Connect with us

Uncategorized

How to Beat the S&P 500 With This Clever Strategy

Jack Bogle led an investing revolution when he introduced index funds. He believed the average investor couldn’t beat the market over time. All he or…

Published

on

Jack Bogle led an investing revolution when he introduced index funds.

He believed the average investor couldn’t beat the market over time. All he or she could hope to do was match the market’s performance as closely as possible.

While we laud the change he brought to financial markets…

…we believe he is dead wrong.

In fact, we can PROVE that the average investor can beat the market with a simple options strategy…

…a strategy Bryan Perry employs in his latest project, The Eight-Month Millionaire.

Options Two Ways

Options come in two flavors: puts and calls.

We have the choice of either buying or selling either type.

Today, we’re going to focus on selling put contracts.

Quite simply, when you sell a put contract, you give someone the right to sell shares to you at a given price until the expiration date.

You’re essentially acting like their insurance in case a stock goes lower.

That’s why the payout diagram for selling a put option looks like this:

Why would anyone do this?

Because when you sell someone a put contract, you make them pay for that right.

The amount they pay is what’s known as the option’s premium (A.K.A. an option’s price).

You get to keep this NO MATTER WHAT — remember this because we’ll bring it up later.

An option’s premium is made up of two components: intrinsic and extrinsic value.

Intrinsic value is what you get if the option is immediately exercised in the open market.

Extrinsic value is the remainder of the option price that goes to zero at expiration.

Here’s an example.

  • AAPL trades at $130.
  • I sell someone a put option with a $135 strike price.
  • That put option costs them $7.00.

Since the person could sell AAPL shares to me at $135, per the contract, they could buy shares of AAPL on the open market for $130, immediately turn around and sell them to me for $135, and gain $5.00.

That leaves the $7.00 – $5.00 = $2.00 as extrinsic value.

We’re going to focus on extrinsic value.

The extrinsic value of an option changes based on how far away the stock’s current price is from the strike price and forms a bell curve:

Here are the key points:

  • When a put option’s strike price is below or equal to a stock’s current price, the option has no intrinsic value. It only has extrinsic value.
  • Extrinsic value is at its highest when the stock’s current price equals the strike price.

While this may be a bit of rehashing for some of you, and maybe a bit wonky for others, it’s critical you understand the “why.”

Otherwise, it would be like teaching a driver that a car’s accelerator makes the car move forward without explaining that it does that by using gas. While you’d have fun for a while, you’d quickly find yourself on an empty tank stuck on the highway.

The Simple Options Strategy

Here’s where the rubber meets the road.

The Chicago Board of Exchange (CBOE) publishes an index called the ‘Put Write’ index.

Quite simply, this index measures the gains of selling an at-the-money put — where the price of the S&P 500 is equal to the strike price of the put.

Here’s how it works:

  • Sell an at-the-money put each month.
  • You set aside cash to cover the cost of that put (the cash is invested in T-bills)
  • At expiration, you accept any losses or gains.
  • You then repeat the process and sell a new at-the-money put.

Here’s an example:

  • On Jan. 1, the S&P 500 trades at $4,400.
  • I sell a put for $100 that expires on Jan. 31 with a $4,400 strike price.

Since you get to keep that option premium, as long as the S&P 500 doesn’t fall by more than the amount you sell the put for, you make money.

In the example, that means that as long as the S&P 500 stays above $4,400 – $100 = $4,300, you make money.

Anything below $4,300 and you incur losses.

Why might someone do this?

For starters, you’re setting aside money that you might otherwise use to purchase the same number of shares of the S&P 500, which is 100 shares per options contract.

Note: You can do this on the SPY ETF or the XSP Index, which are one-tenth the size of the S&P 500.

But more importantly, the odds of making money by selling options in general are statistically higher than buying them.

And as promised, the graph below shows the strategy itself does beat the S&P 500 over time:

Source: TradingView

The green line shows the percent return for this strategy, while the orange line is the S&P 500.

Now, we know what you’re thinking.

Yes, if you change when you start, this can change which outperforms the other. Nor does this assume reinvested dividends.

However, the PutWrite Index also has less volatility.

Taking It a Step Further

If you wanted to make things simple for yourself, there are exchange-traded funds (ETFs) and mutual funds that track the PutWrite Index.

But what should be abundantly clear is that even a strategy as simple as this can be remarkably powerful.

So, imagine what happens when you layer on the knowledge of a multi-decade options trader…

…who understands not only how to invest in stocks…

…but exploit inefficiencies in the options market.

At that point, you’re only limited by how active you want to be.

If this sounds like a path worth exploring, then we encourage you to CLICK HERE to explore Bryan Perry’s 8-month Millionaire Program.

The post How to Beat the S&P 500 With This Clever Strategy appeared first on Stock Investor.

