Connect with us

Uncategorized

Meet a Former Wall Street Executive Who Became a Burger ‘Pop-Up’ Icon

With the third Defender Service Awards underway, we met up with an emerging burger baron who’s making a big difference — and revolutionizing the burger…

Published

on

This article was produced in partnership with Land Rover.

It’s not every day you see someone pivot from billionaires, basis points, and bearer bonds to making tasty cheeseburgers for the public.

Pop-up burger icon Mike Puma shows off his tasty creation.

Mike Puma

That’s exactly the case with former Wall Street senior executive Mike Puma, who’s left the financial sector behind to don an apron and cook gourmet-level burgers for New Yorkers. In the process, Puma is raising money for his favorite charitable causes while running regular “pop-up” burger events all over the Big Apple – and is opening his first burger eatery in New York’s Lower East Side.

Selfless difference-makers like Puma are exactly why the Defender Service Awards, now in its third year, resonate so much. The awards celebrate the often-unsung heroes who are creating meaningful change in their communities, across a variety of categories from social issues to civil service to environmental conservation. This year's Defender Service Awards nomination period runs from June 15 to July 21, 2023.

Category finalists will receive $7,500 ($5,000 from CHASE and $2,500 from Warner Bros. Discovery), while category winners receive $25,000 and a custom Land Rover Defender 130.

Anyone can refer a nonprofit by entering the organization’s name and email contact in the Defender Service Awards online form. The nonprofit will then receive information on how to enter, by submitting a video up to three minutes in length that showcases their service work and explains how a Defender 130 vehicle would help support their cause.

To shine a light on the Defender Service Awards this year, we tracked down Mike Puma at his New York City home. We asked him how a career shift from managing money on Wall Street to cooking burgers on the street has changed his life and what that means to him as a community leader and to the multiple charities he favors.

TheStreet: How did you start out on Wall Street?

Mike Puma: I was born and raised in Long Island, New York, and moved to Connecticut in high school, which was a huge transition for me coming from Long Island in the 1980s. I went to St Bonaventure University where I studied marketing and was president of my class.

The opportunity to work on Wall Street was presented to me by an early career colleague and I wound up going to work for Oppenheimer & Co. No doubt, Wall Street was exciting and fast-paced, and I experienced many ups and downs. I've seen everything from a financial collapse to the 9/11 terrorist attacks, to a global pandemic and many more over my career. I was getting less excited about being behind a desk so I retired from Oppenheimer after 25 years with the firm as a director.

TheStreet: What triggered your passion for eating– and then cooking – high-end burgers?

I started the Gotham Burger Social Club in 2013 with the simple idea of a burger tour with friends. I had posted a magazine cover about the best burgers in NYC and asked people I knew on Facebook who wanted to join. The response was incredible.

Our first meet-up group was in October, 2013. From our first club meeting, I thought it would be fun to chronicle our antics and started my Instagram page on the burger tours. I started posting pictures of the food, and the restaurants we visited and shared reviews of burgers and other things about the club I loved.

It was all organic with the Gotham Burger Social Club – it was really a place for guys to taste different burgers across the city and swap stories. We started with the idea of going on a burger tour once a month and writing up a review. Word got out and the awareness of the club grew and grew, which really opened up opportunities for us. I wasn’t operating the club to be a burger-biting "influencer" – I don’t think that term was even around when we started the club. I was doing it out of fun and a passion for food and people gravitated towards my honesty and authenticity.

TheStreet: How did your love for burgers merge with your starting your own burger “pop-up” restaurant business?

As our club meetings grew, opportunities began opening up on the business front and on the community service front. We started creating “pop-up” burger events where I’d cook burgers with a fundraiser for Social Tees Animal Rescue. That led to more fundraisers and events over the years. Our burger was so well received with people sometimes lined up for blocks to try one out. They were shocked I didn't have a physical restaurant of my own. That wasn’t in my thought process yet as my focus was still on my career as a financial advisor. Yet when the pandemic and the lockdowns happened in 2020, there were no restaurants to visit, guys were moving and working from home so reviews were put on hold. 

Eventually, the requests to do Pop-Up events came from bars and restaurants like Rays, Marshall Stack, Hotel Chantel, and Pig Beach. They saw it as a way to help their business. Since I had the time and thought it would be fun and a great way to help local businesses out. It was then our signature burger, called the “Gotham Smash”, was born and it really took off. We became the most successful pop-up eatery in New York City as we made it more than just a place to get a burger. It really became a lifeline for New Yorkers and it also became a thriving business during a tough time. People would spend hours in line and be happy to wait, with everyone sharing some cocktails and music. Eventually media outlets began to list us as one of the best new burgers in New York City and we took home the People's Choice Award for the “best burger” at the South Beach Wine & Food Festival in 2020. Three years later we’re opening our first restaurant, called the Gotham Burger Social Club, in New York City.

