Connect with us

Uncategorized

AI fast-tracks drug discovery to fight COVID-19

AI fast-tracks drug discovery to fight COVID-19

Published

on

Deep learning paired with drug docking and molecular dynamics simulations identify small molecules to shut down virus

IMAGE

Credit: Argonne National Laboratory

A global race is underway to discover a vaccine, drug, or combination of treatments that can disrupt the SARS-CoV-2 virus, which causes the COVID-19 disease, and prevent widespread deaths.

While researchers were able to rapidly identify a handful of known, Food and Drug Administration-approved drugs that may be promising, other major efforts are underway to screen every possible small molecule that might interact with the virus — and the proteins that control its behavior — to disrupt its activity.

The problem is, there are more than a billion such molecules. A researcher would conceivably want to test each one against the two dozen or so proteins in SARS-CoV-2 to see their effects. Such a project could use every wet lab in the world and still not be completed for centuries.

Computer modeling is a common approach used by academic researchers and pharmaceutical companies as a preliminary, filtering step in drug discovery. However, in this case, even every supercomputer on Earth could not test those billion molecules in a reasonable amount of time.

“Is it ever going to be possible to throw all of computing power available at the problem and get useful insights?” asks Arvind Ramanathan, a computational biologist in the Data Science and Learning Division at the U. S. Department of Energy’s (DOE) Argonne National Laboratory and a senior scientist at the University of Chicago Consortium for Advanced Science and Engineering (CASE).

In addition to working faster, computational scientists are having to work smarter.

A large collaborative effort led by researchers at Argonne combines artificial intelligence with physics-based drug docking and molecular dynamics simulations to rapidly hone in on the most promising molecules to test in the lab.

Doing so turns the challenge into a data, or machine-learning-oriented, problem, Ramanathan says. “We’re trying to build infrastructure to integrate AI and machine learning tools with physics-based tools. We bridge those two approaches to get a better bang for the buck.”

The project is using several of the most powerful supercomputers on the planet — the Frontera and Longhorn supercomputers at the Texas Advanced Computing Center; Summit at Oak Ridge National Laboratory; Theta at the Argonne Leadership Computing Facility (ALCF); and Comet at the San Diego Supercomputing Center — to run millions of simulations, train the machine learning system to identify the factors that might make a given molecule a good candidate, and then do further explorations on the most promising results.

“TACC has been critical for our work, especially the Frontera machine,” Ramanathan said. “We’ve been going at it for a while, using Frontera’s CPUs to the maximum capacity to rapidly screen: taking virtual molecules and putting them next to a protein to see if it binds, and then infer from it whether other molecules will also do the same.”

Doing so is no small task. In the first week, the team tested six million molecules. They are currently simulating 300,000 ligands per hour on Frontera.

“Having the ability to do a large amount of calculations is very good because it gives us hits that we can identify for further analysis.”

HONING IN ON A TARGET

The team began by exploring one of the smaller of the 24 proteins that COVID-19 produces, ADRP (adenosine diphosphate ribose 1″ phosphatase). Scientists do not entirely understand what function the protein performs, but it is implicated in viral replication.

Their deep-learning plus physics-based method is allowing them to reduce 1 billion possible molecules to 250 million; 250 million to 6 million; and 6 million to a few thousand. Of those, they selected the 30 or so with the highest “score” in terms of their ability to bind strongly to the protein, and disrupt the structure and dynamics of the protein — the ultimate goal.

They recently shared their results with experimental collaborators at the University of Chicago and the Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research to test in the lab and will soon publish their data in an open access report so thousands of teams can analyze the results and gain insights. Results of the lab experiments will further inform the deep learning models, helping fine-tune predictions for future protein-drug interactions.

The team has since moved on to the COVID-19 main protease, which plays an essential role in translating the viral RNA, and will soon begin work on larger proteins which are more challenging to compute, but may prove important. For instance, the team is preparing to simulate Rommie Amaro’s all-atom model of entire virus, which is currently being produced on Frontera.

The team’s work uses DeepDriveMD — Deep-Learning-Driven Adaptive Molecular Simulations for Protein Folding — a cutting-edge toolkit jointly developed by Ramanathan’s team at Argonne, along with Shantenu Jha’s team at Rutgers University/ Brookhaven National Laboratory (BNL) originally as part of the Exascale Computing Project.

