Connect with us

Spread & Containment

Eli Lilly 2022: Old reliable

For all its forays elsewhere, diabetes remains the bedrock of Lilly’s business – and, if the Mounjaro launch goes as hoped, will continue to be so…

Published

on

For all its forays elsewhere, diabetes remains the bedrock of Lilly’s business – and, if the Mounjaro launch goes as hoped, will continue to be so for a long time to come.

By Joshua Slatko • josh.slatko@medadnews.com

 

Eli Lilly

Lilly Corporate Center

Indianapolis, IN 46285

317-276-2000 • lilly.com

Financial Performance
  2021 2020 1H 2022 1H 2021
Revenue $28,318 $24,540 $14,298 $13,546
Net income $5,582 $6,194 $2,855 $2,746
Diluted EPS $6.12 $6.79 $3.16 $3.01
R&D expense $7,026 $6,086 $3,392 $3,327
All figures are in millions of dollars, except EPS.

Best-selling products

All sales are in millions of dollars.

2021 sales

  • Trulicity $6,472 
  • Humalog $2,453 
  • COVID-19 antibodies $2,239 
  • Taltz $2,213 
  • Alimta $2,061 
  • Jardiance $1,491 
  • Verzenio $1,350 
  • Humulin $1,223 
  • Olumiant $1,115 
  • Cyramza $1,033 
  • Basaglar $893 
  • Forteo $802 
  • Cialis $718 
  • Cymbalta $582 
  • Emgality $577 
  • Erbitux $548

1H 2022 sales

  • Trulicity $3,653 
  • COVID-19 antibodies $1,599 
  • Taltz $1,094 
  • Humalog $1,065 
  • Verzenio $1,058 
  • Jardiance $880 
  • Alimta $572 
  • Humulin $547 
  • Cyramza $462 
  • Olumiant $442 
  • Basaglar $366 
  • Cialis $365 
  • Emgality $307 
  • Forteo $276 
  • Erbitux $263

Outcomes Creativity Index Score: 7

  • Manny Awards — 2
  • Cannes Lions — N/A
  • Clio Health — N/A
  • Creative Floor Awards — 2
  • London International Awards – 2
  • MM+M Awards — N/A
  • One Show — 1

 

David Ricks, Lilly

Chair and CEO David A. Ricks

The diabetes focus just keeps paying dividends for Lilly. While the company has expanded the scope of its portfolio beyond its traditional specialty in recent years with successful products such as Taltz (autoimmune), Verzenio (breast cancer), and Olumiant (autoimmune and COVID), Lilly’s biggest seller (Trulicity), one of its fastest growers (Jardiance), and the company’s most promising new launch (Mounjaro) all target diabetes. Lilly’s diabetes treatments still account for nearly half of the company’s total revenue – and perhaps more, soon, if Mounjaro performs as hoped. 

“We had an exciting quarter with the highly anticipated U.S. launch of Mounjaro, the first of potentially five new medicines we intend to launch by the end of 2023,” said David A. Ricks, Lilly’s chair and CEO, in the Q2 2022 earnings announcement. “We are pleased with the underlying strength of our core business, and we expect our new medicines will add to our growth through the rest of the decade. We are entering a compelling era in our company’s history, as we continue our efforts to expand the number of people our medicines can help.”

Lilly’s top-line revenue was $28.32 billion in 2021, up 15.4 percent compared with the previous year. Net income declined by 9.9 percent to $5.58 billion, and earnings per share were down 67 cents to $6.12. In the first half of 2022 Lilly’s top line rose another 5.6 percent to $14.3 billion, with net income up 4 percent to $2.86 billion and EPS rising 15 cents to $3.16. Company leaders project that full-year EPS for 2022 will fall between $6.96 and $7.11. 

Acquisitions and partnerships

In January, Lilly acquired exclusive rights to Entos Pharmaceuticals’ Fusogenix nucleic acid delivery technology to research, develop, and commercialize nucleic acid products targeting the central and peripheral nervous system. This technology, company leaders say, provides an opportunity for Lilly to access a novel delivery platform technology with the potential to solve a key delivery challenge for many nucleic acid therapeutic modalities.

Under the terms of the research and collaboration agreement, Lilly and Entos agreed to multiple programs focused on the development of proteo-lipid vehicles (PLV) for delivery of therapeutic cargo supplied by Lilly to targets in the central and peripheral nervous systems. Entos is responsible for the generation, development, and optimization of PLVs using its proprietary Fusogenix platform technology. Lilly is responsible for selecting PLVs for clinical development and commercialization. Entos received an initial payment of $50 million, which included an equity investment by Lilly in Entos. For each of the programs under the collaboration, Entos is also eligible to receive up to $400 million in potential developmental and commercial milestone payments, as well as royalties upon the successful development and commercialization of products.

Product performance

Trulicity

Sales of Trulicity grew by more than a quarter in 2021, to $6.47 billion.

The type 2 diabetes treatment Trulicity remained at the top of Lilly’s portfolio in 2021, enjoying a sales bounce of 27.7 percent to $6.47 billion for the year. According to company leaders, this was due to increased demand in the United States and increased volume internationally. In the first half of 2022, sales of Trulicity rose another 22.3 percent to $3.65 billion.

In June, Lilly announced results from the Phase III AWARD-PEDS clinical trial showing that Trulicity (at 0.75 mg and 1.5 mg doses) led to superior A1C reductions at 26 weeks versus placebo in youth and adolescents (ages 10 to 17 years old) with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled with diet and exercise, with or without metformin and/or basal insulin. The study met all of its primary and secondary glycemic control objectives: percent of patients achieving A1C of <7%, fasting plasma glucose change from baseline, and mean change in A1C in the individual dose groups. Significant reductions in both A1C and fasting glucose were observed through week 26 compared to placebo. Among patients treated with Trulicity (pooled data), 51.5 percent reached an A1C of <7% based on treatment regimen estimand.

The AWARD-PEDS trial evaluated the efficacy and safety of once-weekly Trulicity 0.75 mg and 1.5 mg compared to placebo in youth and adolescents with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled with diet and exercise, with or without metformin and/or basal insulin. Study participants included 55 percent identifying as Hispanic/Latino and 15 percent as Black/African American, with a mean age of 14.5 years and a mean body mass index of 34.1 kg/m2. The mean duration of diabetes was 2.0 years, mean A1C was 8.1 percent, and mean weight was 90.5 kg. The primary objective was to demonstrate superiority of Trulicity (pooled dose groups) versus placebo for change from baseline in A1C at 26 weeks. The study achieved this primary objective, and both doses of Trulicity (0.75 mg and 1.5 mg) achieved superior and statistically significant A1C reductions from baseline compared to placebo and also achieved significant results for key secondary endpoints of glycemic control at 26 weeks. 

Humalog, an injectable human insulin analog for treating diabetes, generated $2.45 billion in sales for Lilly in 2021, a decline of 6.6 percent. Company leaders say this was driven by lower realized prices in the United States due to higher contracted rebates and discounts and increased utilization in more highly rebated government segments. In the first half of 2022, sales of Humalog fell another 13.1 percent to $1.07 billion.

Sales of Lilly’s COVID-19 antibodies bamlanivimab and etesevimab, treatments for mild to moderate COVID-19 for higher-risk patients and for post-exposure prophylaxis in certain individuals for the prevention of SARS-CoV-2 infection, totaled $2.24 billion in 2021, more than double their 2020 figure of $871 million. First-half 2022 sales of the COVID-19 antibodies rose 66.7 percent to $1.6 billion.