Mike Puma

TheStreet: Have there been any lessons learned in transitioning from finance to entrepreneur with your pop-up burger and your upcoming restaurant?

My experience in Wall Street helped develop a business plan and taught me how to hustle and deal with adversity. There are so many challenges when doing pop-up's that you need to be prepared and always have a plan “B” and even a plan “C”. Fortunately from the start, we have always sold out our events, so that we’re controlling costs. As we’ve grown, our pop-ups have doubled and tripled in size to meet demand. 

That said, we are aware that people come for the burger but stay for the whole experience - it's about community and connecting with people. If someone is willing to come out and eat my food and wait over an hour to do so, I need to make sure they walk away with the best experience possible. That’s why we’re opening our first location in the Lower East Side of New York City. Most of our pop-ups have been in the Lower East Side – it only made sense that our first location should be in the community that embraced us.

TheStreet: You’ve been a big part of some amazing charitable endeavors with your burger pop-ups. What community organizations inspire you, and why these and other organizations are near and dear to your heart?

A big part of our history is giving back. When I started cooking and serving the Gotham Smash burger it was almost entirely for charities. We worked with Social Tees Animal Rescue, New York Bully Crew, The Jeff Michner Foundation, Carl Ruiz Foundation, and Tailgate With A Cause, among other charities. As an animal lover and as a parent, I always have a special interest in helping rescue organizations.

TheStreet: What do the Land Rover Defender Service Awards mean to you and why do they matter to you?

Non-profits have such a tough time and need resources to succeed and execute. The Defender Service Awards gives these organizations the recognition and help they need to serve their communities. After all, when you get involved and give back there is no better feeling in the world!

Read More

Continue Reading

Uncategorized

February Employment Situation

By Paul Gomme and Peter Rupert The establishment data from the BLS showed a 275,000 increase in payroll employment for February, outpacing the 230,000…

Published

on

By Paul Gomme and Peter Rupert

The establishment data from the BLS showed a 275,000 increase in payroll employment for February, outpacing the 230,000 average over the previous 12 months. The payroll data for January and December were revised down by a total of 167,000. The private sector added 223,000 new jobs, the largest gain since May of last year.

Temporary help services employment continues a steep decline after a sharp post-pandemic rise.

Average hours of work increased from 34.2 to 34.3. The increase, along with the 223,000 private employment increase led to a hefty increase in total hours of 5.6% at an annualized rate, also the largest increase since May of last year.

The establishment report, once again, beat “expectations;” the WSJ survey of economists was 198,000. Other than the downward revisions, mentioned above, another bit of negative news was a smallish increase in wage growth, from $34.52 to $34.57.

The household survey shows that the labor force increased 150,000, a drop in employment of 184,000 and an increase in the number of unemployed persons of 334,000. The labor force participation rate held steady at 62.5, the employment to population ratio decreased from 60.2 to 60.1 and the unemployment rate increased from 3.66 to 3.86. Remember that the unemployment rate is the number of unemployed relative to the labor force (the number employed plus the number unemployed). Consequently, the unemployment rate can go up if the number of unemployed rises holding fixed the labor force, or if the labor force shrinks holding the number unemployed unchanged. An increase in the unemployment rate is not necessarily a bad thing: it may reflect a strong labor market drawing “marginally attached” individuals from outside the labor force. Indeed, there was a 96,000 decline in those workers.

Earlier in the week, the BLS announced JOLTS (Job Openings and Labor Turnover Survey) data for January. There isn’t much to report here as the job openings changed little at 8.9 million, the number of hires and total separations were little changed at 5.7 million and 5.3 million, respectively.

As has been the case for the last couple of years, the number of job openings remains higher than the number of unemployed persons.

Also earlier in the week the BLS announced that productivity increased 3.2% in the 4th quarter with output rising 3.5% and hours of work rising 0.3%.

The bottom line is that the labor market continues its surprisingly (to some) strong performance, once again proving stronger than many had expected. This strength makes it difficult to justify any interest rate cuts soon, particularly given the recent inflation spike.

Read More

Continue Reading

Uncategorized

Mortgage rates fall as labor market normalizes

Jobless claims show an expanding economy. We will only be in a recession once jobless claims exceed 323,000 on a four-week moving average.