Ramanathan and his collaborators are not the only researchers applying machine and deep learning to the COVID-19 drug discovery problem. But according to Arvind, their approach is rare in the degree to which AI and simulation are tightly-integrated and iterative, and not just used post-simulation.

“We built the toolkit to do the deep learning online, enabling it to sample as we go along,” Ramanathan said. “We first train it with some data, then allow it to infer on incoming simulation data very quickly. Then, based on the new snapshots it identifies, the approach automatically decides if the training needs to be revised.”

The system first establishes the binding stability of potential molecules in a fairly simple way, then adds more and more complex elements, like water, or performs finer analyses of the energy profile of the system. “Information is added at different funneling points and based on the results, it might need to revise the docking or machine learning algorithms.”

Its complex workflows are carefully orchestrated across multiple supercomputers using RADICAL-Cybertools, advanced workload execution and scheduling tools developed by computational experts at Rutgers/ BNL.

“The workflows have sophisticated requirements,” said Shantenu Jha, chair of BNL’s Center for Data-Driven Discovery and the lead of RADICAL. “Thanks to TACC’s technical support we were able to achieve both the desired levels of throughput and scale on Frontera and Longhorn within a couple of days and start production runs.”

APPLYING THE WEAPONS OF SCIENCE

The team had some advantages in getting their research off the ground.

The U. S. Department of Energy operates some of the most advanced x-ray crystallography labs in the world, and collaborates with many others. They were able to quickly extract the 3D structures of many of the COVID-19 proteins — the first step in doing computational modeling to explore how such proteins respond to drug-like molecules.

They also were actively working on a project with the National Cancer Institute to use the DeepDriveMD workflow to identify promising drugs to combat cancer. They quickly pivoted to COVID-19 with tools and methods that had already been tested and optimized.

Though AI is frequently considered a black box, Ramanathan says their methods do not just blindly generate a list of targets. DeepDriveMD deduces what common aspects of a protein make it a better candidate, and communicates those insights to researchers to help them understand what is actually happening in the virus with and without drug interactions.

“Our deep learning models can hone in on chemical groups that we think are critical for interactions,” he said. “We don’t know if it’s true, but we find docking scores are higher and believe it captures important concepts. This is not just important for what happens with this virus. We’re also trying to understand how viruses work generally.”

Once a drug-like small molecule is found to be effective in the lab, further testing (computational and experimental) is required to go from a promising target to a cure.

“Developing vaccines takes such a long time because molecules need to be optimized for function. They must be studied to determine that they’re not toxic and don’t do other harm, and also that they can be produced at scale,” Ramanathan said.

All of these further steps, the researchers believe, can be accelerated by the use of a hybrid AI- and physics-based modeling approach.

According to Rick Stevens, Argonne’s associate laboratory director for Computing, Environment and Life Sciences, TACC has been extremely supportive of their efforts.

“The rapid response and engagement we have received from TACC has made a critical difference in our ability to identify new therapeutic options for COVID-19,” Stevens said. “Access to TACC’s computing resources and expertise have enabled us to scale up the research collaboration applying advanced computing to one of today’s biggest challenges.”

The project compliments epidemiological and genetic research efforts supported by TACC, which is enabling more than 30 teams to undertake research that would not otherwise be achievable in the timeframe this crisis requires.

“In times of global need like this, it’s important not only that we bring all of our resources to bear, but that we do so in the most innovative ways possible,” said TACC Executive Director Dan Stanzione. “We’ve pivoted many of our resources towards crucial research in the fight against COVID-19, but supporting the new AI methodologies in this project gives us the chance to use those resources even more effectively.”

###

Media Contact
Aaron B Dubrow
aarondubrow@tacc.utexas.edu

Original Source

https://www.tacc.utexas.edu/-/ai-fast-tracks-drug-discovery-to-fight-covid-19

Read More

Continue Reading

Uncategorized

Fast-food chain closes restaurants after Chapter 11 bankruptcy

Several major fast-food chains recently have struggled to keep restaurants open.

