Connect with us

Uncategorized

Housing Market Tracker: Mortgage rates drop almost 1%

Mortgage rates started last week at 6.44% and fell to a low of 6.16%, then ended the week at 6.34%. Expect another volatile pricing week.

Published

on

The housing market welcomed the news of lower mortgage rates last week after four reports showed that the labor market isn’t as tight as it seems and that the fear of 1970s-entrenched inflation was a lousy narrative. The 10-year yield finally broke below a critical technical level it had difficulty breaking for many months and we had a very small increase in inventory.

Here’s a quick rundown of the last week:

  • Mortgage rates fell last week as the 10-year yield broke lower for the first time since the significant rise in rates last year. 
  • Active inventory rose by 823 single-family homes and new listing data is trending at all-time lows.
  • Purchase applications fell 4% weekly, breaking a four-week streak of positive growth and are still down -35% year over year.

The 10-year yield and mortgage rates

An epic battle for the 10-year yield finally ended last week when it broke below the significant level of 3.42%-3.37% — the Gandalf line in the sand. After the jobs report on Friday, the bond yield retraced up to that critical line, but I tend not to put any weight on a holiday trading day. As you can see in the chart below, that red line was tough to break below, but it finally happened. This week’s trading in the bond market will be exciting with the upcoming inflation data.



In my 2023 forecast, I said that if the economy stays firm, the 10-year yield range should be between 3.21% and 4.25%, equating to 5.75% to 7.25% mortgage rates. If the economy gets weaker and we see a noticeable rise in jobless claims, the 10-year yield should go as low as 2.73%, translating to 5.25% mortgage rates.

This assumes the spreads between the 10-year yield and the 30-year stay wide, as the mortgage-backed securities market is still very stressed. 

The banking crisis has put the entire year into a new variable spin as short-term rates now forecast rate cuts happening sooner than the Fed wants. However, everything looks right on the long end of the bond market, as jobless claims have been rising lately but not at my crucial level of 323,000 on the four-week moving average yet. If short term and long term rates keep falling with weaker economic data, it will force the Fed to cut rates faster than it originally wanted to.

The four-week moving average is running at 237,500, shown below on the chart.



Last Friday, I wrote about the jobs report and how it should be evident to anyone now, especially the Federal Reserve, that the fear of 1970s entrenched inflation was simply a joke. During the hottest labor market in history, wage growth was falling year-over-year, not spiraling out of control.

Mortgage rates started last week at 6.44% and fell to a low of 6.16%, then ended the week at 6.34%. So for all the drama we have had this year, the 10-year yield has held its range even with a national banking crisis. Now, we have enough data to see that the labor market isn’t as tight as it seems. With the CPI inflation data and retail sales this week, we could see another volatile pricing week, depending on the data.

Weekly housing inventory

Looking at the Altos Research data from last week, the big question is: Have we seen the seasonal bottom in Inventory? I’m crossing my fingers that we may have finally reached the bottom. Housing inventory had only a tiny gain last week, but I am hopeful that April is the month we see the seasonal inventory increase. 

  • Weekly inventory change (March 31 – April 7): Inventory rose from 410,028 to 410,851
  • Same week last year  (April 1-April 8): Rose from 252,820 to 258,264
  • The bottom for 2022 was 240,194

As you can see in the chart below, we are far from what a normal inventory channel looks like, and it’s been hard getting inventory back to pre-COVID-19 levels.

Mortgage rates in the previous economic expansion ranged between 3.25%-5%, and inventory had slowly been moving lower and lower. Last year we had the biggest mortgage rate spike in history, and it did create more inventory for us, but it couldn’t get us back to 2019 levels.

Last year, the weekly seasonal inventory bottom was set on March 4; we still need to confirm the weekly bottom in 2023. This year looks similar to 2021 data, which bottomed on April 9, so April could be the turning point.

