Connect with us

Morty CEO Nora Apsel discusses the online mortgage marketplace and its journey to open access to all

FinLedger spoke with Morty co-founder Nora Apsel, who rose from engineer to COO and now CEO, about the company’s journey, overarching goals and plans moving…

Published

on

Over the past few years, digital transformation has increasingly changed the way property and real estate transactions occur. A vertical which has seen a strong digital push is mortgages, with consumers, lenders and other agents increasingly using online tools and services to apply for and process home sales.

Nora Apsel, Morty co-founder and CEO

One company leading this charge is Morty, an online mortgage marketplace that matches customers with the right loan product for them, using technology to automate and manage the entire experience. The company has found success since its founding, doubling its size over the past year and processing over a billion dollars in loans to date.

Morty also recently raised a $25 million Series B from leading investors March Capital, Rethink Impact, Thrive Capital, Prudence and Lerer Hippeau.

FinLedger spoke with Morty co-founder Nora Apsel, who rose from engineer to COO and now CEO, about the company’s journey, overarching goals and plans moving forward.

Q: First off, can you just describe Morty and the services you offer?

A: Morty is an online mortgage marketplace, so we leverage great product and technology to first match customers with the right loan product for them. Then, we automate and manage the entire experience all the way through to closing, so we’re a full service platform. We take customers from the very beginning, figure out what they can afford, to the very end of closing on their loan.

Q: What would you say are the biggest challenges when it comes to bringing those two pieces together? Matching customers and partnering with lenders?

A: Taking a step back, my background historically is as an engineer. Part of the reason why Morty was so very interesting to me when we founded it was because it really presented this opportunity of overlap. How can we leverage technology to really do better for the consumer and promote their needs, as opposed to the traditional mortgage approach which is very much from the banks or the lender’s perspective.

Getting to what your actual question was, which is, ‘What’s the challenge in matching these two things?’ It’s really about the technology and the data flow. The reason why Morty is unique and is able to offer this access to customers in a way that traditional mortgage providers can’t is because we’re taking in all of this data from both consumers and from lenders. It’s our pricing engine that’s really identifying, ‘What is the best thing for this person right now?’ Everything changes every single day, so being able to take in all of those things and say today, what is the best thing to match customers in a really transparent user friendly type of way?

Q: Over the past couple years, what have you seen as far as technology demand growth along those lines? Are people still getting their feet in?

A: I think the progress over the past year has been quite measurable, but I still think we’re just at the beginning. If we were having this conversation five years ago, I would say the big challenge is getting people online. How do we figure out how to make sure customers know that they can get their mortgage online, and that it’s better, more transparent and secure?

That pendulum has swung a little bit more with the pandemic, and people are becoming more comfortable with real estate transactions online. You saw all that happen in 2020, and now mortgages is feeling that as well. We believe that’s a trend that doesn’t go backwards, so we’ll just continue. Customers will continue to make that migration online and it’s really the last financial transaction to be moved online.

Q: You said you have an engineering background. What have been the biggest challenges for you when it comes to learning about the mortgage industry? What has been the most eye opening thing that you’ve learned through the whole process?

A: I was an engineer for over a decade and then even before that, I worked in nonprofits for a while, so my interests are really around where technology and large scale social or financial impact intersect. I think the thing that continues to surprise me, even though I’ve been in this industry for so long, is the blackbox nature of mortgage. Customers give some information and they get out a number, or a bunch of documents that they need, and there’s no understanding of why or how to change that.

That’s the reason why you hear from customers that their mortgage was really confusing, the communication was bad and their cost was too high. It’s because everything is super blackbox and confusing, and I think even when we founded the company, I vastly underestimated the ‘blackbox-ness,’ if that is a word, of the industry.

Q: What do you think needs to be done to improve that transparency? Is it just on the technology, or is it in advocacy? Where do you see the biggest potential to educate people?

A: There are a couple of things, and one is definitely education. The content that customers want is that which puts the customer first, and gives and leads with transparency and information. The third is really building a broader ecosystem of real estate and fintech companies that are looking to help the customer, putting the customer first and making sure all of the those players in that ecosystem are connected in a really transparent way, so that the customer always knows what’s going on and what their options are.

