Connect with us

JP Morgan Warns Crowded Trading And Vaccine Euphoria Are Big Markets Threats

JPMorgan Warns Crowded Trades And Euphoric Consensus Are The Biggest Threats For Markets

Tyler Durden

Sun, 12/06/2020 – 09:55

Last month, during our 13-F postmortem, we showed that just as hedge funds had gone all-in stocks, or…

Published

on

This article was originally published by ZeroHedge.

JPMorgan Warns Crowded Trades And Euphoric Consensus Are The Biggest Threats For Markets Tyler Durden Sun, 12/06/2020 - 09:55

Last month, during our 13-F postmortem, we showed that just as hedge funds had gone all-in stocks, or rather a handful of momentum stocks, resulting in record gross and net hedge fund leverage...

... which also meant a record drop in S&P short interest as any remaining bears have been ritualistically slaughtered in the last few months ...

... hedge funds did what they normally do, which is to organize low lit "idea dinners" and agree to all jump in the same handful of stocks while at the same time shorting a different group of stocks (after all they have to at least pretend to hedge otherwise bye bye 2 and 20). Unfortunately, that was a terrible decision in Q3 when the most popular longs jumped but the most popular shorts soared twice as much...

... leading to another quarter of major losses for most hedge funds in Q3. It proved to be an even worse decision to pile into the same handful of momentum VIPs on Nov 9 when the Pfizer vaccine led to a record reversal in momentum stocks, and catastrophic losses for what until then had been the best strategy of the year.

At the same time, the unprecedented short squeeze continued steamrolling over the vast majority of hedge funds, but much to the delight of our readers especially those who read our Nov 20 article "Here Are The 50 Most Popular And 50 Most Shorted Hedge Funds Stocks", in which we said that "as usual, our advice is to go long the most hated names and short the most popular ones - a strategy that has generated alpha without fail for the past 7 years, ever since we first recommended it back in 2013." Well, after we wrote that, the most shorted stocks have soared another 12%, outperforming the S&P 3x, confirming that the best strategy on Wall Street is to do the opposite of what Wall Street consensus is doing.

even though it should be painfully obvious by now, what the above data show is that hedge fund position crowding is now at or near all time highs...

... simply because in a world where just 5 stocks have generated the vast majority of returns (and profits), hedge funds don't really have a choice but to crowd.

So in light of this recent development, where there are effectively no original ideas left in the hedge fund world, and where beta-chasing crowding has emerged as the only alternative to a centrally-planned market, the Chief Investment Officer of NN Investment Partners said what we have been saying for years, namely that one of the biggest risks to the bullish equity market consensus for next year is that investors are all leaning the same way and market overcrowding could stall the rally early on.

Valentijn van Nieuwenhuijzen, who helps to manage NN IP’s 295 billion euros ($356.09 billion) of assets, told Reuters Global Investment Outlook Summit, 2021 that he broadly agrees with the consensus on overweight in equity and risk assets going into 2021 - which ironically is also the joke - as he merely contributed to the very same euphoria crowding he is warning against, admitting that "there could be problems during the year."

"We are strong believers in the evolution of markets and behavior of our peers is something we monitor very closely,” he said. "If we think consensus in thinking is changing into a large consensus of behavior, with everyone rolling into equities and the same type of strategies, that could create more volatile markets somewhere late Q1 or early Q2."

Well Valentijn, if not ours, then take Goldman's word for it: crowding has rarely been greater, and not just among hedge funds who are all chasing the same handful of growth outperfomers, but also on Wall Street, where consensus forecasts are almost uniformly for another gain of 10% in the S&P500 next year as COVID-19 vaccines are rolled out and the global economy recovers while massive monetary and fiscal policy supports persist.

Then again, even if things turn south, like an obedient, Pavlovian dog, Valentijn falls back to the old maxim that central banks will always be there to save trend-followers like him: “Central banks will be super committed,” he said. "With massive output gaps, I doubt that over a 3-5 year horizon there will be any change in the picture of debt levels or inflation."

