Connect with us

McLain Capital 1Q20 letter to investors

McLain Capital 1Q20 letter to investors

Published

on

Park Aerospace an Economic Downturn diversified portfolio long-term investor Proposed Stimulus Plans Greg Boland High cape value big Tech Generations trust document Right Investments Victorias Secret Asana INDEXNASDAQ: .IXIC controlling influence negative reactions Alfred Winslow Jones

McLain Capital letter to investors for the first quarter ended March 31, 2020.

McLain Capital

McLain Capital Performance and Positioning Summary

For the first quarter of 2020, McLain Capital Fund I, LP returned +4.1%, net of all fees, outperforming our benchmark, the S&P 500, by approximately 25 percentage points. Throughout the first quarter, the fund’s net market exposure ranged from 20% to 35%, net long, with the fund initially positioned with gross exposures of 95% of capital long, 60% short. Given the extraordinary level of volatility in markets and the severe underperformance of many value-oriented strategies, I’m pleased with last quarter’s performance and continue to see a highly favorable opportunity set given the current dislocation across markets.

Get The Full Ray Dalio Series in PDF

Get the entire 10-part series on Ray Dalio in PDF. Save it to your desktop, read it on your tablet, or email to your colleagues

Q1 2020 hedge fund letters, conferences and more

After our quarterly rebalance/repositioning during the last few days of March, we are currently positioned 35% net long, our long-term target net exposure, with gross positioning at approximately 77% long, 42% short. The fund’s long portfolio is roughly equal-weighted and is positioned across 33 issuers with no single position occupying more than 3% of capital; the short portfolio is currently positioned across 52 issuers with no single position occupying more than 1.5% of capital.

What Happened?

Over the past six weeks we’ve witnessed the fastest sell-off in stocks in our country’s history, with a 34% sell-off in the S&P 500, from February 19th to March 23rd, only to rally 16% into quarter end. Last month’s price action brought the VIX volatility index to historically unprecedented levels, surpassing those seen during the height of the Great Financial Crisis in late 2008. Incredibly, during the lows seen on March 23rd, the median NYSE-listed stock was down over 50% from the highs. The volatility was hardly contained to just equities, as both investment grade & high yield credit experienced the largest one week sell off in history. The ICE BofA US High Yield Index widened over 700 basis points from the February 17th tights of 357 basis points to March 23rd wides of 1087bps, a truly enormous move. It seems a combination of extremely low levels of liquidity and margin calls/forced deleveraging of some participants was a large driver behind much of the price action during some of the more chaotic sessions over the past month.

COVID-19 and its tertiary effects will likely prove to be the most acute disruption the global economy has experienced over the past 100 years. Jobless claims in the United States for the last 2 weeks of March have already totaled 10 million, a staggering and unprecedented shock to labor markets. Fortunately, COVID-19’s impact on public health, the economy, and the financial system have been met with extraordinarily proactive measures by governments around the world. On the monetary policy front, the dizzying array of actions by the Federal Reserve have provided much-needed liquidity to bank balance sheets, US dollar currency swaps, the commercial paper market, and what was briefly a highly dysfunctional market in US treasuries. By stepping in early as a lender of last resort & liquidity provider, the Fed’s actions have effectively unclogged the plumbing of the financial system and funding markets, allowing for the uninterrupted free flow of payments and credit while corporate borrowers have drawn over $200 billion in revolving lines of credit. In terms of fiscal policy, Congress’s extraordinary actions have provided a much-needed stopgap for the American public as parts of our economy go offline. All politics aside, there can be no perfect bill or one size fits all response by the federal government, yet the recent bipartisanship in the face of a severe crisis is highly reassuring in that the United States Government is both willing and able to take effective steps to arrest the dual crisis in public health and the economy.

“Investment markets follow a pendulum-like swing between euphoria and depression, between celebrating positive developments and obsessing over negatives, and thus between overpriced and underpriced.” Howard Marks, Oaktree Capital

Where Do Markets Stand Now?

