Connect with us

Government

No coronavirus stimulus checks if no deal by Friday

No coronavirus stimulus checks if no deal by Friday

Published

on

second stimulus package check

Editor’s note: This article contains the latest news on the coronavirus stimulus package. It’s updated regularly with news about coronavirus stimulus checks and related issues.

August 6, 2020 Update: The White House and Democratic leaders are slowly moving closer to a deal on the next relief package and more coronavirus stimulus checks. The two sides met again on Wednesday in an attempt to strike a deal on the next stimulus package.

They hope to have an agreement by the end of the week. If there is no deal by tomorrow, there might be no deal at all. Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin and White House Chief of Staff Mark Meadows told Republicans on Wednesday during a close-door lunch that they might stop the negotiations if a deal is not made by Friday, according to USA Today.

Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell has kept his distance from the talks, which some Republican senators find to be a bit strange. According to The Hill, McConnell has stayed away from issues that divide Republicans over the last several years.

The issue of the next stimulus bill has been extremely divisive for the GOP. A Republican senator told The Hill that 20 Republicans aren’t on board with the GOP’s proposal for the next stimulus bill. The senator said conservatives are worried about saddling the next two generations with enormous piles of debt.

Another step toward second coronavirus stimulus check

August 5, 2020 Update: Republicans, Democrats and the White House agree that they should send Americans a second round of coronavirus stimulus checks. However, negotiations on other provisions of the next stimulus package continue to hold things up.

Democrats refuse to negotiate, and they may have already won on one key area of disagreement. Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell told reporters he is “prepared to support” a stimulus bill that includes an extension of the $600 in weekly federal unemployment benefits.

Republicans have wanted to reduce the amount of the extra benefit, so people aren’t being paid more on unemployment than they were getting paid on the job. McConnell’s agreement to allow the extra $600 in weekly unemployment benefits into the next stimulus package could go a long way toward getting the bill passed.

That means Americans have moved a bit closer to receiving the second round of coronavirus stimulus checks. However, lawmakers are still far from a compromise on other provisions. Some senators are calling for their August recess to be cancelled so they can get the stimulus package passed.

House lawmakers have been told to be prepared to return to Washington to vote on the package after the Senate passes it.

A “little” progress made on deal

August 4, 2020 Update: The second round of coronavirus stimulus checks remains on hold today as lawmakers continue to bicker about what to include in the next package. Bloomberg reports that House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin indicated that Monday’s negotiations brought “a little bit” of progress.

However, despite that progress, lawmakers on both sides of the aisle remain wide apart in what they want to see in the next stimulus package. At this point, a second round of coronavirus stimulus checks appears to be the only thing Republicans and Democrats can agree on.

Lawmakers remain split over unemployment benefits as the extra $600 in weekly benefits was allowed to expire without a new deal. Democrats want to extend the $600 to allow people to continue to get paid more on unemployment than they did on the job.

However, Republicans want to reduce the amount of the extra unemployment benefit. Democrats are unwilling to compromise on the amount, demanding that it be kept at $600 a week instead of allowing a smaller amount so that a deal can be made.

In order for a deal to be made, both parties will have to compromise. That means the Republicans will have to allow more than $200 in weekly benefits, while Democrats will have to allow for less than $600.

Other key issues holding up a second round of coronavirus stimulus checks include financial aid for state and local governments and a number of pet projects lawmakers on both sides of the aisle and the White House are trying to tack on.

August 3, 2020 Update: Lawmakers supposedly made some progress on negotiations about the next round of coronavirus stimulus checks and other provisions. However, news reports this morning downplay any alleged progress.

CNN is reporting that despite the optimistic talk, lawmakers are still far from striking a deal on the next stimulus package. The deadline for extending the extra unemployment benefit has come and gone without a deal. That means jobless Americans will see their income drop dramatically this week.

Republicans and Democrats agree on $1,200 coronavirus stimulus checks. However, the Democrats’ refusal to pass the next package in pieces the way Republicans have suggested means that there won’t be any checks until there is agreement on other, more controversial provisions.

