Connect with us

Near-Term Price Action in the Context of the Larger Dollar Cycle

Near-Term Price Action in the Context of the Larger Dollar Cycle

Published

on


The epicenter of the tremendous financial earthquake in 2008 and 2009 was in the US. There are many critics of the actions of the US (government and central bank), but it responded relatively early and relatively aggressively.   The net result was FIFO as in first in, first out.  It was that divergence fueled the dollar's recovery from bear market lows that saw the euro trade above $1.60, sterling through $2.11, and the Canadian and Australian dollar to around $1.11.

The third significant dollar rally since the end of Bretton Woods was driven by the subsequent divergence.  Later, the US policy mix of tighter monetary policy and looser fiscal policy provided additional fuel.  For around nine months, the case this rally is ending has grown more salient.  Broadly speaking, the policy mix is less supportive:  Interest rate differentials have been moving against the dollar since November 2018, something associated with the last stage of a major bull market. The dollar is very rich on a valuation basis, for which the OECD's measure of purchasing power parity offers a reasonable proxy.

A massive convergence has taken place as the market is rapidly adjusting expectations that the fed funds rate will return to the zero-bound.  The US 2-year premium over Germany has fallen from about 220 bp at the end of last year to almost 130 bp now. It peaked over a year ago near 355 bp.  The relationship with the dollar does not appear linear, but cyclical.

This pattern is repeated elsewhere. Consider the UK.  The US premium peaked in November 2018 near 215 bp and by the end of last year had fallen to almost 100 bp.  It finished last week near 35 bp.  Consider Japan. The US premium is near 70 bp on top of a two-year JGB.  It began the year more than 100 bp higher.  When the premium peaked in late 2018, it was over 300 bp. 

The trigger or duration of a large cycle is beyond the pale of such broad strokes.  The near-term drivers often include momentum, positioning, and other technical indicators.  It is to that we turn.

Dollar Index: The 2.2% drop last week, coupled with the 1.1% drop the previous week, is the biggest back-to-back decline since the first half of February 2016.  It finished the week below 96.00 for the first time since early last year.  The momentum indicators are reflecting the strong downside momentum, but the Slow Stochastic is leveling off.  The abrupt adjustment is reflected in the fact that the Dollar Index closed below its lower Bollinger Band for four of last week's five sessions, including Friday. This phase of the rally began in February 2018 when the Dollar Index was near 88.25.  It peaked in early last month around 99.90, stopping just shy of 100.  The two-week drop has nearly met the (38.2%) retracement objective a little below 95.50.  Initial resistance is seen in the 96.50-96.70 band.

Euro: The single currency has risen against the dollar in eight of the last 10 sessions.  It reached its highs around $1.1350 after the US reported better than expected jobs data.  Pullbacks on Tuesday and Wednesday found new bids just below $1.1100 suggest that sentiment has shifted from sell rallies to buy dips.  The euro is at its highest level since last July, and also closed several times last week above its upper Bollinger Band.  The technical indicators are getting stretched.  Initial support now is pegged around $1.1220-$1.1240.  The next technical target is near $1.1450.   For the first time in seven weeks, speculators in the futures market covered previously sold positions.  The 33k contract reduction in gross short positions for the week ending March 3 was the largest since June 2010.  Still, with a gross short position of 238k contracts (each one has a notional value of 100k euros), there is plenty of fodder for additional short-covering.   The speculative longs have not begun building.  The gross long position stands at a 151.9k contract as of March 3.  It has fallen for the past two reporting periods.  It is below the 13-week, 26-week, and 52-week moving averages.

