Connect with us

Uncategorized

“Last night, my Uber driver was a loan officer.”

Nonbank mortgage lenders in September alone slashed some 8,200 jobs. The cutting is hitting bone now, with loan officers’ jobs increasingly on the chopping…

Published

on

The steady drumbeat of dour news in the mortgage industry punctuated by headlines announcing layoffs and closures among the ranks of independent mortgage banks continues to play out, with several lenders over the last two weeks adding to the torrent of pink slips.

Rising interest rates, sparked by Federal Reserve tightening policies, is the primary cause of the mortgage-finance industry’s pain right now. Last week, mortgage lender and servicer Mr. Cooper disclosed that it was laying off some 800 staff. 

Some 80% of the volume in our industry is done by about 40% of the LOs. And so, the bottom 20% of volume [handled by 60% of LOs] this is the part that has not yet shown up in [the layoff] data yet.

Garth Graham, senior partner at stratmor group

Similarly, news broke this week revealing that independent mortgage bank (IMB) New American Funding had culled its employee ranks by 240 — followed by news that non-QM lender Athas Capital Group was closing its doors and laying off more than 200 employees. In September alone, IMBs slashed some 8,200 jobs, a recent Inside Mortgage Finance analysis of U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics data shows.

Those job losses, however, are the tip of an iceberg that is expected to sink even more careers in the IMB ranks before the ice melts. Garth Graham, senior partner and manager of merger and acquisition activities for the Stratmor Group, said many of the layoffs in the IMB industry so far have involved employees working in support positions, with loan officer jobs being the last to be jettisoned.

“All this cutting didn’t really start until about March, and so we’re six months or so into this cycle,” Graham said. He added that there were roughly 440,000 to 450,000 people employed by IMBs “at the peak in our industry [last year], and there were only about 300,000 before the rates started running down during the COVID [pandemic].”

“So, there’s some 150,000 excess people,” Graham said. “In that 150,000, there are an awful lot of origination people, and the LOs are just beginning to be impacted.”

Charting the loan officer exit

Graham projects that layoffs overall will ultimately hit 40% to 50% of the IMB industry’s total mortgage-origination staff and about one-third of industry employment overall. IMBs are nondepository lending institutions that, according to the Urban Institute’s Housing Finance Policy Center, account for nearly 77% of all agency-eligible mortgage originations nationwide.

“The MBA just put out their last forecast, and everybody latches on to the $4.4 trillion [mortgage origination] market [in 2021] now forecast to drop to a $2 trillion market [next year],” Graham said. “I latched on to the 13 million first mortgages we did last year that are forecast next year to be 5.5 million. 

“From a staffing perspective, that seems much more dire than the $2 trillion headline.”

Jeff Walton, CEO of mortgage-data analytics company InGenius, during a recent interview offered this perspective on just how dire conditions are for some in the industry“Let me put it this way. Last night, my Uber driver was a loan officer.” 

Data provided by InGenius offers a deeper insight into the state of the industry for loan officers. According to InGenius, in 2021, the total loan-officer headcount nationwide was 353,119 — with 234,070 LOs having originated three or more loans. 

That’s up from 263,494 LOs in 2019, with 180,713 of that group having originated three or more loans for that year — representing an increase of nearly 30% between 2019 and 2021 (the refinancing boom) for the more active loan officers.

As of July 15 this year, however, some six months into the rising-rate cycle, InGenius’ data shows there were 276,837 licensed loan officers in the country. Of that total, 188,264 had originated three or more mortgage loans — representing a decline of 45,806 loan officers compared with 2021, or a nearly 20% drop over the period among the more active LOs.

That means today’s loan-officer workforce has already been pared down to levels approaching 2019 LO employment. Graham points out that most of that 20% drop in LO headcount as of July 15, compared with 2021, came after the first quarter of this year, however.

The largest 20% of lenders make up 80% of loan volume and employment. Therefore, unless there is substantial consolidation at the top, you should be able to gauge employment losses by monitoring layoffs across the largest 200 [IMB] companies, which is well under way.

