Connect with us

Do Not Create A Bitcoin Ideology

The very power structures we hope to abandon via Bitcoin pose to corrupt those involved in the space as much as any other.

Published

on

The very power structures we hope to abandon via Bitcoin pose to corrupt those involved in the space as much as any other.

Rule VI: Abandon Bitcoin Ideology

A reimagination of “Beyond Order” by Jordan Peterson through the lens of Bitcoin.

Preface

These essays mirror the exact chronological structure of “Beyond Order” by Jordan Peterson, offering a reflection through a Bitcoin lens. This is chapter 6 of a 12-part series. If you read the book, it adds a second dimension. All quotes credited to Jordan Peterson. All reflections inspired by Satoshi Nakamoto.

The Wrong Places

“I find it heart-wrenching to see how little encouragement and guidance so many people have received, and how much good can emerge when just a little more is provided. ‘I knew you could do it’ is a good start …”

Technology moves so fast that staying current is a full-time job that gets harder with age. Younger generations born into tech take to it like a fish to water. Older generations struggle to grasp technology and the feeling of obsolescence naturally engenders resentment. Traditionally, older generations encourage and guide younger generations, but, with respect to technology, those tables have turned. Technology enables young people to grow up too fast. There are millions of experts and guides on the internet versus mom and dad (if you’re lucky). And mom and dad can’t compete with the collective knowledge of the internet.

Bitcoin is popular among the younger tech savvy crowd. Could it be that the resentment from the older generation stems from their fear of technology itself? Bitcoiners claim to see the writing on the wall, while fiat holders cling to the ridiculousness of money backed solely by decree. Those who fear what they do not understand cast arrows understandably. But, when we respond in kind, it does neither party any favor. In this bizarre age of the internet, it is not more insults needed rather than encouragement and guidance of our fellow man. When your Bitcoin knowledge comes into contact with a no-coiner you should expect them to reject it out of fear of the unknown.

I’m certainly guilty of going overboard on more than one occasion. It can feel good to flex your knowledge in a bit of dueling pistols. In hindsight, a better place to start is to offer a bit of encouragement or guidance. Show someone how easy it is to send bitcoin over the Lightning network. Make the scary Bitcoin technology feel approachable. That will give you the power to say, “I knew you could do it.” Ironically, patiently dispensing our wisdom applies to our parents. Do not mock the older generations for their fear of what is new, creative and unknown — show them love and help them. It is tempting to twist them into Bitcoin submission but my best advice is to take it slow because time is on our side. Bitcoiners know the sooner the better, but if you want to be successful with no-coiners, educate with a better late than never mentality. And when it clicks, “I knew you could do it” is a good start.

“… the meaning that sustains life in all its tragedy and disappointment is to be found in shouldering the noble burden. Because we have not been doing this, [young people] have grown up looking in all the wrong places.”

The world is awash in money. It seems to be everywhere except your bank account. Trillions are printed and distributed. Internet stars flaunt their successful lifestyles. And we can’t stop staring. Humans are mimicking creatures. What we see influences us and we cannot help but imitate. What’s obvious is a small group of people with an outsized internet presence display dreamy lifestyles we can see but cannot touch. They dangle utopia before our eyes and somewhere within us we believe it is within our reach. So, we mimic in pursuit in all the wrong places.

The internet offers everything but pushes entertainment and controversy to the forefront. And you only have one pair of eyes. To find a noble burden you may need to search rather than be guided by the algorithms of internet giants. You are a meal ticket to the internet. Like Neo in “The Matrix,” shouldering the noble burden must be a voluntary choice. Bitcoin is one such noble burden. It is no small choice to opt out of the financial regime you were born into.

“And this has left them vulnerable: vulnerable to easy answers and susceptible to the deadening force of resentment.”

The internet is a deceptive beast. It surfaces only the outliers on the bell curve. It is designed to promote extremism in every category. That is what is pushed to our screens, that is the content we cannot help but share with our friends. And when so much of what we see appears easy yet unattainable we feel insecure. It’s often said that capitalism thrives by making you feel insecure. The internet took that into overdrive. We are never going to measure up to the standards the internet portrays.

National currencies are exhibiting similar behaviors. There are wizards of money in the government who magically print trillions to save us — or so we’re told. They give us easy answers to troubling times. We do not control this money, but it’s flaunted in front of our faces. We get to nibble on the bits keeping us vested in the process. The lifestyle of the elusive internet star to its viewer is no different than the person with the power to print money while you must work for it. You will never measure up regardless of how hard you work. On many levels, we know that so many of us give up for a damn good reason: Working is tainted with futility when the game is rigged.