Japanese Yen:  Since the high on February 20 above JPY112.20, the dollar has depreciated by roughly 6.5% against the yen, reaching JPY105 before the weekend.  BOJ officials will grow increasingly concerned if the dollar spends much time below there as the JPY100-level represents a critical area.  The lower Bollinger Band is found just below JPY106, and the dollar has settled below it for the past two sessions.  The MACD shows strong downside momentum while the Slow Stochastic is beginning to turn.  A move JPY106.40-JP106.50 would lift the technical tone.  The speculative yen bulls in the futures market have liquidated about 15% of their gross long exposure over the past two reporting periods. Commercials in the futures market also trimmed their long yen position in the week ending March 3 (~24k contracts, each for JPY12.5 mln). Speculators covered almost 16% (~17.3k contracts) of their gross short position, while commercials barely touched theirs.

British Pound:  Sterling will take a four-day rally into next week.  It settled on its best level of the session ahead of the weekend near $1.3050, which is the highest close since the end of January.  Its apparent strength may be best conceived as dollar weakness.   Sterling has fallen for three consecutive weeks against the euro and is around its lowest level since last October (GBP0.8660).  Both the MACD and Slow Stochastic are turning up.  Although sterling under-performed last week (1.75% gain put in in seventh place among the top 10 major currencies), technically, it is in good shape to play catch-up.   There looks to be potential into the $1.3200-$1.3250 area. 

Canadian Dollar:  The Bank of Canada surprised most observers with a 50 bp rate cut, and the Canadian dollar is the only major currency that fell against the US dollar last week (-0.15%).  It has fallen in eight of the past 10 sessions.  The three forces that seem to explain the bulk of the Canadian dollar's movement worked against it last week.  Its premium over the US narrowed (from ~24 bp to ~18).  Oil prices have fallen by about 23% over the past two weeks, and the CRB Index is off almost 11%.  The MACD is edging higher, while the bearish divergence in the Slow Stochastic continues to unfold.  A marginal new US dollar high (above CAD1.3465) may be possible, but that might be the last gasp before correcting lower. 

Australian Dollar:  The Aussie was resilient after the RBA kicked off the monthly central bank meetings with a 25 bp rate cut.  New highs since February 20 were set before the weekend (~$0.6660).  It finished the week above its 20-day moving average for the first time in two months. The MACD and Slow Stochastic are moving higher.  There is near-term technical potential in the $0.6700-$0.6750 area. Still, if a larger upside correction has begun, the $0.6800-$0.6830  band offers a reasonable target (houses the 61.8% retracement of this year's decline and the 200-day moving average).

Mexican Peso: Risk aversion continues to punish the peso.  The US dollar has soared by more than 8% against the peso in the three-week slide.  The dollar reached MXN20.38 ahead of the weekend, its best level since December 2018.  The MXN20.50-MXN20.65 area is the next important chart resistance.  However, the technicals warn against chasing the dollar higher.  The MACDs are stretched, and the Slow Stochastic has failed to confirm the dollar's recent highs and has turned lower.  The dollar finished the week above its upper Bollinger Band (~MXN20.23). Look for a reversal pattern to confirm a high is in place.

Chinese Yuan:  The US dollar has returned to levels against the yuan that were seen before the Lunar New Year holiday and confirmation of the novel coronavirus.  It spent the better part of the last three sessions below the CNY6.95 level that had marked the floor of the previous range.  It is difficult to know what officials want.  A weaker yuan seems to be more consistent with its monetary stance.  The next important support for the dollar is around CNY6.90.

Gold: New seven-year highs were set at the end of last week a little above $1692.  Last week's 5.5% rally was the biggest sine 2016.  A move above $1700 will target $1750 and then $1800.  The technical indicators are constructive.   A break of $1640 would weaken the technical tone, and a move below $1615-$1625 would warn of a near-term top may be in place.

Oil: The breakdown of the OPEC+ talks, and in particular, the falling out of the Saudi-Russian marriage of convenience at the end of last week sent oil prices reeling.  The April light sweet crude oil tanked 10% ahead of the weekend, sliding to almost $41.  It has plunged nearly 23% in the past two weeks.  The inability to coordinate the producers, which will boost output, is hitting at the same time that world demand has been weakened by the coronavirus and the disruption of commerce, trade, tourism.  The supply and demand shocks point to lower prices, and a break of $40 may spur a move toward $30.  Separate from the coronavirus, the precipitous drop in oil prices will have knock-on effects to weigh on measured headline inflation and inflation expectations.  It will likely pressure the highly-leveraged shale producers in the US, which have been an important component of capex.  

