Connect with us

March Monthly

The investment climate is changing.  The reflation trade has gained traction.  Bond yields rose sharply, and curves steepened.  The dollar value of the negative-yielding bonds in the world fell from a peak last December of around $18.4 trillion to…

Published

on

The investment climate is changing.  The reflation trade has gained traction.  Bond yields rose sharply, and curves steepened.  The dollar value of the negative-yielding bonds in the world fell from a peak last December of around $18.4 trillion to $12.6 trillion, the least since last July.    

Commodity prices continue to move higher.  The CRB Index rose nearly 9.5% in February and brings the gain to almost 32% since the end of October.  Equities rallied strongly in the first half of February before a dramatic sell-off in the second half of the month that hit the high-flying tech sector hard. Financials and commodity companies outperformed. In the foreign exchange market, the optimism that the combination of the vaccine and stimulus efforts will make for a strong recovery is expected as the year progresses. It is expressed in the outperformance of the Antipodean and the Scandinavian currencies.  The retreat in equities offered little succor to the perceived safe-haven Swiss franc and Japanese yen, both of whom underperformed in February.

Top honors last month, though, went to sterling with its 1.6% gain.  It has now risen for five consecutive months, matching its longest streak since the end of 2003/early 2004, for a cumulative increase of almost 7.8% against the dollar and nearly 4.3% against the euro.  Sterling’s outperformance may reflect its relatively successful rollout of the vaccine and ideas that this will lead to a favorable economic divergence. Also, speculation swung from the possibility of negative rates to a hike before the Bank of England currently signals. Some observers suspect that outside of the EU, sterling’s quantitative characteristics may change.  There simply has not been sufficient time yet to reach a significant conclusion.  According to SWIFT, sterling’s share on the payment and messaging system slipped to 6.8% in January from a little more than 7% a year ago. 

The reflation theme has three components. The first is the early recovery in Asia, and especially China.  Demand for industrial commodities and foodstuffs begins there.  Chinese demand has boosted inter-Asian trade and helped blunt the impact of weak domestic demand in other countries, including Japan. The second component, optimism, stems from the increasing availability of a few vaccines.  Many countries have struggled with the distribution, but there is good reason to expect that as the kinks are addressed, production of the vaccines will increase, other vaccines will be approved, and inoculations will accelerate. 

The third is the huge fiscal stimulus the US is providing.  President Biden is making good on his campaign pledge for a large fiscal stimulus package.  The exact size is not yet clear, but it may be around $1.5 trillion, on top of the $900 bln approved last December, or something around 14% of GDP.  The economy is already sizzling with strong, and forecasts for H1 21 GDP are being revised higher.  The 5.3% surge in January retail sales more than offset the cumulative 2.4% contraction seen in Q4. Industrial output rose a strong 0.9%, more than twice what economists expected.  The stimulus will be approved before the extended unemployment benefits end in the middle of March.  Linking some support programs to economic performance instead of a fixed date may help minimize the risks of a fiscal cliff.  Shortly after the fiscal measures are passed, attention will turn to the large infrastructure program.  Talk is that this public-private effort could be as much as $2-$4 trillion.  

The monetary and fiscal stimulus has created a great deal of liquidity.  The peak may not yet be at hand. As part of America's fiscal dysfunctionality, the Treasury must run down its cash balances at the Federal Reserve before the end of summer under the terms of the debt ceiling waiver, which must once again be addressed.  Some of the drawdown was going to happen in any event as stimulus funds are spent. As these processes take place, the pressure will mount on the short end of the curve.  In February, for the first time since last March, the four- and eight-week bills were auctioned with no yield, and the six-month T-bill was auctioned at the end of the month with the lowest yield since late 2014.  The overnight repo fell below zero.  

Given the frenzy over the trading in some small company shares in the US, a brief short squeeze in silver, and the incredible rise in the cryptocurrencies and especially Bitcoin (43%+ in February alone) has spurred talk of a “bull market in everything.” The MSCI global equity index is up 1.7% year-to-date after losing 3.3% in the last week of February.  It rose 14.3% last year after a 24% surge in 2019. Japan’s Nikkei reached levels not seen since the bubble in the early 1990s.  Yet, in fairness, "the bull market in everything" was the cover of the Economist in October 2017. 

