Connect with us

Futures Rebound From Cap Gains Tax Selloff

Futures Rebound From Cap Gains Tax Selloff

US equity futures rebounded Friday following Thursday’s 1% selloff as investors digested a proposal for higher capital gains taxes and realized that i) it is nothing new compared to previous media…

Published

on

Futures Rebound From Cap Gains Tax Selloff

US equity futures rebounded Friday following Thursday's 1% selloff as investors digested a proposal for higher capital gains taxes and realized that i) it is nothing new compared to previous media reports and ii) the most likely outcome is a compromise tax rate (Goldman expects a final number no higher than 28%).  Still, both the S&P 500 and Dow are on course for weekly declines, after four straight weeks of gains. At 730 a.m. ET, Dow e-minis were up 38 points, or 0.11%, S&P 500 e-minis were up 9 points, or 0.22%, and Nasdaq 100 e-minis were up 18.5 points, or 0.14%.

Some key premarket moves:

  • Cryptocurrency and blockchain-related stocks including Riot Blockchain and Marathon Digital dropped 6.6% and 7.1% after bitcoin tumbled overnight below $50,000 on fears plans to raise capital gains taxes would curb investment in digital assets. Bitcoin was last trading just above $50K.
  • Intel shares fall 2.7% in U.S. premarket trading. The chipmaker’s 1Q update shows a drop in data-center revenue that offset strong PC chip sales. Analysts are divided on the results with some seeing the data-center slump as a blip, but others less convinced it is so.
  • Oil companies, mainly Chevron Corp, Marathon Petroleum, Exxon Mobil Corp and Occidental Petroleum, gained between 0.2% and 1.1% as oil prices rose.

On Thursday, Bloomberg sparked a selloff after it reported that Biden’s administration is seeking an increase in the capital gains tax to near 40% for wealthy individuals, almost double the current rate.

“The devil is always going to be in the detail,” said Ned Rumpeltin, European head of currency strategy at TD Securities, adding that the Democrats’ narrow majority could make the proposals hard to pass. Goldman agreed, and said that the compromise rate would be 28% and that the proposal would most likely be effected on Jan 1, 2022.

“We don’t think it derails the equity market recovery,” said Nupur Gupta, portfolio manager at Eastspring Investments, said of the tax proposal on Bloomberg TV. “Equity sentiment does appear to be stretched, which is why any negative news that you get can lead to a consolidation in markets in the short term.”

The pan-European STOXX 600 dropped 0.4% amid a mixed batch of earnings. and was on course for a 1% weekly drop, with a surge in global coronavirus cases also weighing. Carnival shares dropped as much as 4.4% in London after Morgan Stanley flagged caution on cruise lines. Swedish telecom Telia Co. also declined despite first-quarter results in line with forecasts.

The euro zone economy will grow more slowly this year than earlier thought and a temporary gain in inflation is likely to exceed a previous projection, a European Central Bank survey showed on Friday, a day after the bank left policy unchanged. However, IHS Markit’s flash Composite Purchasing Managers’ Index for the euro zone, seen as a good guide to economic health, rose to a nine-month high of 53.7 in April, confounding expectations in a Reuters poll for a dip to 52.8. Anything above 50 indicates growth. The US PMI data is due out at 945am ET.

“The euro zone has enjoyed a record manufacturing boom this month as the continent sees its early stages of the recovery efforts reaping rewards,” said Sun Global Investments CEO Mihir Kapadia in a client note. “We could expect some hiccups along the way, but sentiment should remain higher for some time.”

Here are some of the biggest European movers today:

  • FirstGroup shares rise as much as 19%, the most in five months, after the U.K. transport firm sells its North American student and transit units for $4.6 billion and says it expects FY21 earnings to exceed previous expectations.
  • Tod’s gains as much as 16% after LVMH boosts its stake in the Italian shoemaker to 10%, a move that’s likely to reignite takeover speculation on the stock, according to Jefferies.
  • SEB climbs as much as 8% to their highest in more than three years after the French home- appliances maker reported 1Q sales that beat consensus expectations, prompting a Societe Generale upgrade.
  • Wartsila rises as much as 7.8%, extending a surge after Thursday’s first- quarter report showed orders beating estimates.
  • Dometic advances as much as 6.5% after 1Q organic revenue growth of 22% was slighter better than expected, the main surprise being the company’s record margin, according to Jefferies.
  • Moncler falls as much as 7.1%, the most since March 2020, after 1Q results. RBC highlights that revenue recovery at the Italian maker of puffer jackets is good, but says the company is “not firing on all cylinders” compared to several peers that exceeded expectations.
  • Carnival Plc drops as much as 4.4% in London, the worst performer in Europe’s Stoxx 600 Travel & Leisure Index, after Morgan Stanley stays cautious on cruise lines despite improving newsflow.

Asian stocks were set for their worst weekly loss in a month as the region’s virus cases surged and a U.S. tax proposal hurt sentiment. Thai shares were the biggest decliners in Asia on Friday, with the SET Index down 0.9% as the country became the latest to report an unprecedented daily surge in Covid cases. Elsewhere, the Topix index closed 0.4% lower as Japan is set to declare a state of emergency in Tokyo, Osaka and two other prefectures from Sunday. Japan's weakness was offset by Chinese stocks, which notched the biggest weekly gain since they peaked at a 13-year high in mid-February. The benchmark CSI 300 index closed 0.9% higher on Friday, taking this week’s rally to 3.4%. Gains were driven by shares of companies that reported big jumps in first-quarter earnings. The MSCI Asia Pacific Index erased losses of as much as 0.5% on Friday to climb 0.3%. Information technology shares gained, while materials slumped. The regional gauge is on pace to fall 0.3% this week. Stephen Innes, chief global market strategist with Axicorp Financial Services wrote in a note that the biggest problem from the much talked-about U.S. tax proposal “might be a near-term liquidity drain as active traders and hedge funds pull back on a high-frequency activity to reevaluate strategy.”