The autoimmune drug Taltz generated $2.21 billion in sales for Lilly in 2021, an improvement of 23.7 percent. Company leaders credited this to increased demand domestically and increased volume internationally. In the first half of 2022, sales of Taltz were up another 12.6 percent to $1.09 billion.

In August, Lilly announced the availability of a new, citrate-free formulation of Taltz injection 80 mg/mL. The new formulation, approved by the FDA in May 2022, includes the same active ingredient as the original version. The new Taltz formulation significantly reduced injection site pain experienced by some people immediately following injection as shown by an 86 percent decrease in a visual analog scale of pain versus the original form.

Jardiance

Jardiance enjoyed growth of more than 30 percent during first-half 2022, helped along by a new heart failure approval from the FDA.

The type 2 diabetes drug Jardiance brought in sales of $1.49 billion for Lilly in 2021, 29.2 percent better than the previous year. According to company leaders, this was due to increased demand in the United States and increased volume internationally. In the first half of 2022, Jardiance sales rose 31.5 percent to $880 million.

In February, the FDA approved Jardiance 10 mg to reduce the risk of cardiovascular death and hospitalization for heart failure in adults with heart failure. This approval was based on results from the landmark EMPEROR-Preserved Phase III trial, which investigated the effect of Jardiance 10 mg compared with placebo once daily, both on top of standard of care therapy, in 5,988 adults with heart failure with LVEF over 40 percent. In the trial, Jardiance demonstrated a 21 percent relative risk reduction (3.3 percent absolute risk reduction) for the composite primary endpoint of cardiovascular death or hospitalization for heart failure. In both EMPEROR-Preserved and EMPEROR-Reduced, the benefit was generally consistent across LVEF subgroups. A key secondary endpoint analysis from EMPEROR-Preserved showed that Jardiance reduced the relative risk of first and recurrent hospitalizations for heart failure by 27 percent.

In March, Lilly and Boehringer Ingelheim announced that the EMPA-KIDNEY trial, evaluating the effect of Jardiance in adults with chronic kidney disease, would stop early based on a recommendation from the trial’s Independent Data Monitoring Committee. This followed a formal interim assessment that met prespecified criteria for positive efficacy. As the largest SGLT2 inhibitor trial in CKD to date, EMPA-KIDNEY evaluated the efficacy and safety of Jardiance in adults with CKD who are frequently seen in clinical practice but who have been under-represented in previous SGLT2 inhibitor trials, therefore addressing a critical unmet need. The trial included people with mildly to severely reduced eGFR (a measure of kidney function); with normal and increased levels of albumin (a type of protein present in the urine); with and without diabetes; and with CKD attributable to a wide range of underlying causes. Detailed trial results were expected in 2022.

Also in March, Lilly and Boehringer Ingelheim announced that adults hospitalized for acute heart failure were 36 percent more likely to experience a clinical benefit over 90 days if initiated on Jardiance following stabilization and prior to discharge compared with placebo in the Phase III EMPULSE trial. Clinical benefit reflected a composite primary endpoint that included all-cause mortality, frequency of heart failure events, time to first heart failure event, and symptoms as measured by the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire total symptom score (KCCQ-TSS). The overall clinical benefit with Jardiance was consistent for those with either new or pre-existing heart failure, for those with or without diabetes and for those with either preserved or reduced ejection fraction. In an exploratory secondary endpoint, Jardiance significantly improved KCCQ-TSS from baseline to day 90 by 4.5 points versus placebo.

In June, Lilly and Boehringer Ingelheim announced that two analyses of the final U.S. data from the EMPagliflozin compaRative effectIveness and SafEty (EMPRISE) real-world study showed Jardiance was associated with a reduction in risk of hospitalization for heart failure versus two other classes of glucose-lowering therapies in adults with type 2 diabetes in routine care. Relative risk reductions were 50 percent versus dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors and 30 percent versus glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists.

Compared with DPP-4 inhibitors, Jardiance was also associated with a 40 percent reduction in relative risk of all-cause mortality in people who had Medicare. In the overall EMPRISE population, Jardiance was associated with a 12 percent reduction in the risk of the composite outcome of myocardial infarction or stroke compared with DPP-4 inhibitors. Compared with GLP-1 receptor agonists, Jardiance was associated with similar risks of heart attack, stroke, and all-cause mortality. All results for Jardiance compared with GLP-1 receptor agonists, and with liraglutide (a GLP-1 receptor agonist) specifically, were consistent for people with and without cardiovascular disease.

Results from the EMPRISE real-world study, which assessed the first five years of use of Jardiance in the United States, complement previously reported data from the landmark EMPA-REG OUTCOME trial, in which Jardiance showed a 35 percent relative risk reduction in hospitalization for heart failure compared with placebo in adults with type 2 diabetes and established cardiovascular disease. EMPA-REG OUTCOME also showed a 38 percent relative risk reduction in cardiovascular death with Jardiance versus placebo.

Verzenio, a treatment for HR+, HER2- metastatic breast cancer and high-risk early breast cancer, produced $1.35 billion in sales in 2021, up 47.9 percent compared with the previous year. This, Lilly executives say, was driven by increased demand domestically and increased volume internationally. In the first half of 2022, Verzenio sales were up another 73.4 percent to $1.06 billion.

Olumiant, Lilly

Helped along by use for treatment of COVID-19, sales of Olumiant nearly doubled in 2021 to $1.12 billion.

The autoimmune product Olumiant earned $1.12 billion in sales in 2021, nearly double its previous total of $639 million. This was driven in part by the use of Olumiant for the treatment of hospitalized patients with COVID-19. First-half 2022 sales of Olumiant rose another 10 percent to $442 million.

In January, Lilly announced that the company had decided to discontinue Phase III development of Olumiant in lupus based on top-line efficacy results from two pivotal Phase III trials (SLE-BRAVE-I and II). In SLE-BRAVE-I, the Olumiant 4-mg oral dose met the primary endpoint, demonstrating a statistically significant reduction in disease activity as measured by the proportion of adults with active lupus who achieved an SRI-4 response (a composite measurement of overall disease activity) at Week 52 compared to placebo. The SLE-BRAVE-II study, which also studied adults with active lupus, did not meet the primary endpoint of SRI-4 response. Key secondary endpoints were not met in either study.

At the same time, Lilly announced that the company was in ongoing discussion with the FDA regarding the status of the sNDA for Olumiant for the treatment of adults with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis. According to executives, the company did not have alignment with the FDA on the indicated population. Given the agency’s position, company leaders suggested a possibility that this could lead to a complete response letter. The efficacy and safety profile of Olumiant was evaluated in eight atopic dermatitis clinical trials (six double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled studies and two long-term extension studies) inclusive of patients whose disease is not adequately controlled with topical prescription therapies or when those therapies are not advisable. The safety profile in these trials was consistent with previously published Olumiant data.

In May, the FDA approved Olumiant for the treatment of COVID-19 in hospitalized adults requiring supplemental oxygen, non-invasive or invasive mechanical ventilation, or extracorporeal membrane oxygenation with a recommended dose of 4-mg once daily for 14 days or until hospital discharge, whichever comes first. FDA’s approval was supported by results from two randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled Phase III studies (ACTT-2 and COV-BARRIER, including the COV-BARRIER OS 7 addendum study). Olumiant has been available in the United States under Emergency Use Authorization for this indication since November 2020.

