Connect with us

Economics

An Investment Playbook for Thriving During The Next Market Crash

“Do you have faith the "new era" of Fed-managed markets can continue to levitate stocks well above historical norms?”   -Is A Stock Market Crash Like 2000 Possible?

Most investors have no idea that the most considerable risk to their portfolio…

Published

on

“Do you have faith the “new era” of Fed-managed markets can continue to levitate stocks well above historical norms?”   Is A Stock Market Crash Like 2000 Possible?

Most investors have no idea that the most considerable risk to their portfolio occurs if the Fed cannot continue to be a market magician. The next market crash will likely be the result of a Fed error. Do you have an investment playbook in case such an event unfolds?

In the article, we write: “Assuming the regression holds, and history has favorable odds of that occurring, we should expect the S&P 500 to fall to 2650 in the next two years.” That is the potential risk facing investors if the Fed fails to provide enough market liquidity.

If you worry about the Fed’s ability to keep stocks elevated and the next market crash, we revisit the investment playbook for surviving and thriving the tech bust of 2000. While times are certainly different today versus two decades ago, the analysis helps us consider an alternative investment plan in case the Fed can’t come to the market’s rescue when needed.

But first, what might cause the Fed to stop liquidity taps from flowing? 

The Fed Is Running Out of Excuses

Persistent inflation is the biggest risk facing investors. By this, we mean that persistently high inflation is increasingly likely to result in reduced Fed accommodation for the markets.

The Fed has two congressionally chartered mandates in which to manage monetary policy. The first is maximum employment, and the second is price stability. The labor markets are arguably back to full employment, as we discuss below. Prices are far from stable and in need of the Fed’s attention.

Labor Markets

In What a Rate Hike in 2022 Might Mean For “Stonks” we show the labor markets are at or near maximum employment. Consider the following quotes from the article:

  • The popular U3 Unemployment Rate, at 4.6%, is only 0.2% above the average of the five years preceding the pandemic.
  • The U6 rate is 0.4% below the average of the five years leading to the pandemic.
  • The graph below shows there are 1.7 jobs available for every person that lost a job during the pandemic.
  • The labor market is fully recovered for those willing and able to work. The Fed has met its mandate. 

Since writing the article, the U3 fell to 4.2%, and the U6 is now .9% below the last five years’ average.  

The only indicator showing weakness in the labor markets is the labor participation rate. We argue that lower participation is not necessarily a weakness. As we write in the article: “While difficult to quantify, when adjusted for voluntary actions, like those above, the participation rate is likely back to where it was before the pandemic.”

If it isn’t already, the labor market is close enough to full employment that it should no longer be an excuse to continue with QE and not raise rates.

Price Stability

The Fed informally updated its price stability policy over the last few years. The new inflation averaging regime will allow inflation to run higher than 2% for short periods to compensate for prior periods when it was below average.

The graph below shows the three-year average inflation rate is now 2.7%. Further, the annual inflation rate is 6.2%. The current inflation rate and longer-term average rate substantially exceed the Fed’s price stability target.

The Fed is grossly failing in its mandate for stable prices. In combination with full employment, the Fed is behind the eight ball, needing to taper quickly, raise rates, and importantly reduce liquidity. 

Jerome Powell is finally acknowledging the points above.   

On November 30th he stated: “At this point, the economy is very strong and inflationary pressures are higher, and it is therefore appropriate in my view to consider wrapping up the taper of our asset purchases, which we actually announced at the November meeting, perhaps a few months sooner,”

Do you have a game plan if the Fed aggressively reduces liquidity?  

The Tech Boom/Bust Playbook – Value versus Growth

For over the past 60 years, value stocks have tended to outperform growth stocks. We have written a series of articles detailing the history. We suggest reading The Future Promise of Value Versus the Allure of Growth. For background on the topic.

While decades of history claim value outperforms growth, the recent decade argues otherwise. The graph below charts the ten-year annualized compounded return of the top and bottom decile of stocks ranked by the ratio of earnings to price (E/P). E/P is the opposite of price to earnings. Therefore, a stock with a high E/P is considered a value stock and not a growth stock as P/E signals.

stock valuations earnings s&P

Since 1961, value has handily beat growth by 4.41% per year on average. However, as you likely notice, there are two periods such was not true, the mid-late 1990s and the last five years.

