Connect with us

Uncategorized

Housing inventory is at its highest point all year

It looks like inventory will keep climbing into September. There are now 495,000 single-family homes unsold active on the market.

Published

on

Mortgage rates only kept climbing in the last week. Buyers in this real estate market notice these affordability changes, and so we can see in the data fewer home purchase offers, slightly climbing unsold inventory, and slightly more price reductions for the homes that are on the market. This is the same pattern as we talked about last week. The first half of the year had surprisingly resilient sales, but that is slowing again. Mortgage rates are at their highest level in 20 years because the economy just keeps reporting strong data. And every uptick in mortgage rates leads to a downtick in the number of home buyers in the market. 

Rising rates make more inventory. So how much inventory will we add this fall? Well as of now, these slowing signals are subtle. This housing market is much different from last year at this time. Last year, rates climbed dramatically and so did inventory. Now rates are inching up, and so is inventory. If mortgage rates jump to say 8%, that’s when we’d see big changes in inventory and home prices. Keep watching these numbers here. 

Inventory

Inventory of unsold homes on the market is ticking up. It now doesn’t look like next week will be the peak of inventory for the season. It looks like inventory will keep climbing into September. There are now 495,000 single-family homes unsold active on the market. Inventory rose by just under 1% again this week. 

This inventory climb at the end of August is not unusual. It’s not a rapid rise, but it also doesn’t appear to be leveling off. Inventory often peaks the last week of August, the fall has fewer sellers and it keeps shrinking through the holidays. Now because mortgage rates have been notably climbing for the last several weeks, we also expect inventory to keep climbing into September as fewer buyers make offers on the existing inventory. 

There are 10% fewer homes on the market now than last year at this time. Last year inventory spiked from March through July with spiking mortgage rates. Then it leveled off a bit. So this week inventory lost ground on last year. The inventory gain week to week was more than it was last year at this time. That’s the first time this happened in many months. Last week there were 10.5% fewer homes on the market, this week that’s only 10% fewer. This is one of the subtle signals that higher mortgage rates have slowed this year’s home buyers again. 

To understand the future of housing inventory in this country remember the Altos Rule. The Altos rule says that the more available inventory of homes to buy is the result of higher mortgage rates. If rates climb, so does inventory. If rates fall, inventory will fall. 

national-data-video-082123_Page_3

There are 365,000 single-family homes in contract now. That’s up a fraction from last week and 10% fewer than last year at this time. New pending sales of single-family homes going into contract this week came in at 63,000 vs 70,000 last year.  In this chart, the height of each bar is the total number of homes in contract that week. The light red portion of the bar represents those newly in contract. The sales rate has slowed since rates did their latest jump of over 7%. In fact, I’d expect the NAR headlines to keep falling on the pending sales measure as well. We could see the sales rate tick down to four million annually on their seasonally adjusted annual rate in the next couple of months. 

I’m looking forward to the time when the real-time data starts to grow and the sales rates look more bullish than the headlines, but that’s not happening yet.  As we watch the new pending home sales data each week, the next trend we’ll be looking for is how quickly the new pending sales rate shrinks this autumn. See in the chart how the light red portion of each bar shrank so quickly last fall. We had some recovery in the first half of this year. We started the year with 30% fewer homes in contract.

That gap narrowed to just 10% fewer. But we’ve been unable to get closer than that.  The market was accelerating this spring, but it is not doing so now. I suppose these negative swings are the other side of the coin for what I’ve called a soft landing in housing. Housing demand cratered, but home prices didn’t crash. Home prices declined in July and September last year, and recovered a bit in the first half of this year. Now demand is softening again and that will keep home prices from appreciating much from here.  

American homebuyers are very sensitive to mortgage interest rates. And while higher mortgage rates have hurt affordability for so many, it’s really the change in rates that spur changes in demand. Early this year we had more home buyers than sellers, even with rates in the six-percent range. When rates jump to 7.2% that’s when we see the demand data react accordingly. So it’s not the absolute level, it’s the change in rates that we should be paying attention to. 