As tumultuous as markets have been, I believe it’s all the more important for investors to step back, examine the larger picture, and remind themselves 1) that what we are currently experiencing is inherently temporary, and 2) that the intrinsic value of a business is the present value of its future cash flows in perpetuity, and that several quarters of poor earnings doesn’t dramatically affect a companies true worth based on its long term earnings potential.

As of the close on April 1, the S&P 500 stands at 2470, translating to an Enterprise Value/EBITDA multiple of 11x, and a free cash flow yield of 6%, both of which are roughly in line with their respective long-term averages. By these metrics, one could argue that large cap US equities are fairly priced. Yet, given that interest rates stand well below long-term averages, another could reasonably hold that stocks at current valuations look quite attractive relative to treasury yields; over the past 100 years the 10-year Treasury yield has averaged 4.5% and currently stands at a measly .58%.

A very bullish (and highly suspect) argument could sound something like this: US equities have produced annual rate of return of roughly 10% over the long term, providing an excess return of approximately 5.5% over 10-year Treasuries. With a simple assumption that earnings continue to grow at their long term average of 4% per annum, and rates remain “lower for longer” a bull could state that the market should trade at a free cash flow yield of 2-3%, which would equate to the market trading at a level more than twice as high as we currently stand. If this sounds ridiculous, its important to note the market was trading at a sub 3% FCF yield for a few years during the height of the tech bubble in the late 1990s and early 2000s, a time when 10-year Treasuries were yielding approx. 6%, 500+ bps higher than current levels. Alternatively, someone with a very bearish point of view could state that, given we are experiencing the largest economic shock in modern history, we ought to be trading in line with 2009 trough valuations of 8x EBITDA: translating to the S&P 500 at 1600, 35% lower than current levels. Obviously, both of these scenarios are extreme and are just an illustration of how difficult it is to handicap whole market equity risk and how challenging it is to use valuation to time the market.

In bull markets or bear markets we’re never short of prognosticators who assert opinions on short term market direction, year-end price targets, etc. Many of whom, dubbed “strategists”, have no real skin in the game themselves or any real accountability to the forecasts they make to their clients. To quote the economist John Kenneth Galbraith, “We have two classes of forecasters: Those who don’t know – and those who don’t know they don’t know.”

Most pertinent to us, the recent volatility has caused valuation spreads (the degree of dispersion in valuations across the market) to reach unprecedented levels – surpassing those seen during the height of the dotcom bubble. This has occurred in not only US stocks, but in foreign developed and emerging markets as well. Statistically speaking, the current backdrop and opportunity set for value-oriented long/short equity managers has never been better. Currently, our long positions carry an average free cash flow yield of 26% and EV/EBITDA of 2.1x. By comparison, the S&P trades at a FCF yield of 6% and EV/EBITDA of 11x. Importantly, all of our long positions are strong credits with healthy balance sheets - most of which are carrying net cash (more cash than debt) or negligible amounts of net debt and are well-equipped to navigate a credit constrained environment.

McLain Capital

Why Does Our Approach To Investing Give Us An Edge?

First and foremost, there’s nothing particularly ground-breaking about how we approach markets. We simply believe that markets often misprice individual securities due to ignorance, overoptimistic expectations, or irrational fear, and, thus, are “inefficient”. Our value-add as an investment manager is in highly disciplined, data-driven, “bottom-up” stock selection designed to capitalize on these mispricings. To do so effectively often requires a willingness to bear a contrarian outlook. A value investor seeking the best opportunities – that is, stocks with compellingly low valuations - will often find himself venturing in overlooked markets, in unpopular industries, looking at companies surrounded by negative sentiment or possessing unglamorous businesses. All of which may sound counter-intuitive for an ideal investment. Yet, pessimistic market sentiment or general disregard on the part of investors often forces market valuations well below a conservative estimate of intrinsic value, creating opportunities for the investor willing to stray from the herd. In order to outperform the market, one has to assemble a portfolio that looks meaningfully different than the market. Outlined below are a variety of reasons that we believe set us apart and give us an “edge” in our approach.

