Government
Nancy Pelosi Claims Dems Will Win Big – Apologizes For Saying Trump’s Name Out Loud On Colbert Show
Nancy Pelosi Claims Dems Will Win Big – Apologizes For Saying Trump’s Name Out Loud On Colbert Show
Best known for her erratic hot takes,…

Best known for her erratic hot takes, covid mandate hypocrisy and her drunk driving husband that uses advanced access to government information to make millions on the stock market, Nancy Pelosi is more of a caricature of a politician than an actual person with honest observations. It's hard to say if everything she says is scripted or if she is just rambling off the cuff at times.
Her last infamous headline grabbing argument appeared in March when she stated that more government spending actually “reduces the national debt” and does not cause inflation. Everything about this claim is wrong, but one has to consider that Pelosi, Biden and other political spokespeople rarely say anything without a team of advisers composing their thoughts for them. It is likely that such gaffs occur when the puppet misinterprets the teleprompter.
The California Congresswoman was recently a guest on the Stephen Colbert Show, which has become a central hub for pro-establishment propaganda (it isn't all that surprising that leftists are using clowns to deliver their ideological messaging). Colbert has also been notably obsessed in the extreme when it comes to Donald Trump, long after the election of 2020, with a constant barrage of attacks ever since.
Pelosi predicted a strong win for democrats in the November mid-term elections. “I believe that we will hold the House, and we will hold the House by winning more seats,” Pelosi told Colbert on Oct. 3 to whoops and applause.
“We won the 40 seats, then we lost some when Trump was on the ballot,” she continued. “We lost some of the Trump districts, but we held enough seats to hold the House with him on the ballot. He’s not on the ballot now.”
Pelosi then apologized for saying Trump's name out loud – As if speaking of Voldemort from Harry Potter. “Oh, did I say his name? I didn’t mean to...Perhaps you could bleep that out."
Whether one loves Trump, hates Trump or is indifferent, it is undeniable that the US has plunged into a world of social instability and economic decline under the supervision of Joe Biden and the democrats. Some people may bring up the concept of the “false left/right paradigm,” and Neo-cons within the GOP are still a big problem, but the fact remains that red states were mostly mandate free during the covid pandemic hype, they stood in opposition to Biden's unconstitutional executive orders and their economies are faring far better overall in the aftermath of the lockdowns. There is a distinct separation in terms of conservatives and leftists and the pandemic event proved it.
Pelosi's home state alone is facing a surge in the homeless population, exploding crime stats as well as a mass exodus of longtime residents seeking to escape the implosion as well as draconian covid restrictions. These are nationwide issues, but they are greatly magnified in blue states where government mismanagement is adding to the chaos. In a list of places that Americans least want to live, democrat controlled states fill the top (excluding Alaska).
With 40 year record inflationary highs, rising gas prices, falling stock markets, falling GDP, falling retail sales, and mass layoffs expected this winter, it's impossible for leftists to sell themselves as viable candidates.
Mainstream analysts suggest that the Supreme Court decision determining that abortions are not constitutionally protected, leaving legal matters to state governments, will create a groundswell of support for democrats and a “silent majority” of voters that will give them a landslide victory in the mid-terms. However, nationwide pro-abortion protests in light of the Supreme Court ruling were small, ineffective and unimpressive. This suggests that there may not be as much national support for abortion as democrats assume.
Polls show that Americans care far more about economic concerns than social concerns like abortion or climate change. One is reminded again of the lead up to the 2016 elections when the left declared victory prematurely while ignoring all the signs of public distrust. Even the hard blue New York City booed Pelosi off stage at the “Global Citizen Music Festival” last month. This is not a good portent for democrats.
International
Nigerian gov supports AI initiatives with $290K in grants
The recently introduced Nigeria Artificial Intelligence Research Scheme is designed to facilitate the widespread utilization of AI to drive economic advancement.
…

The recently introduced Nigeria Artificial Intelligence Research Scheme is designed to facilitate the widespread utilization of AI to drive economic advancement.
The Nigerian Minister of Communications, Innovation and Digital Economy, Dr. Bosun Tijani, revealed on Friday, Oct.13, that the Federal Government intends to grant a sum of $6,444 (5 million naira) each to 45 artificial intelligence (AI) focused startups and researchers. This figure makes a total of $289,980 (225 million naira) being given out for the purpose of AI.
