ProShares has rolled out a pair of leveraged equity ETFs providing amplified exposure to two sought-after investment themes: cybersecurity and cloud computing.
The ProShares Ultra Nasdaq Cybersecurity ETF (UCYB US) seeks investment results, before fees and expenses, that correspond to two times (2x) the daily performance of the Nasdaq CTA Cybersecurity Index.
The ProShares Ultra Nasdaq Cloud Computing ETF (SKYU US) seeks investment results, before fees and expenses, that correspond to two times (2x) the daily performance of the ISE CTA Cloud Computing Index.
The funds have listed on Nasdaq and come with net expense ratios of 0.95%.
“The growing need for remote computing, and our increased reliance on secure internet communications and connectivity—existing themes accelerated by the coronavirus pandemic—have expanded the already significant investment opportunities in the cybersecurity and cloud computing industries,” says ProShares CEO Michael L. Sapir. “Our new ETFs will offer investors a way to gain leveraged exposure to these rapidly changing industries in a transparent ETF format.”
UCYB’s reference index provides access to companies listed globally classified as “cybersecurity” by the Consumer Technology Association (CTA)—companies focused primarily on the building, implementation and management of technologies to protect networks, computers and mobile devices from cyber threats.
To be eligible for inclusion in the index, a security must have a minimum market capitalization of $250 million and three-month average daily dollar trading (ADDTV) volume of at least $1m. Initial weights are determined by dividing each security’s three-month ADDTV by the aggregate ADDTV of all index securities. These weights are then adjusted such that no security exceeds 6% or 3% for securities whose three-month ADDTV is not ranked among the top five.
The index is reconstituted semi-annually and rebalanced quarterly. It currently has 40 constituents with an average market capitalization of $20.10 billion. Significant positions include Crowdstrike (7.30%), Zscaler (6.77%), Accenture (5.54%), Cisco (5.49%) and Splunk (4.39%).
SKYU’s index provides access to US-listed companies classified as “cloud computing” by the CTA—firms providing Infrastructure-as-a-Service (servers, storage, and networks), Platform-as-a-Service (systems for the creation of online software), and Software-as-a-Service (software applications delivered over the internet) to their customers and end-users.
To be eligible for inclusion in this index, a security must have a minimum market capitalization of $500m and three-month average daily dollar trading (ADDTV) volume of at least $5m. The index uses a modified equal-weighting methodology based on a “cloud score” assigned by CTA. A company’s cloud score is determined by which particular activities the company is engaged in. Companies that offer IaaS receive 3 points. Those that offer PaaS receive 2 points. Those that offer SaaS receive 1 point. A company can be awarded points for each type of service they offer. Each company’s cloud score is divided by the total sum of the scores awarded to determine the weight of each security, with a maximum weight of 4.5%.
The index is reconstituted and rebalanced quarterly. It currently has 64 constituents with an average market capitalization of $105.17bn. The index includes some highly familiar names, such as Adobe, Alphabet (Google parent), Alibaba, Amazon, Cisco, HP Enterprise IBM, Microsoft, Oracle, Salesforce, SAP, and Zoom.The post ProShares unveils leveraged cybersecurity and cloud computing ETFs on Nasdaq first appeared on ETF Strategy. nasdaq pandemic coronavirus etf
Weekly Investment Update – Should We Listen to the Bond Market?
Since the beginning of the year, 10-year US Treasury yields have risen to an almost 11-month high as markets anticipate a normalizing economy and further, massive fiscal stimulus.
Since the beginning of the year, 10-year US Treasury yields have risen by 25bp to an almost 11-month high as markets anticipate a normalising economy and further, massive fiscal stimulus.
The 10-year Treasury yield hit 1.17% on 8 February, marking its highest point in nearly a year. In the eurozone, the benchmark 10-year Bund yield now stands at around -0.45%. That is about 12bp above where it stood at the end of 2020 and a level not seen since last September. The yield on the 10-year UK Gilt jumped from 0.32% in early February to 0.48% the day after the latest Bank of England monetary policy meeting.
Theory and practice
These higher yields reflect an environment that economic textbooks tell us justify upward pressure on long-term rates: widening budget deficits, accelerating inflation, and accommodative monetary policy.