In June, the FDA approved Olumiant as a first-in-disease systemic treatment for adults with severe alopecia areata, available as 4-mg, 2-mg and 1-mg tablets. The recommended dose is Olumiant 2-mg/day, with an increase to 4-mg/day if treatment response is inadequate. The approval was based on Lilly’s BRAVE-AA1 and BRAVE-AA2 trials, the largest Phase III AA clinical trial program completed to date, evaluating the efficacy and safety of Olumiant in 1,200 adult patients with severe AA (≥50 percent scalp hair loss as defined by a Severity of Alopecia Tool [SALT] score ≥50). Across the studies at 36 weeks, 17-22 percent of patients taking Olumiant 2-mg/day and 32-35 percent of patients taking Olumiant 4-mg/day achieved 80 percent or more scalp hair coverage, compared to 3-5 percent taking placebo. Additionally, 11-13 percent of patients taking Olumiant 2-mg/day and 24-26 percent of patients taking Olumiant 4-mg/day achieved 90 percent or more hair coverage, compared to 1-4 percent of patients taking placebo; results for Olumiant 2-mg/day were not statistically significant under the multiplicity control plan for BRAVE-AA2. Among patients with substantial eyebrow and eyelash hair loss at baseline, improvements in eyebrow and eyelash coverage were seen for patients taking Olumiant 4-mg daily at 36 weeks.

In the pipeline

In February, the FDA issued an Emergency Use Authorization for bebtelovimab, an antibody that demonstrates neutralization against the Omicron variant of COVID-19. Bebtelovimab can now be used for the treatment of mild-to-moderate COVID-19 in adults and pediatric patients (12 years of age and older weighing at least 40 kg) with positive results of direct SARS-CoV-2 viral testing, and who are at high risk for progression to severe COVID-19, including hospitalization or death, and for whom alternative COVID-19 treatment options approved or authorized by the FDA are not accessible or clinically appropriate. Concurrently with FDA’s action, Lilly announced an agreement with the U.S. government to supply up to 600,000 doses of bebtelovimab for $720 million. 

The data supporting this EUA were primarily based on analyses from the Phase II BLAZE-4 trial (NCT04634409), treatment arms 9-14. This trial was a Phase II, randomized, clinical trial evaluating treatment of non-hospitalized patients with mild-to-moderate COVID-19 who were treated with the authorized dose of bebtelovimab (175 mg) alone or together with 700 mg bamlanivimab and 1,400 mg of etesevimab. Pseudovirus and authentic virus testing have demonstrated that bebtelovimab retains full neutralizing activity against Omicron. In addition, pseudovirus testing with bebtelovimab demonstrated that it retains neutralization against all other known variants of interest and concern, including BA.2.

Also in February, Lilly announced that patients with moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis who took mirikizumab achieved statistically superior rates of clinical remission at 12 weeks compared to patients taking placebo in the pivotal LUCENT-1 Phase III study. Patients who took mirikizumab also achieved statistically significant improvements across key secondary endpoints including clinical, symptomatic, endoscopic, and histologic (cellular level of tissue) measures, compared to those taking placebo.

This global study of 1,162 patients included patients who had never tried a biologic treatment (biologic-naïve) and harder-to-treat patients who had previously taken a biologic that failed. One in four patients treated with mirikizumab (24.2 percent) achieved the primary endpoint of clinical remission at 12 weeks, compared to one in seven on placebo (13.3 percent), indicating improved symptom relief and resolution or near resolution of inflammation. Nearly two-thirds of patients taking mirikizumab (63.5 percent) achieved clinical response, compared to less than half of patients treated with placebo (42.2 percent). 

Nearly half of patients taking mirikizumab (45.5 percent) achieved symptomatic remission at 12 weeks, compared to less than a third of patients taking placebo (27.9 percent). In as early as four weeks, more than one in five patients who took mirikizumab (21.8 percent) experienced a rapid improvement in their symptoms, compared to one in eight patients taking placebo (12.9 percent).

In as early as two weeks and sustained through 12 weeks, patients treated with mirikizumab had a statistically significant reduction on an 11-point bowel urgency severity scale. At 12 weeks, patients had an average reduction of 2.59 (2.32 to 2.85) points, compared to an average reduction of 1.63 (1.18 to 2.09) points for patients on placebo (p<0.00001). The 2-week bowel urgency endpoint was pre-defined but was not multiplicity-controlled.

In March, Lilly received a complete response letter from the FDA regarding the biologics license application for sintilimab in combination with pemetrexed and platinum chemotherapy for the first-line treatment of people with nonsquamous non-small cell lung cancer. The letter indicated that the review cycle was complete but that FDA was unable to approve the application in its current form, consistent with the outcome of the Oncologic Drugs Advisory Committee Meeting in February. The CRL included a recommendation for an additional clinical study, specifically a multiregional clinical trial comparing standard of care therapy for first-line metastatic NSCLC to sintilimab with chemotherapy utilizing a non-inferiority design with an overall survival endpoint. Lilly and partner developer Innovent Biologics Inc. are assessing next steps for the sintilimab program in the United States. 

In April, Lilly announced updated data from the Phase I/II LIBRETTO-001 trial of Retevmo in patients with RET fusion-positive non-small cell lung cancer. Among 247 patients previously treated with platinum chemotherapy, the confirmed objective response rate was 61.1 percent and among 69 treatment-naïve patients, the confirmed ORR was 84.1 percent. Twenty-six patients had measurable central nervous system metastases at baseline and treatment with Retevmo resulted in a CNS ORR of 84.6 percent, with 22 patients having a confirmed best response of complete response or partial response.

At a median follow-up of approximately two years in both the treatment-naïve and platinum-chemotherapy pretreated populations, median duration of response was estimated at 20.2 (55.2 percent censoring rate; 20.3 months median duration of follow-up) and 28.6 (60.9 percent censoring rate; 21.2 months median duration of follow-up) months, respectively and median progression free survival is estimated at 22.0 (53.6 percent censoring rate; 21.9 months median duration of follow-up) and 24.9 (55.9 percent censoring rate; 24.7 months median duration of follow-up) months, respectively. Of the 26 patients with measurable CNS disease, Retevmo treatment resulted in a median intracranial PFS of 19.4 months.

Also in April, Lilly announced that, at 16 weeks, 70 percent of patients with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis receiving lebrikizumab combined with standard-of-care topical corticosteroids (TCS) achieved at least 75 percent improvement in overall disease severity (EASI-75) in the Phase III ADhere trial. Among patients taking lebrikizumab plus TCS, 41 percent achieved clear or almost clear skin (IGA) at 16 weeks compared to 22 percent of patients taking placebo plus TCS. At 16 weeks, 70 percent of patients taking lebrikizumab plus TCS achieved an EASI-75 response compared to 42 percent taking placebo plus TCS. Differences between patients receiving lebrikizumab in combination with TCS and placebo with TCS were observed as early as four weeks for EASI-75.

Patients treated with lebrikizumab plus TCS also achieved statistically significant improvements across key secondary endpoints including skin clearance and itching, interference of itch on sleep, and quality of life measures, compared to placebo with TCS. Clinically meaningful differences were observed as early as four weeks for itch, interference of itch on sleep, and quality of life measures.