Published

on

Everyone was waiting to see if this week’s jobs report would send mortgage rates higher, which is what happened last month. Instead, the 10-year yield had a muted response after the headline number beat estimates, but we have negative job revisions from previous months. The Federal Reserve’s fear of wage growth spiraling out of control hasn’t materialized for over two years now and the unemployment rate ticked up to 3.9%. For now, we can say the labor market isn’t tight anymore, but it’s also not breaking.

The key labor data line in this expansion is the weekly jobless claims report. Jobless claims show an expanding economy that has not lost jobs yet. We will only be in a recession once jobless claims exceed 323,000 on a four-week moving average.

From the Fed: In the week ended March 2, initial claims for unemployment insurance benefits were flat, at 217,000. The four-week moving average declined slightly by 750, to 212,250


Below is an explanation of how we got here with the labor market, which all started during COVID-19.

1. I wrote the COVID-19 recovery model on April 7, 2020, and retired it on Dec. 9, 2020. By that time, the upfront recovery phase was done, and I needed to model out when we would get the jobs lost back.

2. Early in the labor market recovery, when we saw weaker job reports, I doubled and tripled down on my assertion that job openings would get to 10 million in this recovery. Job openings rose as high as to 12 million and are currently over 9 million. Even with the massive miss on a job report in May 2021, I didn’t waver.

Currently, the jobs openings, quit percentage and hires data are below pre-COVID-19 levels, which means the labor market isn’t as tight as it once was, and this is why the employment cost index has been slowing data to move along the quits percentage.  

2-US_Job_Quits_Rate-1-2

3. I wrote that we should get back all the jobs lost to COVID-19 by September of 2022. At the time this would be a speedy labor market recovery, and it happened on schedule, too

Total employment data

4. This is the key one for right now: If COVID-19 hadn’t happened, we would have between 157 million and 159 million jobs today, which would have been in line with the job growth rate in February 2020. Today, we are at 157,808,000. This is important because job growth should be cooling down now. We are more in line with where the labor market should be when averaging 140K-165K monthly. So for now, the fact that we aren’t trending between 140K-165K means we still have a bit more recovery kick left before we get down to those levels. 




From BLS: Total nonfarm payroll employment rose by 275,000 in February, and the unemployment rate increased to 3.9 percent, the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics reported today. Job gains occurred in health care, in government, in food services and drinking places, in social assistance, and in transportation and warehousing.

Here are the jobs that were created and lost in the previous month:

IMG_5092

In this jobs report, the unemployment rate for education levels looks like this:

  • Less than a high school diploma: 6.1%
  • High school graduate and no college: 4.2%
  • Some college or associate degree: 3.1%
  • Bachelor’s degree or higher: 2.2%
IMG_5093_320f22

Today’s report has continued the trend of the labor data beating my expectations, only because I am looking for the jobs data to slow down to a level of 140K-165K, which hasn’t happened yet. I wouldn’t categorize the labor market as being tight anymore because of the quits ratio and the hires data in the job openings report. This also shows itself in the employment cost index as well. These are key data lines for the Fed and the reason we are going to see three rate cuts this year.

Read More

Continue Reading

Uncategorized

Inside The Most Ridiculous Jobs Report In History: Record 1.2 Million Immigrant Jobs Added In One Month

Inside The Most Ridiculous Jobs Report In History: Record 1.2 Million Immigrant Jobs Added In One Month

Last month we though that the January…

Published

on

Inside The Most Ridiculous Jobs Report In History: Record 1.2 Million Immigrant Jobs Added In One Month

Last month we though that the January jobs report was the "most ridiculous in recent history" but, boy, were we wrong because this morning the Biden department of goalseeked propaganda (aka BLS) published the February jobs report, and holy crap was that something else. Even Goebbels would blush. 

What happened? Let's take a closer look.

On the surface, it was (almost) another blockbuster jobs report, certainly one which nobody expected, or rather just one bank out of 76 expected. Starting at the top, the BLS reported that in February the US unexpectedly added 275K jobs, with just one research analyst (from Dai-Ichi Research) expecting a higher number.

Some context: after last month's record 4-sigma beat, today's print was "only" 3 sigma higher than estimates. Needless to say, two multiple sigma beats in a row used to only happen in the USSR... and now in the US, apparently.

Before we go any further, a quick note on what last month we said was "the most ridiculous jobs report in recent history": it appears the BLS read our comments and decided to stop beclowing itself. It did that by slashing last month's ridiculous print by over a third, and revising what was originally reported as a massive 353K beat to just 229K,  a 124K revision, which was the biggest one-month negative revision in two years!

Of course, that does not mean that this month's jobs print won't be revised lower: it will be, and not just that month but every other month until the November election because that's the only tool left in the Biden admin's box: pretend the economic and jobs are strong, then revise them sharply lower the next month, something we pointed out first last summer and which has not failed to disappoint once.