This information was disclosed by the minister in a post on X. The recently introduced Nigeria Artificial Intelligence Research Scheme is designed to facilitate the widespread utilization of Artificial Intelligence to drive economic advancement.
As outlined on the scheme's official website, the focal areas encompass Agriculture, Education and Workforce, Finance, Governance, Healthcare, Utility and Sustainability. To be eligible for the grant, applicants are required to form a consortium, comprising a startup or tech company, a researcher from a Nigerian university, or a foreign researcher, as stated by the Ministry.
To support the mainstreaming of the application of Artificial Intelligence for economic prosperity, we’ve launched the Nigeria Artificial Intelligence Research Scheme to fund 45 consortia of startups and researchers to allow them explore further opportunities to deepen their… pic.twitter.com/CaD5Vqs8Du
— Dr. 'Bosun Tijani (@bosuntijani) October 13, 2023
Applicants should present a research proposal in line with the Federal Ministry of Communications, Innovation and Digital Economy's AI focus areas. Furthermore, they must provide a comprehensive project proposal that highlights the project's potential economic impact in Nigeria.
In addition, a proven track record of excellence in research or entrepreneurship is a requirement. Finally, applicants are expected to publish at least one peer-reviewed article within one year of grant receipt.
In August, the Nigerian government extended an invitation to scientists of Nigerian heritage, as well as globally renowned experts who have worked within the Nigerian market, to collaborate in the formulation of its National Artificial Intelligence Strategy.
Related: China sets stricter rules for training generative AI models
The application period commences on Oct.13, 2023, and concludes on Nov. 15, 2023. All submissions should be made through the specified online platform. The Ministry has indicated that a panel of AI specialists will assess the proposals. Those who make it to the shortlist will receive email notifications and be invited for interviews.
Magazine: ‘AI has killed the industry’: EasyTranslate boss on adapting to change
grants chinaInternational
Escobar: The Geopolitics Of Al-Aqsa Flood
Escobar: The Geopolitics Of Al-Aqsa Flood
Authored by Pepe Escobar via The Cradle,
Global focus just shifted from Ukraine to Palestine. This…

Authored by Pepe Escobar via The Cradle,
Global focus just shifted from Ukraine to Palestine. This new arena of confrontation will ignite further competition between the Atlanticist and Eurasian blocs. These fights are increasingly zero-sum ones; as in Ukraine, only one pole can emerge strengthened and victorious.
Hamas’ Operation Al-Aqsa Flood was meticulously planned. The launch date was conditioned by two triggering factors.
-
First was Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu flaunting his 'New Middle East' map at the UN General Assembly in September, in which he completely erased Palestine and made a mockery of every single UN resolution on the subject.
-
Second are the serial provocations at the holy Al-Aqsa Mosque in Jerusalem, including the straw that broke the camel’s back: two days before Al-Aqsa Flood, on 5 October, at least 800 Israeli settlers launched an assault around the mosque, beating pilgrims, destroying Palestinian shops, all under the observation of Israeli security forces.
Everyone with a functioning brain knows Al-Aqsa is a definitive red line, not just for Palestinians, but for the entire Arab and Muslim worlds.
It gets worse. The Israelis have now invoked the rhetoric of a “Pearl Harbor.” This is as threatening as it gets. The original Pearl Harbor was the American excuse to enter a world war and nuke Japan, and this “Pearl Harbor” may be Tel Aviv’s justification to launch a Gaza genocide.
Sections of the west applauding the upcoming ethnic cleansing – including Zionists posing as “analysts” saying out loud that the “population transfers” that began in 1948 “must be completed” – believe that with massive weaponry and massive media coverage, they can turn things around in short shrift, annihilate the Palestinian resistance, and leave Hamas allies like Hezbollah and Iran weakened.
Their Ukraine Project has sputtered, leaving not just egg on powerful faces, but entire European economies in ruin.
Yet as one door closes, another one opens: Jump from ally Ukraine to ally Israel, and hone your sights on adversary Iran instead of adversary Russia.
There are other good reasons to go all guns blazing.
A peaceful West Asia means Syria reconstruction – in which China is now officially involved; active redevelopment for Iraq and Lebanon; Iran and Saudi Arabia as part of BRICS 11; the Russia-China strategic partnership fully respected and interacting with all regional players, including key US allies in the Persian Gulf.
Incompetence. Willful strategy. Or both.
