place. A break of $0.6250 could spur a return to last year's low near $0.6170. A smaller than expected decline in Q3 CPI spurred a shift in market expectations for the central policy. The odds of a hike at the November 7 meeting are now seen as a 50/50 proposition, double what it was before the CPI. The odds of a hike before the end of the year are near 75%. Yet, the economy is weakening. Australia lost full-time jobs in two of the past three months through September and preliminary October PMI composite tumbled by a large 4.2 index points to 47.3, the lowest since January 2022. Price pressures are also easing. The year-over-year rate has fallen from 7.8% in Q4 22 to 5.3% in Q3 23, and likely toward 4.5% in Q4 23.

Spot: $0.6335 ($0.6435) Median Bloomberg One-month forecast: $0.6420 ($0.6490) One-month forward $0.6340 ($0.6445)    One-month implied vol 9.9% (9.8%) 


Mexican Peso:  The peso fell for the third consecutive month in October, matching the longest decline since 2015. The driver seems to be a combination of market positioning and risk-off. In fact, the six most actively traded Latin American currencies have trended lower over the past three months. Still, since the start of 2022, the peso remains the world's strongest currency, appreciating about 13% against the greenback. The macro considerations, like the favorable interest rate pick-up and the near/friend-shoring meme remain intact. Although President AMLO is relaxing fiscal policy, monetary policy remains tight even as inflation falls. The central bank has signaled the overnight rate will remain at 11.25% for a protracted period, which the market suspects means well into next year. Major US equity indices have also fallen for the three months through October, and the nearly 100 bp rise in the US 10-year Treasury yield has dragged Mexican rates higher. Its 10-year dollar and peso bond yields have surged about 115 bp over the same time. The dollar reached a seven-month high against the peso in early October a little below MXN18.50. A break warns of the risk of a return to the MXN19.00 area, which dollar has not closed above since February, despite fraying the area on an intraday basis in March during the US bank stress. On the other hand, a dollar push below MXN17.75 would lift the peso's technical tone.

Spot: MXN18.11 (MXN17.42) Median Bloomberg One-Month forecast MXN17.95 (MXN17.39) One-month forward MXN18.22 (MXN17.52) One-month implied vol 13.9% (12.2%)

 

Chinese Yuan: China's economy appears to be doing a bit better, but the weight of the property market remains a drag. Country Garden has defaulted on a dollar bond. More economic measures are likely to be announced and a cut in rates or reserve requirements is still possible before year-end. Local governments will be able to draw on next year's bond-issuance quota and the central government's deficit will be allowed to rise to 3.8% from the 3% target announced in March. The strong-arm of the state continues to make foreign investors wary. The Foxconn probe, the detention of three employees from WPP, and formal charges of espionage been brought against an executive from Astellas Pharma does not sit well. The employee of a Japanese trading company was detained in March and there is still not public acknowledgement or indication of specific charges. October's trading was shortened by the national holidays, and the dollar traded between about CNY7.27 and CNY7.3185, well inside the September range (~CNY7.24-CNY7.35). The PBOC continues to use the fix to limit the dollar's strength. It is difficult to tell what the large state-owned banks do for their own account and customers and what is done on behalf of the central bank but press reports have noted their dollar selling activity. A meeting between Biden and Xi on the sideline of the APEC summit in mid-November remains possible though it has not yet been confirmed.

Spot: CNY7.3175 (CNY7.2980) Median Bloomberg One-month forecast CNY7.2820 (CNY7.2800) One-month forward CNY7.2020 (CNY7.1960) One-month implied vol 5.1% (5.2%) 




Read More

Continue Reading

Government

Supreme Court Rules Public Officials May Block Their Constituents On Social Media

Supreme Court Rules Public Officials May Block Their Constituents On Social Media

Authored by Matthew Vadum via The Epoch Times (emphasis…

Published

on

Supreme Court Rules Public Officials May Block Their Constituents On Social Media

Authored by Matthew Vadum via The Epoch Times (emphasis ours),

Public officials may block people on social media in certain situations, the Supreme Court ruled unanimously on March 15.