“For a value investor, price has to be the starting point. It has been demonstrated time and time again that no asset is so good that it can’t become a bad investment if bought at too high a price. And there are few assets so bad that they can’t be a good investment when bought cheap enough… No asset class or investment has the birthright of a high return. It’s only attractive if it’s priced right.” Howard Marks

First, I believe that an objectively disciplined & repeatable idea generation and investment process is imperative in delivering sustainable outperformance. The primary intent of which is to remain focused on the most predictive factors of long-term performance: valuation & capital efficiency. A heavily quantitative approach to security selection insulates our decision-making by removing subjectivity, emotion, and behavioral bias. We don’t try to imbue our process and strategy with complicated macro narratives, dogmatic views on the short-term direction of markets, or conjecture of specific companies’ future earnings growth. Instead, we use an empirically supported security selection process and proprietary model that’s designed to reflect the relative attractiveness of every company in our 6000+ company database. Our model is driven by ten fundamental metrics, roughly half of which are valuation focused, the other half “quality” or capital efficiency focused. We’re obviously not going to bat 1.000, nor always outperform, but I firmly believe an efficient, data-driven, and broadly applicable investment process combined with strict risk management gives us a discernable edge. This may sound like an overly prescriptive approach to markets, but as the last several weeks have demonstrated, a clear and coherent investment process is incredibly important when navigating volatile market environments. We can’t control outcomes, but we can meaningfully tilt the probabilities in our favor by sticking to the right process.

We have a defensive investment mindset and a strong emphasis on capital preservation. Sound risk management is imperative in any investment approach - we have no way of consistently predicting the short-term performance of any particular company, sector, or market. We don’t try to, and never will. As the past several weeks have demonstrated, we must be equipped to deal with all kinds of challenging markets and event risk. I believe the best way to mitigate the myriad list of risk factors is through diversification and low net market exposure. I don’t anticipate positioning much less than 30 longs, and 50 shorts, with no single long position being greater than 4% of capital, and no single short position exceeding 2% of capital. We put sensible limits on net exposures to specific sectors and view diversification as imperative to sustainable long-term performance. With a target beta of zero, our intention is to construct a portfolio immunized as much as possible from overall market volatility and produce returns that are uncorrelated to the broader market.

We’re small. As a small & nimble fund, we’re able to navigate much further down the market cap spectrum, where other large manager’s sheer scale and asset size precludes them from doing so. This presents us with a much larger universe of investment opportunities than those limited to large cap stocks. Small and mid-cap issuers are typically much less covered by sell-side research analysts and have lower levels of institutional ownership. These factors lead to a less competitive, and more inefficient market where mispricings are more commonplace and more dramatic.

We invest globally. Rooted in our belief that opportunity set is as important as skill set, we look beyond US equities and cast a wide net across global markets – our investable universe encompasses over 6,000 issuers, the vast majority of which are in developed markets. In our view, foreign markets are more often overlooked by investors and, consequently, are less efficient & less competitive than US markets, presenting lower hanging fruit. As a whole, foreign markets currently present much more compelling valuations than the US. It’s worth noting that, on average, each year out of the past 10 years, 74% of the top 50 performing stocks have been have non-US stocks. By including non-US equities, we expand our list of investment candidates more than four-fold. This wide net approach meaningfully tips the probabilities in our favor of identifying strong outperformers and generating alpha.

Moving Forward

As a nation, we have the resources, know-how, and capability to not only tackle this crisis head on, but emerge as a stronger, more resilient, and more unified country. We remain the destination of choice for the world’s best and brightest and the world leader in technological innovation. The past 100 years have hardly been without crisis in our country, yet we’ve seen living standards rise more than six-fold during that period, despite the many challenges we’ve faced. Equipped with an extraordinarily innovative market system, a highly effective rule of law, and a dynamic entrepreneurial spirit, I have no doubt in our ability to navigate and overcome the challenges we currently face.

