Connect with us

Hype is over: How NFTs and art will benefit from each other moving forward

Leaving the hype behind, NFTs coupled with the art market can significantly improve and even transform the art industry in many ways.
Due to the past nonfungible token (NFT) boom, the crypto and art communities have been collaborating.

Published

on

Leaving the hype behind, NFTs coupled with the art market can significantly improve and even transform the art industry in many ways.

Due to the past nonfungible token (NFT) boom, the crypto and art communities have been collaborating closely — maybe for the first time in history. In both industries, there is a lot of skepticism and misunderstanding. As we make our way out of the NFT bubble, what is expected to come next? This deep dive describes a long-term vision of the NFT and art market development that could appeal to both worlds. 

Stereotypically, crypto people discuss deals on Twitter and Discord, communicate through memes or abbreviations and challenge old school models with agonistic antipathy (Okay, Boomers!). In contrast, the so-called “art people” are at times conservative, stick to their roots and history, meet for a late lunch at Ladurée and discuss deals in an Art Basel VIP lounge during private presales. Those communities' respective cultures are on the opposite side of the spectrum. That is the reason why some of the narratives about blockchain-enabled art (you can call it NFTs) are simply wrong.

Related: NFT art galleries: Future of digital artwork or another crypto fad?

The “eliminate intermediaries” paradigm doesn’t work for art

Crypto narratives have always underlined the aim to eliminate all the intermediaries, building a more transparent, straightforward and optimized communication between buyers and sellers. In the art industry, however, those intermediaries play a significant role — exploring the space, revealing the artists and further building their profile and value.

It's an inevitable and vital part of the art world, which has proven itself in crypto when big traditional auction houses, like Christie’s and Sotheby’s, gave the power of their brand names to blow up crypto art sales. Even though the $69 million sale between Beeple and the collector, “MetaKovan,” reminds us of the ICO pump-and-dump schemes, it’s undeniable that the involvement of the respectable auction house established precedence. This sale will remain a turning point for the blockchain-enabled art market, as it has captured the attention of traditional artists and gallerists — all now willing to get into the space. Sotheby’s quickly followed its rival and entered the NFT game.

Intermediaries in art do creative work that cannot be automated and replaced by a smart contract. Reputable art connoisseurs, dealers and gallery owners bring forth deep knowledge and establish taste and value in art. Their curation, indeed, is something that the chaotic crypto art world currently lacks. Those are intermediaries that NFT art should not aim to eliminate.

Related: Art reimagined: NFTs are changing the collectibles market

“NFTs are a collective delusion based on air” — Leaders in the art industry who overlook the main idea

The art industry's goal was always to adopt a thoughtful approach, to offer deep knowledge and profound criticism to reveal excellence in visual experience, idea or feeling when interacting with an art piece. When analyzing crypto art, critics focus on the meaning of the piece and react to the superficial and sometimes vulgar nature of crypto artworks. Therefore, they miss the blockchain technology value proposition, which has already proven itself in many other industries. They overlook the main idea and misjudge some of the crypto art projects that are fundamental for the community. (Let’s face it: Some of us also once thought that CryptoPunks were overpriced before jumping down the rabbit hole.)

Education and mutual respect will lead to new relationships and use cases. Below, I’ll provide an overview of the trends that are already starting to form and show how NFTs can transform the art industry.

Modern multimedia and generative art

In the 19th century, the printmaking industry developed when artists started using the latest technology of printing editions on metal plates to monetize their work. Since the development of photography, video and digital art formats, the use of technology has continued accelerating. Conversations between art and technology have always existed, and NFTs are just another proof of the ongoing trend.

Blockchain technology provides a medium for the artists, giving them a new creative landscape — specifically, through direct communication with their audience. Generative art is another example: Projects like Eulerbeats and ArtBlocks give a whole new format to modern multimedia art.

Museum in the metaverse

Should new, digital art hang on the walls of museums? What is a suitable representation for it? Perhaps, the virtual worlds and metaverses are just the right place to represent multimedia art. Digital museums are developing — accessible by anyone, from anywhere and presenting digital art in its original form.

