Connect with us

What is Stock Market Seasonality?

Seasonality is when things change in data in a repeatable and predictable manner. Like summer heat and winter cold, data too, has “seasons” which repeat…

Published

on

Seasonality is when things change in data in a repeatable and predictable manner.

Like summer heat and winter cold, data too, has “seasons” which repeat itself predictably. 

There’s seasonality in most datasets, especially in the financial and economic fields. Look at any economic statistic published by the government and you’ll often see the headline figure is “seasonally adjusted,” to remove the seasonal bias. 

Before we move on with technical-speak, lets ensure that we understand seasonality in practical, common sense terms. 

Some things are extremely seasonal and predictable.

Gasoline consumption is seasonal. People tend to travel and go out more in the summer so they buy more gasoline. Save for fluke events like a global pandemic, you can bet on this happening every year.

The above graph is an average demand/price for gasoline in the US on a monthly basis over 20 years of data. As you can see, there’s a predictable rise in the summer over the 20 year period, which repeats itself almost every year.

That is seasonality–a predictable and repeatable trend in data. 

The same is true of retail sales. The holiday season is the biggest time of year for the retail industry and often this one quarter accounts for more than half of a store’s sales. This too, is highly predictable. 

Notice the predictable spikes in retail sales during the holiday season every year from 2015 to 2019. This seasonal trend occurs in recessions and healthy economies. 

In essence, seasonality is simply extracting human behavior patterns from data.

For that reason, it stands to reason that if the seasonal consumption trends of gasoline, home sales, and retail sales are all highly predictable, then perhaps people’s buying and selling of stocks has some predictability. 

And that’s true. There are real socioeconomic factors that affect people’s buying and selling of stocks which occur at regular and predictable intervals which we’ll get into in this article.

But that statement needs a million asterisks and you’ll soon see why. 

The Problem of Seasonality in the Stock Market

While, for instance, gasoline consumption is predictable, that doesn’t mean the future price of gasoline is predictable. So many factors outside of seasonality affect the price of gas that simply betting on seasonality might be profitable, it’ll be very noisy.

Furthermore, the true problem of betting on seasonality in any exchange-traded market comes with the very fact that we’re talking about.

When traders know about predictable seasonal patterns, they make trades based on them.

Let’s do a thought experiment.

Let’s say that gasoline was $1/gallon all year, except that during the summer season, the price goes up $2/gallon. This happens every single year in the same predictable pattern.

Smart traders would begin to take advantage of this by buying the day before summer starts. Their anticipatory buying would slightly push up the price the day before summer starts. So smarter traders would start buying two days before to front-run the price rising.

This would be an iterative process until there was no ability to front-run the summer effect and the price reflected this phenomenon all-year-round, adjusted for the time value of money obviously.

This is what people mean when they say “priced-in.” 

It’s vital to keep in mind that any easily observable seasonality in markets will be to some degree, priced in. This doesn’t mean that you can’t profit from it, you just have to assess how priced in the effect is, and if the risk/reward stands up. 

That all makes sense too. Any time there is a reasonably obvious way to beat the stock market (make better risk-adjusted returns than the broad market), many folks will jump on it until the edge is priced-in.

The stock market is a giant game of chess played by the smartest, richest people in the world, they take advantage of every easy edge there is. 

The Summer Effect: “Sell in May and Go Away”

One of the oldest seasonal tendencies of the stock market is the tendency for weak seasonality in the summer.

Apparently one of the first observations of this effect was a result of traders realizing that London stockbrokers would take extended holidays in the summer, leading to reduced volumes. 

Nowadays the same is true of Wall Street traders and portfolio managers spending more time and mental energy on their summer adventures in the Hamptons and New England. 

So how does the “sell in May” strategy stand up to scrutiny? The easiest way to measure this would be to look at average monthly returns in the S&P 500 for each month of the year: 

As you can see there’s a very observable seasonal effect of summer weakness in the stock market. 