In the US, the budget resolution approved last week authorises a USD 1.9 trillion coronavirus relief bill. This very large fiscal package could be passed quickly and without much change if the Biden administration chooses to proceed by the way of the reconciliation process. A bipartisan bill, which would need at least 10 Republican Senators supporting it, would likely be much smaller, but still significant in historical terms.
Eurozone bond yields reacted to news of an acceleration in core inflation from 0.2% year-on-year in December to 1.4% in January. Primarily idiosyncratic factors are behind the surge: base effects, the adjustment of the basket of goods and services used to measure price levels, and a VAT rise in Germany. Investors will nonetheless be taking a close look at the detailed inflation numbers due out over the next few days.
Gilt yields rose after more-positive-than-expected Bank of England comments on the economic outlook and indications that a move to negative interest rates was not imminent.
There are also inflation concerns in the US with surveys are pointing to upward price pressures. Market watchers have begun looking for clues in central bankers’ comments on when asset purchases by the Federal Reserve could be tapered.
Fed chair Jerome Powell had indicated that such action would be premature in the current environment. The central bank’s message has been clear: Monetary policy support remains in place.
The ECB has been equally transparent on its stance. In a recent press interview, President Christine Lagarde repeated: “Our commitment to the euro has no limits. We will act for as long as the pandemic is causing a crisis situation in the euro area.”
The crisis is not over
The encouraging progress on vaccination campaigns (at least in some countries) has raised hopes that a return to ‘normal’ life will be possible in a few months’ time. A cyclical recovery would follow for the rest of 2021. We share this view, but would caution that investors not get too far ahead of themselves. The strong 5.5% rebound in global growth expected by the IMF, after a 3.5% contraction in 2020, does not mean that the scars of the crisis will suddenly disappear.
Take the labour market. The US unemployment rate dropped to 6.3% in January and is now at less than half the 14.8% level from last April. Before the pandemic, however, the rate was only 3.5%. Adjusting the current figure for fluctuations related to temporary layoffs and discouraged workers and the unemployment rate is closer to 8%, little changed since last spring.
An old investment adage says, “Don’t fight the Fed.” Indeed, we expect central banks to continue with their massive asset purchases until there is clear progress on growth and inflation.
However premature expectations for much higher inflation and other growth-related concerns may now seem, we believe a short-duration position in eurozone and US benchmark bonds could be opportune at this point. The same goes for a long position on break-even inflation.
We also remain overweight the Italian BTP bond market as the chances of Mario Draghi leading the next government appear to have increased and the risk of early elections has fallen. Investors’ search for yield should provide further support.
Any views expressed here are those of the author as of the date of publication, are based on available information, and are subject to change without notice. Individual portfolio management teams may hold different views and may take different investment decisions for different clients. This document does not constitute investment advice.
The value of investments and the income they generate may go down as well as up and it is possible that investors will not recover their initial outlay. Past performance is no guarantee for future returns.
Investing in emerging markets, or specialised or restricted sectors is likely to be subject to a higher-than-average volatility due to a high degree of concentration, greater uncertainty because less information is available, there is less liquidity or due to greater sensitivity to changes in market conditions (social, political and economic conditions).
Some emerging markets offer less security than the majority of international developed markets. For this reason, services for portfolio transactions, liquidation and conservation on behalf of funds invested in emerging markets may carry greater risk.
Writen by Nathalie Benatia. The post Weekly investment update – Should we listen to the bond market? appeared first on Investors' Corner - The official blog of BNP Paribas Asset Management.unemployment pandemic coronavirus stimulus global growth bonds emerging markets monetary policy fed us treasury euro recovery interest rates unemployment uk germany
Goldman Admits Reddit Raiders Could Crash the Entire Market
Goldman Warns If The Short Squeeze Continues, The Entire Market Could Collapse
Last Friday (Jan 22) we advised readers who thought they had missed the move in Gamestop (they hadn't), to position appropriately in the most shorted Russell 3000 names which included such tickers as FIZZ, DDS, BBBY, AMCX, GOGO and a handful of other names, as it was likely that the short-squeeze was only just starting.