Brett Ludden, managing director at sterling point advisors

Graham projects that by year’s end, that figure could go as high as a 40% to 45% overall reduction in LO headcount, compared with 2021.

“Some 80% of the volume in our industry is done by about 40% of the LOs,” Graham added. “And so, the bottom 20% of volume [handled by 60% of LOs] this is the part that has not yet shown up in [the layoff] data yet.

“There’s not a whole lot of volume at the bottom. The inverse of that, is that that top 40% of LOs doing 80% [of the volume] are worth a lot to good companies.”

Graham added that industrywide, IMB employment “is certainly getting back to the pre-COVID levels at 300,000 total jobs.”

“It’s painful for the 150,000 [or so people that are going to lose their jobs],” he said, “but it’s … not an existential meltdown like we had in 2008.”

Reading the employment tea leaves

Brett Ludden, managing director of mergers and acquisitions at Sterling Point Advisors, projects that the overall employment reduction among the nation’s 1,000 largest IMBs could go as high as 54% by mid-year 2023. Working from a larger total estimated employment base for the industry of 501,000 as of 2021 — a boom year — Ludden projects some 272,000 IMB jobs could be shed by mid-2023, resulting in a total industry headcount of 229,000. 

Ludden stresses that the projections are based on modeling estimates, adding that the best measure of employment losses in the IMB industry will be revealed by the lenders themselves. 

“The largest 20% of lenders make up 80% of loan volume and employment,” he added. “Therefore, unless there is substantial consolidation at the top, you should be able to gauge employment losses by monitoring layoffs across the largest 200 [IMB] companies, which is well under way.”

A recent report by Fitch Ratings states that the decline in mortgage originations in 2022 continues to exceed the rating agency’s expectations, leading to declining revenue for lenders from “lower origination volumes outpacing expense cuts.”

“Layoffs, channel exits and asset sales have accelerated, even with better capitalized players,” the Fitch report notes. “CitiJPMorgan and Wells Fargo are reducing staff and operations, while Santander exited the U.S. mortgage market in February and partnered with Rocket [Mortgage] to issue mortgages for its customers. 

“Smaller players such as real-estate tech startup Reali and Sprout Mortgage have shuttered, while First Guaranty Mortgage Corp. filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy. [In addition,] loanDepot exited the wholesale channel, with plans to sell its $1 billion pipeline and to refocus on consumer/retail channels.”

Optimistic and well-prepared companies are starting to see opportunities to pick up key staff and prepare for a refinance boom when rates eventually do fall.

Andrew Rhodes, Sr. Director and head of trading at mortgage capital trading

David Hrobon, a principal with the Stratmor Group, wrote in a recent commentary that by year’s end, the mortgage-advisory firm projects that some 50 IMB merger or acquisition transactions “will be announced or closed,” which is “50% more transactions than in 2018, the next highest year of lender consolidations in the past three decades.”

“Also, according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, our industry employed 427,000 employees in March of this year,” Hrobon added. “Given the [dour] loan-volume forecast … the number of companies and employees in the industry will no doubt look very different this time next year.”

Ludden projects that up to 30% of the 1,000 largest IMBs will disappear by the end of 2023 via sales, mergers or failures in the wake of the double whammy of still-rising inflation and interest rates.

“You have a number of entities who are originators of mortgages and are witnessing a significant drop in mortgage volumes and horrendous [loan] pricing,” wrote John Toohig, head of whole-loan trading at Raymond James, in his weekly online newsletter, “Let’s Talk Loans,” published on LinkedIn. “Originations skyrocketed on ultra-low rates, people hired quickly, mortgage bankers made a ton of money, several IPOs, the market got crowded, and then the Fed took away the punch bowl [by unleashing higher interest rates].”

How bad will it get?

Tom Piercy, managing director at Incenter Mortgage Advisors, said, in general, the outlook for the housing industry is “bad for the foreseeable future.”  