India’s Sensex, the benchmark equity index, completed a third consecutive week of decline as a deadly wave of coronavirus infections raised concerns over business recovery amid lockdown-like curbs. The S&P BSE Sensex fell 0.4% to 47,878.45 in Mumbai, taking its weekly drop to 2%. The NSE Nifty 50 Index also declined by a similar magnitude. Both measures capped their longest run of weekly losses since May 22. “Domestic equities do not look to be inspiring at the moment,” said Binod Modi, head of strategy at Reliance Securities Ltd. “The sharp rise in Covid-19 cases across the country and enhanced mobility restrictions imposed by a number of states are expected to remain as key overhangs for the market.” The Sensex has retreated more than 8% from its recent peak on Feb. 15, nearing the 10% loss threshold viewed as a technical correction. India added a record 332,730 cases in the last 24 hours, taking the total number of cases to 16.26 million, the second-highest in the world. Fourteen of the 19 sector sub-indexes compiled by BSE Ltd. fell, led by a gauge of telecom companies

In rates, the 10Y TSY yield was steady at 1.55% about 1.3bp higher on the day, while long-end underperformance steepens 5s30s spread by ~1bp. Germany’s 10-year government bond yield, the benchmark of the euro area, was also flat. Treasury yields were cheaper by nearly 2bp at long-end of the curve after paring Asia-session declines. Bunds outperform by 2.5bp, gilts by 2bp; in U.K., bond sale plans were cut by more than expected after the budget deficit undershot official forecasts. Weakness in regional bonds during Asia session put additional upside pressure on yields as U.S. stock futures recovered some of Thursday’s losses. Treasury 5- and 10-year yields are headed for third straight weekly decline, 30-year for fifth straight, having benefited over past month from an array of technical factors.

In FX, the Bloomberg Dollar Spot Index fell again as its G-10 peers rallied led by risk-sensitive currencies. The yen was little changed after climbing to its highest level in seven weeks in the Asia session amid haven demand as Japan is set to declare a new state of emergency in some areas amid a surge in virus cases. The euro advanced from the beginning of the European session and got an extra boost after preliminary French manufacturing and services PMIs came in higher than expected, signaling a faster economic recovery; German bonds reacted to the data by giving up early gains, before rebounding. The pound rose, breaking a three-day losing streak, after better-than-expected retail sales for March and high- frequency data showed a continued uptick in spending; gilts briefly erased early gains posted on the DMO reducing this year’s debt sales.

China’s yuan posted its biggest weekly gain since January against the dollar. The Chinese currency also jumped the most in seven weeks against a basket of its trading partners. USD/CNY little changed at 6.4919; poised to fall 0.5% this week, most since Jan. 31. The Bloomberg CFETS RMB Index Tracker steady at 96.78, up 0.4% this week, most since March 5. “We expect CFETS strengthening to resume,” Citigroup strategists including Dirk Willer write in a note, adding that “we keep a bullish bias on CNY.”

In commodities, oil prices were steady, with support from the European economic recovery countered by persisting coronavirus concerns as infections surged to record levels in India. US crude edged up 0.1% to $61.50 a barrel and global benchmark Brent crude was flat at $65.35 per barrel. Spot gold was little changed at $1,785 per ounce but was still set for a weekly rise on soft Treasury yields and a subdued dollar

Bitcoin briefly dropped as low as $48,000, its lowest level in nearly seven weeks, before recovering some ground to trade back over $50,000. Ethereum was trading at $2,300 after dropping as low as $2,100.

With the first-quarter corporate earnings season under way, focus will be on results from Honeywell International Inc, Schlumberger N.V. and American Express Co. IHS Markit’s flash reading at 9:45 a.m ET is likely to show business activity in the manufacturing and services sectors improved in April from the prior month.

Market Snapshot

  • S&P 500 futures up 0.2% to 4,136.25
  • STOXX Europe 600 down 0.33% to 438.19
  • MXAP up 0.3% to 208.01
  • MXAPJ up 0.7% to 697.44
  • Nikkei down 0.6% to 29,020.63
  • Topix down 0.4% to 1,914.98
  • Hang Seng Index up 1.1% to 29,078.75
  • Shanghai Composite up 0.3% to 3,474.17
  • Sensex down 0.1% to 48,018.05
  • Australia S&P/ASX 200 little changed at 7,060.71
  • Kospi up 0.3% to 3,186.10
  • Brent Futures up 0.09% to $65.46/bbl
  • Gold spot up 0.11% to $1,785.98
  • U.S. Dollar Index down 0.33% to 91.033
  • German 10Y yield fell 1.7 bps to -0.269%
  • Euro up 0.33% to $1.2055

Top Overnight News from Bloomberg

  • The euro area’s economic recovery got fully underway in April with services returning to growth and manufacturing expanding at a record pace. Price pressures mounted as companies faced unprecedented delivery delays
  • Russia said it began pulling thousands of troops back from areas near the Ukrainian border Friday, in a move that could ease tensions that have spiked in recent weeks
  • Bitcoin declined for the seventh time in eight days, falling below $50,000, after President Joe Biden was said to propose almost doubling the capital-gains tax for the wealthy