He then continued to spout the same consensus tripe that is the basis behind all the market crowding he is warning against: stay away from bonds, tech stocks are at risk from continued reflation rotation, emerging markets are the bomb (more here).

* * *

And while there was absolutely no signal in all of Valentijn's "noise", his observation that crowding is becoming a major issue - as we have been saying for years - was the basis of the latest note from JPM's Nick Panigirtzoglou, authord of JPMorgan's popular Flows and Liquidity newsletter, in which he took warns that crowding, or rather as he puts it "consensus" could be the biggest risk in the coming year.

Summarizing his client conversations over the past two weeks regarding the 2021 outlook, Panigirtzoglou writes that a clear consensus has emerged:

  • a bullish view on equities overall into 2021,
  • OW non-US vs. US equities;
  • OW value and cyclical equity sectors over growth oriented sectors;
  • OW EM assets;
  • short the dollar;
  • short duration and steepeners in US and Euro rates;
  • long credit including corporate, EM and peripheral sovereign credit;
  • long commodities including copper to play China’s cyclical upturn and oil to play a global cyclical upturn;
  • long gold; and long bitcoin as short dollar proxies.

He goes on to say that "the last time we recall such strong consensus was at the end of 2017/beginning of 2018 within our discussions about the 2018 outlook. In fact, the consensus trading themes at the time regarding the 2018 outlook were very similar to the current consensus themes." As a reminder, what happened then is the January meltup which culminated in everyone selling vol, resulting in a short-circuit in the VIX complex, with all inverse VIX ETFs imploding spectacularly in Feb 2018, leading to a brief but painful market correction.

Drawing parallels to the last time we saw such unbridled euphoria three years ago, the JPM quant then warns that "unfortunately, the consensus view rarely plays out in its entirety as 2018 reminds us" adding that "for asset allocators, what is thus important is scale exposures to avoid an overly concentrated portfolio."

Yet which of the above nine consensus trading themes should one have greater - and less - exposure to? One way of choosing among them is by limiting exposure to the most crowded ones. While we will let readers do their own homework on most of the above themes, this is what the JPM strategist writes about the crowded "long equities" position as we enter 2021:

  • Near-term, we find pockets of position overextension that make this theme rather crowded and prone to correction into January. First, momentum traders are very long equities at the moment across most major equity indices. This is shown in Figure 1 which depicts the average of our short and long lookback period momentum signals for the S&P500, Nasdaq, Eustostocc50 and Nikkei indices. Most of them are close to the 1.5 std evs threshold we typically associate with a high risk of mean reversion flows kicking in. In fact, our momentum signal for Eurostoxx50 has already started decaying after exceeding the 1.5 stdevs threshold in November. A similar backdrop was seen at the beginning of June this year ahead of the June FOMC meeting, and further back during the beginning of this year and the beginning of 2018. The December 16th FOMC is only ten days away and the risk is once again  that the Fed disappoints equity investors.
  • Second, multi asset investors such as balanced funds and risk parity funds are rather OW equities (Figure 2) creating the risk of negative rebalancing flows into year end. We had previously estimated in our November 20th publication that balanced mutual funds, a $7tr universe, would have to sell around $160bn of equities globally before year end to revert to their target 60:40 allocation. Similarly, the strong equity market rally since the beginning of November has given rise to additional $150bn of potential equity selling into the end of December by those pension fund entities that tend to rebalance on a quarterly basis.

To summarize the above warnings, the "Long equities" theme is not only the most crowded it has ever been among hedge fund sporting record gross and net leverage, but also extremely crowded tactically with elevated positioning by momentum traders and rebalancing flows by balanced mutual funds and pension funds all of which poses "downside risk into year end."

But since one can't get away from the herd - even when one is warning about the risks of running with the herd (if one wants to make money by selling ideas to the herd) - JPM caveats that this time is different to the euphoria beginning of 2018 when we last saw such massive, one-sided positioning, and so JPM writes that its "medium term equity positioning indicator based on the implied equity allocation of non-bank investors globally stands at average rather than overbought levels."