In May, the FDA approved Mounjaro injection, Lilly’s once-weekly GIP (glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide) and GLP-1 (glucagon-like peptide-1) receptor agonist indicated as an adjunct to diet and exercise to improve glycemic control in adults with type 2 diabetes. The approval was based on results from the Phase III SURPASS program, which included active comparators of injectable semaglutide 1 mg, insulin glargine, and insulin degludec. Efficacy was evaluated for Mounjaro 5 mg, 10 mg, and 15 mg used alone or in combination with commonly prescribed diabetes medications, including metformin, SGLT2 inhibitors, sulfonylureas, and insulin glargine. Participants in the SURPASS program achieved average A1C reductions between 1.8 percent and 2.1 percent for Mounjaro 5 mg and between 1.7 percent and 2.4 percent for both Mounjaro 10 mg and Mounjaro 15 mg. While not indicated for weight loss, mean change in body weight was a key secondary endpoint in all SURPASS studies. Participants treated with Mounjaro lost between 12 lb. (5 kg) and 25 lb. (11 kg) on average.

Also in May, Lilly announced results of the Phase III LUCENT-2 study showing that patients with ulcerative colitis who responded to mirikizumab at 12 weeks achieved and maintained statistically superior and clinically meaningful improvements at one year compared to placebo across the primary endpoint of clinical remission and all key secondary endpoints, including bowel urgency severity, using a novel, patient-reported outcome measure. Lilly submitted regulatory applications for mirikizumab in UC to the FDA and the European Medicines Agency in the first quarter of 2022; regulatory decisions are expected next year. 

Mirikizumab was superior to placebo on clinical, symptomatic, endoscopic, and histologic endpoints regardless of previous failure to TNF inhibitors, tofacitinib, or other biologics. Among patients who had responded to 12-week induction treatment with mirikizumab, one-half of patients receiving mirikizumab maintenance treatment (49.9 percent) achieved clinical remission at one year compared to one-fourth of patients on placebo (25.1 percent). Nearly two-thirds of patients receiving mirikizumab who achieved clinical remission at 12 weeks maintained clinical remission at one year (63.6 percent) compared to one-third of patients on placebo (36.9 percent). Nearly all patients receiving mirikizumab who achieved clinical remission at one year were not taking corticosteroids for at least three months prior to the end of maintenance treatment (97.8 percent).

A patient-centric, 11-point scale developed by Lilly was used to assess changes in bowel urgency severity. Among patients who achieved clinical response in the 12-week induction study and who had a baseline urgency severity of 3 or greater, more than two in five patients on mirikizumab (42.9 percent) achieved resolution or near resolution of bowel urgency severity at one year compared to one in four on placebo (25 percent). Among patients who achieved clinical response in the 12-week induction study, patients receiving mirikizumab had a statistically significant average reduction in bowel urgency severity of 3.80 (3.53 to 4.07) at one year, compared to 2.74 (2.35 to 3.14) points for patients on placebo. 

In June, the New England Journal of Medicine published detailed results from Lilly’s Phase III SURMOUNT-1 clinical trial evaluating Mounjaro for the treatment of obesity or overweight. Mounjaro met both co-primary endpoints of superior mean percent change in body weight from baseline and greater percentage of participants achieving body weight reductions of at least 5 percent compared to placebo for both estimands.

For the efficacy estimand, participants taking Mounjaro achieved average weight reductions of 16.0 percent (35 lb. or 16 kg on 5 mg), 21.4 percent (49 lb. or 22 kg on 10 mg) and 22.5 percent (52 lb. or 24 kg on 15 mg), compared to placebo (2.4 percent, 5 lb. or 2 kg). Additionally, 89 percent (5 mg) and 96 percent (10 mg and 15 mg) of people taking Mounjaro achieved at least 5 percent body weight reductions compared to 28 percent of those taking placebo.

Also in June, Lilly reported new data from a mechanism of action study and new analyses of the global registration program for Mounjaro. The mechanism of action study was a 28-week, randomized, double-blind, parallel study to evaluate the effect of Mounjaro 15 mg compared to placebo and to injectable semaglutide 1 mg. The primary endpoint compared the effect of Mounjaro 15 mg versus placebo on total clamp disposition index at 28 weeks. The secondary objectives compared the effects of Mounjaro 15 mg to placebo and to injectable semaglutide 1 mg on energy intake, appetite, and body composition in adults with type 2 diabetes as measured by change from baseline.

At 28 weeks, participants taking Mounjaro had significantly greater reductions in weight and in fat mass compared to those taking injectable semaglutide 1 mg and placebo. Weight reduction in the study was 11.2 kg (24.7 lb., Mounjaro 15 mg), 6.9 kg (15.2 lb., injectable semaglutide 1 mg) and 0 kg (placebo). Fat mass reduction was 9.7 kg (21.4 lb., Mounjaro 15 mg) and 5.9 kg (13.0 lb., injectable semaglutide 1 mg). Further, treatment with Mounjaro 15 mg and injectable semaglutide 1 mg resulted in significant reductions from baseline in energy intake (-348.4 kcal and -284.1 kcal, respectively) as well as reductions in appetite ratings.

Lilly also reported a post-hoc analysis of all five studies within the SURPASS global registration program. This analysis assessed the relationship between A1C and body weight reductions with Mounjaro treatment (5 mg, 10 mg, or 15 mg) across the SURPASS-1 through -5 clinical trials. Results showed that between 87 percent and 97 percent of participants taking Mounjaro experienced both A1C and weight reductions.

Additionally, the company announced results from an exploratory analysis of SURPASS-2 and SURPASS-3 evaluating the median time taken to achieve certain glycemic targets (i.e., median time to A1C <7% and ≤6.5%) and the median time taken to achieve at least 5% weight loss. The analysis compared the time to reach the A1C targets from baseline among participants treated with Mounjaro (5 mg, 10 mg, and 15 mg) versus those treated with injectable semaglutide 1 mg (SURPASS-2) or those treated with titrated insulin degludec (SURPASS-3), and the time to reach the weight target among participants treated with Mounjaro or injectable semaglutide 1 mg. Participants taking all three doses of Mounjaro reached these A1C targets about four weeks sooner than those taking injectable semaglutide 1 mg, and between four weeks and 12 weeks sooner than those taking titrated insulin degludec.

Specifically, results showed median time to achieve A1C <7%: 8 weeks (Mounjaro), 12 weeks (injectable semaglutide 1 mg), 12 weeks (titrated insulin degludec). Median time to achieve A1C ≤6.5% was 12 weeks (Mounjaro), 16 weeks (injectable semaglutide 1 mg), 24 weeks (titrated insulin degludec). And median time to achieve ≥5% weight reduction was 12 weeks (Mounjaro 10 mg and 15 mg), 16 weeks (Mounjaro 5 mg), 24 weeks (injectable semaglutide 1 mg).

Also in June, Lilly announced topline results from one-year analyses of the efficacy and safety of lebrikizumab, the company’s investigational IL-13 inhibitor for the treatment of patients with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis. The new findings from the Phase III clinical trials (ADvocate 1 and 2) showed eight out of ten patients who achieved clinical response (EASI-75) with lebrikizumab monotherapy at 16 weeks maintained skin clearance at one year of treatment with the once every two weeks or four weeks regimen. Additionally, patients treated with lebrikizumab maintained itch relief across the two trials over the one-year period.

In ADvocate 1, 79 percent of patients who received lebrikizumab every four weeks and 79 percent of patients who received lebrikizumab every two weeks maintained 75 percent or greater skin improvement (EASI-75) at one year of treatment. Additionally, 85 percent of patients who received lebrikizumab every four weeks and 77 percent of patients who received lebrikizumab every two weeks maintained EASI-75 response in ADvocate 2 at one year of treatment. 