The NAR data going back decades shows how difficult it’s been to get back to anything normal on the active listing side. In 2007, when sales were down big, total active listings peaked at over 4 million. Today, even though sales were trending at 2007 levels, we are at 980,000 total active listings per the last existing home sales. Current housing Inventory is still not suitable for a healthy housing market. 

New listing data rose last week but is still trending at all-time lows in 2023. However, the fact that it is back on its seasonal growth trend is a good sign. The last thing the housing market needs is for new listing data to decline, so the growth we saw last week is a plus. I can’t stress enough how happy I was to see this data line.

Here are some weekly numbers to see the difference in new listings from past years over the same week. One thing to notice is that new listing data in 2022 was higher than in 2021. This isn’t the case, of course, this year, but if there is one data line I want to surpass 2022 levels, it is new listing data. 

  • 2021: 61,263
  • 2022: 63,746
  • 2023: 55,591

Compare weekly new listing data to previous years:

  • 2015: 86,847
  • 2016: 85,296
  • 2017: 85,765

As you can see from the data above, homeowners aren’t rushing to sell out of panic since they’re in solid shape as the unemployment rate is still historically low. While U.S. households are employed and living a comfortable life with their low total housing cost, the last thing on their mind is giving up that comfort for the unknown.

We have natural sellers every year in the U.S., but now U.S. homeowners are sitting pretty with their low fixed debt cost. At the same time, their wages are growing faster than normal during an inflationary period. As you can see below, year-over-year wage growth is cooling down but still above what we saw in the previous decade.

Purchase application data

Purchase application data has been one of the most improved housing market data lines since Nov. 9, 2022. This explains why the most recent existing home sales report had one of the most significant month-to-month sales prints ever. We have had three consecutive rising pending home sales reports as well.

Purchase application data fell 4% weekly in the last report, breaking a four-week positive streak. The index is down -35% year over year, which is a reminder that year-over-year comps will get easier, especially in the year’s second half. It will be interesting to see if lower mortgage rates will move the data much in the next report.

The purchase application data reports have been wild when mortgage rates have gone up or down. Traditionally, we wouldn’t have this volatility in this data line, but 2022 was a historic dive. When mortgage rates went from 5.99% to 7.10%, we had three negative prints, bringing this index to levels last seen in 1995.

However, as mortgage rates have fallen almost one percent from that 7.10% level, we have seen four out of the last five prints be positive. For 2023, looking at the data line during the vital seasonal period, we have had seven positive prints versus five negative prints. 

Remember, this data line looks out 30-90 days before it hits the sales data. Also, the seasonality of this data line is almost over. I typically put more weight on this data line from the second week of January to the first week of May since total volumes traditionally fall after May.

The week ahead for inflation and mortgage rates

It’s inflation week with two inflation reports. The first is the all-important CPI report, which will show that the lower year-over-year trend in inflation data continues this week. Last September when the CPI report was coming out, CNBC asked me to talk about inflation data, and my take was that we would have a positive story in 2023 as the growth rate of rent inflation will fade.

This is important because without rent inflation booming, it’s hard for inflation levels to stay high. It’s better for mortgage rates when rent inflation slows down as it will take the growth rate if inflation down with it, and mortgage rates head higher when the growth rate of inflation falls. This is happening this year; the year-over-year inflation growth rate is falling and will fall more in the following report. Read about why mortgage rates aren’t higher here.

Of course, now it’s well known that shelter inflation on the CPI report lags badly, so the numbers we see this week are still not reality.

This week we also have the Producer Price Index inflation report and we will have retail sales on Friday. Now retail sales are going to be interesting because some of the credit growth that we have seen — which keeps the economy expanding — has cooled a tad, so it will be an excellent test to see if we see some slowing down in retail sales.

And of course, all eyes are on the bond market. As I recently talked about on CNBC, the U.S. housing market revolves around the 10-year yield and what drives that up and down. We shall see how the economic data impacts the bond market and mortgage rates. With the Gandalf line breaking and the labor market starting to show some softening, every report will be more and more critical.

