Connect with us

Now We are Getting Serious

Now We are Getting Serious

Published

on


There is folklore among many investors that is preventing an understanding of what is happening. The fiction is that the Fed has killed the last three expansions by pursuing too tight of monetary policy. In fact, the previous three downturns were caused by financial crises (the S&L Crisis, the Tech Bubble, and the Great Financial Crisis) that spilled over and hit the real economy. If anything, policy was too accommodative for too long, and regulatory authority was too lax. This time it is a shock to the real economy that is threatening a financial crisis. The volatility has exploded and forcing margin calls, distressed liquidation, illiquid conditions in the biggest and deepest markets, like US Treasuries. Corporations are drawing down credit lines, which impacts banks' liquidity.

The Fed has already taken several steps to help minimize the systemic financial risks stemming from the real and anticipated economic shock. It delivered a 50 bp emergency rate cut, boosted the size of its repo operations, and introduced a new one-month term repo.  As stocks were cratering on March 12, the Fed announced a $500 bln three-month repo operation (and more to come). It also signaled a resumption of QE by announcing it would buy government bonds across the curve matching the maturity profile of the outstanding marketable Treasury securities.

Ahead of the weekend, it conducted another $500 bln three-month operation and a $500 bln one-month repo. Similar operations are planned for the week ahead as well. However, the challenge with this approach is that it still requires the banks to participate and then to re-lend. Consider that beginning with the unexpected $500 bln three-month repo operation on March 12 and the same on another one on March 13 alongside a $500 bln made available in one-month repo operation, the banks drew less than 10% of the funding made available.

The Fed's work is not done. The playbook, as it were, says then when close to the zero-bound, it is essential to act swiftly and deliberately to be effective. The current fed funds target is 1.00%-1.25%. The market is pricing in a 100 bp cut by the FOMC next week that will bring the target range to the low of Great Financial crisis of 0.0-0.25%. Fed officials have debated the risks and rewards of negative interest rates, and they seem determined to respect the zero-bound.

It does, though, raise the issue of what it will pay on reserves. Although many, including some Fed officials, talk about interest on excess reserves (IOER), the Fed pays interest on required reserves as well.  Paying interest on reserves was an authority granted to the central bank during the GFC.  It is not clear if authority allows it to  "pay" a negative yield.

There are crisis-era facilities the Fed could resurrect to ensure that the financial system does not breakdown under what could be an economic tsunami. Economists are slashing growth forecasts and now, with suggesting a recession, by which they mean two contracting quarters of GDP, has likely begun. During the Great Financial Crisis, the Federal Reserve helped support commercial paper issuance (Commercial Paper Funding Facility 2008-2010), by essentially creating a backstop funding mechanism. The Fed also helped facilitate consumption (Term Asset-Backed Loan Facility 2009-2010) through purchases of asset-backed securities collateralized by student loans, auto loans, credit cards, and Small Business Administration loans.

Such measures have been criticized in part because they blur the separation of monetary and fiscal policy.  And that is the point: because it is not, in essence, a financial crisis, monetary measures are having a limiting impact on the animal spirits and investor confidence. If the drop equities and yields stalled ahead of the weekend, it was arguably linked to two fiscal developments.

The first was in the US. House Speaker Pelosi initially threatened to vote on a spending bill and delivered a fait accompli to the White House that had not presented a plan besides calling for a payroll savings tax cut. She hinted a deal was close late on March 12. Pelosi also maneuvered so that the Republican-led Senate was forced to postpone next week's vacation. Late Friday, a deal was struck, and the House approved it. With the President's support, the Senate will likely pass it on Monday. Trump gradually recognized the severity of the challenge and declared a national state of emergency, which frees up $50 bln in funding and waived interest on all federal student loans.

Instead of selling oil out of the Strategic Petroleum Reserve as this year and next year's budget agreements require, Trump wants to take advantage of the steep decline to top up the reserves. This could be an indirect way to support US producers.Sounds interesting, even if a distraction from more urgent issues, but there is less than meets the eye. The SPR can hold about 715 mln barrels. It currently has about 635 mln barrels. There is scope to buy around 80 mln barrels or 225k barrels a day for the next year.   

The other fiscal development was in Germany. We had previously noted that Merkel's tone had changed earlier last week. Still, it was slow to percolate higher until the end of the week when several fiscal measures were announced deferring tax payments (as the US did by executive decision) and a loan commitment via KfW with 550 bln euro (~$610 bln) capacity. Even under the ordoliberalism precepts and its resistance to the calls, especially from debtors, to embrace Keynesian demand management, there is room to respond to emergencies. It does not mean the "black zero" is dead. It means it may not be as masochistic as it is often accused.