Some critics debate that digital art doesn’t provide the feeling of an object, but how many times a day do they smile at an emoji received in their messages? NFTs provide a way of forming a verifiable relationship — a unique experience for both the artist and collector. Virtual experiences are different from real-world ones but are still unarguably powerful.

Related: Digital turns physical: Top NFT galleries to visit in-person in 2021

NFTs for provenance

After the creation of an art piece, it then goes through the levels of validation. Who talks about it? Who collects it? Where is it exhibited? Provenance is a crucial aspect of the art industry; it is complex storytelling that defines the value of the art piece.

Blockchain allows for the tracking of this history in a reliable way through the implementation of authenticity and ownership certificates — smart contracts created when NFTs are issued, sold or resold. This became possible thanks to the basic quality of the blockchain network — the immutability of the transaction.

Art industry consensus

Going one step further, the crypto ecosystem developed new community models that allow players to interact online and collectively validate decisions and ideas. This is called a “consensus.” All of the blockchain technology has been built on it, and communities have adopted this logic and system of rules to structure themselves. These models find their expression in governance tokens and in decentralized autonomous organizations, or DAOs, which allow validators to get rewards for the significant input recognized by other community members.

As soon as the art community gets the DAO knowledge, the power of trend-making will go back to curators providing value to the art system by sharing their experience and vision.

“Phygital” art: Bridging the gap

Crypto gave birth to a new financial system that is now being adopted by leading financial institutions. There is a simple reason for that: It just works more efficiently. Traditional financial systems will start adopting NFT-based assets into their portfolio management as well. That will urge governments to issue regulations, which will clarify how to register and use NFT assets. The legal framework will create the link between physical art and digital NFTs, creating a “phygital” asset.

Phygital art closes the gap between physical and digital art, merging the best of both worlds together and enabling new models of ownership and funding in the art world.

Related: Hybrid smart contracts will replace the legal system

Ownership reimagined and democratized

The immediate advantages that asset holders will gain from the blockchain ecosystem are the transparency and ability to track their investments on the blockchain and move them around quickly. However, another impressive decentralized finance (DeFi) development is the fractionalization of NFTs, which can democratize art investments and revolutionize private museums’ and galleries' financial models.

Some modern art museums can not afford to hold permanent collections, while other traditional galleries are forced to sell art to sustain themselves. In emerging countries where art is sold in galleries, pieces are frequently taken out of the country despite heritage protection laws. Distributed ownership allows museums to attract funding globally, giving more retail investors access to this asset class. Leaving ownership of one fraction to themselves, museums will be able to preserve the item while getting some funding from the sale.

Some art pieces are just too expensive, even for an institution to acquire, and distributed ownership can ease this type of sale.

Alternative grants model for museums and artists

Art is a capital-hungry industry, which has significantly suffered during the COVID-19 pandemic. It requires support from governments and big institutions — yet this support is not always provided in certain countries, forming unequal conditions for art industry players. However, NFTs have shown the ability to redirect capital based on community values and highlight new charity opportunities. Vitalik Buterin underlined the charity aspect of NFTs when he recently made a large, personal donation to an Indian COVID-19 relief fund (perhaps the biggest in history). While the institutions are late to invest due to their structural complexity, NFTs give the community an opportunity to self-fund.

While on the surface the crypto community is driven by financial incentives (like all of us), the core of the community lives in a paradigm of new ethics where people are willing to invest in sustainability and culture. The foundations and charity programs supporting art and artists will emerge because it is simply a natural move for the crypto industry to support community-driven initiatives. The art world will become increasingly global and effective using the crypto industry’s knowledge and investment. Art market players will get some freedom to invest fast in capital-heavy directions that they consider important, with the support of crypto investors.

Museum NFT e-commerce

An exciting example of attracting additional revenue for museums is a recent NFT sold by Uffizi Gallery. The gallery created a digital copy of Michelangelo’s “Doni Tondo” in a one-of-one edition signed by museum director Eike Schmidt for $170,000, and plans to release other prints from the collection.

Looking at the current trend of how brands see NFTs as a tool, we can predict the emergence of some kind of museum e-commerce industry in the future. Rare, digital collectible items produced by a museum in limited editions as NFTs could be traded or redeemed for an actual physical print as well.