Perhaps He Is Only Sleeping

“Friedrich Nietzsche famously announced ‘God is dead.’”

You remember 10 years of people telling you Bitcoin is dead? Bitcoin Obituaries will jog your memories. Before panicking about price, take a step back and think about how far the narrative has come. Nietzsche’s quote is not a celebration but rather a warning. If Bitcoin dies, so does our best chance at a universal better, brighter future. That’s what is at stake. Countless modern political movements over redistributing wealth, freedom, equality, opportunity and power will be positively impacted by Bitcoin. And it won’t be a helpless asymmetrical uphill battle. It’s inherent in the source code.

“The doubt that undermines and the uncertainty that crushes: Nietzsche’s prognostication for the two alternatives that would arise in the aftermath of the death of God.”

God serves as an anchor to His believers despite the fact we live in an era of peak skepticism regarding religion. Our societal unraveling is, in part, explained by our lack of morality once derived through community and church. It is no wonder that society is in a downward spiral when considering our desperate pursuit of money over morality. Modern money is so cleverly designed to consume all our time. Buying bitcoin buys you time.

In the aftermath of the decline of money, what will you anchor yourself to? The founding of our monetary system is as much a conspiracy theory as Bitcoin. What can you possibly trust? And our lives are overwhelmed by uncertainty with an endless stream of cataclysmic threats. Study money for long enough and you will come to the conclusion that what is happening now has happened many times before. Bitcoin’s irony is that it makes crystal clear sense to people in third world or developing nations who have questionable money. The benefits are a godsend. It is America, above all else, where our top position is the very thing which creates doubt, confusion and uncertainty regarding Bitcoin.

Doubt and uncertainty come to those without anchors. Nietzsche pronounced “God is dead” not in a celebratory tone but as a dire warning of the consequences. Where do we get our morality from? In my lifetime, people have gone from worshipping God to worshipping the dollar. People put the dollar on the highest altar. Yet we know it is an unanchored entity. It’s no wonder we’ve lost our sense of morality. It’s no wonder we’ve become directionless. Bitcoin is an anchor, a center of gravity. Look around yourself, what anchors do you have left?

“What if there are experiences that typically manifest themselves to one person at a time … but appear to form a meaningful pattern when considered collectively?”

Bitcoin is a grassroots movement. Individuals must come to terms with whether that means they believe or do not believe in its validity. There are many roads that lead to Bitcoin’s adoption yet all share the same final destination: It demands responsibility. Final settlement places the responsibility on the owner. You are the backstop. If you trust an exchange to hold your bitcoin and they lose it, that is your loss. If you lose your hardware wallet, it is your fault. This is a massive shift in mindset. Bitcoin skeptics point to its lack of FDIC insurance. Fiat has trained us that money is replaceable. If you lose a bar of gold, it is gone. It harkens back to a time when responsibility was far more visceral.

America has made a business out of risk reduction and strategically distancing oneself from responsibility. It has become a terrible top-down American skillset weaponized by our institutions and cultural pastime adopted by citizens. It’s no wonder we’ve become soft as a nation. Jocko, Jordan Peterson and David Goggins are such popular speaker authors explicitly because it seems they are our only leaders who promote the benefits of running toward responsibility. This includes our money. Politicians used to balk at large spending bills asking, “How will we pay for this?” Notice that the question of responsibility rarely gets asked these days. If all you had to do to solve problems is print money then why pussyfoot around? Why not give everyone a million dollars? Bitcoin is an illusion-shattering reality. America has become so accustomed to money being manipulated that we no longer recognize honest money.

The Fatal Attraction Of The False Idol

“… the ideologue can place himself or herself on the morally correct side of the equation without the genuine effort necessary to do so validly, it is much easier and more immediately gratifying to reduce the problem to something simple and accompany it with an evildoer, who can then be morally opposed.”

“Bitcoin fixes this” is a misconstrued meme by both Bitcoiners and no-coiners. Bitcoiners following party lines believe all problems can be solved by fiat when this is simply not the truth. Better money certainly applies to an enormous spectrum of problems, yet there are plenty of underlying problems specific to each individual problem divorced from currency. Without doubt, freely printing money leads to the predictable deterioration of everything, but it also serves a purpose. During the pandemic, one can make the case that being unable to print trillions would’ve led to untold millions suffering and possibly perishing. What would have happened if we couldn’t print?

