Connect with us

Government

Coronavirus Response: Six Questions About Kushner’s Failed Efforts

Coronavirus Response: Six Questions About Kushner’s Failed Efforts

Published

on

Kushner Efforts culture of health COVID-19 testing failures operate safely resume in-person classes impact Chemours Top 10 greatest heroes of the coronavirus pandemic

As the Trump Administration Continues to Botch its Coronavirus Response, Here Are 6 Questions That Need to be Addressed in Light of Recent Reports About Kushner’s Failed Efforts

Know more about Russia than your friends:

Get our free ebook on how the Soviet Union became Putin's Russia.

Q1 2020 hedge fund letters, conferences and more

WASHINGTON, D.C. – According to reports in The Washington Post, The New York Times, and other outlets, “About two dozen employees from Boston Consulting Group, Insight, McKinsey and other firms have volunteered their time — some on paid vacation leave from their jobs and others without pay — to aid the Trump administration’s response to the coronavirus pandemic, according to administration officials and others familiar with the arrangement.”

Kushner put these volunteers in positions of power, even though they reportedly lacked experience or expertise in crisis management, government procurement, or healthcare. The Kushner effort further undermined the government’s already lackluster response to combat COVID-19.

Questions About Kushner's Failed Efforts

Still, there are many unanswered questions about Kushner’s ‘volunteers.’ Here are a few:

1. The volunteers’ employers have been awarded at least 20 million in government contracts for work related to COVID-19. This begs this question if these “volunteers” were truly volunteers? And by calling them “volunteers” what requirements were they not subject to that they would be if they were labeled as contractors?

McKinsey Has Received $11.7 Million In Federal Contracts Since March 20th For COVID-19 Response Activities

APRIL 10, 2020: McKinsey Was Given A $1,704,000 Contract By HHS For “COVID-19 Central Coordination Support Services.” [USASpending.gov]

APRIL 28, 2020: McKinsey Was Given A $4,985,983 Contract By HHS To Help “Implement, Manage, And Monitor” The Provider Relief Funds From The Cares Act.  [USASpending.gov]

MARCH 20, 2020: McKinsey Was Given A $4,975,000 From Department Of Veterans Affairs For “COVID-19 Consulting And Modeling.” [USASpending.gov]

Boston Consulting Group Has Received $8 Million In Federal Contracts Since March 24th For COVID-19 Response Activities

APRIL 1, 2020:  Boston Consulting Group Received A $1,111,949 From HHS For Assisting “With The Required Analytic Support To Inform Decision Making About Where And How To Provide Assistance.” [USASpending.gov]

APRIL 1, 2020: Boston Consulting Group Received A $1,573,922 From HHS To “Accelerate And Scale Their Ability To Effectively Deliver Complex Cross-Agency And Cross-Government Programs, Most Immediately, The Response To COVID-19. [USASpending.gov]

MARCH 25, 2020: Boston Consulting Group Received A $502,916 From HHS For “Activist Program Management And Analytic Support Initial Call—4 Weeks.” [USASpending.gov]

MARCH 24, 2020: Boston Consulting Group Received A $4,852,876.00 From HHS For “Mission Essential Function Risk Based Scenario Planning Exercise.”  [USASpending.gov]

2. Why was Big Pharma lobbyist John Clerici given special access to senior HHS officials and permitted to influence federal COVID-19 response decisions?

Former BARDA Director Alleged In Whistleblower Complaint That Kadlec Repeatedly Pressured Him For Years To Fund Scientifically Dubious Projects Connected To Personal Friends. “The explosive 89-page complaint also contains a number of highly detailed accusations of nepotism surrounding Dr. Bob Kadlec, the assistant secretary for preparedness and response at HHS. The complaint alleges Kadlec repeatedly pressured Bright over the course of a number of years to fund scientifically dubious projects connected to personal friends.” [STAT News, 5/5/20]

Former BARDA Director Alleged Biotech Companies Aeolus, Alvogen, Partner Therapeutics And Ridgeback Therapeutics Were Given Special Access To Kadlec Via Tiber Creek Industry Consultant. “The complaint alleges that a small circle of biotech companies, including Aeolus Pharmaceuticals, Alvogen, Partner Therapeutics, and Ridgeback Therapeutics got special access to Kadlec through an industry consultant at Tiber Creek Partners. The complaint also alleges that Bright was made aware that Aeolus, in particular, has connections to Jared Kushner, the president’s son-in-law.” [STAT News, 5/5/20]

