Connect with us

Uncategorized

Weekly close risks BTC price ‘double top’ — 5 things to know in Bitcoin this week

Bitcoin battles $26,000 with BTC price action at a crucial decision point heading into the first week of September.
Bitcoin (BTC) launches…

Published

on

Bitcoin battles $26,000 with BTC price action at a crucial decision point heading into the first week of September.

Bitcoin (BTC) launches its first full week of September with BTC price action at a crossroads — can $26,000 return?

After a quiet weekend, the dust has settled on last week’s volatility as crypto markets return to “business as usual.”

Bitcoin lingers in familiar territory, but without a trend, traders and analysts remain undecided about its next moves.

There is certainly no shortage of downside BTC price predictions, with $25,000, $24,750 and even $23,000 all becoming popular targets in recent weeks.

On the other hand, Bulls are thought to have a more difficult task in winning back market momentum.

With network fundamentals set to consolidate recent gains of their own and macro markets quiet, the question as to whether September 2023 will be a classic month of single-digit losses for BTC/USD is now a talking point.

Cointelegraph looks at the main factors influencing BTC price action over the coming days.

Weekend Bitcoin price chops up BTC shorts

Bitcoin offered few surprises in out-of-hours weekend trading — a status quo that could continue with United States equities markets only opening on Sep. 5.

BTC/USD 1-hour chart. Source: TradingView

For most of the past two days, BTC/USD acted in a tight $200 corridor, data from Cointelegraph Markets Pro and TradingView shows, but modest spikes up and down belied the presence of speculative exchange players.

These were noticed by popular trader Skew, who uploaded order book data showing failed shorts being behind Bitcoin’s brief trips past $26,000.

“All it took was someone figuring out where stops were and market buying a few mil in spot then dumping it after forcing out some shorts,” part of additional X (formerly Twitter) commentary added.

Additonal BTC spot market analysis queried whether the weekly close, which came in at around $25,970, would end up as a plan to give bulls a false sense of security.

As Cointelegraph reported, $25,900 was already on the radar for Skew as the level to hold into the weekly candle close.

However, for fellow trader and analyst Rekt Capital, anything below $26,000 was cause for concern on longer timeframes.

Failure to reclaim that level, he warned over the weekend, meant risking a double top structure for 2023, with the area around $31,000 the BTC price ceiling and protracted downside to come.

“A BTC Weekly Candle Close below ~$26,000 (green) would likely confirm the Double Top to kickstart the breakdown process,” he commented on a chart showing the setup.

BTC/USD annotated chart. Source: Rekt Capital/X

Fed speakers headline macro week

A cool macro week is meanwhile a potential source of light relief for risk asset traders.

The coming four-day week for the U.S. holds little in terms of significant macroeconomic data, with the Federal Reserve itself instead in focus.

Ahead of the month’s crunch interest rates decision on Sep. 19, various senior Fed officials will offer commentary on the state of the economy this week. These include Atlanta Fed President Raphael Bostic and New York Fed President John Williams.

“Short week, but it's all about the Fed,” financial commentary resource The Kobeissi Letter summarized on X alongside the main diary dates for the coming days.

It added that Fed policy was “still far from clear” in the run-up to the rates decision.

Bitcoin has become notably less sensitive to Fed comments over the summer, with even those of Fed Chair Jerome Powell not managing to impact BTC price action significantly.

The words used by officials can nonetheless upend market expectations for what will happen with the Fed’s inflation battle.

At the time of writing, per data from CME Group’s FedWatch Tool, markets overwhelmingly expected — with 93% certainty — rates to remain the same in September.

Fed target rate probabilities chart. Source: CME Group

Difficulty due comedown from all-time highs

After surging ahead to new all-time highs two weeks ago, Bitcoin mining difficulty is coming down to earth.

In a modest consolidation, difficulty is expected to drop by around 2.4% at its upcoming automated readjustment on Sep. 5.

This is nothing unusual by historical standards, especially in light of the 6.5% increase seen in mid-August — a boost which came despite BTC price action going the other way.

Bitcoin network fundamentals overview (screenshot). Source: BTC.com

Analyzing the potential cause, James Straten, research and data analyst at crypto insights firm CryptoSlate, flagged an accompanying decrease in Bitcoin miners’ BTC stockpile.

“This has coincided with miner balance decreasing by about 4k BTC, primarily coming from F2Pool that has seen its BTC balance cut in half,” part of weekend X commentary read.

Straten added that any further decrease in BTC price performance could result in additional miner stress, compounding the trend at F2Pool.

“If bitcoin was to experience another drop down we could likely see another miner capitulation,” he warned.

Reacting, IT Tech, a contributor to on-chain analytics platform CryptoQuant, referenced a correlation between “minor” BTC price dips and miners sending BTC to exchanges.

