Connect with us

Crescat Capital: China’s the biggest bubble in the world today the biggest credit bubble and currency bubble, and yet we also have the biggest equity stock market bubble here too

Crescat Capital: China’s the biggest bubble in the world today the biggest credit bubble and currency bubble, and yet we also have the biggest equity stock market bubble here too

Published

on

Crescat Kevin Smith Of Crescat Capital

ValueWalk’s Raul Panganiban interviews Crescat Capital’s Kevin Smith And Tavi Costa, discussing their trade of the century idea. In this part, Tavi and Kevin discuss the passive investing bubble and the ETF industry, the sectors which are not in a bubble, and their portfolio construction process.

Q4 2019 hedge fund letters, conferences and more

Raul Panganiban: Yeah. On the passive investing bubble isn’t for the market cap weighted indexes, or is that for the ETF industry as a whole?

Crescat Capital’s Kevin Smith And Tavi Costa

Kevin Smith: Well, it’s, it’s really for the stock market as a whole and certainly the ETF industry is part of that the market cap and weighted indices are part of that. You know, it’s interesting to look at you know, that’s why we we like to look at things like median stock prices and median EV to sales, for instance, in the s&p 500 is is something that is more than twice what it was at the tech bubble peak.

A lot of people like Tavi look at [inaudible] doesn’t it doesn’t include debt and the capital structure of the corporation will record corporate leverage today the you know, it’s it’s interesting because in the market cap weighted indices and ETFs that you know a lot of the companies that has been generated and that it become the most overweighted there are ones that have been generating strong positive free cash flow and and earnings and and maybe don’t have as much debt.

You know the the FANG stocks and apples of the world and yet and you know but they’re also record profit margins and and they’re they’re cyclical companies too and so it makes valuations appear lower than they really are when you when you have those market cap weighted giants skewing things and that’s why we like to look at things like median EV to sales which includes dead it takes, it takes margin out which are cyclical out of the picture of profit margins.

And you know, but you know but we don’t just look at that you know, we’ve got eight eight different indicators that valuation indicators that in their composite show that we are the most recently reached the most record overvalued stock market here in the in the US ever and you know, it’s kind of interesting because we say with China’s the biggest bubble in the world today the biggest credit bubble and currency bubble, and yet we also have the biggest, you know, equity stock market bubble here too and, and so, you know, it forces us to be tactical bears right now and and that doesn’t mean that we’re not going to be to be buying things but we think there’s much lower prices ahead.

Tavi Costa: And when you look at specifically to sector two, I mean, they’ll the brass of the market has never been so frothy and then you can look at that by separating into sectors and an EV to sales aggregate ratio or median as well and we see there is that in during the tech bubble you had the technology sector was probably predominantly the problem at the time and you have the communication surfaces sector was also a problem industrials is also problem back then, and then in no way or I should say.

06-07 was more not so much in the sector was more than banking, and some home builders were extremely frothy at the time but today when it looked at there’s eight out of 11 sectors today they’re at record valuations. In other words, they’re above the 90 percentile historically of the EV to sales in aggregate.

So, you know, we look at that it certainly has to do with that passive investing phenomena. And I think that it’s it’s it’s going to be brutal when when the whole when the whole thing unfolds, and I just started I think when if we get back to markets or work as a pendulum cynical back usually just for the median valuation, they go back even further than that. And that’s what we’ve seen throughout history when when, when there is a real market crash.

So I think that it’s the possibility for the client that is over the medium reversion which medium reversion just means another 50% or so declined, and I think it’s possibility for even further declines is very high. So especially given that that broth or that breath of of market frothiness in general so.

Raul Panganiban: And you know, with like the ETF market blowing up in different Yeah, like thematic ETFs, and everything’s being wrapped up in a passive way. Are we gonna start seeing those kind of just in a way like not really not as much launches going forward, and then more than consolidating and falling also?