Central banks, including the Federal Reserve and the European Central Bank will be updating their economic forecasts in March. Given the fiscal stimulus, Fed officials may upgrade their economic outlook.  The ECB staff has good reason to downgrade its projections.  This divergence is an important characteristic of the reflation theme.  Fiscal and monetary policies are more aggressive in the US than in Europe or Japan.  The economic and financial consequences may not be as straightforward and linear as economists often suggest. Central banks have been buying bonds in a rising interest rate environment, implying that they ultimately may be price takers, not givers.  There is probably the most scope for the Bank of Japan to adjust policy.  Market talk has focused on the BOJ possibly pulling back from its ETF purchases and/or allowing the 10-year yield to fluctuate more, i.e., tolerate a greater increase. 

Two state elections in Germany may shed light on the mood of voters ahead of the national elections in the fall that will see a new Chancellor for the first time since 2005.  In Rhineland-Palatinate, the SPD leads a coalition with the FDP and Greens (Alliance 90), with the slimmest of majorities.  The Greens seem to be doing well, and the status quo may continue.  The AfD appears to be doing a little better but could be coming from disenchanted CDU voters.

The election in Baden-Wurttemberg may be more interesting.  It is governed by an intuitively disparate coalition.  The Greens are currently the senior partner with the CDU. It is the first state that the Greens hold the premiership.  After years of cohabitation with the CDU on the national level, the SPD has seen their support flag, and the Greens may become the largest center-left party.  As odd as it may appear, the coalition in Baden-Wurttemberg is seen as a prototype for a possible coalition on the national level.  

The Netherlands goes to the polls as well in the middle of March.  The Dutch political parties are so fragmented that it took 225 days to form a government after the last elections. Public opinion polls suggest little change in party alignments is likely.   Prime Minister Rutte is likely to lead a center-right coalition to head up his fourth government.

The Bannockburn World Currency Index finished February at a three-week low.   The nearly 0.5% decline in February's last session matches the largest single-day pullback since last March. Only four currencies in the basket appreciated in February, sterling, the Canadian dollar, the Russian ruble, and the Australian dollar.  

The flat performance this year is consistent with our sense that the dollar is at the fulcrum of the reflation theme driving other capital markets.  Among the majors, sterling and the dollar-bloc currencies have been rewarded. Among the emerging markets in our index, the Russian ruble stands out with a 1.5% gain, bolstered by the commodity story, economic recovery, and high rates. Substantial fiscal expansion and market-friendly moves helped lift the Indian rupee before profit-taking at the end of February.  Strong South Korean exports helped blunt the impact of domestic and foreign portfolio investment outflows on the won.  

Year-to-date, the four worst-performing emerging market currencies are in Latam (Brazil real -6.9%, Argentine peso -6.3% Colombian peso -5.0%, and Mexican peso - 4.9%).  Turkey has been rewarded for its shift to more orthodox policies, including high-interest rates. With the broad selloff of emerging market currencies and a nearly 2% drop in February, the lira virtually flat so far this year.  The poor performance of emerging market currencies in general last month means that the modest 0.4% gain of the Taiwanese dollar puts it in a tie with the Chinese yuan (both up 0.75% year-to-date) at the top of the EM universe.  

Dollar:  The US dollar finished February on a firm note as the market is brought forward the likely timing of the first Fed hike to the end of 2022 from late 2023.  The policy-setting is still open spigot. The Federal Reserve is buying $80 bln of Treasuries and $40 bln of Agency MBS a month, and the FOMC meeting that concludes on March 17 will suggest no change is contemplated even as US growth prospects improve.  The lion's share of the $1.9 trillion fiscal stimulus package will be approved before the FOMC meeting.  In light of the market pulling the first rate hike into late 2022 from 2023, the Fed's rhetoric may change.  The rise in the long-end yield reflects a rise in inflation expectations more than real rates, as mediated by the breakevens (the difference between conventional and inflation-linked notes and bonds).  Even, the Federal Reserve's real yield index shows that the 10-year rate is still deeply negative (-0.70%) at the end of February.  This is up from the extremes (-1.10% last August), but well below the  0.15% that prevailed in Q4 19.  While the long-end of the curve has backed up, the short-end of the curve is soft. Short-dated bill yields are threatening to fall below zero as the Treasury Department reduces its cash holdings dramatically in the coming months, which floods the system with liquidity.  The two-year note yield slipped to a record low on February 11, below 10 bp, and finished the month near 14 bp.  