3. How did the administration ensure the ‘volunteers’ complied with proper protocols and laws?

According to a Whistleblower complaint, ‘volunteers’ used personal email for their official work. “According to the whistle-blower, they were given little initial instruction. They used personal Gmail accounts, prompting suspicion from some prospective suppliers and brokers who questioned their bona fides. A few days after they began, a government lawyer belatedly showed up with nondisclosure forms from the Department of Homeland Security.” [New York Times, 5/5/20]

4. Who were these volunteers, their employers and clients? What steps were taken to avoid conflicts of interest?

To date, there have been no public disclosures of who Kushner and the White House brought on to assist with this project. Moreover, there is no indication that any steps were taken to avoid conflicts of interest with these volunteers, their financial holdings, employers or clients.

5. Were McKinsey And Boston Consulting Group contracts purposefully structured so they wouldn't be subject to federal rule requiring them to report credible evidence of criminal or civil violations to the Office of the Inspector General?

Federal contracts over $5 million are subject to a rule that requires contractors to be diligent in the prevention and detection of criminal conduct and to disclose credible evidence of any criminal or civil violations to the Office of the Inspector General.

  • FAR 52.203-13 Is A Rule Established In 2008 Affecting Compliance And Internal Controls For Government Contractors That Applies To Contracts Exceeding $5 Million And 120 Days. “ [DCAA Consulting]
  • DCAA Consulting: FAR 52.203-13 Requires That Contractors “Be Diligent In The Prevention And Detection Of Criminal Conduct” And Requires Them “To Disclose In Writing To The Office Of The Inspector General Incidents Where There Is Credible Evidence That A Violation has Occurred Of Criminal Law Or The Civil False Claims Act.” [DCAA Consulting]

McKinsey and BCG’s largest federal contracts on COVID-19 all happen to fall just slightly under the threshold for them to be subject to the criminal and civil violation reporting rule.

  • APRIL 28, 2020: McKinsey Was Given A $4,985,983 Contract By HHS To Help “Implement, Manage, And Monitor” The Provider Relief Funds From The Cares Act.  [gov]
  • MARCH 20, 2020: McKinsey Was Given A $4,975,000 From Department Of Veterans Affairs For “COVID-19 Consulting And Modeling.” [gov]
  • MARCH 24, 2020: Boston Consulting Group Received A $4,852,876.00 From HHS For “Mission Essential Function Risk Based Scenario Planning Exercise.” [gov]

6. Who was considered a VIP? How were these VIPs identified?

Volunteers were told to prioritize and fast-track protective equipment leads from political allies and those close to President Trump. “Many of the volunteers were told to prioritize tips from political allies and associates of President Trump, tracked on a spreadsheet called “V.I.P. Update,” according to documents and emails obtained by The New York Times. Among them were leads from Republican members of Congress, the Trump youth activist Charlie Kirk and a former “Apprentice” contestant who serves as the campaign chair of Women for Trump.” [New York Times, 5/5/20]


Accountable.US is a nonpartisan watchdog group that exposes corruption across all levels of government.

The post Coronavirus Response: Six Questions About Kushner’s Failed Efforts appeared first on .

Read More

Continue Reading

Government

Low Iron Levels In Blood Could Trigger Long COVID: Study

Low Iron Levels In Blood Could Trigger Long COVID: Study

Authored by Amie Dahnke via The Epoch Times (emphasis ours),

People with inadequate…

Published

on

Low Iron Levels In Blood Could Trigger Long COVID: Study

Authored by Amie Dahnke via The Epoch Times (emphasis ours),

People with inadequate iron levels in their blood due to a COVID-19 infection could be at greater risk of long COVID.

(Shutterstock)

A new study indicates that problems with iron levels in the bloodstream likely trigger chronic inflammation and other conditions associated with the post-COVID phenomenon. The findings, published on March 1 in Nature Immunology, could offer new ways to treat or prevent the condition.

Long COVID Patients Have Low Iron Levels

Researchers at the University of Cambridge pinpointed low iron as a potential link to long-COVID symptoms thanks to a study they initiated shortly after the start of the pandemic. They recruited people who tested positive for the virus to provide blood samples for analysis over a year, which allowed the researchers to look for post-infection changes in the blood. The researchers looked at 214 samples and found that 45 percent of patients reported symptoms of long COVID that lasted between three and 10 months.

In analyzing the blood samples, the research team noticed that people experiencing long COVID had low iron levels, contributing to anemia and low red blood cell production, just two weeks after they were diagnosed with COVID-19. This was true for patients regardless of age, sex, or the initial severity of their infection.