A quick look at global markets courtesy of Newsquawk

Asia-Pac stocks head into the weekend mixed after the region partially shrugged off the early headwinds from the US where sentiment was spooked by reports that President Biden plans to hike capital gains tax to as much as 43.4% from the current top rate of 23.8%, which pressured the major indices and dragged all sectors in the red. Asian bourses suffered from early spillover selling although losses in the ASX 200 (+0.1%) were stemmed as telecoms remained afloat following the outcome of the 5G spectrum auction in which the top 3 telcos spent over AUD 600mln and with the largest-weighted financials sector cushioned by gains in AMP on plans for a demerger and listing of AMP Capital's private markets investment management business. Nikkei 225 (-0.6%) underperformed due to recent currency inflows and as participants brace for a return to a state of emergency with the government seeking an emergency declaration for Tokyo, Osaka, Kyoto and Hyogo between April 25th-May 11th and wants to significantly reduce the flow of people with stricter measures such as asking certain businesses to close including establishments that serve alcohol. Hang Seng (+1.1%) and Shanghai Comp. (+0.3%) were positive amid strength in Chinese tech names and with focus shifting to earnings whereby Ping An Insurance benefitted from profit growth for Q1, while CNOOC was less decisive despite a 4.7% Y/Y increase in its Q1 total net production. Finally, 10yr JGBs mirrored the choppy price action in T-note futures despite the underperformance of Japanese stocks and with demand also hampered by the lack of BoJ purchases in the market today, while the Australian 2024 bond auction had little effect on the 3yr yield which was relatively flat although both Aussie and Kiwi 10yr yields edged higher by around 3bps.

Top Asian News

  • Xiaomi Said to Mull Investing in AI Chipmaker Black Sesame
  • Carlyle Is Said to Weigh Stake Sale in Satellite Firm AsiaSat
  • Bridgestone Nearing U.S. Deal, Narrows List to a Few Candidates
  • Bain Sets Up First Japan Fund With $1 Billion Commitments

A lacklustre Friday session thus far for European majors (Euro Stoxx 50 -0.3%) with downbeat vibes seeping from Wall Street’s tax-induced losses, and after an indecisive APAC Friday as fresh catalysts remain light. US equity futures meanwhile consolidate with modest gains, although the cyclically-driven RTY (+0.7%) outperforms. Back to Europe, broad-based losses are seen across the bourses with no particular standout performer. Sectors are mostly in negative territory with Basic Resources topping the charts as base metals continue to rise, whilst Real Estate and Oil & Gas reside as the laggards, albeit the breath remains relatively narrow. Overall the sectors do not portray a theme nor a risk bias. Autos are buoyed as Daimler (+1%) underpins the sector following its earnings, in which it noted that unit sales, revenue, and EBIT expected to be significantly higher in 2021 than in the previous year while it raised its FY21 margin targets due to the firm Q1 performance. That being said, the group expects some potential further impact on Q2 production from the global chip shortage. In terms of individual movers, Tod’s (+11%) is bolstered amid reports LVMH (-0.1%) upped its stake in the Co. to 10%. Meanwhile, earnings-related movers include: Vinci (+1%), Vivendi (+3%), Moncler (-6.5%) and Saab (+8%).

Top European News

  • Daimler Raises Margin Outlook for Mercedes-Benz Division
  • A $120 Billion Danish Pension Manager Loses Faith in Bonds
  • Allfunds Surges After $2.3 Billion IPO Boosts Amsterdam’s Clout
  • Euro-Area Recovery Kicks In as Services Return to Growth

In FX, the Aussie may have received a boost from stronger preliminary PMIs overnight, but its firm rebound vs the Greenback seems more technical following yet another successful defence of 0.7700 or thereabouts. However, 0.7750 is proving tough to reclaim as Aud/Usd remains hampered by the ongoing rift with China over tariffs that has prompted Australia to cancel its Silk Road accord, while news of a 3-day lockdown in Perth may also offset some positivity surrounding constructive trade talks with the UK. However, the Aud/Nzd cross has bounced from around 1.0750 again as the Kiwi lags below 0.7200 against its US rival irrespective of a rebound in NZ credit card spending. Elsewhere, better than expected flash Eurozone PMIs, and especially from France appear to be keeping the Euro aloft after its sharp pull back in wake of a broadly uneventful ECB policy meeting to retest bids/support around 1.2000. Note also, Eur/Usd may be underpinned by decent option expiry interest just below the round number between 1.1990-80 (1.5 bn) as it holds just above 1.2050, while the Loonie should also be bolstered by expiries at the 1.2500 strike (1 bn) as it maintains post-BoC momentum, albeit after several wobbles and setbacks. Nevertheless, resistance looms at the new Usd/Cad 2021 low circa 1.2459 and then 1.2450 may be protected by 1.7 bn expiries extending to 1.2440. Meanwhile, Sterling continues to straddle 1.3850 vs the Buck following the loss of another big figure on Thursday and regardless of bumper UK retail sales data or better than anticipated preliminary PMIs, as Cable lags amidst renewed upside in Eur/Gbp towards 0.8700 on ongoing Oxford/Astra vaccine issues in part.

  • DXY/CHF/JPY - In keeping with several G10 counterparts, the Dollar may be drawing some comfort from the fact that dip buying has stemmed further depreciation, and in index terms the 91.000 level is becoming something of a line in the sand, although the Greenback remains under pressure and in bearish mode with the DXY easing into a lower 91.294-003 range ahead of Markit’s US PMIs and new home sales. Hence, fellow ‘safe-havens’ such as the Franc and Yen are taking advantage against the backdrop of consolidation in US Treasury and other global bond yields, as Usd/Chf and Usd/Jpy trade near the base of tight 0.9171-51 and 108.00-107.80 bands respectively. For the record, little reaction to in line Japanese CPI or broadly firmer PMIs as Tokyo and 3 other cities head back into emergency COVID-19 status.
  • EM - Risk sentiment has been rattled to an extent by US President Biden’s proposal to double the CGT rate, but most EM currencies are benefiting from ongoing Usd weakness, bar the Try for specific negative Turkish factors, but the Rub is also clawing back more of its heavy losses on perceptions that tensions between Russia and Ukraine are dissipating ahead of the upcoming CBR policy meeting which saw a larger than expected hike to 5.00% and further RUB upside.