Euro:  The eurozone economy is contracting in Q1, but the outlook is constructive as the vaccine rollout picks up. The manufacturing sector is expanding, and services are not contracting as they did when the pandemic first struck. The selection of former ECB President Draghi as the 30th prime minister of Italy reduced perceived redenomination risks (a country leaving the eurozone).  Even as yields were rising recently, the cost of insuring against default fell.  The ECB meets on March 11, and the risk is that the staff cuts its near-term economic forecasts.  ECB President Lagarde will likely focus her on measuring financial conditions. The central bank's chief economist Lane has relied on four indicators, the overnight-index-swaps to the 10-year curve, money market rates, the exchange rate, and equity prices.  A couple of ECB Executive Board members have suggested that there is scope for another rate cut, if necessary.  The targeted long-term loan rate is below the minus 50 bp deposit rate, which has reduced the sting of negative rates.  In the first instance, we suspect the ECB would step up its bond purchases from the 17 bln to 20 bln euro pace.  Disbursements from the EU Recovery fund are until closer midyear.  Like in the US, the increase in Germany's nominal yields can be accounted for by rising inflation expectations, measured by the difference between the conventional yield and the inflation-linked security. Since early November, the 10-year Bund yield rose by about 36 bp while the break-even has risen 37 bp.  Real yields remain low.   The euro peaked in early January, and although it was firmer than we expected last month, we are not convinced that the corrective or consolidative phase is over.  We suspect the risk may still extend toward $1.18 before what we think is the underlying downtrend in the dollar resumes.  

 

(end of February 2021 indicative prices, previous in parentheses)

 

Spot: $1.2075  ($1.2135) 

Median Bloomberg One-month Forecast $1.2200 ($1.2145) 

One-month forward  $1.2085 ($1.2140)    One-month implied vol  6.8%  (5.7%)    

 

 

Yen:  The rise in US yields helped lift the dollar to a five-month high against the yen last month (~JPY106.70).  The yen is the weakest of the major currencies through February, off about 3.1% for the year. The Japanese economy appears to be contracting in Q1, but foreign demand, especially in Asia, is an important offset.  In 2020, Japan recorded a JPY3 trillion trade surplus compared with JPY382 bln in 2019.  Japan has been reported a trade deficit in January since 2010, but the JPY324 bln shortfall this past January was the smallest since the pattern began.  The Bank of Japan has been buying ETFs for a decade and holds around JPY47 trillion (~$445 bln).  It is the single largest owner of Japanese shares.  The Topix reached its best level since 1991, the cost-benefit, given the distortions of small-cap issues, some modification seems increasingly necessary.  Some detect a tactical shift recently that could also entail less frequent purchases but a larger average size. The rise in global bond yields has impacted Japan. The 30-year bond yield reached over 0.77%, the highest since late 2018, while and the 10-year matched its highest level (~0.18%), a five-year high.   The 10-year break-even has risen to nearly 18 bp after finishing last year near 3 bp. Some observers expect the BOJ to widen the range that the 10-year yield can trade, from 20 bp on either side of zero to 30 bp, under its yield curve control policy.  The central bank meets on March 19.    

 

Spot: JPY106.55 (JPY104.70)      

Median Bloomberg One-month Forecast JPY105.95 (JPY104.50)     

One-month forward JPY106.50 (JPY104.75)    One-month implied vol  7.0% (6.3%)  

 

 

Sterling:  The British pound has dramatically benefitted from the reflation meme and the vaccine rolling out. Since the end of October (18 weeks), sterling has fallen against in only three weeks, including the last week of February.  Over the span, it has appreciated by about 7.7%.  Also helping the currency was the market's acceptance that the Bank of England was not going to adopt a negative interest rate and instead may hike them by the end of next year. The 10-year Gilt has risen by about 55 bp since the end of October, while the 10-year breakeven increased by around 25 bp.  This suggests an increase in the real rate, unlike in Germany or the US.  Some BOE officials, like some Fed officials, see investor optimism in the rising yields.  However, the BOE chief economist warned that central banks may be complacent about inflation, and rates may have to rise to tame it.  This will likely underpin sterling, even in corrective phases.   Sterling is near its best level against the euro in a year, and this may also help minimize the losses against the dollar.    If sterling's appreciation on a trade-weighted basis, some official comments cannot be ruled out.  With the labor market still stressed, the furlough program in which some 20% of the employees participate is currently set to end on April 30.  Alongside this, the Chancellor of the Exchequer's budget on March 3 may provide other support for the hard-hit small and medium-sized businesses, which all told maybe 5%-7% of GDP.  Sunak is expected to signal the intention of bringing fiscal policy under control, and the UK's corporate tax rate of 19% is the lowest in the G7.  It is one of the areas that the Tories have not promised not to raise taxes.  