Which means that, just like Morgan Stanley, JPMorgan's advice is to mind the sharp imminent correction but to promptly buy the dip, i.e., "any equity correction in the near term would represent a buying opportunity as in our opinion we are only in the middle of the current bull market."

Considering that we are now in the phase where there is no stopping the money helicopter that is central bank balance sheets...

... JPMorgan is probably right that any dips from this point on have to bought ahead of the coming hyperinflation at least until such time as fiat currencies and conventional economics finally lose all credibility, which will mark the merciful end of this Sovietization of what was once called the "market."

Read More

Continue Reading

Uncategorized

Homes listed for sale in early June sell for $7,700 more

New Zillow research suggests the spring home shopping season may see a second wave this summer if mortgage rates fall
The post Homes listed for sale in…

Published

on

  • A Zillow analysis of 2023 home sales finds homes listed in the first two weeks of June sold for 2.3% more. 
  • The best time to list a home for sale is a month later than it was in 2019, likely driven by mortgage rates.
  • The best time to list can be as early as the second half of February in San Francisco, and as late as the first half of July in New York and Philadelphia. 

Spring home sellers looking to maximize their sale price may want to wait it out and list their home for sale in the first half of June. A new Zillow® analysis of 2023 sales found that homes listed in the first two weeks of June sold for 2.3% more, a $7,700 boost on a typical U.S. home.  

The best time to list consistently had been early May in the years leading up to the pandemic. The shift to June suggests mortgage rates are strongly influencing demand on top of the usual seasonality that brings buyers to the market in the spring. This home-shopping season is poised to follow a similar pattern as that in 2023, with the potential for a second wave if the Federal Reserve lowers interest rates midyear or later. 

The 2.3% sale price premium registered last June followed the first spring in more than 15 years with mortgage rates over 6% on a 30-year fixed-rate loan. The high rates put home buyers on the back foot, and as rates continued upward through May, they were still reassessing and less likely to bid boldly. In June, however, rates pulled back a little from 6.79% to 6.67%, which likely presented an opportunity for determined buyers heading into summer. More buyers understood their market position and could afford to transact, boosting competition and sale prices.

The old logic was that sellers could earn a premium by listing in late spring, when search activity hit its peak. Now, with persistently low inventory, mortgage rate fluctuations make their own seasonality. First-time home buyers who are on the edge of qualifying for a home loan may dip in and out of the market, depending on what’s happening with rates. It is almost certain the Federal Reserve will push back any interest-rate cuts to mid-2024 at the earliest. If mortgage rates follow, that could bring another surge of buyers later this year.

Mortgage rates have been impacting affordability and sale prices since they began rising rapidly two years ago. In 2022, sellers nationwide saw the highest sale premium when they listed their home in late March, right before rates barreled past 5% and continued climbing. 

Zillow’s research finds the best time to list can vary widely by metropolitan area. In 2023, it was as early as the second half of February in San Francisco, and as late as the first half of July in New York. Thirty of the top 35 largest metro areas saw for-sale listings command the highest sale prices between May and early July last year. 

Zillow also found a wide range in the sale price premiums associated with homes listed during those peak periods. At the hottest time of the year in San Jose, homes sold for 5.5% more, a $88,000 boost on a typical home. Meanwhile, homes in San Antonio sold for 1.9% more during that same time period.  

 