“This action, of course, increased the selling pressure, eventually leading them to sell on the market,” an excerpt from recent comments stated.

IT Tech described the BTC sales as modest in size but occurring “in the worst moments.”

Dormant BTC supply sets new records

Behind the scenes, Bitcoin’s supply is steadily becoming more and more the property of long-term holders.

The latest data from on-chain analytics firm Glassnode reveals several new records pertaining to BTC locked up in long-term storage.

The percentage of the currently mined supply dormant for three years or more is now 40.538% — its highest ever.

The equivalent measure for coins stationary in wallets for at least five years now stands at 29.637% — similarly a new record.

BTC supply last active five years ago or longer chart. Source: Glassnode/X

Supply constriction is a welcome sight for Bitcoin bulls, who conclude that any future demand for BTC will see buyers compete for a smaller amount of the supply.

In a recent analysis, Straten also noted that Bitcoin speculators, commonly called short-term holders, had already distributed BTC to the market.

“Once again, bitcoin short term holders have capitulated roughly 20k BTC sent to exchanges at a loss,” he wrote at the weekend.

“Fourth highest amount this year. This will continue to add to the record divergence between long term holder and short term holder supply.”
Bitcoin transfer volume from short-term holders at a loss annotated chart. Source: James Straten/X

Accompanying Glassnode data showed the volume of BTC sent by short-term holders to exchanges at a loss.

Interest turns back the clock to 2020

Bitcoin is hardly a mainstream conversation topic for the average non-crypto consumer this year, and Google Trends data proves it.

Related: Bitcoin metric with ‘100% long hit rate’ predicts $23K BTC price floor

Normalized search interest is now back at levels seen before BTC/USD broke beyond its old 2017 all-time high of $20,000 in late 2020.

Search activity is heavily linked to BTC price action, and the lack of notable upside events throughout Q2 appears to have contributed to flat mainstream attention.

Google search data for “Bitcoin” (screenshot). Source: Google Trends

Within crypto, meanwhile, the average investor is feeling afraid.

According to the sentiment gauge, the Crypto Fear & Greed Index, “fear” is what currently characterizes the overall market mood.

At 40/100, the Index is in territory familiar since mid-August, when Bitcoin dropped 10%.

Crypto Fear & Greed Index (screenshot). Source: Alternative.me

This article does not contain investment advice or recommendations. Every investment and trading move involves risk, and readers should conduct their own research when making a decision.

Read More

Continue Reading

Uncategorized

February Employment Situation

By Paul Gomme and Peter Rupert The establishment data from the BLS showed a 275,000 increase in payroll employment for February, outpacing the 230,000…

Published

on

By Paul Gomme and Peter Rupert

The establishment data from the BLS showed a 275,000 increase in payroll employment for February, outpacing the 230,000 average over the previous 12 months. The payroll data for January and December were revised down by a total of 167,000. The private sector added 223,000 new jobs, the largest gain since May of last year.

Temporary help services employment continues a steep decline after a sharp post-pandemic rise.

Average hours of work increased from 34.2 to 34.3. The increase, along with the 223,000 private employment increase led to a hefty increase in total hours of 5.6% at an annualized rate, also the largest increase since May of last year.

The establishment report, once again, beat “expectations;” the WSJ survey of economists was 198,000. Other than the downward revisions, mentioned above, another bit of negative news was a smallish increase in wage growth, from $34.52 to $34.57.

The household survey shows that the labor force increased 150,000, a drop in employment of 184,000 and an increase in the number of unemployed persons of 334,000. The labor force participation rate held steady at 62.5, the employment to population ratio decreased from 60.2 to 60.1 and the unemployment rate increased from 3.66 to 3.86. Remember that the unemployment rate is the number of unemployed relative to the labor force (the number employed plus the number unemployed). Consequently, the unemployment rate can go up if the number of unemployed rises holding fixed the labor force, or if the labor force shrinks holding the number unemployed unchanged. An increase in the unemployment rate is not necessarily a bad thing: it may reflect a strong labor market drawing “marginally attached” individuals from outside the labor force. Indeed, there was a 96,000 decline in those workers.

Earlier in the week, the BLS announced JOLTS (Job Openings and Labor Turnover Survey) data for January. There isn’t much to report here as the job openings changed little at 8.9 million, the number of hires and total separations were little changed at 5.7 million and 5.3 million, respectively.

As has been the case for the last couple of years, the number of job openings remains higher than the number of unemployed persons.

Also earlier in the week the BLS announced that productivity increased 3.2% in the 4th quarter with output rising 3.5% and hours of work rising 0.3%.

The bottom line is that the labor market continues its surprisingly (to some) strong performance, once again proving stronger than many had expected. This strength makes it difficult to justify any interest rate cuts soon, particularly given the recent inflation spike.