Price

And we can see it in the home price reduction data too. Price reductions are about to inch above 2018 and 2019 again. 35.5% of the homes on the market have had price reductions. Price cuts always tick up late in the summer, and this year’s seasonal increase is speeding up just a bit with the recent higher mortgage rates. Each week we have slightly fewer buyers, making slightly fewer offers, so slightly more sellers cut their asking prices. 

national-data-video-082123_Page_4

Watching this price reduction curve has been so valuable lately. So insightful. In this chart, each line is a year. You can see last year’s light red line started climbing in March. That told us the pandemic frenzy was over. In September last year, price reductions spiked again with mortgage rates. This year, the dark red curve showed us how rapidly the market was recovering. That told us there was a floor on how far home prices could fall. It really highlights how effective this stat is for understanding the future of home sales prices. Right now 35.5% of the homes on the market have had a price cut.

This is a totally normal level. It is rising, not rising fast, it’s not a strong signal, but it is rising faster than in recent years for August. That tells us that sellers are seeing fewer buyers than they anticipated. This buyer slowdown means any home price appreciation we’ve had year over year is weakening and may be in jeopardy.

Tracking price reductions on the listed homes on the market is really insightful at the local level too. Right now we can see for example that Austin Texas has the most price reductions of any big market and that seems to be climbing.  You can use the Altos data to understand local differences which are so important right now.

national-data-video-082123_Page_5

The median price of single-family homes right now across the country is $449,900. That’s basically unchanged from last week and from last year. Prices tend to cluster around the big round numbers, in this case, $450,000, with a big group priced just under that for search purposes. So home prices are at this $450,000 plateau for a while. That’s the dark red line on this chart. See at the far right end the little plateau. Home sales prices in the future are falling because we can see the ask prices are very stable. Much more stable than they were last year at this time. 

The median price of the newly listed cohort this week is $399,000 again that’s also unchanged from last week. That’s the light red line on this chart. The price of the newly listed homes is 1.3% higher than last year at this time. This is when homes go on the market, the sellers and the listing agents know where the demand is, where the buyers are and they price accordingly. So the price of the new listings is an excellent leading indicator of where home sales prices will be out in the future. 

We’re in this tricky space looking at year over year home price changes now. Last year the market was slowing so quickly that the comparisons now to last year start to look easier. Prices were falling last year with frozen demand. This year the market is slowing gradually. You can expect that the annual home price appreciation would continue to improve even though the momentum is a bit negative right now. It looks like we’ll end 2023 with home prices up a few percent over where 2022 ended. 

national-data-video-082123_Page_6

And when we look at the price trends for the homes going into contract, we can see the earliest proxy for the sales which will actually close and get recorded in September and October. You can see that the last several weeks have put a little downward pressure on what home buyers are willing to pay. See how the dark red line was above last year for a few months and then in recent weeks, the dark red line is compressing closer to the light red line. That’s sales prices giving up their annual gains with higher mortgage rates. 

The median price of the homes that went into contract this week is $378,000. That’s up a tick from last week and over last year, but you can see in the chart the dark red line is drifting lower. Now, the sales comparison gets a lot easier in September when we had that big rate spike in 2022. So assuming we don’t have another mortgage rate spike, the annual price appreciation will continue to improve. On the other hand, if we see 8% mortgage rates, there’s no reason to believe that home prices can’t gap down again like they did last year. 

Again this is a very clear reaction to the latest surge in mortgage rates. We have fewer buyers and those buyers are willing to pay just a little bit less.  The opposite is true too. If rates were to drift lower, you can expect more buyers, less inventory, fewer price cuts and higher prices in data measures like this one the price of the newly pending sales each week. The data is very clear right now. 

See you soon. 

Mike Simonsen is the president of Altos Research.