The following graph zooms in on the performance of growth and value in the years leading to the tech crash of 2000. The lowest decile of E/P stocks, growth stocks, outperformed value by 112% from 1998 to the tech crash in March 2000.

earnings tech bust S&P

While growth had a great run in the late 90s, value stocks were the place to hide during the tech crash. As we show below, growth stocks gave up a large chunk of the late 90s gains. Value stocks were flat over the period, holding onto their gains from the prior few years.

Tech bust 2000 s&P

Today

In Is A Stock Market Crash Like 2000 Possible? We write: Not only is today’s speculative environment eerily similar to the late 90s, but valuations, in many cases, are frothier than that period.”

Like in the 90s, value is being shunned for growth. The graph below shows the most expensive stocks have beat the cheapest stocks by nearly 50% since 2018.

earnings price S&P 500

The economic, political, and demographic environments today versus 20 years ago are different. Despite the differences, there are similarities in market behaviors. One such parallel is that value is suffering at the hands of growth stocks.

We think it’s likely that value stocks will significantly outperform growth stocks in the event of a sizeable drawdown. Timing the transition from growth to value will be difficult, but such a rotation will likely prove invaluable. You may want to keep the 2000 investment playbook handy.

SummaryInvestment Playbook

Leading to the tech bust, the narrative behind record valuations was grand expectations for a new internet era and outsized economic growth. Today, it is not the future enamoring investors but historically low interest rates and QE. It is the Fed’s actions exciting investors, not the potential of exceptional earnings.

The Fed is at the point it much combat inflation. To accomplish said task, they remove liquidity from the markets. How well they thread the needle by keeping asset prices stable and completing their task remains to be seen.

The Fed may find a way to keep equity valuations at sky-high levels even when removing liquidity. They may not, and in that case, we suggest you have an investment playbook ready to enact.

The post An Investment Playbook for Thriving During The Next Market Crash appeared first on RIA.

Read More

Continue Reading

Economics

How Inflation Impacts Penny Stocks and the Stock Market 

Use these tips for trading penny stocks with high inflation
The post How Inflation Impacts Penny Stocks and the Stock Market  appeared first on Penny…

Published

on

3 Ways That Inflation Impacts Investing in Penny Stocks

When it comes to trading penny stocks, investors need to know everything that is going on in the stock market. Inflation is a huge factor when it comes to penny stocks, especially in the past few months. When inflation rates are high, stocks become more expensive, and this can have a negative impact on the stock market. 

In order to make money with penny stocks, investors need to be aware of how inflation impacts the stock market so they can make the necessary adjustments to their investment. Now, while inflation is always a factor, over the last year or so, this has been dramatized due to the effects of the pandemic. And more recently, we have begun to see some positivity regarding inflation. 

[Read More] Best Penny Stocks To Buy? 4 EV Stocks To Watch Thanks To TSLA Stock

So, while we are in no way out of the woods yet, we have seen that inflation is the main contributor to market movement in the past couple of months. As a result, stocks have become more expensive, but we are seeing some relief from the inflation rates.

This is good news for investors, and it is something to keep an eye on in the coming months as we continue to see the effects of the pandemic play out. Considering all of this, let’s take a closer look at how inflation could continue to impact penny stocks moving forward.

3 Ways That Inflation Could Impact Penny Stocks

  1. Higher Volatility Than Usual
  2. Cheaper Penny Stocks to Buy
  3. Long Term Value

Higher Volatility Than Usual

We all know that volatility with penny stocks and blue chips has been higher than usual in the past few months. And, when we look at the reasons behind it, inflation is one of the key drivers.

What is inflation? It’s simply a sustained increase in the price level of goods and services in an economy. And while a little bit of inflation is actually good for stocks (it boosts company profits), too much inflation can lead to problems.

Why does inflation cause more volatility in stocks? Well, when inflation is higher than expected, it can lead to concerns about future economic growth. This can cause investors to sell stocks and move into investments that are perceived as being safer. This selling can lead to increased volatility in the stock market. In addition, we have movement due to panic selling and buying, which can exacerbate the problem.

