Connect with us

Uncategorized

Best January since 2013? 5 things to know in Bitcoin this week

Multi-month BTC price highs keep trickling in, but Fed volatility looms as the FOMC coincides with the Bitcoin monthly candle close.

Published

on

Multi-month BTC price highs keep trickling in, but Fed volatility looms as the FOMC coincides with the Bitcoin monthly candle close.

Bitcoin (BTC) starts a key week with a familiar cocktail of price spikes mixed with fear that the bear market will return.

After sealing its highest weekly close in almost six months, BTC/USD remains over 40% up year-to-date with the monthly close just 48 hours away — can the gains hold?

Against all odds, Bitcoin has rallied beyond expectations this month, making January 2023 so far its best in a decade.

Throughout, concerns have called for an imminent comedown and even new macro BTC price lows as a state of disbelief swept the market.

That grim turnaround has yet to come to fruition, however, and the coming days could thus turn out to be a crucial period when it comes to Bitcoin’s long-term trend.

The catalysts are hardly in short supply — the United States Federal Reserve will decide on its next rate hike this week, with Chair Jerome Powell also giving much anticipated commentary on the economy and policy.

The European Central Bank (ECB) will make the same decision a day later.

Add to that the psychological pressure of the monthly close and it is easy to see how the coming week could be one of the more volatile in Bitcoin’s recent history.

Buckle up as Cointelegraph takes a look at five key issues to consider when it comes to BTC price action.

Bitcoin price eyes $24K with FOMC volatility predicted

Bitcoin continues to defy naysayers and shorters alike by spiking ever higher on lower timeframes.

The weekend proved no different to others in January, with BTC/USD hitting $23,950 overnight into Jan. 30 — a new five-and-a-half-month high.

The weekly close achieved the same feat, Bitcoin nonetheless failing to tackle the $24,000 mark for a final flourish.

BTC/USD 1-week candle chart (Bitstamp). Source: TradingView

At the time of writing, $23,700 formed a focal point, data from Cointelegraph Markets Pro and TradingView showed, with U.S. markets yet to begin trading.

Nonetheless, at current prices, Bitcoin remains up a striking 43.1% in January, making it the best month of January since 2013 — Bitcoin’s first well-known bull market year.

BTC/USD monthly returns chart (screenshot). Source: Coinglass

Market analysts are meanwhile keen to see what will happen around the Fed rate hike decision on Feb. 1. A classic source of volatility, the event could impact the monthly candle significantly, only for BTC price action to change tack altogether soon afterward.

“Perhaps with a little assistance from FOMC volatility? Not a prediction, but certainly a trade setup I'd be very interested in,” popular trader Crypto Chase commented on a chart predicting a retracement followed by further upside for BTC/USD.

BTC/USD annotated chart. Source: Crypto Chase/ Twitter

That roadmap took Bitcoin over $25,000, itself a key target for traders — even those who remain wary of a mass capitulation event extinguishing January’s extraordinary performance.

Among them is Crypto Tony, who notes the proximity of $25,000 to Bitcoin’s 200-week exponential moving average (EMA).

“The 200 Weekly EMA sits right above us at 25,000 which as you know is my target on BTC / Bitcoin,” he told Twitter followers on Jan. 29.

“Now flipping the 200 EMA and range high into support is massive for the bulls, but we have yet to do this and people are already euphoric. Think about that.”

An accompanying chart still laid out a potential path downhill toward $15,000.

As Cointelegraph reported at the weekend, Il Capo of Crypto, the trader now famous for his misgivings about the recovery, remains short BTC.

Continuing, on-chain analytics resource Material Indicators defined $24,000 as an important zone for bulls to flip to support, along with the 50-day and 200-day simple moving averages (SMAs).

“If bulls break $24k expecting upside illiquidity to get exploited up to the range of technical resistance ahead of the Feb 1 FED EoY terminal rate projection. What JPow says will move markets,” part of commentary on bid and ask levels on the Binance order book read this weekend.

Material Indicators referenced Fed Chair Powell’s forthcoming words, also noting that bid liquidity had been shifted higher, causing spot price to edge closer to that key area.

BTC/USD order book chart (Binance). Source: Material Indicators/ Twitter

Macro hinges on Fed rate hike, Powell

The coming week is set to be dominated by the Federal Reserve’s interest rate hike and accompanying comments from Chair Jerome Powell.

In a familiar but still nerve-racking sequence of events for Bitcoin traders, the Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) will meet on Feb. 1.

The result this time around may offer few surprises, with expectations practically unanimous in predicting a 25-basis-point hike. Nonetheless, the scope for volatility around the unveiling remains.

