Connect with us

Government

Tracing Global Meat Related Risks With Blockchain Amid COVID-19

Tracing Global Meat Related Risks With Blockchain Amid COVID-19

Published

on

To gain transparency and consumer safety, the food-processing and meatpacking plants are implementing blockchain technology to their operation services.

COVID-19 continues to wreak havoc, with United States meat producers being the latest victims of the pandemic in a “cascading series of events,” including shutting down of the food service sector, universities and school lunch programs, all likely to impact millions of Americans.

Meat processing plants around the U.S., which emerged as the world’s epicenter of the pandemic, have seen huge outbreaks of COVID-19, as the virus has spread quickly among workers crammed in close quarters, often without recommended protective gear. “After the outbreak was announced in the U.S., we never stopped working,” a meatpacking employee said. He continued:

“I had to keep working without any protective [equipment] in place because I have no other means of income. But we were always afraid we might be too exposed to the virus.”

The outbreak has interrupted work at meat processing plants, with workers, truckers and meat inspectors expressing fears of traveling to hotspots. One hundred workers of the Food Safety and Inspection Service — part of the U.S. Department of Agriculture — may need to find their own protective gear and have “tested positive for the coronavirus as the illness ravages the nation’s meat processing plants.”

Prior to the COVID-19 pandemic’s quick spread to nearly every country around the world, blockchain technology had already begun its entrance into the livestock and meat-packing industry for increased risk tracking. The worldwide production and trade of livestock is a major economic, social and political force. Supporting around 1.3 billion people, the sector has an estimated value of $1.4 trillion, equal to 40% of agricultural gross domestic product worldwide. Along the complex multinational global livestock/meat chain supply, there are various risks to keep track of, such as possible sanitary restrictions, trade barriers, sanctions, corruption and now, COVID-19-related risks.

Blockchain adoption by U.S. federal food and disease regulators

In the U.S., the federal meat and disease regulators are the Department of Agriculture and the Centers for Disease Control, respectively. Both have been turning to blockchain technology to track food safety as well as disease, which has become a more urgent task with the spread of COVID-19 worldwide.

The U.S. Department of Agriculture: The USDA is a federal agency responsible for overseeing meat, poultry and egg product safety. Meat, for example, goes through three separate USDA inspections: at the slaughterhouse, at the meat-processing facility and at the meat factory.

While digitization was identified in the USDA’s report to the President in 2018, the emergence of COVID-19 in November expedited implementation of blockchain technology for tracing food safety throughout the supply chain.

At the beginning of this year, the USDA announced that IBM was developing a blockchain proof-of-concept for the Food Safety and Inspection Service, or FSIS — the United States’ food safety arm — as part of its 2020 Annual Plan to evaluate how blockchain can be optimized to track goods throughout supply chains for export certification systems. So far, the USDA has allocated $250,000 to develop this software.

Center for Disease Control: The CDC timeline for implementing the needed technological tools to trace the spread of COVID-19 has become a “here and now” priority. The CDC and different organizations including Bloomberg School of Public Health at Johns Hopkins University, the Villanova University Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering and the coalition network, among others, are currently developing contact tracing platforms to contain COVID-19 by utilizing blockchain, artificial intelligence and IoT technology to help track coronavirus cases globally.

Blockchain adoption to track meat supply chain in Australia

The first testing of blockchain technology for supply chain management in the meatpacking industry was announced last November as the COVID-19 pandemic surfaced in Wuhan, China, by JBS S.A., one of the world’s largest animal protein companies.

The company’s Australian subsidiary is the nation’s largest food processing company, marketer and exporter. It began developing a tracer that provides data “from paddock to plate” with Sydney-based startup Lumachain. The project uses Microsoft technology including Azure AI, IoT and blockchain, and is in collaboration with Australia’s national science agency, CSIRO. 