Kevin Smith: Well, perhaps, I mean, I think that, you know, it’s interesting that that, you know, the few sectors that that aren’t in a bubble today its financials and, and, and health care and energy. And, and and so, you know that you know, each each you know, each cycle is different and that, you know, the housing bubble was was a financial sector bubble, the banking bubble, the subprime bubble here and it and, you know, we’ve kind of been through that war

Kevin Smith: So, when you talk about fighting the last war, I don’t know that I think that the banks here in the US and the, you know, in the brokerage industry and the, I don’t know about the investment industry, but the, the, you know, maybe not going to be as as you know, we’ll survive and what we’ve learned with the fit You know with the federal with the Federal Reserve coming in and the more likelihood of seen a fiscal response this time around I think we are going to try to save the financial system you know you know in a way that that will keep the financial system alive.

But it won’t prevent it from from will prevent stock prices from from declining you know by by a lot and and it adds it and you know, an interesting dynamic to the precious metals because you know what you talked about fighting the last war and we get this objection so much that aren’t aren’t precious metal stocks also going to get get slaughtered and silver and even gold when when the downturn happens and we’ve already started to see that over the past couple of weeks with with with precious metal stock prices coming down 25% or so already, and they were down.

Like more than twice as much as that in that in that little window in Late 2008. And so, but I think what’s what’s unique this time is the Fed is obviously much more eager to come in sooner. This whole idea of of them coming in after the repo crisis, actually they people thought they were going to preempt the downturn and it just created an even bigger bubble.

But you know, we got the panics 50% you know, rate cut, we could go or whenever it was, and then and then the wheels really came off. But, if this fit, you know, the point is, there is an alternative to to stocks, even on the long side, and we think it’s precious metals, and it’s not likely to have as big of a interim correction today as it did in 2008. Because the Fed is going to become coming in. We are going to have fiscal response and we think that’s just even more dynamic for the precious metals.

But the other the other industries are you know as Tavi said there’s eight of them that are record high historical valuations relative to their own historical multiples and you know, and and some people think they can hide it hide out in utilities for instance, because utilities are defensive sector utilities are actually the most overvalued sector in our model relative to their own history relative to fundamentals and mean just they look like Chinese companies, you know, just bleeding negative free cash flow, massive debt.

And people are, are, are, are chasing these things like their defences, well, they go down in every business cycle, they go down. In deflationary depressions, they go down and inflationary recessions and and we see massive dividend cuts ahead for the utility industries of people. Chasing because they they yield more than, than then treasury bonds, but we see dividend cuts ahead for that space.

 

Tavi Costa: Not also one thing we haven’t touched that is the private equity industry in general, you know that you have venture capital activity as being, you know, completely fading as being plunging. There’s a barometer from Bloomberg that looks at the activity is, you know, through volumes in dollar volumes, there’s an exit deals, there’s a number of deals, and you looked at that itself. 50% is June of 2019. It really started when you had that we work of failing situation, back in June and, and also, at a time when we had a tonne of the IPO, failing failing stories like Uber and Lyft. And beyond me, it was a big one as well at the time.

Now watch what’s going on with with with high yields and leveraged loans and you’re seeing, you know, again, the cost of capital rising, CEOs rising right now it’s getting costly to fund those those money losing businesses. Those are businesses that would never exist probably in other decades were the cost of capital was much higher, like in the 70s or so.

And that if you remember, I mean, what’s been kind of propping up the market has been buybacks and financial engineering. And I think that if yields begin to rise, as we’ve seen now, I think it’s going to be it’s going to be possible to to continue to prop up equity markets to levels that we’ve seen so far. So I think this is the beginning of a bear market for for equity markets overall. And but and not just not just for the public market, but private equity too.

And I think private equity started last year and now public market is catching up to that now, and you know, the cheap money is drying out very quickly here and I think that investors may or may is starting to wake up To the risks that we’re seeing that we’ve been talking about for some time now. This this volatility that we saw recently, it really was a regime change of for the equity markets. And I think it’s, it’s only going to get worse as we go through here.