People leave the U.S. Supreme Court in Washington on Feb. 21, 2024. (Kevin Dietsch/Getty Images)

At the same time, the court held that public officials who post about topics pertaining to their work on their personal social media accounts are acting on behalf of the government. But such officials can be found liable for violating the First Amendment only when they have been properly authorized by the government to communicate on its behalf.

The case is important because nowadays public officials routinely reach out to voters through social media on the same pages where they discuss personal matters unrelated to government business.

When a government official posts about job-related topics on social media, it can be difficult to tell whether the speech is official or private,” Justice Amy Coney Barrett wrote for the nation’s highest court.

The case is separate from but brings to mind a lawsuit that several individuals previously filed against former President Donald Trump after he blocked them from accessing his social media account on Twitter, which was later renamed X. The Supreme Court dismissed that case, Biden v. Knight First Amendment Institute, in April 2021 as moot because President Trump had already left office.

At the time of the ruling, the then-Twitter had banned President Trump. When Elon Musk took over the company he reversed that policy.

The new decision in Lindke v. Freed was written by Justice Amy Coney Barrett.

Respondent James Freed, the city manager of Port Huron, Michigan, used a public Facebook account to communicate with his constituents. Petitioner Kevin Lindke, a resident of Port Huron, criticized the municipality’s response to the COVID-19 pandemic, including accusations of hypocrisy by local officials.

Mr. Freed blocked Mr. Lindke and others and removed their comments, according to Mr. Lindke’s petition.

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the 6th Circuit ruled for Mr. Freed, finding that he was acting only in a personal capacity and that his activities did not constitute governmental action.

Mr. Freed’s attorney, Victoria Ferres, said during oral arguments before the Supreme Court on Oct. 31, 2023, that her client didn’t give up his rights when using social media.

This country’s 21 million government employees should have the right to talk publicly about their jobs on personal social media accounts like their private-sector counterparts.”

The position advocated by the other side would unfairly punish government officials, and “will result in uncertainty and self-censorship for this country’s government employees despite this Court repeatedly finding that government employees do not lose their rights merely by virtue of public employment,” she said.

In Lindke v. Freed, the Supreme Court found that a public official who prevents a person from comments on the official’s social media pages engages in governmental action under Section 1983 only if the official had “actual authority” to speak on the government’s behalf on a specific matter and if the official claimed to exercise that authority when speaking in the relevant social media posts.

Section 1983 refers to Title 42, U.S. Code, Section 1983, which allows people to sue government actors for deprivation of civil rights.

Justice Barrett wrote that according to the so-called state action doctrine, the test for “actual authority” must be “rooted in written law or longstanding custom to speak for the State.”

“That authority must extend to speech of the sort that caused the alleged rights deprivation. If the plaintiff cannot make this threshold showing of authority, he cannot establish state action.”

“For social-media activity to constitute state action, an official must not only have state authority—he must also purport to use it,” the justice continued.

State officials have a choice about the capacity in which they choose to speak.

Citing previous precedent, Justice Barrett wrote that generally a public employee claiming to speak on behalf of the government acts with state authority when he speaks “in his official capacity or” when he uses his speech to carry out “his responsibilities pursuant to state law.”

“If the public employee does not use his speech in furtherance of his official responsibilities, he is speaking in his own voice.”

The Supreme Court remanded the case to the 6th Circuit with instructions to vacate its judgment and ordered it to conduct “further proceedings consistent with this opinion.”

Also on March 15, the Supreme Court ruled on O’Connor-Ratcliff v. Garnier, a related case. The court’s sparse, unanimous opinion was unsigned.

Petitioners Michelle O’Connor-Ratcliff and T.J. Zane were two elected members of the Poway Unified School District Board of Trustees in California who used their personal Facebook and Twitter accounts to communicate with the public.

Respondents Christopher Garnier and Kimberly Garnier, parents of local students, “spammed Petitioners’ posts and tweets with repetitive comments and replies” so the school board members blocked the respondents from the accounts, according to the petition filed by Ms. O’Connor-Ratcliff and Mr. Zane.