Read More

Continue Reading

Uncategorized

February Employment Situation

By Paul Gomme and Peter Rupert The establishment data from the BLS showed a 275,000 increase in payroll employment for February, outpacing the 230,000…

Published

on

By Paul Gomme and Peter Rupert

The establishment data from the BLS showed a 275,000 increase in payroll employment for February, outpacing the 230,000 average over the previous 12 months. The payroll data for January and December were revised down by a total of 167,000. The private sector added 223,000 new jobs, the largest gain since May of last year.

Temporary help services employment continues a steep decline after a sharp post-pandemic rise.

Average hours of work increased from 34.2 to 34.3. The increase, along with the 223,000 private employment increase led to a hefty increase in total hours of 5.6% at an annualized rate, also the largest increase since May of last year.

The establishment report, once again, beat “expectations;” the WSJ survey of economists was 198,000. Other than the downward revisions, mentioned above, another bit of negative news was a smallish increase in wage growth, from $34.52 to $34.57.

The household survey shows that the labor force increased 150,000, a drop in employment of 184,000 and an increase in the number of unemployed persons of 334,000. The labor force participation rate held steady at 62.5, the employment to population ratio decreased from 60.2 to 60.1 and the unemployment rate increased from 3.66 to 3.86. Remember that the unemployment rate is the number of unemployed relative to the labor force (the number employed plus the number unemployed). Consequently, the unemployment rate can go up if the number of unemployed rises holding fixed the labor force, or if the labor force shrinks holding the number unemployed unchanged. An increase in the unemployment rate is not necessarily a bad thing: it may reflect a strong labor market drawing “marginally attached” individuals from outside the labor force. Indeed, there was a 96,000 decline in those workers.

Earlier in the week, the BLS announced JOLTS (Job Openings and Labor Turnover Survey) data for January. There isn’t much to report here as the job openings changed little at 8.9 million, the number of hires and total separations were little changed at 5.7 million and 5.3 million, respectively.

As has been the case for the last couple of years, the number of job openings remains higher than the number of unemployed persons.

Also earlier in the week the BLS announced that productivity increased 3.2% in the 4th quarter with output rising 3.5% and hours of work rising 0.3%.

The bottom line is that the labor market continues its surprisingly (to some) strong performance, once again proving stronger than many had expected. This strength makes it difficult to justify any interest rate cuts soon, particularly given the recent inflation spike.

Read More

Continue Reading

Uncategorized

Mortgage rates fall as labor market normalizes

Jobless claims show an expanding economy. We will only be in a recession once jobless claims exceed 323,000 on a four-week moving average.

Published

on

Everyone was waiting to see if this week’s jobs report would send mortgage rates higher, which is what happened last month. Instead, the 10-year yield had a muted response after the headline number beat estimates, but we have negative job revisions from previous months. The Federal Reserve’s fear of wage growth spiraling out of control hasn’t materialized for over two years now and the unemployment rate ticked up to 3.9%. For now, we can say the labor market isn’t tight anymore, but it’s also not breaking.

The key labor data line in this expansion is the weekly jobless claims report. Jobless claims show an expanding economy that has not lost jobs yet. We will only be in a recession once jobless claims exceed 323,000 on a four-week moving average.

From the Fed: In the week ended March 2, initial claims for unemployment insurance benefits were flat, at 217,000. The four-week moving average declined slightly by 750, to 212,250


Below is an explanation of how we got here with the labor market, which all started during COVID-19.

1. I wrote the COVID-19 recovery model on April 7, 2020, and retired it on Dec. 9, 2020. By that time, the upfront recovery phase was done, and I needed to model out when we would get the jobs lost back.

2. Early in the labor market recovery, when we saw weaker job reports, I doubled and tripled down on my assertion that job openings would get to 10 million in this recovery. Job openings rose as high as to 12 million and are currently over 9 million. Even with the massive miss on a job report in May 2021, I didn’t waver.

Currently, the jobs openings, quit percentage and hires data are below pre-COVID-19 levels, which means the labor market isn’t as tight as it once was, and this is why the employment cost index has been slowing data to move along the quits percentage.  