In September, Lilly released detailed results from its Phase III monotherapy studies in atopic dermatitis showing that investigational lebrikizumab provided robust and durable improvements in skin clearance and itch for patients who achieved a clinical response at Week 16 through one year of treatment. Lebrikizumab, a high-affinity and potent IL-13 inhibitor, delivered similar results when dosed once every four weeks or once every two weeks after Week 16. Efficacy with every four week dosing, after a 16-week induction period with lebrikizumab every two weeks, was similar to that of every two week dosing. 

Lilly and partner developer Almirall SA planned to submit regulatory applications for lebrikizumab to the FDA and the European Medicines Agency during 2022.

Read More

Continue Reading

Government

Survey Shows Declining Concerns Among Americans About COVID-19

Survey Shows Declining Concerns Among Americans About COVID-19

A new survey reveals that only 20% of Americans view covid-19 as "a major threat"…

Published

on

Survey Shows Declining Concerns Among Americans About COVID-19

A new survey reveals that only 20% of Americans view covid-19 as "a major threat" to the health of the US population - a sharp decline from a high of 67% in July 2020.

(SARMDY/Shutterstock)

What's more, the Pew Research Center survey conducted from Feb. 7 to Feb. 11 showed that just 10% of Americans are concerned that they will  catch the disease and require hospitalization.

"This data represents a low ebb of public concern about the virus that reached its height in the summer and fall of 2020, when as many as two-thirds of Americans viewed COVID-19 as a major threat to public health," reads the report, which was published March 7.

According to the survey, half of the participants understand the significance of researchers and healthcare providers in understanding and treating long COVID - however 27% of participants consider this issue less important, while 22% of Americans are unaware of long COVID.

What's more, while Democrats were far more worried than Republicans in the past, that gap has narrowed significantly.

"In the pandemic’s first year, Democrats were routinely about 40 points more likely than Republicans to view the coronavirus as a major threat to the health of the U.S. population. This gap has waned as overall levels of concern have fallen," reads the report.

More via the Epoch Times;

The survey found that three in ten Democrats under 50 have received an updated COVID-19 vaccine, compared with 66 percent of Democrats ages 65 and older.

Moreover, 66 percent of Democrats ages 65 and older have received the updated COVID-19 vaccine, while only 24 percent of Republicans ages 65 and older have done so.

“This 42-point partisan gap is much wider now than at other points since the start of the outbreak. For instance, in August 2021, 93 percent of older Democrats and 78 percent of older Republicans said they had received all the shots needed to be fully vaccinated (a 15-point gap),” it noted.

COVID-19 No Longer an Emergency

The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) recently issued its updated recommendations for the virus, which no longer require people to stay home for five days after testing positive for COVID-19.

The updated guidance recommends that people who contracted a respiratory virus stay home, and they can resume normal activities when their symptoms improve overall and their fever subsides for 24 hours without medication.

“We still must use the commonsense solutions we know work to protect ourselves and others from serious illness from respiratory viruses, this includes vaccination, treatment, and staying home when we get sick,” CDC director Dr. Mandy Cohen said in a statement.

The CDC said that while the virus remains a threat, it is now less likely to cause severe illness because of widespread immunity and improved tools to prevent and treat the disease.

Importantly, states and countries that have already adjusted recommended isolation times have not seen increased hospitalizations or deaths related to COVID-19,” it stated.

The federal government suspended its free at-home COVID-19 test program on March 8, according to a website set up by the government, following a decrease in COVID-19-related hospitalizations.

According to the CDC, hospitalization rates for COVID-19 and influenza diseases remain “elevated” but are decreasing in some parts of the United States.

Tyler Durden Sun, 03/10/2024 - 22:45

Read More

Continue Reading

International

‘I couldn’t stand the pain’: the Turkish holiday resort that’s become an emergency dental centre for Britons who can’t get treated at home

The crisis in NHS dentistry is driving increasing numbers abroad for treatment. Here are some of their stories.

This clinic in the Turkish resort of Antalya is the official 'dental sponsor' of the Miss England competition. Diana Ibanez-Tirado, Author provided

It’s a hot summer day in the Turkish city of Antalya, a Mediterranean resort with golden beaches, deep blue sea and vibrant nightlife. The pool area of the all-inclusive resort is crammed with British people on sun loungers – but they aren’t here for a holiday. This hotel is linked to a dental clinic that organises treatment packages, and most of these guests are here to see a dentist.

From Norwich, two women talk about gums and injections. A man from Wales holds a tissue close to his mouth and spits blood – he has just had two molars extracted.

The dental clinic organises everything for these dental “tourists” throughout their treatment, which typically lasts from three to 15 days. The stories I hear of what has caused them to travel to Turkey are strikingly similar: all have struggled to secure dental treatment at home on the NHS.

“The hotel is nice and some days I go to the beach,” says Susan*, a hairdresser in her mid-30s from Norwich. “But really, we aren’t tourists like in a proper holiday. We come here because we have no choice. I couldn’t stand the pain.”

Seaside beach resort with mountains in the distance
The Turkish Mediterranean resort of Antalya. Akimov Konstantin/Shutterstock

This is Susan’s second visit to Antalya. She explains that her ordeal started two years earlier:

I went to an NHS dentist who told me I had gum disease … She did some cleaning to my teeth and gums but it got worse. When I ate, my teeth were moving … the gums were bleeding and it was very painful. I called to say I was in pain but the clinic was not accepting NHS patients any more.

The only option the dentist offered Susan was to register as a private patient:

I asked how much. They said £50 for x-rays and then if the gum disease got worse, £300 or so for extraction. Four of them were moving – imagine: £1,200 for losing your teeth! Without teeth I’d lose my clients, but I didn’t have the money. I’m a single mum. I called my mum and cried.

Susan’s mother told her about a friend of hers who had been to Turkey for treatment, then together they found a suitable clinic:

The prices are so much cheaper! Tooth extraction, x-rays, consultations – it all comes included. The flight and hotel for seven days cost the same as losing four teeth in Norwich … I had my lower teeth removed here six months ago, now I’ve got implants … £2,800 for everything – hotel, transfer, treatments. I only paid the flights separately.

In the UK, roughly half the adult population suffers from periodontitis – inflammation of the gums caused by plaque bacteria that can lead to irreversible loss of gums, teeth, and bone. Regular reviews by a dentist or hygienist are required to manage this condition. But nine out of ten dental practices cannot offer NHS appointments to new adult patients, while eight in ten are not accepting new child patients.

Some UK dentists argue that Britons who travel abroad for treatment do so mainly for cosmetic procedures. They warn that dental tourism is dangerous, and that if their treatment goes wrong, dentists in the UK will be unable to help because they don’t want to be responsible for further damage. Susan shrugs this off:

Dentists in England say: ‘If you go to Turkey, we won’t touch you [afterwards].’ But I don’t worry because there are no appointments at home anyway. They couldn’t help in the first place, and this is why we are in Turkey.

‘How can we pay all this money?’

As a social anthropologist, I travelled to Turkey a number of times in 2023 to investigate the crisis of NHS dentistry, and the journeys abroad that UK patients are increasingly making as a result. I have relatives in Istanbul and have been researching migration and trading patterns in Turkey’s largest city since 2016.

In August 2023, I visited the resort in Antalya, nearly 400 miles south of Istanbul. As well as Susan, I met a group from a village in Wales who said there was no provision of NHS dentistry back home. They had organised a two-week trip to Turkey: the 12-strong group included a middle-aged couple with two sons in their early 20s, and two couples who were pensioners. By going together, Anya tells me, they could support each other through their different treatments:

I’ve had many cavities since I was little … Before, you could see a dentist regularly – you didn’t even think about it. If you had pain or wanted a regular visit, you phoned and you went … That was in the 1990s, when I went to the dentist maybe every year.

