Connect with us

Uncategorized

Housing Market Tracker: A notable drop in inventory

The housing market saw inventory fall 4% last week and is on the cusp of breaking under 1 million total active listings.

Published

on

The housing market saw inventory fall 4% last week from the week before. That’s a big one-week change. Does that mean we are heading back to all-time lows in inventory again for 2023?

Traditionally, we do see housing inventory fall in the month of December, however, we clearly saw in the second half of 2022 that higher rates created more days on the market and inventory was lingering longer. During the last four weeks and especially this past week, we are seeing inventory decline faster than expected. 

So, is this the traditional seasonal decline we see during every December/January, or have falling mortgage rates (since mid November) contributed to this? The purchase application data will help us find the answer. Purchase application data corresponds to future demand, meaning that even when the number of applications is growing, we won’t see it in sales data until 30-90 days out. This is why we need to track it on a weekly basis.

Purchase application data

Usually, I wouldn’t put much weight in data for the last week and the first week of the year because it’s seasonally the slowest period. However, even with a seasonal decline in volume and the fact that many people don’t apply for a mortgage during the holidays, there is something to be seen here because the data line snapped a seven-week positive trend as mortgage rates rose toward the end of the year. 

Before these two weeks, purchase applications had seven weeks of positive data, tracking with the drop in mortgage rates from 7.37% in November to 6.12%. Then rates rose toward the end of the year to back over 6.5%: that rise in rates could have facilitated the weaker purchase application data in the past two weeks. 

Since purchase applications deviated from the trend and changed with higher rates, we have to pay attention to that. Now that mortgage rates have fallen again, the next few weeks will provide more clarity.

Purchase application data is very seasonal in a standard setting: it typically rises after the second week of January through the first week of May. Traditionally after May, total volume always falls. However, the year-over-year data is still critical to keep track of for the housing market.

We have to show discipline here; this data line had a historic waterfall dive, wiping out seven years of gains in one year (see chart below). The bar is so low that we can all trip over it, so the weekly data focus will be critical.

Weekly housing inventory

As noted above, the last few weeks have seen a noticeable 4% decline in inventory. Most of that decline can be attributed to the yearly seasonal decrease. If purchase application data started to improve toward the end of the year, and it looks out 30-90 days, then some of the inventory clearing can be attributed to better demand, not just the seasonal decline in inventory.

  • Weekly inventory change: (Dec. 30, 2022-Jan. 6, 2023): Fell from 490,809 to 471,349 
  • Same week last year: (Dec. 31, 2021-Jan. 7, 2022): Fell from 293,477 to 292,021

Altos Research gives us a fresh look at weekly data before the traditional outlets give us that data line. As we can see in the chart below, the weekly inventory data is now heading down more noticeably. We want to see whether this weekly data stops declining before the spring seasonal push in inventory or if we will have a repeat of the second half of 2022, where we saw a lack of new listing growth. That mean homebuyers would have slim pickings again for the spring buying season.

What we don’t want to happen this year is a decline in new listing data on a yearly basis. We saw that after June 2022, and that showed me that the housing market wasn’t functioning normally.

We are on the cusp of breaking under 1 million total active listings, and if this happens in 2023, it will be only the second time in recent history this has occurred. 

Per the last existing home sales report, we have 1.14 million homes for sale. Historically, the U.S. has between 2 million and 2.5 million. During the height of the housing bubble years, we had 4 million.


10-year yield and mortgage rates

The big story of last week was that after the solid jobs report, the 10-year yield fell lower, sending mortgage rates down to 6.20%. The bond market likes to see wage growth cooling down because if headline inflation is falling and wage growth is falling, the bond market is looking for the end of the rate-hike cycle. 

Since the November CPI report, it’s been hard for the 10-year yield to break above 4.25%, and the bond market has decided that the peak growth rate of inflation has already happened, even with the labor market still tight.



I think the bond market is getting ahead of the Fed with the inflation story. We still have a tight labor market and mortgage rates are already falling. Now imagine if the labor market data get weaker, which is part of the Fed’s forecast. It’s hard to conceive now that mortgage rates would get up toward 8%.

This is a critical discussion for housing because the housing market is impacted disproportionately when rates fall during recessionary data. After all, most homeowners, buyers, and sellers who will buy homes are still employed during any traditional recession and can leverage lower rates to help affordability.

The week ahead

What we want to do with this weekly Housing Market Tracker is see the most current update to demand when rates rise or fall with purchase application data.

This week, we have some crucial data lines; they will come out on Thursday morning with the Consumer Price Inflation data and jobless claims. Inflation levels are still historically high, however the growth rate of inflation should slow down over the year. 