Thank you for entrusting me with your hard-earned capital. Please don’t hesitate to reach out with any questions or comments.

Sincerely,

Dave O’Harra

Managing Partner

david.oharra@mclaincap.com

The post McLain Capital 1Q20 letter to investors appeared first on ValueWalk.

Read More

Continue Reading

Government

Survey Shows Declining Concerns Among Americans About COVID-19

Survey Shows Declining Concerns Among Americans About COVID-19

A new survey reveals that only 20% of Americans view covid-19 as "a major threat"…

Published

on

Survey Shows Declining Concerns Among Americans About COVID-19

A new survey reveals that only 20% of Americans view covid-19 as "a major threat" to the health of the US population - a sharp decline from a high of 67% in July 2020.

(SARMDY/Shutterstock)

What's more, the Pew Research Center survey conducted from Feb. 7 to Feb. 11 showed that just 10% of Americans are concerned that they will  catch the disease and require hospitalization.

"This data represents a low ebb of public concern about the virus that reached its height in the summer and fall of 2020, when as many as two-thirds of Americans viewed COVID-19 as a major threat to public health," reads the report, which was published March 7.

According to the survey, half of the participants understand the significance of researchers and healthcare providers in understanding and treating long COVID - however 27% of participants consider this issue less important, while 22% of Americans are unaware of long COVID.

What's more, while Democrats were far more worried than Republicans in the past, that gap has narrowed significantly.

"In the pandemic’s first year, Democrats were routinely about 40 points more likely than Republicans to view the coronavirus as a major threat to the health of the U.S. population. This gap has waned as overall levels of concern have fallen," reads the report.

More via the Epoch Times;

The survey found that three in ten Democrats under 50 have received an updated COVID-19 vaccine, compared with 66 percent of Democrats ages 65 and older.

Moreover, 66 percent of Democrats ages 65 and older have received the updated COVID-19 vaccine, while only 24 percent of Republicans ages 65 and older have done so.

“This 42-point partisan gap is much wider now than at other points since the start of the outbreak. For instance, in August 2021, 93 percent of older Democrats and 78 percent of older Republicans said they had received all the shots needed to be fully vaccinated (a 15-point gap),” it noted.

COVID-19 No Longer an Emergency

The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) recently issued its updated recommendations for the virus, which no longer require people to stay home for five days after testing positive for COVID-19.

The updated guidance recommends that people who contracted a respiratory virus stay home, and they can resume normal activities when their symptoms improve overall and their fever subsides for 24 hours without medication.

“We still must use the commonsense solutions we know work to protect ourselves and others from serious illness from respiratory viruses, this includes vaccination, treatment, and staying home when we get sick,” CDC director Dr. Mandy Cohen said in a statement.

The CDC said that while the virus remains a threat, it is now less likely to cause severe illness because of widespread immunity and improved tools to prevent and treat the disease.

Importantly, states and countries that have already adjusted recommended isolation times have not seen increased hospitalizations or deaths related to COVID-19,” it stated.

The federal government suspended its free at-home COVID-19 test program on March 8, according to a website set up by the government, following a decrease in COVID-19-related hospitalizations.

According to the CDC, hospitalization rates for COVID-19 and influenza diseases remain “elevated” but are decreasing in some parts of the United States.

Tyler Durden Sun, 03/10/2024 - 22:45

Read More

Continue Reading

Government

Rand Paul Teases Senate GOP Leader Run – Musk Says “I Would Support”

Rand Paul Teases Senate GOP Leader Run – Musk Says "I Would Support"

Republican Kentucky Senator Rand Paul on Friday hinted that he may jump…

Published

on

Rand Paul Teases Senate GOP Leader Run - Musk Says "I Would Support"

Republican Kentucky Senator Rand Paul on Friday hinted that he may jump into the race to become the next Senate GOP leader, and Elon Musk was quick to support the idea. Republicans must find a successor for periodically malfunctioning Mitch McConnell, who recently announced he'll step down in November, though intending to keep his Senate seat until his term ends in January 2027, when he'd be within weeks of turning 86. 