Metropolitan Area Best Time to List Price Premium Dollar Boost
United States First half of June 2.3% $7,700
New York, NY First half of July 2.4% $15,500
Los Angeles, CA First half of May 4.1% $39,300
Chicago, IL First half of June 2.8% $8,800
Dallas, TX First half of June 2.5% $9,200
Houston, TX Second half of April 2.0% $6,200
Washington, DC Second half of June 2.2% $12,700
Philadelphia, PA First half of July 2.4% $8,200
Miami, FL First half of June 2.3% $12,900
Atlanta, GA Second half of June 2.3% $8,700
Boston, MA Second half of May 3.5% $23,600
Phoenix, AZ First half of June 3.2% $14,700
San Francisco, CA Second half of February 4.2% $50,300
Riverside, CA First half of May 2.7% $15,600
Detroit, MI First half of July 3.3% $7,900
Seattle, WA First half of June 4.3% $31,500
Minneapolis, MN Second half of May 3.7% $13,400
San Diego, CA Second half of April 3.1% $29,600
Tampa, FL Second half of June 2.1% $8,000
Denver, CO Second half of May 2.9% $16,900
Baltimore, MD First half of July 2.2% $8,200
St. Louis, MO First half of June 2.9% $7,000
Orlando, FL First half of June 2.2% $8,700
Charlotte, NC Second half of May 3.0% $11,000
San Antonio, TX First half of June 1.9% $5,400
Portland, OR Second half of April 2.6% $14,300
Sacramento, CA First half of June 3.2% $17,900
Pittsburgh, PA Second half of June 2.3% $4,700
Cincinnati, OH Second half of April 2.7% $7,500
Austin, TX Second half of May 2.8% $12,600
Las Vegas, NV First half of June 3.4% $14,600
Kansas City, MO Second half of May 2.5% $7,300
Columbus, OH Second half of June 3.3% $10,400
Indianapolis, IN First half of July 3.0% $8,100
Cleveland, OH First half of July  3.4% $7,400
San Jose, CA First half of June 5.5% $88,400

 

The post Homes listed for sale in early June sell for $7,700 more appeared first on Zillow Research.

Read More

Continue Reading

Government

Survey Shows Declining Concerns Among Americans About COVID-19

Survey Shows Declining Concerns Among Americans About COVID-19

A new survey reveals that only 20% of Americans view covid-19 as "a major threat"…

Published

on

Survey Shows Declining Concerns Among Americans About COVID-19

A new survey reveals that only 20% of Americans view covid-19 as "a major threat" to the health of the US population - a sharp decline from a high of 67% in July 2020.

(SARMDY/Shutterstock)

What's more, the Pew Research Center survey conducted from Feb. 7 to Feb. 11 showed that just 10% of Americans are concerned that they will  catch the disease and require hospitalization.

"This data represents a low ebb of public concern about the virus that reached its height in the summer and fall of 2020, when as many as two-thirds of Americans viewed COVID-19 as a major threat to public health," reads the report, which was published March 7.

According to the survey, half of the participants understand the significance of researchers and healthcare providers in understanding and treating long COVID - however 27% of participants consider this issue less important, while 22% of Americans are unaware of long COVID.

What's more, while Democrats were far more worried than Republicans in the past, that gap has narrowed significantly.

"In the pandemic’s first year, Democrats were routinely about 40 points more likely than Republicans to view the coronavirus as a major threat to the health of the U.S. population. This gap has waned as overall levels of concern have fallen," reads the report.

More via the Epoch Times;

The survey found that three in ten Democrats under 50 have received an updated COVID-19 vaccine, compared with 66 percent of Democrats ages 65 and older.

Moreover, 66 percent of Democrats ages 65 and older have received the updated COVID-19 vaccine, while only 24 percent of Republicans ages 65 and older have done so.

“This 42-point partisan gap is much wider now than at other points since the start of the outbreak. For instance, in August 2021, 93 percent of older Democrats and 78 percent of older Republicans said they had received all the shots needed to be fully vaccinated (a 15-point gap),” it noted.

COVID-19 No Longer an Emergency

The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) recently issued its updated recommendations for the virus, which no longer require people to stay home for five days after testing positive for COVID-19.

The updated guidance recommends that people who contracted a respiratory virus stay home, and they can resume normal activities when their symptoms improve overall and their fever subsides for 24 hours without medication.

“We still must use the commonsense solutions we know work to protect ourselves and others from serious illness from respiratory viruses, this includes vaccination, treatment, and staying home when we get sick,” CDC director Dr. Mandy Cohen said in a statement.

The CDC said that while the virus remains a threat, it is now less likely to cause severe illness because of widespread immunity and improved tools to prevent and treat the disease.

Importantly, states and countries that have already adjusted recommended isolation times have not seen increased hospitalizations or deaths related to COVID-19,” it stated.