But the Garniers said they were acting in good faith.

“The Garniers left comments exposing financial mismanagement by the former superintendent as well as incidents of racism,” the couple said in a brief.

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit found in favor of the Garniers, holding that elected officials using social media accounts were participating in a public forum.

The Supreme Court ruled in a three-page opinion that because the 9th Circuit deviated from the standard the high court articulated in Lindke v. Freed, the 9th Circuit’s decision must be vacated.

The case was remanded to the 9th Circuit “for further proceedings consistent with our opinion” in the Lindke case, the Supreme Court stated.

Tyler Durden Sun, 03/17/2024 - 22:10

Read More

Continue Reading

International

Home buyers must now navigate higher mortgage rates and prices

Rates under 4% came and went during the Covid pandemic, but home prices soared. Here’s what buyers and sellers face as the housing season ramps up.

Published

on

Springtime is spreading across the country. You can see it as daffodil, camellia, tulip and other blossoms start to emerge. 

You can also see it in the increasing number of for sale signs popping up in front of homes, along with the painting, gardening and general sprucing up as buyers get ready to sell. 

Which leads to two questions: 

  • How is the real estate market this spring? 
  • Where are mortgage rates? 

What buyers and sellers face

The housing market is bedeviled with supply shortages, high prices and slow sales.

Mortgage rates are still high and may limit what a buyer can offer and a seller can expect.  

Related: Analyst warns that a TikTok ban could lead to major trouble for Apple, Big Tech

And there's a factor not expected that may affect the sales process. Fixed commission rates on home sales are going away in July.

Reports this week and in a week will make the situation clearer for buyers and sellers. 

The reports are:

  • Housing starts from the U.S. Commerce Department due Tuesday. The consensus estimate is for a seasonally adjusted rate of about 1.4 million homes. These would include apartments, both rentals and condominiums. 
  • Existing home sales, due Thursday from the National Association of Realtors. The consensus estimate is for a seasonally adjusted sales rate of about 4 million homes. In 2023, some 4.1 million homes were sold, the worst sales rate since 1995. 
  • New-home sales and prices, due Monday from the Commerce Department. Analysts are expecting a sales rate of 661,000 homes (including condos), up 1.5% from a year ago.

Here is what buyers and sellers need to know about the situation. 

Mortgage rates will stay above 5% 

That's what most analysts believe. Right now, the rate on a 30-year mortgage is between 6.7% and 7%. 

Rates peaked at 8% in October after the Federal Reserve signaled it was done raising interest rates.

The Freddie Mac Primary Mortgage Market Survey of March 14 was at 6.74%. 

Freddie Mac buys mortgages from lenders and sells securities to investors. The effect is to replenish lenders' cash levels to make more loans. 

A hotter-than-expected Producer Price Index released that day has pushed quotes to 7% or higher, according to data from Mortgage News Daily, which tracks mortgage markets.

Home buyers must navigate higher mortgage rates and prices this spring.

TheStreet

On a median-priced home (price: $380,000) and a 20% down payment, that means a principal and interest rate payment of $2,022. The payment  does not include taxes and insurance.

Last fall when the 30-year rate hit 8%, the payment would have been $2,230. 

In 2021, the average rate was 2.96%, which translated into a payment of $1,275. 

Short of a depression, that's a rate that won't happen in most of our lifetimes. 

Most economists believe current rates will fall to around 6.3% by the end of the year, maybe lower, depending on how many times the Federal Reserve cuts rates this year. 

If 6%, the payment on our median-priced home is $1,823.

But under 5%, absent a nasty recession, fuhgettaboutit.

Supply will be tight, keeping prices up

Two factors are affecting the supply of homes for sale in just about every market.

First: Homeowners who had been able to land a mortgage at 2.96% are very reluctant to sell because they would then have to find a home they could afford with, probably, a higher-cost mortgage.

More economic news:

Second, the combination of high prices and high mortgage rates are freezing out thousands of potential buyers, especially those looking for homes in lower price ranges.