US Rates: After a series of mostly better than expected data, including the February employment report, the Atlanta Fed's GDP tracker sees the US growth accelerating to 3.1% here in Q1.  Even then, the March fed funds futures and the index of overnight swaps indicate investors are pricing in more than another 50 bp cut on March 18 after the FOMC meeting. Assuming that the effective average fed funds rate averages 1.09% until the end of the FOMC meeting and it delivers a 50 bp cut, and for the last 13 days of the month, the fed funds average 59 bp, fair value for the March contract is about 93 bp.  The contract finished last week at 0.8775%, which includes the nearly nine basis point decline despite those job figures.  The implied yield of the December fed funds futures contract fell 45 bp last week.  This adjustment to overnight rate expectations continues to drive the longer-dated yields.  The two-year yield fell 40 bp last week, while the 10-year yield dropped 38 bp.  

S&P 500:  One has to look hard through the news, and the gut-wrenching volatility (which so many had explained was structurally depressed by the expansion of central bank balance sheets) to recognize that the S&P 600 ended last week with a 0.6% gain and the Dow Jones Industrials rose about1.8%.  The low seen the previous week, near 2855 in the S&Ps, was revisited ahead of the weekend with a test on 2900 and then rallying nearly 3% in the last hour of trading to set a new session high.  However, that late bounce failed to close the gap created by the sharply lower opening.  That gap is the first hurdle and is found between roughly 2986 and 3000.  The MACD is stretched but shows no immediate sign of turning higher, while the Slow Stochastic has already crossed up.   The bounce (to ~3125) in the first part of last week retraced half of its losses.  If that was the first leg of the correction (A), and subsequent losses (B) are part of a three-part correction that some chartists often see, then the next leg up (C) could target 3185-3250.  



Disclaimer



Read More

Continue Reading

Uncategorized

February Employment Situation

By Paul Gomme and Peter Rupert The establishment data from the BLS showed a 275,000 increase in payroll employment for February, outpacing the 230,000…

Published

on

By Paul Gomme and Peter Rupert

The establishment data from the BLS showed a 275,000 increase in payroll employment for February, outpacing the 230,000 average over the previous 12 months. The payroll data for January and December were revised down by a total of 167,000. The private sector added 223,000 new jobs, the largest gain since May of last year.

Temporary help services employment continues a steep decline after a sharp post-pandemic rise.

Average hours of work increased from 34.2 to 34.3. The increase, along with the 223,000 private employment increase led to a hefty increase in total hours of 5.6% at an annualized rate, also the largest increase since May of last year.

The establishment report, once again, beat “expectations;” the WSJ survey of economists was 198,000. Other than the downward revisions, mentioned above, another bit of negative news was a smallish increase in wage growth, from $34.52 to $34.57.

The household survey shows that the labor force increased 150,000, a drop in employment of 184,000 and an increase in the number of unemployed persons of 334,000. The labor force participation rate held steady at 62.5, the employment to population ratio decreased from 60.2 to 60.1 and the unemployment rate increased from 3.66 to 3.86. Remember that the unemployment rate is the number of unemployed relative to the labor force (the number employed plus the number unemployed). Consequently, the unemployment rate can go up if the number of unemployed rises holding fixed the labor force, or if the labor force shrinks holding the number unemployed unchanged. An increase in the unemployment rate is not necessarily a bad thing: it may reflect a strong labor market drawing “marginally attached” individuals from outside the labor force. Indeed, there was a 96,000 decline in those workers.

Earlier in the week, the BLS announced JOLTS (Job Openings and Labor Turnover Survey) data for January. There isn’t much to report here as the job openings changed little at 8.9 million, the number of hires and total separations were little changed at 5.7 million and 5.3 million, respectively.