Read More

Continue Reading

Uncategorized

Apartment permits are back to recession lows. Will mortgage rates follow?

If housing leads us into a recession in the near future, that means mortgage rates have stayed too high for too long.

Published

on

In Tuesday’s report, the 5-unit housing permits data hit the same levels we saw in the COVID-19 recession. Once the backlog of apartments is finished, those jobs will be at risk, which traditionally means mortgage rates would fall soon after, as they have in previous economic cycles.

However, this is happening while single-family permits are still rising as the rate of builder buy-downs and the backlog of single-family homes push single-family permits and starts higher. It is a tale of two markets — something I brought up on CNBC earlier this year to explain why this trend matters with housing starts data because the two marketplaces are heading in opposite directions.

The question is: Will the uptick in single-family permits keep mortgage rates higher than usual? As long as jobless claims stay low, the falling 5-unit apartment permit data might not lead to lower mortgage rates as it has in previous cycles.

From Census: Building Permits: Privately‐owned housing units authorized by building permits in February were at a seasonally adjusted annual rate of 1,518,000. This is 1.9 percent above the revised January rate of 1,489,000 and 2.4 percent above the February 2023 rate of 1,482,000.

When people say housing leads us in and out of a recession, it is a valid premise and that is why people carefully track housing permits. However, this housing cycle has been unique. Unfortunately, many people who have tracked this housing cycle are still stuck on 2008, believing that what happened during COVID-19 was rampant demand speculation that would lead to a massive supply of homes once home sales crashed. This would mean the builders couldn’t sell more new homes or have housing permits rise.

Housing permits, starts and new home sales were falling for a while, and in 2022, the data looked recessionary. However, new home sales were never near the 2005 peak, and the builders found a workable bottom in sales by paying down mortgage rates to boost demand. The first level of job loss recessionary data has been averted for now. Below is the chart of the building permits.



On the other hand, the apartment boom and bust has already happened. Permits are already back to the levels of the COVID-19 recession and have legs to move lower. Traditionally, when this data line gets this negative, a recession isn’t far off. But, as you can see in the chart below, there’s a big gap between the housing permit data for single-family and five units. Looking at this chart, the recession would only happen after single-family and 5-unit permits fall together, not when we have a gap like we see today.

From Census: Housing completions: Privately‐owned housing completions in February were at a seasonally adjusted annual rate of 1,729,000.

As we can see in the chart below, we had a solid month of housing completions. This was driven by 5-unit completions, which have been in the works for a while now. Also, this month’s report show a weather impact as progress in building was held up due to bad weather. However, the good news is that more supply of rental units will mean the fight against rent inflation will be positive as more supply is the best way to deal with inflation. In time, that is also good news for mortgage rates.



Housing Starts: Privately‐owned housing starts in February were at a seasonally adjusted annual rate of 1,521,000. This is 10.7 percent (±14.2 percent)* above the revised January estimate of 1,374,000 and is 5.9 percent (±10.0 percent)* above the February 2023 rate of 1,436,000.

Housing starts data beat to the upside, but the real story is that the marketplace has diverged into two different directions. The apartment boom is over and permits are heading below the COVID-19 recession, but as long as the builders can keep rates low enough to sell more new homes, single-family permits and starts can slowly move forward.

If we lose the single-family marketplace, expect the chart below to look like it always does before a recession — meaning residential construction workers lose their jobs. For now, the apartment construction workers are at the most risk once they finish the backlog of apartments under construction.

Overall, the housing starts beat to the upside. Still, the report’s internals show a marketplace with early recessionary data lines, which traditionally mean mortgage rates should go lower soon. If housing leads us into a recession in the near future, that means mortgage rates have stayed too high for too long and restrictive policy by the Fed created a recession as we have seen in previous economic cycles.

The builders have been paying down rates to keep construction workers employed, but if rates go higher, it will get more and more challenging to do this because not all builders have the capacity to buy down rates. Last year, we saw what 8% mortgage rates did to new home sales; they dropped before rates fell. So, this is something to keep track of, especially with a critical Federal Reserve meeting this week.

Read More

Continue Reading

Uncategorized

One more airline cracks down on lounge crowding in a way you won’t like

Qantas Airways is increasing the price of accessing its network of lounges by as much as 17%.

Published

on

Over the last two years, multiple airlines have dealt with crowding in their lounges. While they are designed as a luxury experience for a small subset of travelers, high numbers of people taking a trip post-pandemic as well as the different ways they are able to gain access through status or certain credit cards made it difficult for some airlines to keep up with keeping foods stocked, common areas clean and having enough staff to serve bar drinks at the rate that customers expect them.