That brings us to the cost of launching this new “war on terror.” The propaganda is in full swing. For Netanyahu in Tel Aviv, Hamas is ISIS. For Volodymyr Zelensky in Kiev, Hamas is Russia. Over one October weekend, the war in Ukraine was completely forgotten by western mainstream media. Brandenburg Gate, the Eiffel tower, the Brazilian Senate are all Israeli now.
Egyptian intel claims it warned Tel Aviv about an imminent attack from Hamas. The Israelis chose to ignore it, as they did the Hamas training drills they observed in the weeks prior, smug in their superior knowledge that Palestinians would never have the audacity to launch a liberation operation.
Whatever happens next, Al-Aqsa Flood has already, irretrievably, shattered the hefty pop mythology around the invincibility of Tsahal, Mossad, Shin Bet, Merkava tank, Iron Dome, and the Israel Defense Forces.
Even as it ditched electronic communications, Hamas profited from the glaring collapse of Israel’s multi-billion-dollar electronic systems monitoring the most surveilled border on the planet.
Cheap Palestinian drones hit multiple sensor towers, facilitated the advance of a paragliding infantry, and cleared the way for T-shirted, AK-47-wielding assault teams to inflict breaks in the wall and cross a border that even stray cats dared not.
Israel, inevitably, turned to battering the Gaza Strip, an encircled cage of 365 square kilometers packed with 2.3 million people. The indiscriminate bombing of refugee camps, schools, civilian apartment blocks, mosques, and slums has begun. Palestinians have no navy, no air force, no artillery units, no armored fighting vehicles, and no professional army. They have little to no high-tech surveillance access, while Israel can call up NATO data if they want it.
Israeli Defense Minister Yoav Gallant proclaimed “a complete siege on the Gaza Strip. There will be no electricity, no food, no fuel, everything is closed. We are fighting human animals and we will act accordingly.”
The Israelis can merrily engage in collective punishment because, with three guaranteed UNSC vetoes in their back pocket, they know they can get away with it.
It doesn’t matter that Haaretz, Israel’s most respected newspaper, straight out concedes that “actually the Israeli government is solely responsible for what happened (Al-Aqsa Flood) for denying the rights of Palestinians.”
The Israelis are nothing if not consistent. Back in 2007, then-Israeli Defense Intelligence Chief Amos Yadlin said, “Israel would be happy if Hamas took over Gaza because IDF could then deal with Gaza as a hostile state.”
Ukraine funnels weapons to Palestinians
Only one year ago, the sweaty sweatshirt comedian in Kiev was talking about turning Ukraine into a “big Israel,” and was duly applauded by a bunch of Atlantic Council bots.
Well, it turned out quite differently. As an old-school Deep State source just informed me:
“Ukraine-earmarked weapons are ending up in the hands of the Palestinians. The question is which country is paying for it. Iran just made a deal with the US for six billion dollars and it is unlikely Iran would jeopardize that. I have a source who gave me the name of the country but I cannot reveal it. The fact is that Ukrainian weapons are going to the Gaza Strip and they are being paid for but not by Iran."
After its stunning raid last weekend, a savvy Hamas has already secured more negotiating leverage than Palestinians have wielded in decades. Significantly, while peace talks are supported by China, Russia, Turkiye, Saudi Arabia, and Egypt - Tel Aviv refuses. Netanyahu is obsessed with razing Gaza to the ground, but if that happens, a wider regional war is nearly inevitable.
Lebanon’s Hezbollah – a staunch Resistance Axis ally of the Palestinian resistance - would rather not be dragged into a war that can be devastating on its side of the border, but that could change if Israel perpetrates a de facto Gaza genocide.
Hezbollah holds at least 100,000 ballistic missiles and rockets, from Katyusha (range: 40 km) to Fajr-5 (75 km), Khaibar-1 (100 km), Zelzal 2 (210 km), Fateh-110 (300 km), and Scud B-C (500 km). Tel Aviv knows what that means, and shudders at the frequent warnings by Hezbollah leader Hassan Nasrallah that its next war with Israel will be conducted inside that country.
Which brings us to Iran.
Geopolitical plausible deniability
The key immediate consequence of Al-Aqsa Flood is that the Washington neocon wet dream of “normalization” between Israel and the Arab world will simply vanish if this turns into a Long War.
Large swathes of the Arab world in fact are already normalizing their ties with Tehran – and not only inside the newly expanded BRICS 11.