In commodities, WTI and Brent front month futures are yet again undergoing choppy trade with some recent pressure experienced in lockstep with a dip across stocks. As mentioned throughout the week, the supply/demand dynamics remain ever-so-fluid as OPEC+ gears up for its technical meeting next week. At this point, it is still unclear whether members will convene for a decision meeting ministerial meeting following the technical JMMC confab. The latest sources via EnergyIntel suggested both will go ahead on the 28th of April, although other reports put more emphasis on the “monitoring” aspect whilst playing down the likelihood of a tweak to the last set quotas through to July. For any changes to occur, the ministerial meeting will have to go ahead. Meanwhile, The latest move by Russia to withdraw troops following military drills, perceived as a de-escalation, alongside seemingly construction JCPOA discussion, have unwound some geopolitical premia baked into prices in recent days. WTI is now flat on the day around USD 61.50/bbl (vs high USD 62.10/bbl), while its Brent counterpart dipped below USD 65.60/bbl (vs high 65.96/bbl). Elsewhere, spot gold and silver are relatively uneventful around recent ranges above USD 1,775/oz and USD 26/oz respectively. In terms of base metals, LME copper eclipsed 9,500/t as it’s on track for its third straight week of gains amid a softer Buck and firm demand prospects. Dalian iron ore prices meanwhile were bolstered by a rise in steel prices with some citing strengthening global demand for the alloy.

US Event Calendar

  • 9:45am: April Markit US Services PMI, est. 61.5, prior 60.4; Manufacturing PMI, est. 61.0, prior 59.1; Composite PMI, prior 59.7
  • 10am: March New Home Sales MoM, est. 14.2%, prior -18.2%; New Home Sales, est. 885,000, prior 775,000

DB's Jim Reid concludes the overnight wrap

I kissed my wife goodnight at 930pm last night and left her happy and well watching Masterchef. 4 hours later and I get woken up by chattering teeth and a weary demand that I need to keep her warm as she is feeling awful and has the shivers running through all her body. Yes she had her first covid jab yesterday. This was very predictable as she’s like this every year from the flu jab. All I could think of was that I’d have to look after the kids all alone this weekend. That started to break me out in a cold sweat.

So the virus still plays a big part in all our lives and markets and it was a pretty mixed session yesterday, with multiple asset classes fluctuating between gains and losses as they weighed up a variety of competing risks on the horizon. On the one hand, the rise in global Covid cases continued to accelerate, reaching its fastest pace of the pandemic so far and raising concerns about potential new restrictions on mobility.Yet a pullback in Russian troops from the Ukrainian border helped to reduce some of the geopolitical risk premium of late, while decent US labour market data bolstered sentiment around the economic recovery. However bearish sentiment got the last word yesterday as just after trading closed in Europe, reports circulated of the Biden administration proposing to nearly double the capital gains tax on the wealthiest individuals.

The new marginal tax rate would rise to 39.6% on investments, compared to the current base rate of 20%, while the current 3.8% surtax on investment income that helps fund Obamacare would also be kept in place. This would see taxes on investment returns become higher than those on labour, which has been a long standing provision of the tax code. White House Press Secretary Psaki noted that nothing is for certain just yet and that the administration is “still finalizing what the pay-fors look like” as the White House looks for ways to fund its spending initiatives. The S&P 500 fell -1.3% from its intraday highs before settling down -0.92% on the day, which leaves it just over 1% off its all-time closing high last week. The NASDAQ was down a slightly greater -0.94% yesterday, while the small cap Russell 2000 index outperformed slightly (-0.31%) but after a -1.8% intraday pullback on the tax headline. The losses were widespread with 70% of S&P 500 members lower and 21 of 24 industry groups losing ground. The turn in sentiment was seen in yields as well, with 10yr US Treasuries higher on day as yields fell -1.7bps to 1.538% after been as high as 1.5856% before the news.

Looking ahead, today’s main highlight will be the flash PMIs from around the world, which will give us an initial indication of how the global economy has fared moving into Q2. Overnight, we’ve already had the results from Australia and Japan, which showed improvements in manufacturing PMIs with Japan at 53.3 (vs. 52.7 last month) and Australia at 59.6 (vs. 56.8 expected). Japan’s services reading was flat at 48.3 compared to last month while Australia’s printed at 58.6 (vs. 55.5 last month). For the European figures out this morning, our economists are expecting a modest reversal after the strong March improvement, as many countries face increased restrictions in response to the latest wave of the virus.

Asia markets are trading mixed this morning with the Hang Seng (+0.90%) up, the Shanghai Comp (+0.05%) and Kospi (+0.03%) broadly flat and the Nikkei (-0.75%) down. Futures on the S&P 500 are back up +0.21% but European ones pointing to a weaker open as markets here try to catch up with the late move in US equities. Yields on 10y USTs are back up +1.9bps though. Elsewhere, Bitcoin is down -3.07% this morning to trade at $49,968, marking the 7th loss in the last 8 days. The crypto currency came under fresh pressure on the Biden tax headlines. In terms of data, Japan’s March CPI printed in line with expectations at -0.2% yoy while core CPI came in at -0.1% yoy (vs. -0.2% yoy expected).