Anya says that once she had children, her family and work commitments meant she had no time to go to the dentist. Then, years later, she started having serious toothache:

Every time I chewed something, it hurt. I ate soups and soft food, and I also lost weight … Even drinking was painful – tea: pain, cold water: pain. I was taking paracetamol all the time! I went to the dentist to fix all this, but there were no appointments.

Anya was told she would have to wait months, or find a dentist elsewhere:

A private clinic gave me a list of things I needed done. Oh my God, almost £6,000. My husband went too – same story. How can we pay all this money? So we decided to come to Turkey. Some people we know had been here, and others in the village wanted to come too. We’ve brought our sons too – they also need to be checked and fixed. Our whole family could be fixed for less than £6,000.

By the time they travelled, Anya’s dental problems had turned into a dental emergency. She says she could not live with the pain anymore, and was relying on paracetamol.

In 2023, about 6 million adults in the UK experienced protracted pain (lasting more than two weeks) caused by toothache. Unintentional paracetamol overdose due to dental pain is a significant cause of admissions to acute medical units. If left untreated, tooth infections can spread to other parts of the body and cause life-threatening complications – and on rare occasions, death.

In February 2024, police were called to manage hundreds of people queuing outside a newly opened dental clinic in Bristol, all hoping to be registered or seen by an NHS dentist. One in ten Britons have admitted to performing “DIY dentistry”, of which 20% did so because they could not find a timely appointment. This includes people pulling out their teeth with pliers and using superglue to repair their teeth.

In the 1990s, dentistry was almost entirely provided through NHS services, with only around 500 solely private dentists registered. Today, NHS dentist numbers in England are at their lowest level in a decade, with 23,577 dentists registered to perform NHS work in 2022-23, down 695 on the previous year. Furthermore, the precise division of NHS and private work that each dentist provides is not measured.

The COVID pandemic created longer waiting lists for NHS treatment in an already stretched public service. In Bridlington, Yorkshire, people are now reportedly having to wait eight-to-nine years to get an NHS dental appointment with the only remaining NHS dentist in the town.

In his book Patients of the State (2012), Argentine sociologist Javier Auyero describes the “indignities of waiting”. It is the poor who are mostly forced to wait, he writes. Queues for state benefits and public services constitute a tangible form of power over the marginalised. There is an ethnic dimension to this story, too. Data suggests that in the UK, patients less likely to be effective in booking an NHS dental appointment are non-white ethnic groups and Gypsy or Irish travellers, and that it is particularly challenging for refugees and asylum-seekers to access dental care.


This article is part of Conversation Insights
The Insights team generates long-form journalism derived from interdisciplinary research. The team is working with academics from different backgrounds who have been engaged in projects aimed at tackling societal and scientific challenges.


In 2022, I experienced my own dental emergency. An infected tooth was causing me debilitating pain, and needed root canal treatment. I was advised this would cost £71 on the NHS, plus £307 for a follow-up crown – but that I would have to wait months for an appointment. The pain became excruciating – I could not sleep, let alone wait for months. In the same clinic, privately, I was quoted £1,300 for the treatment (more than half my monthly income at the time), or £295 for a tooth extraction.

I did not want to lose my tooth because of lack of money. So I bought a flight to Istanbul immediately for the price of the extraction in the UK, and my tooth was treated with root canal therapy by a private dentist there for £80. Including the costs of travelling, the total was a third of what I was quoted to be treated privately in the UK. Two years on, my treated tooth hasn’t given me any more problems.

A better quality of life

Not everyone is in Antalya for emergency procedures. The pensioners from Wales had contacted numerous clinics they found on the internet, comparing prices, treatments and hotel packages at least a year in advance, in a carefully planned trip to get dental implants – artificial replacements for tooth roots that help support dentures, crowns and bridges.

Street view of a dental clinic in Antalya, Turkey
Dental clinic in Antalya, Turkey. Diana Ibanez-Tirado, CC BY-NC-ND

In Turkey, all the dentists I speak to (most of whom cater mainly for foreigners, including UK nationals) consider implants not a cosmetic or luxurious treatment, but a development in dentistry that gives patients who are able to have the procedure a much better quality of life. This procedure is not available on the NHS for most of the UK population, and the patients I meet in Turkey could not afford implants in private clinics back home.

Paul is in Antalya to replace his dentures, which have become uncomfortable and irritating to his gums, with implants. He says he couldn’t find an appointment to see an NHS dentist. His wife Sonia went through a similar procedure the year before and is very satisfied with the results, telling me: “Why have dentures that you need to put in a glass overnight, in the old style? If you can have implants, I say, you’re better off having them.”

Most of the dental tourists I meet in Antalya are white British: this city, known as the Turkish Riviera, has developed an entire economy catering to English-speaking tourists. In 2023, more than 1.3 million people visited the city from the UK, up almost 15% on the previous year.


Read more: NHS dentistry is in crisis – are overseas dentists the answer?


In contrast, the Britons I meet in Istanbul are predominantly from a non-white ethnic background. Omar, a pensioner of Pakistani origin in his early 70s, has come here after waiting “half a year” for an NHS appointment to fix the dental bridge that is causing him pain. Omar’s son had been previously for a hair transplant, and was offered a free dental checkup by the same clinic, so he suggested it to his father. Having worked as a driver for a manufacturing company for two decades in Birmingham, Omar says he feels disappointed to have contributed to the British economy for so long, only to be “let down” by the NHS:

At home, I must wait and wait and wait to get a bridge – and then I had many problems with it. I couldn’t eat because the bridge was uncomfortable and I was in pain, but there were no appointments on the NHS. I asked a private dentist and they recommended implants, but they are far too expensive [in the UK]. I started losing weight, which is not a bad thing at the beginning, but then I was worrying because I couldn’t chew and eat well and was losing more weight … Here in Istanbul, I got dental implants – US$500 each, problem solved! In England, each implant is maybe £2,000 or £3,000.

In the waiting area of another clinic in Istanbul, I meet Mariam, a British woman of Iraqi background in her late 40s, who is making her second visit to the dentist here. Initially, she needed root canal therapy after experiencing severe pain for weeks. Having been quoted £1,200 in a private clinic in outer London, Mariam decided to fly to Istanbul instead, where she was quoted £150 by a dentist she knew through her large family. Even considering the cost of the flight, Mariam says the decision was obvious:

Dentists in England are so expensive and NHS appointments so difficult to find. It’s awful there, isn’t it? Dentists there blamed me for my rotten teeth. They say it’s my fault: I don’t clean or I ate sugar, or this or that. I grew up in a village in Iraq and didn’t go to the dentist – we were very poor. Then we left because of war, so we didn’t go to a dentist … When I arrived in London more than 20 years ago, I didn’t speak English, so I still didn’t go to the dentist … I think when you move from one place to another, you don’t go to the dentist unless you are in real, real pain.

In Istanbul, Mariam has opted not only for the urgent root canal treatment but also a longer and more complex treatment suggested by her consultant, who she says is a renowned doctor from Syria. This will include several extractions and implants of back and front teeth, and when I ask what she thinks of achieving a “Hollywood smile”, Mariam says:

Who doesn’t want a nice smile? I didn’t come here to be a model. I came because I was in pain, but I know this doctor is the best for implants, and my front teeth were rotten anyway.