Working together on the art industry of the future

The merging of the art and blockchain communities is a win-win. Art curators, museums and creators will do what they do best: bring beauty into the blockchain world, enrich content and narrative and bring high-quality art into the space.

Blockchain communities are looking at NFT art beyond the hype to be able to bring effectiveness, transparency and new models of ownership, funding, and grants. Therefore, individuals who will actively focus on leveraging the benefits of both ecosystems instead of criticizing each other for differences — will shape the future of the NFT and art industries.

This article does not contain investment advice or recommendations. Every investment and trading move involves risk, and readers should conduct their own research when making a decision.

The views, thoughts and opinions expressed here are the author’s alone and do not necessarily reflect or represent the views and opinions of Cointelegraph.

Sophia Schteiner holds a journalism degree from Lomonosov Moscow State University and started her career as an art critic covering the film industry and urban architecture. She founded her agency, Schteiner PR, focusing on luxury brands in art, French craftsmanship, design and interiors. In 2018, she joined an international communications agency, working with blockchain startups during the crypto bull market.

Read More

Continue Reading

International

Chronic stress and inflammation linked to societal and environmental impacts in new study

From anxiety about the state of the world to ongoing waves of Covid-19, the stresses we face can seem relentless and even overwhelming. Worse, these stressors…

Published

on

From anxiety about the state of the world to ongoing waves of Covid-19, the stresses we face can seem relentless and even overwhelming. Worse, these stressors can cause chronic inflammation in our bodies. Chronic inflammation is linked to serious conditions such as cardiovascular disease and cancer – and may also affect our thinking and behavior.   

Credit: Image: Vodovotz et al/Frontiers

From anxiety about the state of the world to ongoing waves of Covid-19, the stresses we face can seem relentless and even overwhelming. Worse, these stressors can cause chronic inflammation in our bodies. Chronic inflammation is linked to serious conditions such as cardiovascular disease and cancer – and may also affect our thinking and behavior.   

A new hypothesis published in Frontiers in Science suggests the negative impacts may extend far further.   

“We propose that stress, inflammation, and consequently impaired cognition in individuals can scale up to communities and populations,” explained lead author Prof Yoram Vodovotz of the University of Pittsburgh, USA.

“This could affect the decision-making and behavior of entire societies, impair our cognitive ability to address complex issues like climate change, social unrest, and infectious disease – and ultimately lead to a self-sustaining cycle of societal dysfunction and environmental degradation,” he added.

Bodily inflammation ‘mapped’ in the brain  

One central premise to the hypothesis is an association between chronic inflammation and cognitive dysfunction.  

“The cause of this well-known phenomenon is not currently known,” said Vodovotz. “We propose a mechanism, which we call the ‘central inflammation map’.”    

The authors’ novel idea is that the brain creates its own copy of bodily inflammation. Normally, this inflammation map allows the brain to manage the inflammatory response and promote healing.   

When inflammation is high or chronic, however, the response goes awry and can damage healthy tissues and organs. The authors suggest the inflammation map could similarly harm the brain and impair cognition, emotion, and behavior.   

Accelerated spread of stress and inflammation online   

A second premise is the spread of chronic inflammation from individuals to populations.  

“While inflammation is not contagious per se, it could still spread via the transmission of stress among people,” explained Vodovotz.   

The authors further suggest that stress is being transmitted faster than ever before, through social media and other digital communications.  

“People are constantly bombarded with high levels of distressing information, be it the news, negative online comments, or a feeling of inadequacy when viewing social media feeds,” said Vodovotz. “We hypothesize that this new dimension of human experience, from which it is difficult to escape, is driving stress, chronic inflammation, and cognitive impairment across global societies.”   

Inflammation as a driver of social and planetary disruption  

These ideas shift our view of inflammation as a biological process restricted to an individual. Instead, the authors see it as a multiscale process linking molecular, cellular, and physiological interactions in each of us to altered decision-making and behavior in populations – and ultimately to large-scale societal and environmental impacts.  

“Stress-impaired judgment could explain the chaotic and counter-intuitive responses of large parts of the global population to stressful events such as climate change and the Covid-19 pandemic,” explained Vodovotz.  

