Connect with us

Government

What are “meme stocks” & why do they matter? Definition & risk

The term “meme stock” refers to any stock that, for some reason or another, has gained a frenzied following of retail investors, often due to its status…

Published

on

Meme stocks like GME and AMC tend to be highly volatile. 

Clay Banks via Unsplash; Canva

What is a meme stock?

The term “meme stock” refers to any stock that, for some reason or another, has gained a frenzied following of retail investors, often due to its status as an “underdog” in the market. Meme stocks are discussed heavily on social media—especially Reddit and X (formerly Twitter)—where amateur investors come together to share research and theories about which struggling stock might be the next one to go “to the moon.”

Many meme stocks are companies with declining cultural relevance in the digital age (e.g., retail stores) whose stock prices have been beaten down by short sellers betting on their demise. A large part of meme stock culture is the idea that retail traders can use their collective influence to “stick it to the man” by pumping up the value of stocks that have been heavily shorted by large, institutional investors like hedge funds.

Why are meme stocks called meme stocks?

Meme stocks derive their name from the concept of a meme, which is a visual joke or comic shared widely on social media. And much like memes that explode in popularity on social media apps, meme stocks, too, tend to “go viral,” experiencing drastically increased trading volume and volatility once being brought into the limelight on social media by speculative retail traders.

This meme first appeared around 2018 and saw a resurgence in popularity during the meme stock frenzy of 2020 and 2021. 

Meming Wiki

A short history of meme stocks and their rise to prominence

While the meme stock phenomenon has no agreed-upon start date, most investors and analysts point toward 2020’s COVID-19 lockdown era as the breeding ground for the phenomenon, which has since become a major force in the stock market. At the time, the now-infamous “stonks” meme (above) had been circulating on Facebook, Reddit, Twitter (now X), and elsewhere for a year or two, and a new generation of stimulus-check-fueled retail investors with nothing but free time and fee-free trading apps had taken its bold and irreverent message to heart.

r/WallStreetBets: The meme-stock breeding ground

The nexus of this growing community was a Reddit messageboard called r/WallStreetBets, a speculative, crass, and reckless cousin of traditional investing subreddits like r/stocks and r/investing. The subreddit’s users (known within the community as “apes”) encourage and applaud risky investment moves known as “YOLOs” (you only live once), in which users bet large amounts of money (like their entire retirement savings) on a single stock, or even on derivative securities like options contracts.

As time passes, those who YOLOd their savings eventually post the results of their big bets, usually in the form of screenshots from their investment apps showing massive losses (or, less commonly, massive gains). These screenshots are known colloquially among the r/wallstreetbets community as “loss p*rn” and “gain p*rn.”

It’s important to note, however, that despite the community’s endorsement of incredibly risky trades (and its widespread use of politically incorrect terminology), many of the messageboard’s users are dedicated traders who conducted in-depth stock market research (known in the community as DD, or due diligence) and explained the reasoning behind their trades in depth to others on the forum.

Video-game retailer GameStop was the poster child of r/WallStreetBet's army of retail traders. 

JJBers, CC BY 2.0 via Flickr

Keith Gill and the Gamestop short squeeze saga

The first generation of meme stocks was born out of this non-traditional community of uncouth online retail traders around August 2020. At this time, a user named Keith Gill (known as Roaring Kitty on YouTube and u/DeepF**kingValue on Reddit) posted a video in which he explained that GameStop (NYSE: GME), a brick-and-mortar video game retailer known for operating stores out of shopping malls, was fundamentally undervalued and had the highest short interest of any publicly traded stock at the time, making it ripe for a short squeeze (a rapid rise in price caused by short sellers scrambling to buy shares to cover their short positions) should enough investors buy its stock.

In fact, Gamestop’s short interest was around 140%, meaning that almost 40% more shares had been sold short than even existed as float (publicly available shares). The video gained traction, people took notice, and many investors began buying stock in the struggling retailer. Activist investor and former Chewy.com CEO Ryan Cohen got in on the action and bought a massive amount of GME stock, accumulating over 10% of the company’s shares by November 2020 and joining its board soon after. This, combined with the buying action of Reddit’s army of retail investors, caused the stock’s price to rise rapidly.