Kevin Smith: Yeah, I was talking to a pension consultant recently in an eat and he was saying that, while the the, you know, the pension funds that I consult to me, they’re going to be fine because they own a lot of private equity. And, you know, it’s, you know, you know, it’s going to be it’s one of the most illiquid asset classes that there is and as the overall stock market declines and pension funds are, are hurting and you know, and people are trying to get the money out of the market some. That’s just one, one sector that we see a lot of problems ahead as the tide goes out.

Raul Panganiban: The private equity, also the private debt market, you’re seeing deteriorating conditions there, as well?

Kevin Smith: Yes. Oh, well, one of our short positions and the global macro fund is, you know, our put options on on high yield bond ETFs. And, that’s, you know, credit spreads, have corporate data has a record tight or close to record tight and, and, you know, that’s just another unwind that will be a part of the of this downturn in the corporate debts at record record highs. And for the US at large, and a lot of that has been a private equity buyout binge. You know, they’re, you know, that’s just part of the business cycle that we’re going to have to see turned down.

Raul Panganiban: Yeah, so can you tell me about your portfolio construction process? And how you manage all your ideas? And how do you wait your How do you position your best ideas?

Kevin Smith: Okay, so we have a bit the thematic process applies to all four of our strategies here at crest scat and and we, you know, we’ll wait are our themes based upon our conviction in those themes and we use now we use models to help us do the risk weighting on it’s not I wish it were our own model that we came up with but on that one, but we’re happy just to use the Bloomberg conditional value at risk model for that because it’s it’s it’s a convenient mathematical way just kind of different and unique from from how we how we pick the pick the securities in the first place.

We have limits that we that we adhere to, not that we can’t you know not that those are settings don’t, but we we try to be very transparent about about how we, how we set those those limits. And and it helps us you know, to it forces us to not get too out of control when it comes to taking risk.

Kevin Smith: But we are willing to take risk in order to see the return ultimate returns from our ideas come to fruition. And you know, and that means that we do we do take a little bit more risk than your average global macro hedge fund out there and even long short or long short fund. In our long only strategies like our large cap strategy, it also means when we’re when we’re as tactically bearish as we are today that we’re not we can have up to 50% cash in the portfolio and we do we have 50% cash in our long only equity strategy. So it’s a tactical, global, macro oriented long only equity value strategy.

And then large cap and we could, if we can’t find a lot of things to buy, we don’t have a lot of things to buy outside of three healthcare stocks, one tech stock and about about eight different precious metals, mining companies, you know, we have a lot of cash and we can we can do that. So, so it’s a genetic attribution, it’s using the C virus model, it’s been able to be flexible and tactical. And that’s how we manage risk.

Tavi Costa: Yes, through the quad models of fundamental and macro models that we that really helps to generate ideas but not so much in a systematic way. But But, you know, the models are key though they serve as a guide to really identify where we are in the cycle and but discipline is you know, plays an important role in the process too, with respect to signals that they generate and but both value a lot of the human power to To kind of disentangle this the market narrative overall and we work intensively on refreshing the portfolio.

 

I would say especially Kevin Smith does a lot of that, looking at, you know, each of the positions and make sure that that, that there are better models are in line with in terms of the the ranking of those positions that we have in terms of the model, that, you know, that, that they’re so supported by those, that those tools and in I tend to focus a little more in the narrative side of the macro side and, and that, you know, plays great as a team and, but identifying the big macro trends, as they said is huge.

And sometimes a lot of those are driven by crediting balances as we’ve seen in places like China today. But it’s finding a lot of the, you know, from a position perspective is making sure we still have a very directional play, but in a diversified way still, and so in other words, rather than just being long gold, as a You know, finding a lot of different ways that you can find asymmetric bets on precious metals overall, regardless if it is to a selective basket of mining stocks or call options on gold or call options and platinum when it when it’s the right time to do it, silver and so forth.