Unemployment remains the sticking point between Republicans and Democrats. Democrats want to extend the extra $600 in weekly benefits, but Republicans want to reduce the amount so that people don’t continue to get paid more on unemployment than they did on the job.

Key Democrats and White House officials will be meeting again today to see if any progress can be made on a deal for the next coronavirus stimulus package and a second round of checks.

July 31, 2020 Update: The Senate has left for the weekend without passing a stimulus package for the House to vote on. That means there won’t be any coronavirus stimulus checks or other provisions because lawmakers just can’t get along.

In a further demonstration of just how much bickering has been occurring on Capitol Hill, four Republican centers proposed yet another bill for coronavirus stimulus checks. Sens. Marco Rubio, Mitt Romney, Steve Daines and Bill Cassidy introduced the Coronavirus Assistance for American Families Act, which calls for $1,000 coronavirus stimulus checks.

The bill would send $4,000 to a family of four, so while it means less for individuals, families would receive more because dependents would receive $1,000 each instead of $500, like in the CARES Act and HEALS Act. The bill also differs from the CARES Act because it includes dependents of all ages, including those with disabilities and college students.

It also makes U.S. citizens married to foreign nationals eligible for the money, although foreign nationals and others with Individual Taxpayer Identification Numbers would not be eligible to receive the payments.

Like with the CARES Act and HEALS Act, individuals earning up to $75,000 and couples earning up to $150,000 would be eligible for the coronavirus stimulus checks. The amount of the payments would be reduced by 5% of an individual’s adjusted gross income over those levels.

Trump wants second coronavirus stimulus check to be more than $1,200

July 30, 2020 Update: President Donald Trump has suggested that the second round of coronavirus stimulus checks could be more than $1,200. Both Republicans and Democrats have proposed a second round of $1,200 coronavirus stimulus checks.

Trump told KMID-TV in Texas on Wednesday he wants the next stimulus package to be “very generous” and that the second round of coronavirus stimulus checks “may go higher than” $1,200. He said he wants to see the second check be “very high because I love the people.”

The president didn’t say how much he wants the second round of checks to be. According to NBC News, earlier in the day while leaving the White House, Trump said his biggest priorities for the next stimulus package are a second round of coronavirus stimulus checks and a moratorium on evictions.

He added that Congress can handle the rest of the issues “later,” noting that Democrats and Republicans are “so far apart” on other major issues. Both sides indicated on Wednesday that they hadn’t made any progress on striking a deal for the next coronavirus stimulus package.

Lawmakers are on a tight timeline to get something passed. The House leaves for its month-long August recess in a matter of days, and the Senate hasn’t even passed anything for the House to vote on yet.

Why families may receive more in second coronavirus stimulus check

July 29, 2020 Update: Under the HEALS Act, the second round of coronavirus stimulus checks could be larger than the first round of checks for many families. A key difference between the CARES Act, which sent the first round of checks, and the HEALS Act, is the fact that dependents of any age will be eligible for the extra $500.

The CARES Act capped the age of dependents at 17, which meant those age 18 and older did not receive the extra $500 in the family’s coronavirus stimulus check. That excluded older high school students, college students and other adult dependents from receiving $500 each.

Aside from the dependent payment, the coronavirus stimulus check provisions under the HEALS Act and CARES Act are identical. Individuals earning up to $75,000 will receive $1,200, while couples earning up to $150,000 will receive $2,400. The payments phase out after those levels and end at $99,000 for individuals and $198,000 for couples.

HEALS Act revealed with more coronavirus stimulus checks

July 28, 2020 Update: It seems more and more likely that there will be checks similar to those in the first round. However, do not get too excited even if it becomes official. The IRS is allegedly still working out glitch details, so you may have to wait even if the bill is passed soon!

Senate Leader Mitch McConnell revealed the HEALS Act on Monday, which includes a second round of coronavirus stimulus checks, among other provisions. The Health, Economic Assistance, Liability Protection and Schools Act comes with a $1 trillion price tag.

In addition to a second round of coronavirus stimulus checks, the bill includes an extra $200 in weekly unemployment benefits, which is a decrease from the $600 that was offered in the CARES Act. The bill also includes additional funding for schools.