Read More

Continue Reading

Uncategorized

Mortgage rates fall as labor market normalizes

Jobless claims show an expanding economy. We will only be in a recession once jobless claims exceed 323,000 on a four-week moving average.

Published

on

Everyone was waiting to see if this week’s jobs report would send mortgage rates higher, which is what happened last month. Instead, the 10-year yield had a muted response after the headline number beat estimates, but we have negative job revisions from previous months. The Federal Reserve’s fear of wage growth spiraling out of control hasn’t materialized for over two years now and the unemployment rate ticked up to 3.9%. For now, we can say the labor market isn’t tight anymore, but it’s also not breaking.

The key labor data line in this expansion is the weekly jobless claims report. Jobless claims show an expanding economy that has not lost jobs yet. We will only be in a recession once jobless claims exceed 323,000 on a four-week moving average.

From the Fed: In the week ended March 2, initial claims for unemployment insurance benefits were flat, at 217,000. The four-week moving average declined slightly by 750, to 212,250


Below is an explanation of how we got here with the labor market, which all started during COVID-19.

1. I wrote the COVID-19 recovery model on April 7, 2020, and retired it on Dec. 9, 2020. By that time, the upfront recovery phase was done, and I needed to model out when we would get the jobs lost back.

2. Early in the labor market recovery, when we saw weaker job reports, I doubled and tripled down on my assertion that job openings would get to 10 million in this recovery. Job openings rose as high as to 12 million and are currently over 9 million. Even with the massive miss on a job report in May 2021, I didn’t waver.

Currently, the jobs openings, quit percentage and hires data are below pre-COVID-19 levels, which means the labor market isn’t as tight as it once was, and this is why the employment cost index has been slowing data to move along the quits percentage.  

2-US_Job_Quits_Rate-1-2

3. I wrote that we should get back all the jobs lost to COVID-19 by September of 2022. At the time this would be a speedy labor market recovery, and it happened on schedule, too

Total employment data

4. This is the key one for right now: If COVID-19 hadn’t happened, we would have between 157 million and 159 million jobs today, which would have been in line with the job growth rate in February 2020. Today, we are at 157,808,000. This is important because job growth should be cooling down now. We are more in line with where the labor market should be when averaging 140K-165K monthly. So for now, the fact that we aren’t trending between 140K-165K means we still have a bit more recovery kick left before we get down to those levels. 




From BLS: Total nonfarm payroll employment rose by 275,000 in February, and the unemployment rate increased to 3.9 percent, the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics reported today. Job gains occurred in health care, in government, in food services and drinking places, in social assistance, and in transportation and warehousing.

Here are the jobs that were created and lost in the previous month:

IMG_5092

In this jobs report, the unemployment rate for education levels looks like this:

  • Less than a high school diploma: 6.1%
  • High school graduate and no college: 4.2%
  • Some college or associate degree: 3.1%
  • Bachelor’s degree or higher: 2.2%
IMG_5093_320f22

Today’s report has continued the trend of the labor data beating my expectations, only because I am looking for the jobs data to slow down to a level of 140K-165K, which hasn’t happened yet. I wouldn’t categorize the labor market as being tight anymore because of the quits ratio and the hires data in the job openings report. This also shows itself in the employment cost index as well. These are key data lines for the Fed and the reason we are going to see three rate cuts this year.

Read More

Continue Reading

Uncategorized

Inside The Most Ridiculous Jobs Report In History: Record 1.2 Million Immigrant Jobs Added In One Month

Inside The Most Ridiculous Jobs Report In History: Record 1.2 Million Immigrant Jobs Added In One Month

Last month we though that the January…

Published

on

Inside The Most Ridiculous Jobs Report In History: Record 1.2 Million Immigrant Jobs Added In One Month

Last month we though that the January jobs report was the "most ridiculous in recent history" but, boy, were we wrong because this morning the Biden department of goalseeked propaganda (aka BLS) published the February jobs report, and holy crap was that something else. Even Goebbels would blush. 

What happened? Let's take a closer look.

On the surface, it was (almost) another blockbuster jobs report, certainly one which nobody expected, or rather just one bank out of 76 expected. Starting at the top, the BLS reported that in February the US unexpectedly added 275K jobs, with just one research analyst (from Dai-Ichi Research) expecting a higher number.

Some context: after last month's record 4-sigma beat, today's print was "only" 3 sigma higher than estimates. Needless to say, two multiple sigma beats in a row used to only happen in the USSR... and now in the US, apparently.

Before we go any further, a quick note on what last month we said was "the most ridiculous jobs report in recent history": it appears the BLS read our comments and decided to stop beclowing itself. It did that by slashing last month's ridiculous print by over a third, and revising what was originally reported as a massive 353K beat to just 229K,  a 124K revision, which was the biggest one-month negative revision in two years!