Q: Looking at the ecosystem and your previous point about data, have you seen data driving this ecosystem forward? What have you seen data bring to the table as far as things coming together?

A: I think mortgage is a pretty big industry and I would break it into two parts around the consumer side, and then the servicing and secondary market side. I think it’s been pretty impressive to see some of the data providers and new tech startups coming to support the second part, like the servicing in the secondary markets. I think it’s the first time that the area has really seen that, which is pretty cool.

But in the consumer side, where Morty sits, it still operates largely in silos so the data share is not where it should be. We should be able to free flow, we should be able to share data when it’s beneficial for the customer, right? Whether it’s information about the transaction or the appraisal, or the homeowners insurance, numbers, that stuff should all be able to be gathered in one place so that the customer always knows what’s going on. What are their options, how much longer, what do they need to do?

Q: Do you see that happening, or is that just something that will take longer to break down. Is it even possible with regulation and things of that nature?

A: It’s possible. To be clear, I’m not looking to like share personal identifying information (PII). I think it’s possible, but I think it’s gonna take time because what you need is data forward, typically startups, to grow in these areas, and then begin to work together in tandem for the customer.

Q: Can you talk about last year’s Series B, and how you’ve been using that funding?

A: For us, the Series B was really about being able to expand out our marketplace. Our vision is to really be a single point of access into the home financing market, for anybody and everybody. But when we closed our Series B, we were focused on purchase and primary homes. We’ve used the money to hire and grow the team really with the notion of wanting to be able to expand out this marketplace, and to be able to be that single point of access for all consumers.

Q: Can you just talk about secondary versus primary and what the biggest points of differentiation are when looking at how you deal with them?

A: There’s different eligibility and pricing guidelines associated with every different home type. For us, we care a lot about making sure every product that we offer on our site is done in a transparent, accurate way and is very user friendly. So that the customer can self-operate, which is a big part of how our sight of our product works. The expansion was really about, “okay, we nailed primary homes, now let’s make sure we’re offering that same level of service and accuracy at secondary homes,” then jumbos and investment homes as we continue to expand out.

Q: That leads to my next question. What are your big goals for 2022, and what are some things you’re excited to tackle?

A: It’s largely the same answer in that it’s all about being this like single point of access. That’s the power of a marketplace, right? It’s this one-stop shop that anybody can go to, to really find the right thing. I think the stuff I’m especially excited about, in addition, is expanding to all sorts of loan types. I’m excited to expand out to other home financing solutions and partner with great companies that are doing that now. You know, a mortgage is not the right option for everybody. For some people it might be a rent-to-own solution. For some people, it might be all-cash first and then a mortgage. There are some really great startups and more established companies that are doing those types of things. We’re excited as a marketplace to partner with those people, so that we can direct customers to what is the best thing for them.

Q: Looking around at these other startups, are there any that excite you or that you’d like to partner with?

A: There are some very cool things happening in proptech and fintech. If we can talk about me personally as opposed to Morty, I think one of the cool things in proptech is the ability to build your home completely online, and really making it totally modular and universal. I think that’s super exciting and really reflects innovation in a couple of different areas, including things like construction, that I know nothing about.

I think for us, again, we are continuously going back to this concept of access, and wanting to make sure that customers are getting all the different types of access to the right type of thing. One thing that we’re interested in is the intersection of mortgage and crypto. How do we make sure that people who have invested heavily in crypto are able to leverage those types of assets? We haven’t done anything on that, but I think it’s really interesting. It all goes back to the fact people should be able to know how to get the right mortgage for them, and should be able to go to one single point of access to find that.

Q: Does it come back to, like you said with data silos, the fact a lot of people just aren’t applicable for certain things because their data isn’t shown in a typical FICO score?

A: I would say the inability to underwrite a mortgage with crypto is not like the biggest problem, but it could be it. I believe it will increasingly become more challenging, because more people will continue to invest in it and it will be a more dominant asset type.