“An inability to address these and other stressors may propagate a self-fulfilling sense of pervasive danger, causing further stress, inflammation, and impaired cognition in a runaway, positive feedback loop,” he added.  

The fact that current levels of global stress have not led to widespread societal disorder could indicate an equally strong stabilizing effect from “controllers” such as trust in laws, science, and multinational organizations like the United Nations.   

“However, societal norms and institutions are increasingly being questioned, at times rightly so as relics of a foregone era,” said Prof Paul Verschure of Radboud University, the Netherlands, and a co-author of the article. “The challenge today is how we can ward off a new adversarial era of instability due to global stress caused by a multi-scale combination of geopolitical fragmentation, conflicts, and ecological collapse amplified by existential angst, cognitive overload, and runaway disinformation.”    

Reducing social media exposure as part of the solution  

The authors developed a mathematical model to test their ideas and explore ways to reduce stress and build resilience.  

“Preliminary results highlight the need for interventions at multiple levels and scales,” commented co-author Prof Julia Arciero of Indiana University, USA.  

“While anti-inflammatory drugs are sometimes used to treat medical conditions associated with inflammation, we do not believe these are the whole answer for individuals,” said Dr David Katz, co-author and a specialist in preventive and lifestyle medicine based in the US. “Lifestyle changes such as healthy nutrition, exercise, and reducing exposure to stressful online content could also be important.”  

“The dawning new era of precision and personalized therapeutics could also offer enormous potential,” he added.  

At the societal level, the authors suggest creating calm public spaces and providing education on the norms and institutions that keep our societies stable and functioning.  

“While our ‘inflammation map’ hypothesis and corresponding mathematical model are a start, a coordinated and interdisciplinary research effort is needed to define interventions that would improve the lives of individuals and the resilience of communities to stress. We hope our article stimulates scientists around the world to take up this challenge,” Vodovotz concluded.  

The article is part of the Frontiers in Science multimedia article hub ‘A multiscale map of inflammatory stress’. The hub features a video, an explainer, a version of the article written for kids, and an editorial, viewpoints, and policy outlook from other eminent experts: Prof David Almeida (Penn State University, USA), Prof Pietro Ghezzi (University of Urbino Carlo Bo, Italy), and Dr Ioannis P Androulakis (Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, USA). 


Read More

Continue Reading

International

Acadia’s Nuplazid fails PhIII study due to higher-than-expected placebo effect

After years of trying to expand the market territory for Nuplazid, Acadia Pharmaceuticals might have hit a dead end, with a Phase III fail in schizophrenia…

Published

on

After years of trying to expand the market territory for Nuplazid, Acadia Pharmaceuticals might have hit a dead end, with a Phase III fail in schizophrenia due to the placebo arm performing better than expected.

Steve Davis

“We will continue to analyze these data with our scientific advisors, but we do not intend to conduct any further clinical trials with pimavanserin,” CEO Steve Davis said in a Monday press release. Acadia’s stock $ACAD dropped by 17.41% before the market opened Tuesday.

Pimavanserin, a serotonin inverse agonist and also a 5-HT2A receptor antagonist, is already in the market with the brand name Nuplazid for Parkinson’s disease psychosis. Efforts to expand into other indications such as Alzheimer’s-related psychosis and major depression have been unsuccessful, and previous trials in schizophrenia have yielded mixed data at best. Its February presentation does not list other pimavanserin studies in progress.

The Phase III ADVANCE-2 trial investigated 34 mg pimavanserin versus placebo in 454 patients who have negative symptoms of schizophrenia. The study used the negative symptom assessment-16 (NSA-16) total score as a primary endpoint and followed participants up to week 26. Study participants have control of positive symptoms due to antipsychotic therapies.

The company said that the change from baseline in this measure for the treatment arm was similar between the Phase II ADVANCE-1 study and ADVANCE-2 at -11.6 and -11.8, respectively. However, the placebo was higher in ADVANCE-2 at -11.1, when this was -8.5 in ADVANCE-1. The p-value in ADVANCE-2 was 0.4825.