According to JBS Australia CEO Brent Eastwood:

“The end-to-end transparency that this trial is demonstrating has enormous potential for not only Australia’s meat producers — but the entire food chain. For consumers Lumachain’s solution provides the rich information that they want, giving them peace of mind about what they are feeding their family for dinner.” 

JBS’s blockchain-based food supply tracking initiative followed a $1.5 billion meat sales deal closed in November between JBS Australia and Win Chain — a supply chain e-commerce platform and subsidiary of Chinese tech behemoth Alibaba that links upstream and downstream fresh food resources, providing integration between supplier, processing, warehousing, distribution, supply chain finance and brand marketing to help international suppliers sell their products in China.

Operation Carne Fraca and other violations in the meat industry

Despite the meat conglomerate showing signs of a progressive stance on technology across the Pacific, JBS S.A. has demonstrated time and again its propensity for misconduct, one instance of which — the alleged sale of chemically treated rotten meat — resulted in a federal investigation by Brazilian authorities, named Operation Carne Fraca. The company’s path is additionally paved with legal breaches, scandals, high-level corruption schemes, unfavorable labor conditions and environmental breaches involving the use of deforested Amazon rainforest fragments for cattle grazing. Brazil’s JBS S.A. operates in over 150 countries with an annual revenue of about $50 billion, 53% of which comes from its U.S. operations. The company has yet to test or implement blockchain technology to track the safety of its food supply chain within its parent company or subsidiaries other than JBS Australia.

JBS S.A. has been able to get away with multiple corporate governance lapses for a long time, mainly because JBS S.A. founder Joesley Batista confessed to, and served prison time for, bribing 2,000 officials in the Brazilian government (including ex-President Michel Temer) with a total of $250 million. This systemic corruption allowed the company to not only sell and export salmonella-contaminated meat, but also secure government funding from Brazil’s development bank to finance its international expansion, including the purchase of its U.S. beef-producing units of Smithfield Foods Inc. in 2008 and U.S. poultry producer Pilgrim’s Pride Corporation in 2009, among other companies. For these corporate governance violations, JBS executives were slapped with more than $3.2 billion in fines in 2017, one of the largest fines in history. 

That same year, under the OECD’s Tax Transparency Rules, multinational companies were required to adhere to a new country-by-country reporting standard. Since 2017, the standard mandated that all multinational companies disclose cryptocurrency and property bribery payments for each tax jurisdiction in which they conduct business. Accordingly, the U.S. Justice Department and the Securities and Exchange Commission had been investigating JBS S.A.’s parent company, J&F Investimentos, for “potential violations of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act” for bribery payments made to foreign government officials before three U.S. Senators, and one U.S. house representative urged other U.S. government agencies, mainly the USDA and the Treasury Department to investigate JBS S.A. amid the widening COVID-19 outbreaks, which has resulted in JBS plant closures in several states, including Minnesota, South Dakota, Pennsylvania and Colorado. To add to this, JBS received up to $100 million of U.S. taxpayer funds intended for struggling American farmers, and instead spent it on financing JBS S.A.’s expansion spree mainly to supply the growing meat demand from China.

Sen. Richard Blumenthal urged the Secretary of Agriculture, Sonny Perdue: “Immediately cease any existing or future bailout payments to foreign-owned corporations, like the Brazilian-owned meatpacker JBS, and remove them from your approved and eligible vendors list.” U.S. House representative Rosa De Lauro has also urged the USDA Inspector General to investigate payments made to JBS.

U.S. Senators Marco Rubio and Robert Menendez asked Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin for the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States to review transactions by JBS S.A., which purchased several U.S. meat companies in recent years with “ill-gotten financing” and to assess its implications on the national security and safety of the nation’s food supply. The letter listed the meat conglomerate’s ties to the sanctioned Venezuelan Maduro regime as an additional reason for the request, perhaps due to its use of cryptocurrencies in barter trades for food sales.