To be fair, not every aspect of the jobs report was stellar (after all, the BLS had to give it some vague credibility). Take the unemployment rate, after flatlining between 3.4% and 3.8% for two years - and thus denying expectations from Sahm's Rule that a recession may have already started - in February the unemployment rate unexpectedly jumped to 3.9%, the highest since February 2022 (with Black unemployment spiking by 0.3% to 5.6%, an indicator which the Biden admin will quickly slam as widespread economic racism or something).

And then there were average hourly earnings, which after surging 0.6% MoM in January (since revised to 0.5%) and spooking markets that wage growth is so hot, the Fed will have no choice but to delay cuts, in February the number tumbled to just 0.1%, the lowest in two years...

... for one simple reason: last month's average wage surge had nothing to do with actual wages, and everything to do with the BLS estimate of hours worked (which is the denominator in the average wage calculation) which last month tumbled to just 34.1 (we were led to believe) the lowest since the covid pandemic...

... but has since been revised higher while the February print rose even more, to 34.3, hence why the latest average wage data was once again a product not of wages going up, but of how long Americans worked in any weekly period, in this case higher from 34.1 to 34.3, an increase which has a major impact on the average calculation.

While the above data points were examples of some latent weakness in the latest report, perhaps meant to give it a sheen of veracity, it was everything else in the report that was a problem starting with the BLS's latest choice of seasonal adjustments (after last month's wholesale revision), which have gone from merely laughable to full clownshow, as the following comparison between the monthly change in BLS and ADP payrolls shows. The trend is clear: the Biden admin numbers are now clearly rising even as the impartial ADP (which directly logs employment numbers at the company level and is far more accurate), shows an accelerating slowdown.

But it's more than just the Biden admin hanging its "success" on seasonal adjustments: when one digs deeper inside the jobs report, all sorts of ugly things emerge... such as the growing unprecedented divergence between the Establishment (payrolls) survey and much more accurate Household (actual employment) survey. To wit, while in January the BLS claims 275K payrolls were added, the Household survey found that the number of actually employed workers dropped for the third straight month (and 4 in the past 5), this time by 184K (from 161.152K to 160.968K).

This means that while the Payrolls series hits new all time highs every month since December 2020 (when according to the BLS the US had its last month of payrolls losses), the level of Employment has not budged in the past year. Worse, as shown in the chart below, such a gaping divergence has opened between the two series in the past 4 years, that the number of Employed workers would need to soar by 9 million (!) to catch up to what Payrolls claims is the employment situation.

There's more: shifting from a quantitative to a qualitative assessment, reveals just how ugly the composition of "new jobs" has been. Consider this: the BLS reports that in February 2024, the US had 132.9 million full-time jobs and 27.9 million part-time jobs. Well, that's great... until you look back one year and find that in February 2023 the US had 133.2 million full-time jobs, or more than it does one year later! And yes, all the job growth since then has been in part-time jobs, which have increased by 921K since February 2023 (from 27.020 million to 27.941 million).

Here is a summary of the labor composition in the past year: all the new jobs have been part-time jobs!

But wait there's even more, because now that the primary season is over and we enter the heart of election season and political talking points will be thrown around left and right, especially in the context of the immigration crisis created intentionally by the Biden administration which is hoping to import millions of new Democratic voters (maybe the US can hold the presidential election in Honduras or Guatemala, after all it is their citizens that will be illegally casting the key votes in November), what we find is that in February, the number of native-born workers tumbled again, sliding by a massive 560K to just 129.807 million. Add to this the December data, and we get a near-record 2.4 million plunge in native-born workers in just the past 3 months (only the covid crash was worse)!

The offset? A record 1.2 million foreign-born (read immigrants, both legal and illegal but mostly illegal) workers added in February!

Said otherwise, not only has all job creation in the past 6 years has been exclusively for foreign-born workers...

Source: St Louis Fed FRED Native Born and Foreign Born

... but there has been zero job-creation for native born workers since June 2018!

This is a huge issue - especially at a time of an illegal alien flood at the southwest border...

... and is about to become a huge political scandal, because once the inevitable recession finally hits, there will be millions of furious unemployed Americans demanding a more accurate explanation for what happened - i.e., the illegal immigration floodgates that were opened by the Biden admin.

Which is also why Biden's handlers will do everything in their power to insure there is no official recession before November... and why after the election is over, all economic hell will finally break loose. Until then, however, expect the jobs numbers to get even more ridiculous.

Tyler Durden Fri, 03/08/2024 - 13:30

Read More

Continue Reading

Trending