The EC is on the verge of formally declaring what it recognized for Italy and relaxed fiscal and state-aid to business rules. The EU's own investment fund can be scaled up if necessary. It currently guarantees 8 bln euros of loans 100k small and medium-sized businesses. It announced a 37 bln euro "Corona Investment Fund" that would use budget reserves to support companies and health-care systems.

The Bank of Japan meeting concludes the day (March 19) after the FOMC meeting. Although the connection is tangential at best, the fact that the ECB did not cut its rates deeper into negative territory was seen as a hint that the BOJ may not feel obligated to cut rates either. This does not mean that it won't do anything to complement the two sets of emergency measures that the Abe government has announced.

It could boost its ETF purchase target from the current JPY6 trillion (~$58 bln) a year. It has already bought more than JPY500 bln this month, which just half over. It can scale-up its loan program to support both commercial paper and corporate bonds. It may also extend the maturities of the corporate it purchases and increase the range of bonds it buys to include, for example, local government bonds and government-guaranteed notes. 

Japanese officials get concerned about the yen as below JPY105. However, there is little they could effectively do. The bar to unilateral intervention is high as it would risk the ire of the mercurial American President. Moreover, the valuation is not stretched. According to the OECD's model of purchasing power parity is slightly under-valued (PPP ~JPY103.35). When thinking through the flows, remember that given the stock of current investment and the wide interest rate differentials, currency hedging can be the critical element to total returns. There has been a real shortage of dollars by yen accounts, as reflecting in the cross-currency basis swaps, which are at two-year extremes, the LIBOR/OIS spread. 

Ahead of the weekend, China announced a cut in required reserves for some commercial lenders to promote lending to small and medium-sized businesses, which frees up about CNY550 bln (~$80 bln) for new lending. On the 20th of each month, China's Loan Prime Rate is set based on a survey of participating banks. It fell 10 bp in February to 4.05%. The cautious call is for another 10 bp decline. It is more likely to be larger than smaller. Meanwhile, a range of indicators suggests that Chinese factories are re-opening, but the demand shock is beginning to be seen too.

Just as last week was winding down, the Bank of Canada surprised with a 50 bp rate cut, quickly following on the heels of a similar move at the scheduled policy meeting on March 4. The emergency cut was delivered alongside Ottawa's new efforts to support small and medium-sized businesses by funding the Business Development Bank and Export Development Bank (C$10 bln). After the Fed's likely rate cut, the 75 bp Bank of Canada bank rate will be the highest in the G7. Given the shocks, another rate cut next month cannot be ruled out. There was not much of a reaction by the Canadian dollar to the surprise rate cut and fiscal announcement, but as the equity market strengthened, the Loonie recovered somewhat. 

While fiscal and monetary efforts are necessary, they may not prove sufficient. The markets are incredible aggregators of information, and until the peak of the pandemic, it is difficult for investors to discount the likely impact. Chancellor Merkel opined that 60%-70% may be vulnerable to infection by the virus. If lower population density, greater numbers that can work from home (~30%), the end of the normal flu season, helps keep the US contagion to an optimistic 40% that is around 130 mln people.

There are other measures officials can take if needed. Italy and Spain introduced one-day bans on short-sales of some sectors ahead of the weekend. A broader and longer ban or more aggressive uptick rules may be considered. Declaring a bank holiday and shutting the markets for a few days may withstand a cost-benefit analysis under certain conditions. The purpose of these measures would give time to investors and businesses to see developments, and it could also help forestall the economic crisis become a financial crisis. There are permanent swap lines between the Federal Reserve and several foreign central banks (ECB, Bank of Canada, Central Bank of Mexico, Bank of England, Swiss National Bank, and the Bank of Japan). The central banks can secure dollars from the US and distribute them via auctions to their member banks.

The G7 will hold a video call on Monday, and there are new hopes of coordination, but it is not clear what can be coordinated at this point. Everyone is moving ahead within their own political and institutional framework. A bank holiday, some limit on short sales, and intervention to counter undesirable levels of volatility in the foreign exchange market would be more effective if coordinated, but these do not appear on Monday's agenda.   



Disclaimer








Read More

Continue Reading

Uncategorized

February Employment Situation

By Paul Gomme and Peter Rupert The establishment data from the BLS showed a 275,000 increase in payroll employment for February, outpacing the 230,000…

Published

on

By Paul Gomme and Peter Rupert

The establishment data from the BLS showed a 275,000 increase in payroll employment for February, outpacing the 230,000 average over the previous 12 months. The payroll data for January and December were revised down by a total of 167,000. The private sector added 223,000 new jobs, the largest gain since May of last year.