The chart below tracks the Consumer Price Index and as we can see, it peaked in 2022 and it’s slowly moving lower now. The Federal Reserve has cautioned everyone not to read too much into the positive data that inflation is falling. However, if this trend continues, mortgage rates won’t be spiking higher.



Regarding the Fed pivot, although everyone talks about it, it’s a no-go until jobless claims break over the 323,000 level on a four-week moving average. Right now we are nowhere close for that level to break. Jobless claims fell in the most recent report, and the headline number fell to 204,000, while the four-week moving average is 213,500. Therefore, I don’t expect the Fed’s language to change much until the labor market breaks.

Continuing claims is another important weekly data line to track: it shows Americans who have filed for jobless benefits but haven’t been able to find a job in over a week. This number stabilized in the last report, but it has had a more noticeable rise than initial claims. 

How these data lines hold up is critical to the mortgage rate/bond yield discussion. If the bond market is getting a whiff that inflation has peaked, imagine how it will act when the labor market breaks negative. Traditionally, post-1982, this means bond yields — and mortgage rates — will go lower.

To sum it up, inventory is falling like it usually does at this time of the year, but some of that inventory can be tagged to the current better demand from lower mortgage rates. In time, we should see the spring seasonal increase; if we don’t see that this year, that is a double net negative for the housing market. 

Seasonal increases are the norm each year outside of 2020 because of COVID-19. I’m a big fan of getting inventory back to 2019 levels to have a buffer if rates fall and demand gets better, which would take inventory lower.

On the economic front, it’s inflation and labor; the inflation data looks like it has peaked, but the jobs data is still solid. We have a double treat this week, with inflation and labor data both coming out at the same time Thursday morning. 

If you haven’t checked out my 2023 forecast, read that here. Also, I’ll be joining Altos Research President Mike Simonsen for a virtual Housing Market Update on Feb. 6.

Read More

Continue Reading

Uncategorized

February Employment Situation

By Paul Gomme and Peter Rupert The establishment data from the BLS showed a 275,000 increase in payroll employment for February, outpacing the 230,000…

Published

on

By Paul Gomme and Peter Rupert

The establishment data from the BLS showed a 275,000 increase in payroll employment for February, outpacing the 230,000 average over the previous 12 months. The payroll data for January and December were revised down by a total of 167,000. The private sector added 223,000 new jobs, the largest gain since May of last year.

Temporary help services employment continues a steep decline after a sharp post-pandemic rise.

Average hours of work increased from 34.2 to 34.3. The increase, along with the 223,000 private employment increase led to a hefty increase in total hours of 5.6% at an annualized rate, also the largest increase since May of last year.

The establishment report, once again, beat “expectations;” the WSJ survey of economists was 198,000. Other than the downward revisions, mentioned above, another bit of negative news was a smallish increase in wage growth, from $34.52 to $34.57.

The household survey shows that the labor force increased 150,000, a drop in employment of 184,000 and an increase in the number of unemployed persons of 334,000. The labor force participation rate held steady at 62.5, the employment to population ratio decreased from 60.2 to 60.1 and the unemployment rate increased from 3.66 to 3.86. Remember that the unemployment rate is the number of unemployed relative to the labor force (the number employed plus the number unemployed). Consequently, the unemployment rate can go up if the number of unemployed rises holding fixed the labor force, or if the labor force shrinks holding the number unemployed unchanged. An increase in the unemployment rate is not necessarily a bad thing: it may reflect a strong labor market drawing “marginally attached” individuals from outside the labor force. Indeed, there was a 96,000 decline in those workers.

Earlier in the week, the BLS announced JOLTS (Job Openings and Labor Turnover Survey) data for January. There isn’t much to report here as the job openings changed little at 8.9 million, the number of hires and total separations were little changed at 5.7 million and 5.3 million, respectively.

As has been the case for the last couple of years, the number of job openings remains higher than the number of unemployed persons.

Also earlier in the week the BLS announced that productivity increased 3.2% in the 4th quarter with output rising 3.5% and hours of work rising 0.3%.

The bottom line is that the labor market continues its surprisingly (to some) strong performance, once again proving stronger than many had expected. This strength makes it difficult to justify any interest rate cuts soon, particularly given the recent inflation spike.

Read More

Continue Reading

Uncategorized

Mortgage rates fall as labor market normalizes

Jobless claims show an expanding economy. We will only be in a recession once jobless claims exceed 323,000 on a four-week moving average.