Published

on

Competition in the fast-food space has been brutal as operators deal with inflation, consumers who are worried about the economy and their jobs and, in recent months, the falling cost of eating at home. 

Add in that many fast-food chains took on more debt during the covid pandemic and that labor costs are rising, and you have a perfect storm of problems. 

It's a situation where Restaurant Brands International (QSR) has suffered as much as any company.  

Related: Wendy's menu drops a fan favorite item, adds something new

Three major Burger King franchise operators filed for bankruptcy in 2023, and the chain saw hundreds of stores close. It also saw multiple Popeyes franchisees move into bankruptcy, with dozens of locations closing.

RBI also stepped in and purchased one of its key franchisees.

"Carrols is the largest Burger King franchisee in the United States today, operating 1,022 Burger King restaurants in 23 states that generated approximately $1.8 billion of system sales during the 12 months ended Sept. 30, 2023," RBI said in a news release. Carrols also owns and operates 60 Popeyes restaurants in six states." 

The multichain company made the move after two of its large franchisees, Premier Kings and Meridian, saw multiple locations not purchased when they reached auction after Chapter 11 bankruptcy filings. In that case, RBI bought select locations but allowed others to close.

Burger King lost hundreds of restaurants in 2023.

Image source: Chen Jianli/Xinhua via Getty

Another fast-food chain faces bankruptcy problems

Bojangles may not be as big a name as Burger King or Popeye's, but it's a popular chain with more than 800 restaurants in eight states.

"Bojangles is a Carolina-born restaurant chain specializing in craveable Southern chicken, biscuits and tea made fresh daily from real recipes, and with a friendly smile," the chain says on its website. "Founded in 1977 as a single location in Charlotte, our beloved brand continues to grow nationwide."

Like RBI, Bojangles uses a franchise model, which makes it dependent on the financial health of its operators. The company ultimately saw all its Maryland locations close due to the financial situation of one of its franchisees.

Unlike. RBI, Bojangles is not public — it was taken private by Durational Capital Management LP and Jordan Co. in 2018 — which means the company does not disclose its financial information to the public. 

That makes it hard to know whether overall softness for the brand contributed to the chain seeing its five Maryland locations after a Chapter 11 bankruptcy filing.

Bojangles has a messy bankruptcy situation

Even though the locations still appear on the Bojangles website, they have been shuttered since late 2023. The locations were operated by Salim Kakakhail and Yavir Akbar Durranni. The partners operated under a variety of LLCs, including ABS Network, according to local news channel WUSA9

The station reported that the owners face a state investigation over complaints of wage theft and fraudulent W2s. In November Durranni and ABS Network filed for bankruptcy in New Jersey, WUSA9 reported.

"Not only do former employees say these men owe them money, WUSA9 learned the former owners owe the state, too, and have over $69,000 in back property taxes."

Former employees also say that the restaurant would regularly purchase fried chicken from Popeyes and Safeway when it ran out in their stores, the station reported. 

Bojangles sent the station a comment on the situation.

"The franchisee is no longer in the Bojangles system," the company said. "However, it is important to note in your coverage that franchisees are independent business owners who are licensed to operate a brand but have autonomy over many aspects of their business, including hiring employees and payroll responsibilities."

Kakakhail and Durranni did not respond to multiple requests for comment from WUSA9.

Read More

Continue Reading

Uncategorized

Industrial Production Increased 0.1% in February

From the Fed: Industrial Production and Capacity Utilization
Industrial production edged up 0.1 percent in February after declining 0.5 percent in January. In February, the output of manufacturing rose 0.8 percent and the index for mining climbed 2.2 p…

Published

on

From the Fed: Industrial Production and Capacity Utilization
Industrial production edged up 0.1 percent in February after declining 0.5 percent in January. In February, the output of manufacturing rose 0.8 percent and the index for mining climbed 2.2 percent. Both gains partly reflected recoveries from weather-related declines in January. The index for utilities fell 7.5 percent in February because of warmer-than-typical temperatures. At 102.3 percent of its 2017 average, total industrial production in February was 0.2 percent below its year-earlier level. Capacity utilization for the industrial sector remained at 78.3 percent in February, a rate that is 1.3 percentage points below its long-run (1972–2023) average.
emphasis added
Click on graph for larger image.