Temporary help services employment continues a steep decline after a sharp post-pandemic rise.

Average hours of work increased from 34.2 to 34.3. The increase, along with the 223,000 private employment increase led to a hefty increase in total hours of 5.6% at an annualized rate, also the largest increase since May of last year.

The establishment report, once again, beat “expectations;” the WSJ survey of economists was 198,000. Other than the downward revisions, mentioned above, another bit of negative news was a smallish increase in wage growth, from $34.52 to $34.57.

The household survey shows that the labor force increased 150,000, a drop in employment of 184,000 and an increase in the number of unemployed persons of 334,000. The labor force participation rate held steady at 62.5, the employment to population ratio decreased from 60.2 to 60.1 and the unemployment rate increased from 3.66 to 3.86. Remember that the unemployment rate is the number of unemployed relative to the labor force (the number employed plus the number unemployed). Consequently, the unemployment rate can go up if the number of unemployed rises holding fixed the labor force, or if the labor force shrinks holding the number unemployed unchanged. An increase in the unemployment rate is not necessarily a bad thing: it may reflect a strong labor market drawing “marginally attached” individuals from outside the labor force. Indeed, there was a 96,000 decline in those workers.

Earlier in the week, the BLS announced JOLTS (Job Openings and Labor Turnover Survey) data for January. There isn’t much to report here as the job openings changed little at 8.9 million, the number of hires and total separations were little changed at 5.7 million and 5.3 million, respectively.

As has been the case for the last couple of years, the number of job openings remains higher than the number of unemployed persons.

Also earlier in the week the BLS announced that productivity increased 3.2% in the 4th quarter with output rising 3.5% and hours of work rising 0.3%.

The bottom line is that the labor market continues its surprisingly (to some) strong performance, once again proving stronger than many had expected. This strength makes it difficult to justify any interest rate cuts soon, particularly given the recent inflation spike.

Read More

Continue Reading

Spread & Containment

Another beloved brewery files Chapter 11 bankruptcy

The beer industry has been devastated by covid, changing tastes, and maybe fallout from the Bud Light scandal.

Published

on

Before the covid pandemic, craft beer was having a moment. Most cities had multiple breweries and taprooms with some having so many that people put together the brewery version of a pub crawl.

It was a period where beer snobbery ruled the day and it was not uncommon to hear bar patrons discuss the makeup of the beer the beer they were drinking. This boom period always seemed destined for failure, or at least a retraction as many markets seemed to have more craft breweries than they could support.

Related: Fast-food chain closes more stores after Chapter 11 bankruptcy

The pandemic, however, hastened that downfall. Many of these local and regional craft breweries counted on in-person sales to drive their business. 

And while many had local and regional distribution, selling through a third party comes with much lower margins. Direct sales drove their business and the pandemic forced many breweries to shut down their taprooms during the period where social distancing rules were in effect.

During those months the breweries still had rent and employees to pay while little money was coming in. That led to a number of popular beermakers including San Francisco's nationally-known Anchor Brewing as well as many regional favorites including Chicago’s Metropolitan Brewing, New Jersey’s Flying Fish, Denver’s Joyride Brewing, Tampa’s Zydeco Brew Werks, and Cleveland’s Terrestrial Brewing filing bankruptcy.

Some of these brands hope to survive, but others, including Anchor Brewing, fell into Chapter 7 liquidation. Now, another domino has fallen as a popular regional brewery has filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection.

Overall beer sales have fallen.

Image source: Shutterstock

Covid is not the only reason for brewery bankruptcies

While covid deserves some of the blame for brewery failures, it's not the only reason why so many have filed for bankruptcy protection. Overall beer sales have fallen driven by younger people embracing non-alcoholic cocktails, and the rise in popularity of non-beer alcoholic offerings,

Beer sales have fallen to their lowest levels since 1999 and some industry analysts

"Sales declined by more than 5% in the first nine months of the year, dragged down not only by the backlash and boycotts against Anheuser-Busch-owned Bud Light but the changing habits of younger drinkers," according to data from Beer Marketer’s Insights published by the New York Post.

Bud Light parent Anheuser Busch InBev (BUD) faced massive boycotts after it partnered with transgender social media influencer Dylan Mulvaney. It was a very small partnership but it led to a right-wing backlash spurred on by Kid Rock, who posted a video on social media where he chastised the company before shooting up cases of Bud Light with an automatic weapon.

Another brewery files Chapter 11 bankruptcy

Gizmo Brew Works, which does business under the name Roth Brewing Company LLC, filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection on March 8. In its filing, the company checked the box that indicates that its debts are less than $7.5 million and it chooses to proceed under Subchapter V of Chapter 11. 

