Connect with us

Is Bitcoin Ready to Rally to the Figurative Moon?

Is Bitcoin Ready to Rally to the Figurative Moon?

Published

on

Bitcoin

Bitcoin is up by almost 55% in the year-to-date period, but that is not the interesting news. The important news is that Bitcoin has pulled off an unexpected rally in the last week, and a recurrent trend in all of the latest bitcoin analysis is that the cryptocurrency might be off to another 2017-like rally to the moon.

Get The Full Seth Klarman Series in PDF

Get the entire 10-part series on Seth Klarman in PDF. Save it to your desktop, read it on your tablet, or email to your colleagues.

Q2 2020 hedge fund letters, conferences and more

The recent rally is unexpected because Bitcoin’s performance has been mostly tepid since the start of the year. For one, the expectations of a safe-haven rally in response to the COVID-19 pandemic failed to materialize. Also, much of the bullish sentiment about a post-halving rally appeared to be priced in and the post-halving rally didn’t happen.

However, the recent gains suggest that the safe-haven sentiments around bitcoin might be right after all. For one, Bitcoin’s 54% YTD gains more than doubles the 25% gains that gold has recorded and the 21% gains in the tech-heavy NASDAQ index in the same period. Bitcoin’s price rally has also dwarfed the practically flat performance of the S&P 500 in the same period.

Bitcoin

The bullish case for Bitcoin

One of the factors driving the rally in Bitcoin and the rest of the crypto market was news from last Wednesday indicating that the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) might be pushing out a policy that empowers banks to engage in crypto-related activities.

An unnamed national bank wrote to the OCC requesting clarity on whether banks are permitted to provide cryptocurrency custodial services. The OCC wrote back that indeed banks can provide custodial crypto services, stating that, “a national bank may provide these cryptocurrency custody services on behalf of customers, including by holding the unique cryptographic keys associated with cryptocurrency.” The OCC also reaffirmed that banks are permitted to offer their services to any lawful business they choose, including cryptocurrency businesses.

For the most part, especially after the 2017 ICO craze, traditional financial institutions have largely avoided cryptocurrency-related businesses because of a lack of regulatory clarity. This letter from the OCC now provides much-needed clarity and it suggests that there’s not much of a regulatory obstacle preventing traditional financial institutions from supporting crypto businesses.

Another rational explanation for Bitcoin’s recent rally is that the world is now starting to come to terms with the realities of an uncertain economic environment as the COVID19 pandemic continues to rage on with the possibility of a second wave.

U.S. equities have largely forged ahead and unperturbed by COVID19, all thanks to generous stimulus packages and other pro-business government policies. However, the increasing number of cases, the high chance of a second wave, and the political uncertainties of an election year are starting to dawn on investors and gold, the de facto safe-haven asset has been on a solid rally over the past several weeks.

Bitcoin

Bitcoin has always been regarded as the digital equivalent of gold; hence, it shouldn’t be surprising that Bitcoin’s rally has started to rhyme with the rally in gold. Coincidentally, data provider Glassnode has reported that the number of Bitcoin whales or wallet addresses with more than $1 million in Bitcoin has increased by 40% in the last 2 months to match the rally in gold.

Is there a correction on the horizon?

Bitcoin has had a series of false starts and failed attempts to repeat the historical rally that it had in 2017. Hence, there are still valid fears that the current rally might be short-lived and that a correction is around the corner.

To start with, some key indicators used in technical analysis suggest that the rally is already overextended at Bitcoin’s trading price around $11,600. One such indicator is the funding rate, which compels holders of long or short Bitcoin futures contracts to pay a fee once every eight hours based on the prevailing market sentiment.

Bitcoin

A positive funding rate of Bitcoin perpetual swaps suggests that the majority of the market is long on BTC’s price while a negative funding rate suggests that the market sentiment is short on Bitcoin.

However, the funding rate in the last few days suggests that the market is overwhelmingly bullish, but it also exposes Bitcoin to the risk of a long squeeze. Also, when considered from a contrarian perspective, one could also argue that the high funding rate of perpetual swaps will be potentially unsustainable in the short term.