Read More

Continue Reading

Uncategorized

February Employment Situation

By Paul Gomme and Peter Rupert The establishment data from the BLS showed a 275,000 increase in payroll employment for February, outpacing the 230,000…

Published

on

By Paul Gomme and Peter Rupert

The establishment data from the BLS showed a 275,000 increase in payroll employment for February, outpacing the 230,000 average over the previous 12 months. The payroll data for January and December were revised down by a total of 167,000. The private sector added 223,000 new jobs, the largest gain since May of last year.

Temporary help services employment continues a steep decline after a sharp post-pandemic rise.

Average hours of work increased from 34.2 to 34.3. The increase, along with the 223,000 private employment increase led to a hefty increase in total hours of 5.6% at an annualized rate, also the largest increase since May of last year.

The establishment report, once again, beat “expectations;” the WSJ survey of economists was 198,000. Other than the downward revisions, mentioned above, another bit of negative news was a smallish increase in wage growth, from $34.52 to $34.57.

The household survey shows that the labor force increased 150,000, a drop in employment of 184,000 and an increase in the number of unemployed persons of 334,000. The labor force participation rate held steady at 62.5, the employment to population ratio decreased from 60.2 to 60.1 and the unemployment rate increased from 3.66 to 3.86. Remember that the unemployment rate is the number of unemployed relative to the labor force (the number employed plus the number unemployed). Consequently, the unemployment rate can go up if the number of unemployed rises holding fixed the labor force, or if the labor force shrinks holding the number unemployed unchanged. An increase in the unemployment rate is not necessarily a bad thing: it may reflect a strong labor market drawing “marginally attached” individuals from outside the labor force. Indeed, there was a 96,000 decline in those workers.

Earlier in the week, the BLS announced JOLTS (Job Openings and Labor Turnover Survey) data for January. There isn’t much to report here as the job openings changed little at 8.9 million, the number of hires and total separations were little changed at 5.7 million and 5.3 million, respectively.

As has been the case for the last couple of years, the number of job openings remains higher than the number of unemployed persons.

Also earlier in the week the BLS announced that productivity increased 3.2% in the 4th quarter with output rising 3.5% and hours of work rising 0.3%.

The bottom line is that the labor market continues its surprisingly (to some) strong performance, once again proving stronger than many had expected. This strength makes it difficult to justify any interest rate cuts soon, particularly given the recent inflation spike.

Read More

Continue Reading

Uncategorized

Mortgage rates fall as labor market normalizes

Jobless claims show an expanding economy. We will only be in a recession once jobless claims exceed 323,000 on a four-week moving average.

Published

on

Everyone was waiting to see if this week’s jobs report would send mortgage rates higher, which is what happened last month. Instead, the 10-year yield had a muted response after the headline number beat estimates, but we have negative job revisions from previous months. The Federal Reserve’s fear of wage growth spiraling out of control hasn’t materialized for over two years now and the unemployment rate ticked up to 3.9%. For now, we can say the labor market isn’t tight anymore, but it’s also not breaking.

The key labor data line in this expansion is the weekly jobless claims report. Jobless claims show an expanding economy that has not lost jobs yet. We will only be in a recession once jobless claims exceed 323,000 on a four-week moving average.

From the Fed: In the week ended March 2, initial claims for unemployment insurance benefits were flat, at 217,000. The four-week moving average declined slightly by 750, to 212,250


Below is an explanation of how we got here with the labor market, which all started during COVID-19.

1. I wrote the COVID-19 recovery model on April 7, 2020, and retired it on Dec. 9, 2020. By that time, the upfront recovery phase was done, and I needed to model out when we would get the jobs lost back.

2. Early in the labor market recovery, when we saw weaker job reports, I doubled and tripled down on my assertion that job openings would get to 10 million in this recovery. Job openings rose as high as to 12 million and are currently over 9 million. Even with the massive miss on a job report in May 2021, I didn’t waver.

Currently, the jobs openings, quit percentage and hires data are below pre-COVID-19 levels, which means the labor market isn’t as tight as it once was, and this is why the employment cost index has been slowing data to move along the quits percentage.  