A very simple way to implement this strategy would be to hold stocks from October to April, and sell them in May. This approach has some problems as spending roughly half of the year out of the market could mean that you miss the strongest rallies.

After all, summer weakness is not a rule, it’s simply a statistical tendency. Any given summer in the stock market could be extremely strong, like summer 2020 in tech stocks for example: 

Furthermore, the S&P 500 has, on average, positive returns even during the summer (just weaker than the rest of the year), so you’re missing out on gains by being out of the market. 

The Santa Claus Rally

The Santa Claus Rally is like an annual Christmas gift to the stock market. It refers to the seasonal outperformance of the stock market during the holiday season.

There’s no settled timeframe to define the Santa Claus Rally.

Some start the holiday season the week before Thanksgiving and end the day after New Year’s Day, while others use a much smaller timeframe of the trading days following Christmas Day, ending the day after New Year’s Day. 

There’s no clear-cut reason to explain this seasonal effect, although some theories pertain to end-of-year tax-related trading, or increased investing activity due to holiday bonuses/gifts. Our job isn’t to find why, but to exploit these tendencies for profit. 

This effect is quite similar to “sell in May and go away,” except it focuses solely on the winter months which are the primary source of outperformance.

Here’s a chart  showing S&P 500 seasonal strength during the holiday season from 2000 to 2020: 

The Market Holiday Effect

There’s a strange stock market tendency that leads to outperformance in the days leading to and following market holidays. These don’t have to be major holidays, either, this effect holds true for any day the market is closed, like Memorial Day or President’s Day. 

Note that a ‘market holiday’ in this context means the stock market is closed for that day. 

The trade involves buying the S&P 500 or Dow Jones Industrial Average three trading days prior to a given holiday and holding it three trading days following the holiday. 

Tax Loss Harvesting/Selling Seasonality

One of the more explainable seasonal tendencies in the stock market relates directly to human behavior.

There are real incentives in place to drive this predictable and repeatable piece of human behavior, making this strategy more robust than most in the eyes of many seasonality traders. 

It’s called tax loss harvesting. It’s the tendency for investors to sell their losing investments before the end of the calendar year to realize capital deductible capital losses, while simultaneously replacing them with similar investments. 

For example, let’s say you were betting on oil stocks and owned shares of ExxonMobil (XOM). At the end of the year, you had a $10,000 loss on your Exxon shares.

You’d love to write-off those losses against your taxable income but you’re still bullish on oil stocks. Some investors in this situation might sell Exxon to realize and thus “harvest” the deductible losses, and then replace your Exxon shares with a very similar asset, like say, Chevron (CVX). 

Note that investors cannot simply realize the $10,000 Exxon loss and then just re-buy Exxon shares, that would be considered a “wash sale” and your losses wouldn’t be eligible for deduction. This is why investors will often replace their shares of, say, Exxon, with something similar but not identical like Chevron. 

So essentially the seasonal tendency here is that weak stocks tend to get weaker in the last few weeks of the trading year, and bounce back when the new calendar year starts as investors buy back their old positions. 

Now that you understand why this structural incentive to sell weak stocks at the end of the year exists, let’s look at some simple ways to exploit it. 

One such strategy is to focus on really beaten down small caps, as these tend to represent some people’s biggest portfolio losers. An additional headwind to put in your favor is to focus on stocks with less institutional ownership, as retail investors and traders tend to tax-loss sell more indiscriminately. 

So the basic concept here is to find small-cap stocks with low institutional ownership that were really beaten down on the year. 

Bottom Line

While seasonal trading is mainstream and a well-accepted form of alpha in the commodities world, it’s still a red-headed step child in the stock market world.

The seasonality of commodities is obvious to everyone; grains have their harvest season, gasoline consumption has well-established consumption trends, and so on. It’s not so clear in the stock market. 

But it’s quite clear that seasonality does exist in the stock market, it’s just harder to find and even harder to explain.