See the full interview with kevin smith and Tavi Costa on ValueWalkPremium

The post Crescat Capital: China’s the biggest bubble in the world today the biggest credit bubble and currency bubble, and yet we also have the biggest equity stock market bubble here too appeared first on ValueWalk.

Read More

Continue Reading

Government

Mistakes Were Made

Mistakes Were Made

Authored by C.J.Hopkins via The Consent Factory,

Make fun of the Germans all you want, and I’ve certainly done that…

Published

on

Mistakes Were Made

Authored by C.J.Hopkins via The Consent Factory,

Make fun of the Germans all you want, and I’ve certainly done that a bit during these past few years, but, if there’s one thing they’re exceptionally good at, it’s taking responsibility for their mistakes. Seriously, when it comes to acknowledging one’s mistakes, and not rationalizing, or minimizing, or attempting to deny them, and any discomfort they may have allegedly caused, no one does it quite like the Germans.

Take this Covid mess, for example. Just last week, the German authorities confessed that they made a few minor mistakes during their management of the “Covid pandemic.” According to Karl Lauterbach, the Minister of Health, “we were sometimes too strict with the children and probably started easing the restrictions a little too late.” Horst Seehofer, the former Interior Minister, admitted that he would no longer agree to some of the Covid restrictions today, for example, nationwide nighttime curfews. “One must be very careful with calls for compulsory vaccination,” he added. Helge Braun, Head of the Chancellery and Minister for Special Affairs under Merkel, agreed that there had been “misjudgments,” for example, “overestimating the effectiveness of the vaccines.”

This display of the German authorities’ unwavering commitment to transparency and honesty, and the principle of personal honor that guides the German authorities in all their affairs, and that is deeply ingrained in the German character, was published in a piece called “The Divisive Virus” in Der Spiegel, and immediately widely disseminated by the rest of the German state and corporate media in a totally organic manner which did not in any way resemble one enormous Goebbelsian keyboard instrument pumping out official propaganda in perfect synchronization, or anything creepy and fascistic like that.

Germany, after all, is “an extremely democratic state,” with freedom of speech and the press and all that, not some kind of totalitarian country where the masses are inundated with official propaganda and critics of the government are dragged into criminal court and prosecuted on trumped-up “hate crime” charges.

OK, sure, in a non-democratic totalitarian system, such public “admissions of mistakes” — and the synchronized dissemination thereof by the media — would just be a part of the process of whitewashing the authorities’ fascistic behavior during some particularly totalitarian phase of transforming society into whatever totalitarian dystopia they were trying to transform it into (for example, a three-year-long “state of emergency,” which they declared to keep the masses terrorized and cooperative while they stripped them of their democratic rights, i.e., the ones they hadn’t already stripped them of, and conditioned them to mindlessly follow orders, and robotically repeat nonsensical official slogans, and vent their impotent hatred and fear at the new “Untermenschen” or “counter-revolutionaries”), but that is obviously not the case here.

No, this is definitely not the German authorities staging a public “accountability” spectacle in order to memory-hole what happened during 2020-2023 and enshrine the official narrative in history. There’s going to be a formal “Inquiry Commission” — conducted by the same German authorities that managed the “crisis” — which will get to the bottom of all the regrettable but completely understandable “mistakes” that were made in the heat of the heroic battle against The Divisive Virus!

OK, calm down, all you “conspiracy theorists,” “Covid deniers,” and “anti-vaxxers.” This isn’t going to be like the Nuremberg Trials. No one is going to get taken out and hanged. It’s about identifying and acknowledging mistakes, and learning from them, so that the authorities can manage everything better during the next “pandemic,” or “climate emergency,” or “terrorist attack,” or “insurrection,” or whatever.

For example, the Inquiry Commission will want to look into how the government accidentally declared a Nationwide State of Pandemic Emergency and revised the Infection Protection Act, suspending the German constitution and granting the government the power to rule by decree, on account of a respiratory virus that clearly posed no threat to society at large, and then unleashed police goon squads on the thousands of people who gathered outside the Reichstag to protest the revocation of their constitutional rights.