For the questions that you’re talking about around FICO. We all know that FICO is not equitable. I think that there are a lot of interesting products out there for consumers in a variety of different situations, but very often, those customers have no idea that they can get a mortgage or how to get one. Similarly, many times the companies that are offering those types of products don’t know how to connect with the right customer. That really shows, and that’s really where the value of the marketplace comes in. It’s this matchmaking experience.

Q: You went from co-founding the company as an engineer, then went on to act as COO and now CEO. What has that journey been like, and what have you learned along the way?

A: The journey has consistently been challenging, and that’s startups, right? I think for me, I have approached every single challenge very much from an engineering mindset. So there is a problem. Let’s identify what the potential solutions are, let’s create a process around that solution, let’s implement it and then let’s test it. That paradigm has served me very well, because it allows you to create structure and a lot of transparency with your team. I think as you’re building a company, you know, we are really fortunate to have some people who have been with Morty for you know, three or four or five years. That comes from really being able to build transparency around, ‘Where are we going?’ and ‘How are we going to get there?’ and ‘How are we doing?’

Q: What do you look for when searching for talent?

A: You’re hitting on engineering, because it’s definitely the talk of the startup world, but for us in general, when hiring people I think we do have a quite specific culture here. Everybody believes in what we’re building and is working towards that vision. I think being bought into the mission and the vision of the company is really important, because what we’re doing is very hard and it’s going to take a long time. It’s not get the startup up and just run it for a couple of years. There’s a lot of investment in that and that has been really important.

Even getting back to engineering, we run a really tight engineering hiring process, and a big part of it is just finding the right people. For engineers the challenge that we have is really centered around data transparency and efficiency, and those are super interesting problems. It’s really about like finding the right people that are excited about solving those problems and being part of a mission-driven company.

Q: Through this whole journey, what has been your biggest win or milestone you’ve been the most excited about?

A: It’s a really challenging question, because startups are actually just a bunch of really small wins, but I have two. One was when we got our license in New York. New York is notoriously the hardest state to get your mortgage license in, and we spent a lot of time making sure what we submitted was perfect. We were really proud when we got that license, because it opened up a ton of opportunity for us and helped us take a big step further on our on our pursuit of 50-state coverage. That was a really big thing.

And then I think the other thing that was like a pretty big milestone for us was when we were able to begin to see customers come through our product and go all the way to locking in their loans, or locking in their interest rate, without phone calls. Recognizing that this can be done in an automated, digital way and that customers do want to self-transact in this type of way … was real validation for us.

Q: You brought up the 50-state coverage. How many are you in now, and what are your expansion plans?

A: We are in 43 states right now, and our goal is to be in all 50 states by the end of the year.

Q: That’s all I have for you, Nora. Is there anything I didn’t ask about you or Morty that you think I should know?

A: The thing I always make sure to communicate is that the differentiator for Morty really comes from this combination of our marketplace bottle and our investment and focus in growing through product and tech and believing that it is the better way to transact. It’s more transparent, more cost effective, and it’s also what consumers want.

The post Morty CEO Nora Apsel discusses the online mortgage marketplace and its journey to open access to all appeared first on HousingWire.

Read More

Continue Reading

Uncategorized

Wendy’s teases new $3 offer for upcoming holiday

The Daylight Savings Time promotion slashes prices on breakfast.

Published

on

Daylight Savings Time, or the practice of advancing clocks an hour in the spring to maximize natural daylight, is a controversial practice because of the way it leaves many feeling off-sync and tired on the second Sunday in March when the change is made and one has one less hour to sleep in.

Despite annual "Abolish Daylight Savings Time" think pieces and online arguments that crop up with unwavering regularity, Daylight Savings in North America begins on March 10 this year.

Related: Coca-Cola has a new soda for Diet Coke fans

Tapping into some people's very vocal dislike of Daylight Savings Time, fast-food chain Wendy's  (WEN)  is launching a daylight savings promotion that is jokingly designed to make losing an hour of sleep less painful and encourage fans to order breakfast anyway.

Wendy's has recently made a big push to expand its breakfast menu.

Image source: Wendy's.