[Read More] Best Penny Stocks to Buy As Inflation Drops, 3 to Watch 

So what can investors do to protect themselves from inflation-induced volatility? First, it’s important to keep a close eye on inflation data. If inflation is rising faster than expected, it may be time to take a closer look at your portfolio and make sure that you’re not too exposed to stocks.

Second, don’t forget that stocks are not the only investment option out there. There are plenty of other options, such as bonds and real estate, that can provide diversification and help protect your portfolio from inflation-induced volatility.

Cheaper Penny Stocks to Buy

When it comes to finding penny stocks to buy, inflation can lead to losses in the stock market. This means that many penny stocks can be bought up for less money, but they may not be worth as much when it comes to future earnings. Inflation can also make stocks harder to sell, since their prices are lower than what they were purchased for.

This can be frustrating for investors who are trying to make a profit in the stock market. Now, in the short term, these low values mean that stocks may be a good investment. However, over the long term, it is critical to see what happens with this value and whether or not it can be maintained. So, while finding cheap penny stocks to buy is more than doable, always remember the length of your investment goal.

Long Term Value

With many penny stocks trading at low prices, inflation can cause the stocks to go up in value over the long term. Inflation is often thought of as something that devalues money, and in a sense, it does. But inflation can also have a positive effect on stocks and other investments.

penny stocks value

For example, let’s say you buy a stock for $1 per share. Inflation rises, and the next year, the same stock is selling for $2 per share. The purchasing power of your dollar has decreased, but the value of your stocks has doubled. In this way, inflation can create long-term value in the stock market.

Of course, inflation is not the only factor that affects stocks. The overall performance of the stock market is also influenced by economic conditions, company earnings, and many other factors. However, over the long term, inflation can have a positive effect on penny stocks if you understand where that value is.

3 Penny Stocks to Watch This Coming Week

  1. Aquestive Therapeutics Inc. (NASDAQ: AQST)
  2. Edgio Inc. (NASDAQ: EGIO)
  3. Comstock Inc. (NYSE: LODE)

Which Penny Stocks Are You Watching Right Now?

If you’re looking for penny stocks to buy, there are hundreds to choose from. But how do you know which penny stocks are worth your investment? There are a few things to look for when considering penny stocks. The first thing to consider is what your trading strategy is and how to take advantage of penny stocks. 

[Read More] 5 Top Penny Stocks To Watch Today With High Short Interest

Are you looking for stocks that are undervalued and have the potential to make a quick profit? Or are you looking to hold onto stocks for the long haul? While it is not easy to trade penny stocks, it can be much simpler with the right information on hand. Considering that, which penny stocks are you watching right now?

If you enjoyed this article and you’re interested in learning how to trade so you can have the best chance to profit consistently then you need to checkout this YouTube channel. CLICK HERE RIGHT NOW!!

The post How Inflation Impacts Penny Stocks and the Stock Market  appeared first on Penny Stocks to Buy, Picks, News and Information | PennyStocks.com.

Read More

Continue Reading

Government

US: The New Real Hoaxes?

US: The New Real Hoaxes?

Authored by Pete Hoekstra via The Gatestone Institute,

The investigative reporting by these two organizations…

Published

on

US: The New Real Hoaxes?

Authored by Pete Hoekstra via The Gatestone Institute,

  • The investigative reporting by these two organizations [the New York Times and the Washington Post] was so thorough and groundbreaking it turned up things that were not even there.

  • For having refused to rescind these awards, the Pulitzer Committee should receive its own Pulitzer -- for fraud.

  • The real hoax appears to have been the CCP's ostensible good behavior and the now-hugely-discredited initial reporting on the virus.

  • Or how about the Hunter Biden laptop cover-up? Once again, On October 14, 2020, just weeks before the 2020 presidential election, a critical story of possible extensive influence-peddling with senior intelligence officers in the CCP, Russia and Ukraine by the son of a presidential candidate. The contents of the laptop raised questions that the candidate at the time, Vice President Joe Biden, could be compromised. The entire subject was decisively pushed aside, along with the potential threat to national security that such an eventuality might entail.