"Both small business and subchapter V cases are treated differently than a traditional chapter 11 case primarily due to accelerated deadlines and the speed with which the plan is confirmed," USCourts.gov explained. 

Roth Brewing/Gizmo Brew Works shared that it has 50-99 creditors and assets $100,000 and $500,000. The filing noted that the company does expect to have funds available for unsecured creditors. 

The popular brewery operates three taprooms and sells its beer to go at those locations.

"Join us at Gizmo Brew Works Craft Brewery and Taprooms located in Raleigh, Durham, and Chapel Hill, North Carolina. Find us for entertainment, live music, food trucks, beer specials, and most importantly, great-tasting craft beer by Gizmo Brew Works," the company shared on its website.

The company estimates that it has between $1 and $10 million in liabilities (a broad range as the bankruptcy form does not provide a space to be more specific).

Gizmo Brew Works/Roth Brewing did not share a reorganization or funding plan in its bankruptcy filing. An email request for comment sent through the company's contact page was not immediately returned.

 

Read More

Continue Reading

Government

Walmart joins Costco in sharing key pricing news

The massive retailers have both shared information that some retailers keep very close to the vest.

Published

on

As we head toward a presidential election, the presumed candidates for both parties will look for issues that rally undecided voters. 

The economy will be a key issue, with Democrats pointing to job creation and lowering prices while Republicans will cite the layoffs at Big Tech companies, high housing prices, and of course, sticky inflation.

The covid pandemic created a perfect storm for inflation and higher prices. It became harder to get many items because people getting sick slowed down, or even stopped, production at some factories.

Related: Popular mall retailer shuts down abruptly after bankruptcy filing

It was also a period where demand increased while shipping, trucking and delivery systems were all strained or thrown out of whack. The combination led to product shortages and higher prices.

You might have gone to the grocery store and not been able to buy your favorite paper towel brand or find toilet paper at all. That happened partly because of the supply chain and partly due to increased demand, but at the end of the day, it led to higher prices, which some consumers blamed on President Joe Biden's administration.

Biden, of course, was blamed for the price increases, but as inflation has dropped and grocery prices have fallen, few companies have been up front about it. That's probably not a political choice in most cases. Instead, some companies have chosen to lower prices more slowly than they raised them.

However, two major retailers, Walmart (WMT) and Costco, have been very honest about inflation. Walmart Chief Executive Doug McMillon's most recent comments validate what Biden's administration has been saying about the state of the economy. And they contrast with the economic picture being painted by Republicans who support their presumptive nominee, Donald Trump.

Walmart has seen inflation drop in many key areas.

Image source: Joe Raedle/Getty Images

Walmart sees lower prices

McMillon does not talk about lower prices to make a political statement. He's communicating with customers and potential customers through the analysts who cover the company's quarterly-earnings calls.

During Walmart's fiscal-fourth-quarter-earnings call, McMillon was clear that prices are going down.

"I'm excited about the omnichannel net promoter score trends the team is driving. Across countries, we continue to see a customer that's resilient but looking for value. As always, we're working hard to deliver that for them, including through our rollbacks on food pricing in Walmart U.S. Those were up significantly in Q4 versus last year, following a big increase in Q3," he said.

He was specific about where the chain has seen prices go down.

"Our general merchandise prices are lower than a year ago and even two years ago in some categories, which means our customers are finding value in areas like apparel and hard lines," he said. "In food, prices are lower than a year ago in places like eggs, apples, and deli snacks, but higher in other places like asparagus and blackberries."

McMillon said that in other areas prices were still up but have been falling.

"Dry grocery and consumables categories like paper goods and cleaning supplies are up mid-single digits versus last year and high teens versus two years ago. Private-brand penetration is up in many of the countries where we operate, including the United States," he said.

Costco sees almost no inflation impact

McMillon avoided the word inflation in his comments. Costco  (COST)  Chief Financial Officer Richard Galanti, who steps down on March 15, has been very transparent on the topic.

The CFO commented on inflation during his company's fiscal-first-quarter-earnings call.

"Most recently, in the last fourth-quarter discussion, we had estimated that year-over-year inflation was in the 1% to 2% range. Our estimate for the quarter just ended, that inflation was in the 0% to 1% range," he said.

Galanti made clear that inflation (and even deflation) varied by category.

"A bigger deflation in some big and bulky items like furniture sets due to lower freight costs year over year, as well as on things like domestics, bulky lower-priced items, again, where the freight cost is significant. Some deflationary items were as much as 20% to 30% and, again, mostly freight-related," he added.

Read More

Continue Reading

Trending