“However,” he added, “it could be very good for companies who are well-positioned on their balance sheet, meaning lower debt ratios and strong cash or liquid assets, and they have cost-efficient retail originations.” Piercy said those lenders will see opportunities expand.

‘“The mortgage market is going to consolidate, but that is coming off recent record profits and boom years [in 2020 and 2021],” said Andrew Rhodes, Sr., director and head of trading at Mortgage Capital Trading. “Optimistic and well-prepared companies are starting to see opportunities to pick up key staff and prepare for a refinance boom when rates eventually do fall.” 

When will that turn in rates begin? Stratmor’s Graham said, based on the Mortgage Bankers Association’s most recent forecast, we can expect “a recession and a drop in interest rates in the second half of next year.”

“The first time [the Federal Reserve] lowers rates, that’s the beginning of the change,” InGenius’ Walton added. He said there will likely be a lag time between any housing-industry rebound and a Fed move to start rolling back interest rates. 

“But, if rates go down precipitously, like they went up, then you’ll see the rebound much faster,” Walton added. Until then, he said the productive loan officers, “the ones that are part of the 40% doing 80% of the business,” they will stay in the trenches adding more referral leads and borrowers to their rosters.

“I was a loan officer when I started in the business,” Walton added, “and through the downturns, I just added more Realtors and builders or whatever, and I always came out better on the other side because I had staying power.”

Read More

Continue Reading

Uncategorized

Homes listed for sale in early June sell for $7,700 more

New Zillow research suggests the spring home shopping season may see a second wave this summer if mortgage rates fall
The post Homes listed for sale in…

Published

on

  • A Zillow analysis of 2023 home sales finds homes listed in the first two weeks of June sold for 2.3% more. 
  • The best time to list a home for sale is a month later than it was in 2019, likely driven by mortgage rates.
  • The best time to list can be as early as the second half of February in San Francisco, and as late as the first half of July in New York and Philadelphia. 

Spring home sellers looking to maximize their sale price may want to wait it out and list their home for sale in the first half of June. A new Zillow® analysis of 2023 sales found that homes listed in the first two weeks of June sold for 2.3% more, a $7,700 boost on a typical U.S. home.  

The best time to list consistently had been early May in the years leading up to the pandemic. The shift to June suggests mortgage rates are strongly influencing demand on top of the usual seasonality that brings buyers to the market in the spring. This home-shopping season is poised to follow a similar pattern as that in 2023, with the potential for a second wave if the Federal Reserve lowers interest rates midyear or later. 

The 2.3% sale price premium registered last June followed the first spring in more than 15 years with mortgage rates over 6% on a 30-year fixed-rate loan. The high rates put home buyers on the back foot, and as rates continued upward through May, they were still reassessing and less likely to bid boldly. In June, however, rates pulled back a little from 6.79% to 6.67%, which likely presented an opportunity for determined buyers heading into summer. More buyers understood their market position and could afford to transact, boosting competition and sale prices.

The old logic was that sellers could earn a premium by listing in late spring, when search activity hit its peak. Now, with persistently low inventory, mortgage rate fluctuations make their own seasonality. First-time home buyers who are on the edge of qualifying for a home loan may dip in and out of the market, depending on what’s happening with rates. It is almost certain the Federal Reserve will push back any interest-rate cuts to mid-2024 at the earliest. If mortgage rates follow, that could bring another surge of buyers later this year.

Mortgage rates have been impacting affordability and sale prices since they began rising rapidly two years ago. In 2022, sellers nationwide saw the highest sale premium when they listed their home in late March, right before rates barreled past 5% and continued climbing. 

Zillow’s research finds the best time to list can vary widely by metropolitan area. In 2023, it was as early as the second half of February in San Francisco, and as late as the first half of July in New York. Thirty of the top 35 largest metro areas saw for-sale listings command the highest sale prices between May and early July last year. 

Zillow also found a wide range in the sale price premiums associated with homes listed during those peak periods. At the hottest time of the year in San Jose, homes sold for 5.5% more, a $88,000 boost on a typical home. Meanwhile, homes in San Antonio sold for 1.9% more during that same time period.  