How much money you will get

The second round of coronavirus stimulus checks under the HEALS Act is very similar to the first round under the CARES Act. Individuals earning up to $75,000 per year will receive $1,200, while couples earning up to $150,000 will receive $2,400.

The payments phase out after those levels, ending at $99,000 for individuals and $198,000 for couples. The coronavirus stimulus checks also include $500 per dependent of any age, which is a change from the first round of checks. The first round excluded dependents over the age of 17.

Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer and House Speaker Nancy Pelosi have already said the HEALS Act does not include what’s needed for the economy, such as hazard pay for essential workers. It also doesn’t address the eviction crisis ir provide more funds for food stamps.

GOP to unveil proposal with coronavirus stimulus checks today

July 27, 2020 Update: Senate Republicans are expected to reveal their full coronavirus stimulus package today, but negotiations are far from over. Sen. Lindsey Graham told Fox News over the weekend that half of Republicans are going to vote against the package, illustrating the barriers that still must be overcome before it becomes law.

A second round of coronavirus stimulus checks is expected to receive bipartisan support. Since Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell is introducing the package in multiple pieces, it is possible that the checks could be passed even if the other provisions he wants to see don’t pass both houses of Congress.

After Republicans in the Senate reveal their proposal, they will then start negotiating with Senate Democrats. They are on a tight timeline as the House of Representatives leaves for its August recess at the end of the week.

If anything is going to be passed, it must pass at least the House before the end of the week. The Senate leaves for its August recess at the end of next week, so it will have time to negotiate on any revisions made by the House of Representatives.

The big question now is whether bipartisan bickering and infighting in the GOP keeps a second round of coronavirus checks and other provisions from being passed.

Coronavirus Stimlus Checks Are Vital For Economic Growth

July 25, 2020 Update: The US consumer is responsible for 70% of American gross domestic produce. This is why the stimulus check debate is so vital for the US economy. Especially, with business spending out, US consumers are even more vital for economic growth. If the average American does not have some extra money to spend they could take down the whole economy with them.

More and more details about the second round of coronavirus stimulus checks are coming out. We heard that the GOP’s version of the next stimulus package does indeed include more direct payments, but the amount of those payments and other details about eligibility were not released immediately.

June 24th Coverage

Now we know that the GOP’s proposal for a second round of coronavirus stimulus checks is the same as the first round. The bill calls for $1,200 checks to be sent to individuals earning up to $75,000 and couples earning up to $150,000. After those levels, the payments start to phase out, presumably until the $99,000 income level for individuals and $198,000 for couples. That makes the second round of coronavirus stimulus checks the same as the first round.

Confirmation that the second round of coronavirus stimulus checks will be the same as the first round came from Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin. He told reporters on Thursday that their proposal “is the exact same provision as last time,” according to Bloomberg.

Update on coronavirus stimulus checks expected today

July 23, 2020 Update:The GOP are continuing to bicker over the details of the Coronavirus stimulus checks package. It appears everyone wants a wide stimulus program, but the devil is in the details. One of the big debates is about unemployment. While not the same as the checks, the two are closely tied together. The Democrats want unemployment to continue, while the GOP believes it is boosting unemployment.

Republican lawmakers say they have reached an agreement on the next coronavirus stimulus package. They expect to reveal the stimulus bill today after three full days of negotiations.

Senate Health Chairman Lamar Alexander said the agreement reflects the GOP’s priorities, which are “back to school, back to child care, back to work.” The stimulus bill includes $105 billion in funding for schools and billions of dollars for COVID-19 testing.

As expected, the bill comes with a price tag of $1 trillion. It includes a second round of coronavirus stimulus checks for families and individuals, liability protections, more forgivable loans under the Paycheck Protection Program, and incentives for businesses to retain and hire employees.

According to CNN, Sen. Roy Blunt told reporters that Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell plans to reveal the package today in pieces based on jurisdiction rather than as a single bill. That will bring the beginning of negotiations with Democrats.