In the drive towards a multipolar world, represented by BRICS 11, the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO), Eurasian Economic Union (EAEU), and China’s Belt and Road Initiative (BRI), among other groundbreaking Eurasian and Global South institutions, there’s simply no place for an ethnocentric Apartheid state fond of collective punishment.
Just this year, Israel found itself disinvited from the African Union summit. An Israeli delegation showed up anyway, and was unceremoniously ejected from the big hall, a visual that went viral. At the UN plenary sessions last month, a lone Israeli diplomat sought to disrupt Iranian President Ibrahim Raisi’s speech. No western ally stood by his side, and he too, was ejected from the premises.
As Chinese President Xi Jinping diplomatically put it in December 2022, Beijing “firmly supports the establishment of an independent state of Palestine that enjoys full sovereignty based on 1967 borders and with East Jerusalem as its capital. China supports Palestine in becoming a full member of the United Nations.”
Tehran’s strategy is way more ambitious – offering strategic advice to West Asian resistance movements from the Levant to the Persian Gulf: Hezbollah, Ansarallah, Hashd al-Shaabi, Kataib Hezbollah, Hamas, Palestinian Islamic Jihad, and countless others. It’s as if they are all part of a new Grand Chessboard de facto supervised by Grandmaster Iran.
The pieces in the chessboard were carefully positioned by none other than the late Quds Force Commander of the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps General Qassem Soleimani, a once-in-a-lifetime military genius. He was instrumental in creating the foundations for the cumulative successes of Iranian allies in Lebanon, Syria, Iraq, Yemen, and Palestine, as well as creating the conditions for a complex operation such as Al-Aqsa Flood.
Elsewhere in the region, the Atlanticist drive of opening strategic corridors across the Five Seas - the Caspian, the Black Sea, the Red Sea, the Persian Gulf, and the Eastern Mediterranean - is floundering badly.
Russia and Iran are already smashing US designs in the Caspian – via the International North-South Transportation Corridor (INSTC) – and the Black Sea, which is on the way to becoming a Russian lake. Tehran is paying very close attention to Moscow’s strategy in Ukraine, even as it refines its own strategy on how to debilitate the Hegemon without direct involvement: call it geopolitical plausible deniability.
Bye bye EU-Israel-Saudi-India corridor
The Russia-China-Iran alliance has been demonized as the new “axis of evil” by western neocons. That infantile rage betrays cosmic impotence. These are Real Sovereigns that can’t be messed with, and if they are, the price to pay is unthinkable.
A key example: if Iran under attack by a US-Israeli axis decided to block the Strait of Hormuz, the global energy crisis would skyrocket, and the collapse of the western economy under the weight of quadrillions of derivatives would be inevitable.
What this means, in the immediate future, is that he American Dream of interfering across the Five Seas does not even qualify as a mirage. Al-Aqsa Flood has also just buried the recently-announced and much-ballyhooed EU-Israel-Saudi Arabia-India transportation corridor.
China is keenly aware of all this incandescence taking place only a week before its 3rd Belt and Road Forum in Beijing. At stake are the BRI connectivity corridors that matter – across the Heartland, across Russia, plus the Maritime Silk Road and the Arctic Silk Road.
Then there’s the INSTC linking Russia, Iran and India – and by ancillary extension, the Gulf monarchies.
The geopolitical repercussions of Al-Aqsa Flood will speed up Russia, China and Iran’s interconnected geoeconomic and logistical connections, bypassing the Hegemon and its Empire of Bases. Increased trade and non-stop cargo movement are all about (good) business. On equal terms, with mutual respect - not exactly the War Party’s scenario for a destabilized West Asia.
Oh, the things that a slow-moving paragliding infantry overflying a wall can accelerate.
* * *
The views expressed in this article do not necessarily reflect those of The Cradle or ZeroHedge.
International
Visualizing All Attempted & Successful Moon Landings
Visualizing All Attempted & Successful Moon Landings
Since before Ancient Greece and the first Chinese Dynasties, people have sought to…

Since before Ancient Greece and the first Chinese Dynasties, people have sought to understand and learn more about the moon.
Curiosity and centuries of study culminated in the first moon landing in the 1960s. But there have been many other attempted moon landings, both before and after.
This chart by Visual Capitalists' Preyash Shah illustrates all the moon landings using NASA data since 1966 when Soviet lander Luna 9 touched down.
Race to the Moon
The 1960s and 1970s marked an era of intense competition between the U.S. and the Soviet Union as they raced to conquer the moon.