Back to yesterday and the major focal point was the latest ECB meeting, but in reality there isn’t a massive amount to discuss as policy was left unchanged as expected. Instead, the meeting served as more of a placeholder ahead of the June decision, when the Governing Council will decide whether to maintain the new faster pace of PEPP purchases. President Lagarde didn’t provide any clues on that decision either, saying that the pace of purchases would be data-dependent, rather than time-dependent, and that it was “premature” to discuss a reduction in purchases. In terms of the other headlines, Lagarde said that the ECB wouldn’t move policy in tandem with the Fed, though that wasn’t exactly a great surprise, while she confirmed that the results of the ECB’s strategy review would be presented in the autumn. Our European economists remain confident of a strong recovery around mid-year. However, it’s unclear whether there will be sufficient data by the June meeting to provide the case for a deceleration in PEPP purchases. For more, see their ECB recap here.

Though sovereign bond yields in Europe had moved lower after the press conference, they ended the day little changed, with those on 10yr bunds (+1.0bps), OATs (+1.0bps) and BTPs (+0.2bps) seeing little movement. European equities had a much stronger session however, with the STOXX 600 (+0.68%), the DAX (+0.82%) and the CAC 40 (+0.91%) all recording solid gains.

The tax headlines in the US hampered sentiment after Europe went home and offset decent US labour market data, with the weekly initial jobless claims for the week through April 17 falling to a post-pandemic low of 547k (vs. 610k expected). This was beneath even the lowest estimate on Bloomberg, and sends the 4-week moving average down to its own post-pandemic low of 651k. Other measures similarly surprised to the upside, with the Chicago Fed’s national activity index up to +1.71 in March (vs. +1.25 expected), while the Kansas City Fed’s manufacturing index seeing the composite measure rise to 31 (vs. 28 expected), which is the strongest monthly composite reading since the survey began.

As mentioned at the top, the news on the pandemic has continued to deteriorate at a global level as numerous countries face a surge in cases. To put India’s rising case load in perspective, in mid-February they were running at around 10k new cases per day. This edged up to c.25k in early March but has now hit over 300k per day this week. Incredible numbers.Yesterday saw Japanese PM Suga recommend that the Tokyo, Osaka, Kyoto and Hyogo regions be placed under a new state of emergency. The number of new infections reported in Tokyo yesterday was its highest since late January, and comes just 3 months before the city is scheduled to host the Olympic Games. Meanwhile in Sweden, PM Lofven said that the easing of restrictions that had been planned for the start of May wouldn’t take place because of the high rates of transmission still being observed. However in France, Prime Minister Castex said the country will begin a “cautious” reopening in mid-May. First there will be a gradual easing of domestic travel restrictions beginning on May 3. This comes as Italy is expected to ease some lockdown rules itself this upcoming Monday and Germany is reportedly planning to ease some restrictions for those who have been vaccinated. Elsewhere, Bloomberg reported that China is likely to approve the BioNTech vaccine by July and will relax its requirement that inbound travelers have a jab made by a Chinese company.

Another major development yesterday came from Russia, where the defence minister said that troops which had been deployed near the Ukranian border would return to their bases. In response, Russian assets moved sharply higher, with the MOEX Russia index ending the day up +1.17%, while the Russian Ruble also strengthened significantly, rising +1.55% against the US Dollar. Ukranian President Zelensky welcomed the move in a tweet, saying that “The reduction of troops on our border proportionally reduces tension.”

Turning back to the US, there were some notable developments at President Biden’s climate summit, with the US announcing a new target for the US to reduce greenhouse gas pollution by 50-52% in 2030 compared to 2005 levels. This is on top of the administration’s existing goal of a net-zero emissions economy by 2050, and follows their move to re-join the Paris Climate Change agreement earlier in the year, which the US withdrew from under the Trump administration. This comes amidst a range of fresh targets lately from world leaders, with Japan’s Prime Minister yesterday announcing an increase in their own target, so that emissions would be down 46% from 2013 levels, up from a 26% target at present.

In terms of yesterday’s other data, existing home sales in the US fell to an annualised rate of 6.01m in March (vs. 6.11m expected), which is their lowest level in 7 months. Separately in the Euro Area, the European Commission’s advance consumer confidence reading for April came in at -8.1 (vs. -11.0 expected), which is its strongest reading since the pandemic began.

To the day ahead now, and the main highlight will likely be the aforementioned flash PMI readings for April. Otherwise, we’ll also get March data on UK retail sales and US new home sales. Earnings releases out today include Honeywell International and American Express, while the Central Bank of Russia will be making its latest monetary policy decision.

Tyler Durden Fri, 04/23/2021 - 08:03

Read More

Continue Reading

Government

Vaccine-skeptical mothers say bad health care experiences made them distrust the medical system

Vaccine skepticism, and the broader medical mistrust and far-reaching anxieties it reflects, is not just a fringe position in the 21st century.

Women's own negative medical experiences influence their vaccine decisions for their kids. AP Photo/Ted S. Warren

Why would a mother reject safe, potentially lifesaving vaccines for her child?

Popular writing on vaccine skepticism often denigrates white and middle-class mothers who reject some or all recommended vaccines as hysterical, misinformed, zealous or ignorant. Mainstream media and medical providers increasingly dismiss vaccine refusal as a hallmark of American fringe ideology, far-right radicalization or anti-intellectualism.

But vaccine skepticism, and the broader medical mistrust and far-reaching anxieties it reflects, is not just a fringe position.

