Connect with us

International

With Cushing Hitting “Tank Bottoms” Goldman Hikes Oil Price Target To $100

With Cushing Hitting "Tank Bottoms" Goldman Hikes Oil Price Target To $100

After tagging $96 yesterday, Brent’s torrid rally hit the pause…

Published

on

With Cushing Hitting "Tank Bottoms" Goldman Hikes Oil Price Target To $100

After tagging $96 yesterday, Brent’s torrid rally hit the pause button overnight, which - as Bloomberg's Jake Lloyd-Smith writes - makes sense given the extremely stretched RSIs and pre-FOMC caution. Still, the next signal of the fast-tightening physical market may be just around the corner, potentially buttressing the case that any reversal in crude prices will be temporary (a topic we first touched upon yesterday in "Strong Tailwinds Could See Oil Become Even More Overbought").

As a reminder, Wednesday brings the DOE's weekly stockpile breakdown, a key window into what’s happening in tank farms across the world’s largest economy. Well, as we noted last night, the latest API estimates suggested that there will be a further drawdown in nationwide crude holdings, including a drop at the vital storage hub in Cushing, Oklahoma.

This matters because as Lloyd-Smith notes, crude inventories at that site have collapsed by 42% so far this quarter, putting them on pace for a record decline! They were last down to about 25 million barrels after falling in 10 of the past 11 weeks...

... and a couple more draws could revive talk of so-called "tank bottoms", or the effective minimum, as they always need to hold some oil for operational reasons (just like the salt caverns that make up the US SPR). According to Bloomberg's veteran market watcher Javier Blas, “traders talk about tank bottoms when Cushing inventories drop toward the 20-to-25m barrel range.”

It's not all smooth sailing for oil, however. In addition to the previously discussed potential drop in Chinese demand, which recently hit a 2023 high)...

... overnight Goldman - which after repeatedly slashing its oil price target for much of the past two quarters (despite having turned commodity supercycle two years ago, a flip that probably cost Jeff Currie his job) after being wrong in expecting oil to soar in the first half  - realized that it is once again badly behind the curve after oil's 30% rally in the past three months, and the bank's commodity strategists hiked the12-month Brent price target from $93 to $100, rejoining the triple digit club as worldwide demand hits unprecedented levels and OPEC+ supply curbs continue to tighten the market.

Of course, any time Goldman turns bullish, prices of the referenced asset mysteriously tumble, although in this particular case the fundamentals may be just too powerful to fade Goldman.

According to Goldman, the key reason for the hike is that significantly lower OPEC supply and higher demand more than offset significantly higher US supply, largely verbatim what we said two weeks ago in "Oil To Hit $107 As Deficit Approaches 3 Million Barrels Per Day."

As GS commodity strategist Daan Struyven writes, "overall, we believe that OPEC will be able to sustain Brent in an $80-$105 range in 2024 by leveraging robust Asia-centric global demand growth (1.8mb/d) and by exercising its pricing power assertively."

Extending our oil deficit analysis from two weeks ago, the bank then predicts that the market will have a deficit estimated at 2 million barrels a day this quarter, followed by a shortfall of 1.1 million barrels a day in the final three months of 2023..

... thanks to record global consumption.

Yet at the same time as it is turned bullish (again), Goldman appears to have learned from its recent mistakes and is no longer projecting oil "mooning" but instead believes that "most of the rally is behind us, and that Brent is unlikely to sustainably exceed $105/bbl next year" which of course is the best possible outcome in a world which is already sliding into stagflation. Goldman lists the following 3 factors for why it expects oil to remain rangebound between $80 and $105:

  • First, while US supply is more capital disciplined than a decade ago, the upward trend in capex and supply beats over the past three years, and the recent inflection in rigs confirms its dynamism.
  • Second, high spare capacity and the return to growth in offshore projects limit the upside to long-dated oil prices.
  • Third, OPEC is unlikely to push prices to extreme levels, which would destroy its long-term residual demand.

Below we excerpt some more details from the report (full note available to pro subscribers in the usual place).

We now assume Saudi Arabia unwinds the extra 1mb/d cut gradually starting in 2024Q2, but that the 1.7mb/d cut with 8 other OPEC+ countries remains fully in place next year. The 900kb/d downgrade to our 2024 average OPEC supply forecast reflects three factors. First, Saudi Arabia appears determined to lower inventories. Second, keeping the group cut would likely support Saudi oil revenues in 2024. Third, recent US supply beats on easing supply constraints and efficiency gains lower the call on OPEC.

We believe that most of the rally is behind us, and that Brent is unlikely to sustainably exceed $105/bbl next year. First, while US supply is more capital disciplined than a decade ago, the upward trend in capex and supply beats over the past three years, and the recent inflection in rigs confirms its dynamism. Second, high spare capacity and the return to growth in offshore projects limit the upside to long-dated oil prices. Third, OPEC is unlikely to push prices to extreme levels, which would destroy its long-term residual demand.

