Connect with us

Uncategorized

Top broker Thuan Nguyen is reinventing himself in 2023

Thuan Nguyen originated $467 million in origination volume this year, which falls well below the $1 billion he reached in 2021 and 2020.

Published

on

When the refi market dried up in 2022, business took a drastic turn for Thuan Nguyen, CEO of Loan Factory and the top loan originator on the Scotsman Guide for the last two years. Prior to the downturn, more than 90% of Nguyen’s business came from refinances.

Nguyen says he has originated $467 million in origination volume this year, closing 1,311 units as of the end of November. This falls well below the landmark $1 billion he reached in 2020 and 2021.

Forecasting another purchase market in 2023, Nguyen started using his proprietary software for something new – to pursue relationships with Realtors. 

“I never had to work with realtors, but now I spend a lot of time working with realtors – supporting them and partnering with them,” Nguyen said in an interview with HousingWire

He built features that cater to Realtors’ needs – such as weekly updates on the housing market, daily alerts of mortgage rates and keeping real estate agents informed of borrowers’ pre-approval status. 

While Nguyen had to cut his workforce to about half this year, he plans to scale his company in 2023 by hiring 1,000 LOs and targeting the purchase market in Loan Factory’s 44 licensed states. 

“I think I built a very good system – good process and good technology. But then it’s been underutilized,” Nguyen said. “If I can open it up and share that with a thousand of LOs (…) instead of having a one to one win, now I can have a 1,000 to one win doing the same thing.”

Read on for Nguyen’s new business strategies for 2023, how he plans to scale his business and prospects for the housing market.

This interview has been condensed and lightly edited for clarity.

Thuan Nguyen, CEO of Loan Factory

Connie Kim: Thuan, you hit a record $2.47 billion in origination volume last year, making you the loan originator with the most origination volume for two consecutive years on the Scotsman Guide. However, with your volume mostly coming from refis, how badly has it affected your business?

Thuan Nguyen: Not good. If you look at that (Scotsman guide) number, about 94% of my business was from refinance. Right now, there’s no more refinance, so it’s a big change.

Earlier this year was much better, but now it’s not good. I close about 60 loans a month only. For sure I won’t be able to make $1 billion [in origination volume] this year. My production until the end of November is 1,311 units or $467 million. That is about one-fifth of the previous year. I don’t even know if I’ll be on top anymore.

It’s affecting everyone, but for me, it’s harder because most of my business comes from refinances. 

CK: Are you doing all these productions by yourself? How is business delegated among team members? 

Nguyen: I do have a team that works for me and supports me. There’s no way I can close that many transactions by myself. I cut [my team] down a lot. I have about five loan officers helping me, and I have more than 30 processors and assistants helping me. 

CK: Has there been layoffs at Loan Factory as well? 

Nguyen: I would say more than 100 layoffs at Loan Factory, and many of them also left voluntarily. Last year we had more than 200 employees, including LOs, processors, and assistants. 

CK: With the market drastically shifting to a purchase market from refinances this year, how have you changed your business strategy, which was refi-dependant? 

Nguyen: I changed my strategy a lot. In the past, I never had to work with Realtors, but now I spend a lot of time working with Realtors – supporting them and partnering with them.

Secondly, I did not recruit LOs, but now I have opened up. My company had only a few LOs, but now I want to grow full speed and focus on recruiting and supporting LOs.

My plan is to open up my platform, my resources, [and] my technology to help LOs who join me. Instead of focusing on myself, I’ll focus on recruiting LOs, training and supporting them and building a great platform so that they can make money easily. We have about two to three dozen independent LOs, but the goal is to have 1,000 LOs in 2023. 

CK: The software you built for Loan Factory – Moso Software – automated a lot of the mortgage business model, whereas other lenders require loan originators to talk to borrowers. How has your software helped build relationships in a purchase mortgage-dependent market? 

Nguyen: We built some features to support Realtors. For example, we have subscriptions that go out to realtors weekly. Out of the 27,000 transactions, we have about 8,000 realtors that closed transactions with us. So the system will put them into a database and email them every week with market updates.

We also have another subscription sending daily alerts to realtors because a lot of them want to know the rates today, especially when rates keep on changing so fast. We also help realtors follow up with their clients. 