“The first two days of Feb are going to be volatile (much fun),” trader and commentator Pentoshi tweeted in part of comments last week, also noting that the FOMC would be followed by a similar decision from the European Central Bank a day later.

According to CME Group’s FedWatch Tool, there is currently 98.4% consensus that the Fed will hike by 25 basis points.

This will be a further reduction compared to other recent moves, and the smallest upward adjustment since March 2022.

Fed target rate probabilities chart. Source: CME Group

“Wouldn't be surprised if markets pumped all week ahead of the FOMC announcements,” popular social media commentator Satoshi Flipper continued.

“We already know it's 25 BP. So what is there even remaining for J Powell to give guidance about? Another 25 or 50 BP remaining for the year? My point is regarding rates: the worst is now behind us.”

Should speculators be right in assuming that the Fed will now trend towards halting rate hikes altogether, this would notionally offer long-term breathing space to risk assets across the board, including crypto.

As Cointelegraph continues to report, however, many are worried that the coming year will be anything but plain sailing when it comes to a Fed policy transition. That may only come about, one theory states, when policymakers have no choice but to stop the economic ship from sinking.

Another, from former BitMEX CEO Arthur Hayes, calls for extensive risk asset damage before the Fed is forced to change course, including a $15,000 BTC price.

Continuing the longer-term warnings, Alasdair MacLeod, head of research at Goldmoney, referenced geopolitical tensions surrounding the Russia-Ukraine conflict as a key future risk asset downside trigger.

“No one is thinking through the effect on markets of the resumption of the Ukraine conflict,” he argued, precising a Goldmoney article on Jan. 29.

MacLeod predicted that energy prices would be “sure to spike higher,” along with U.S. inflation estimates.

“Bond yields will rise, equities will fall,” he added.

Index generates first "definitive buy signal" in 4 years

While few pundits are willing to go on record calling an end to the latest Bitcoin bear market, one on-chain metric is potentially leading the way.

The Profit and Loss (PnL) Index from on-chain analytics platform CryptoQuant has issued a “definitive buy signal” for BTC — the first since early 2019.

The PnL Index aims to provide normalized cycle top and bottom signals using combined data from three other on-chain metrics. When its value rises above its one-year moving average, it is taken as a long-term buying opportunity.

This has now occurred with January’s move up in BTC/USD, and while CryptoQuant acknowledges that the situation may flip bearish again, the implications are clear.

“Although it is still possible for the index to fall back below, the CryptoQuant PnL Index has issued a definitive buy signal for BTC, which occurs when the index (dark purple line) climbs above its 365-day moving average (light purple line),” it wrote in a blog post alongside an explanatory chart.

“Historically, the index crossover has signaled the beginning of bull markets.”
Bitcoin PnL Index (screenshot). Source: CryptoQuant

CryptoQuant is not alone in eyeing rare recoveries in on-chain data, some of which were even absent throughout Bitcoin’s trip to all-time highs following the March 2020 COVID-19 crash.

Among them is Bitcoin’s relative strength index (RSI), which has now bounced from its lowest levels ever.

As noted by PlanB, creator of the Stock-to-Flow family of Bitcoin price forecasting models, the last such rebound from macro lows in RSI likewise occurred at the end of Bitcoin's last bear market in early 2019.

Bitcoin RSI chart. Source: PlanB/ Twitter

BTC hodlers stay disciplined

Contrary to expectations, mass profit-taking by the average Bitcoin hodler has yet to kick in.

On-chain data from Glassnode confirms this, with the BTC supply continuing to age despite the recent price gains.

Coins dormant in wallets for five years or more, as a percentage of the overall supply, hit new all-time highs of 27.85% this weekend.

Bitcoin % supply last active 5+ years ago chart. Source: Glassnode/ Twitter

The amount of hodled or lost coins — “large and old stashes” of BTC traditionally dormant — has also reached its highest level in five years.

Bitcoin active supply chart. Source: Glassnode/ Twitter
Bitcoin hodled or lost coins chart. Source: Glassnode/ Twitter

On lower timeframes, meanwhile, the amount of the supply last active in the past 24 hours in fact hit one-month lows on Jan. 29.

Despite this, a feeling of “greed” is rapidly entering into the market psyche, especially among recent investors, data below from CryptoQuant warns.

Sentiment "greediest" since $69,000

What began as disbelief as Bitcoin rose is rapidly becoming a textbook case of market exuberance, non-technical data shows.]