2-US_Job_Quits_Rate-1-2

3. I wrote that we should get back all the jobs lost to COVID-19 by September of 2022. At the time this would be a speedy labor market recovery, and it happened on schedule, too

Total employment data

4. This is the key one for right now: If COVID-19 hadn’t happened, we would have between 157 million and 159 million jobs today, which would have been in line with the job growth rate in February 2020. Today, we are at 157,808,000. This is important because job growth should be cooling down now. We are more in line with where the labor market should be when averaging 140K-165K monthly. So for now, the fact that we aren’t trending between 140K-165K means we still have a bit more recovery kick left before we get down to those levels. 




From BLS: Total nonfarm payroll employment rose by 275,000 in February, and the unemployment rate increased to 3.9 percent, the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics reported today. Job gains occurred in health care, in government, in food services and drinking places, in social assistance, and in transportation and warehousing.

Here are the jobs that were created and lost in the previous month:

IMG_5092

In this jobs report, the unemployment rate for education levels looks like this:

  • Less than a high school diploma: 6.1%
  • High school graduate and no college: 4.2%
  • Some college or associate degree: 3.1%
  • Bachelor’s degree or higher: 2.2%
IMG_5093_320f22

Today’s report has continued the trend of the labor data beating my expectations, only because I am looking for the jobs data to slow down to a level of 140K-165K, which hasn’t happened yet. I wouldn’t categorize the labor market as being tight anymore because of the quits ratio and the hires data in the job openings report. This also shows itself in the employment cost index as well. These are key data lines for the Fed and the reason we are going to see three rate cuts this year.

Read More

Continue Reading

Uncategorized

Inside The Most Ridiculous Jobs Report In History: Record 1.2 Million Immigrant Jobs Added In One Month

Inside The Most Ridiculous Jobs Report In History: Record 1.2 Million Immigrant Jobs Added In One Month

Last month we though that the January…

Published

on

Inside The Most Ridiculous Jobs Report In History: Record 1.2 Million Immigrant Jobs Added In One Month

Last month we though that the January jobs report was the "most ridiculous in recent history" but, boy, were we wrong because this morning the Biden department of goalseeked propaganda (aka BLS) published the February jobs report, and holy crap was that something else. Even Goebbels would blush. 

What happened? Let's take a closer look.

On the surface, it was (almost) another blockbuster jobs report, certainly one which nobody expected, or rather just one bank out of 76 expected. Starting at the top, the BLS reported that in February the US unexpectedly added 275K jobs, with just one research analyst (from Dai-Ichi Research) expecting a higher number.

Some context: after last month's record 4-sigma beat, today's print was "only" 3 sigma higher than estimates. Needless to say, two multiple sigma beats in a row used to only happen in the USSR... and now in the US, apparently.

Before we go any further, a quick note on what last month we said was "the most ridiculous jobs report in recent history": it appears the BLS read our comments and decided to stop beclowing itself. It did that by slashing last month's ridiculous print by over a third, and revising what was originally reported as a massive 353K beat to just 229K,  a 124K revision, which was the biggest one-month negative revision in two years!

Of course, that does not mean that this month's jobs print won't be revised lower: it will be, and not just that month but every other month until the November election because that's the only tool left in the Biden admin's box: pretend the economic and jobs are strong, then revise them sharply lower the next month, something we pointed out first last summer and which has not failed to disappoint once.

To be fair, not every aspect of the jobs report was stellar (after all, the BLS had to give it some vague credibility). Take the unemployment rate, after flatlining between 3.4% and 3.8% for two years - and thus denying expectations from Sahm's Rule that a recession may have already started - in February the unemployment rate unexpectedly jumped to 3.9%, the highest since February 2022 (with Black unemployment spiking by 0.3% to 5.6%, an indicator which the Biden admin will quickly slam as widespread economic racism or something).

And then there were average hourly earnings, which after surging 0.6% MoM in January (since revised to 0.5%) and spooking markets that wage growth is so hot, the Fed will have no choice but to delay cuts, in February the number tumbled to just 0.1%, the lowest in two years...