A lot of agents send us loan pre-approval requests. Our system would monitor and update the realtor of the process of the borrower’s application. The software helps us monitor the production, the referrals they send to us, the referrals they send to them.

We track the referrals both ways, and that would allow us to improve their relationship. We send them a report every month showing how many transactions they sent us, how many clients we sent to them, and what their status is. So, with technology, we can do a lot of things and we can scale.

We build relationships with existing clients, too. For example, whenever we have a new client, we ask them how they found out about us and then we track that. We reach out to the referral and say thank you.

For example, if our client is happy with us, he refers his friends and family to us. We track that. We know who referred a new client to us; we say thank you. We show our appreciation. And I don’t think anyone out there does this. So we focus a lot on customer service.

CK: With the mortgage origination volume expected to shrink further next year, how do you plan on managing cost-cutting when you plan on hiring more LOs?

Nguyen: We have a great system in place. Everything is pretty much automated, highly automated, so we don’t have to cut costs anymore. Actually, if we have 1,000 LOs joining, we probably have to hire more people in the support system. I don’t expect to cut more, but we expect to hire more people.

I think I built a very good system – good process and good technology. But then it’s been underutilized. If I can open it up and share that with a thousand of LOs, those LOs can use those as a tool to go out and help consumers. Instead of having a one-to-one win, now I can have a 1,000-to-one win doing the same thing.

I’ve been selling subscriptions to my software, but the LO who joins my company can use my software free of charge. When they join, they can take advantage of everything I have – from technology, process, marketing, pricing, support, and even mentorship.

CK: Retail lenders gave out hefty signing bonuses to top producing LOs during the pandemic boom. Is this something you plan on doing to recruit top producers? 

Nguyen: We want to recruit high production LOs, but at the same time, I see that some LOs have a lot of potential, so I’m open to everyone. Most of the signing bonus came from retail lenders. They charge super high interest rates. I don’t think that model will last.

The bottom line is how can they (LOs) attract a lot of clients, how can they close a lot of transactions. When LOs join a company, they’ll be looking for how much they will get paid per transaction, what kind of support do I need, what kind of pricing can I provide to my clients? Those are more important than the signing bonus. 

CK: In addition to hiring more LOs in 2023, are you planning office expansions like you did in 2020?

Nguyen: Actually, I already expanded so fast. Right now, we are already in 44 states. So we cover almost the entire nation. License-wise, we are almost everywhere. The next step would be having 1,000 LOs in the company – that’s how we’ll expand.

CK: There has been a lot of talk about retail LOs moving over to the wholesale channel amid the mortgage downmarket. Have you seen this trend as well? 

Nguyen: Yes, for sure. Retail rates are so high, and I see that being a broker has so many advantages, especially the pricing. I think that trend will continue for sure. I don’t see any advantages to retail LOs.

In the past, many retail loan officers chose to work with lenders because they had a good process, a good system to support them. But now the broker system is improving a lot. Some brokers provide all kinds of support, or even the same level of support. So working with a mortgage broker that has a good support system, good process, [and] good pricing is way better than working for a retail lender. 

CK: Who are your major wholesale partners, and what about them makes it easier for you to work with them?

Nguyen: Rocket Mortgage. We receive a lot of support from them – good pricing always, they have no early payoff penalty fee, underwriting support, no extension costs. There are a lot of perks they give us, and it’s in the contract. They have Pinnacle partners – I believe the top 15% of brokers would get better pricing. 

CK: What kinds of products will gain traction in 2023?

Nguyen: I think right now, non-QMs are pretty popular. The newly released Freddie Mac’s Home Possible mortgage and Fannie Mae’s HomeReady mortgage to help first-time homebuyers and low income borrowers will become popular. Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac are helping people with low income, so I think that will become popular, as it will benefit a lot of people. 

CK: Mortgage rates are expected to go down, but expected home sales numbers aren’t encouraging. Are you still hopeful about seeing an uptick in housing activity?

Nguyen: I think we are already starting to see that with rates starting to decline [as of] two, three weeks ago. I think we already hit the bottom. That’s why I feel optimistic. A lot of people can still afford and qualify. They’ve been waiting, so early next year they’ll jump into the market. 

CK: With mortgage rates expected to drop to 5% levels, some LOs expect refi activity to go from homeowners who locked in rates at 7% levels. Is this in line with your expectations for next year? 