The catch here is that when a trading advantage is more esoteric and less widely accepted, it also tends to be more profitable.

The post What is Stock Market Seasonality? appeared first on Warrior Trading.

Read More

Continue Reading

Uncategorized

Homes listed for sale in early June sell for $7,700 more

New Zillow research suggests the spring home shopping season may see a second wave this summer if mortgage rates fall
The post Homes listed for sale in…

Published

on

  • A Zillow analysis of 2023 home sales finds homes listed in the first two weeks of June sold for 2.3% more. 
  • The best time to list a home for sale is a month later than it was in 2019, likely driven by mortgage rates.
  • The best time to list can be as early as the second half of February in San Francisco, and as late as the first half of July in New York and Philadelphia. 

Spring home sellers looking to maximize their sale price may want to wait it out and list their home for sale in the first half of June. A new Zillow® analysis of 2023 sales found that homes listed in the first two weeks of June sold for 2.3% more, a $7,700 boost on a typical U.S. home.  

The best time to list consistently had been early May in the years leading up to the pandemic. The shift to June suggests mortgage rates are strongly influencing demand on top of the usual seasonality that brings buyers to the market in the spring. This home-shopping season is poised to follow a similar pattern as that in 2023, with the potential for a second wave if the Federal Reserve lowers interest rates midyear or later. 

The 2.3% sale price premium registered last June followed the first spring in more than 15 years with mortgage rates over 6% on a 30-year fixed-rate loan. The high rates put home buyers on the back foot, and as rates continued upward through May, they were still reassessing and less likely to bid boldly. In June, however, rates pulled back a little from 6.79% to 6.67%, which likely presented an opportunity for determined buyers heading into summer. More buyers understood their market position and could afford to transact, boosting competition and sale prices.

The old logic was that sellers could earn a premium by listing in late spring, when search activity hit its peak. Now, with persistently low inventory, mortgage rate fluctuations make their own seasonality. First-time home buyers who are on the edge of qualifying for a home loan may dip in and out of the market, depending on what’s happening with rates. It is almost certain the Federal Reserve will push back any interest-rate cuts to mid-2024 at the earliest. If mortgage rates follow, that could bring another surge of buyers later this year.

Mortgage rates have been impacting affordability and sale prices since they began rising rapidly two years ago. In 2022, sellers nationwide saw the highest sale premium when they listed their home in late March, right before rates barreled past 5% and continued climbing. 

Zillow’s research finds the best time to list can vary widely by metropolitan area. In 2023, it was as early as the second half of February in San Francisco, and as late as the first half of July in New York. Thirty of the top 35 largest metro areas saw for-sale listings command the highest sale prices between May and early July last year. 

Zillow also found a wide range in the sale price premiums associated with homes listed during those peak periods. At the hottest time of the year in San Jose, homes sold for 5.5% more, a $88,000 boost on a typical home. Meanwhile, homes in San Antonio sold for 1.9% more during that same time period.  

 

Metropolitan Area Best Time to List Price Premium Dollar Boost
United States First half of June 2.3% $7,700
New York, NY First half of July 2.4% $15,500
Los Angeles, CA First half of May 4.1% $39,300
Chicago, IL First half of June 2.8% $8,800
Dallas, TX First half of June 2.5% $9,200
Houston, TX Second half of April 2.0% $6,200
Washington, DC Second half of June 2.2% $12,700
Philadelphia, PA First half of July 2.4% $8,200
Miami, FL First half of June 2.3% $12,900
Atlanta, GA Second half of June 2.3% $8,700
Boston, MA Second half of May 3.5% $23,600
Phoenix, AZ First half of June 3.2% $14,700
San Francisco, CA Second half of February 4.2% $50,300
Riverside, CA First half of May 2.7% $15,600
Detroit, MI First half of July 3.3% $7,900
Seattle, WA First half of June 4.3% $31,500
Minneapolis, MN Second half of May 3.7% $13,400
San Diego, CA Second half of April 3.1% $29,600
Tampa, FL Second half of June 2.1% $8,000
Denver, CO Second half of May 2.9% $16,900
Baltimore, MD First half of July 2.2% $8,200
St. Louis, MO First half of June 2.9% $7,000
Orlando, FL First half of June 2.2% $8,700
Charlotte, NC Second half of May 3.0% $11,000
San Antonio, TX First half of June 1.9% $5,400
Portland, OR Second half of April 2.6% $14,300
Sacramento, CA First half of June 3.2% $17,900
Pittsburgh, PA Second half of June 2.3% $4,700
Cincinnati, OH Second half of April 2.7% $7,500
Austin, TX Second half of May 2.8% $12,600
Las Vegas, NV First half of June 3.4% $14,600
Kansas City, MO Second half of May 2.5% $7,300
Columbus, OH Second half of June 3.3% $10,400
Indianapolis, IN First half of July 3.0% $8,100
Cleveland, OH First half of July  3.4% $7,400
San Jose, CA First half of June 5.5% $88,400