  

Spot: $1.3935 ($1.3710)   

Median Bloomberg One-month Forecast $1.3900 ($1.3695) 

One-month forward $1.3940 ($1.3715)   One-month implied vol 9.1% (7.8%)

  

 

Canadian Dollar: Last month and year-to-date, the Canadian dollar lagged behind the other dollar-bloc currencies' appreciation. Although its exports are weighted toward commodities, the positive impact may have been blunted by the Canadian dollar's greater sensitivity to the US NASDAQ.   The Bank of Canada does not see the economic slack being absorbed until 2023 and is committed to keeping rates low until inflation is sustainably at its 2% target. The current wage subsidy ceiling (75%) may be lowered in April but will continue at least through June.  The economy appears to be contracting in Q1, but a stronger second half is anticipated.  It may not regain pre-pandemic output levels until 2022.  Since the end of October, the 10-year bond yield has risen by about 75 bp, while the 10-year breakeven has increased by 68 bp.  The rise in inflation expectations may explain the full increase in nominal yields.  We suspect that the US dollar recorded an important low against the Canadian dollar in late-February and see room into the CAD1.2900-CAD1.3000 area in the coming weeks.  

 

Spot: CAD1.2740  (CAD 1.2780) 

Median Bloomberg One-month Forecast  CAD1.2730 (CAD1.2770)

One-month forward CAD1.2735 (CAD1.2800)    One-month implied vol  8.1%  (7.0%) 

 

 

Australian Dollar:  The macro-themes of reflation, higher commodity prices, and strong Asian, and especially, Chinese demand converge in Australia. Iron ore, coal, and liquified gas account for more than half of Australia's exports. Since the end of October, the Australian dollar has appreciated by around 14.5%, and by some measures of purchasing power parity, it is overvalued.  The OECD's PPP model has the Aussie when it is about $0.7700,  overvalued by around 13%.  The next important chart points are the 2017-2018 highs (~$0.8125-$0.8135), but we suspect an important high is in place and expect it to work its way lower toward the $0.7500 area in the coming weeks.  The Aussie has appreciated by nearly 9% against the Chinese yuan, its biggest trading partner. In addition to competitiveness, it also more broadly highlights the strategic dilemma. Its economic prosperity has been linked to China's growth, while the key to its security lies in Washington.   The upward pressure on global rates poses a challenge for the Reserve Bank of Australia that targets the three-year yield at 10 bp, the cash rate target in its expression of yield curve control.  It may need to expand its bond-buying to achieve its target when it meets on March 2 to bolster the credibility of its stance, with the three-year note above the target at the end of February despite having stepped up its purchases.    


Spot:  $0.7705 ($0.7645)       

Median Bloomberg One-Month Forecast $0.7705 ($0.7640)     

One-month forward  $0.7610 ($0.7650)     One-month implied vol 12.0%  (10.3%)   

 

 

Mexican Peso:  In the second half of last year, the Mexican peso appreciated by 15.5%, making it the second strongest emerging market currency after the South African rand.  The peso had fallen by about 17.7% in H1 20. Even before the pandemic, Mexico's economy was contracting.  The AMLO government eschews deficit-financed growth, putting more weight on monetary policy.  Banxico meets on March 25, and the deputy governor suggested that there may be scope for two more rate cuts, which the market took as a signal.  However, investors have turned cold toward the peso.  Rising interest rates, especially in the US, knock an important leg from underneath it.  The other two legs that the peso stood on were its trade surplus and strong worker remittances, and the best news of both are probably past.  The high rates, record trade surplus, and strong worker remittances overshadowed the government's less-than-friendly business policies. Mexico has been hard hit by the virus, slow to roll out the vaccine, reluctant to used fiscal policy to support incomes and demand.  The dollar finished February a little below MXN20.95, its highest close three months.  The risk in the coming weeks may extend toward MXN21.50.  

 

Spot: MXN20.8550 (MXN20.5750)  

Median Bloomberg One-Month Forecast  MXN20.6350 (MXN20.5050)  

One-month forward  MXN20.9335 (MXN20.5854)     One-month implied vol 17.1% (15.3%)

  


Chinese Yuan:  The yuan's 1.5% gain in January was halved by the 0.75% loss in February.  This change does not tell you that the dollar has been in a clear trading range against the yuan this year. The dollar traded between CNY6.4235 and CNY6.5150 in January and CNY6.43 and CNY46.49 in February. It is a closely managed currency.  We suspect the PBOC is willing to see some yuan weakness in the dollar stages a broad recovery in March as looks likely.  One of the popular investment themes had been the attractiveness of Chines bonds for the yield pick-up.  Yet, since the middle of November, China's premium has fallen from over 250 bp to around 175 in late February.  China's National People's Congress is scheduled for March 4-5.  It is one of the most important events in Chinese politics.  The 14th Five-Year plan will be approved, and other policy objectives will be announced.  It is about signaling and intentions.  Even with the dramatic decline in US and European shares in late February, China's CSI 300 Index underperformed with a small outright decrease compared to a 2.6% gain in the S&P 500 and a 2.3% increase in the Dow Jones Stoxx 600.  