Pediatric vaccination rates had already fallen sharply before the COVID-19 pandemic, ushering in the return of measles, mumps and chickenpox to the U.S. in 2019. Four years after the pandemic’s onset, a growing number of Americans doubt the safety, efficacy and necessity of routine vaccines. Childhood vaccination rates have declined substantially across the U.S., which public health officials attribute to a “spillover” effect from pandemic-related vaccine skepticism and blame for the recent measles outbreak. Almost half of American mothers rated the risk of side effects from the MMR vaccine as medium or high in a 2023 survey by Pew Research.

Recommended vaccines go through rigorous testing and evaluation, and the most infamous charges of vaccine-induced injury have been thoroughly debunked. How do so many mothers – primary caregivers and health care decision-makers for their families – become wary of U.S. health care and one of its most proven preventive technologies?

I’m a cultural anthropologist who studies the ways feelings and beliefs circulate in American society. To investigate what’s behind mothers’ vaccine skepticism, I interviewed vaccine-skeptical mothers about their perceptions of existing and novel vaccines. What they told me complicates sweeping and overly simplified portrayals of their misgivings by pointing to the U.S. health care system itself. The medical system’s failures and harms against women gave rise to their pervasive vaccine skepticism and generalized medical mistrust.

The seeds of women’s skepticism

I conducted this ethnographic research in Oregon from 2020 to 2021 with predominantly white mothers between the ages of 25 and 60. My findings reveal new insights about the origins of vaccine skepticism among this demographic. These women traced their distrust of vaccines, and of U.S. health care more generally, to ongoing and repeated instances of medical harm they experienced from childhood through childbirth.

girl sitting on exam table faces a doctor viewer can see from behind
A woman’s own childhood mistreatment by a doctor can shape her health care decisions for the next generation. FatCamera/E+ via Getty Images

As young girls in medical offices, they were touched without consent, yelled at, disbelieved or threatened. One mother, Susan, recalled her pediatrician abruptly lying her down and performing a rectal exam without her consent at the age of 12. Another mother, Luna, shared how a pediatrician once threatened to have her institutionalized when she voiced anxiety at a routine physical.

As women giving birth, they often felt managed, pressured or discounted. One mother, Meryl, told me, “I felt like I was coerced under distress into Pitocin and induction” during labor. Another mother, Hallie, shared, “I really battled with my provider” throughout the childbirth experience.

Together with the convoluted bureaucracy of for-profit health care, experiences of medical harm contributed to “one million little touch points of information,” in one mother’s phrase, that underscored the untrustworthiness and harmful effects of U.S. health care writ large.

A system that doesn’t serve them

Many mothers I interviewed rejected the premise that public health entities such as the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the Food and Drug Administration had their children’s best interests at heart. Instead, they tied childhood vaccination and the more recent development of COVID-19 vaccines to a bloated pharmaceutical industry and for-profit health care model. As one mother explained, “The FDA is not looking out for our health. They’re looking out for their wealth.”

After ongoing negative medical encounters, the women I interviewed lost trust not only in providers but the medical system. Frustrating experiences prompted them to “do their own research” in the name of bodily autonomy. Such research often included books, articles and podcasts deeply critical of vaccines, public health care and drug companies.

These materials, which have proliferated since 2020, cast light on past vaccine trials gone awry, broader histories of medical harm and abuse, the rapid growth of the recommended vaccine schedule in the late 20th century and the massive profits reaped from drug development and for-profit health care. They confirmed and hardened women’s suspicions about U.S. health care.

hands point to a handwritten vaccination record
The number of recommended childhood vaccines has increased over time. Mike Adaskaveg/MediaNews Group/Boston Herald via Getty Images

The stories these women told me add nuance to existing academic research into vaccine skepticism. Most studies have considered vaccine skepticism among primarily white and middle-class parents to be an outgrowth of today’s neoliberal parenting and intensive mothering. Researchers have theorized vaccine skepticism among white and well-off mothers to be an outcome of consumer health care and its emphasis on individual choice and risk reduction. Other researchers highlight vaccine skepticism as a collective identity that can provide mothers with a sense of belonging.

Seeing medical care as a threat to health

The perceptions mothers shared are far from isolated or fringe, and they are not unreasonable. Rather, they represent a growing population of Americans who hold the pervasive belief that U.S. health care harms more than it helps.

Data suggests that the number of Americans harmed in the course of treatment remains high, with incidents of medical error in the U.S. outnumbering those in peer countries, despite more money being spent per capita on health care. One 2023 study found that diagnostic error, one kind of medical error, accounted for 371,000 deaths and 424,000 permanent disabilities among Americans every year.

Studies reveal particularly high rates of medical error in the treatment of vulnerable communities, including women, people of color, disabled, poor, LGBTQ+ and gender-nonconforming individuals and the elderly. The number of U.S. women who have died because of pregnancy-related causes has increased substantially in recent years, with maternal death rates doubling between 1999 and 2019.

The prevalence of medical harm points to the relevance of philosopher Ivan Illich’s manifesto against the “disease of medical progress.” In his 1982 book “Medical Nemesis,” he insisted that rather than being incidental, harm flows inevitably from the structure of institutionalized and for-profit health care itself. Illich wrote, “The medical establishment has become a major threat to health,” and has created its own “epidemic” of iatrogenic illness – that is, illness caused by a physician or the health care system itself.

Four decades later, medical mistrust among Americans remains alarmingly high. Only 23% of Americans express high confidence in the medical system. The United States ranks 24th out of 29 peer high-income countries for the level of public trust in medical providers.

For people like the mothers I interviewed, who have experienced real or perceived harm at the hands of medical providers; have felt belittled, dismissed or disbelieved in a doctor’s office; or spent countless hours fighting to pay for, understand or use health benefits, skepticism and distrust are rational responses to lived experience. These attitudes do not emerge solely from ignorance, conspiracy thinking, far-right extremism or hysteria, but rather the historical and ongoing harms endemic to the U.S. health care system itself.