Promotion wants you to compensate for lost sleep with cheaper breakfast

As it is also meant to drive traffic to the Wendy's app, the promotion allows anyone who makes a purchase of $3 or more through the platform to get a free hot coffee, cold coffee or Frosty Cream Cold Brew.

More Food + Dining:

Available during the Wendy's breakfast hours of 6 a.m. and 10:30 a.m. (which, naturally, will feel even earlier due to Daylight Savings), the deal also allows customers to buy any of its breakfast sandwiches for $3. Items like the Sausage, Egg and Cheese Biscuit, Breakfast Baconator and Maple Bacon Chicken Croissant normally range in price between $4.50 and $7.

The choice of the latter is quite wide since, in the years following the pandemic, Wendy's has made a concerted effort to expand its breakfast menu with a range of new sandwiches with egg in them and sweet items such as the French Toast Sticks. The goal was both to stand out from competitors with a wider breakfast menu and increase traffic to its stores during early-morning hours.

Wendy's deal comes after controversy over 'dynamic pricing'

But last month, the chain known for the square shape of its burger patties ignited controversy after saying that it wanted to introduce "dynamic pricing" in which the cost of many of the items on its menu will vary depending on the time of day. In an earnings call, chief executive Kirk Tanner said that electronic billboards would allow restaurants to display various deals and promotions during slower times in the early morning and late at night.

Outcry was swift and Wendy's ended up walking back its plans with words that they were "misconstrued" as an intent to surge prices during its most popular periods.

While the company issued a statement saying that any changes were meant as "discounts and value offers" during quiet periods rather than raised prices during busy ones, the reputational damage was already done since many saw the clarification as another way to obfuscate its pricing model.

"We said these menuboards would give us more flexibility to change the display of featured items," Wendy's said in its statement. "This was misconstrued in some media reports as an intent to raise prices when demand is highest at our restaurants."

The Daylight Savings Time promotion, in turn, is also a way to demonstrate the kinds of deals Wendy's wants to promote in its stores without putting up full-sized advertising or posters for what is only relevant for a few days.

Related: Veteran fund manager picks favorite stocks for 2024

Read More

Continue Reading

Uncategorized

Inside The Most Ridiculous Jobs Report In Recent History: Record 1.2 Million Immigrant Jobs Added In One Month

Inside The Most Ridiculous Jobs Report In Recent History: Record 1.2 Million Immigrant Jobs Added In One Month

Last month we though that the…

Published

on

Inside The Most Ridiculous Jobs Report In Recent History: Record 1.2 Million Immigrant Jobs Added In One Month

Last month we though that the January jobs report was the "most ridiculous in recent history" but, boy, were we wrong because this morning the Biden department of goalseeked propaganda (aka BLS) published the February jobs report, and holy crap was that something else. Even Goebbels would blush. 

What happened? Let's take a closer look.

On the surface, it was (almost) another blockbuster jobs report, certainly one which nobody expected, or rather just one bank out of 76 expected. Starting at the top, the BLS reported that in February the US unexpectedly added 275K jobs, with just one research analyst (from Dai-Ichi Research) expecting a higher number.

Some context: after last month's record 4-sigma beat, today's print was "only" 3 sigma higher than estimates. Needless to say, two multiple sigma beats in a row used to only happen in the USSR... and now in the US, apparently.

Before we go any further, a quick note on what last month we said was "the most ridiculous jobs report in recent history": it appears the BLS read our comments and decided to stop beclowing itself. It did that by slashing last month's ridiculous print by over a third, and revising what was originally reported as a massive 353K beat to just 229K,  a 124K revision, which was the biggest one-month negative revision in two years!

Of course, that does not mean that this month's jobs print won't be revised lower: it will be, and not just that month but every other month until the November election because that's the only tool left in the Biden admin's box: pretend the economic and jobs are strong, then revise them sharply lower the next month, something we pointed out first last summer and which has not failed to disappoint once.

To be fair, not every aspect of the jobs report was stellar (after all, the BLS had to give it some vague credibility). Take the unemployment rate, after flatlining between 3.4% and 3.8% for two years - and thus denying expectations from Sahm's Rule that a recession may have already started - in February the unemployment rate unexpectedly jumped to 3.9%, the highest since February 2022 (with Black unemployment spiking by 0.3% to 5.6%, an indicator which the Biden admin will quickly slam as widespread economic racism or something).