Spot: CNY6.4735 (CNY6.4285)

Median Bloomberg One-month Forecast  CNY6.46800 (CNY6.4750) 

One-month forward CNY6.4955  (CNY6.4750)    One-month implied vol  5.2% (5.1%)




Disclaimer

Read More

Continue Reading

Government

Vaccine-skeptical mothers say bad health care experiences made them distrust the medical system

Vaccine skepticism, and the broader medical mistrust and far-reaching anxieties it reflects, is not just a fringe position in the 21st century.

Women's own negative medical experiences influence their vaccine decisions for their kids. AP Photo/Ted S. Warren

Why would a mother reject safe, potentially lifesaving vaccines for her child?

Popular writing on vaccine skepticism often denigrates white and middle-class mothers who reject some or all recommended vaccines as hysterical, misinformed, zealous or ignorant. Mainstream media and medical providers increasingly dismiss vaccine refusal as a hallmark of American fringe ideology, far-right radicalization or anti-intellectualism.

But vaccine skepticism, and the broader medical mistrust and far-reaching anxieties it reflects, is not just a fringe position.

Pediatric vaccination rates had already fallen sharply before the COVID-19 pandemic, ushering in the return of measles, mumps and chickenpox to the U.S. in 2019. Four years after the pandemic’s onset, a growing number of Americans doubt the safety, efficacy and necessity of routine vaccines. Childhood vaccination rates have declined substantially across the U.S., which public health officials attribute to a “spillover” effect from pandemic-related vaccine skepticism and blame for the recent measles outbreak. Almost half of American mothers rated the risk of side effects from the MMR vaccine as medium or high in a 2023 survey by Pew Research.

Recommended vaccines go through rigorous testing and evaluation, and the most infamous charges of vaccine-induced injury have been thoroughly debunked. How do so many mothers – primary caregivers and health care decision-makers for their families – become wary of U.S. health care and one of its most proven preventive technologies?

I’m a cultural anthropologist who studies the ways feelings and beliefs circulate in American society. To investigate what’s behind mothers’ vaccine skepticism, I interviewed vaccine-skeptical mothers about their perceptions of existing and novel vaccines. What they told me complicates sweeping and overly simplified portrayals of their misgivings by pointing to the U.S. health care system itself. The medical system’s failures and harms against women gave rise to their pervasive vaccine skepticism and generalized medical mistrust.

The seeds of women’s skepticism

I conducted this ethnographic research in Oregon from 2020 to 2021 with predominantly white mothers between the ages of 25 and 60. My findings reveal new insights about the origins of vaccine skepticism among this demographic. These women traced their distrust of vaccines, and of U.S. health care more generally, to ongoing and repeated instances of medical harm they experienced from childhood through childbirth.

girl sitting on exam table faces a doctor viewer can see from behind
A woman’s own childhood mistreatment by a doctor can shape her health care decisions for the next generation. FatCamera/E+ via Getty Images

As young girls in medical offices, they were touched without consent, yelled at, disbelieved or threatened. One mother, Susan, recalled her pediatrician abruptly lying her down and performing a rectal exam without her consent at the age of 12. Another mother, Luna, shared how a pediatrician once threatened to have her institutionalized when she voiced anxiety at a routine physical.

As women giving birth, they often felt managed, pressured or discounted. One mother, Meryl, told me, “I felt like I was coerced under distress into Pitocin and induction” during labor. Another mother, Hallie, shared, “I really battled with my provider” throughout the childbirth experience.

Together with the convoluted bureaucracy of for-profit health care, experiences of medical harm contributed to “one million little touch points of information,” in one mother’s phrase, that underscored the untrustworthiness and harmful effects of U.S. health care writ large.

A system that doesn’t serve them

Many mothers I interviewed rejected the premise that public health entities such as the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the Food and Drug Administration had their children’s best interests at heart. Instead, they tied childhood vaccination and the more recent development of COVID-19 vaccines to a bloated pharmaceutical industry and for-profit health care model. As one mother explained, “The FDA is not looking out for our health. They’re looking out for their wealth.”

After ongoing negative medical encounters, the women I interviewed lost trust not only in providers but the medical system. Frustrating experiences prompted them to “do their own research” in the name of bodily autonomy. Such research often included books, articles and podcasts deeply critical of vaccines, public health care and drug companies.