Related: Petro Couldn’t Save the Cartel of the Suns Conspiracy From the Sting of Sanctions

Last December, Brazilian prosecutors filed a case against JBS S.A., its holding company and 14 people for alleged fraud in loans from Brazil’s National Bank for Economic and Social Development, or BNDES, which allowed the company to internationally expand and become one of the world’s largest beef producers. Prosecutors are seeking compensation of 21 billion reais ($5 billion) and are seeking conviction of the company’s founders, Joesley and Wesley Batista, for their wrongdoing and resulting illegal enrichment related to transactions made between the corporation and BNDES. 

Following JBS’s corruption investigation and lawsuit, BNDES — JBS’s biggest shareholder after the Batista family — announced the sale of part of its 21.3% stake in the company as part of a plan to exit investments in private companies to replenish government coffers. The meat giant’s profitability soared by 40% in 2019 compared to the year before.

Blockchain for tracking corruption in government funds and grants

The Brazilian bank’s changed focus toward the prosperity of its nation does not end at selling its stake in JBS. Since late 2018, BNDES has also been in the process of developing a stablecoin, BNDES Token, for higher transparency in public spending. Similarly, the U.S. Treasury Department began testing a blockchain-based grants payment system early this year that tokenizes electronic federal letters of credit sent out to grant recipients, ensuring their traceability and transparency. For cases such as JBS S.A.’s, the traceability of government grant money would expose the meat conglomerate’s expenditure of these funds on bribery and foreign expansion. When funding provided by the U.S. government is used outside of the country to finance illegal activity (a cross-border bribe, for example), that legal violation can then be pursued in the U.S. justice system, even if the bribe occurred outside of the country.

Conclusion

As for bringing food supply chains further into the next era of tech, acting FDA Commissioner Ned Sharpless explained:

“We expect to see more innovation in the agriculture, food production, and food distribution systems in the next 10 years than we’ve seen in the past 20, which will continue to provide an even greater variety of food options and delivery conveniences to American consumers. With this ever-changing landscape, we know we must continue preparing to take advantage of new opportunities and address potential risks.”

The widening COVID-19 outbreaks in at least 79 U.S. food-processing and meatpacking plants, while most unfortunate, is spurring expedited blockchain technology adoption in the meatpacking industry to bring the world closer to a point where consumer safety is a priority and corporate corruption is a reprehensible and unfavorable means of doing business for all parties concerned. To avert a food shortage, U.S. President Donald Trump signed an executive order under the Defense Production Act on April 28 to compel meat processing plants to remain open, with the government providing additional protective gear for employees as well as regulatory guidance.

The views, thoughts and opinions expressed here are the author’s alone and do not necessarily reflect or represent the views and opinions of Cointelegraph.

Selva Ozelli, Esq., CPA, is an international tax attorney and certified public accountant who frequently writes about tax, legal and accounting issues for Tax Notes, Bloomberg BNA, other publications and the OECD.

Read More

Continue Reading

International

Beloved mall retailer files Chapter 7 bankruptcy, will liquidate

The struggling chain has given up the fight and will close hundreds of stores around the world.

Published

on

It has been a brutal period for several popular retailers. The fallout from the covid pandemic and a challenging economic environment have pushed numerous chains into bankruptcy with Tuesday Morning, Christmas Tree Shops, and Bed Bath & Beyond all moving from Chapter 11 to Chapter 7 bankruptcy liquidation.

In all three of those cases, the companies faced clear financial pressures that led to inventory problems and vendors demanding faster, or even upfront payment. That creates a sort of inevitability.

Related: Beloved retailer finds life after bankruptcy, new famous owner

When a retailer faces financial pressure it sets off a cycle where vendors become wary of selling them items. That leads to barren shelves and no ability for the chain to sell its way out of its financial problems. 

Once that happens bankruptcy generally becomes the only option. Sometimes that means a Chapter 11 filing which gives the company a chance to negotiate with its creditors. In some cases, deals can be worked out where vendors extend longer terms or even forgive some debts, and banks offer an extension of loan terms.