GOP bickering may delay coronavirus stimulus checks

Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell confirmed that a second round of IRS Coronavirus stimulus checks and payments will be included in the legislation he writes. However, it’s far from a done deal. Divisions among Republicans and the White House mean there is still much more negotiating to do before anything will be ready to go to Democrats for discussion.

Get The Full Series in PDF

Get the entire 10-part series on Charlie Munger in PDF. Save it to your desktop, read it on your tablet, or email to your colleagues.

Q2 2020 hedge fund letters, conferences and more

McConnell said Senate Republicans in general support a second round of coronavirus stimulus checks. He made the remark following a closed-door meeting on Tuesday.

It was the first time McConnell confirmed that Republicans in the Senate will officially support sending a second round of IRS stimulus payments. He said they want another round of IRS stimulus payments "to help American families keep driving our national comeback."

Before Tuesday's remark, Republicans had debated among themselves whether more stimulus checks were necessary due to other priorities. McConnell's remark is important because it indicates that Senate Republicans have joined Democrats and President Donald Trump in supporting a second round of coronavirus stimulus checks.

Income cap?

Although a major milestone has now been passed with Republicans finally on board with another round IRS stimulus payments, the details remain unclear. McConnell previously said he thought Americans earning less than $40,000 a year have been hit the hardest by the pandemic.

Thus, it was widely speculated that the income cap for the second round of coronavirus stimulus checks would be set at $40,000. However, after his remark on Tuesday, he offered no further details about eligibility for the second round of checks.

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi previously said she thought people earning more than $40,000 probably need help as well, so Democrats may want the income cap to be set higher. The question will be what Republicans come up with as a starting point for negotiations with the Democrats.

Republicans want to keep the next stimulus package at a $1 trillion price tag. A couple of ways to do that would be to tighten eligibility for the second coronavirus stimulus check and to reduce the amount of it.

Republicans split over next coronavirus stimulus package

McConnell's comment about a second round of IRS Coronavirus stimulus checks payments indicates that at least one provision may have been agreed to. However, despite his comment, many Republicans may not actually support more coronavirus stimulus checks.

News reports indicate that several Republicans are speaking out against the bill as it's taking shape under McConnell's leadership. That means there may not actually be as much widespread support among Republicans for a second round of IRS stimulus checks as what is being reported.

CNN and The New York Times both report that the divisions within the GOP have gotten to extreme levels following Tuesday's close-door meeting. The meeting was aimed at negotiating provisions to include in the next stimulus package.

However, it devolved into a venting session in which key members of the GOP talked about what should and shouldn't be in the package. CNN quotes McConnell as saying that the proposal he is working "enjoys fairly significant support among Republican senators" and adding but "not everyone."

In a floor speech before the meeting, he listed the provisions he expects to include in the Republican plan. Those provisions include $105 billion in funding for schools, more targeted funding for forgivable small business loans, a second round of IRS stimulus payments, and liability protections for schools, businesses, healthcare workers and hospitals.

Negotiations delayed by divisions

While many Republicans are rallying behind the proposal, many provisions are still being discussed with the White House. One area of hot debate is a payroll tax cut, which Trump has said must be included in the package, or he might think about not signing it.

At Tuesday's meeting, many senators reportedly spoke up against the idea of a payroll tax cut. Some even questioned whether another major spending package is necessary as they expressed concern about the federal deficit and how much has already been spent to deal with the pandemic.

Sen. Ted Cruz told reporters that based on where the proposal stood after the meeting, he was "not only a no," but a "hell no." Sen. Rand Paul also said he doesn't support the bill as it stands.

Negotiations on the package were supposed to start in earnest this week, but the divisions within the GOP have significantly delayed them. Republicans still plan to reveal their package this week, but they are swiftly running out of time.

Coronavirus stimulus checks and the broader economy

Both houses of Congress will have to pass the bill by the end of next week. The longer Republicans take to come up with a starting point, the less likely Congress will be able to get something passed before the August recess. Negotiations with the Democrats are likely to be at least as difficult as the discussions among Republicans.

The August recess isn't the only deadline lawmakers are up against. The extra $600 in weekly unemployment benefits also runs out at the end of the month, and millions of Americans remain out of work.