As Gamestop’s stock continued to rise in price, hedge funds began to buy large volumes of shares to cover their positions, much like Gill had predicted. This took time because more shares were sold short than were available, and in the interim, both institutional and retail investors were pressing the buy button left and right, causing demand to far outweigh supply and sending the stock’s price skyward.

GME eventually reached a high of nearly $500 per share (after starting from a low of around $5 at the time of the release of Gill’s video), marking the peak of the meteoric short squeeze that made “meme stocks” a household term.

During and after the GME short squeeze, a number of other meme stocks emerged, and some experienced short squeezes of their own, although none were as drastic as Gamestop’s. Other meme stocks popularized during and after 2020 included theater operator AMC, software company BlackBerry, and struggling brick-and-mortar retailer Bed Bath & Beyond, all of which, like Gamestop, were considered by most of Wall Street to be “past their prime.”

A guide to meme-stock lingo

Meme stock traders, especially those who frequent r/WallStreetBets, share a unique vernacular that can be difficult to interpret for those who are unfamiliar with the community. The following are some of the most common colloquial words and phrases popularized by the subreddit.

  • Apes: The term “apes” refers to meme stock traders who work together to buy and hold heavily shorted stocks to put upward pressure on their prices. “Apes together strong” is a popular anthem among meme-stock holders when encouraging one another to continue to hold onto struggling stocks rather than capitulating.
  • Bagholders: A “bagholder” is anyone who has amassed a significant amount of a particular meme stock and stands to benefit should its price rally due to a short squeeze.
  • Buy the dip: “Buy the dip” is a phrase used to encourage other apes and bagholders to take advantage of declining meme stock prices by buying more shares when prices fall in order to lower one’s average cost per share.
  • DD: “DD,” or “due diligence” refers to research conducted about the fundamental and technical factors that could make a stock a good buy because it is undervalued, ripe for a short squeeze, or both. Many r/WallStreetBets users write up in-depth DD reports and share them on the forum for other users to review.
  • Degenerates: Users of WSB often refer to themselves and each other as “degenerates” in reference to their proclivity for gambling large amounts of money on speculative stock trades.
  • Diamond and paper hands: “Diamond hands” refers to users who maintain conviction in their chosen meme stocks, refusing to sell even as their prices plummet. “Paper hands” is the concept’s counterpart, used to refer to users who capitulate and sell their meme stocks as prices decline out of fear of additional losses.
  • FOMO: FOMO, or “fear of missing out” refers to the action of buyers who are late to hop on a trend, buying into a stock not because of research, but because its price is rising and they don’t want to miss out on gains should it continue to do so.
  • Gain and loss p*rn: “Gain and loss porn” refer to screenshots posted by retail investors that show the decline or increase in value of a previously initiated position in a stock. Typically, these are posted in r/WallStreetBets as follow-ups to previously shared “YOLO” posts.
  • Hold the line: “Hold the line” is a popular imperative shared between community members to encourage one another to maintain their positions in a meme stock whose price is falling.
  • Stonks: “Stonks” is a reference to the widely shared meme above and is used in the WSB community to refer to meme stocks and/or stocks in general.
  • Tendies: “Tendies,” short for chicken tenders, is a euphemism for the capital gains that could result from a successful stock market play. This term is a somewhat self-deprecating nod to the immature nature of WSB users, as chicken tenders are popularly found on children’s menus.
  • To the moon: “To the moon” refers to the massive rise in price users hope will occur should a meme stock they’ve invested in experience a short squeeze (e.g., “I just bought 30 more shares—GME to the moon!”).
  • We like the stock: “We like the stock” is a popular collective retort uttered by WSB users in response to any questioning as to the “why” behind their risky investments. Jim Cramer, famed investor and founder of TheStreet, repeated the phrase on air during a late January episode of CNBC's "Halftime Report" in 2021 amid the height of the GME short squeeze.
  • YOLO: “YOLO,” which stands for “you only live once,” is a popular phrase used to explain the rationale behind unusual or risky decisions. The WSB community adopted it to refer to large investments in a single company—essentially “all-in” style bets, usually on a popular meme stock.