“For the ideologue, however, nothing remains outside understanding or mastery. An ideological theory explains everything … This means that an ideologue can consider him or herself in possession of the complete truth.”

Central Banks and Bitcoiners alike are guilty of believing their product cures all ailments. Both Jerome Powell and Neel Kashkari shocked the world when they exposed the Fed’s God-like ability and willingness to print unlimited money by simply editing the account. Bitcoin purists live on the opposite end of that spectrum. They are like surgeons who don’t believe in sedatives, because it weakens the human spirit. There is something noble to this way of thinking. But seeing how much pain and suffering already exists in the world, it must be believed that a responsible dose of painkillers is tolerable so long as it does not become an addiction. Around the year 1971, our money began its dark descent into our modern addiction. So, WTF happened in 1971? Nixon severed the tie between the U.S. dollar and gold; that’s any indicator. This evidence seems so utterly convincing but it isn’t to say it’s the complete truth.

I believe it’s possible our complex world benefits from, and may require, both systems in the near term — USD and bitcoin. We will need a bridge to get to mass Bitcoin adoption and hyperbitcoinization is likely a terrifying approach. I’m hesitant to believe any one system completely encompasses the countless economic scenarios to come. That said, we are fully addicted to unlimited money and are in dire need of homeostasis. I have no doubt that bitcoin restores balance in contrast to fiat’s recklessness. “Fix the money, fix the world” is another Bitcoin meme. Our world is in such dire straits, I fear we will need both bitcoin and central bank digital currency (CBDC) for the foreseeable future, as painful as that sounds to Bitcoin purists.

Ressentiment

“This is a terrible trap: Once the source of evil has been identified, it becomes the duty of the righteous to eradicate it.”

There is palpable tension between nation states, banks and Bitcoin. Nation states have shifted tone from “Bitcoin is a scam” to “Bitcoin is speculative” to “Bitcoin is a gold alternative.” In other words, our government is coming to grips with the fact it underestimated Bitcoin. We should not repay the favor. Bitcoin has gone from playing in the shadows to being on the cusp of mainstream adoption. Bitcoiners may be repeating our government’s folly as our tone is shifting from “Bitcoin is digital gold” to “Bitcoin is money” edging ever closer as the Bitcoin community senses national currency vulnerability. A subset of Bitcoiners press the aggressive idea that the U.S. dollar is a scam. While the comments have merit, this is dangerous ground as it oversimplifies a complex macro economy.

U.S. dollars are a functional high utility tool losing value. Bitcoin is blessed with value and building layers toward high functionality. Bitcoin will win, but we need to learn how to bridge these two worlds. Bitcoin is the escape hatch at the end of the tunnel. Good comes from tribalism, but the negative elements include the idea that the dollar exists solely with evil intention. It ignores the reality that the dollar, by and large, is the fabric that connects our world and establishes order. In our eagerness to see continued adoption of what we believe to be a harder money, we may be wholly unprepared for life without the U.S. dollar altogether. Be careful what you wish for. Most failures are in execution.

“We’re still so early” meme calls out signals by no-coiners. Bitcoiners spend a lot of time being attacked. Now that momentum is shifting. How will we act when we begin to get a taste of power? In “Crossing The Chasm,” we are exiting the Innovators stage and entering the Early Adopters stage. It’s far too early to claim victory and far too soon to believe Bitcoin will simply be set to cruise control into the sunset. Will we become the monsters we’ve replaced?

“It is much safer morally to look to yourself for the errors of the world …”

Bitcoiners are known to behave like white blood cells, actively attacking suspected intruders. Before we go on the full offensive and tear down every national currency in the belief they hold no purpose and bitcoin can suffice … perhaps it would behoove us to remain focused on building what bitcoin can offer rather than criticizing what dollars cannot do.

“To take the world’s sins onto yourself — to assume responsibility for the fact that things have not been set right in your own life and elsewhere — is part of the messianic path: part of the imitation of the hero…”

If you believe your money has not been set right, it is on you to take responsibility. For some that may mean buying gold. For others, bitcoin. Part of the hero’s journey is to confront and overcome a great challenge, be changed in the process, then come home to reintegrate that change within society.

In my life I’ve learned you get a lot more credibility when you don’t bad mouth incumbents, competitors or alternative solutions. We lose credibility when it’s discovered we selectively straw man our opponents. Credibility is built when we can point out the differences while minimizing personal bias. Major credibility can be gained when we steelman the opposition prior to pointing out the differences.