During the Cold War, space became a priority as each side sought to prove the superiority of its technology, its military firepower, and its political-economic system.
In 1961, President John F. Kennedy set a national goal to have a crewed lunar landing and return to Earth.
After several failed attempts from both sides, on July 20, 1969, the Apollo 11 mission was successful and astronauts Neil Armstrong and Buzz Aldrin became the first humans to set foot on the moon.
Mission | Launch Date | Operator | Country | Mission Type | Outcome |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ranger 3 | 26-Jan-62 | NASA | ???????? U.S. | Lander | Spacecraft failure |
Ranger 4 | 23-Apr-62 | NASA | ???????? U.S. | Lander | Spacecraft failure |
Ranger 5 | 18-Oct-62 | NASA | ???????? U.S. | Lander | Spacecraft failure |
Luna E-6 No.2 | 4-Jan-63 | OKB-1 | ☭ USSR | Lander | Launch failure |
Luna E-6 No.3 | 3-Feb-63 | OKB-1 | ☭ USSR | Lander | Launch failure |
Luna 4 | 2-Apr-63 | OKB-1 | ☭ USSR | Lander | Spacecraft failure |
Luna E-6 No.6 | 21-Mar-64 | OKB-1 | ☭ USSR | Lander | Launch failure |
Luna E-6 No.5 | 20-Apr-64 | OKB-1 | ☭ USSR | Lander | Launch failure |
Kosmos 60 | 12-Mar-65 | Lavochkin | ☭ USSR | Lander | Launch failure |
Luna E-6 No.8 | 10-Apr-65 | Lavochkin | ☭ USSR | Lander | Spacecraft failure |
Luna 5 | 9-May-65 | Lavochkin | ☭ USSR | Lander | Spacecraft failure |
Luna 6 | 8-Jun-65 | Lavochkin | ☭ USSR | Lander | Spacecraft failure |
Luna 7 | 4-Oct-65 | Lavochkin | ☭ USSR | Lander | Spacecraft failure |
Luna 8 | 3-Dec-65 | Lavochkin | ☭ USSR | Lander | Spacecraft failure |
Luna 9 | 31-Jan-66 | Lavochkin | ☭ USSR | Lander | Successful |
Surveyor 1 | 30-May-66 | NASA | ???????? U.S. | Lander | Successful |
Surveyor 2 | 20-Sep-66 | NASA | ???????? U.S. | Lander | Spacecraft failure |
Luna 13 | 21-Dec-66 | Lavochkin | ☭ USSR | Lander | Successful |
Surveyor 3 | 17-Apr-67 | NASA | ???????? U.S. | Lander | Successful |
Surveyor 4 | 14-Jul-67 | NASA | ???????? U.S. | Lander | Spacecraft failure |
Surveyor 5 | 8-Sep-67 | NASA | ???????? U.S. | Lander | Successful |
Surveyor 6 | 7-Nov-67 | NASA | ???????? U.S. | Lander | Successful |
Surveyor 7 | 7-Jan-68 | NASA | ???????? U.S. | Lander | Successful |
Luna E-8 No.201 | 19-Feb-69 | Lavochkin | ☭ USSR | Lander | Launch failure |
Luna E-8-5 No.402 | 14-Jun-69 | Lavochkin | ☭ USSR | Lander | Launch failure |
Luna 15 | 13-Jul-69 | Lavochkin | ☭ USSR | Lander | Spacecraft failure |
Apollo 11 | 16-Jul-69 | NASA | ???????? U.S. | Lander/ Launch Vehicle |
Successful |
Kosmos 300 | 23-Sep-69 | Lavochkin | ☭ USSR | Lander | Launch failure |
Kosmos 305 | 22-Oct-69 | Lavochkin | ☭ USSR | Lander | Launch failure |
Apollo 12 | 14-Nov-69 | NASA | ???????? U.S. | Lander/ Launch Vehicle |
Successful |
Luna E-8-5 No.405 | 6-Feb-70 | Lavochkin | ☭ USSR | Lander | Launch failure |
Apollo 13 | 11-Apr-70 | NASA | ???????? U.S. | Lander/ Launch Vehicle |
Partial failure |
Luna 16 | 12-Sep-70 | Lavochkin | ☭ USSR | Lander | Successful |
Luna 17 | 10-Nov-70 | Lavochkin | ☭ USSR | Lander | Successful |
Apollo 14 | 31-Jan-71 | NASA | ???????? U.S. | Lander/ Launch Vehicle |
Successful |
Apollo 15 | 26-Jul-71 | NASA | ???????? U.S. | Lander/ Launch Vehicle |
Successful |
Luna 18 | 2-Sep-71 | Lavochkin | ☭ USSR | Lander | Spacecraft failure |
Luna 20 | 14-Feb-72 | Lavochkin | ☭ USSR | Lander | Successful |
Apollo 16 | 16-Apr-72 | NASA | ???????? U.S. | Lander/ Launch Vehicle |
Successful |
Apollo 17 | 7-Dec-72 | NASA | ???????? U.S. | Lander/ Launch Vehicle |