This graph shows Capacity Utilization. This series is up from the record low set in April 2020, and above the level in February 2020 (pre-pandemic).

Capacity utilization at 78.3% is 1.3% below the average from 1972 to 2022.  This was below consensus expectations.

Note: y-axis doesn't start at zero to better show the change.


Industrial Production The second graph shows industrial production since 1967.

Industrial production increased to 102.3. This is above the pre-pandemic level.

Industrial production was above consensus expectations.

Read More

Continue Reading

Uncategorized

Southwest and United Airlines have bad news for passengers

Both airlines are facing the same problem, one that could lead to higher airfares and fewer flight options.

Published

on

Airlines operate in a market that's dictated by supply and demand: If more people want to fly a specific route than there are available seats, then tickets on those flights cost more.

That makes scheduling and predicting demand a huge part of maximizing revenue for airlines. There are, however, numerous factors that go into how airlines decide which flights to put on the schedule.

Related: Major airline faces Chapter 11 bankruptcy concerns

Every airport has only a certain number of gates, flight slots and runway capacity, limiting carriers' flexibility. That's why during times of high demand — like flights to Las Vegas during Super Bowl week — do not usually translate to airlines sending more planes to and from that destination.

Airlines generally do try to add capacity every year. That's become challenging as Boeing has struggled to keep up with demand for new airplanes. If you can't add airplanes, you can't grow your business. That's caused problems for the entire industry. 

Every airline retires planes each year. In general, those get replaced by newer, better models that offer more efficiency and, in most cases, better passenger amenities. 

If an airline can't get the planes it had hoped to add to its fleet in a given year, it can face capacity problems. And it's a problem that both Southwest Airlines (LUV) and United Airlines have addressed in a way that's inevitable but bad for passengers. 

Southwest Airlines has not been able to get the airplanes it had hoped to.

Image source: Kevin Dietsch/Getty Images

Southwest slows down its pilot hiring

In 2023, Southwest made a huge push to hire pilots. The airline lost thousands of pilots to retirement during the covid pandemic and it needed to replace them in order to build back to its 2019 capacity.

The airline successfully did that but will not continue that trend in 2024.

"Southwest plans to hire approximately 350 pilots this year, and no new-hire classes are scheduled after this month," Travel Weekly reported. "Last year, Southwest hired 1,916 pilots, according to pilot recruitment advisory firm Future & Active Pilot Advisors. The airline hired 1,140 pilots in 2022." 

The slowdown in hiring directly relates to the airline expecting to grow capacity only in the low-single-digits percent in 2024.

"Moving into 2024, there is continued uncertainty around the timing of expected Boeing deliveries and the certification of the Max 7 aircraft. Our fleet plans remain nimble and currently differs from our contractual order book with Boeing," Southwest Airlines Chief Financial Officer Tammy Romo said during the airline's fourth-quarter-earnings call

"We are planning for 79 aircraft deliveries this year and expect to retire roughly 45 700 and 4 800, resulting in a net expected increase of 30 aircraft this year."

That's very modest growth, which should not be enough of an increase in capacity to lower prices in any significant way.

United Airlines pauses pilot hiring

Boeing's  (BA)  struggles have had wide impact across the industry. United Airlines has also said it was going to pause hiring new pilots through the end of May.

United  (UAL)  Fight Operations Vice President Marc Champion explained the situation in a memo to the airline's staff.

"As you know, United has hundreds of new planes on order, and while we remain on path to be the fastest-growing airline in the industry, we just won't grow as fast as we thought we would in 2024 due to continued delays at Boeing," he said.

"For example, we had contractual deliveries for 80 Max 10s this year alone, but those aircraft aren't even certified yet, and it's impossible to know when they will arrive." 

That's another blow to consumers hoping that multiple major carriers would grow capacity, putting pressure on fares. Until Boeing can get back on track, it's unlikely that competition between the large airlines will lead to lower fares.  

In fact, it's possible that consumer demand will grow more than airline capacity which could push prices higher.

Related: Veteran fund manager picks favorite stocks for 2024

Read More

Continue Reading

Trending