In other cases, new funding can be secured which assuages vendor concerns or the company might be taken over by its vendors. Sometimes, as was the case with David's Bridal, a new owner steps in, adds new money, and makes deals with creditors in order to give the company a new lease on life.

It's rare that a retailer moves directly into Chapter 7 bankruptcy and decides to liquidate without trying to find a new source of funding.

Mall traffic has varied depending upon the type of mall.

Image source: Getty Images

The Body Shop has bad news for customers  

The Body Shop has been in a very public fight for survival. Fears began when the company closed half of its locations in the United Kingdom. That was followed by a bankruptcy-style filing in Canada and an abrupt closure of its U.S. stores on March 4.

"The Canadian subsidiary of the global beauty and cosmetics brand announced it has started restructuring proceedings by filing a Notice of Intention (NOI) to Make a Proposal pursuant to the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act (Canada). In the same release, the company said that, as of March 1, 2024, The Body Shop US Limited has ceased operations," Chain Store Age reported.

A message on the company's U.S. website shared a simple message that does not appear to be the entire story.

"We're currently undergoing planned maintenance, but don't worry we're due to be back online soon."

That same message is still on the company's website, but a new filing makes it clear that the site is not down for maintenance, it's down for good.

The Body Shop files for Chapter 7 bankruptcy

While the future appeared bleak for The Body Shop, fans of the brand held out hope that a savior would step in. That's not going to be the case. 

The Body Shop filed for Chapter 7 bankruptcy in the United States.

"The US arm of the ethical cosmetics group has ceased trading at its 50 outlets. On Saturday (March 9), it filed for Chapter 7 insolvency, under which assets are sold off to clear debts, putting about 400 jobs at risk including those in a distribution center that still holds millions of dollars worth of stock," The Guardian reported.

After its closure in the United States, the survival of the brand remains very much in doubt. About half of the chain's stores in the United Kingdom remain open along with its Australian stores. 

The future of those stores remains very much in doubt and the chain has shared that it needs new funding in order for them to continue operating.

The Body Shop did not respond to a request for comment from TheStreet.   

Read More

Continue Reading

Government

Are Voters Recoiling Against Disorder?

Are Voters Recoiling Against Disorder?

Authored by Michael Barone via The Epoch Times (emphasis ours),

The headlines coming out of the Super…

Published

on

Are Voters Recoiling Against Disorder?

Authored by Michael Barone via The Epoch Times (emphasis ours),

The headlines coming out of the Super Tuesday primaries have got it right. Barring cataclysmic changes, Donald Trump and Joe Biden will be the Republican and Democratic nominees for president in 2024.

(Left) President Joe Biden delivers remarks on canceling student debt at Culver City Julian Dixon Library in Culver City, Calif., on Feb. 21, 2024. (Right) Republican presidential candidate and former U.S. President Donald Trump stands on stage during a campaign event at Big League Dreams Las Vegas in Las Vegas, Nev., on Jan. 27, 2024. (Mario Tama/Getty Images; David Becker/Getty Images)

With Nikki Haley’s withdrawal, there will be no more significantly contested primaries or caucuses—the earliest both parties’ races have been over since something like the current primary-dominated system was put in place in 1972.

The primary results have spotlighted some of both nominees’ weaknesses.

Donald Trump lost high-income, high-educated constituencies, including the entire metro area—aka the Swamp. Many but by no means all Haley votes there were cast by Biden Democrats. Mr. Trump can’t afford to lose too many of the others in target states like Pennsylvania and Michigan.

Majorities and large minorities of voters in overwhelmingly Latino counties in Texas’s Rio Grande Valley and some in Houston voted against Joe Biden, and even more against Senate nominee Rep. Colin Allred (D-Texas).

Returns from Hispanic precincts in New Hampshire and Massachusetts show the same thing. Mr. Biden can’t afford to lose too many Latino votes in target states like Arizona and Georgia.