It is hard to change yourself and it’s exceptionally difficult to change another grown up’s mind. Cory Klippsten put it best that “Bitcoin marketing is Bitcoin education.” But know that, if national currencies continue to harm its citizens, it will push its citizens toward better options. That same game theory exists between nations as those at the bottom with more to gain will benefit asymmetrically with Bitcoin-friendly legislation. For the first time in 100 years, the future of money is up for grabs. Jack Mallers believes Bitcoin’s key differentiator is its openness and I tend to believe the same.

Abandon Bitcoin Ideology.

This is a guest post by Nelson Chen. Opinions expressed are entirely their own and do not necessarily reflect those of BTC, Inc. or Bitcoin Magazine.

Read More

Continue Reading

International

Beloved mall retailer files Chapter 7 bankruptcy, will liquidate

The struggling chain has given up the fight and will close hundreds of stores around the world.

Published

on

It has been a brutal period for several popular retailers. The fallout from the covid pandemic and a challenging economic environment have pushed numerous chains into bankruptcy with Tuesday Morning, Christmas Tree Shops, and Bed Bath & Beyond all moving from Chapter 11 to Chapter 7 bankruptcy liquidation.

In all three of those cases, the companies faced clear financial pressures that led to inventory problems and vendors demanding faster, or even upfront payment. That creates a sort of inevitability.

Related: Beloved retailer finds life after bankruptcy, new famous owner

When a retailer faces financial pressure it sets off a cycle where vendors become wary of selling them items. That leads to barren shelves and no ability for the chain to sell its way out of its financial problems. 

Once that happens bankruptcy generally becomes the only option. Sometimes that means a Chapter 11 filing which gives the company a chance to negotiate with its creditors. In some cases, deals can be worked out where vendors extend longer terms or even forgive some debts, and banks offer an extension of loan terms.

In other cases, new funding can be secured which assuages vendor concerns or the company might be taken over by its vendors. Sometimes, as was the case with David's Bridal, a new owner steps in, adds new money, and makes deals with creditors in order to give the company a new lease on life.

It's rare that a retailer moves directly into Chapter 7 bankruptcy and decides to liquidate without trying to find a new source of funding.

Mall traffic has varied depending upon the type of mall.

Image source: Getty Images

The Body Shop has bad news for customers  

The Body Shop has been in a very public fight for survival. Fears began when the company closed half of its locations in the United Kingdom. That was followed by a bankruptcy-style filing in Canada and an abrupt closure of its U.S. stores on March 4.

"The Canadian subsidiary of the global beauty and cosmetics brand announced it has started restructuring proceedings by filing a Notice of Intention (NOI) to Make a Proposal pursuant to the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act (Canada). In the same release, the company said that, as of March 1, 2024, The Body Shop US Limited has ceased operations," Chain Store Age reported.

A message on the company's U.S. website shared a simple message that does not appear to be the entire story.

"We're currently undergoing planned maintenance, but don't worry we're due to be back online soon."

That same message is still on the company's website, but a new filing makes it clear that the site is not down for maintenance, it's down for good.

The Body Shop files for Chapter 7 bankruptcy

While the future appeared bleak for The Body Shop, fans of the brand held out hope that a savior would step in. That's not going to be the case. 

The Body Shop filed for Chapter 7 bankruptcy in the United States.

"The US arm of the ethical cosmetics group has ceased trading at its 50 outlets. On Saturday (March 9), it filed for Chapter 7 insolvency, under which assets are sold off to clear debts, putting about 400 jobs at risk including those in a distribution center that still holds millions of dollars worth of stock," The Guardian reported.

After its closure in the United States, the survival of the brand remains very much in doubt. About half of the chain's stores in the United Kingdom remain open along with its Australian stores. 

The future of those stores remains very much in doubt and the chain has shared that it needs new funding in order for them to continue operating.

The Body Shop did not respond to a request for comment from TheStreet.   

Read More

Continue Reading

Government

Are Voters Recoiling Against Disorder?

Are Voters Recoiling Against Disorder?

Authored by Michael Barone via The Epoch Times (emphasis ours),

The headlines coming out of the Super…

Published

on

Are Voters Recoiling Against Disorder?

Authored by Michael Barone via The Epoch Times (emphasis ours),

The headlines coming out of the Super Tuesday primaries have got it right. Barring cataclysmic changes, Donald Trump and Joe Biden will be the Republican and Democratic nominees for president in 2024.