In the fall of 2023, Delta Air Lines  (DAL)  caught serious traveler outcry after announcing that it was cracking down on crowding by raising how much one needs to spend for lounge access and limiting the number of times one can enter those lounges.

Related: Competitors pushed Delta to backtrack on its lounge and loyalty program changes

Some airlines saw the outcry with Delta as their chance to reassure customers that they would not raise their fees while others waited for the storm to pass to quietly implement their own increases.

A photograph captures a Qantas Airways lounge in Sydney, Australia.

Shutterstock

This is how much more you'll have to pay for Qantas lounge access

Australia's flagship carrier Qantas Airways  (QUBSF)  is the latest airline to announce that it would raise the cost accessing the 24 lounges across the country as well as the 600 international lounges available at airports across the world through partner airlines.

More Travel:

Unlike other airlines which grant access primarily after reaching frequent flyer status, Qantas also sells it through a membership — starting from April 18, 2024, prices will rise from $600 Australian dollars ($392 USD)  to $699 AUD ($456 USD) for one year, $1,100 ($718 USD) to $1,299 ($848 USD) for two years and $2,000 AUD ($1,304) to lock in the rate for four years.

Those signing up for lounge access for the first time also currently pay a joining fee of $99 AUD ($65 USD) that will rise to $129 AUD ($85 USD).

The airline also allows customers to purchase their membership with Qantas Points they collect through frequent travel; the membership fees are also being raised by the equivalent amount in points in what adds up to as much as 17% — from 308,000 to 399,900 to lock in access for four years.

Airline says hikes will 'cover cost increases passed on from suppliers'

"This is the first time the Qantas Club membership fees have increased in seven years and will help cover cost increases passed on from a range of suppliers over that time," a Qantas spokesperson confirmed to Simple Flying. "This follows a reduction in the membership fees for several years during the pandemic."

The spokesperson said the gains from the increases will go both towards making up for inflation-related costs and keeping existing lounges looking modern by updating features like furniture and décor.

While the price increases also do not apply for those who earned lounge access through frequent flyer status or change what it takes to earn that status, Qantas is also introducing even steeper increases for those renewing a membership or adding additional features such as spouse and partner memberships.

In some cases, the cost of these features will nearly double from what members are paying now.

Read More

Continue Reading

Uncategorized

Star Wars icon gives his support to Disney, Bob Iger

Disney shareholders have a huge decision to make on April 3.

Published

on

Disney's  (DIS)  been facing some headwinds up top, but its leadership just got backing from one of the company's more prominent investors.

Star Wars creator George Lucas put out of statement in support of the company's current leadership team, led by CEO Bob Iger, ahead of the April 3 shareholders meeting which will see investors vote on the company's 12-member board.

"Creating magic is not for amateurs," Lucas said in a statement. "When I sold Lucasfilm just over a decade ago, I was delighted to become a Disney shareholder because of my long-time admiration for its iconic brand and Bob Iger’s leadership. When Bob recently returned to the company during a difficult time, I was relieved. No one knows Disney better. I remain a significant shareholder because I have full faith and confidence in the power of Disney and Bob’s track record of driving long-term value. I have voted all of my shares for Disney’s 12 directors and urge other shareholders to do the same."

Related: Disney stands against Nelson Peltz as leadership succession plan heats up

Lucasfilm was acquired by Disney for $4 billion in 2012 — notably under the first term of Iger. He received over 37 million in shares of Disney during the acquisition.

Lucas' statement seems to be an attempt to push investors away from the criticism coming from The Trian Partners investment group, led by Nelson Peltz. The group, owns about $3 million in shares of the media giant, is pushing two candidates for positions on the board, which are Peltz and former Disney CFO Jay Rasulo.

HOLLYWOOD, CALIFORNIA - JUNE 14: George Lucas attends the Los Angeles Premiere of LucasFilms' "Indiana Jones and the Dial of Destiny" at Dolby Theatre on June 14, 2023 in Hollywood, California. (Photo by Axelle/Bauer-Griffin/FilmMagic)

Axelle/Bauer-Griffin/Getty Images

Peltz and Co. have called out a pair of Disney directors — Michael Froman and Maria Elena Lagomasino — for their lack of experience in the media space.

Related: Women's basketball is gaining ground, but is March Madness ready to rival the men's game?

Blackwells Capital is also pushing three of its candidates to take seats during the early April shareholder meeting, though Reuters has reported that the firm has been supportive of the company's current direction.

Disney has struggled in recent years amid the changes in media and the effects of the pandemic — which triggered the return of Iger at the helm in late 2022. After going through mass layoffs in the spring of 2023 and focusing on key growth brands, the company has seen a steady recovery with its stock up over 25% year-to-date and around 40% for the last six months.

Related: Veteran fund manager picks favorite stocks for 2024

Read More

Continue Reading

Trending