  • Also not allowed during the January 6th hearings have been any witnesses for the defense, any cross-examination, or any exculpatory evidence.

  • One wonders, for instance if the January 6th Committee will consider the July 29, 2022 tweet by General Keith Kellogg, that on January 3, 2021, Trump, in front of witnesses, did indeed ask for "troops needed" for January 6. Kellogg wrote: "I was in the room."

  • The January 6th Committee has also not released any information about government informants or FBI undercover law enforcement officers who might have been in the crowd, and Pelosi is also said to be blocking access to a massive quantity of documents. Finally, according to attorney Mark Levin, under the Constitution's separation of powers, Congress, has no legitimacy even to hold a criminal investigation: that power belongs to the Judiciary. The entire proceeding is illegitimate and a usurpation of power.

  • Is it surprising that after the Pulitzer decision, the Russia collusion hoax, the Whitmer kidnapping hoax, the Covid origin hoax, the Hunter Biden laptop hoax, and now the January 6th Committee hoax, that many Americans believe there is something wrong with the system?

Recently former US President Donald Trump challenged the award of Pulitzer Prizes to the New York Times and the Washington Post for their investigative reporting on alleged collusion between the 2016 Trump campaign and Russia.

The investigative reporting by these two organizations was so thorough and groundbreaking it turned up things that were not even there.

You have to hand it to them for this so-called "great reporting": the Pulitzer Committee sure did.

We now know, of course, the grand conspiracy pushed by these papers is nothing more than thoroughly debunked disinformation. For having refused to rescind these awards, the Pulitzer Committee should receive its own Pulitzer -- for fraud.

The intractability of the Pulitzer Committee is only the latest example of why so many Americans have been losing trust in their institutions, both public and private. Rather than admitting that these awards were a mistake, and that much of the reporting was not investigative reporting, but merely a recitation of fabrications put forward by political hacks for campaign purposes, the Pulitzer Committee announced that it will stand by its initial decision, facts be dammed.

The Russia hoax is emblematic of the model built by the anti-Trump, anti-America First, anti-populist movement that the American people have experienced for the last six years. It embodies many of the characteristics that have frustrated Americans. It is a combination of influential forces -- media, social media, political players, and government -- that put forward information detrimental to one -- oddly always the same -- political viewpoint. In this instance, populists -- believers in the rights, wisdom or virtues of the common people, according to Merriam Webster -- who might embrace the concept of personal freedom espoused by the Constitution, a free market economy, economic growth, energy independence, school choice, equal application of the law and decentralized governance.

Much of the material used to foster the Russia hoax originated from the discredited "Steele Dossier," pedaled by former British spy Christopher Steele, funded by Clinton-linked opposition research firm FusionGPS, and pushed by Clinton campaign lawyer Michael Sussman. This discredited information was shared widely -- and often, it seems, with prior knowledge of its falseness -- through the mainstream media and social media when it was leaked to the press early in 2017 just before Donald Trump was sworn in as president. The material contributed to the launching of the Mueller "Russiagate" investigation, which cast a shadow over the first two years of the Trump administration. Government officials were involved as CIA Director John BrennanFBI Director James Comey and DNI James Clapper all lent their credibility to the supposed authenticity or seriousness of the Russian materials. All of this did tremendous damage to the effectiveness of the Trump administration, as it sought to govern, by putting it under a cloud of suspicion and illegitimacy from the outset.

This, however, was not the only example. Consider the disrupted kidnapping plot against Michigan Governor Gretchen Whitmer in her key swing state for presidential elections. "The FBI got walloped [in April]", according to the New York Post, " when a Michigan jury concluded that the bureau had entrapped two men accused of plotting to kidnap Gov. Gretchen Whitmer. Those men and others were arrested a few weeks before the 2020 election in a high-profile, FBI-fabricated case...."

The media, however, for the most part portrayed the kidnapping plot as the work of domestic terrorists, with the implied inference being they were right-wing Trump supporters. Whitmer went so far as to accuse Trump of being complicit in the plan, even though it emerged that these alleged plotters had also supposedly wanted to hang Trump. The FBI, it was later shown, had been heavily involved in the plot through informants and individuals it had placed in the group. By the time the case came to trial after the election, Biden had won Michigan's electoral votes and the damage had been done.