Published

on

Everyone was waiting to see if this week’s jobs report would send mortgage rates higher, which is what happened last month. Instead, the 10-year yield had a muted response after the headline number beat estimates, but we have negative job revisions from previous months. The Federal Reserve’s fear of wage growth spiraling out of control hasn’t materialized for over two years now and the unemployment rate ticked up to 3.9%. For now, we can say the labor market isn’t tight anymore, but it’s also not breaking.

The key labor data line in this expansion is the weekly jobless claims report. Jobless claims show an expanding economy that has not lost jobs yet. We will only be in a recession once jobless claims exceed 323,000 on a four-week moving average.

From the Fed: In the week ended March 2, initial claims for unemployment insurance benefits were flat, at 217,000. The four-week moving average declined slightly by 750, to 212,250


Below is an explanation of how we got here with the labor market, which all started during COVID-19.

1. I wrote the COVID-19 recovery model on April 7, 2020, and retired it on Dec. 9, 2020. By that time, the upfront recovery phase was done, and I needed to model out when we would get the jobs lost back.

2. Early in the labor market recovery, when we saw weaker job reports, I doubled and tripled down on my assertion that job openings would get to 10 million in this recovery. Job openings rose as high as to 12 million and are currently over 9 million. Even with the massive miss on a job report in May 2021, I didn’t waver.

Currently, the jobs openings, quit percentage and hires data are below pre-COVID-19 levels, which means the labor market isn’t as tight as it once was, and this is why the employment cost index has been slowing data to move along the quits percentage.  

2-US_Job_Quits_Rate-1-2

3. I wrote that we should get back all the jobs lost to COVID-19 by September of 2022. At the time this would be a speedy labor market recovery, and it happened on schedule, too

Total employment data

4. This is the key one for right now: If COVID-19 hadn’t happened, we would have between 157 million and 159 million jobs today, which would have been in line with the job growth rate in February 2020. Today, we are at 157,808,000. This is important because job growth should be cooling down now. We are more in line with where the labor market should be when averaging 140K-165K monthly. So for now, the fact that we aren’t trending between 140K-165K means we still have a bit more recovery kick left before we get down to those levels. 




From BLS: Total nonfarm payroll employment rose by 275,000 in February, and the unemployment rate increased to 3.9 percent, the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics reported today. Job gains occurred in health care, in government, in food services and drinking places, in social assistance, and in transportation and warehousing.

Here are the jobs that were created and lost in the previous month:

IMG_5092

In this jobs report, the unemployment rate for education levels looks like this:

  • Less than a high school diploma: 6.1%
  • High school graduate and no college: 4.2%
  • Some college or associate degree: 3.1%
  • Bachelor’s degree or higher: 2.2%
IMG_5093_320f22

Today’s report has continued the trend of the labor data beating my expectations, only because I am looking for the jobs data to slow down to a level of 140K-165K, which hasn’t happened yet. I wouldn’t categorize the labor market as being tight anymore because of the quits ratio and the hires data in the job openings report. This also shows itself in the employment cost index as well. These are key data lines for the Fed and the reason we are going to see three rate cuts this year.

Read More

Continue Reading

Uncategorized

Inside The Most Ridiculous Jobs Report In History: Record 1.2 Million Immigrant Jobs Added In One Month

Inside The Most Ridiculous Jobs Report In History: Record 1.2 Million Immigrant Jobs Added In One Month

Last month we though that the January…

Published

on

Inside The Most Ridiculous Jobs Report In History: Record 1.2 Million Immigrant Jobs Added In One Month

Last month we though that the January jobs report was the "most ridiculous in recent history" but, boy, were we wrong because this morning the Biden department of goalseeked propaganda (aka BLS) published the February jobs report, and holy crap was that something else. Even Goebbels would blush. 

What happened? Let's take a closer look.

On the surface, it was (almost) another blockbuster jobs report, certainly one which nobody expected, or rather just one bank out of 76 expected. Starting at the top, the BLS reported that in February the US unexpectedly added 275K jobs, with just one research analyst (from Dai-Ichi Research) expecting a higher number.

Some context: after last month's record 4-sigma beat, today's print was "only" 3 sigma higher than estimates. Needless to say, two multiple sigma beats in a row used to only happen in the USSR... and now in the US, apparently.

Before we go any further, a quick note on what last month we said was "the most ridiculous jobs report in recent history": it appears the BLS read our comments and decided to stop beclowing itself. It did that by slashing last month's ridiculous print by over a third, and revising what was originally reported as a massive 353K beat to just 229K,  a 124K revision, which was the biggest one-month negative revision in two years!

Of course, that does not mean that this month's jobs print won't be revised lower: it will be, and not just that month but every other month until the November election because that's the only tool left in the Biden admin's box: pretend the economic and jobs are strong, then revise them sharply lower the next month, something we pointed out first last summer and which has not failed to disappoint once.