As has been the case for the last couple of years, the number of job openings remains higher than the number of unemployed persons.

Also earlier in the week the BLS announced that productivity increased 3.2% in the 4th quarter with output rising 3.5% and hours of work rising 0.3%.

The bottom line is that the labor market continues its surprisingly (to some) strong performance, once again proving stronger than many had expected. This strength makes it difficult to justify any interest rate cuts soon, particularly given the recent inflation spike.

Read More

Continue Reading

Spread & Containment

Another beloved brewery files Chapter 11 bankruptcy

The beer industry has been devastated by covid, changing tastes, and maybe fallout from the Bud Light scandal.

Published

on

Before the covid pandemic, craft beer was having a moment. Most cities had multiple breweries and taprooms with some having so many that people put together the brewery version of a pub crawl.

It was a period where beer snobbery ruled the day and it was not uncommon to hear bar patrons discuss the makeup of the beer the beer they were drinking. This boom period always seemed destined for failure, or at least a retraction as many markets seemed to have more craft breweries than they could support.

Related: Fast-food chain closes more stores after Chapter 11 bankruptcy

The pandemic, however, hastened that downfall. Many of these local and regional craft breweries counted on in-person sales to drive their business. 

And while many had local and regional distribution, selling through a third party comes with much lower margins. Direct sales drove their business and the pandemic forced many breweries to shut down their taprooms during the period where social distancing rules were in effect.

During those months the breweries still had rent and employees to pay while little money was coming in. That led to a number of popular beermakers including San Francisco's nationally-known Anchor Brewing as well as many regional favorites including Chicago’s Metropolitan Brewing, New Jersey’s Flying Fish, Denver’s Joyride Brewing, Tampa’s Zydeco Brew Werks, and Cleveland’s Terrestrial Brewing filing bankruptcy.

Some of these brands hope to survive, but others, including Anchor Brewing, fell into Chapter 7 liquidation. Now, another domino has fallen as a popular regional brewery has filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection.

Overall beer sales have fallen.

Image source: Shutterstock

Covid is not the only reason for brewery bankruptcies

While covid deserves some of the blame for brewery failures, it's not the only reason why so many have filed for bankruptcy protection. Overall beer sales have fallen driven by younger people embracing non-alcoholic cocktails, and the rise in popularity of non-beer alcoholic offerings,

Beer sales have fallen to their lowest levels since 1999 and some industry analysts

"Sales declined by more than 5% in the first nine months of the year, dragged down not only by the backlash and boycotts against Anheuser-Busch-owned Bud Light but the changing habits of younger drinkers," according to data from Beer Marketer’s Insights published by the New York Post.

Bud Light parent Anheuser Busch InBev (BUD) faced massive boycotts after it partnered with transgender social media influencer Dylan Mulvaney. It was a very small partnership but it led to a right-wing backlash spurred on by Kid Rock, who posted a video on social media where he chastised the company before shooting up cases of Bud Light with an automatic weapon.

Another brewery files Chapter 11 bankruptcy

Gizmo Brew Works, which does business under the name Roth Brewing Company LLC, filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection on March 8. In its filing, the company checked the box that indicates that its debts are less than $7.5 million and it chooses to proceed under Subchapter V of Chapter 11. 

"Both small business and subchapter V cases are treated differently than a traditional chapter 11 case primarily due to accelerated deadlines and the speed with which the plan is confirmed," USCourts.gov explained. 

Roth Brewing/Gizmo Brew Works shared that it has 50-99 creditors and assets $100,000 and $500,000. The filing noted that the company does expect to have funds available for unsecured creditors. 

The popular brewery operates three taprooms and sells its beer to go at those locations.

"Join us at Gizmo Brew Works Craft Brewery and Taprooms located in Raleigh, Durham, and Chapel Hill, North Carolina. Find us for entertainment, live music, food trucks, beer specials, and most importantly, great-tasting craft beer by Gizmo Brew Works," the company shared on its website.