These materials, which have proliferated since 2020, cast light on past vaccine trials gone awry, broader histories of medical harm and abuse, the rapid growth of the recommended vaccine schedule in the late 20th century and the massive profits reaped from drug development and for-profit health care. They confirmed and hardened women’s suspicions about U.S. health care.

hands point to a handwritten vaccination record
The number of recommended childhood vaccines has increased over time. Mike Adaskaveg/MediaNews Group/Boston Herald via Getty Images

The stories these women told me add nuance to existing academic research into vaccine skepticism. Most studies have considered vaccine skepticism among primarily white and middle-class parents to be an outgrowth of today’s neoliberal parenting and intensive mothering. Researchers have theorized vaccine skepticism among white and well-off mothers to be an outcome of consumer health care and its emphasis on individual choice and risk reduction. Other researchers highlight vaccine skepticism as a collective identity that can provide mothers with a sense of belonging.

Seeing medical care as a threat to health

The perceptions mothers shared are far from isolated or fringe, and they are not unreasonable. Rather, they represent a growing population of Americans who hold the pervasive belief that U.S. health care harms more than it helps.

Data suggests that the number of Americans harmed in the course of treatment remains high, with incidents of medical error in the U.S. outnumbering those in peer countries, despite more money being spent per capita on health care. One 2023 study found that diagnostic error, one kind of medical error, accounted for 371,000 deaths and 424,000 permanent disabilities among Americans every year.

Studies reveal particularly high rates of medical error in the treatment of vulnerable communities, including women, people of color, disabled, poor, LGBTQ+ and gender-nonconforming individuals and the elderly. The number of U.S. women who have died because of pregnancy-related causes has increased substantially in recent years, with maternal death rates doubling between 1999 and 2019.

The prevalence of medical harm points to the relevance of philosopher Ivan Illich’s manifesto against the “disease of medical progress.” In his 1982 book “Medical Nemesis,” he insisted that rather than being incidental, harm flows inevitably from the structure of institutionalized and for-profit health care itself. Illich wrote, “The medical establishment has become a major threat to health,” and has created its own “epidemic” of iatrogenic illness – that is, illness caused by a physician or the health care system itself.

Four decades later, medical mistrust among Americans remains alarmingly high. Only 23% of Americans express high confidence in the medical system. The United States ranks 24th out of 29 peer high-income countries for the level of public trust in medical providers.

For people like the mothers I interviewed, who have experienced real or perceived harm at the hands of medical providers; have felt belittled, dismissed or disbelieved in a doctor’s office; or spent countless hours fighting to pay for, understand or use health benefits, skepticism and distrust are rational responses to lived experience. These attitudes do not emerge solely from ignorance, conspiracy thinking, far-right extremism or hysteria, but rather the historical and ongoing harms endemic to the U.S. health care system itself.

Johanna Richlin does not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organization that would benefit from this article, and has disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.

Read More

Continue Reading

Government

Is the National Guard a solution to school violence?

School board members in one Massachusetts district have called for the National Guard to address student misbehavior. Does their request have merit? A…

Published

on

By

Every now and then, an elected official will suggest bringing in the National Guard to deal with violence that seems out of control.

A city council member in Washington suggested doing so in 2023 to combat the city’s rising violence. So did a Pennsylvania representative concerned about violence in Philadelphia in 2022.

In February 2024, officials in Massachusetts requested the National Guard be deployed to a more unexpected location – to a high school.

Brockton High School has been struggling with student fights, drug use and disrespect toward staff. One school staffer said she was trampled by a crowd rushing to see a fight. Many teachers call in sick to work each day, leaving the school understaffed.

As a researcher who studies school discipline, I know Brockton’s situation is part of a national trend of principals and teachers who have been struggling to deal with perceived increases in student misbehavior since the pandemic.

A review of how the National Guard has been deployed to schools in the past shows the guard can provide service to schools in cases of exceptional need. Yet, doing so does not always end well.

How have schools used the National Guard before?

In 1957, the National Guard blocked nine Black students’ attempts to desegregate Central High School in Little Rock, Arkansas. While the governor claimed this was for safety, the National Guard effectively delayed desegregation of the school – as did the mobs of white individuals outside. Ironically, weeks later, the National Guard and the U.S. Army would enforce integration and the safety of the “Little Rock Nine” on orders from President Dwight Eisenhower.

Three men from the mob around Little Rock’s Central High School are driven from the area at bayonet-point by soldiers of the 101st Airborne Division on Sept. 25, 1957. The presence of the troops permitted the nine Black students to enter the school with only minor background incidents. Bettmann via Getty Images

One of the most tragic cases of the National Guard in an educational setting came in 1970 at Kent State University. The National Guard was brought to campus to respond to protests over American involvement in the Vietnam War. The guardsmen fatally shot four students.