Democrats want to extend the extra $600 in benefits, but Republicans will likely seek to decrease the amount of extra benefits. However, given the division over other provisions in the bill, the GOP may not have even gotten to discussing unemployment yet, which is likely to be a key sticking point with Democrats.

The New York Times reports that top Republican officials privately said the negotiations are likely to stretch into August, which will leave millions of Americans without extra help as the pandemic continues to rage.

The post No coronavirus stimulus checks if no deal by Friday appeared first on ValueWalk.

Read More

Continue Reading

Government

Soft, living materials made with algae glow under stress

A team of researchers led by the University of California San Diego has developed soft yet durable materials that glow in response to mechanical stress,…

Published

on

A team of researchers led by the University of California San Diego has developed soft yet durable materials that glow in response to mechanical stress, such as compression, stretching or twisting. The materials derive their luminescence from single-celled algae known as dinoflagellates.

Credit: UC San Diego Jacobs School of Engineering

A team of researchers led by the University of California San Diego has developed soft yet durable materials that glow in response to mechanical stress, such as compression, stretching or twisting. The materials derive their luminescence from single-celled algae known as dinoflagellates.

The work, inspired by the bioluminescent waves observed during red tide events at San Diego’s beaches, was published Oct. 20 in Science Advances.

“An exciting feature of these materials is their inherent simplicity—they need no electronics, no external power source,” said study senior author Shengqiang Cai, a professor of mechanical and aerospace engineering at the UC San Diego Jacobs School of Engineering. “We demonstrate how we can harness the power of nature to directly convert mechanical stimuli into light emission.”

This study was a multi-disciplinary collaboration involving engineers and materials scientists in Cai’s lab, marine biologist Michael Latz at UC San Diego’s Scripps Institution of Oceanography, and physics professor Maziyar Jalaal at University of Amsterdam.

The primary ingredients of the bioluminescent materials are dinoflagellates and a seaweed-based polymer called alginate. These elements were mixed to form a solution, which was then processed with a 3D printer to create a diverse array of shapes, such as grids, spirals, spiderwebs, balls, blocks and pyramid-like structures. The 3D-printed structures were then cured as a final step.

When the materials are subjected to compression, stretching or twisting, the dinoflagellates within them respond by emitting light. This response mimics what happens in the ocean, when dinoflagellates produce flashes of light as part of a predator defense strategy. In tests, the materials glowed when the researchers pressed on them and traced patterns on their surface. The materials were even sensitive enough to glow under the weight of a foam ball rolling on their surface.

The greater the applied stress, the brighter the glow. The researchers were able to quantify this behavior and developed a mathematical model that can predict the intensity of the glow based on the magnitude of the mechanical stress applied.

The researchers also demonstrated techniques to make these materials resilient in various experimental conditions. To reinforce the materials so that they can bear substantial mechanical loads, a second polymer, poly(ethylene glycol) diacrylate, was added to the original blend. Also, coating the materials with a stretchy rubber-like polymer called Ecoflex provided protection in acidic and basic solutions. With this protective layer, the materials could even be stored in seawater for up to five months without losing their form or bioluminescent properties.

Another beneficial feature of these materials is their minimal maintenance requirements. To keep working, the dinoflagellates within the materials need periodic cycles of light and darkness. During the light phase, they photosynthesize to produce food and energy, which are then used in the dark phase to emit light when mechanical stress is applied. This behavior mirrors the natural processes at play when the dinoflagellates cause bioluminescence in the ocean during red tide events. 

“This current work demonstrates a simple method to combine living organisms with non-living components to fabricate novel materials that are self-sustaining and are sensitive to fundamental mechanical stimuli found in nature,” said study first author Chenghai Li, a mechanical and aerospace engineering Ph.D. candidate in Cai’s lab.

The researchers envision that these materials could potentially be used as mechanical sensors to gauge pressure, strain or stress. Other potential applications include soft robotics and biomedical devices that use light signals to perform treatment or controlled drug release.

However, there is much work to be done before these applications can be realized. The researchers are working on further improving and optimizing the materials.