So far, the announced field consists of two quintessential establishment types: John Cornyn of Texas and John Thune of South Dakota. While John Barrasso's name had been thrown around as one of "The Three Johns" considered top contenders, the Wyoming senator on Tuesday said he'll instead seek the number two slot as party whip. 

Paul used X to tease his potential bid for the position which -- if the GOP takes back the upper chamber in November -- could graduate from Minority Leader to Majority Leader. He started by telling his 5.1 million followers he'd had lots of people asking him about his interest in running...

...then followed up with a poll in which he predictably annihilated Cornyn and Thune, taking a 96% share as of Friday night, with the other two below 2% each. 

Elon Musk was quick to back the idea of Paul as GOP leader, while daring Cornyn and Thune to follow Paul's lead by throwing their names out for consideration by the Twitter-verse X-verse. 

Paul has been a stalwart opponent of security-state mass surveillance, foreign interventionism -- to include shoveling billions of dollars into the proxy war in Ukraine -- and out-of-control spending in general. He demonstrated the latter passion on the Senate floor this week as he ridiculed the latest kick-the-can spending package:   

In February, Paul used Senate rules to force his colleagues into a grueling Super Bowl weekend of votes, as he worked to derail a $95 billion foreign aid bill. "I think we should stay here as long as it takes,” said Paul. “If it takes a week or a month, I’ll force them to stay here to discuss why they think the border of Ukraine is more important than the US border.”

Don't expect a Majority Leader Paul to ditch the filibuster -- he's been a hardy user of the legislative delay tactic. In 2013, he spoke for 13 hours to fight the nomination of John Brennan as CIA director. In 2015, he orated for 10-and-a-half-hours to oppose extension of the Patriot Act

Rand Paul amid his 10 1/2 hour filibuster in 2015

Among the general public, Paul is probably best known as Capitol Hill's chief tormentor of Dr. Anthony Fauci, who was director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Disease during the Covid-19 pandemic. Paul says the evidence indicates the virus emerged from China's Wuhan Institute of Virology. He's accused Fauci and other members of the US government public health apparatus of evading questions about their funding of the Chinese lab's "gain of function" research, which takes natural viruses and morphs them into something more dangerous. Paul has pointedly said that Fauci committed perjury in congressional hearings and that he belongs in jail "without question."   

Musk is neither the only nor the first noteworthy figure to back Paul for party leader. Just hours after McConnell announced his upcoming step-down from leadership, independent 2024 presidential candidate Robert F. Kennedy, Jr voiced his support: 

In a testament to the extent to which the establishment recoils at the libertarian-minded Paul, mainstream media outlets -- which have been quick to report on other developments in the majority leader race -- pretended not to notice that Paul had signaled his interest in the job. More than 24 hours after Paul's test-the-waters tweet-fest began, not a single major outlet had brought it to the attention of their audience. 

That may be his strongest endorsement yet. 

Tyler Durden Sun, 03/10/2024 - 20:25

Read More

Continue Reading

Government

The Great Replacement Loophole: Illegal Immigrants Score 5-Year Work Benefit While “Waiting” For Deporation, Asylum

The Great Replacement Loophole: Illegal Immigrants Score 5-Year Work Benefit While "Waiting" For Deporation, Asylum

Over the past several…

Published

on

The Great Replacement Loophole: Illegal Immigrants Score 5-Year Work Benefit While "Waiting" For Deporation, Asylum

Over the past several months we've pointed out that there has  been zero job creation for native-born workers since the summer of 2018...

... and that since Joe Biden was sworn into office, most of the post-pandemic job gains the administration continuously brags about have gone foreign-born (read immigrants, mostly illegal ones) workers.