How much influence does r/wallstreetbets have in the stock market?

It is difficult to quantify exactly how much influence an online community has on the price movements of securities that are traded at a massive scale on a daily basis, but Wall Street certainly took notice when Reddit’s mob of retail investors nearly toppled some of its largest players during the GameStop short squeeze.

Overall, hedge funds that had shorted Gamestop lost at least $10 billion over the course of the squeeze as a result of the collective efforts of r/WallStreetBets users and the loosely associated diaspora of GME retail investors. Melvin Capital, a large hedge fund that had a particularly large short position in GME, lost around $6.8 billion over the course of the meme stock rally.

It’s clear that in the digital age, retail investors have more market influence than ever before. Between fee-free trading apps like Robinhood and online communities like Reddit where amateur investors can share information and learn how to analyze stocks, institutional investors are more weary than ever of the threat that a loose collective of everyday investors could pose to their bottom line.

Interestingly, a 2022 study published by the Lund University School of Economics and Management failed to yield a statistically significant correlation between the sentiment of WSB users and the returns of the forum’s 10 most-discussed stocks.

This certainly doesn’t mean that the group lacks material influence, however. Analyzing the sentiment of an irreverent online community is far from an exact science, and even if there was a reliable way to do so, countless factors influence the movements of stock prices, so isolating the influence of any single factor isn’t a particularly realistic goal.

The meme-stock short-squeeze life cycle

Meme stocks, especially those that experience short-squeezes, tend to go through these four stages. 

Canva

Meme stock short squeezes typically have four general phases:

  1. During the “early adopter” phase, certain investors identify a stock they believe is undervalued, over-shorted, and could be ripe for a squeeze. They begin investing large amounts in it, potentially causing the price of the stock to rise.
  2. During the “information-sharing” phase, other retail traders with an ear to investing messageboards learn about the case for the stock and begin buying shares and spreading information online, encouraging others to do the same.
  3. During the “FOMO” phase, the meme stock gains widespread popularity online and possibly even in the news. A herd mentality develops, and more casual retail investors begin buying in as the price continues to rise for fear of missing out on large gains.
  4. During the “peak” phase of the squeeze, prudent investors begin taking profits and exiting their positions to lock in their gains. The earlier they bought in, the more they stand to make. Less prudent investors hold their positions or continue buying based on encouragement from other traders and the fear of missing out on additional gains should the stock’s price continue to skyrocket. The stock hits its peak and begins to drop in price relatively rapidly, decimating the gains of those who remain invested. Capitulation occurs as more traders liquidate their positions to minimize their losses.

Are meme stocks good investments?

Meme stocks aren’t necessarily good or bad investments. The premise of most meme stocks is that they are undervalued and over-shorted despite decent fundamentals, but this premise fails to take their fading cultural, societal, and technological relevance into account. Large, institutional investors tend to be focused on the future value of securities, which is why they tend to short (bet against) stocks with seemingly bleak outlooks.

Additionally, meme stocks are notoriously volatile, and timing their ups and downs can be very difficult. High volatility can translate to sizeable short-term gains, which makes them attractive to active traders. For more casual, long-term investors, however, meme stocks probably aren’t the best portfolio fodder, as their price increases don’t tend to last long, and their risk tends to outweigh their upside potentiaal.

For active, risk-tolerant traders who enjoy examining technical indicators and have plenty of time to watch the market and react quickly to new data, meme-stock trading can produce significant gains. That being said, past performance is never a guarantee of future results, so any traders considering betting big on the next WSB meme stock phenomenon should tread carefully.

What meme stocks are trending now?

Traders interested in meme stocks who want to keep tabs on what’s popular on r/WallStreetBets can examine ApeWisdom’s list of WSB’s current favorite tickers

Read More

Continue Reading

International

Beloved mall retailer files Chapter 7 bankruptcy, will liquidate

The struggling chain has given up the fight and will close hundreds of stores around the world.

Published

on

It has been a brutal period for several popular retailers. The fallout from the covid pandemic and a challenging economic environment have pushed numerous chains into bankruptcy with Tuesday Morning, Christmas Tree Shops, and Bed Bath & Beyond all moving from Chapter 11 to Chapter 7 bankruptcy liquidation.