Consider, also, the COVID pandemic. The "facts" at the time were supposedly that it came from "nature" and that the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) government had supposedly known nothing about its human-to-human transmissibility, even though it had "made whistleblowers disappear and refused to hand over virus samples so the West could make a vaccine."

The CCP, early on, was portrayed as a constructive player in controlling the spread of the virus, even as it was recalling and hoarding all of its Personal Protective Equipment (PPE). This fiction was reinforced by Dr. Anthony Fauci, the World Health Organization, and other prominent participants – apart from Taiwan, which futilely tried to warn the WHO of the coronavirus's fierce human-to-human transmissibility, only to be dismissed.

The mainstream media and social media also quickly began parroting the "official" story line. Social media companies suspended the accounts of whoever might have had a different opinion and some were even canceled.

For the 10 months leading up to the November 2020 election, the narrative was set: COVID-19 was a naturally occurring virus and the CCP was in the clear. Imagine how different the 2020 presidential election might have been if the debate was how the world would have held the CCP accountable for the leak and coverup of COVID from the Wuhan Institute of Virology. Now in 2022, a lab-leak is considered the most "likely cause" of the coronavirus, but again the political damage, and a gigantic amount of non-political damage, has already been done. The real hoax appears to have been the CCP's ostensible good behavior and the now-hugely-discredited initial reporting on the virus.

Or how about the Hunter Biden laptop cover-up? Once again, On October 14, 2020, just weeks before the 2020 presidential election, a critical story of possible extensive influence-peddling with senior intelligence officers in the CCP, Russia and Ukraine by the son of a presidential candidate. The contents of the laptop raised questions that the candidate at the time, Vice President Joe Biden, could be compromised. The entire subject was decisively pushed aside, along with the potential threat to national security that such an eventuality might entail.

Discussion of Hunter Biden's laptop with its reportedly incriminating information about the Biden family business dealings with the CCPRussia, and other actors in what appeared to be a model of pay-for-play, was instantly shut down. Fifty-one former government intelligence officials , who we now know were perfectly well aware that the laptop was real – the FBI had been holding it for months -- wrote a letter describing the contents of the laptop as having "all the classic earmarks of a Russian information operation" designed to damage Joe Biden.

NPR famously downplayed the story, and once again, if you used social media to post information originally reported by the New York Post, you were canceled.

A year and a half after the election, the facts were finally "officially" accepted: Well, what do you know, it really was Hunter Biden's laptop and the material on it "is real!"

Once again, the leadership at the FBI, the media, social media, and former government officials had developed a hoax to damage their political opposition and the people who supported it.

Finally, there is the January 6th Committee, a one-sided investigative body, sometimes called "the third (attempted) impeachment." The Committee appears to have been put in place to stop Trump from running for office again. Before the proceeding even began, its outcome was predetermined: Trump was to be found guilty of -- something. As Stalin secret police chief, Lavrentiy Beria used to say during Soviet Russia's reign of terror, "Find me the man and I'll find you the crime." So the US show trial commenced.

Even its start was ominous. House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, in an unprecedented move, vetoed the committee appointments of Representatives Jim Banks and Jim Jordan. This rebuff led House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy to pull his five Republican candidates from participating. Pelosi, it appeared, wanted only anti-Trump folks to serve on the Committee. Also not allowed during the January 6 hearings have been any witnesses for the defense, any cross-examination, or any exculpatory evidence.

One wonders, for instance if the January 6th Committee will consider the July 29, 2022 tweet by General Keith Kellogg, that on January 3, 2021, Trump, in front of witnesses, did indeed ask for "troops needed" for January 6. Kellogg wrote:, "I was in the room:"

"Great OpEd. Reinforces my earlier comment on 6 Jan Cmte. Has quote from DOD IG Report regarding 3 Jan 2021 meeting with Actg Def Secy Miller/CJCS Milley in the Oval on the 6 Jan NG request by POTUS on troops needed. I was in the room."