Nguyen: No, because not many people took out loans at that rate. There weren’t a lot of transactions during that period, either. Plus, if their loan amount is small, what’s in it for them to refinance? So I don’t see a lot of support for that. It has to be purchase-heavy for sure next year. 

CK: For those LOs that will be sticking with the industry, what strategies should they be deploying?

Nguyen: It’s all about relationships with family members, friends, [and] realtors, so focus on that and social media. There are so many loan officers, but only some will be successful. LOs will have to spend a lot of time on marketing on social media. Loan officers have to let the public know who they are and why they are good. They have to educate the public. 

It takes a lot of effort, and it’s important to choose a good partner. If you don’t have a good system, good pricing, [and a] good process in place, how can you compete? It’s all about technology and pricing. Consumers got hit with high rates. They want to shop around. So if you work for a retail lender with high rates, how can you win? How can you get the customers? That’s why I say in the next year, you will see more consolidation, more retail LOs joining the broker channel. 

Read More

Continue Reading

Uncategorized

February Employment Situation

By Paul Gomme and Peter Rupert The establishment data from the BLS showed a 275,000 increase in payroll employment for February, outpacing the 230,000…

Published

on

By Paul Gomme and Peter Rupert

The establishment data from the BLS showed a 275,000 increase in payroll employment for February, outpacing the 230,000 average over the previous 12 months. The payroll data for January and December were revised down by a total of 167,000. The private sector added 223,000 new jobs, the largest gain since May of last year.

Temporary help services employment continues a steep decline after a sharp post-pandemic rise.

Average hours of work increased from 34.2 to 34.3. The increase, along with the 223,000 private employment increase led to a hefty increase in total hours of 5.6% at an annualized rate, also the largest increase since May of last year.

The establishment report, once again, beat “expectations;” the WSJ survey of economists was 198,000. Other than the downward revisions, mentioned above, another bit of negative news was a smallish increase in wage growth, from $34.52 to $34.57.

The household survey shows that the labor force increased 150,000, a drop in employment of 184,000 and an increase in the number of unemployed persons of 334,000. The labor force participation rate held steady at 62.5, the employment to population ratio decreased from 60.2 to 60.1 and the unemployment rate increased from 3.66 to 3.86. Remember that the unemployment rate is the number of unemployed relative to the labor force (the number employed plus the number unemployed). Consequently, the unemployment rate can go up if the number of unemployed rises holding fixed the labor force, or if the labor force shrinks holding the number unemployed unchanged. An increase in the unemployment rate is not necessarily a bad thing: it may reflect a strong labor market drawing “marginally attached” individuals from outside the labor force. Indeed, there was a 96,000 decline in those workers.

Earlier in the week, the BLS announced JOLTS (Job Openings and Labor Turnover Survey) data for January. There isn’t much to report here as the job openings changed little at 8.9 million, the number of hires and total separations were little changed at 5.7 million and 5.3 million, respectively.

As has been the case for the last couple of years, the number of job openings remains higher than the number of unemployed persons.

Also earlier in the week the BLS announced that productivity increased 3.2% in the 4th quarter with output rising 3.5% and hours of work rising 0.3%.

The bottom line is that the labor market continues its surprisingly (to some) strong performance, once again proving stronger than many had expected. This strength makes it difficult to justify any interest rate cuts soon, particularly given the recent inflation spike.

Read More

Continue Reading

Uncategorized

Mortgage rates fall as labor market normalizes

Jobless claims show an expanding economy. We will only be in a recession once jobless claims exceed 323,000 on a four-week moving average.

Published

on

Everyone was waiting to see if this week’s jobs report would send mortgage rates higher, which is what happened last month. Instead, the 10-year yield had a muted response after the headline number beat estimates, but we have negative job revisions from previous months. The Federal Reserve’s fear of wage growth spiraling out of control hasn’t materialized for over two years now and the unemployment rate ticked up to 3.9%. For now, we can say the labor market isn’t tight anymore, but it’s also not breaking.

The key labor data line in this expansion is the weekly jobless claims report. Jobless claims show an expanding economy that has not lost jobs yet. We will only be in a recession once jobless claims exceed 323,000 on a four-week moving average.

From the Fed: In the week ended March 2, initial claims for unemployment insurance benefits were flat, at 217,000. The four-week moving average declined slightly by 750, to 212,250


Below is an explanation of how we got here with the labor market, which all started during COVID-19.