And then there were average hourly earnings, which after surging 0.6% MoM in January (since revised to 0.5%) and spooking markets that wage growth is so hot, the Fed will have no choice but to delay cuts, in February the number tumbled to just 0.1%, the lowest in two years...

... for one simple reason: last month's average wage surge had nothing to do with actual wages, and everything to do with the BLS estimate of hours worked (which is the denominator in the average wage calculation) which last month tumbled to just 34.1 (we were led to believe) the lowest since the covid pandemic...

... but has since been revised higher while the February print rose even more, to 34.3, hence why the latest average wage data was once again a product not of wages going up, but of how long Americans worked in any weekly period, in this case higher from 34.1 to 34.3, an increase which has a major impact on the average calculation.

While the above data points were examples of some latent weakness in the latest report, perhaps meant to give it a sheen of veracity, it was everything else in the report that was a problem starting with the BLS's latest choice of seasonal adjustments (after last month's wholesale revision), which have gone from merely laughable to full clownshow, as the following comparison between the monthly change in BLS and ADP payrolls shows. The trend is clear: the Biden admin numbers are now clearly rising even as the impartial ADP (which directly logs employment numbers at the company level and is far more accurate), shows an accelerating slowdown.

But it's more than just the Biden admin hanging its "success" on seasonal adjustments: when one digs deeper inside the jobs report, all sorts of ugly things emerge... such as the growing unprecedented divergence between the Establishment (payrolls) survey and much more accurate Household (actual employment) survey. To wit, while in January the BLS claims 275K payrolls were added, the Household survey found that the number of actually employed workers dropped for the third straight month (and 4 in the past 5), this time by 184K (from 161.152K to 160.968K).

This means that while the Payrolls series hits new all time highs every month since December 2020 (when according to the BLS the US had its last month of payrolls losses), the level of Employment has not budged in the past year. Worse, as shown in the chart below, such a gaping divergence has opened between the two series in the past 4 years, that the number of Employed workers would need to soar by 9 million (!) to catch up to what Payrolls claims is the employment situation.

There's more: shifting from a quantitative to a qualitative assessment, reveals just how ugly the composition of "new jobs" has been. Consider this: the BLS reports that in February 2024, the US had 132.9 million full-time jobs and 27.9 million part-time jobs. Well, that's great... until you look back one year and find that in February 2023 the US had 133.2 million full-time jobs, or more than it does one year later! And yes, all the job growth since then has been in part-time jobs, which have increased by 921K since February 2023 (from 27.020 million to 27.941 million).

Here is a summary of the labor composition in the past year: all the new jobs have been part-time jobs!

But wait there's even more, because now that the primary season is over and we enter the heart of election season and political talking points will be thrown around left and right, especially in the context of the immigration crisis created intentionally by the Biden administration which is hoping to import millions of new Democratic voters (maybe the US can hold the presidential election in Honduras or Guatemala, after all it is their citizens that will be illegally casting the key votes in November), what we find is that in February, the number of native-born workers tumbled again, sliding by a massive 560K to just 129.807 million. Add to this the December data, and we get a near-record 2.4 million plunge in native-born workers in just the past 3 months (only the covid crash was worse)!

The offset? A record 1.2 million foreign-born (read immigrants, both legal and illegal but mostly illegal) workers added in February!

Said otherwise, not only has all job creation in the past 6 years has been exclusively for foreign-born workers...

Source: St Louis Fed FRED Native Born and Foreign Born

... but there has been zero job-creation for native born workers since June 2018!

This is a huge issue - especially at a time of an illegal alien flood at the southwest border...

... and is about to become a huge political scandal, because once the inevitable recession finally hits, there will be millions of furious unemployed Americans demanding a more accurate explanation for what happened - i.e., the illegal immigration floodgates that were opened by the Biden admin.

Which is also why Biden's handlers will do everything in their power to insure there is no official recession before November... and why after the election is over, all economic hell will finally break loose. Until then, however, expect the jobs numbers to get even more ridiculous.