Related: Bitcoin will hit $200K before $70K ‘bear market’ next cycle — Forecast

According to the Crypto Fear & Greed Index, the classic crypto market sentiment indicator, the mood among Bitcoin and altcoin investors is now predominantly one of “greed.”

The Index, which divides sentiment into five categories to identify potential blow-off tops and irrational market bottoms, currently measures 55/100 on its normalized scale.

While still far from its extremes, that score marks the Index’s first trip into “greed” territory since March 2022 and its highest since Bitcoin's November 2021 all-time highs.

On Jan. 1, 2023, it measured 26/100 — less than half its latest reading.

Nonetheless, sentiment, as measured by Fear & Greed, has now erased losses from both FTX and the Terra LUNA meltdown.

Crypto Fear & Greed Index (screenshot). Source: Alternative.me

In a cautious reaction, CryptoQuant contributor warned that sentiment among those only recently entering the market is now echoing the atmosphere of early 2021, when BTC/USD was making new all-time highs on an almost daily basis.

“Sentiment from Bitcoin short-term on-chain participants (short-term SOPR) has reached the greediest level since January 2021,” a blog post read, referencing the spent output profit ratio (SOPR) metric.

“While SOPR trending above 1 indicates a bullish trend, the indicator is way above 1 right now and overly stretched. Without increase in stablecoin reserves on spot exchanges, the bull fuel could run out quickly.”

Among its other uses, SOPR offers insight into when Bitcoin investors may be more inclined to sell after entering profit.

BTC/USD annotated chart (screenshot). Source: CryptoQuant

The views, thoughts and opinions expressed here are the authors’ alone and do not necessarily reflect or represent the views and opinions of Cointelegraph.

Read More

Continue Reading

Uncategorized

February Employment Situation

By Paul Gomme and Peter Rupert The establishment data from the BLS showed a 275,000 increase in payroll employment for February, outpacing the 230,000…

Published

on

By Paul Gomme and Peter Rupert

The establishment data from the BLS showed a 275,000 increase in payroll employment for February, outpacing the 230,000 average over the previous 12 months. The payroll data for January and December were revised down by a total of 167,000. The private sector added 223,000 new jobs, the largest gain since May of last year.

Temporary help services employment continues a steep decline after a sharp post-pandemic rise.

Average hours of work increased from 34.2 to 34.3. The increase, along with the 223,000 private employment increase led to a hefty increase in total hours of 5.6% at an annualized rate, also the largest increase since May of last year.

The establishment report, once again, beat “expectations;” the WSJ survey of economists was 198,000. Other than the downward revisions, mentioned above, another bit of negative news was a smallish increase in wage growth, from $34.52 to $34.57.

The household survey shows that the labor force increased 150,000, a drop in employment of 184,000 and an increase in the number of unemployed persons of 334,000. The labor force participation rate held steady at 62.5, the employment to population ratio decreased from 60.2 to 60.1 and the unemployment rate increased from 3.66 to 3.86. Remember that the unemployment rate is the number of unemployed relative to the labor force (the number employed plus the number unemployed). Consequently, the unemployment rate can go up if the number of unemployed rises holding fixed the labor force, or if the labor force shrinks holding the number unemployed unchanged. An increase in the unemployment rate is not necessarily a bad thing: it may reflect a strong labor market drawing “marginally attached” individuals from outside the labor force. Indeed, there was a 96,000 decline in those workers.

Earlier in the week, the BLS announced JOLTS (Job Openings and Labor Turnover Survey) data for January. There isn’t much to report here as the job openings changed little at 8.9 million, the number of hires and total separations were little changed at 5.7 million and 5.3 million, respectively.

As has been the case for the last couple of years, the number of job openings remains higher than the number of unemployed persons.

Also earlier in the week the BLS announced that productivity increased 3.2% in the 4th quarter with output rising 3.5% and hours of work rising 0.3%.

The bottom line is that the labor market continues its surprisingly (to some) strong performance, once again proving stronger than many had expected. This strength makes it difficult to justify any interest rate cuts soon, particularly given the recent inflation spike.

Read More

Continue Reading

Uncategorized

Mortgage rates fall as labor market normalizes

Jobless claims show an expanding economy. We will only be in a recession once jobless claims exceed 323,000 on a four-week moving average.

Published

on

Everyone was waiting to see if this week’s jobs report would send mortgage rates higher, which is what happened last month. Instead, the 10-year yield had a muted response after the headline number beat estimates, but we have negative job revisions from previous months. The Federal Reserve’s fear of wage growth spiraling out of control hasn’t materialized for over two years now and the unemployment rate ticked up to 3.9%. For now, we can say the labor market isn’t tight anymore, but it’s also not breaking.