1. I wrote the COVID-19 recovery model on April 7, 2020, and retired it on Dec. 9, 2020. By that time, the upfront recovery phase was done, and I needed to model out when we would get the jobs lost back.

2. Early in the labor market recovery, when we saw weaker job reports, I doubled and tripled down on my assertion that job openings would get to 10 million in this recovery. Job openings rose as high as to 12 million and are currently over 9 million. Even with the massive miss on a job report in May 2021, I didn’t waver.

Currently, the jobs openings, quit percentage and hires data are below pre-COVID-19 levels, which means the labor market isn’t as tight as it once was, and this is why the employment cost index has been slowing data to move along the quits percentage.  

2-US_Job_Quits_Rate-1-2

3. I wrote that we should get back all the jobs lost to COVID-19 by September of 2022. At the time this would be a speedy labor market recovery, and it happened on schedule, too

Total employment data

4. This is the key one for right now: If COVID-19 hadn’t happened, we would have between 157 million and 159 million jobs today, which would have been in line with the job growth rate in February 2020. Today, we are at 157,808,000. This is important because job growth should be cooling down now. We are more in line with where the labor market should be when averaging 140K-165K monthly. So for now, the fact that we aren’t trending between 140K-165K means we still have a bit more recovery kick left before we get down to those levels. 




From BLS: Total nonfarm payroll employment rose by 275,000 in February, and the unemployment rate increased to 3.9 percent, the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics reported today. Job gains occurred in health care, in government, in food services and drinking places, in social assistance, and in transportation and warehousing.

Here are the jobs that were created and lost in the previous month:

IMG_5092

In this jobs report, the unemployment rate for education levels looks like this:

  • Less than a high school diploma: 6.1%
  • High school graduate and no college: 4.2%
  • Some college or associate degree: 3.1%
  • Bachelor’s degree or higher: 2.2%
IMG_5093_320f22

Today’s report has continued the trend of the labor data beating my expectations, only because I am looking for the jobs data to slow down to a level of 140K-165K, which hasn’t happened yet. I wouldn’t categorize the labor market as being tight anymore because of the quits ratio and the hires data in the job openings report. This also shows itself in the employment cost index as well. These are key data lines for the Fed and the reason we are going to see three rate cuts this year.

Read More

Continue Reading

Uncategorized

Inside The Most Ridiculous Jobs Report In History: Record 1.2 Million Immigrant Jobs Added In One Month

Inside The Most Ridiculous Jobs Report In History: Record 1.2 Million Immigrant Jobs Added In One Month

Last month we though that the January…

Published

on

Inside The Most Ridiculous Jobs Report In History: Record 1.2 Million Immigrant Jobs Added In One Month

Last month we though that the January jobs report was the "most ridiculous in recent history" but, boy, were we wrong because this morning the Biden department of goalseeked propaganda (aka BLS) published the February jobs report, and holy crap was that something else. Even Goebbels would blush. 

What happened? Let's take a closer look.

On the surface, it was (almost) another blockbuster jobs report, certainly one which nobody expected, or rather just one bank out of 76 expected. Starting at the top, the BLS reported that in February the US unexpectedly added 275K jobs, with just one research analyst (from Dai-Ichi Research) expecting a higher number.

Some context: after last month's record 4-sigma beat, today's print was "only" 3 sigma higher than estimates. Needless to say, two multiple sigma beats in a row used to only happen in the USSR... and now in the US, apparently.

Before we go any further, a quick note on what last month we said was "the most ridiculous jobs report in recent history": it appears the BLS read our comments and decided to stop beclowing itself. It did that by slashing last month's ridiculous print by over a third, and revising what was originally reported as a massive 353K beat to just 229K,  a 124K revision, which was the biggest one-month negative revision in two years!

Of course, that does not mean that this month's jobs print won't be revised lower: it will be, and not just that month but every other month until the November election because that's the only tool left in the Biden admin's box: pretend the economic and jobs are strong, then revise them sharply lower the next month, something we pointed out first last summer and which has not failed to disappoint once.

To be fair, not every aspect of the jobs report was stellar (after all, the BLS had to give it some vague credibility). Take the unemployment rate, after flatlining between 3.4% and 3.8% for two years - and thus denying expectations from Sahm's Rule that a recession may have already started - in February the unemployment rate unexpectedly jumped to 3.9%, the highest since February 2022 (with Black unemployment spiking by 0.3% to 5.6%, an indicator which the Biden admin will quickly slam as widespread economic racism or something).