Paper: “Ultrasensitive and robust mechanoluminescent living composites.” Co-authors include Zijun Wang and Nada F. Qari, UC San Diego; and Nico Schramma, University of Amsterdam.

This work was supported by the U.S. Army Research Office (grant W911NF-20-2-0182).


Read More

Continue Reading

International

Industrial Real Estate and the North American Supply Chain Revolution

Industrial real estate might be one of the strongest-performing property types out there in recent years, but it is far from immune to change. Experts…

Published

on

Industrial real estate might be one of the strongest-performing property types out there in recent years, but it is far from immune to change. During the panel “Industrial Real Estate and the North American Supply Chain Revolution,” held at NAIOP’s CRE.Converge conference in Seattle this week, Chad Griffiths, MBA, SIOR, partner and associate broker at NAI Commercial Real Estate, spoke with Matt Carroll, senior associate at Avison Young, about what’s in store for industrial properties in the coming years.

The background to modern-day industrial real estate is an ongoing dialogue about globalization versus deglobalization as the pandemic fades into the rearview mirror, Carroll said. There are proponents of manufacturing overseas and supporters of manufacturing in North America, as well as a paradigm shift from optimality toward optionality. “Optimality was … ’I want to be as efficient and low in cost as possible,’” he said. “And as we come out of the pandemic era, what you hear a lot of people talking about is having optionality…’If I can’t move all of my manufacturing back to the U.S., I want to least have the option to mitigate my risk by having the presence of manufacturing on this side of the hemisphere.’”

Another transformative force the panelists discussed was a recent rail merger, the acquisition of Kansas City Southern by Canadian Pacific. The merger will result in the first trans-American rail line linking Mexico, the U.S., and Canada, which Carroll described as like a tree with roots in Mexico. Griffiths said developers should consider opportunities for intermodal yards, airports and other industrial properties along the “trunk” of that tree.

“It’s a $30 billion merger. So that wasn’t small change, and I have to think that they did that because they want to capitalize on Mexico becoming a manufacturing powerhouse,” he said.

The panelists discussed other major transformations they expect in the near future, as well. Both agreed that buildings will face a growing need for electric vehicle (EV)-charging infrastructure, and many will struggle to deliver since most warehouses aren’t built with high power demand in mind. “It can actually render some functional obsolescence if these buildings aren’t able to accommodate future use,” Griffiths said. Properties may be able to supplement their power access with on-site solar generation, but some won’t be physically strong enough to support the weight of rooftop solar. An action item for developers now: install sufficient conduit for greater long-term power needs ahead of time, so that capacity is there when it is needed.

During the Q&A session, one audience member mentioned that his company is putting in three times as much power in its properties compared to five years ago.

Beyond just the power component, industrial properties will also need to grapple with where to place EV-charging infrastructure on-site. Where can trucks linger on-site for an hour while charging, without disrupting loading and unloading? “We’re talking about EV-charging courts,” said Mason. “So, you don’t want to necessarily have your trucks just sitting there…instead they’re going to come bring the trailer in, and then you’re going to have them go to a separate place for charging.”

Outside of EVs, another growing power draw to expect is automation. The panelists said drone delivery is getting closer to reality, alongside collaborative robots that support workers in the warehouse.

One possible black swan event that could negatively impact the property type: Automation technology is making 60 to 80-foot warehouse racks possible. While emphasizing high cubic feet with a smaller footprint could help developers provide more efficient logistics space, this could be very disruptive to the market.

Griffiths said this might leave the current stock of 36- to 40-foot warehouse buildings in a tough position. “I think that that could render those buildings, just from a competitive standpoint, less valuable, because now a company has to pay on that square footage,” he said. Carroll added that this might be geographically based, with markets where land is cheap continuing to emphasize lower, larger buildings. “So, my quick thought would be I think it’s going to be geographical. If you go to a place like Indiana where there’s a lot of land to develop, I think the warehouses will remain similar in size as they are now, in terms of ceiling height,” he said.

Industrial real estate has been on fire for a long time, and markets are now starting to see vacancy rates tick up. Meanwhile, consumer preferences changing to favor experiences could result in moderation of demand. As long as people are buying goods, though, there will be a need for warehouses, tall or short, close to our homes.