In all three of those cases, the companies faced clear financial pressures that led to inventory problems and vendors demanding faster, or even upfront payment. That creates a sort of inevitability.

Related: Beloved retailer finds life after bankruptcy, new famous owner

When a retailer faces financial pressure it sets off a cycle where vendors become wary of selling them items. That leads to barren shelves and no ability for the chain to sell its way out of its financial problems. 

Once that happens bankruptcy generally becomes the only option. Sometimes that means a Chapter 11 filing which gives the company a chance to negotiate with its creditors. In some cases, deals can be worked out where vendors extend longer terms or even forgive some debts, and banks offer an extension of loan terms.

In other cases, new funding can be secured which assuages vendor concerns or the company might be taken over by its vendors. Sometimes, as was the case with David's Bridal, a new owner steps in, adds new money, and makes deals with creditors in order to give the company a new lease on life.

It's rare that a retailer moves directly into Chapter 7 bankruptcy and decides to liquidate without trying to find a new source of funding.

Mall traffic has varied depending upon the type of mall.

Image source: Getty Images

The Body Shop has bad news for customers  

The Body Shop has been in a very public fight for survival. Fears began when the company closed half of its locations in the United Kingdom. That was followed by a bankruptcy-style filing in Canada and an abrupt closure of its U.S. stores on March 4.

"The Canadian subsidiary of the global beauty and cosmetics brand announced it has started restructuring proceedings by filing a Notice of Intention (NOI) to Make a Proposal pursuant to the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act (Canada). In the same release, the company said that, as of March 1, 2024, The Body Shop US Limited has ceased operations," Chain Store Age reported.

A message on the company's U.S. website shared a simple message that does not appear to be the entire story.

"We're currently undergoing planned maintenance, but don't worry we're due to be back online soon."

That same message is still on the company's website, but a new filing makes it clear that the site is not down for maintenance, it's down for good.

The Body Shop files for Chapter 7 bankruptcy

While the future appeared bleak for The Body Shop, fans of the brand held out hope that a savior would step in. That's not going to be the case. 

The Body Shop filed for Chapter 7 bankruptcy in the United States.

"The US arm of the ethical cosmetics group has ceased trading at its 50 outlets. On Saturday (March 9), it filed for Chapter 7 insolvency, under which assets are sold off to clear debts, putting about 400 jobs at risk including those in a distribution center that still holds millions of dollars worth of stock," The Guardian reported.

After its closure in the United States, the survival of the brand remains very much in doubt. About half of the chain's stores in the United Kingdom remain open along with its Australian stores. 

The future of those stores remains very much in doubt and the chain has shared that it needs new funding in order for them to continue operating.

The Body Shop did not respond to a request for comment from TheStreet.   

Read More

Continue Reading

Government

Are Voters Recoiling Against Disorder?

Are Voters Recoiling Against Disorder?

Authored by Michael Barone via The Epoch Times (emphasis ours),

The headlines coming out of the Super…

Published

on

Are Voters Recoiling Against Disorder?

Authored by Michael Barone via The Epoch Times (emphasis ours),

The headlines coming out of the Super Tuesday primaries have got it right. Barring cataclysmic changes, Donald Trump and Joe Biden will be the Republican and Democratic nominees for president in 2024.

(Left) President Joe Biden delivers remarks on canceling student debt at Culver City Julian Dixon Library in Culver City, Calif., on Feb. 21, 2024. (Right) Republican presidential candidate and former U.S. President Donald Trump stands on stage during a campaign event at Big League Dreams Las Vegas in Las Vegas, Nev., on Jan. 27, 2024. (Mario Tama/Getty Images; David Becker/Getty Images)

With Nikki Haley’s withdrawal, there will be no more significantly contested primaries or caucuses—the earliest both parties’ races have been over since something like the current primary-dominated system was put in place in 1972.

The primary results have spotlighted some of both nominees’ weaknesses.

Donald Trump lost high-income, high-educated constituencies, including the entire metro area—aka the Swamp. Many but by no means all Haley votes there were cast by Biden Democrats. Mr. Trump can’t afford to lose too many of the others in target states like Pennsylvania and Michigan.