In 2012, then-Sen. Barbara Boxer, a Democrat from California, proposed funding to use the National Guard to provide school security in the wake of the Sandy Hook school shooting. The bill was not passed.

More recently, the National Guard filled teacher shortages in New Mexico’s K-12 schools during the quarantines and sickness of the pandemic. While the idea did not catch on nationally, teachers and school personnel in New Mexico generally reported positive experiences.

Can the National Guard address school discipline?

The National Guard’s mission includes responding to domestic emergencies. Members of the guard are part-time service members who maintain civilian lives. Some are students themselves in colleges and universities. Does this mission and training position the National Guard to respond to incidents of student misbehavior and school violence?

On the one hand, New Mexico’s pandemic experience shows the National Guard could be a stopgap to staffing shortages in unusual circumstances. Similarly, the guards’ eventual role in ensuring student safety during school desegregation in Arkansas demonstrates their potential to address exceptional cases in schools, such as racially motivated mob violence. And, of course, many schools have had military personnel teaching and mentoring through Junior ROTC programs for years.

Those seeking to bring the National Guard to Brockton High School have made similar arguments. They note that staffing shortages have contributed to behavior problems.

One school board member stated: “I know that the first thought that comes to mind when you hear ‘National Guard’ is uniform and arms, and that’s not the case. They’re people like us. They’re educated. They’re trained, and we just need their assistance right now. … We need more staff to support our staff and help the students learn (and) have a safe environment.”

Yet, there are reasons to question whether calls for the National Guard are the best way to address school misconduct and behavior. First, the National Guard is a temporary measure that does little to address the underlying causes of student misbehavior and school violence.

Research has shown that students benefit from effective teaching, meaningful and sustained relationships with school personnel and positive school environments. Such educative and supportive environments have been linked to safer schools. National Guard members are not trained as educators or counselors and, as a temporary measure, would not remain in the school to establish durable relationships with students.

What is more, a military presence – particularly if uniformed or armed – may make students feel less welcome at school or escalate situations.

Schools have already seen an increase in militarization. For example, school police departments have gone so far as to acquire grenade launchers and mine-resistant armored vehicles.

Research has found that school police make students more likely to be suspended and to be arrested. Similarly, while a National Guard presence may address misbehavior temporarily, their presence could similarly result in students experiencing punitive or exclusionary responses to behavior.

Students deserve a solution other than the guard

School violence and disruptions are serious problems that can harm students. Unfortunately, schools and educators have increasingly viewed student misbehavior as a problem to be dealt with through suspensions and police involvement.

A number of people – from the NAACP to the local mayor and other members of the school board – have criticized Brockton’s request for the National Guard. Governor Maura Healey has said she will not deploy the guard to the school.

However, the case of Brockton High School points to real needs. Educators there, like in other schools nationally, are facing a tough situation and perceive a lack of support and resources.

Many schools need more teachers and staff. Students need access to mentors and counselors. With these resources, schools can better ensure educators are able to do their jobs without military intervention.

F. Chris Curran has received funding from the US Department of Justice, the Bureau of Justice Assistance, and the American Civil Liberties Union for work on school safety and discipline.

Read More

Continue Reading

Government

Chinese migration to US is nothing new – but the reasons for recent surge at Southern border are

A gloomier economic outlook in China and tightening state control have combined with the influence of social media in encouraging migration.

Published

on

By

Chinese migrants wait for a boat after having walked across the Darien Gap from Colombia to Panama. AP Photo/Natacha Pisarenko

The brief closure of the Darien Gap – a perilous 66-mile jungle journey linking South American and Central America – in February 2024 temporarily halted one of the Western Hemisphere’s busiest migration routes. It also highlighted its importance to a small but growing group of people that depend on that pass to make it to the U.S.: Chinese migrants.

While a record 2.5 million migrants were detained at the United States’ southwestern land border in 2023, only about 37,000 were from China.

I’m a scholar of migration and China. What I find most remarkable in these figures is the speed with which the number of Chinese migrants is growing. Nearly 10 times as many Chinese migrants crossed the southern border in 2023 as in 2022. In December 2023 alone, U.S. Border Patrol officials reported encounters with about 6,000 Chinese migrants, in contrast to the 900 they reported a year earlier in December 2022.

The dramatic uptick is the result of a confluence of factors that range from a slowing Chinese economy and tightening political control by President Xi Jinping to the easy access to online information on Chinese social media about how to make the trip.

Middle-class migrants

Journalists reporting from the border have generalized that Chinese migrants come largely from the self-employed middle class. They are not rich enough to use education or work opportunities as a means of entry, but they can afford to fly across the world.