 

The post Homes listed for sale in early June sell for $7,700 more appeared first on Zillow Research.

Read More

Continue Reading

Government

Survey Shows Declining Concerns Among Americans About COVID-19

Survey Shows Declining Concerns Among Americans About COVID-19

A new survey reveals that only 20% of Americans view covid-19 as "a major threat"…

Published

on

Survey Shows Declining Concerns Among Americans About COVID-19

A new survey reveals that only 20% of Americans view covid-19 as "a major threat" to the health of the US population - a sharp decline from a high of 67% in July 2020.

(SARMDY/Shutterstock)

What's more, the Pew Research Center survey conducted from Feb. 7 to Feb. 11 showed that just 10% of Americans are concerned that they will  catch the disease and require hospitalization.

"This data represents a low ebb of public concern about the virus that reached its height in the summer and fall of 2020, when as many as two-thirds of Americans viewed COVID-19 as a major threat to public health," reads the report, which was published March 7.

According to the survey, half of the participants understand the significance of researchers and healthcare providers in understanding and treating long COVID - however 27% of participants consider this issue less important, while 22% of Americans are unaware of long COVID.

What's more, while Democrats were far more worried than Republicans in the past, that gap has narrowed significantly.

"In the pandemic’s first year, Democrats were routinely about 40 points more likely than Republicans to view the coronavirus as a major threat to the health of the U.S. population. This gap has waned as overall levels of concern have fallen," reads the report.

More via the Epoch Times;

The survey found that three in ten Democrats under 50 have received an updated COVID-19 vaccine, compared with 66 percent of Democrats ages 65 and older.

Moreover, 66 percent of Democrats ages 65 and older have received the updated COVID-19 vaccine, while only 24 percent of Republicans ages 65 and older have done so.

“This 42-point partisan gap is much wider now than at other points since the start of the outbreak. For instance, in August 2021, 93 percent of older Democrats and 78 percent of older Republicans said they had received all the shots needed to be fully vaccinated (a 15-point gap),” it noted.

COVID-19 No Longer an Emergency

The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) recently issued its updated recommendations for the virus, which no longer require people to stay home for five days after testing positive for COVID-19.

The updated guidance recommends that people who contracted a respiratory virus stay home, and they can resume normal activities when their symptoms improve overall and their fever subsides for 24 hours without medication.

“We still must use the commonsense solutions we know work to protect ourselves and others from serious illness from respiratory viruses, this includes vaccination, treatment, and staying home when we get sick,” CDC director Dr. Mandy Cohen said in a statement.

The CDC said that while the virus remains a threat, it is now less likely to cause severe illness because of widespread immunity and improved tools to prevent and treat the disease.

Importantly, states and countries that have already adjusted recommended isolation times have not seen increased hospitalizations or deaths related to COVID-19,” it stated.

The federal government suspended its free at-home COVID-19 test program on March 8, according to a website set up by the government, following a decrease in COVID-19-related hospitalizations.