2-US_Job_Quits_Rate-1-2

3. I wrote that we should get back all the jobs lost to COVID-19 by September of 2022. At the time this would be a speedy labor market recovery, and it happened on schedule, too

Total employment data

4. This is the key one for right now: If COVID-19 hadn’t happened, we would have between 157 million and 159 million jobs today, which would have been in line with the job growth rate in February 2020. Today, we are at 157,808,000. This is important because job growth should be cooling down now. We are more in line with where the labor market should be when averaging 140K-165K monthly. So for now, the fact that we aren’t trending between 140K-165K means we still have a bit more recovery kick left before we get down to those levels. 




From BLS: Total nonfarm payroll employment rose by 275,000 in February, and the unemployment rate increased to 3.9 percent, the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics reported today. Job gains occurred in health care, in government, in food services and drinking places, in social assistance, and in transportation and warehousing.

Here are the jobs that were created and lost in the previous month:

IMG_5092

In this jobs report, the unemployment rate for education levels looks like this:

  • Less than a high school diploma: 6.1%
  • High school graduate and no college: 4.2%
  • Some college or associate degree: 3.1%
  • Bachelor’s degree or higher: 2.2%
IMG_5093_320f22

Today’s report has continued the trend of the labor data beating my expectations, only because I am looking for the jobs data to slow down to a level of 140K-165K, which hasn’t happened yet. I wouldn’t categorize the labor market as being tight anymore because of the quits ratio and the hires data in the job openings report. This also shows itself in the employment cost index as well. These are key data lines for the Fed and the reason we are going to see three rate cuts this year.

Read More

Continue Reading

Uncategorized

Inside The Most Ridiculous Jobs Report In History: Record 1.2 Million Immigrant Jobs Added In One Month

Inside The Most Ridiculous Jobs Report In History: Record 1.2 Million Immigrant Jobs Added In One Month

Last month we though that the January…

Published

on

Inside The Most Ridiculous Jobs Report In History: Record 1.2 Million Immigrant Jobs Added In One Month

Last month we though that the January jobs report was the "most ridiculous in recent history" but, boy, were we wrong because this morning the Biden department of goalseeked propaganda (aka BLS) published the February jobs report, and holy crap was that something else. Even Goebbels would blush. 

What happened? Let's take a closer look.

On the surface, it was (almost) another blockbuster jobs report, certainly one which nobody expected, or rather just one bank out of 76 expected. Starting at the top, the BLS reported that in February the US unexpectedly added 275K jobs, with just one research analyst (from Dai-Ichi Research) expecting a higher number.

Some context: after last month's record 4-sigma beat, today's print was "only" 3 sigma higher than estimates. Needless to say, two multiple sigma beats in a row used to only happen in the USSR... and now in the US, apparently.

Before we go any further, a quick note on what last month we said was "the most ridiculous jobs report in recent history": it appears the BLS read our comments and decided to stop beclowing itself. It did that by slashing last month's ridiculous print by over a third, and revising what was originally reported as a massive 353K beat to just 229K,  a 124K revision, which was the biggest one-month negative revision in two years!

Of course, that does not mean that this month's jobs print won't be revised lower: it will be, and not just that month but every other month until the November election because that's the only tool left in the Biden admin's box: pretend the economic and jobs are strong, then revise them sharply lower the next month, something we pointed out first last summer and which has not failed to disappoint once.

To be fair, not every aspect of the jobs report was stellar (after all, the BLS had to give it some vague credibility). Take the unemployment rate, after flatlining between 3.4% and 3.8% for two years - and thus denying expectations from Sahm's Rule that a recession may have already started - in February the unemployment rate unexpectedly jumped to 3.9%, the highest since February 2022 (with Black unemployment spiking by 0.3% to 5.6%, an indicator which the Biden admin will quickly slam as widespread economic racism or something).