We were right and all of the stocks listed above - and others - exploded higher the coming Monday, and all other days of the week, with results - encapsulated by the WallStreetTips vs Wall Street feud - that has become the top conversation piece across America, while on WSB the only topic is the phenomenal gains generated by going long said most shorted stocks. To wit, the basket of top shorts we compiled on Jan 22 has tripled in the past week.
And while some are quick to blame last week's fireworks on the "dopamine rush" of traders at r/wallstreetbets who seek an outlet to being "copped up with little else to do during the pandemic" (as Bloomberg has done, while also blaming widespread lockdowns and forgetting that it has been Bloomberg that was among the most vocal defenders of the very lockdowns that have given us the short squeeze of the century), the reality is that at the end of the day the strategy unleashed by the subreddit is merely an extension of the bubble dynamics that were made possible by the Federal Reserve (of which Bloomberg is also a very staunch fan) pumping trillions and trillions of shotgunned liquidity into a financial system where there are now bubble visible anywhere one looks. In short, main street finally learned that it too can profit from the lunacy of the money printers at the Marriner Eccles building, and some are very unhappy about that (yes, it will end in tears, but - newsflash - $300 trillion in debt and $120BN in liquidity injections monthly will also end in tears).
That aside, one week later, Goldman has finally caught up with what Zero Hedge readers knew one week ago, and all the way down to a chart showing a basket of the most-shorted Russell 3000 stocks...
... Goldman's David Kostin has published a post-mortem of what happened last week, writing that "the most heavily-shorted stocks have risen by 98% in the past three months, outstripping major short squeezes in 2000 and 2009."
He then points out something we discussed in "Hedge Funds Are Puking Longs To Cover Short-Squeeze Losses", noting that while aggregate short interest levels are remarkably low (imagine what would have happened has shorting been far more aggressive marketwide)...
... "the -4% weekly return of our Hedge Fund VIP list of the most popular hedge fund long positions (GSTHHVIP) showed how excess in one small part of the market can create contagion."
As an aside, and as we showed previously, as the most shorted stocks soared...
... hedge funds were forced to cover (as well as paying for margin calls), and as part of the broader degrossing they also had to sell some of the favorite hedge fund names across the industry, in this case represented by the Goldman Hedge Fund VIP basket.
Yet what may come as a surprise to some, even as hedge funds deleveraged aggressively and actively cut risk this week, gross and net exposures "remain close to the highest levels on record" (something which may come as a huge surprise to Marko Kolanovic who has been erroneously claiming the opposite), suggesting that if the squeeze continues, hedge funds are set for much more pain.
According to Goldman Sachs Prime Services, this week "represented the largest active hedge fund de-grossing since February 2009. Funds in their coverage sold long positions and covered shorts in every sector" and yet "despite this active deleveraging, hedge fund net and gross exposures on a mark-to-market basis both remain close to the highest levels on record, indicating ongoing risk of positioning-driven sell-offs."
With that in mind, here are Kostin's big picture thoughts:
It was a placid week in the US stock market – provided one was a long-only mutual fund manager. US equity mutual funds and ETFs had $2 billion of net inflows last week (+$10 billion YTD). Although the typical large-cap core mutual fund fell by 2% this week, it has generated a return of +1.3% YTD vs. S&P 500 down -1.1%. However, life was very different last week if one managed a hedge fund. The typical US equity long/short fund returned -7% this week and has returned -6% YTD.
With the average WSB portfolio up double digits this past week, one can see why hedge funds are upset. Anyway, moving on:
The past 25 years have witnessed a number of sharp short squeezes in the US equity market, but none as extreme as has occurred recently.In the last three months, a basket containing the 50 Russell 3000 stocks with market caps above $1 billion and the largest short interest as a share of float (GSCBMSAL) has rallied by 98%. This exceeded the 77% return of highly-shorted stocks during 2Q 2020, a 56% rally in mid-2009, and two distinct 72% rallies during the Tech Bubble in 1999 and 2000. This week the basket’s trailing 5-, 10-, and 21-day returns registered as the largest on record.
Thanks Goldman, and yes, your "brisk assessment" would have been more useful to your clients if it had come before the event (like, for example, this) instead of after.