Johanna Richlin does not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organization that would benefit from this article, and has disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.

Read More

Continue Reading

International

Is the National Guard a solution to school violence?

School board members in one Massachusetts district have called for the National Guard to address student misbehavior. Does their request have merit? A…

Published

on

By

Every now and then, an elected official will suggest bringing in the National Guard to deal with violence that seems out of control.

A city council member in Washington suggested doing so in 2023 to combat the city’s rising violence. So did a Pennsylvania representative concerned about violence in Philadelphia in 2022.

In February 2024, officials in Massachusetts requested the National Guard be deployed to a more unexpected location – to a high school.

Brockton High School has been struggling with student fights, drug use and disrespect toward staff. One school staffer said she was trampled by a crowd rushing to see a fight. Many teachers call in sick to work each day, leaving the school understaffed.

As a researcher who studies school discipline, I know Brockton’s situation is part of a national trend of principals and teachers who have been struggling to deal with perceived increases in student misbehavior since the pandemic.

A review of how the National Guard has been deployed to schools in the past shows the guard can provide service to schools in cases of exceptional need. Yet, doing so does not always end well.

How have schools used the National Guard before?

In 1957, the National Guard blocked nine Black students’ attempts to desegregate Central High School in Little Rock, Arkansas. While the governor claimed this was for safety, the National Guard effectively delayed desegregation of the school – as did the mobs of white individuals outside. Ironically, weeks later, the National Guard and the U.S. Army would enforce integration and the safety of the “Little Rock Nine” on orders from President Dwight Eisenhower.

Three men from the mob around Little Rock’s Central High School are driven from the area at bayonet-point by soldiers of the 101st Airborne Division on Sept. 25, 1957. The presence of the troops permitted the nine Black students to enter the school with only minor background incidents. Bettmann via Getty Images

One of the most tragic cases of the National Guard in an educational setting came in 1970 at Kent State University. The National Guard was brought to campus to respond to protests over American involvement in the Vietnam War. The guardsmen fatally shot four students.

In 2012, then-Sen. Barbara Boxer, a Democrat from California, proposed funding to use the National Guard to provide school security in the wake of the Sandy Hook school shooting. The bill was not passed.

More recently, the National Guard filled teacher shortages in New Mexico’s K-12 schools during the quarantines and sickness of the pandemic. While the idea did not catch on nationally, teachers and school personnel in New Mexico generally reported positive experiences.

Can the National Guard address school discipline?

The National Guard’s mission includes responding to domestic emergencies. Members of the guard are part-time service members who maintain civilian lives. Some are students themselves in colleges and universities. Does this mission and training position the National Guard to respond to incidents of student misbehavior and school violence?

On the one hand, New Mexico’s pandemic experience shows the National Guard could be a stopgap to staffing shortages in unusual circumstances. Similarly, the guards’ eventual role in ensuring student safety during school desegregation in Arkansas demonstrates their potential to address exceptional cases in schools, such as racially motivated mob violence. And, of course, many schools have had military personnel teaching and mentoring through Junior ROTC programs for years.

Those seeking to bring the National Guard to Brockton High School have made similar arguments. They note that staffing shortages have contributed to behavior problems.

One school board member stated: “I know that the first thought that comes to mind when you hear ‘National Guard’ is uniform and arms, and that’s not the case. They’re people like us. They’re educated. They’re trained, and we just need their assistance right now. … We need more staff to support our staff and help the students learn (and) have a safe environment.”

Yet, there are reasons to question whether calls for the National Guard are the best way to address school misconduct and behavior. First, the National Guard is a temporary measure that does little to address the underlying causes of student misbehavior and school violence.

Research has shown that students benefit from effective teaching, meaningful and sustained relationships with school personnel and positive school environments. Such educative and supportive environments have been linked to safer schools. National Guard members are not trained as educators or counselors and, as a temporary measure, would not remain in the school to establish durable relationships with students.

What is more, a military presence – particularly if uniformed or armed – may make students feel less welcome at school or escalate situations.

Schools have already seen an increase in militarization. For example, school police departments have gone so far as to acquire grenade launchers and mine-resistant armored vehicles.

Research has found that school police make students more likely to be suspended and to be arrested. Similarly, while a National Guard presence may address misbehavior temporarily, their presence could similarly result in students experiencing punitive or exclusionary responses to behavior.

Students deserve a solution other than the guard

School violence and disruptions are serious problems that can harm students. Unfortunately, schools and educators have increasingly viewed student misbehavior as a problem to be dealt with through suspensions and police involvement.

A number of people – from the NAACP to the local mayor and other members of the school board – have criticized Brockton’s request for the National Guard. Governor Maura Healey has said she will not deploy the guard to the school.

However, the case of Brockton High School points to real needs. Educators there, like in other schools nationally, are facing a tough situation and perceive a lack of support and resources.

Many schools need more teachers and staff. Students need access to mentors and counselors. With these resources, schools can better ensure educators are able to do their jobs without military intervention.

F. Chris Curran has received funding from the US Department of Justice, the Bureau of Justice Assistance, and the American Civil Liberties Union for work on school safety and discipline.

Read More

Continue Reading

Spread & Containment

Chinese migration to US is nothing new – but the reasons for recent surge at Southern border are

A gloomier economic outlook in China and tightening state control have combined with the influence of social media in encouraging migration.

Published

on

By

Chinese migrants wait for a boat after having walked across the Darien Gap from Colombia to Panama. AP Photo/Natacha Pisarenko

The brief closure of the Darien Gap – a perilous 66-mile jungle journey linking South American and Central America – in February 2024 temporarily halted one of the Western Hemisphere’s busiest migration routes. It also highlighted its importance to a small but growing group of people that depend on that pass to make it to the U.S.: Chinese migrants.