While purportedly examining in detail every decision and action by Trump and his team, the Committee refuses to question Pelosi, among the leading figures responsible for the security of the Capitol. She reportedly "turned down" requests for greater security. According to the Federalist:

"Four days after the riot, former Capitol Police Chief Steven Sund, who resigned his post in the aftermath, told The Washington Post his request for pre-emptive reinforcement from the National Guard ahead of Jan. 6 was turned down. Sund said House Sergeant at Arms Paul Irving, overseen by Pelosi, thought the guard's deployment was bad "optics" two days before the raid.... Despite the Associated Press and Washington Post's best efforts to run interference for the speaker, suddenly exonerating her of duties overseeing Capitol security, the riot on Jan. 6 was a security failure Pelosi owns. If the "speaker trusts security professionals to make security decisions," then why, as the police breach unfolded, did Irving feel compelled to seek the speaker's approval to dispatch the National Guard, as The New York Times reported? How could Pelosi also order the extended shut down of the Capitol to visitors, citing coronavirus, and install metal detectors in the House chamber?"

The Committee has not evaluated the performance of the Capitol Police or other law enforcement agencies, but it has targeted the "private records of individuals with no connection to the violence."

The January 6th Committee has also not released any information about government informants or FBI undercover law enforcement officers who might have been in the crowd, and Pelosi is also said to be blocking access to a massive quantity of documents. Finally, according to attorney Mark Levin, under the Constitution's separation of powers, Congress, has no legitimacy even to hold a criminal investigation: that power belongs to the Judiciary. The entire proceeding is illegitimate and a usurpation of power. The Committee's narrative is clear: Donald Trump is responsible for the events of January 6, now let us manufacture the evidence to prove it.

This article has not even delved into the 28 states that "changed voting rules to boost mail-in ballots." Some States apparently omitted both state law and the need for states' legislatures to be the sole arbiters of election law, as required by the Constitution; the $400 million spent by Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg; the 2000-plus "mules" and the algorithms that sent conservative emails to spam while emails with liberal content went through to the addressees.

Is it any wonder that many Americans have lost faith in their institutions and leaders? Is it surprising that after the Pulitzer decision, the Russia collusion hoax, the Whitmer kidnapping hoax, the Covid origin hoax, the Hunter Biden laptop hoax, and now the January 6th Committee hoax, that many Americans believe there is something wrong with the system? The media, social media, government officials and others have been complicit in undermining our rule of law and possibly even subverting an election.

*  *  *

Peter Hoekstra was US Ambassador to the Netherlands during the Trump administration. He served 18 years in the U.S. House of Representatives representing the second district of Michigan and served as Chairman and Ranking member of the House Intelligence Committee. He is currently Chairman of the Center for Security Policy Board of Advisors and a Distinguished Senior Fellow at Gatestone Institute.

Tyler Durden Fri, 08/12/2022 - 23:55

Read More

Continue Reading

Economics

LFST INVESTOR NOTICE: Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP Files Class Action Lawsuit Against LifeStance Health Group, Inc. and Announces Opportunity for Investors with Substantial Losses to Lead Case

LFST INVESTOR NOTICE: Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP Files Class Action Lawsuit Against LifeStance Health Group, Inc. and Announces Opportunity for Investors with Substantial Losses to Lead Case
PR Newswire
SAN DIEGO, Aug. 12, 2022

SAN DIEGO,…

Published

on

LFST INVESTOR NOTICE: Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP Files Class Action Lawsuit Against LifeStance Health Group, Inc. and Announces Opportunity for Investors with Substantial Losses to Lead Case

PR Newswire

SAN DIEGO, Aug. 12, 2022 /PRNewswire/ -- The law firm of Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP announces that it has filed a class action lawsuit seeking to represent purchasers of LifeStance Health Group, Inc. (NASDAQ: LFST) common stock issued in connection with LifeStance Health's June 10, 2021 initial public stock offering (the "IPO"). Captioned Nayani v. LifeStance Health Group, Inc., No. 22-cv-06833 (S.D.N.Y.) – the LifeStance Health class action lawsuit charges LifeStance Health, certain of its top executives and directors, as well as the IPO's underwriters with violations of the Securities Act of 1933. 