Kostin then goes on to point out that the "mooning" in the most shorted stocks took place even though aggregate short interest was near record low (imagine what would have happened had short interest been higher), which is odd because historically, "major short squeezes have typically taken place as aggregate short interest declined from elevated levels. In contrast, the recent short squeeze has been driven by concentrated short positions in smaller companies, many of which had lagged dramatically and were perceived by most investors to be in secular decline" to wit:
Unusually, the rally of the most heavily-shorted stocks has taken place against a backdrop of very low levels of aggregate short interest. At the start of this year, the median S&P 500 stock had short interest equating to just 1.5% of market cap, matching mid-2000 as the lowest share in at least the last 25 years. In the past, major short squeezes have typically taken place as aggregate short interest declined from elevated levels. In contrast, the recent short squeeze has been driven by concentrated short positions in smaller companies, many of which had lagged dramatically and were perceived by most investors to be in secular decline.
Of course, there is nothing "historical" about what happened last week, because - as we all know - the biggest difference between the typical short squeeze of the past and the recent rally in heavily-shorted stocks "was the degree of involvement of retail traders, who also appear to have catalyzed sharp moves in other parts of the market." Why thank you WSB, but that's ok - you will be handsomely rewarded.
Last week we discussed the surging trading activity and share prices of penny stocks, firms with negative earnings, and extremely high-growth, high-multiple stocks. These trends have all accompanied a large increase in online broker trading activity. A basket of retail favorites (ticker: GSXURFAV) has returned +17% YTD and +179% since the March 2020 low, outperforming both the S&P 500 (+72%) and our Hedge Fund VIP list of the most popular hedge fund long positions (GSTHHVIP, +106%).
So why does this matter? One simple reason: contrary to the bizarrely nonchalant optimism spouted earlier this week by JPMorgan's Marko Kolanovic who said "any market pullback, such as one driven by repositioning by a segment of the long-short community (and related to stocks of insignificant size), is a buying opportunity, in our view," Goldman has a far more dismal take on recent events, and writes that "this week demonstrated that unsustainable excess in one small part of the market has the potential to tip a row of dominoes and create broader turmoil."
He then picks up on what he said last weekend when responding to Goldman client concerns about a stock bubble, which we summarized in "Goldman's Clients Are Freaking Out About A Stock Bubble: Here Is The Bank's Response", and which turned out to be 100% warranted, and writes that "most of the bubble-like dynamics we highlighted last week have taken place in stocks constituting very small portions of total US equity market cap. Indeed, many of the shorts dominating headlines this week were (prior to this week) small-cap stocks. But large short squeezes led investors short these stocks to cover their positions and also reduce long positions, leading other holders of common positions to cut exposures in turn."
As a result, Goldman's Hedge Fund VIP list declined by 4%. Which is a problem because as Kostin concludes, "in recent years elevated crowding, low turnover, and high concentration have been consistent patterns, boosting the risk that one fund’s unwind could snowball through the market."
Translation: if WSB continues to push the most shorted stocks higher, the entire market could crash.
And since Kostin admits that "the retail trading boom can continue" as "an abundance of US household cash should continue to fuel the trading boom" with more than 50% of the $5 trillion in money market mutual funds owned by households and is $1 trillion greater than before the pandemic, what happens in the coming week - i.e., if the short squeeze persists - could have profound implications for the future of capital markets.
Invesco’s AT1 CoCo bond ETF passes $1 billion AUM milestone
The Invesco AT1 Capital Bond UCITS ETF has surpassed $1 billion in assets under management as investors have continued to seek out income and diversification opportunities for their portfolios. Paul Syms, Head of EMEA ETF Fixed Income Product Management..
The Invesco AT1 Capital Bond UCITS ETF has surpassed $1 billion in assets under management as investors have continued to seek out income and diversification opportunities for their portfolios.
Around $500 million of net new assets have been invested in the ETF since the height of the pandemic volatility in March 2020, with AUM now representing an 85% share of the AT1 ETF market in Europe, according to data from Invesco.
Competing products in the contingent convertible (CoCo) bond space include the UC Axiom Global CoCo Bonds UCITS ETF (CCNV GY), a collaboration of UniCredit and Axiom Alternative Investments, and the WisdomTree AT1 CoCo Bond UCITS ETF (CCBO LN) from WisdomTree. A China Post Global ETF providing exposure to the asset class was closed down in 2019.