And then there were average hourly earnings, which after surging 0.6% MoM in January (since revised to 0.5%) and spooking markets that wage growth is so hot, the Fed will have no choice but to delay cuts, in February the number tumbled to just 0.1%, the lowest in two years...

... for one simple reason: last month's average wage surge had nothing to do with actual wages, and everything to do with the BLS estimate of hours worked (which is the denominator in the average wage calculation) which last month tumbled to just 34.1 (we were led to believe) the lowest since the covid pandemic...

... but has since been revised higher while the February print rose even more, to 34.3, hence why the latest average wage data was once again a product not of wages going up, but of how long Americans worked in any weekly period, in this case higher from 34.1 to 34.3, an increase which has a major impact on the average calculation.

While the above data points were examples of some latent weakness in the latest report, perhaps meant to give it a sheen of veracity, it was everything else in the report that was a problem starting with the BLS's latest choice of seasonal adjustments (after last month's wholesale revision), which have gone from merely laughable to full clownshow, as the following comparison between the monthly change in BLS and ADP payrolls shows. The trend is clear: the Biden admin numbers are now clearly rising even as the impartial ADP (which directly logs employment numbers at the company level and is far more accurate), shows an accelerating slowdown.

But it's more than just the Biden admin hanging its "success" on seasonal adjustments: when one digs deeper inside the jobs report, all sorts of ugly things emerge... such as the growing unprecedented divergence between the Establishment (payrolls) survey and much more accurate Household (actual employment) survey. To wit, while in January the BLS claims 275K payrolls were added, the Household survey found that the number of actually employed workers dropped for the third straight month (and 4 in the past 5), this time by 184K (from 161.152K to 160.968K).

This means that while the Payrolls series hits new all time highs every month since December 2020 (when according to the BLS the US had its last month of payrolls losses), the level of Employment has not budged in the past year. Worse, as shown in the chart below, such a gaping divergence has opened between the two series in the past 4 years, that the number of Employed workers would need to soar by 9 million (!) to catch up to what Payrolls claims is the employment situation.

There's more: shifting from a quantitative to a qualitative assessment, reveals just how ugly the composition of "new jobs" has been. Consider this: the BLS reports that in February 2024, the US had 132.9 million full-time jobs and 27.9 million part-time jobs. Well, that's great... until you look back one year and find that in February 2023 the US had 133.2 million full-time jobs, or more than it does one year later! And yes, all the job growth since then has been in part-time jobs, which have increased by 921K since February 2023 (from 27.020 million to 27.941 million).

Here is a summary of the labor composition in the past year: all the new jobs have been part-time jobs!

But wait there's even more, because now that the primary season is over and we enter the heart of election season and political talking points will be thrown around left and right, especially in the context of the immigration crisis created intentionally by the Biden administration which is hoping to import millions of new Democratic voters (maybe the US can hold the presidential election in Honduras or Guatemala, after all it is their citizens that will be illegally casting the key votes in November), what we find is that in February, the number of native-born workers tumbled again, sliding by a massive 560K to just 129.807 million. Add to this the December data, and we get a near-record 2.4 million plunge in native-born workers in just the past 3 months (only the covid crash was worse)!

The offset? A record 1.2 million foreign-born (read immigrants, both legal and illegal but mostly illegal) workers added in February!

Said otherwise, not only has all job creation in the past 6 years has been exclusively for foreign-born workers...

Source: St Louis Fed FRED Native Born and Foreign Born

... but there has been zero job-creation for native born workers since June 2018!

This is a huge issue - especially at a time of an illegal alien flood at the southwest border...

... and is about to become a huge political scandal, because once the inevitable recession finally hits, there will be millions of furious unemployed Americans demanding a more accurate explanation for what happened - i.e., the illegal immigration floodgates that were opened by the Biden admin.

Which is also why Biden's handlers will do everything in their power to insure there is no official recession before November... and why after the election is over, all economic hell will finally break loose. Until then, however, expect the jobs numbers to get even more ridiculous.

Tyler Durden Fri, 03/08/2024 - 13:30

Read More

Continue Reading

Trending