Successful |
Luna 21 | 8-Jan-73 | Lavochkin | ☭ USSR | Lander | Successful |
Luna 23 | 16-Oct-75 | Lavochkin | ☭ USSR | Lander | Partial failure |
Luna E-8-5M No.412 | 16-Oct-75 | Lavochkin | ☭ USSR | Lander | Launch failure |
Luna 24 | 9-Aug-76 | Lavochkin | ☭ USSR | Lander | Successful |
Chang'e 3 | 1-Dec-13 | CNSA | ???????? China | Lander | Operational |
Chang'e 4 | 7-Dec-18 | CNSA | ???????? China | Lander | Operational |
Beresheet | 22-Feb-19 | SpaceIL | ???????? Israel | Lander | Spacecraft failure |
Chandrayaan-2 | 22-Jul-19 | ISRO | ???????? India | Lander | Spacecraft Failure |
Chang'e 5 | 23-Nov-20 | CNSA | ???????? China | Lander | Successful |
Hakuto-R Mission 1 | 11-Dec-22 | ispace | ???????? Japan | Lander | Spacecraft failure |
Chandrayaan-3 | 14-Jul-23 | ISRO | ???????? India | Lander | Successful |
Luna 25 | 10-Aug-23 | Roscosmos | ???????? Russia | Lander | Spacecraft failure |
After the Apollo missions, the fervor of lunar exploration waned. From 1976 to 2013, no moon landing attempts occurred due to budget constraints, shifting priorities, and advances in robotic missions.
However, a new chapter in space exploration has unfolded in recent years, with emerging players entering the cosmic arena. With its Chang’e missions, China has made significant strides, landing rovers on the moon and exploring the far side of the moon.
India, too, has asserted its presence with the Chandrayaan missions. In 2023, the country became the 4th nation to reach the moon as an unmanned spacecraft landed near the lunar south pole, advancing the country’s space ambitions to learn more about the lunar ice, potentially one of the moon’s most valuable resources.
Exploring Lunar Water
Since the 1960s, even before the historic Apollo landing, scientists had theorized the potential existence of water on the moon.
In 2008, Brown University researchers employed advanced technology to reexamine lunar samples, discovering hydrogen within beads of volcanic glass. And in 2009, a NASA instrument aboard the India’s Chandrayaan-1 probe confirmed the presence of water on the moon’s surface.
Water is deemed crucial for future space exploration. Beyond serving as a potential source of drinking water for future moon explorations, ice deposits could play a pivotal role in cooling equipment. Lunar ice could also be broken down to produce hydrogen for fuel and oxygen for breathing, essential for supporting extended space missions.
With a reinvigorated interest in exploring the moon, manned moon landings are on the horizon once again. In April 2023, NASA conducted tests for the launch of Artemis I, the first American spacecraft to aim for the moon since 1972. The agency aims to send astronauts to the moon around 2025 and build a base camp on the lunar surface.
-
International4 hours ago
Visualizing All Attempted & Successful Moon Landings
-
Uncategorized21 hours ago
Ferrari to accept crypto payments in the US
-
Uncategorized14 hours ago
Tesla’s EV throne is being chipped away at by this surprising luxury brand
-
Uncategorized14 hours ago
Ex-Walmart CEO Says US Consumers Reaching ‘Breaking Point’
-
International20 hours ago
Week Ahead: Softness in US Real Sector, Key UK and Canadian Data, and China’s Q3 GDP
-
International17 hours ago
Russia Denies Talks Of A Gas Cartel
-
Uncategorized10 hours ago
Caroline Ellison speaks on FTX-Binance war, SEC won’t appeal Grayscale BTC ETF: Hodler’s Digest, Oct. 8-14
-
International18 hours ago
Undeniable Toxic Ingredients In HPV Vaccines