In July last year, another Phase III schizophrenia trial — by Sumitomo and Otsuka — also reported negative results due to what the company noted as Covid-19 induced placebo effect.

According to Mizuho Securities analysts, ADVANCE-2 data were disappointing considering the company applied what it learned from ADVANCE-1, such as recruiting patients outside the US to alleviate a high placebo effect. The Phase III recruited participants in Argentina and Europe.

Analysts at Cowen added that the placebo effect has been a “notorious headwind” in US-based trials, which appears to “now extend” to ex-US studies. But they also noted ADVANCE-1 reported a “modest effect” from the drug anyway.

Nonetheless, pimavanserin’s safety profile in the late-stage study “was consistent with previous clinical trials,” with the drug having an adverse event rate of 30.4% versus 40.3% with placebo, the company said. Back in 2018, even with the FDA approval for Parkinson’s psychosis, there was an intense spotlight on Nuplazid’s safety profile.

Acadia previously aimed to get Nuplazid approved for Alzheimer’s-related psychosis but had many hurdles. The drug faced an adcomm in June 2022 that voted 9-3 noting that the drug is unlikely to be effective in this setting, culminating in a CRL a few months later.

As for the company’s next R&D milestones, Mizuho analysts said it won’t be anytime soon: There is the Phase III study for ACP-101 in Prader-Willi syndrome with data expected late next year and a Phase II trial for ACP-204 in Alzheimer’s disease psychosis with results anticipated in 2026.

Acadia collected $549.2 million in full-year 2023 revenues for Nuplazid, with $143.9 million in the fourth quarter.

Read More

Continue Reading

Uncategorized

Digital Currency And Gold As Speculative Warnings

Over the last few years, digital currencies and gold have become decent barometers of speculative investor appetite. Such isn’t surprising given the evolution…

Published

on

Over the last few years, digital currencies and gold have become decent barometers of speculative investor appetite. Such isn’t surprising given the evolution of the market into a “casino” following the pandemic, where retail traders have increased their speculative appetites.

“Such is unsurprising, given that retail investors often fall victim to the psychological behavior of the “fear of missing out.” The chart below shows the “dumb money index” versus the S&P 500. Once again, retail investors are very long equities relative to the institutional players ascribed to being the “smart money.””

“The difference between “smart” and “dumb money” investors shows that, more often than not, the “dumb money” invests near market tops and sells near market bottoms.”

Net Smart Dumb Money vs Market

That enthusiasm has increased sharply since last November as stocks surged in hopes that the Federal Reserve would cut interest rates. As noted by Sentiment Trader:

“Over the past 18 weeks, the straight-up rally has moved us to an interesting juncture in the Sentiment Cycle. For the past few weeks, the S&P 500 has demonstrated a high positive correlation to the ‘Enthusiasm’ part of the cycle and a highly negative correlation to the ‘Panic’ phase.”

Investor Enthusiasm

That frenzy to chase the markets, driven by the psychological bias of the “fear of missing out,” has permeated the entirety of the market. As noted in This Is Nuts:”

“Since then, the entire market has surged higher following last week’s earnings report from Nvidia (NVDA). The reason I say “this is nuts” is the assumption that all companies were going to grow earnings and revenue at Nvidia’s rate. There is little doubt about Nvidia’s earnings and revenue growth rates. However, to maintain that growth pace indefinitely, particularly at 32x price-to-sales, means others like AMD and Intel must lose market share.”

Nvidia Price To Sales

Of course, it is not just a speculative frenzy in the markets for stocks, specifically anything related to “artificial intelligence,” but that exuberance has spilled over into gold and cryptocurrencies.

Birds Of A Feather

There are a couple of ways to measure exuberance in the assets. While sentiment measures examine the broad market, technical indicators can reflect exuberance on individual asset levels. However, before we get to our charts, we need a brief explanation of statistics, specifically, standard deviation.

As I discussed in “Revisiting Bob Farrell’s 10 Investing Rules”:

“Like a rubber band that has been stretched too far – it must be relaxed in order to be stretched again. This is exactly the same for stock prices that are anchored to their moving averages. Trends that get overextended in one direction, or another, always return to their long-term average. Even during a strong uptrend or strong downtrend, prices often move back (revert) to a long-term moving average.”