 

Metropolitan Area Best Time to List Price Premium Dollar Boost
United States First half of June 2.3% $7,700
New York, NY First half of July 2.4% $15,500
Los Angeles, CA First half of May 4.1% $39,300
Chicago, IL First half of June 2.8% $8,800
Dallas, TX First half of June 2.5% $9,200
Houston, TX Second half of April 2.0% $6,200
Washington, DC Second half of June 2.2% $12,700
Philadelphia, PA First half of July 2.4% $8,200
Miami, FL First half of June 2.3% $12,900
Atlanta, GA Second half of June 2.3% $8,700
Boston, MA Second half of May 3.5% $23,600
Phoenix, AZ First half of June 3.2% $14,700
San Francisco, CA Second half of February 4.2% $50,300
Riverside, CA First half of May 2.7% $15,600
Detroit, MI First half of July 3.3% $7,900
Seattle, WA First half of June 4.3% $31,500
Minneapolis, MN Second half of May 3.7% $13,400
San Diego, CA Second half of April 3.1% $29,600
Tampa, FL Second half of June 2.1% $8,000
Denver, CO Second half of May 2.9% $16,900
Baltimore, MD First half of July 2.2% $8,200
St. Louis, MO First half of June 2.9% $7,000
Orlando, FL First half of June 2.2% $8,700
Charlotte, NC Second half of May 3.0% $11,000
San Antonio, TX First half of June 1.9% $5,400
Portland, OR Second half of April 2.6% $14,300
Sacramento, CA First half of June 3.2% $17,900
Pittsburgh, PA Second half of June 2.3% $4,700
Cincinnati, OH Second half of April 2.7% $7,500
Austin, TX Second half of May 2.8% $12,600
Las Vegas, NV First half of June 3.4% $14,600
Kansas City, MO Second half of May 2.5% $7,300
Columbus, OH Second half of June 3.3% $10,400
Indianapolis, IN First half of July 3.0% $8,100
Cleveland, OH First half of July  3.4% $7,400
San Jose, CA First half of June 5.5% $88,400

 

The post Homes listed for sale in early June sell for $7,700 more appeared first on Zillow Research.

Read More

Continue Reading

Uncategorized

February Employment Situation

By Paul Gomme and Peter Rupert The establishment data from the BLS showed a 275,000 increase in payroll employment for February, outpacing the 230,000…

Published

on

By Paul Gomme and Peter Rupert

The establishment data from the BLS showed a 275,000 increase in payroll employment for February, outpacing the 230,000 average over the previous 12 months. The payroll data for January and December were revised down by a total of 167,000. The private sector added 223,000 new jobs, the largest gain since May of last year.

Temporary help services employment continues a steep decline after a sharp post-pandemic rise.

Average hours of work increased from 34.2 to 34.3. The increase, along with the 223,000 private employment increase led to a hefty increase in total hours of 5.6% at an annualized rate, also the largest increase since May of last year.

The establishment report, once again, beat “expectations;” the WSJ survey of economists was 198,000. Other than the downward revisions, mentioned above, another bit of negative news was a smallish increase in wage growth, from $34.52 to $34.57.

The household survey shows that the labor force increased 150,000, a drop in employment of 184,000 and an increase in the number of unemployed persons of 334,000. The labor force participation rate held steady at 62.5, the employment to population ratio decreased from 60.2 to 60.1 and the unemployment rate increased from 3.66 to 3.86. Remember that the unemployment rate is the number of unemployed relative to the labor force (the number employed plus the number unemployed). Consequently, the unemployment rate can go up if the number of unemployed rises holding fixed the labor force, or if the labor force shrinks holding the number unemployed unchanged. An increase in the unemployment rate is not necessarily a bad thing: it may reflect a strong labor market drawing “marginally attached” individuals from outside the labor force. Indeed, there was a 96,000 decline in those workers.