The key labor data line in this expansion is the weekly jobless claims report. Jobless claims show an expanding economy that has not lost jobs yet. We will only be in a recession once jobless claims exceed 323,000 on a four-week moving average.

From the Fed: In the week ended March 2, initial claims for unemployment insurance benefits were flat, at 217,000. The four-week moving average declined slightly by 750, to 212,250


Below is an explanation of how we got here with the labor market, which all started during COVID-19.

1. I wrote the COVID-19 recovery model on April 7, 2020, and retired it on Dec. 9, 2020. By that time, the upfront recovery phase was done, and I needed to model out when we would get the jobs lost back.

2. Early in the labor market recovery, when we saw weaker job reports, I doubled and tripled down on my assertion that job openings would get to 10 million in this recovery. Job openings rose as high as to 12 million and are currently over 9 million. Even with the massive miss on a job report in May 2021, I didn’t waver.

Currently, the jobs openings, quit percentage and hires data are below pre-COVID-19 levels, which means the labor market isn’t as tight as it once was, and this is why the employment cost index has been slowing data to move along the quits percentage.  

2-US_Job_Quits_Rate-1-2

3. I wrote that we should get back all the jobs lost to COVID-19 by September of 2022. At the time this would be a speedy labor market recovery, and it happened on schedule, too

Total employment data

4. This is the key one for right now: If COVID-19 hadn’t happened, we would have between 157 million and 159 million jobs today, which would have been in line with the job growth rate in February 2020. Today, we are at 157,808,000. This is important because job growth should be cooling down now. We are more in line with where the labor market should be when averaging 140K-165K monthly. So for now, the fact that we aren’t trending between 140K-165K means we still have a bit more recovery kick left before we get down to those levels. 




From BLS: Total nonfarm payroll employment rose by 275,000 in February, and the unemployment rate increased to 3.9 percent, the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics reported today. Job gains occurred in health care, in government, in food services and drinking places, in social assistance, and in transportation and warehousing.

Here are the jobs that were created and lost in the previous month:

IMG_5092

In this jobs report, the unemployment rate for education levels looks like this:

  • Less than a high school diploma: 6.1%
  • High school graduate and no college: 4.2%
  • Some college or associate degree: 3.1%
  • Bachelor’s degree or higher: 2.2%
IMG_5093_320f22

Today’s report has continued the trend of the labor data beating my expectations, only because I am looking for the jobs data to slow down to a level of 140K-165K, which hasn’t happened yet. I wouldn’t categorize the labor market as being tight anymore because of the quits ratio and the hires data in the job openings report. This also shows itself in the employment cost index as well. These are key data lines for the Fed and the reason we are going to see three rate cuts this year.

Read More

Continue Reading

Uncategorized

Inside The Most Ridiculous Jobs Report In History: Record 1.2 Million Immigrant Jobs Added In One Month

Inside The Most Ridiculous Jobs Report In History: Record 1.2 Million Immigrant Jobs Added In One Month

Last month we though that the January…

Published

on

Inside The Most Ridiculous Jobs Report In History: Record 1.2 Million Immigrant Jobs Added In One Month

Last month we though that the January jobs report was the "most ridiculous in recent history" but, boy, were we wrong because this morning the Biden department of goalseeked propaganda (aka BLS) published the February jobs report, and holy crap was that something else. Even Goebbels would blush. 

What happened? Let's take a closer look.

On the surface, it was (almost) another blockbuster jobs report, certainly one which nobody expected, or rather just one bank out of 76 expected. Starting at the top, the BLS reported that in February the US unexpectedly added 275K jobs, with just one research analyst (from Dai-Ichi Research) expecting a higher number.

Some context: after last month's record 4-sigma beat, today's print was "only" 3 sigma higher than estimates. Needless to say, two multiple sigma beats in a row used to only happen in the USSR... and now in the US, apparently.

Before we go any further, a quick note on what last month we said was "the most ridiculous jobs report in recent history": it appears the BLS read our comments and decided to stop beclowing itself. It did that by slashing last month's ridiculous print by over a third, and revising what was originally reported as a massive 353K beat to just 229K,  a 124K revision, which was the biggest one-month negative revision in two years!

Of course, that does not mean that this month's jobs print won't be revised lower: it will be, and not just that month but every other month until the November election because that's the only tool left in the Biden admin's box: pretend the economic and jobs are strong, then revise them sharply lower the next month, something we pointed out first last summer and which has not failed to disappoint once.