The idea of “stretching the rubber band” can be measured in several ways, but I will limit our discussion this week to Standard Deviation and measuring deviation with “Bollinger Bands.”

“Standard Deviation” is defined as:

“A measure of the dispersion of a set of data from its mean. The more spread apart the data, the higher the deviation. Standard deviation is calculated as the square root of the variance.”

In plain English, this means that the further away from the average that an event occurs, the more unlikely it becomes. As shown below, out of 1000 occurrences, only three will fall outside the area of 3 standard deviations. 95.4% of the time, events will occur within two standard deviations.

Standard Deviation Chart

A second measure of “exuberance” is “relative strength.”

“In technical analysis, the relative strength index (RSI) is a momentum indicator that measures the magnitude of recent price changes to evaluate overbought or oversold conditions in the price of a stock or other asset. The RSI is displayed as an oscillator (a line graph that moves between two extremes) and can read from 0 to 100.

Traditional interpretation and usage of the RSI are that values of 70 or above indicate that a security is becoming overbought or overvalued and may be primed for a trend reversal or corrective pullback in price. An RSI reading of 30 or below indicates an oversold or undervalued condition.” – Investopedia

With those two measures, let’s look at Nvidia (NVDA), the poster child of speculative momentum trading in the markets. Nvidia trades more than 3 standard deviations above its moving average, and its RSI is 81. The last time this occurred was in July of 2023 when Nvidia consolidated and corrected prices through November.

NVDA chart vs Bollinger Bands

Interestingly, gold also trades well into 3 standard deviation territory with an RSI reading of 75. Given that gold is supposed to be a “safe haven” or “risk off” asset, it is instead getting swept up in the current market exuberance.

Gold vs Bollinger Bands

The same is seen with digital currencies. Given the recent approval of spot, Bitcoin exchange-traded funds (ETFs), the panic bid to buy Bitcoin has pushed the price well into 3 standard deviation territory with an RSI of 73.

Bitcoin vs Bollinger Bands

In other words, the stock market frenzy to “buy anything that is going up” has spread from just a handful of stocks related to artificial intelligence to gold and digital currencies.

It’s All Relative

We can see the correlation between stock market exuberance and gold and digital currency, which has risen since 2015 but accelerated following the post-pandemic, stimulus-fueled market frenzy. Since the market, gold and cryptocurrencies, or Bitcoin for our purposes, have disparate prices, we have rebased the performance to 100 in 2015.

Gold was supposed to be an inflation hedge. Yet, in 2022, gold prices fell as the market declined and inflation surged to 9%. However, as inflation has fallen and the stock market surged, so has gold. Notably, since 2015, gold and the market have moved in a more correlated pattern, which has reduced the hedging effect of gold in portfolios. In other words, during the subsequent market decline, gold will likely track stocks lower, failing to provide its “wealth preservation” status for investors.

SP500 vs Gold

The same goes for cryptocurrencies. Bitcoin is substantially more volatile than gold and tends to ebb and flow with the overall market. As sentiment surges in the S&P 500, Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies follow suit as speculative appetites increase. Unfortunately, for individuals once again piling into Bitcoin to chase rising prices, if, or when, the market corrects, the decline in cryptocurrencies will likely substantially outpace the decline in market-based equities. This is particularly the case as Wall Street can now short the spot-Bitcoin ETFs, creating additional selling pressure on Bitcoin.

SP500 vs Bitcoin

Just for added measure, here is Bitcoin versus gold.

Gold vs Bitcoin

Not A Recommendation

There are many narratives surrounding the markets, digital currency, and gold. However, in today’s market, more than in previous years, all assets are getting swept up into the investor-feeding frenzy.

Sure, this time could be different. I am only making an observation and not an investment recommendation.

However, from a portfolio management perspective, it will likely pay to remain attentive to the correlated risk between asset classes. If some event causes a reversal in bullish exuberance, cash and bonds may be the only place to hide.

The post Digital Currency And Gold As Speculative Warnings appeared first on RIA.

Read More

Continue Reading

Trending