According to a report from Reuters, in many cases those attempting to make the crossing are small-business owners who saw irreparable damage to their primary or sole source of income due to China’s “zero COVID” policies. The migrants are women, men and, in some cases, children accompanying parents from all over China.

Chinese nationals have long made the journey to the United States seeking economic opportunity or political freedom. Based on recent media interviews with migrants coming by way of South America and the U.S.’s southern border, the increase in numbers seems driven by two factors.

First, the most common path for immigration for Chinese nationals is through a student visa or H1-B visa for skilled workers. But travel restrictions during the early months of the pandemic temporarily stalled migration from China. Immigrant visas are out of reach for many Chinese nationals without family or vocation-based preferences, and tourist visas require a personal interview with a U.S. consulate to gauge the likelihood of the traveler returning to China.

Social media tutorials

Second, with the legal routes for immigration difficult to follow, social media accounts have outlined alternatives for Chinese who feel an urgent need to emigrate. Accounts on Douyin, the TikTok clone available in mainland China, document locations open for visa-free travel by Chinese passport holders. On TikTok itself, migrants could find information on where to cross the border, as well as information about transportation and smugglers, commonly known as “snakeheads,” who are experienced with bringing migrants on the journey north.

With virtual private networks, immigrants can also gather information from U.S. apps such as X, YouTube, Facebook and other sites that are otherwise blocked by Chinese censors.

Inspired by social media posts that both offer practical guides and celebrate the journey, thousands of Chinese migrants have been flying to Ecuador, which allows visa-free travel for Chinese citizens, and then making their way over land to the U.S.-Mexican border.

This journey involves trekking through the Darien Gap, which despite its notoriety as a dangerous crossing has become an increasingly common route for migrants from Venezuela, Colombia and all over the world.

In addition to information about crossing the Darien Gap, these social media posts highlight the best places to cross the border. This has led to a large share of Chinese asylum seekers following the same path to Mexico’s Baja California to cross the border near San Diego.

Chinese migration to US is nothing new

The rapid increase in numbers and the ease of accessing information via social media on their smartphones are new innovations. But there is a longer history of Chinese migration to the U.S. over the southern border – and at the hands of smugglers.

From 1882 to 1943, the United States banned all immigration by male Chinese laborers and most Chinese women. A combination of economic competition and racist concerns about Chinese culture and assimilability ensured that the Chinese would be the first ethnic group to enter the United States illegally.

With legal options for arrival eliminated, some Chinese migrants took advantage of the relative ease of movement between the U.S. and Mexico during those years. While some migrants adopted Mexican names and spoke enough Spanish to pass as migrant workers, others used borrowed identities or paperwork from Chinese people with a right of entry, like U.S.-born citizens. Similarly to what we are seeing today, it was middle- and working-class Chinese who more frequently turned to illegal means. Those with money and education were able to circumvent the law by arriving as students or members of the merchant class, both exceptions to the exclusion law.

Though these Chinese exclusion laws officially ended in 1943, restrictions on migration from Asia continued until Congress revised U.S. immigration law in the Hart-Celler Act in 1965. New priorities for immigrant visas that stressed vocational skills as well as family reunification, alongside then Chinese leader Deng Xiaoping’s policies of “reform and opening,” helped many Chinese migrants make their way legally to the U.S. in the 1980s and 1990s.

Even after the restrictive immigration laws ended, Chinese migrants without the education or family connections often needed for U.S. visas continued to take dangerous routes with the help of “snakeheads.”

One notorious incident occurred in 1993, when a ship called the Golden Venture ran aground near New York, resulting in the drowning deaths of 10 Chinese migrants and the arrest and conviction of the snakeheads attempting to smuggle hundreds of Chinese migrants into the United States.

Existing tensions

Though there is plenty of precedent for Chinese migrants arriving without documentation, Chinese asylum seekers have better odds of success than many of the other migrants making the dangerous journey north.

An estimated 55% of Chinese asylum seekers are successful in making their claims, often citing political oppression and lack of religious freedom in China as motivations. By contrast, only 29% of Venezuelans seeking asylum in the U.S. have their claim granted, and the number is even lower for Colombians, at 19%.

The new halt on the migratory highway from the south has affected thousands of new migrants seeking refuge in the U.S. But the mix of push factors from their home country and encouragement on social media means that Chinese migrants will continue to seek routes to America.

And with both migration and the perceived threat from China likely to be features of the upcoming U.S. election, there is a risk that increased Chinese migration could become politicized, leaning further into existing tensions between Washington and Beijing.

Meredith Oyen does not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organization that would benefit from this article, and has disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.

Read More

Continue Reading

Trending