If you suffered substantial losses and wish to serve as lead plaintiff, please provide your information here:

https://www.rgrdlaw.com/cases-lifestance-health-group-inc-class-action-lawsuit-lfst.html 

You can also contact attorney J.C. Sanchez of Robbins Geller by calling 800/449-4900 or via e-mail at jsanchez@rgrdlaw.com. Lead plaintiff motions for the LifeStance Health class action lawsuit must be filed with the court no later than October 11, 2022.

CASE ALLEGATIONS: LifeStance Health is one of the nation's largest providers of virtual and in-person outpatient mental health care. LifeStance Health benefitted from the state and local lockdown orders necessitated by the COVID-19 pandemic starting in the spring of 2020. But by December 2020, several COVID-19 vaccines were being approved and administered, meaning LifeStance Health's access to clients seeking virtual mental health services would significantly decline while demand for in-person services would increase. LifeStance Health conducted its IPO on June 10, 2021, selling 46 million shares at $18.00 per share, raising $828 million in gross proceeds.

However, as the LifeStance Health class action lawsuit alleges, the IPO's registration statement failed to disclose the following material facts: (i) that the number of virtual visits clients were undertaking utilizing LifeStance Health was decreasing as the COVID-19 lockdowns were being lifted, thereby flatlining LifeStance Health's out-patient/virtual revenue growth; (ii) that the percentage of in-person visits clients were undertaking utilizing LifeStance Health was increasing as the COVID-19 lockdowns were being lifted, thereby causing LifeStance Health's operating expenses to increase substantially; (iii) that LifeStance Health had lost a large number of physicians due to burn-out and, as a result, its physician retention rate had fallen significantly below the 87% highlighted in the IPO's registration statement and LifeStance Health had been expending additional costs to onboard new physicians who were less productive than the outgoing physicians they were replacing; and (iv) as a result, LifeStance Health's business metrics and financial prospects were not as strong as the IPO's registration statement represented.

At the time of the LifeStance Health class action lawsuit's filing, LifeStance Health common stock traded in a range of $4.77-$7.70, a reduction of upwards of 73% from the price the shares were sold at in the IPO.

The plaintiff is represented by Robbins Geller, which has extensive experience in prosecuting investor class actions including actions involving financial fraud.  You can view a copy of the complaint by clicking here.

THE LEAD PLAINTIFF PROCESS: The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 permits any investor who purchased LifeStance Health common stock issued in connection with the IPO to seek appointment as lead plaintiff in the LifeStance Health class action lawsuit. A lead plaintiff is generally the movant with the greatest financial interest in the relief sought by the putative class who is also typical and adequate of the putative class. A lead plaintiff acts on behalf of all other class members in directing the LifeStance Health class action lawsuit. The lead plaintiff can select a law firm of its choice to litigate the LifeStance Health class action lawsuit.  An investor's ability to share in any potential future recovery of the LifeStance Health class action lawsuit is not dependent upon serving as lead plaintiff. 

ABOUT ROBBINS GELLER: Robbins Geller is one of the world's leading complex class action firms representing plaintiffs in securities fraud cases. The Firm is ranked #1 on the 2021 ISS Securities Class Action Services Top 50 Report for recovering nearly $2 billion for investors last year alone – more than triple the amount recovered by any other plaintiffs' firm. With 200 lawyers in 9 offices, Robbins Geller is one of the largest plaintiffs' firms in the world, and the Firm's attorneys have obtained many of the largest securities class action recoveries in history, including the largest securities class action recovery ever – $7.2 billion – in In re Enron Corp. Sec. Litig. Please visit the following page for more information:

https://www.rgrdlaw.com/services-litigation-securities-fraud.html

Attorney advertising. 
Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. 
Services may be performed by attorneys in any of our offices. 

Contact:



Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP 


655 W. Broadway, Suite 1900, San Diego, CA  92101 


J.C. Sanchez, 800-449-4900 


jsanchez@rgrdlaw.com 

View original content to download multimedia:https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/lfst-investor-notice-robbins-geller-rudman--dowd-llp-files-class-action-lawsuit-against-lifestance-health-group-inc-and-announces-opportunity-for-investors-with-substantial-losses-to-lead-case-301605195.html

SOURCE Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP

Read More

Continue Reading

Trending