Earlier in the week, the BLS announced JOLTS (Job Openings and Labor Turnover Survey) data for January. There isn’t much to report here as the job openings changed little at 8.9 million, the number of hires and total separations were little changed at 5.7 million and 5.3 million, respectively.

As has been the case for the last couple of years, the number of job openings remains higher than the number of unemployed persons.

Also earlier in the week the BLS announced that productivity increased 3.2% in the 4th quarter with output rising 3.5% and hours of work rising 0.3%.

The bottom line is that the labor market continues its surprisingly (to some) strong performance, once again proving stronger than many had expected. This strength makes it difficult to justify any interest rate cuts soon, particularly given the recent inflation spike.

Read More

Continue Reading

Uncategorized

Mortgage rates fall as labor market normalizes

Jobless claims show an expanding economy. We will only be in a recession once jobless claims exceed 323,000 on a four-week moving average.

Published

on

Everyone was waiting to see if this week’s jobs report would send mortgage rates higher, which is what happened last month. Instead, the 10-year yield had a muted response after the headline number beat estimates, but we have negative job revisions from previous months. The Federal Reserve’s fear of wage growth spiraling out of control hasn’t materialized for over two years now and the unemployment rate ticked up to 3.9%. For now, we can say the labor market isn’t tight anymore, but it’s also not breaking.

The key labor data line in this expansion is the weekly jobless claims report. Jobless claims show an expanding economy that has not lost jobs yet. We will only be in a recession once jobless claims exceed 323,000 on a four-week moving average.

From the Fed: In the week ended March 2, initial claims for unemployment insurance benefits were flat, at 217,000. The four-week moving average declined slightly by 750, to 212,250


Below is an explanation of how we got here with the labor market, which all started during COVID-19.

1. I wrote the COVID-19 recovery model on April 7, 2020, and retired it on Dec. 9, 2020. By that time, the upfront recovery phase was done, and I needed to model out when we would get the jobs lost back.

2. Early in the labor market recovery, when we saw weaker job reports, I doubled and tripled down on my assertion that job openings would get to 10 million in this recovery. Job openings rose as high as to 12 million and are currently over 9 million. Even with the massive miss on a job report in May 2021, I didn’t waver.

Currently, the jobs openings, quit percentage and hires data are below pre-COVID-19 levels, which means the labor market isn’t as tight as it once was, and this is why the employment cost index has been slowing data to move along the quits percentage.  

2-US_Job_Quits_Rate-1-2

3. I wrote that we should get back all the jobs lost to COVID-19 by September of 2022. At the time this would be a speedy labor market recovery, and it happened on schedule, too

Total employment data

4. This is the key one for right now: If COVID-19 hadn’t happened, we would have between 157 million and 159 million jobs today, which would have been in line with the job growth rate in February 2020. Today, we are at 157,808,000. This is important because job growth should be cooling down now. We are more in line with where the labor market should be when averaging 140K-165K monthly. So for now, the fact that we aren’t trending between 140K-165K means we still have a bit more recovery kick left before we get down to those levels. 




From BLS: Total nonfarm payroll employment rose by 275,000 in February, and the unemployment rate increased to 3.9 percent, the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics reported today. Job gains occurred in health care, in government, in food services and drinking places, in social assistance, and in transportation and warehousing.

Here are the jobs that were created and lost in the previous month:

IMG_5092

In this jobs report, the unemployment rate for education levels looks like this:

  • Less than a high school diploma: 6.1%
  • High school graduate and no college: 4.2%
  • Some college or associate degree: 3.1%
  • Bachelor’s degree or higher: 2.2%
IMG_5093_320f22

Today’s report has continued the trend of the labor data beating my expectations, only because I am looking for the jobs data to slow down to a level of 140K-165K, which hasn’t happened yet. I wouldn’t categorize the labor market as being tight anymore because of the quits ratio and the hires data in the job openings report. This also shows itself in the employment cost index as well. These are key data lines for the Fed and the reason we are going to see three rate cuts this year.

Read More

Continue Reading

Trending