Invesco notes that AT1s are a specific type of debt instrument issued by European banks and other financial institutions. Their yields are not driven by the riskiness of the issuer, as with other high-yield bonds, but by a contingency element that triggers a conversion into cash or common equity if the issuer’s capital drops below a pre-set level. AT1s are intended to act as a buffer in extreme conditions and will have a lower credit rating, and in turn higher coupon, than the senior debt issued by the same issuer.
The Invesco AT1 Capital Bond UCITS ETF aims to follow the performance of the iBoxx USD Contingent Convertible Liquid Developed Market AT1 (8/5% Issuer Cap) Index, calculated by IHS Markit. The index focuses exclusively on the USD-denominated AT1 bond market, the deepest and most liquid in which European banks issue AT1 bonds. Through the ETF, investors get exposure to over 80% of European banks by market cap, including all the largest issuers.
The fund trades on the London Stock Exchange in USD (AT1 LN) and sterling (AT1P LN), on Borsa Italiana in euros (AT1 IM), and on SIX Swiss Exchange in USD (IAT1 SW). It comes with an annual ongoing charges figure of 0.39%.
Commenting on the milestone, Paul Syms, Head of EMEA ETF Fixed Income Product Management at Invesco, said: “Our ETF has grown to such scale that it has opened the door to larger investors who may have holding limits and require a vehicle that can accommodate bigger trade sizes.”
He added: “The first AT1 bonds were launched in 2013 and for the first few years, when the market was relatively small and largely unknown, there were more opportunities to add value through security selection. However, the market has matured since then. More is known about AT1s and the market is more liquid, especially for the $140bn worth of issues denominated in dollars. The market has all the ingredients you need to develop a passive strategy. And although we have the largest AT1 ETF in Europe, its AUM is less than 1% of the value of the USD-denominated AT1 market. That means there is still huge growth potential.”
A recent report published by Invesco entitled ‘AT1 bonds: Better as beta?’ underscored the increasing difficulties to deliver real outperformance through an actively managed approach given the maturity of the AT1 market. The report concluded that the correlation between the bonds in the sector is so high that it dramatically reduces the opportunities for portfolio managers to generate excess returns through security selection.
The analysis showed that between June 2018 and the market sell-off in March 2020, the median pairwise correlation across a sample of 20 of the largest and most liquid USD AT1 bonds over six-month rolling periods was 78%. During the sell-off, the correlations spiked to nearly 100%. A likely reason for this high correlation, the report found, was that financial sector credit is an unusually narrow and homogenous investment universe.
Gary Buxton, Head of EMEA ETFs and Indexed Strategies at Invesco, commented: “We aim to provide investors the tools they need to construct better portfolios, which often involves a combination of passive and active strategies. The key is knowing where and when to use one or the other. AT1s are an interesting example, as they have transitioned from being purely an active play to now being arguably more suited to a passive approach. The recent flows into our ETF are testament to investors recognising and taking advantage of these developments.”The post Invesco’s AT1 CoCo bond ETF passes $1 billion AUM milestone first appeared on ETF Strategy. bonds pandemic etf european europe china
Government12 hours ago
Six Natural Gas Investments to Buy as Energy Prices Soar Amid War
Stocks13 hours ago
Analysts note parallels with March 2020: Will this time be different?
Economics23 hours ago
Trevali Provides Update on Search at Perkoa Mine: No Survivors Found in Refuge Chamber
Economics18 hours ago
Atradius: Australian businesses battle high levels of unpaid debt
Economics21 hours ago
Global Industry Statement on the WTO Moratorium on Customs Duties on Electronic Transmissions
Government21 hours ago
“The Real President Is Whoever Controls The Teleprompter”: Musk Delivers Scathing Criticism Of Biden
Spread & Containment6 hours ago
Home Values Are Growing the Most in Suburbs, but Demand May Be Shifting Back Toward City Centers
Spread & Containment20 hours ago
VIRI: Enrollment Complete in FORTRESS Trial; Results Expected in September 2022…