Final words

The cryptocurrency market is incredibly volatile and Bitcoin if often the driving force behind much of that volatility. Right now, Bitcoin is enjoying a bullish rally and the general cryptocurrency market is trending up. The OCC’s letter reaffirming that banks can support legit crypto businesses suggests that traditional financial institutions will start to take a more active role in facilitating the purchase of and providing custodial services to cryptocurrencies.

One of the potential benefits of the intentional participation of banks in crypto services is that regular investors will start considering Bitcoin as money or a money equivalent. In the long term, the involvement of traditional financial institutions in the crypto space could potentially unlock the mass-market adoption of cryptocurrencies. In the short term, only time will tell if the current rally will be short-lived or not.

The post Is Bitcoin Ready to Rally to the Figurative Moon? appeared first on ValueWalk.

Read More

Continue Reading

Spread & Containment

License Plates Could Be Printed On McDonald’s Bags To Stop Littering

License Plates Could Be Printed On McDonald’s Bags To Stop Littering

There’s been talk about McDonald’s in southwest Great Britain could print…

Published

on

License Plates Could Be Printed On McDonald's Bags To Stop Littering

There's been talk about McDonald's in southwest Great Britain could print car license plates on drive-thru bags to prevent customers from littering. 

"It's not clear exactly how the number plate would be printed on packaging, but it could be scanned onto the brown bags that contain the food," Daily Mail noted. 

Chris Howell, Swansea Council's head of waste, parks and cleansing, told a climate change corporate delivery committee meeting: 

"The Welsh Government has explored with McDonald's, or their franchises, whether or not they could print number plates of cars collecting takeaways from their drive-throughs with a view that that would discourage people from discarding their materials (litter)."

Howell said one of the biggest hurdles with fast-food companies is that if one chain adopts the climate initiative, customers will go to competitors that don't print license plates on bags. 

"If McDonald's do it, then people will just go to Burger King instead of McDonald's, because nobody wants to have their private details printed on that packaging." He added: "I think it's a really good idea but at the minute it's fraught with some difficulties." 

The nationalist political party in Wales, Plaid Cymru, first proposed the idea more than two years ago during the pandemic lockdown when party leaders noticed a spike in fast-food trash along city streets and highways. 

Welsh Government spokesperson told MailOnline:

"There are no current plans to introduce a requirement for drive-through restaurants to add vehicle registration details to fast food drive-through packaging.

"We are continuing to support Keep Wales Tidy with other initiatives to tackle roadside litter including their No Regrets campaign and their Adopt a Highway initiative."

Now 'the cat is out of the bag'. It's only a matter of time before governments start forcing fast-food companies to print license plate numbers on drive-thru bags. The dangers of this could be more surveillance, and who knows what corporations would do with license plate data if such a system were implemented. 

Tyler Durden Sat, 11/26/2022 - 18:00

Read More

Continue Reading

Uncategorized

Energy is the master resource but it could be Bitcoin that reigns supreme

Nothing shines a light on the importance of energy as much as a fast-approaching winter.
The post Energy is the master resource but it could be Bitcoin…

Published

on

Nothing shines a light on the importance of energy as much as a fast-approaching winter. When the temperature drops, the scarcity of energy becomes obvious and global efforts to preserve it begin.

This year, the fight for energy is more aggressive than it’s ever been.

The fiscal and monetary policies set in place during the COVID-19 pandemic caused dangerous inflation in almost every country in the world. The quantitative easing that set out to curb the consequences of the pandemic resulted in a historically unprecedented increase in the M2 money supply. This decision diluted the purchasing power and led to an increase in energy prices, sparking a crisis that is set to culminate this winter.

CryptoSlate analysis showed that the E.U. will most likely be the one hit the hardest by the energy crisis.

The European Central Bank (ECB) has been struggling to keep core inflation down this year. The Core Consumer Price Index (CPI) began to increase substantially in 2021 due to the pandemic both in the U.S. and the E.U.

The U.S. has seen its Core CPI decrease sharply since its culmination in February and posted better-than-expected results last month. However, Core CPI in the Eurozone has continued to increase throughout the year and currently shows no sign of stopping.