While a record 2.5 million migrants were detained at the United States’ southwestern land border in 2023, only about 37,000 were from China.

I’m a scholar of migration and China. What I find most remarkable in these figures is the speed with which the number of Chinese migrants is growing. Nearly 10 times as many Chinese migrants crossed the southern border in 2023 as in 2022. In December 2023 alone, U.S. Border Patrol officials reported encounters with about 6,000 Chinese migrants, in contrast to the 900 they reported a year earlier in December 2022.

The dramatic uptick is the result of a confluence of factors that range from a slowing Chinese economy and tightening political control by President Xi Jinping to the easy access to online information on Chinese social media about how to make the trip.

Middle-class migrants

Journalists reporting from the border have generalized that Chinese migrants come largely from the self-employed middle class. They are not rich enough to use education or work opportunities as a means of entry, but they can afford to fly across the world.

According to a report from Reuters, in many cases those attempting to make the crossing are small-business owners who saw irreparable damage to their primary or sole source of income due to China’s “zero COVID” policies. The migrants are women, men and, in some cases, children accompanying parents from all over China.

Chinese nationals have long made the journey to the United States seeking economic opportunity or political freedom. Based on recent media interviews with migrants coming by way of South America and the U.S.’s southern border, the increase in numbers seems driven by two factors.

First, the most common path for immigration for Chinese nationals is through a student visa or H1-B visa for skilled workers. But travel restrictions during the early months of the pandemic temporarily stalled migration from China. Immigrant visas are out of reach for many Chinese nationals without family or vocation-based preferences, and tourist visas require a personal interview with a U.S. consulate to gauge the likelihood of the traveler returning to China.

Social media tutorials

Second, with the legal routes for immigration difficult to follow, social media accounts have outlined alternatives for Chinese who feel an urgent need to emigrate. Accounts on Douyin, the TikTok clone available in mainland China, document locations open for visa-free travel by Chinese passport holders. On TikTok itself, migrants could find information on where to cross the border, as well as information about transportation and smugglers, commonly known as “snakeheads,” who are experienced with bringing migrants on the journey north.

With virtual private networks, immigrants can also gather information from U.S. apps such as X, YouTube, Facebook and other sites that are otherwise blocked by Chinese censors.

Inspired by social media posts that both offer practical guides and celebrate the journey, thousands of Chinese migrants have been flying to Ecuador, which allows visa-free travel for Chinese citizens, and then making their way over land to the U.S.-Mexican border.

This journey involves trekking through the Darien Gap, which despite its notoriety as a dangerous crossing has become an increasingly common route for migrants from Venezuela, Colombia and all over the world.

In addition to information about crossing the Darien Gap, these social media posts highlight the best places to cross the border. This has led to a large share of Chinese asylum seekers following the same path to Mexico’s Baja California to cross the border near San Diego.

Chinese migration to US is nothing new

The rapid increase in numbers and the ease of accessing information via social media on their smartphones are new innovations. But there is a longer history of Chinese migration to the U.S. over the southern border – and at the hands of smugglers.

From 1882 to 1943, the United States banned all immigration by male Chinese laborers and most Chinese women. A combination of economic competition and racist concerns about Chinese culture and assimilability ensured that the Chinese would be the first ethnic group to enter the United States illegally.

With legal options for arrival eliminated, some Chinese migrants took advantage of the relative ease of movement between the U.S. and Mexico during those years. While some migrants adopted Mexican names and spoke enough Spanish to pass as migrant workers, others used borrowed identities or paperwork from Chinese people with a right of entry, like U.S.-born citizens. Similarly to what we are seeing today, it was middle- and working-class Chinese who more frequently turned to illegal means. Those with money and education were able to circumvent the law by arriving as students or members of the merchant class, both exceptions to the exclusion law.

Though these Chinese exclusion laws officially ended in 1943, restrictions on migration from Asia continued until Congress revised U.S. immigration law in the Hart-Celler Act in 1965. New priorities for immigrant visas that stressed vocational skills as well as family reunification, alongside then Chinese leader Deng Xiaoping’s policies of “reform and opening,” helped many Chinese migrants make their way legally to the U.S. in the 1980s and 1990s.

Even after the restrictive immigration laws ended, Chinese migrants without the education or family connections often needed for U.S. visas continued to take dangerous routes with the help of “snakeheads.”

One notorious incident occurred in 1993, when a ship called the Golden Venture ran aground near New York, resulting in the drowning deaths of 10 Chinese migrants and the arrest and conviction of the snakeheads attempting to smuggle hundreds of Chinese migrants into the United States.

Existing tensions

Though there is plenty of precedent for Chinese migrants arriving without documentation, Chinese asylum seekers have better odds of success than many of the other migrants making the dangerous journey north.

An estimated 55% of Chinese asylum seekers are successful in making their claims, often citing political oppression and lack of religious freedom in China as motivations. By contrast, only 29% of Venezuelans seeking asylum in the U.S. have their claim granted, and the number is even lower for Colombians, at 19%.

The new halt on the migratory highway from the south has affected thousands of new migrants seeking refuge in the U.S. But the mix of push factors from their home country and encouragement on social media means that Chinese migrants will continue to seek routes to America.

And with both migration and the perceived threat from China likely to be features of the upcoming U.S. election, there is a risk that increased Chinese migration could become politicized, leaning further into existing tensions between Washington and Beijing.

Meredith Oyen does not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organization that would benefit from this article, and has disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.

Read More

Continue Reading

Trending