And then there were average hourly earnings, which after surging 0.6% MoM in January (since revised to 0.5%) and spooking markets that wage growth is so hot, the Fed will have no choice but to delay cuts, in February the number tumbled to just 0.1%, the lowest in two years...

... for one simple reason: last month's average wage surge had nothing to do with actual wages, and everything to do with the BLS estimate of hours worked (which is the denominator in the average wage calculation) which last month tumbled to just 34.1 (we were led to believe) the lowest since the covid pandemic...

... but has since been revised higher while the February print rose even more, to 34.3, hence why the latest average wage data was once again a product not of wages going up, but of how long Americans worked in any weekly period, in this case higher from 34.1 to 34.3, an increase which has a major impact on the average calculation.

While the above data points were examples of some latent weakness in the latest report, perhaps meant to give it a sheen of veracity, it was everything else in the report that was a problem starting with the BLS's latest choice of seasonal adjustments (after last month's wholesale revision), which have gone from merely laughable to full clownshow, as the following comparison between the monthly change in BLS and ADP payrolls shows. The trend is clear: the Biden admin numbers are now clearly rising even as the impartial ADP (which directly logs employment numbers at the company level and is far more accurate), shows an accelerating slowdown.

But it's more than just the Biden admin hanging its "success" on seasonal adjustments: when one digs deeper inside the jobs report, all sorts of ugly things emerge... such as the growing unprecedented divergence between the Establishment (payrolls) survey and much more accurate Household (actual employment) survey. To wit, while in January the BLS claims 275K payrolls were added, the Household survey found that the number of actually employed workers dropped for the third straight month (and 4 in the past 5), this time by 184K (from 161.152K to 160.968K).

This means that while the Payrolls series hits new all time highs every month since December 2020 (when according to the BLS the US had its last month of payrolls losses), the level of Employment has not budged in the past year. Worse, as shown in the chart below, such a gaping divergence has opened between the two series in the past 4 years, that the number of Employed workers would need to soar by 9 million (!) to catch up to what Payrolls claims is the employment situation.

There's more: shifting from a quantitative to a qualitative assessment, reveals just how ugly the composition of "new jobs" has been. Consider this: the BLS reports that in February 2024, the US had 132.9 million full-time jobs and 27.9 million part-time jobs. Well, that's great... until you look back one year and find that in February 2023 the US had 133.2 million full-time jobs, or more than it does one year later! And yes, all the job growth since then has been in part-time jobs, which have increased by 921K since February 2023 (from 27.020 million to 27.941 million).

Here is a summary of the labor composition in the past year: all the new jobs have been part-time jobs!

But wait there's even more, because now that the primary season is over and we enter the heart of election season and political talking points will be thrown around left and right, especially in the context of the immigration crisis created intentionally by the Biden administration which is hoping to import millions of new Democratic voters (maybe the US can hold the presidential election in Honduras or Guatemala, after all it is their citizens that will be illegally casting the key votes in November), what we find is that in February, the number of native-born workers tumbled again, sliding by a massive 560K to just 129.807 million. Add to this the December data, and we get a near-record 2.4 million plunge in native-born workers in just the past 3 months (only the covid crash was worse)!

The offset? A record 1.2 million foreign-born (read immigrants, both legal and illegal but mostly illegal) workers added in February!

Said otherwise, not only has all job creation in the past 6 years has been exclusively for foreign-born workers...

Source: St Louis Fed FRED Native Born and Foreign Born

... but there has been zero job-creation for native born workers since June 2018!

This is a huge issue - especially at a time of an illegal alien flood at the southwest border...

... and is about to become a huge political scandal, because once the inevitable recession finally hits, there will be millions of furious unemployed Americans demanding a more accurate explanation for what happened - i.e., the illegal immigration floodgates that were opened by the Biden admin.

Which is also why Biden's handlers will do everything in their power to insure there is no official recession before November... and why after the election is over, all economic hell will finally break loose. Until then, however, expect the jobs numbers to get even more ridiculous.

Tyler Durden Fri, 03/08/2024 - 13:30

Read More

Continue Reading

Trending