Indeed, The Wall Street Journal noted that online brokerage Redfin said only about 20% of homes for sale in February were affordable for the typical household.

And here mortgage rates can play one last nasty trick. If rates fall, that means a buyer can afford to pay more. Sellers and their real-estate agents know this too, and may ask for a higher price. 

Covid's last laugh: An inflation surge

Mortgage rates jumped to 8% or higher because since 2022 the Federal Reserve has been fighting to knock inflation down to 2% a year. Raising interest rates was the ammunition to battle rising prices.

In June 2022, the consumer price index was 9.1% higher than a year earlier. 

The causes of the worst inflation since the 1970s were: 

  • Covid-19 pandemic, which caused the global economy to shut down in 2020. When Covid ebbed and people got back to living their lives, getting global supply chains back to normal operation proved difficult. 
  • Oil prices jumped to record levels because of the recovery from the pandemic recovery and Russia's invasion of Ukraine.

What the changes in commissions means

The long-standing practice of paying real-estate agents will be retired this summer, after the National Association of Realtors settled a long and bitter legal fight.

No longer will the seller necessarily pay 6% of the sale price to split between buyer and seller agents.

Both sellers and buyers will have to negotiate separately the services agents have charged for 100 years or more. These include pre-screening properties, writing sales contracts, and the like. The change will continue a trend of adding costs and complications to the process of buying or selling a home.

Already, interest rates are a complication. In addition, homeowners insurance has become very pricey, especially in communities vulnerable to hurricanes, tornadoes, and forest fires. Florida homeowners have seen premiums jump more than 102% in the last three years. A policy now costs three times more than the national average.

Related: Veteran fund manager picks favorite stocks for 2024

 

Read More

Continue Reading

International

Mistakes Were Made

Mistakes Were Made

Authored by C.J.Hopkins via The Consent Factory,

Make fun of the Germans all you want, and I’ve certainly done that…

Published

on

Mistakes Were Made

Authored by C.J.Hopkins via The Consent Factory,

Make fun of the Germans all you want, and I’ve certainly done that a bit during these past few years, but, if there’s one thing they’re exceptionally good at, it’s taking responsibility for their mistakes. Seriously, when it comes to acknowledging one’s mistakes, and not rationalizing, or minimizing, or attempting to deny them, and any discomfort they may have allegedly caused, no one does it quite like the Germans.

Take this Covid mess, for example. Just last week, the German authorities confessed that they made a few minor mistakes during their management of the “Covid pandemic.” According to Karl Lauterbach, the Minister of Health, “we were sometimes too strict with the children and probably started easing the restrictions a little too late.” Horst Seehofer, the former Interior Minister, admitted that he would no longer agree to some of the Covid restrictions today, for example, nationwide nighttime curfews. “One must be very careful with calls for compulsory vaccination,” he added. Helge Braun, Head of the Chancellery and Minister for Special Affairs under Merkel, agreed that there had been “misjudgments,” for example, “overestimating the effectiveness of the vaccines.”

This display of the German authorities’ unwavering commitment to transparency and honesty, and the principle of personal honor that guides the German authorities in all their affairs, and that is deeply ingrained in the German character, was published in a piece called “The Divisive Virus” in Der Spiegel, and immediately widely disseminated by the rest of the German state and corporate media in a totally organic manner which did not in any way resemble one enormous Goebbelsian keyboard instrument pumping out official propaganda in perfect synchronization, or anything creepy and fascistic like that.

Germany, after all, is “an extremely democratic state,” with freedom of speech and the press and all that, not some kind of totalitarian country where the masses are inundated with official propaganda and critics of the government are dragged into criminal court and prosecuted on trumped-up “hate crime” charges.

OK, sure, in a non-democratic totalitarian system, such public “admissions of mistakes” — and the synchronized dissemination thereof by the media — would just be a part of the process of whitewashing the authorities’ fascistic behavior during some particularly totalitarian phase of transforming society into whatever totalitarian dystopia they were trying to transform it into (for example, a three-year-long “state of emergency,” which they declared to keep the masses terrorized and cooperative while they stripped them of their democratic rights, i.e., the ones they hadn’t already stripped them of, and conditioned them to mindlessly follow orders, and robotically repeat nonsensical official slogans, and vent their impotent hatred and fear at the new “Untermenschen” or “counter-revolutionaries”), but that is obviously not the case here.