To be fair, not every aspect of the jobs report was stellar (after all, the BLS had to give it some vague credibility). Take the unemployment rate, after flatlining between 3.4% and 3.8% for two years - and thus denying expectations from Sahm's Rule that a recession may have already started - in February the unemployment rate unexpectedly jumped to 3.9%, the highest since February 2022 (with Black unemployment spiking by 0.3% to 5.6%, an indicator which the Biden admin will quickly slam as widespread economic racism or something).

And then there were average hourly earnings, which after surging 0.6% MoM in January (since revised to 0.5%) and spooking markets that wage growth is so hot, the Fed will have no choice but to delay cuts, in February the number tumbled to just 0.1%, the lowest in two years...

... for one simple reason: last month's average wage surge had nothing to do with actual wages, and everything to do with the BLS estimate of hours worked (which is the denominator in the average wage calculation) which last month tumbled to just 34.1 (we were led to believe) the lowest since the covid pandemic...

... but has since been revised higher while the February print rose even more, to 34.3, hence why the latest average wage data was once again a product not of wages going up, but of how long Americans worked in any weekly period, in this case higher from 34.1 to 34.3, an increase which has a major impact on the average calculation.

While the above data points were examples of some latent weakness in the latest report, perhaps meant to give it a sheen of veracity, it was everything else in the report that was a problem starting with the BLS's latest choice of seasonal adjustments (after last month's wholesale revision), which have gone from merely laughable to full clownshow, as the following comparison between the monthly change in BLS and ADP payrolls shows. The trend is clear: the Biden admin numbers are now clearly rising even as the impartial ADP (which directly logs employment numbers at the company level and is far more accurate), shows an accelerating slowdown.

But it's more than just the Biden admin hanging its "success" on seasonal adjustments: when one digs deeper inside the jobs report, all sorts of ugly things emerge... such as the growing unprecedented divergence between the Establishment (payrolls) survey and much more accurate Household (actual employment) survey. To wit, while in January the BLS claims 275K payrolls were added, the Household survey found that the number of actually employed workers dropped for the third straight month (and 4 in the past 5), this time by 184K (from 161.152K to 160.968K).

This means that while the Payrolls series hits new all time highs every month since December 2020 (when according to the BLS the US had its last month of payrolls losses), the level of Employment has not budged in the past year. Worse, as shown in the chart below, such a gaping divergence has opened between the two series in the past 4 years, that the number of Employed workers would need to soar by 9 million (!) to catch up to what Payrolls claims is the employment situation.

There's more: shifting from a quantitative to a qualitative assessment, reveals just how ugly the composition of "new jobs" has been. Consider this: the BLS reports that in February 2024, the US had 132.9 million full-time jobs and 27.9 million part-time jobs. Well, that's great... until you look back one year and find that in February 2023 the US had 133.2 million full-time jobs, or more than it does one year later! And yes, all the job growth since then has been in part-time jobs, which have increased by 921K since February 2023 (from 27.020 million to 27.941 million).

Here is a summary of the labor composition in the past year: all the new jobs have been part-time jobs!

But wait there's even more, because now that the primary season is over and we enter the heart of election season and political talking points will be thrown around left and right, especially in the context of the immigration crisis created intentionally by the Biden administration which is hoping to import millions of new Democratic voters (maybe the US can hold the presidential election in Honduras or Guatemala, after all it is their citizens that will be illegally casting the key votes in November), what we find is that in February, the number of native-born workers tumbled again, sliding by a massive 560K to just 129.807 million. Add to this the December data, and we get a near-record 2.4 million plunge in native-born workers in just the past 3 months (only the covid crash was worse)!

The offset? A record 1.2 million foreign-born (read immigrants, both legal and illegal but mostly illegal) workers added in February!

Said otherwise, not only has all job creation in the past 6 years has been exclusively for foreign-born workers...

Source: St Louis Fed FRED Native Born and Foreign Born

... but there has been zero job-creation for native born workers since June 2018!

This is a huge issue - especially at a time of an illegal alien flood at the southwest border...

... and is about to become a huge political scandal, because once the inevitable recession finally hits, there will be millions of furious unemployed Americans demanding a more accurate explanation for what happened - i.e., the illegal immigration floodgates that were opened by the Biden admin.

Which is also why Biden's handlers will do everything in their power to insure there is no official recession before November... and why after the election is over, all economic hell will finally break loose. Until then, however, expect the jobs numbers to get even more ridiculous.

Tyler Durden Fri, 03/08/2024 - 13:30

Read More

Continue Reading

Trending