According to the CDC, hospitalization rates for COVID-19 and influenza diseases remain “elevated” but are decreasing in some parts of the United States.

Tyler Durden Sun, 03/10/2024 - 22:45

Read More

Continue Reading

Government

Rand Paul Teases Senate GOP Leader Run – Musk Says “I Would Support”

Rand Paul Teases Senate GOP Leader Run – Musk Says "I Would Support"

Republican Kentucky Senator Rand Paul on Friday hinted that he may jump…

Published

on

Rand Paul Teases Senate GOP Leader Run - Musk Says "I Would Support"

Republican Kentucky Senator Rand Paul on Friday hinted that he may jump into the race to become the next Senate GOP leader, and Elon Musk was quick to support the idea. Republicans must find a successor for periodically malfunctioning Mitch McConnell, who recently announced he'll step down in November, though intending to keep his Senate seat until his term ends in January 2027, when he'd be within weeks of turning 86. 

So far, the announced field consists of two quintessential establishment types: John Cornyn of Texas and John Thune of South Dakota. While John Barrasso's name had been thrown around as one of "The Three Johns" considered top contenders, the Wyoming senator on Tuesday said he'll instead seek the number two slot as party whip. 

Paul used X to tease his potential bid for the position which -- if the GOP takes back the upper chamber in November -- could graduate from Minority Leader to Majority Leader. He started by telling his 5.1 million followers he'd had lots of people asking him about his interest in running...

...then followed up with a poll in which he predictably annihilated Cornyn and Thune, taking a 96% share as of Friday night, with the other two below 2% each. 

Elon Musk was quick to back the idea of Paul as GOP leader, while daring Cornyn and Thune to follow Paul's lead by throwing their names out for consideration by the Twitter-verse X-verse. 

Paul has been a stalwart opponent of security-state mass surveillance, foreign interventionism -- to include shoveling billions of dollars into the proxy war in Ukraine -- and out-of-control spending in general. He demonstrated the latter passion on the Senate floor this week as he ridiculed the latest kick-the-can spending package:   

In February, Paul used Senate rules to force his colleagues into a grueling Super Bowl weekend of votes, as he worked to derail a $95 billion foreign aid bill. "I think we should stay here as long as it takes,” said Paul. “If it takes a week or a month, I’ll force them to stay here to discuss why they think the border of Ukraine is more important than the US border.”

Don't expect a Majority Leader Paul to ditch the filibuster -- he's been a hardy user of the legislative delay tactic. In 2013, he spoke for 13 hours to fight the nomination of John Brennan as CIA director. In 2015, he orated for 10-and-a-half-hours to oppose extension of the Patriot Act

Rand Paul amid his 10 1/2 hour filibuster in 2015

Among the general public, Paul is probably best known as Capitol Hill's chief tormentor of Dr. Anthony Fauci, who was director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Disease during the Covid-19 pandemic. Paul says the evidence indicates the virus emerged from China's Wuhan Institute of Virology. He's accused Fauci and other members of the US government public health apparatus of evading questions about their funding of the Chinese lab's "gain of function" research, which takes natural viruses and morphs them into something more dangerous. Paul has pointedly said that Fauci committed perjury in congressional hearings and that he belongs in jail "without question."   

Musk is neither the only nor the first noteworthy figure to back Paul for party leader. Just hours after McConnell announced his upcoming step-down from leadership, independent 2024 presidential candidate Robert F. Kennedy, Jr voiced his support: 

In a testament to the extent to which the establishment recoils at the libertarian-minded Paul, mainstream media outlets -- which have been quick to report on other developments in the majority leader race -- pretended not to notice that Paul had signaled his interest in the job. More than 24 hours after Paul's test-the-waters tweet-fest began, not a single major outlet had brought it to the attention of their audience. 

That may be his strongest endorsement yet. 

Tyler Durden Sun, 03/10/2024 - 20:25

Read More

Continue Reading

Trending