No, this is definitely not the German authorities staging a public “accountability” spectacle in order to memory-hole what happened during 2020-2023 and enshrine the official narrative in history. There’s going to be a formal “Inquiry Commission” — conducted by the same German authorities that managed the “crisis” — which will get to the bottom of all the regrettable but completely understandable “mistakes” that were made in the heat of the heroic battle against The Divisive Virus!

OK, calm down, all you “conspiracy theorists,” “Covid deniers,” and “anti-vaxxers.” This isn’t going to be like the Nuremberg Trials. No one is going to get taken out and hanged. It’s about identifying and acknowledging mistakes, and learning from them, so that the authorities can manage everything better during the next “pandemic,” or “climate emergency,” or “terrorist attack,” or “insurrection,” or whatever.

For example, the Inquiry Commission will want to look into how the government accidentally declared a Nationwide State of Pandemic Emergency and revised the Infection Protection Act, suspending the German constitution and granting the government the power to rule by decree, on account of a respiratory virus that clearly posed no threat to society at large, and then unleashed police goon squads on the thousands of people who gathered outside the Reichstag to protest the revocation of their constitutional rights.

Once they do, I’m sure they’ll find that that “mistake” bears absolutely no resemblance to the Enabling Act of 1933, which suspended the German constitution and granted the government the power to rule by decree, after the Nazis declared a nationwide “state of emergency.”

Another thing the Commission will probably want to look into is how the German authorities accidentally banned any further demonstrations against their arbitrary decrees, and ordered the police to brutalize anyone participating in such “illegal demonstrations.”

And, while the Commission is inquiring into the possibly slightly inappropriate behavior of their law enforcement officials, they might want to also take a look at the behavior of their unofficial goon squads, like Antifa, which they accidentally encouraged to attack the “anti-vaxxers,” the “Covid deniers,” and anyone brandishing a copy of the German constitution.

Come to think of it, the Inquiry Commission might also want to look into how the German authorities, and the overwhelming majority of the state and corporate media, accidentally systematically fomented mass hatred of anyone who dared to question the government’s arbitrary and nonsensical decrees or who refused to submit to “vaccination,” and publicly demonized us as “Corona deniers,” “conspiracy theorists,” “anti-vaxxers,” “far-right anti-Semites,” etc., to the point where mainstream German celebrities like Sarah Bosetti were literally describing us as the inessential “appendix” in the body of the nation, quoting an infamous Nazi almost verbatim.

And then there’s the whole “vaccination” business. The Commission will certainly want to inquire into that. They will probably want to start their inquiry with Karl Lauterbach, and determine exactly how he accidentally lied to the public, over and over, and over again …

And whipped people up into a mass hysteria over “KILLER VARIANTS” …

And “LONG COVID BRAIN ATTACKS” …

And how “THE UNVACCINATED ARE HOLDING THE WHOLE COUNTRY HOSTAGE, SO WE NEED TO FORCIBLY VACCINATE EVERYONE!”

And so on. I could go on with this all day, but it will be much easier to just refer you, and the Commission, to this documentary film by Aya Velázquez. Non-German readers may want to skip to the second half, unless they’re interested in the German “Corona Expert Council” …

Look, the point is, everybody makes “mistakes,” especially during a “state of emergency,” or a war, or some other type of global “crisis.” At least we can always count on the Germans to step up and take responsibility for theirs, and not claim that they didn’t know what was happening, or that they were “just following orders,” or that “the science changed.”

Plus, all this Covid stuff is ancient history, and, as Olaf, an editor at Der Spiegel, reminds us, it’s time to put the “The Divisive Pandemic” behind us …

… and click heels, and heil the New Normal Democracy!

Tyler Durden Sat, 03/16/2024 - 23:20

Read More

Continue Reading

Trending