The company estimates that it has between $1 and $10 million in liabilities (a broad range as the bankruptcy form does not provide a space to be more specific).

Gizmo Brew Works/Roth Brewing did not share a reorganization or funding plan in its bankruptcy filing. An email request for comment sent through the company's contact page was not immediately returned.

 

Read More

Continue Reading

Government

Walmart joins Costco in sharing key pricing news

The massive retailers have both shared information that some retailers keep very close to the vest.

Published

on

As we head toward a presidential election, the presumed candidates for both parties will look for issues that rally undecided voters. 

The economy will be a key issue, with Democrats pointing to job creation and lowering prices while Republicans will cite the layoffs at Big Tech companies, high housing prices, and of course, sticky inflation.

The covid pandemic created a perfect storm for inflation and higher prices. It became harder to get many items because people getting sick slowed down, or even stopped, production at some factories.

Related: Popular mall retailer shuts down abruptly after bankruptcy filing

It was also a period where demand increased while shipping, trucking and delivery systems were all strained or thrown out of whack. The combination led to product shortages and higher prices.

You might have gone to the grocery store and not been able to buy your favorite paper towel brand or find toilet paper at all. That happened partly because of the supply chain and partly due to increased demand, but at the end of the day, it led to higher prices, which some consumers blamed on President Joe Biden's administration.

Biden, of course, was blamed for the price increases, but as inflation has dropped and grocery prices have fallen, few companies have been up front about it. That's probably not a political choice in most cases. Instead, some companies have chosen to lower prices more slowly than they raised them.

However, two major retailers, Walmart (WMT) and Costco, have been very honest about inflation. Walmart Chief Executive Doug McMillon's most recent comments validate what Biden's administration has been saying about the state of the economy. And they contrast with the economic picture being painted by Republicans who support their presumptive nominee, Donald Trump.

Walmart has seen inflation drop in many key areas.

Image source: Joe Raedle/Getty Images

Walmart sees lower prices

McMillon does not talk about lower prices to make a political statement. He's communicating with customers and potential customers through the analysts who cover the company's quarterly-earnings calls.

During Walmart's fiscal-fourth-quarter-earnings call, McMillon was clear that prices are going down.

"I'm excited about the omnichannel net promoter score trends the team is driving. Across countries, we continue to see a customer that's resilient but looking for value. As always, we're working hard to deliver that for them, including through our rollbacks on food pricing in Walmart U.S. Those were up significantly in Q4 versus last year, following a big increase in Q3," he said.

He was specific about where the chain has seen prices go down.

"Our general merchandise prices are lower than a year ago and even two years ago in some categories, which means our customers are finding value in areas like apparel and hard lines," he said. "In food, prices are lower than a year ago in places like eggs, apples, and deli snacks, but higher in other places like asparagus and blackberries."

McMillon said that in other areas prices were still up but have been falling.

"Dry grocery and consumables categories like paper goods and cleaning supplies are up mid-single digits versus last year and high teens versus two years ago. Private-brand penetration is up in many of the countries where we operate, including the United States," he said.

Costco sees almost no inflation impact

McMillon avoided the word inflation in his comments. Costco  (COST)  Chief Financial Officer Richard Galanti, who steps down on March 15, has been very transparent on the topic.

The CFO commented on inflation during his company's fiscal-first-quarter-earnings call.

"Most recently, in the last fourth-quarter discussion, we had estimated that year-over-year inflation was in the 1% to 2% range. Our estimate for the quarter just ended, that inflation was in the 0% to 1% range," he said.

Galanti made clear that inflation (and even deflation) varied by category.

"A bigger deflation in some big and bulky items like furniture sets due to lower freight costs year over year, as well as on things like domestics, bulky lower-priced items, again, where the freight cost is significant. Some deflationary items were as much as 20% to 30% and, again, mostly freight-related," he added.

Read More

Continue Reading

Trending