... for one simple reason: last month's average wage surge had nothing to do with actual wages, and everything to do with the BLS estimate of hours worked (which is the denominator in the average wage calculation) which last month tumbled to just 34.1 (we were led to believe) the lowest since the covid pandemic...

... but has since been revised higher while the February print rose even more, to 34.3, hence why the latest average wage data was once again a product not of wages going up, but of how long Americans worked in any weekly period, in this case higher from 34.1 to 34.3, an increase which has a major impact on the average calculation.

While the above data points were examples of some latent weakness in the latest report, perhaps meant to give it a sheen of veracity, it was everything else in the report that was a problem starting with the BLS's latest choice of seasonal adjustments (after last month's wholesale revision), which have gone from merely laughable to full clownshow, as the following comparison between the monthly change in BLS and ADP payrolls shows. The trend is clear: the Biden admin numbers are now clearly rising even as the impartial ADP (which directly logs employment numbers at the company level and is far more accurate), shows an accelerating slowdown.

But it's more than just the Biden admin hanging its "success" on seasonal adjustments: when one digs deeper inside the jobs report, all sorts of ugly things emerge... such as the growing unprecedented divergence between the Establishment (payrolls) survey and much more accurate Household (actual employment) survey. To wit, while in January the BLS claims 275K payrolls were added, the Household survey found that the number of actually employed workers dropped for the third straight month (and 4 in the past 5), this time by 184K (from 161.152K to 160.968K).

This means that while the Payrolls series hits new all time highs every month since December 2020 (when according to the BLS the US had its last month of payrolls losses), the level of Employment has not budged in the past year. Worse, as shown in the chart below, such a gaping divergence has opened between the two series in the past 4 years, that the number of Employed workers would need to soar by 9 million (!) to catch up to what Payrolls claims is the employment situation.

There's more: shifting from a quantitative to a qualitative assessment, reveals just how ugly the composition of "new jobs" has been. Consider this: the BLS reports that in February 2024, the US had 132.9 million full-time jobs and 27.9 million part-time jobs. Well, that's great... until you look back one year and find that in February 2023 the US had 133.2 million full-time jobs, or more than it does one year later! And yes, all the job growth since then has been in part-time jobs, which have increased by 921K since February 2023 (from 27.020 million to 27.941 million).

Here is a summary of the labor composition in the past year: all the new jobs have been part-time jobs!

But wait there's even more, because now that the primary season is over and we enter the heart of election season and political talking points will be thrown around left and right, especially in the context of the immigration crisis created intentionally by the Biden administration which is hoping to import millions of new Democratic voters (maybe the US can hold the presidential election in Honduras or Guatemala, after all it is their citizens that will be illegally casting the key votes in November), what we find is that in February, the number of native-born workers tumbled again, sliding by a massive 560K to just 129.807 million. Add to this the December data, and we get a near-record 2.4 million plunge in native-born workers in just the past 3 months (only the covid crash was worse)!

The offset? A record 1.2 million foreign-born (read immigrants, both legal and illegal but mostly illegal) workers added in February!

Said otherwise, not only has all job creation in the past 6 years has been exclusively for foreign-born workers...

Source: St Louis Fed FRED Native Born and Foreign Born

... but there has been zero job-creation for native born workers since June 2018!

This is a huge issue - especially at a time of an illegal alien flood at the southwest border...

... and is about to become a huge political scandal, because once the inevitable recession finally hits, there will be millions of furious unemployed Americans demanding a more accurate explanation for what happened - i.e., the illegal immigration floodgates that were opened by the Biden admin.

Which is also why Biden's handlers will do everything in their power to insure there is no official recession before November... and why after the election is over, all economic hell will finally break loose. Until then, however, expect the jobs numbers to get even more ridiculous.

Tyler Durden Fri, 03/08/2024 - 13:30

Read More

Continue Reading

Trending