Majorities and large minorities of voters in overwhelmingly Latino counties in Texas’s Rio Grande Valley and some in Houston voted against Joe Biden, and even more against Senate nominee Rep. Colin Allred (D-Texas).

Returns from Hispanic precincts in New Hampshire and Massachusetts show the same thing. Mr. Biden can’t afford to lose too many Latino votes in target states like Arizona and Georgia.

When Mr. Trump rode down that escalator in 2015, commentators assumed he’d repel Latinos. Instead, Latino voters nationally, and especially the closest eyewitnesses of Biden’s open-border policy, have been trending heavily Republican.

High-income liberal Democrats may sport lawn signs proclaiming, “In this house, we believe ... no human is illegal.” The logical consequence of that belief is an open border. But modest-income folks in border counties know that flows of illegal immigrants result in disorder, disease, and crime.

There is plenty of impatience with increased disorder in election returns below the presidential level. Consider Los Angeles County, America’s largest county, with nearly 10 million people, more people than 40 of the 50 states. It voted 71 percent for Mr. Biden in 2020.

Current returns show county District Attorney George Gascon winning only 21 percent of the vote in the nonpartisan primary. He’ll apparently face Republican Nathan Hochman, a critic of his liberal policies, in November.

Gascon, elected after the May 2020 death of counterfeit-passing suspect George Floyd in Minneapolis, is one of many county prosecutors supported by billionaire George Soros. His policies include not charging juveniles as adults, not seeking higher penalties for gang membership or use of firearms, and bringing fewer misdemeanor cases.

The predictable result has been increased car thefts, burglaries, and personal robberies. Some 120 assistant district attorneys have left the office, and there’s a backlog of 10,000 unprosecuted cases.

More than a dozen other Soros-backed and similarly liberal prosecutors have faced strong opposition or have left office.

St. Louis prosecutor Kim Gardner resigned last May amid lawsuits seeking her removal, Milwaukee’s John Chisholm retired in January, and Baltimore’s Marilyn Mosby was defeated in July 2022 and convicted of perjury in September 2023. Last November, Loudoun County, Virginia, voters (62 percent Biden) ousted liberal Buta Biberaj, who declined to prosecute a transgender student for assault, and in June 2022 voters in San Francisco (85 percent Biden) recalled famed radical Chesa Boudin.

Similarly, this Tuesday, voters in San Francisco passed ballot measures strengthening police powers and requiring treatment of drug-addicted welfare recipients.

In retrospect, it appears the Floyd video, appearing after three months of COVID-19 confinement, sparked a frenzied, even crazed reaction, especially among the highly educated and articulate. One fatal incident was seen as proof that America’s “systemic racism” was worse than ever and that police forces should be defunded and perhaps abolished.

2020 was “the year America went crazy,” I wrote in January 2021, a year in which police funding was actually cut by Democrats in New York, Los Angeles, San Francisco, Seattle, and Denver. A year in which young New York Times (NYT) staffers claimed they were endangered by the publication of Sen. Tom Cotton’s (R-Ark.) opinion article advocating calling in military forces if necessary to stop rioting, as had been done in Detroit in 1967 and Los Angeles in 1992. A craven NYT publisher even fired the editorial page editor for running the article.

Evidence of visible and tangible discontent with increasing violence and its consequences—barren and locked shelves in Manhattan chain drugstores, skyrocketing carjackings in Washington, D.C.—is as unmistakable in polls and election results as it is in daily life in large metropolitan areas. Maybe 2024 will turn out to be the year even liberal America stopped acting crazy.

Chaos and disorder work against incumbents, as they did in 1968 when Democrats saw their party’s popular vote fall from 61 percent to 43 percent.

Views expressed in this article are opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of The Epoch Times or ZeroHedge.