And while the left might find this data almost as verboten as FBI crime statistics - as it directly supports the so-called "great replacement theory" we're not supposed to discuss - it also coincides with record numbers of illegal crossings into the United States under Biden.

In short, the Biden administration opened the floodgates, 10 million illegal immigrants poured into the country, and most of the post-pandemic "jobs recovery" went to foreign-born workers, of which illegal immigrants represent the largest chunk.

Asylum seekers from Venezuela await work permits on June 28, 2023 (via the Chicago Tribune)

'But Tyler, illegal immigrants can't possibly work in the United States whilst awaiting their asylum hearings,' one might hear from the peanut gallery. On the contrary: ever since Biden reversed a key aspect of Trump's labor policies, all illegal immigrants - even those awaiting deportation proceedings - have been given carte blanche to work while awaiting said proceedings for up to five years...

... something which even Elon Musk was shocked to learn.

Which leads us to another question: recall that the primary concern for the Biden admin for much of 2022 and 2023 was soaring prices, i.e., relentless inflation in general, and rising wages in particular, which in turn prompted even Goldman to admit two years ago that the diabolical wage-price spiral had been unleashed in the US (diabolical, because nothing absent a major economic shock, read recession or depression, can short-circuit it once it is in place).

Well, there is one other thing that can break the wage-price spiral loop: a flood of ultra-cheap illegal immigrant workers. But don't take our word for it: here is Fed Chair Jerome Powell himself during his February 60 Minutes interview:

PELLEY: Why was immigration important?

POWELL: Because, you know, immigrants come in, and they tend to work at a rate that is at or above that for non-immigrants. Immigrants who come to the country tend to be in the workforce at a slightly higher level than native Americans do. But that's largely because of the age difference. They tend to skew younger.

PELLEY: Why is immigration so important to the economy?

POWELL: Well, first of all, immigration policy is not the Fed's job. The immigration policy of the United States is really important and really much under discussion right now, and that's none of our business. We don't set immigration policy. We don't comment on it.

I will say, over time, though, the U.S. economy has benefited from immigration. And, frankly, just in the last, year a big part of the story of the labor market coming back into better balance is immigration returning to levels that were more typical of the pre-pandemic era.

PELLEY: The country needed the workers.

POWELL: It did. And so, that's what's been happening.

Translation: Immigrants work hard, and Americans are lazy. But much more importantly, since illegal immigrants will work for any pay, and since Biden's Department of Homeland Security, via its Citizenship and Immigration Services Agency, has made it so illegal immigrants can work in the US perfectly legally for up to 5 years (if not more), one can argue that the flood of illegals through the southern border has been the primary reason why inflation - or rather mostly wage inflation, that all too critical component of the wage-price spiral  - has moderated in in the past year, when the US labor market suddenly found itself flooded with millions of perfectly eligible workers, who just also happen to be illegal immigrants and thus have zero wage bargaining options.

None of this is to suggest that the relentless flood of immigrants into the US is not also driven by voting and census concerns - something Elon Musk has been pounding the table on in recent weeks, and has gone so far to call it "the biggest corruption of American democracy in the 21st century", but in retrospect, one can also argue that the only modest success the Biden admin has had in the past year - namely bringing inflation down from a torrid 9% annual rate to "only" 3% - has also been due to the millions of illegals he's imported into the country.

We would be remiss if we didn't also note that this so often carries catastrophic short-term consequences for the social fabric of the country (the Laken Riley fiasco being only the latest example), not to mention the far more dire long-term consequences for the future of the US - chief among them the trillions of dollars in debt the US will need to incur to pay for all those new illegal immigrants Democrat voters and low-paid workers. This is on top of the labor revolution that will kick in once AI leads to mass layoffs among high-paying, white-collar jobs, after which all those newly laid off native-born workers hoping to trade down to lower paying (if available) jobs will discover that hardened criminals from Honduras or Guatemala have already taken them, all thanks to Joe Biden.

Tyler Durden Sun, 03/10/2024 - 19:15

Read More

Continue Reading

Trending