Once they do, I’m sure they’ll find that that “mistake” bears absolutely no resemblance to the Enabling Act of 1933, which suspended the German constitution and granted the government the power to rule by decree, after the Nazis declared a nationwide “state of emergency.”

Another thing the Commission will probably want to look into is how the German authorities accidentally banned any further demonstrations against their arbitrary decrees, and ordered the police to brutalize anyone participating in such “illegal demonstrations.”

And, while the Commission is inquiring into the possibly slightly inappropriate behavior of their law enforcement officials, they might want to also take a look at the behavior of their unofficial goon squads, like Antifa, which they accidentally encouraged to attack the “anti-vaxxers,” the “Covid deniers,” and anyone brandishing a copy of the German constitution.

Come to think of it, the Inquiry Commission might also want to look into how the German authorities, and the overwhelming majority of the state and corporate media, accidentally systematically fomented mass hatred of anyone who dared to question the government’s arbitrary and nonsensical decrees or who refused to submit to “vaccination,” and publicly demonized us as “Corona deniers,” “conspiracy theorists,” “anti-vaxxers,” “far-right anti-Semites,” etc., to the point where mainstream German celebrities like Sarah Bosetti were literally describing us as the inessential “appendix” in the body of the nation, quoting an infamous Nazi almost verbatim.

And then there’s the whole “vaccination” business. The Commission will certainly want to inquire into that. They will probably want to start their inquiry with Karl Lauterbach, and determine exactly how he accidentally lied to the public, over and over, and over again …

And whipped people up into a mass hysteria over “KILLER VARIANTS” …

And “LONG COVID BRAIN ATTACKS” …

And how “THE UNVACCINATED ARE HOLDING THE WHOLE COUNTRY HOSTAGE, SO WE NEED TO FORCIBLY VACCINATE EVERYONE!”

And so on. I could go on with this all day, but it will be much easier to just refer you, and the Commission, to this documentary film by Aya Velázquez. Non-German readers may want to skip to the second half, unless they’re interested in the German “Corona Expert Council” …

Look, the point is, everybody makes “mistakes,” especially during a “state of emergency,” or a war, or some other type of global “crisis.” At least we can always count on the Germans to step up and take responsibility for theirs, and not claim that they didn’t know what was happening, or that they were “just following orders,” or that “the science changed.”

Plus, all this Covid stuff is ancient history, and, as Olaf, an editor at Der Spiegel, reminds us, it’s time to put the “The Divisive Pandemic” behind us …

… and click heels, and heil the New Normal Democracy!

Tyler Durden Sat, 03/16/2024 - 23:20

Read More

Continue Reading

Government

Harvard Medical School Professor Was Fired Over Not Getting COVID Vaccine

Harvard Medical School Professor Was Fired Over Not Getting COVID Vaccine

Authored by Zachary Stieber via The Epoch Times (emphasis ours),

A…

Published

on

Harvard Medical School Professor Was Fired Over Not Getting COVID Vaccine

Authored by Zachary Stieber via The Epoch Times (emphasis ours),

A Harvard Medical School professor who refused to get a COVID-19 vaccine has been terminated, according to documents reviewed by The Epoch Times.

Martin Kulldorff, epidemiologist and statistician, at his home in Ashford, Conn., on Feb. 11, 2022. (Samira Bouaou/The Epoch Times)

Martin Kulldorff, an epidemiologist, was fired by Mass General Brigham in November 2021 over noncompliance with the hospital’s COVID-19 vaccine mandate after his requests for exemptions from the mandate were denied, according to one document. Mr. Kulldorff was also placed on leave by Harvard Medical School (HMS) because his appointment as professor of medicine there “depends upon” holding a position at the hospital, another document stated.

Mr. Kulldorff asked HMS in late 2023 how he could return to his position and was told he was being fired.

You would need to hold an eligible appointment with a Harvard-affiliated institution for your HMS academic appointment to continue,” Dr. Grace Huang, dean for faculty affairs, told the epidemiologist and biostatistician.