The federal government suspended its free at-home COVID-19 test program on March 8, according to a website set up by the government, following a decrease in COVID-19-related hospitalizations.

According to the CDC, hospitalization rates for COVID-19 and influenza diseases remain “elevated” but are decreasing in some parts of the United States.

Tyler Durden Sun, 03/10/2024 - 22:45

Read More

Continue Reading

International

Rand Paul Teases Senate GOP Leader Run – Musk Says “I Would Support”

Rand Paul Teases Senate GOP Leader Run – Musk Says "I Would Support"

Republican Kentucky Senator Rand Paul on Friday hinted that he may jump…

Published

on

Rand Paul Teases Senate GOP Leader Run - Musk Says "I Would Support"

Republican Kentucky Senator Rand Paul on Friday hinted that he may jump into the race to become the next Senate GOP leader, and Elon Musk was quick to support the idea. Republicans must find a successor for periodically malfunctioning Mitch McConnell, who recently announced he'll step down in November, though intending to keep his Senate seat until his term ends in January 2027, when he'd be within weeks of turning 86. 

So far, the announced field consists of two quintessential establishment types: John Cornyn of Texas and John Thune of South Dakota. While John Barrasso's name had been thrown around as one of "The Three Johns" considered top contenders, the Wyoming senator on Tuesday said he'll instead seek the number two slot as party whip. 

Paul used X to tease his potential bid for the position which -- if the GOP takes back the upper chamber in November -- could graduate from Minority Leader to Majority Leader. He started by telling his 5.1 million followers he'd had lots of people asking him about his interest in running...

...then followed up with a poll in which he predictably annihilated Cornyn and Thune, taking a 96% share as of Friday night, with the other two below 2% each. 

Elon Musk was quick to back the idea of Paul as GOP leader, while daring Cornyn and Thune to follow Paul's lead by throwing their names out for consideration by the Twitter-verse X-verse. 

Paul has been a stalwart opponent of security-state mass surveillance, foreign interventionism -- to include shoveling billions of dollars into the proxy war in Ukraine -- and out-of-control spending in general. He demonstrated the latter passion on the Senate floor this week as he ridiculed the latest kick-the-can spending package:   

In February, Paul used Senate rules to force his colleagues into a grueling Super Bowl weekend of votes, as he worked to derail a $95 billion foreign aid bill. "I think we should stay here as long as it takes,” said Paul. “If it takes a week or a month, I’ll force them to stay here to discuss why they think the border of Ukraine is more important than the US border.”

Don't expect a Majority Leader Paul to ditch the filibuster -- he's been a hardy user of the legislative delay tactic. In 2013, he spoke for 13 hours to fight the nomination of John Brennan as CIA director. In 2015, he orated for 10-and-a-half-hours to oppose extension of the Patriot Act

Rand Paul amid his 10 1/2 hour filibuster in 2015

Among the general public, Paul is probably best known as Capitol Hill's chief tormentor of Dr. Anthony Fauci, who was director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Disease during the Covid-19 pandemic. Paul says the evidence indicates the virus emerged from China's Wuhan Institute of Virology. He's accused Fauci and other members of the US government public health apparatus of evading questions about their funding of the Chinese lab's "gain of function" research, which takes natural viruses and morphs them into something more dangerous. Paul has pointedly said that Fauci committed perjury in congressional hearings and that he belongs in jail "without question."   

Musk is neither the only nor the first noteworthy figure to back Paul for party leader. Just hours after McConnell announced his upcoming step-down from leadership, independent 2024 presidential candidate Robert F. Kennedy, Jr voiced his support: 

In a testament to the extent to which the establishment recoils at the libertarian-minded Paul, mainstream media outlets -- which have been quick to report on other developments in the majority leader race -- pretended not to notice that Paul had signaled his interest in the job. More than 24 hours after Paul's test-the-waters tweet-fest began, not a single major outlet had brought it to the attention of their audience. 

That may be his strongest endorsement yet. 

Tyler Durden Sun, 03/10/2024 - 20:25

Read More

Continue Reading

Trending