We also believe that Brent is unlikely to sustainably drop below $80/bbl next year because of the strong OPEC put. Moreover, Western energy policy now has less room left to fight high prices given declines in the SPR and in Iran spare capacity. Third, we remain on track for a soft landing despite the oil rally.

Fast-forwarding to Goldman's trade reco, the bank writes that "based on our constructive outlook for oil prices and bearish view on volatility, we conclude by taking profit on two trade recommendations, and launching a new restructured trade."

We have previously recommended clients position for higher Brent prices and lower volatility via long call spreads and being short a strangle. While this trade had performed well, we now believe that further declines in OECD stocks are needed before OPEC barrels are brought back to market, and we now view OPEC to be optimizing for higher prices than before. As such, we take profit on our original recommendation, closing the trade at $0.65/bbl, for $0.67/bbl profit.

However, we now restructure the trade for a higher range. We now recommend clients go long a $90-95/bbl Brent call spread and short a $80/$100 Brent strangle on the Jun-24 contracts. This strategy raises c.$6/bbl upfront, with a max payoff of $15/bbl, and stands to profit if the contract expires in a $75-110/bbl range. It sells volatility on net to benefit from the recent increase in implied volatility, and exploits the backwardation and contango at the front of the Brent futures curve and Brent volatility surface, respectively. Ample spare capacity and loosening constraints to US shale should both act to bring breakevens back towards their pre-pandemic range, in our view.

Meanwhile, we hold onto our Long Dec-24 Brent trading recommendation (initiated Sep-22; current profit $11.62/bbl) as we still see upside to current forwards. However, we take profit on our short $60/bbl Dec-24 Brent put trade (initiated Dec-22; current profit $5.10/bbl), given limited potential for further gains.

More in the full note available to pro subs.

Tyler Durden Wed, 09/20/2023 - 10:16

Read More

Continue Reading

International

Fighting the Surveillance State Begins with the Individual

It’s a well-known fact at this point that in the United States and most of the so-called free countries that there is a robust surveillance state in…

Published

on

It’s a well-known fact at this point that in the United States and most of the so-called free countries that there is a robust surveillance state in place, collecting data on the entire populace. This has been proven beyond a shadow of a doubt by people like Edward Snowden, a National Security Agency (NSA) whistleblower who exposed that the NSA was conducting mass surveillance on US citizens and the world as a whole. The NSA used applications like those from Prism Systems to piggyback on corporations and the data collection their users had agreed to in the terms of service. Google would scan all emails sent to a Gmail address to use for personalized advertising. The government then went to these companies and demanded the data, and this is what makes the surveillance state so interesting. Neo-Marxists like Shoshana Zuboff have dubbed this “surveillance capitalism.” In China, the mass surveillance is conducted at a loss. Setting up closed-circuit television cameras and hiring government workers to be a mandatory editorial staff for blogs and social media can get quite expensive. But if you parasitically leech off a profitable business practice it means that the surveillance state will turn a profit, which is a great asset and an even greater weakness for the system. You see, when that is what your surveillance state is predicated on you’ve effectively given your subjects an opt-out button. They stop using services that spy on them. There is software and online services that are called “open source,” which refers to software whose code is publicly available and can be viewed by anyone so that you can see exactly what that software does. The opposite of this, and what you’re likely already familiar with, is proprietary software. Open-source software generally markets itself as privacy respecting and doesn’t participate in data collection. Services like that can really undo the tricky situation we’ve found ourselves in. It’s a simple fact of life that when the government is given a power—whether that be to regulate, surveil, tax, or plunder—it is nigh impossible to wrestle it away from the state outside somehow disposing of the state entirely. This is why the issue of undoing mass surveillance is of the utmost importance. If the government has the power to spy on its populace, it will. There are people, like the creators of The Social Dilemma, who think that the solution to these privacy invasions isn’t less government but more government, arguing that data collection should be taxed to dissuade the practice or that regulation needs to be put into place to actively prevent abuses. This is silly to anyone who understands the effect regulations have and how the internet really works. You see, data collection is necessary. You can’t have email without some elements of data collection because it’s simply how the protocol functions. The issue is how that data is stored and used. A tax on data collection itself will simply become another cost of doing business. A large company like Google can afford to pay a tax. But a company like Proton Mail, a smaller, more privacy-respecting business, likely couldn’t. Proton Mail’s business model is based on paid subscriptions. If there were additional taxes imposed on them, it’s possible that they would not be able to afford the cost and would be forced out of the market. To reiterate, if one really cares about the destruction of the surveillance state, the first step is to personally make changes to how you interact with online services and to whom you choose to give your data.

Read More

Continue Reading

International

Stock Market Today: Stocks turn higher as Treasury yields retreat; big tech earnings up next

A pullback in Treasury yields has stocks moving higher Monday heading into a busy earnings week and a key 2-year bond auction later on Tuesday.