She said the lack of an appointment, combined with college rules that cap leaves of absence at two years, meant he was being terminated.

Mr. Kulldorff disclosed the firing for the first time this month.

“While I can’t comment on the specifics due to employment confidentiality protections that preclude us from doing so, I can confirm that his employment agreement was terminated November 10, 2021,” a spokesperson for Brigham and Women’s Hospital told The Epoch Times via email.

Mass General Brigham granted just 234 exemption requests out of 2,402 received, according to court filings in an ongoing case that alleges discrimination.

The hospital said previously, “We received a number of exemption requests, and each request was carefully considered by a knowledgeable team of reviewers.

A lot of other people received exemptions, but I did not,” Mr. Kulldorff told The Epoch Times.

Mr. Kulldorff was originally hired by HMS but switched departments in 2015 to work at the Department of Medicine at Brigham and Women’s Hospital, which is part of Mass General Brigham and affiliated with HMS.

Harvard Medical School has affiliation agreements with several Boston hospitals which it neither owns nor operationally controls,” an HMS spokesperson told The Epoch Times in an email. “Hospital-based faculty, such as Mr. Kulldorff, are employed by one of the affiliates, not by HMS, and require an active hospital appointment to maintain an academic appointment at Harvard Medical School.”

HMS confirmed that some faculty, who are tenured or on the tenure track, do not require hospital appointments.

Natural Immunity

Before the COVID-19 vaccines became available, Mr. Kulldorff contracted COVID-19. He was hospitalized but eventually recovered.

That gave him a form of protection known as natural immunity. According to a number of studies, including papers from the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, natural immunity is better than the protection bestowed by vaccines.

Other studies have found that people with natural immunity face a higher risk of problems after vaccination.

Mr. Kulldorff expressed his concerns about receiving a vaccine in his request for a medical exemption, pointing out a lack of data for vaccinating people who suffer from the same issue he does.

I already had superior infection-acquired immunity; and it was risky to vaccinate me without proper efficacy and safety studies on patients with my type of immune deficiency,” Mr. Kulldorff wrote in an essay.

In his request for a religious exemption, he highlighted an Israel study that was among the first to compare protection after infection to protection after vaccination. Researchers found that the vaccinated had less protection than the naturally immune.

“Having had COVID disease, I have stronger longer lasting immunity than those vaccinated (Gazit et al). Lacking scientific rationale, vaccine mandates are religious dogma, and I request a religious exemption from COVID vaccination,” he wrote.

Both requests were denied.

Mr. Kulldorff is still unvaccinated.

“I had COVID. I had it badly. So I have infection-acquired immunity. So I don’t need the vaccine,” he told The Epoch Times.

Dissenting Voice

Mr. Kulldorff has been a prominent dissenting voice during the COVID-19 pandemic, countering messaging from the government and many doctors that the COVID-19 vaccines were needed, regardless of prior infection.

He spoke out in an op-ed in April 2021, for instance, against requiring people to provide proof of vaccination to attend shows, go to school, and visit restaurants.

The idea that everybody needs to be vaccinated is as scientifically baseless as the idea that nobody does. Covid vaccines are essential for older, high-risk people and their caretakers and advisable for many others. But those who’ve been infected are already immune,” he wrote at the time.

Mr. Kulldorff later co-authored the Great Barrington Declaration, which called for focused protection of people at high risk while removing restrictions for younger, healthy people.

Harsh restrictions such as school closures “will cause irreparable damage” if not lifted, the declaration stated.

The declaration drew criticism from Dr. Anthony Fauci, head of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, and Dr. Rochelle Walensky, who became the head of the CDC, among others.

In a competing document, Dr. Walensky and others said that “relying upon immunity from natural infections for COVID-19 is flawed” and that “uncontrolled transmission in younger people risks significant morbidity(3) and mortality across the whole population.”