JLL logo

This post is brought to you by JLL, the social media and conference blog sponsor of NAIOP’s CRE.Converge 2023. Learn more about JLL at www.us.jll.com or www.jll.ca.

Read More

Continue Reading

International

Understanding Carbon Goals and Approaches for Developers

As investors and occupiers look to improve the sustainability of their investments and operations, decarbonizing the built environment is an increasingly…

Published

on

As investors and occupiers look to improve the sustainability of their investments and operations, decarbonizing the built environment is an increasingly important real estate decision.

In a panel at this week’s NAIOP’s CRE.Converge conference, sustainable building professionals explored some of the strategies their firms are using to mitigate carbon emissions across their industrial real estate portfolios. Nate Maniktala, LEED AP BD+C, MBA, a principal at building consultancy BranchPattern, moderated the panel and began by addressing the scope of the need for sustainable building methods.

According to Julia Wattick, AIA, LEED AP ND, Fitwel Ambassador, a senior associate and team lead at BranchPattern, there are two broad types of carbon in buildings: Embodied carbon from the building’s entire lifecycle and operational carbon from building use. “There are actually seven years of operational carbon emissions that typically equal that upfront embodied carbon impact,” she said. Out of that embodied carbon, concrete is the leading emissions culprit, accounting for over 11% of global greenhouse gas emissions.

Real estate businesses feel pressure to address carbon from several main sources. According to Josh Hullum, executive director of construction at Affinius Capital, “It’s understanding the impact from our investors. I think that’s the loudest voice in the room, particularly as you go north to Canadian or European investors. For every dollar received, there’s an element of expectation for more responsible design and development.”

For Jennifer Emrick, LEED AP BD+C, global construction sustainability manager for Prologis, there is occupier as well as government pressure. “We have customers that are also setting their own internal carbon goals, so they’re coming to Prologis and they’re wanting to understand how we can meet these goals,” she said. “And so, we want to be able to work with them, be a partner, have the knowledge and the expertise to let them know what’s the path to get to that goal.”

Emrick also pointed to recent U.S. sustainability regulations such as New York City’s Local Law 97, and others in Denver and California, as encouragement for Prologis to adopt more sustainable construction practices.

According to Wattick, there are five types of building decarbonization efforts, ranked in order from most impactful:

  1. Renovation, the highest-priority impact area since pre-existing buildings have already generated much of their embodied carbon.
  2. Reduce the use of carbon-intensive materials through design.
  3. Reuse existing materials, and design for future reuse.
  4. Replace materials with a high carbon impact with less impactful ones.
  5. Require low-carbon materials for new projects.

The panelists used a range of approaches to achieve these goals. Mass timber was widely suggested as a useful, lower-carbon material, alongside different concrete mixes utilizing fly ash or other Supplementary Cementitious Materials that partially or completely replace Portland cement. Additionally, novel building technologies like Nexii wall panels, which use sand and a binder to replace Portland cement, or Total Integrated Panel Systems (TIPS), which add a foam core to concrete, can be critical for reducing embodied carbon as well.

At Affinius Capital, Hullum pointed to one project where his team installed high-performing insulation, resulting in a slightly higher embodied carbon footprint in return for enhanced operational performance. “It’s not all about driving embodied carbon as low as possible at the sacrifice of the long-term utility…you have to holistically ask what’s the best approach,” he said.

Reducing the carbon footprint of buildings isn’t an easy task, but it can be accomplished with the right planning ahead of time. “The whole team is going to have to collaborate and work together, which they do already but inherently it’s going to be more difficult when you’re doing something new like the TIPS panels,” Emrick said.

In return, property teams may be able to realize drastically improved building carbon performance, while seeing similar or only slightly higher development costs. The broader sustainability impact of properties is now considered alongside financial metrics, Hullum added.

Read more in a two-part pre-conference series on this topic:


JLL logo

This post is brought to you by JLL, the social media and conference blog sponsor of NAIOP’s CRE.Converge 2023. Learn more about JLL at www.us.jll.com or www.jll.ca.

Read More

Continue Reading

Trending