(Left) President Joe Biden delivers remarks on canceling student debt at Culver City Julian Dixon Library in Culver City, Calif., on Feb. 21, 2024. (Right) Republican presidential candidate and former U.S. President Donald Trump stands on stage during a campaign event at Big League Dreams Las Vegas in Las Vegas, Nev., on Jan. 27, 2024. (Mario Tama/Getty Images; David Becker/Getty Images)

With Nikki Haley’s withdrawal, there will be no more significantly contested primaries or caucuses—the earliest both parties’ races have been over since something like the current primary-dominated system was put in place in 1972.

The primary results have spotlighted some of both nominees’ weaknesses.

Donald Trump lost high-income, high-educated constituencies, including the entire metro area—aka the Swamp. Many but by no means all Haley votes there were cast by Biden Democrats. Mr. Trump can’t afford to lose too many of the others in target states like Pennsylvania and Michigan.

Majorities and large minorities of voters in overwhelmingly Latino counties in Texas’s Rio Grande Valley and some in Houston voted against Joe Biden, and even more against Senate nominee Rep. Colin Allred (D-Texas).

Returns from Hispanic precincts in New Hampshire and Massachusetts show the same thing. Mr. Biden can’t afford to lose too many Latino votes in target states like Arizona and Georgia.

When Mr. Trump rode down that escalator in 2015, commentators assumed he’d repel Latinos. Instead, Latino voters nationally, and especially the closest eyewitnesses of Biden’s open-border policy, have been trending heavily Republican.

High-income liberal Democrats may sport lawn signs proclaiming, “In this house, we believe ... no human is illegal.” The logical consequence of that belief is an open border. But modest-income folks in border counties know that flows of illegal immigrants result in disorder, disease, and crime.

There is plenty of impatience with increased disorder in election returns below the presidential level. Consider Los Angeles County, America’s largest county, with nearly 10 million people, more people than 40 of the 50 states. It voted 71 percent for Mr. Biden in 2020.

Current returns show county District Attorney George Gascon winning only 21 percent of the vote in the nonpartisan primary. He’ll apparently face Republican Nathan Hochman, a critic of his liberal policies, in November.

Gascon, elected after the May 2020 death of counterfeit-passing suspect George Floyd in Minneapolis, is one of many county prosecutors supported by billionaire George Soros. His policies include not charging juveniles as adults, not seeking higher penalties for gang membership or use of firearms, and bringing fewer misdemeanor cases.

The predictable result has been increased car thefts, burglaries, and personal robberies. Some 120 assistant district attorneys have left the office, and there’s a backlog of 10,000 unprosecuted cases.

More than a dozen other Soros-backed and similarly liberal prosecutors have faced strong opposition or have left office.

St. Louis prosecutor Kim Gardner resigned last May amid lawsuits seeking her removal, Milwaukee’s John Chisholm retired in January, and Baltimore’s Marilyn Mosby was defeated in July 2022 and convicted of perjury in September 2023. Last November, Loudoun County, Virginia, voters (62 percent Biden) ousted liberal Buta Biberaj, who declined to prosecute a transgender student for assault, and in June 2022 voters in San Francisco (85 percent Biden) recalled famed radical Chesa Boudin.

Similarly, this Tuesday, voters in San Francisco passed ballot measures strengthening police powers and requiring treatment of drug-addicted welfare recipients.

In retrospect, it appears the Floyd video, appearing after three months of COVID-19 confinement, sparked a frenzied, even crazed reaction, especially among the highly educated and articulate. One fatal incident was seen as proof that America’s “systemic racism” was worse than ever and that police forces should be defunded and perhaps abolished.

2020 was “the year America went crazy,” I wrote in January 2021, a year in which police funding was actually cut by Democrats in New York, Los Angeles, San Francisco, Seattle, and Denver. A year in which young New York Times (NYT) staffers claimed they were endangered by the publication of Sen. Tom Cotton’s (R-Ark.) opinion article advocating calling in military forces if necessary to stop rioting, as had been done in Detroit in 1967 and Los Angeles in 1992. A craven NYT publisher even fired the editorial page editor for running the article.

Evidence of visible and tangible discontent with increasing violence and its consequences—barren and locked shelves in Manhattan chain drugstores, skyrocketing carjackings in Washington, D.C.—is as unmistakable in polls and election results as it is in daily life in large metropolitan areas. Maybe 2024 will turn out to be the year even liberal America stopped acting crazy.

Chaos and disorder work against incumbents, as they did in 1968 when Democrats saw their party’s popular vote fall from 61 percent to 43 percent.