When Mr. Trump rode down that escalator in 2015, commentators assumed he’d repel Latinos. Instead, Latino voters nationally, and especially the closest eyewitnesses of Biden’s open-border policy, have been trending heavily Republican.

High-income liberal Democrats may sport lawn signs proclaiming, “In this house, we believe ... no human is illegal.” The logical consequence of that belief is an open border. But modest-income folks in border counties know that flows of illegal immigrants result in disorder, disease, and crime.

There is plenty of impatience with increased disorder in election returns below the presidential level. Consider Los Angeles County, America’s largest county, with nearly 10 million people, more people than 40 of the 50 states. It voted 71 percent for Mr. Biden in 2020.

Current returns show county District Attorney George Gascon winning only 21 percent of the vote in the nonpartisan primary. He’ll apparently face Republican Nathan Hochman, a critic of his liberal policies, in November.

Gascon, elected after the May 2020 death of counterfeit-passing suspect George Floyd in Minneapolis, is one of many county prosecutors supported by billionaire George Soros. His policies include not charging juveniles as adults, not seeking higher penalties for gang membership or use of firearms, and bringing fewer misdemeanor cases.

The predictable result has been increased car thefts, burglaries, and personal robberies. Some 120 assistant district attorneys have left the office, and there’s a backlog of 10,000 unprosecuted cases.

More than a dozen other Soros-backed and similarly liberal prosecutors have faced strong opposition or have left office.

St. Louis prosecutor Kim Gardner resigned last May amid lawsuits seeking her removal, Milwaukee’s John Chisholm retired in January, and Baltimore’s Marilyn Mosby was defeated in July 2022 and convicted of perjury in September 2023. Last November, Loudoun County, Virginia, voters (62 percent Biden) ousted liberal Buta Biberaj, who declined to prosecute a transgender student for assault, and in June 2022 voters in San Francisco (85 percent Biden) recalled famed radical Chesa Boudin.

Similarly, this Tuesday, voters in San Francisco passed ballot measures strengthening police powers and requiring treatment of drug-addicted welfare recipients.

In retrospect, it appears the Floyd video, appearing after three months of COVID-19 confinement, sparked a frenzied, even crazed reaction, especially among the highly educated and articulate. One fatal incident was seen as proof that America’s “systemic racism” was worse than ever and that police forces should be defunded and perhaps abolished.

2020 was “the year America went crazy,” I wrote in January 2021, a year in which police funding was actually cut by Democrats in New York, Los Angeles, San Francisco, Seattle, and Denver. A year in which young New York Times (NYT) staffers claimed they were endangered by the publication of Sen. Tom Cotton’s (R-Ark.) opinion article advocating calling in military forces if necessary to stop rioting, as had been done in Detroit in 1967 and Los Angeles in 1992. A craven NYT publisher even fired the editorial page editor for running the article.

Evidence of visible and tangible discontent with increasing violence and its consequences—barren and locked shelves in Manhattan chain drugstores, skyrocketing carjackings in Washington, D.C.—is as unmistakable in polls and election results as it is in daily life in large metropolitan areas. Maybe 2024 will turn out to be the year even liberal America stopped acting crazy.

Chaos and disorder work against incumbents, as they did in 1968 when Democrats saw their party’s popular vote fall from 61 percent to 43 percent.

Views expressed in this article are opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of The Epoch Times or ZeroHedge.

Tyler Durden Sat, 03/09/2024 - 23:20

Read More

Continue Reading

Government

Veterans Affairs Kept COVID-19 Vaccine Mandate In Place Without Evidence

Veterans Affairs Kept COVID-19 Vaccine Mandate In Place Without Evidence

Authored by Zachary Stieber via The Epoch Times (emphasis ours),

The…

Published

on

Veterans Affairs Kept COVID-19 Vaccine Mandate In Place Without Evidence

Authored by Zachary Stieber via The Epoch Times (emphasis ours),

The U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) reviewed no data when deciding in 2023 to keep its COVID-19 vaccine mandate in place.