Dentists in the UK warn about the risks of “overtreatment” abroad, but Mariam appears confident that this is her opportunity to solve all her oral health problems. Two of her sisters have already been through a similar treatment, so they all trust this doctor.

Alt text
An Istanbul clinic founded by Afghan dentists has a message for its UK customers. Diana Ibanez-Tirado, CC BY-NC-ND

The UK’s ‘dental deserts’

To get a fuller understanding of the NHS dental crisis, I’ve also conducted 20 interviews in the UK with people who have travelled or were considering travelling abroad for dental treatment.

Joan, a 50-year-old woman from Exeter, tells me she considered going to Turkey and could have afforded it, but that her back and knee problems meant she could not brave the trip. She has lost all her lower front teeth due to gum disease and, when I meet her, has been waiting 13 months for an NHS dental appointment. Joan tells me she is living in “shame”, unable to smile.

In the UK, areas with extremely limited provision of NHS dental services – known as as “dental deserts” – include densely populated urban areas such as Portsmouth and Greater Manchester, as well as many rural and coastal areas.

In Felixstowe, the last dentist taking NHS patients went private in 2023, despite the efforts of the activist group Toothless in Suffolk to secure better access to NHS dentists in the area. It’s a similar story in Ripon, Yorkshire, and in Dumfries & Galloway, Scotland, where nearly 25,000 patients have been de-registered from NHS dentists since 2021.

Data shows that 2 million adults must travel at least 40 miles within the UK to access dental care. Branding travel for dental care as “tourism” carries the risk of disguising the elements of duress under which patients move to restore their oral health – nationally and internationally. It also hides the immobility of those who cannot undertake such journeys.

The 90-year-old woman in Dumfries & Galloway who now faces travelling for hours by bus to see an NHS dentist can hardly be considered “tourism” – nor the Ukrainian war refugees who travelled back from West Sussex and Norwich to Ukraine, rather than face the long wait to see an NHS dentist.

Many people I have spoken to cannot afford the cost of transport to attend dental appointments two hours away – or they have care responsibilities that make it impossible. Instead, they are forced to wait in pain, in the hope of one day securing an appointment closer to home.

Billboard advertising a dental clinic in Turkey
Dental clinics have mushroomed in recent years in Turkey, thanks to the influx of foreign patients seeking a wide range of treatments. Diana Ibanez-Tirado, CC BY-NC-ND

‘Your crisis is our business’

The indignities of waiting in the UK are having a big impact on the lives of some local and foreign dentists in Turkey. Some neighbourhoods are rapidly changing as dental and other health clinics, usually in luxurious multi-storey glass buildings, mushroom. In the office of one large Istanbul medical complex with sections for hair transplants and dentistry (plus one linked to a hospital for more extensive cosmetic surgery), its Turkish owner and main investor tells me:

Your crisis is our business, but this is a bazaar. There are good clinics and bad clinics, and unfortunately sometimes foreign patients do not know which one to choose. But for us, the business is very good.

This clinic only caters to foreign patients. The owner, an architect by profession who also developed medical clinics in Brazil, describes how COVID had a major impact on his business:

When in Europe you had COVID lockdowns, Turkey allowed foreigners to come. Many people came for ‘medical tourism’ – we had many patients for cosmetic surgery and hair transplants. And that was when the dental business started, because our patients couldn’t see a dentist in Germany or England. Then more and more patients started to come for dental treatments, especially from the UK and Ireland. For them, it’s very, very cheap here.

The reasons include the value of the Turkish lira relative to the British pound, the low cost of labour, the increasing competition among Turkish clinics, and the sheer motivation of dentists here. While most dentists catering to foreign patients are from Turkey, others have arrived seeking refuge from war and violence in Syria, Iraq, Afghanistan, Iran and beyond. They work diligently to rebuild their lives, careers and lost wealth.

Regardless of their origin, all dentists in Turkey must be registered and certified. Hamed, a Syrian dentist and co-owner of a new clinic in Istanbul catering to European and North American patients, tells me:

I know that you say ‘Syrian’ and people think ‘migrant’, ‘refugee’, and maybe think ‘how can this dentist be good?’ – but Syria, before the war, had very good doctors and dentists. Many of us came to Turkey and now I have a Turkish passport. I had to pass the exams to practise dentistry here – I study hard. The exams are in Turkish and they are difficult, so you cannot say that Syrian doctors are stupid.

Hamed talks excitedly about the latest technology that is coming to his profession: “There are always new materials and techniques, and we cannot stop learning.” He is about to travel to Paris to an international conference:

I can say my techniques are very advanced … I bet I put more implants and do more bone grafting and surgeries every week than any dentist you know in England. A good dentist is about practice and hand skills and experience. I work hard, very hard, because more and more patients are arriving to my clinic, because in England they don’t find dentists.

Dental equipment in a Turkish treatment room
Dentists in Turkey boast of using the latest technology. Diana Ibanez-Tirado, CC BY-NC-ND

While there is no official data about the number of people travelling from the UK to Turkey for dental treatment, investors and dentists I speak to consider that numbers are rocketing. From all over the world, Turkey received 1.2 million visitors for “medical tourism” in 2022, an increase of 308% on the previous year. Of these, about 250,000 patients went for dentistry. One of the most renowned dental clinics in Istanbul had only 15 British patients in 2019, but that number increased to 2,200 in 2023 and is expected to reach 5,500 in 2024.

Like all forms of medical care, dental treatments carry risks. Most clinics in Turkey offer a ten-year guarantee for treatments and a printed clinical history of procedures carried out, so patients can show this to their local dentists and continue their regular annual care in the UK. Dental treatments, checkups and maintaining a good oral health is a life-time process, not a one-off event.

Many UK patients, however, are caught between a rock and a hard place – criticised for going abroad, yet unable to get affordable dental care in the UK before and after their return. The British Dental Association has called for more action to inform these patients about the risks of getting treated overseas – and has warned UK dentists about the legal implications of treating these patients on their return. But this does not address the difficulties faced by British patients who are being forced to go abroad in search of affordable, often urgent dental care.

A global emergency

The World Health Organization states that the explosion of oral disease around the world is a result of the “negligent attitude” that governments, policymakers and insurance companies have towards including oral healthcare under the umbrella of universal healthcare. It as if the health of our teeth and mouth is optional; somehow less important than treatment to the rest of our body. Yet complications from untreated tooth decay can lead to hospitalisation.

The main causes of oral health diseases are untreated tooth decay, severe gum disease, toothlessness, and cancers of the lip and oral cavity. Cases grew during the pandemic, when little or no attention was paid to oral health. Meanwhile, the global cosmetic dentistry market is predicted to continue growing at an annual rate of 13% for the rest of this decade, confirming the strong relationship between socioeconomic status and access to oral healthcare.

In the UK since 2018, there have been more than 218,000 admissions to hospital for rotting teeth, of which more than 100,000 were children. Some 40% of children in the UK have not seen a dentist in the past 12 months. The role of dentists in prevention of tooth decay and its complications, and in the early detection of mouth cancer, is vital. While there is a 90% survival rate for mouth cancer if spotted early, the lack of access to dental appointments is causing cases to go undetected.

The reasons for the crisis in NHS dentistry are complex, but include: the real-term cuts in funding to NHS dentistry; the challenges of recruitment and retention of dentists in rural and coastal areas; pay inequalities facing dental nurses, most of them women, who are being badly hit by the cost of living crisis; and, in England, the 2006 Dental Contract that does not remunerate dentists in a way that encourages them to continue seeing NHS patients.