According to one of the study co-authors, the removal of iron from the bloodstream is a natural process and defense mechanism of the body.

But it can jeopardize a person’s recovery.

When the body has an infection, it responds by removing iron from the bloodstream. This protects us from potentially lethal bacteria that capture the iron in the bloodstream and grow rapidly. It’s an evolutionary response that redistributes iron in the body, and the blood plasma becomes an iron desert,” University of Oxford professor Hal Drakesmith said in a press release. “However, if this goes on for a long time, there is less iron for red blood cells, so oxygen is transported less efficiently affecting metabolism and energy production, and for white blood cells, which need iron to work properly. The protective mechanism ends up becoming a problem.”

The research team believes that consistently low iron levels could explain why individuals with long COVID continue to experience fatigue and difficulty exercising. As such, the researchers suggested iron supplementation to help regulate and prevent the often debilitating symptoms associated with long COVID.

It isn’t necessarily the case that individuals don’t have enough iron in their body, it’s just that it’s trapped in the wrong place,” Aimee Hanson, a postdoctoral researcher at the University of Cambridge who worked on the study, said in the press release. “What we need is a way to remobilize the iron and pull it back into the bloodstream, where it becomes more useful to the red blood cells.”

The research team pointed out that iron supplementation isn’t always straightforward. Achieving the right level of iron varies from person to person. Too much iron can cause stomach issues, ranging from constipation, nausea, and abdominal pain to gastritis and gastric lesions.

1 in 5 Still Affected by Long COVID

COVID-19 has affected nearly 40 percent of Americans, with one in five of those still suffering from symptoms of long COVID, according to the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Long COVID is marked by health issues that continue at least four weeks after an individual was initially diagnosed with COVID-19. Symptoms can last for days, weeks, months, or years and may include fatigue, cough or chest pain, headache, brain fog, depression or anxiety, digestive issues, and joint or muscle pain.

Tyler Durden Sat, 03/09/2024 - 12:50

Read More

Continue Reading

Government

Walmart joins Costco in sharing key pricing news

The massive retailers have both shared information that some retailers keep very close to the vest.

Published

on

As we head toward a presidential election, the presumed candidates for both parties will look for issues that rally undecided voters. 

The economy will be a key issue, with Democrats pointing to job creation and lowering prices while Republicans will cite the layoffs at Big Tech companies, high housing prices, and of course, sticky inflation.

The covid pandemic created a perfect storm for inflation and higher prices. It became harder to get many items because people getting sick slowed down, or even stopped, production at some factories.

Related: Popular mall retailer shuts down abruptly after bankruptcy filing

It was also a period where demand increased while shipping, trucking and delivery systems were all strained or thrown out of whack. The combination led to product shortages and higher prices.

You might have gone to the grocery store and not been able to buy your favorite paper towel brand or find toilet paper at all. That happened partly because of the supply chain and partly due to increased demand, but at the end of the day, it led to higher prices, which some consumers blamed on President Joe Biden's administration.

Biden, of course, was blamed for the price increases, but as inflation has dropped and grocery prices have fallen, few companies have been up front about it. That's probably not a political choice in most cases. Instead, some companies have chosen to lower prices more slowly than they raised them.

However, two major retailers, Walmart (WMT) and Costco, have been very honest about inflation. Walmart Chief Executive Doug McMillon's most recent comments validate what Biden's administration has been saying about the state of the economy. And they contrast with the economic picture being painted by Republicans who support their presumptive nominee, Donald Trump.

Walmart has seen inflation drop in many key areas.

Image source: Joe Raedle/Getty Images

Walmart sees lower prices

McMillon does not talk about lower prices to make a political statement. He's communicating with customers and potential customers through the analysts who cover the company's quarterly-earnings calls.

During Walmart's fiscal-fourth-quarter-earnings call, McMillon was clear that prices are going down.

"I'm excited about the omnichannel net promoter score trends the team is driving. Across countries, we continue to see a customer that's resilient but looking for value. As always, we're working hard to deliver that for them, including through our rollbacks on food pricing in Walmart U.S. Those were up significantly in Q4 versus last year, following a big increase in Q3," he said.

He was specific about where the chain has seen prices go down.

"Our general merchandise prices are lower than a year ago and even two years ago in some categories, which means our customers are finding value in areas like apparel and hard lines," he said. "In food, prices are lower than a year ago in places like eggs, apples, and deli snacks, but higher in other places like asparagus and blackberries."

McMillon said that in other areas prices were still up but have been falling.