Tyler Durden Sat, 03/09/2024 - 23:20

Read More

Continue Reading

Government

Veterans Affairs Kept COVID-19 Vaccine Mandate In Place Without Evidence

Veterans Affairs Kept COVID-19 Vaccine Mandate In Place Without Evidence

Authored by Zachary Stieber via The Epoch Times (emphasis ours),

The…

Published

on

Veterans Affairs Kept COVID-19 Vaccine Mandate In Place Without Evidence

Authored by Zachary Stieber via The Epoch Times (emphasis ours),

The U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) reviewed no data when deciding in 2023 to keep its COVID-19 vaccine mandate in place.

Doses of a COVID-19 vaccine in Washington in a file image. (Jacquelyn Martin/Pool/AFP via Getty Images)

VA Secretary Denis McDonough said on May 1, 2023, that the end of many other federal mandates “will not impact current policies at the Department of Veterans Affairs.”

He said the mandate was remaining for VA health care personnel “to ensure the safety of veterans and our colleagues.”

Mr. McDonough did not cite any studies or other data. A VA spokesperson declined to provide any data that was reviewed when deciding not to rescind the mandate. The Epoch Times submitted a Freedom of Information Act for “all documents outlining which data was relied upon when establishing the mandate when deciding to keep the mandate in place.”

The agency searched for such data and did not find any.

The VA does not even attempt to justify its policies with science, because it can’t,” Leslie Manookian, president and founder of the Health Freedom Defense Fund, told The Epoch Times.

“The VA just trusts that the process and cost of challenging its unfounded policies is so onerous, most people are dissuaded from even trying,” she added.

The VA’s mandate remains in place to this day.

The VA’s website claims that vaccines “help protect you from getting severe illness” and “offer good protection against most COVID-19 variants,” pointing in part to observational data from the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) that estimate the vaccines provide poor protection against symptomatic infection and transient shielding against hospitalization.

There have also been increasing concerns among outside scientists about confirmed side effects like heart inflammation—the VA hid a safety signal it detected for the inflammation—and possible side effects such as tinnitus, which shift the benefit-risk calculus.

President Joe Biden imposed a slate of COVID-19 vaccine mandates in 2021. The VA was the first federal agency to implement a mandate.

President Biden rescinded the mandates in May 2023, citing a drop in COVID-19 cases and hospitalizations. His administration maintains the choice to require vaccines was the right one and saved lives.

“Our administration’s vaccination requirements helped ensure the safety of workers in critical workforces including those in the healthcare and education sectors, protecting themselves and the populations they serve, and strengthening their ability to provide services without disruptions to operations,” the White House said.

Some experts said requiring vaccination meant many younger people were forced to get a vaccine despite the risks potentially outweighing the benefits, leaving fewer doses for older adults.

By mandating the vaccines to younger people and those with natural immunity from having had COVID, older people in the U.S. and other countries did not have access to them, and many people might have died because of that,” Martin Kulldorff, a professor of medicine on leave from Harvard Medical School, told The Epoch Times previously.

The VA was one of just a handful of agencies to keep its mandate in place following the removal of many federal mandates.

“At this time, the vaccine requirement will remain in effect for VA health care personnel, including VA psychologists, pharmacists, social workers, nursing assistants, physical therapists, respiratory therapists, peer specialists, medical support assistants, engineers, housekeepers, and other clinical, administrative, and infrastructure support employees,” Mr. McDonough wrote to VA employees at the time.

This also includes VA volunteers and contractors. Effectively, this means that any Veterans Health Administration (VHA) employee, volunteer, or contractor who works in VHA facilities, visits VHA facilities, or provides direct care to those we serve will still be subject to the vaccine requirement at this time,” he said. “We continue to monitor and discuss this requirement, and we will provide more information about the vaccination requirements for VA health care employees soon. As always, we will process requests for vaccination exceptions in accordance with applicable laws, regulations, and policies.”

The version of the shots cleared in the fall of 2022, and available through the fall of 2023, did not have any clinical trial data supporting them.

A new version was approved in the fall of 2023 because there were indications that the shots not only offered temporary protection but also that the level of protection was lower than what was observed during earlier stages of the pandemic.

Ms. Manookian, whose group has challenged several of the federal mandates, said that the mandate “illustrates the dangers of the administrative state and how these federal agencies have become a law unto themselves.”

Tyler Durden Sat, 03/09/2024 - 22:10

Read More

Continue Reading

Trending