To be fair, not every aspect of the jobs report was stellar (after all, the BLS had to give it some vague credibility). Take the unemployment rate, after flatlining between 3.4% and 3.8% for two years - and thus denying expectations from Sahm's Rule that a recession may have already started - in February the unemployment rate unexpectedly jumped to 3.9%, the highest since February 2022 (with Black unemployment spiking by 0.3% to 5.6%, an indicator which the Biden admin will quickly slam as widespread economic racism or something).

And then there were average hourly earnings, which after surging 0.6% MoM in January (since revised to 0.5%) and spooking markets that wage growth is so hot, the Fed will have no choice but to delay cuts, in February the number tumbled to just 0.1%, the lowest in two years...

... for one simple reason: last month's average wage surge had nothing to do with actual wages, and everything to do with the BLS estimate of hours worked (which is the denominator in the average wage calculation) which last month tumbled to just 34.1 (we were led to believe) the lowest since the covid pandemic...

... but has since been revised higher while the February print rose even more, to 34.3, hence why the latest average wage data was once again a product not of wages going up, but of how long Americans worked in any weekly period, in this case higher from 34.1 to 34.3, an increase which has a major impact on the average calculation.

While the above data points were examples of some latent weakness in the latest report, perhaps meant to give it a sheen of veracity, it was everything else in the report that was a problem starting with the BLS's latest choice of seasonal adjustments (after last month's wholesale revision), which have gone from merely laughable to full clownshow, as the following comparison between the monthly change in BLS and ADP payrolls shows. The trend is clear: the Biden admin numbers are now clearly rising even as the impartial ADP (which directly logs employment numbers at the company level and is far more accurate), shows an accelerating slowdown.

But it's more than just the Biden admin hanging its "success" on seasonal adjustments: when one digs deeper inside the jobs report, all sorts of ugly things emerge... such as the growing unprecedented divergence between the Establishment (payrolls) survey and much more accurate Household (actual employment) survey. To wit, while in January the BLS claims 275K payrolls were added, the Household survey found that the number of actually employed workers dropped for the third straight month (and 4 in the past 5), this time by 184K (from 161.152K to 160.968K).

This means that while the Payrolls series hits new all time highs every month since December 2020 (when according to the BLS the US had its last month of payrolls losses), the level of Employment has not budged in the past year. Worse, as shown in the chart below, such a gaping divergence has opened between the two series in the past 4 years, that the number of Employed workers would need to soar by 9 million (!) to catch up to what Payrolls claims is the employment situation.

There's more: shifting from a quantitative to a qualitative assessment, reveals just how ugly the composition of "new jobs" has been. Consider this: the BLS reports that in February 2024, the US had 132.9 million full-time jobs and 27.9 million part-time jobs. Well, that's great... until you look back one year and find that in February 2023 the US had 133.2 million full-time jobs, or more than it does one year later! And yes, all the job growth since then has been in part-time jobs, which have increased by 921K since February 2023 (from 27.020 million to 27.941 million).

Here is a summary of the labor composition in the past year: all the new jobs have been part-time jobs!

But wait there's even more, because now that the primary season is over and we enter the heart of election season and political talking points will be thrown around left and right, especially in the context of the immigration crisis created intentionally by the Biden administration which is hoping to import millions of new Democratic voters (maybe the US can hold the presidential election in Honduras or Guatemala, after all it is their citizens that will be illegally casting the key votes in November), what we find is that in February, the number of native-born workers tumbled again, sliding by a massive 560K to just 129.807 million. Add to this the December data, and we get a near-record 2.4 million plunge in native-born workers in just the past 3 months (only the covid crash was worse)!

The offset? A record 1.2 million foreign-born (read immigrants, both legal and illegal but mostly illegal) workers added in February!

Said otherwise, not only has all job creation in the past 6 years has been exclusively for foreign-born workers...

Source: St Louis Fed FRED Native Born and Foreign Born

... but there has been zero job-creation for native born workers since June 2018!

This is a huge issue - especially at a time of an illegal alien flood at the southwest border...

... and is about to become a huge political scandal, because once the inevitable recession finally hits, there will be millions of furious unemployed Americans demanding a more accurate explanation for what happened - i.e., the illegal immigration floodgates that were opened by the Biden admin.

Which is also why Biden's handlers will do everything in their power to insure there is no official recession before November... and why after the election is over, all economic hell will finally break loose. Until then, however, expect the jobs numbers to get even more ridiculous.

Tyler Durden Fri, 03/08/2024 - 13:30

Read More

Continue Reading

Trending