The UK is suffering a mass exodus of the public dentistry workforce, with workers leaving the profession entirely or shifting to the private sector, where payments and life-work balance are better, bureaucracy is reduced, and prospects for career development look much better. A survey of general dental practitioners found that around half have reduced their NHS work since the pandemic – with 43% saying they were likely to go fully private, and 42% considering a career change or taking early retirement.

Reversing the UK’s dental crisis requires more commitment to substantial reform and funding than the “recovery plan” announced by Victoria Atkins, the secretary of state for health and social care, on February 7.

The stories I have gathered show that people travelling abroad for dental treatment don’t see themselves as “tourists” or vanity-driven consumers of the “Hollywood smile”. Rather, they have been forced by the crisis in NHS dentistry to seek out a service 1,500 miles away in Turkey that should be a basic, affordable right for all, on their own doorstep.

*Names in this article have been changed to protect the anonymity of the interviewees.


For you: more from our Insights series:

To hear about new Insights articles, join the hundreds of thousands of people who value The Conversation’s evidence-based news. Subscribe to our newsletter.

Diana Ibanez Tirado receives funding from the School of Global Studies, University of Sussex.

Read More

Continue Reading

Spread & Containment

The Coming Of The Police State In America

The Coming Of The Police State In America

Authored by Jeffrey Tucker via The Epoch Times,

The National Guard and the State Police are now…

Published

on

The Coming Of The Police State In America

Authored by Jeffrey Tucker via The Epoch Times,

The National Guard and the State Police are now patrolling the New York City subway system in an attempt to do something about the explosion of crime. As part of this, there are bag checks and new surveillance of all passengers. No legislation, no debate, just an edict from the mayor.

Many citizens who rely on this system for transportation might welcome this. It’s a city of strict gun control, and no one knows for sure if they have the right to defend themselves. Merchants have been harassed and even arrested for trying to stop looting and pillaging in their own shops.

The message has been sent: Only the police can do this job. Whether they do it or not is another matter.

Things on the subway system have gotten crazy. If you know it well, you can manage to travel safely, but visitors to the city who take the wrong train at the wrong time are taking grave risks.

In actual fact, it’s guaranteed that this will only end in confiscating knives and other things that people carry in order to protect themselves while leaving the actual criminals even more free to prey on citizens.

The law-abiding will suffer and the criminals will grow more numerous. It will not end well.

When you step back from the details, what we have is the dawning of a genuine police state in the United States. It only starts in New York City. Where is the Guard going to be deployed next? Anywhere is possible.

If the crime is bad enough, citizens will welcome it. It must have been this way in most times and places that when the police state arrives, the people cheer.

We will all have our own stories of how this came to be. Some might begin with the passage of the Patriot Act and the establishment of the Department of Homeland Security in 2001. Some will focus on gun control and the taking away of citizens’ rights to defend themselves.

My own version of events is closer in time. It began four years ago this month with lockdowns. That’s what shattered the capacity of civil society to function in the United States. Everything that has happened since follows like one domino tumbling after another.

It goes like this:

1) lockdown,

2) loss of moral compass and spreading of loneliness and nihilism,

3) rioting resulting from citizen frustration, 4) police absent because of ideological hectoring,

5) a rise in uncontrolled immigration/refugees,

6) an epidemic of ill health from substance abuse and otherwise,

7) businesses flee the city

8) cities fall into decay, and that results in

9) more surveillance and police state.

The 10th stage is the sacking of liberty and civilization itself.

It doesn’t fall out this way at every point in history, but this seems like a solid outline of what happened in this case. Four years is a very short period of time to see all of this unfold. But it is a fact that New York City was more-or-less civilized only four years ago. No one could have predicted that it would come to this so quickly.

But once the lockdowns happened, all bets were off. Here we had a policy that most directly trampled on all freedoms that we had taken for granted. Schools, businesses, and churches were slammed shut, with various levels of enforcement. The entire workforce was divided between essential and nonessential, and there was widespread confusion about who precisely was in charge of designating and enforcing this.

It felt like martial law at the time, as if all normal civilian law had been displaced by something else. That something had to do with public health, but there was clearly more going on, because suddenly our social media posts were censored and we were being asked to do things that made no sense, such as mask up for a virus that evaded mask protection and walk in only one direction in grocery aisles.

Vast amounts of the white-collar workforce stayed home—and their kids, too—until it became too much to bear. The city became a ghost town. Most U.S. cities were the same.

As the months of disaster rolled on, the captives were let out of their houses for the summer in order to protest racism but no other reason. As a way of excusing this, the same public health authorities said that racism was a virus as bad as COVID-19, so therefore it was permitted.

The protests had turned to riots in many cities, and the police were being defunded and discouraged to do anything about the problem. Citizens watched in horror as downtowns burned and drug-crazed freaks took over whole sections of cities. It was like every standard of decency had been zapped out of an entire swath of the population.

Meanwhile, large checks were arriving in people’s bank accounts, defying every normal economic expectation. How could people not be working and get their bank accounts more flush with cash than ever? There was a new law that didn’t even require that people pay rent. How weird was that? Even student loans didn’t need to be paid.

By the fall, recess from lockdown was over and everyone was told to go home again. But this time they had a job to do: They were supposed to vote. Not at the polling places, because going there would only spread germs, or so the media said. When the voting results finally came in, it was the absentee ballots that swung the election in favor of the opposition party that actually wanted more lockdowns and eventually pushed vaccine mandates on the whole population.

The new party in control took note of the large population movements out of cities and states that they controlled. This would have a large effect on voting patterns in the future. But they had a plan. They would open the borders to millions of people in the guise of caring for refugees. These new warm bodies would become voters in time and certainly count on the census when it came time to reapportion political power.

Meanwhile, the native population had begun to swim in ill health from substance abuse, widespread depression, and demoralization, plus vaccine injury. This increased dependency on the very institutions that had caused the problem in the first place: the medical/scientific establishment.

The rise of crime drove the small businesses out of the city. They had barely survived the lockdowns, but they certainly could not survive the crime epidemic. This undermined the tax base of the city and allowed the criminals to take further control.

The same cities became sanctuaries for the waves of migrants sacking the country, and partisan mayors actually used tax dollars to house these invaders in high-end hotels in the name of having compassion for the stranger. Citizens were pushed out to make way for rampaging migrant hordes, as incredible as this seems.

But with that, of course, crime rose ever further, inciting citizen anger and providing a pretext to bring in the police state in the form of the National Guard, now tasked with cracking down on crime in the transportation system.

What’s the next step? It’s probably already here: mass surveillance and censorship, plus ever-expanding police power. This will be accompanied by further population movements, as those with the means to do so flee the city and even the country and leave it for everyone else to suffer.

As I tell the story, all of this seems inevitable. It is not. It could have been stopped at any point. A wise and prudent political leadership could have admitted the error from the beginning and called on the country to rediscover freedom, decency, and the difference between right and wrong. But ego and pride stopped that from happening, and we are left with the consequences.

The government grows ever bigger and civil society ever less capable of managing itself in large urban centers. Disaster is unfolding in real time, mitigated only by a rising stock market and a financial system that has yet to fall apart completely.

Are we at the middle stages of total collapse, or at the point where the population and people in leadership positions wise up and decide to put an end to the downward slide? It’s hard to know. But this much we do know: There is a growing pocket of resistance out there that is fed up and refuses to sit by and watch this great country be sacked and taken over by everything it was set up to prevent.

Tyler Durden Sat, 03/09/2024 - 16:20

Read More

Continue Reading

Trending