Published

on

Updated at 11:52 am EDT U.S. stocks turned higher Monday, heading into the busiest earnings week of the year on Wall Street, amid a pullback in Treasury bond yields that followed the first breach of 5% for 10-year notes since 2007. Investors, however, continue to track developments in Israel's war with Hamas, which launched its deadly attack from Gaza three weeks ago, as leaders around the region, and the wider world, work to contain the fighting and broker at least a form of cease-fire. Humanitarian aid is also making its way into Gaza, through the territory's border with Egypt, as officials continue to work for the release of more than 200 Israelis taken hostage by Hamas during the October 7 attack. Those diplomatic efforts eased some of the market's concern in overnight trading, but the lingering risk that regional adversaries such as Iran, or even Saudi Arabia, could be drawn into the conflict continues to blunt risk appetite. Still, the U.S. dollar index, which tracks the greenback against a basket of six global currencies and acts as the safe-haven benchmark in times of market turmoil, fell 0.37% in early New York trading 105.773, suggesting some modest moves into riskier assets. The Japanese yen, however, eased past the 150 mark in overnight dealing, a level that has some traders awaiting intervention from the Bank of Japan and which may have triggered small amounts of dollar sales and yen purchases. In the bond market, benchmark 10-year note yields breached the 5% mark in overnight trading, after briefly surpassing that level late last week for the first time since 2007, but were last seen trading at 4.867% ahead of $141 billion in 2-year, 5-year and 7-year note auctions later this week. Global oil prices were also lower, following two consecutive weekly gains that has take Brent crude, the global pricing benchmark, firmly past $90 a barrel amid supply disruption concerns tied to the middle east conflict. Brent contracts for December delivery were last seen $1.06 lower on the session at $91.07 per barrel while WTI futures contract for the same month fell $1.36 to $86.72 per barrel. Market volatility gauges were also active, with the CBOE Group's VIX index hitting a fresh seven-month high of $23.08 before easing to $20.18 later in the session. That level suggests traders are expecting ranges on the S&P 500 of around 1.26%, or 53 points, over the next month. A busy earnings week also indicates the likelihood of elevated trading volatility, with 158 S&P 500 companies reporting third quarter earnings over the next five days, including mega cap tech names such as Google parent Alphabet  (GOOGL) - Get Free Report, Microsoft  (MSFT) - Get Free Report, retail and cloud computing giant Amazon  (AMZN) - Get Free Report and Facebook owner Meta Platforms  (META) - Get Free Report. "It’s shaping up to be a big week for the market and it comes as the S&P 500 is testing a key level—the four-month low it set earlier this month," said Chris Larkin, managing director for trading and investing at E*TRADE from Morgan Stanley. "How the market responds to that test may hinge on sentiment, which often plays a larger-than-average role around this time of year," he added. "And right now, concerns about rising interest rates and geopolitical turmoil have the potential to exacerbate the market’s swings." Heading into the middle of the trading day on Wall Street, the S&P 500, which is down 8% from its early July peak, the highest of the year, was up 10 points, or 0.25%. The Dow Jones Industrial Average, which slumped into negative territory for the year last week, was marked 10 points lower while the Nasdaq, which fell 4.31% last week, was up 66 points, or 0.51%. In overseas markets, Europe's Stoxx 600 was marked 0.11% lower by the close of Frankfurt trading, with markets largely tracking U.S. stocks as well as the broader conflict in Israel. In Asia, a  slump in China stocks took the benchmark CSI 300 to a fresh 2019 low and pulled the region-wide MSCI ex-Japan 0.72% lower into the close of trading.
  • Get investment guidance from trusted portfolio managers without the management fees. Sign up for Action Alerts PLUS now.

Read More

Continue Reading

International

iPhone Maker Foxconn Investigated By Chinese Authorities

Foxconn, the Taiwanese company that manufactures iPhones on behalf of Apple (AAPL), is being investigated by Chinese authorities, according to multiple…

Published

on

Foxconn, the Taiwanese company that manufactures iPhones on behalf of Apple (AAPL), is being investigated by Chinese authorities, according to multiple media reports. Foxconn’s business has been searched by Chinese authorities and China’s main tax authority has conducted inspections of Foxconn’s manufacturing operations in the Chinese provinces of Guangdong and Jiangsu. At the same time, China’s natural-resources department has begun onsite investigations into Foxconn’s land use in Henan and Hubei provinces within China. Foxconn has manufacturing facilities focused on Apple products in three of the Chinese provinces where authorities are carrying out searches. While headquartered in Taiwan, Foxconn has a huge manufacturing presence in China and is a large employer in the nation of 1.4 billion people. The investigations suggest that China is ramping up pressure on the company as Foxconn considers major investments in India, and as presidential elections approach in Taiwan. Foxconn founder Terry Gou said in August of this year that he intends to run for the Taiwanese presidency. He has resigned from the company’s board of directors but continues to hold a 12.5% stake in the company. Gou is currently in fourth place in the polls ahead of the election that is scheduled to be held in January 2024. The potential impact on Apple and its iPhone manufacturing comes amid rising political tensions between politicians in Washington, D.C. and Beijing. Apple’s stock has risen 16% over the last 12 months and currently trades at $172.88 U.S. per share.  

Read More

Continue Reading

Trending