“Those who are pushing these vaccine mandates and vaccine passports—vaccine fanatics, I would call them—to me they have done much more damage during this one year than the anti-vaxxers have done in two decades,” Mr. Kulldorff later said in an EpochTV interview. “I would even say that these vaccine fanatics, they are the biggest anti-vaxxers that we have right now. They’re doing so much more damage to vaccine confidence than anybody else.

Surveys indicate that people have less trust now in the CDC and other health institutions than before the pandemic, and data from the CDC and elsewhere show that fewer people are receiving the new COVID-19 vaccines and other shots.

Support

The disclosure that Mr. Kulldorff was fired drew criticism of Harvard and support for Mr. Kulldorff.

The termination “is a massive and incomprehensible injustice,” Dr. Aaron Kheriaty, an ethics expert who was fired from the University of California–Irvine School of Medicine for not getting a COVID-19 vaccine because he had natural immunity, said on X.

The academy is full of people who declined vaccines—mostly with dubious exemptions—and yet Harvard fires the one professor who happens to speak out against government policies.” Dr. Vinay Prasad, an epidemiologist at the University of California–San Francisco, wrote in a blog post. “It looks like Harvard has weaponized its policies and selectively enforces them.”

A petition to reinstate Mr. Kulldorff has garnered more than 1,800 signatures.

Some other doctors said the decision to let Mr. Kulldorff go was correct.

“Actions have consequence,” Dr. Alastair McAlpine, a Canadian doctor, wrote on X. He said Mr. Kulldorff had “publicly undermine[d] public health.”

Tyler Durden Sat, 03/16/2024 - 21:00

Read More

Continue Reading

Uncategorized

Correcting the Washington Post’s 11 Charts That Are Supposed to Tell Us How the Economy Changed Since Covid

The Washington Post made some serious errors or omissions in its 11 charts that are supposed to tell us how Covid changed the economy. Wages Starting with…

Published

on

The Washington Post made some serious errors or omissions in its 11 charts that are supposed to tell us how Covid changed the economy.

Wages

Starting with its second chart, the article gives us an index of average weekly wages since 2019. The index shows a big jump in 2020, which then falls off in 2021 and 2022, before rising again in 2023.

It tells readers:

“Many Americans got large pay increases after the pandemic, when employers were having to one-up each other to find and keep workers. For a while, those wage gains were wiped out by decade-high inflation: Workers were getting larger paychecks, but it wasn’t enough to keep up with rising prices.”

That actually is not what its chart shows. The big rise in average weekly wages at the start of the pandemic was not the result of workers getting pay increases, it was the result of low-paid workers in sectors like hotels and restaurants losing their jobs.

The number of people employed in the low-paying leisure and hospitality sector fell by more than 8 million at the start of the pandemic. Even at the start of 2021 it was still down by over 4 million.

Laying off low-paid workers raises average wages in the same way that getting the short people to leave raises the average height of the people in the room. The Washington Post might try to tell us that the remaining people grew taller, but that is not what happened.

The other problem with this chart is that it is giving us weekly wages. The length of the average workweek jumped at the start of the pandemic as employers decided to work the workers they had longer hours rather than hire more workers. In January of 2021 the average workweek was 34.9 hours, compared to 34.4 hours in 2019 and 34.3 hours in February.

This increase in hours, by itself, would raise weekly pay by 2.0 percent. As hours returned to normal in 2022, this measure would misleadingly imply that wages were falling.

It is also worth noting that the fastest wage gains since the pandemic have been at the bottom end of the wage distribution and the Black/white wage gap has fallen to its lowest level on record.

Saving Rates

The third chart shows the saving rate since 2019. It shows a big spike at the start of the pandemic, as people stopped spending on things like restaurants and travel and they got pandemic checks from the government. It then falls sharply in 2022 and is lower in the most recent quarters than in 2019.

The piece tells readers:

“But as the world reopened — and people resumed spending on dining out, travel, concerts and other things that were previously off-limits — savings rates have leveled off. Americans are also increasingly dip into rainy-day funds to pay more for necessities, including groceries, housing, education and health care. In fact, Americans are now generally saving less of their incomes than they were before the pandemic.