Doses of a COVID-19 vaccine in Washington in a file image. (Jacquelyn Martin/Pool/AFP via Getty Images)

VA Secretary Denis McDonough said on May 1, 2023, that the end of many other federal mandates “will not impact current policies at the Department of Veterans Affairs.”

He said the mandate was remaining for VA health care personnel “to ensure the safety of veterans and our colleagues.”

Mr. McDonough did not cite any studies or other data. A VA spokesperson declined to provide any data that was reviewed when deciding not to rescind the mandate. The Epoch Times submitted a Freedom of Information Act for “all documents outlining which data was relied upon when establishing the mandate when deciding to keep the mandate in place.”

The agency searched for such data and did not find any.

The VA does not even attempt to justify its policies with science, because it can’t,” Leslie Manookian, president and founder of the Health Freedom Defense Fund, told The Epoch Times.

“The VA just trusts that the process and cost of challenging its unfounded policies is so onerous, most people are dissuaded from even trying,” she added.

The VA’s mandate remains in place to this day.

The VA’s website claims that vaccines “help protect you from getting severe illness” and “offer good protection against most COVID-19 variants,” pointing in part to observational data from the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) that estimate the vaccines provide poor protection against symptomatic infection and transient shielding against hospitalization.

There have also been increasing concerns among outside scientists about confirmed side effects like heart inflammation—the VA hid a safety signal it detected for the inflammation—and possible side effects such as tinnitus, which shift the benefit-risk calculus.

President Joe Biden imposed a slate of COVID-19 vaccine mandates in 2021. The VA was the first federal agency to implement a mandate.

President Biden rescinded the mandates in May 2023, citing a drop in COVID-19 cases and hospitalizations. His administration maintains the choice to require vaccines was the right one and saved lives.

“Our administration’s vaccination requirements helped ensure the safety of workers in critical workforces including those in the healthcare and education sectors, protecting themselves and the populations they serve, and strengthening their ability to provide services without disruptions to operations,” the White House said.

Some experts said requiring vaccination meant many younger people were forced to get a vaccine despite the risks potentially outweighing the benefits, leaving fewer doses for older adults.

By mandating the vaccines to younger people and those with natural immunity from having had COVID, older people in the U.S. and other countries did not have access to them, and many people might have died because of that,” Martin Kulldorff, a professor of medicine on leave from Harvard Medical School, told The Epoch Times previously.

The VA was one of just a handful of agencies to keep its mandate in place following the removal of many federal mandates.

“At this time, the vaccine requirement will remain in effect for VA health care personnel, including VA psychologists, pharmacists, social workers, nursing assistants, physical therapists, respiratory therapists, peer specialists, medical support assistants, engineers, housekeepers, and other clinical, administrative, and infrastructure support employees,” Mr. McDonough wrote to VA employees at the time.

This also includes VA volunteers and contractors. Effectively, this means that any Veterans Health Administration (VHA) employee, volunteer, or contractor who works in VHA facilities, visits VHA facilities, or provides direct care to those we serve will still be subject to the vaccine requirement at this time,” he said. “We continue to monitor and discuss this requirement, and we will provide more information about the vaccination requirements for VA health care employees soon. As always, we will process requests for vaccination exceptions in accordance with applicable laws, regulations, and policies.”

The version of the shots cleared in the fall of 2022, and available through the fall of 2023, did not have any clinical trial data supporting them.

A new version was approved in the fall of 2023 because there were indications that the shots not only offered temporary protection but also that the level of protection was lower than what was observed during earlier stages of the pandemic.

Ms. Manookian, whose group has challenged several of the federal mandates, said that the mandate “illustrates the dangers of the administrative state and how these federal agencies have become a law unto themselves.”

Tyler Durden Sat, 03/09/2024 - 22:10

Read More

Continue Reading

Trending