Tyler Durden Fri, 03/08/2024 - 13:30

Read More

Continue Reading

Uncategorized

Shipping company files surprise Chapter 7 bankruptcy, liquidation

While demand for trucking has increased, so have costs and competition, which have forced a number of players to close.

Published

on

The U.S. economy is built on trucks.

As a nation we have relatively limited train assets, and while in recent years planes have played an expanded role in moving goods, trucks still represent the backbone of how everything — food, gasoline, commodities, and pretty much anything else — moves around the country.

Related: Fast-food chain closes more stores after Chapter 11 bankruptcy

"Trucks moved 61.1% of the tonnage and 64.9% of the value of these shipments. The average shipment by truck was 63 miles compared to an average of 640 miles by rail," according to the U.S. Bureau of Transportation Statistics 2023 numbers.

But running a trucking company has been tricky because the largest players have economies of scale that smaller operators don't. That puts any trucking company that's not a massive player very sensitive to increases in gas prices or drops in freight rates.

And that in turn has led a number of trucking companies, including Yellow Freight, the third-largest less-than-truckload operator; J.J. & Sons Logistics, Meadow Lark, and Boateng Logistics, to close while freight brokerage Convoy shut down in October.

Aside from Convoy, none of these brands are household names. but with the demand for trucking increasing, every company that goes out of business puts more pressure on those that remain, which contributes to increased prices.

Demand for trucking has continued to increase.

Image source: Shutterstock

Another freight company closes and plans to liquidate

Not every bankruptcy filing explains why a company has gone out of business. In the trucking industry, multiple recent Chapter 7 bankruptcies have been tied to lawsuits that pushed otherwise successful companies into insolvency.

In the case of TBL Logistics, a Virginia-based national freight company, its Feb. 29 bankruptcy filing in U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Western District of Virginia appears to be death by too much debt.

"In its filing, TBL Logistics listed its assets and liabilities as between $1 million and $10 million. The company stated that it has up to 49 creditors and maintains that no funds will be available for unsecured creditors once it pays administrative fees," Freightwaves reported.

The company's owners, Christopher and Melinda Bradner, did not respond to the website's request for comment.

Before it closed, TBL Logistics specialized in refrigerated and oversized loads. The company described its business on its website.

"TBL Logistics is a non-asset-based third-party logistics freight broker company providing reliable and efficient transportation solutions, management, and storage for businesses of all sizes. With our extensive network of carriers and industry expertise, we streamline the shipping process, ensuring your goods reach their destination safely and on time."

The world has a truck-driver shortage

The covid pandemic forced companies to consider their supply chain in ways they never had to before. Increased demand showed the weakness in the trucking industry and drew attention to how difficult life for truck drivers can be.

That was an issue HBO's John Oliver highlighted on his "Last Week Tonight" show in October 2022. In the episode, the host suggested that the U.S. would basically start to starve if the trucking industry shut down for three days.

"Sorry, three days, every produce department in America would go from a fully stocked market to an all-you-can-eat raccoon buffet," he said. "So it’s no wonder trucking’s a huge industry, with more than 3.5 million people in America working as drivers, from port truckers who bring goods off ships to railyards and warehouses, to long-haul truckers who move them across the country, to 'last-mile' drivers, who take care of local delivery." 

The show highlighted how many truck drivers face low pay, difficult working conditions and, in many cases, crushing debt.

"Hundreds of thousands of people become truck drivers every year. But hundreds of thousands also quit. Job turnover for truckers averages over 100%, and at some companies it’s as high as 300%, meaning they’re hiring three people for a single job over the course of a year. And when a field this important has a level of job satisfaction that low, it sure seems like there’s a huge problem," Oliver shared.

The truck-driver shortage is not just a U.S. problem; it's a global issue, according to IRU.org.

"IRU’s 2023 driver shortage report has found that over three million truck driver jobs are unfilled, or 7% of total positions, in 36 countries studied," the global transportation trade association reported. 

"With the huge gap between young and old drivers growing, it will get much worse over the next five years without significant action."

Related: Veteran fund manager picks favorite stocks for 2024

Read More

Continue Reading

Trending