This is an incomplete picture due to a somewhat technical issue. As I explained in a blogpost a few months ago, there is an unusually large gap between GDP as measured on the output side and GDP measured on the income side. In principle, these two numbers should be the same, but they never come out exactly equal.

In recent quarters, the gap has been 2.5 percent of GDP. This is extraordinarily large, but it also is unusual in that the output side is higher than the income side, the opposite of the standard pattern over the last quarter century.

It is standard for economists to assume that the true number for GDP is somewhere between the two measures. If we make that assumption about the data for 2023, it would imply that income is somewhat higher than the data now show and consumption somewhat lower.

In that story, as I showed in the blogpost, the saving rate for 2023 would be 6.8 percent of disposable income, roughly the same as the average for the three years before the pandemic. This would mean that people are not dipping into their rainy-day funds as the Post tells us. They are spending pretty much as they did before the pandemic.

 

Credit Card Debt

The next graph shows that credit card debt is rising again, after sinking in the pandemic. The piece tells readers:

“But now, debt loads are swinging higher again as families try to keep up with rising prices. Total household debt reached a record $17.5 trillion at the end of 2023, according to the Federal Reserve Bank of New York. And, in a worrisome sign for the economy, delinquency rates on mortgages, car loans and credit cards are all rising, too.”

There are several points worth noting here. Credit card debt is rising, but measured relative to income it is still below where it was before the pandemic. It was 6.7 percent of disposable income at the end of 2019, compared to 6.5 percent at the end of last year.

The second point is that a major reason for the recent surge in credit card debt is that people are no longer refinancing mortgages. There was a massive surge in mortgage refinancing with the low interest rates in 2020-2021.

Many of the people who refinanced took additional money out, taking advantage of the increased equity in their home. This channel of credit was cut off when mortgage rates jumped in 2022 and virtually ended mortgage refinancing. This means that to a large extent the surge in credit card borrowing is simply a shift from mortgage debt to credit card debt.

The point about total household debt hitting a record can be said in most months. Except in the period immediately following the collapse of the housing bubble, total debt is almost always rising.

And the rise in delinquencies simply reflects the fact that they had been at very low levels in 2021 and 2022. For the most part, delinquency rates are just getting back to their pre-pandemic levels, which were historically low.  

 

Grocery Prices and Gas Prices

The next two charts show the patterns in grocery prices and gas prices since the pandemic. It would have been worth mentioning that every major economy in the world saw similar run-ups in prices in these two areas. In other words, there was nothing specific to U.S. policy that led to a surge in inflation here.

 

The Missing Charts

There are several areas where it would have been interesting to see charts which the Post did not include. It would have been useful to have a chart on job quitters, the number of people who voluntarily quit their jobs during the pandemic. In the tight labor markets of 2021 and 2022 the number of workers who left jobs they didn’t like soared to record levels, as shown below.

 

The vast majority of these workers took other jobs that they liked better. This likely explains another item that could appear as a graph, the record level of job satisfaction.

In a similar vein there has been an explosion in the number of people who work from home at least part-time. This has increased by more than 17 million during the pandemic. These workers are saving themselves thousands of dollars a year on commuting costs and related expenses, as well as hundreds of hours spent commuting.

Finally, there has been an explosion in the use of telemedicine since the pandemic. At the peak, nearly one in four visits with a health care professional was a remote consultation. This saved many people with serious health issues the time and inconvenience associated with a trip to a hospital or doctor’s office. The increased use of telemedicine is likely to be a lasting gain from the pandemic.

 

The World Has Changed

The pandemic will likely have a lasting impact on the economy and society. The Washington Post’s charts captured part of this story, but in some cases misrepr

The post Correcting the Washington Post’s 11 Charts That Are Supposed to Tell Us How the Economy Changed Since Covid appeared first on Center for Economic and Policy Research.

Read More

Continue Reading

Trending