"Dry grocery and consumables categories like paper goods and cleaning supplies are up mid-single digits versus last year and high teens versus two years ago. Private-brand penetration is up in many of the countries where we operate, including the United States," he said.

Costco sees almost no inflation impact

McMillon avoided the word inflation in his comments. Costco  (COST)  Chief Financial Officer Richard Galanti, who steps down on March 15, has been very transparent on the topic.

The CFO commented on inflation during his company's fiscal-first-quarter-earnings call.

"Most recently, in the last fourth-quarter discussion, we had estimated that year-over-year inflation was in the 1% to 2% range. Our estimate for the quarter just ended, that inflation was in the 0% to 1% range," he said.

Galanti made clear that inflation (and even deflation) varied by category.

"A bigger deflation in some big and bulky items like furniture sets due to lower freight costs year over year, as well as on things like domestics, bulky lower-priced items, again, where the freight cost is significant. Some deflationary items were as much as 20% to 30% and, again, mostly freight-related," he added.

Read More

Continue Reading

Government

Walmart has really good news for shoppers (and Joe Biden)

The giant retailer joins Costco in making a statement that has political overtones, even if that’s not the intent.

Published

on

As we head toward a presidential election, the presumed candidates for both parties will look for issues that rally undecided voters. 

The economy will be a key issue, with Democrats pointing to job creation and lowering prices while Republicans will cite the layoffs at Big Tech companies, high housing prices, and of course, sticky inflation.

The covid pandemic created a perfect storm for inflation and higher prices. It became harder to get many items because people getting sick slowed down, or even stopped, production at some factories.

Related: Popular mall retailer shuts down abruptly after bankruptcy filing

It was also a period where demand increased while shipping, trucking and delivery systems were all strained or thrown out of whack. The combination led to product shortages and higher prices.

You might have gone to the grocery store and not been able to buy your favorite paper towel brand or find toilet paper at all. That happened partly because of the supply chain and partly due to increased demand, but at the end of the day, it led to higher prices, which some consumers blamed on President Joe Biden's administration.

Biden, of course, was blamed for the price increases, but as inflation has dropped and grocery prices have fallen, few companies have been up front about it. That's probably not a political choice in most cases. Instead, some companies have chosen to lower prices more slowly than they raised them.

However, two major retailers, Walmart (WMT) and Costco, have been very honest about inflation. Walmart Chief Executive Doug McMillon's most recent comments validate what Biden's administration has been saying about the state of the economy. And they contrast with the economic picture being painted by Republicans who support their presumptive nominee, Donald Trump.

Walmart has seen inflation drop in many key areas.

Image source: Joe Raedle/Getty Images

Walmart sees lower prices

McMillon does not talk about lower prices to make a political statement. He's communicating with customers and potential customers through the analysts who cover the company's quarterly-earnings calls.

During Walmart's fiscal-fourth-quarter-earnings call, McMillon was clear that prices are going down.

"I'm excited about the omnichannel net promoter score trends the team is driving. Across countries, we continue to see a customer that's resilient but looking for value. As always, we're working hard to deliver that for them, including through our rollbacks on food pricing in Walmart U.S. Those were up significantly in Q4 versus last year, following a big increase in Q3," he said.

He was specific about where the chain has seen prices go down.

"Our general merchandise prices are lower than a year ago and even two years ago in some categories, which means our customers are finding value in areas like apparel and hard lines," he said. "In food, prices are lower than a year ago in places like eggs, apples, and deli snacks, but higher in other places like asparagus and blackberries."

McMillon said that in other areas prices were still up but have been falling.

"Dry grocery and consumables categories like paper goods and cleaning supplies are up mid-single digits versus last year and high teens versus two years ago. Private-brand penetration is up in many of the countries where we operate, including the United States," he said.

Costco sees almost no inflation impact

McMillon avoided the word inflation in his comments. Costco  (COST)  Chief Financial Officer Richard Galanti, who steps down on March 15, has been very transparent on the topic.

The CFO commented on inflation during his company's fiscal-first-quarter-earnings call.

"Most recently, in the last fourth-quarter discussion, we had estimated that year-over-year inflation was in the 1% to 2% range. Our estimate for the quarter just ended, that inflation was in the 0% to 1% range," he said.

Galanti made clear that inflation (and even deflation) varied by category.

"A bigger deflation in some big and bulky items like furniture sets due to lower freight costs year over year, as well as on things like domestics, bulky lower-priced items, again, where the freight cost is significant. Some deflationary items were as much as 20% to 30% and, again, mostly freight-related," he added.

Read More

Continue Reading

Trending