Of course, that does not mean that this month's jobs print won't be revised lower: it will be, and not just that month but every other month until the November election because that's the only tool left in the Biden admin's box: pretend the economic and jobs are strong, then revise them sharply lower the next month, something we pointed out first last summer and which has not failed to disappoint once.

To be fair, not every aspect of the jobs report was stellar (after all, the BLS had to give it some vague credibility). Take the unemployment rate, after flatlining between 3.4% and 3.8% for two years - and thus denying expectations from Sahm's Rule that a recession may have already started - in February the unemployment rate unexpectedly jumped to 3.9%, the highest since February 2022 (with Black unemployment spiking by 0.3% to 5.6%, an indicator which the Biden admin will quickly slam as widespread economic racism or something).

And then there were average hourly earnings, which after surging 0.6% MoM in January (since revised to 0.5%) and spooking markets that wage growth is so hot, the Fed will have no choice but to delay cuts, in February the number tumbled to just 0.1%, the lowest in two years...

... for one simple reason: last month's average wage surge had nothing to do with actual wages, and everything to do with the BLS estimate of hours worked (which is the denominator in the average wage calculation) which last month tumbled to just 34.1 (we were led to believe) the lowest since the covid pandemic...

... but has since been revised higher while the February print rose even more, to 34.3, hence why the latest average wage data was once again a product not of wages going up, but of how long Americans worked in any weekly period, in this case higher from 34.1 to 34.3, an increase which has a major impact on the average calculation.

While the above data points were examples of some latent weakness in the latest report, perhaps meant to give it a sheen of veracity, it was everything else in the report that was a problem starting with the BLS's latest choice of seasonal adjustments (after last month's wholesale revision), which have gone from merely laughable to full clownshow, as the following comparison between the monthly change in BLS and ADP payrolls shows. The trend is clear: the Biden admin numbers are now clearly rising even as the impartial ADP (which directly logs employment numbers at the company level and is far more accurate), shows an accelerating slowdown.

But it's more than just the Biden admin hanging its "success" on seasonal adjustments: when one digs deeper inside the jobs report, all sorts of ugly things emerge... such as the growing unprecedented divergence between the Establishment (payrolls) survey and much more accurate Household (actual employment) survey. To wit, while in January the BLS claims 275K payrolls were added, the Household survey found that the number of actually employed workers dropped for the third straight month (and 4 in the past 5), this time by 184K (from 161.152K to 160.968K).

This means that while the Payrolls series hits new all time highs every month since December 2020 (when according to the BLS the US had its last month of payrolls losses), the level of Employment has not budged in the past year. Worse, as shown in the chart below, such a gaping divergence has opened between the two series in the past 4 years, that the number of Employed workers would need to soar by 9 million (!) to catch up to what Payrolls claims is the employment situation.

There's more: shifting from a quantitative to a qualitative assessment, reveals just how ugly the composition of "new jobs" has been. Consider this: the BLS reports that in February 2024, the US had 132.9 million full-time jobs and 27.9 million part-time jobs. Well, that's great... until you look back one year and find that in February 2023 the US had 133.2 million full-time jobs, or more than it does one year later! And yes, all the job growth since then has been in part-time jobs, which have increased by 921K since February 2023 (from 27.020 million to 27.941 million).

Here is a summary of the labor composition in the past year: all the new jobs have been part-time jobs!

But wait there's even more, because now that the primary season is over and we enter the heart of election season and political talking points will be thrown around left and right, especially in the context of the immigration crisis created intentionally by the Biden administration which is hoping to import millions of new Democratic voters (maybe the US can hold the presidential election in Honduras or Guatemala, after all it is their citizens that will be illegally casting the key votes in November), what we find is that in February, the number of native-born workers tumbled again, sliding by a massive 560K to just 129.807 million. Add to this the December data, and we get a near-record 2.4 million plunge in native-born workers in just the past 3 months (only the covid crash was worse)!

The offset? A record 1.2 million foreign-born (read immigrants, both legal and illegal but mostly illegal) workers added in February!

Said otherwise, not only has all job creation in the past 6 years has been exclusively for foreign-born workers...

Source: St Louis Fed FRED Native Born and Foreign Born

... but there has been zero job-creation for native born workers since June 2018!

This is a huge issue - especially at a time of an illegal alien flood at the southwest border...

... and is about to become a huge political scandal, because once the inevitable recession finally hits, there will be millions of furious unemployed Americans demanding a more accurate explanation for what happened - i.e., the illegal immigration floodgates that were opened by the Biden admin.

Which is also why Biden's handlers will do everything in their power to insure there is no official recession before November... and why after the election is over, all economic hell will finally break loose. Until then, however, expect the jobs numbers to get even more ridiculous.

Tyler Durden Fri, 03/08/2024 - 13:30

Read More

Continue Reading

Trending