Views expressed in this article are opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of The Epoch Times or ZeroHedge.

Tyler Durden Sat, 03/09/2024 - 23:20

Read More

Continue Reading

Government

Veterans Affairs Kept COVID-19 Vaccine Mandate In Place Without Evidence

Veterans Affairs Kept COVID-19 Vaccine Mandate In Place Without Evidence

Authored by Zachary Stieber via The Epoch Times (emphasis ours),

The…

Published

on

Veterans Affairs Kept COVID-19 Vaccine Mandate In Place Without Evidence

Authored by Zachary Stieber via The Epoch Times (emphasis ours),

The U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) reviewed no data when deciding in 2023 to keep its COVID-19 vaccine mandate in place.

Doses of a COVID-19 vaccine in Washington in a file image. (Jacquelyn Martin/Pool/AFP via Getty Images)

VA Secretary Denis McDonough said on May 1, 2023, that the end of many other federal mandates “will not impact current policies at the Department of Veterans Affairs.”

He said the mandate was remaining for VA health care personnel “to ensure the safety of veterans and our colleagues.”

Mr. McDonough did not cite any studies or other data. A VA spokesperson declined to provide any data that was reviewed when deciding not to rescind the mandate. The Epoch Times submitted a Freedom of Information Act for “all documents outlining which data was relied upon when establishing the mandate when deciding to keep the mandate in place.”

The agency searched for such data and did not find any.

The VA does not even attempt to justify its policies with science, because it can’t,” Leslie Manookian, president and founder of the Health Freedom Defense Fund, told The Epoch Times.

“The VA just trusts that the process and cost of challenging its unfounded policies is so onerous, most people are dissuaded from even trying,” she added.

The VA’s mandate remains in place to this day.

The VA’s website claims that vaccines “help protect you from getting severe illness” and “offer good protection against most COVID-19 variants,” pointing in part to observational data from the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) that estimate the vaccines provide poor protection against symptomatic infection and transient shielding against hospitalization.

There have also been increasing concerns among outside scientists about confirmed side effects like heart inflammation—the VA hid a safety signal it detected for the inflammation—and possible side effects such as tinnitus, which shift the benefit-risk calculus.

President Joe Biden imposed a slate of COVID-19 vaccine mandates in 2021. The VA was the first federal agency to implement a mandate.

President Biden rescinded the mandates in May 2023, citing a drop in COVID-19 cases and hospitalizations. His administration maintains the choice to require vaccines was the right one and saved lives.

“Our administration’s vaccination requirements helped ensure the safety of workers in critical workforces including those in the healthcare and education sectors, protecting themselves and the populations they serve, and strengthening their ability to provide services without disruptions to operations,” the White House said.

Some experts said requiring vaccination meant many younger people were forced to get a vaccine despite the risks potentially outweighing the benefits, leaving fewer doses for older adults.

By mandating the vaccines to younger people and those with natural immunity from having had COVID, older people in the U.S. and other countries did not have access to them, and many people might have died because of that,” Martin Kulldorff, a professor of medicine on leave from Harvard Medical School, told The Epoch Times previously.

The VA was one of just a handful of agencies to keep its mandate in place following the removal of many federal mandates.

“At this time, the vaccine requirement will remain in effect for VA health care personnel, including VA psychologists, pharmacists, social workers, nursing assistants, physical therapists, respiratory therapists, peer specialists, medical support assistants, engineers, housekeepers, and other clinical, administrative, and infrastructure support employees,” Mr. McDonough wrote to VA employees at the time.

This also includes VA volunteers and contractors. Effectively, this means that any Veterans Health Administration (VHA) employee, volunteer, or contractor who works in VHA facilities, visits VHA facilities, or provides direct care to those we serve will still be subject to the vaccine requirement at this time,” he said. “We continue to monitor and discuss this requirement, and we will provide more information about the vaccination requirements for VA health care employees soon. As always, we will process requests for vaccination exceptions in accordance with applicable laws, regulations, and policies.”

The version of the shots cleared in the fall of 2022, and available through the fall of 2023, did not have any clinical trial data supporting them.

A new version was approved in the fall of 2023 because there were indications that the shots not only offered temporary protection but also that the level of protection was lower than what was observed during earlier stages of the pandemic.

Ms. Manookian, whose group has challenged several of the federal mandates, said that the mandate “illustrates the dangers of the administrative state and how these federal agencies have become a law unto themselves.”

Tyler Durden Sat, 03/09/2024 - 22:10

Read More

Continue Reading

Trending