Graph showing the Core CPI in the U.S. and the Eurozone from 2017 to 2022 (Source: The Daily Shot)

A similar increase in Core CPI can also be seen in Japan and the U.K. One of the factors that may have contributed to their monetary instability is a lack of investment and support for commodities like oil and gas. Widespread efforts to switch to renewable sources of energy led to a decrease in oil and gas purchases in the E.U. and the U.K.

In contrast, the U.S. and Russia have been investing heavily in oil and gas and promoting innovation in the field.

Looking at the value of fiat currencies against the U.S. dollar further confirms this impact.

The Russian Ruble and the DXY have both increased in value in the past two years, while the euro, British Pound, and Japanese Yen have all seen their Dollar value decrease.

global fiat currencies
Graph showing DXY, GBP, EUR, JPY, and RUB and their value against the U.S. dollar (Source: TradingView)

With rising inflation and a seriously weakened currency, the E.U. will have a hard time competing for oil and gas on the global market. Natural gas producers warned that almost all long-term contracts for natural gas coming out of the U.S. have been sold out until 2026. Until then, when a new wave of natural gas supply is expected to come, the E.U. will have to compete with Asia for the limited supply and swallow the high gas price.

All of this uncertainty could have a positive effect on Bitcoin. While the broader crypto market struggles to remain afloat after the FTX fallout, Bitcoin has positioned itself as a pillar of stability in a market plagued with bad actors. Devalued fiat currencies could push retail investors away from safe-haven assets like gold and commodities and towards an asset like Bitcoin.

The post Energy is the master resource but it could be Bitcoin that reigns supreme appeared first on CryptoSlate.

Read More

Continue Reading

Government

‘Forgetful’ Fauci Could Not Recall Key Details Of COVID Crisis Response During Deposition: Louisiana AG

‘Forgetful’ Fauci Could Not Recall Key Details Of COVID Crisis Response During Deposition: Louisiana AG

Authored by Zachary Stieber via The…

Published

on

'Forgetful' Fauci Could Not Recall Key Details Of COVID Crisis Response During Deposition: Louisiana AG

Authored by Zachary Stieber via The Epoch Times (emphasis ours),

Dr. Anthony Fauci said he could not recall key details about his actions during the COVID-19 pandemic, according to one of the officials who questioned him on Nov. 23.

Dr. Anthony Fauci, director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, speaks in Washington on May 11, 2022. (Alex Wong/Getty Images)

Fauci, the director National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) since 1984 and President Joe Biden’s chief medical adviser, was deposed by Louisiana Attorney General Jeff Landry and Missouri Attorney General Eric Schmitt, both Republicans.

“It was amazing, literally, that we spent seven hours with Dr. Fauci—this is a man who single-handedly wrecked the U.S. economy based upon ‘the science, follow the science.’ And over the course of seven hours, we discovered that he can’t recall practically anything dealing with his COVID response,” Landry told The Epoch Times after leaving the deposition. “He just said, ‘I can’t recall, I haven’t seen that. And I think we need to put these documents into context,'” Landry added.

“It was extremely troubling to realize that this is a man who advises presidents of the United States and yet couldn’t recall information he put out, information he discussed, press conferences he held dealing with the COVID-19 response,” Landry added later.

Fauci and NIAID did not immediately respond to requests for comment.

Landry declined to provide more details about the deposition until it is made public, which will happen at a future date. But he said officials would be able to take some of what they learned to advance their case.

Landry and Schmitt sued the U.S. government in May, alleging it violated people’s First Amendment rights by pressuring big tech companies to censor speech. Documents produced by the government in response bolstered the claims. U.S. District Judge Terry Doughty, the Trump appointee overseeing the case, recently ordered Fauci and seven other officials to testify under oath about their knowledge of the censorship.

Doughty concluded that plaintiffs showed Fauci “has personal knowledge about the issue concerning censorship across social media as it related to COVID-19 and ancillary issues of COVID-19.”

While Fauci qualified as a high-ranking official, the burden of him being deposed was outweighed by the court’s need for information before ruling on a motion for a preliminary injunction, Doughty said.

Wednesday was the first time Fauci testified under oath about his interactions with big tech firms, including Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg.

Before the deposition, Landry said in a statement, “We all deserve to know how involved Dr. Fauci was in the censorship of the American people during the COVID pandemic; tomorrow, I hope to find out.”

“We’re going to follow the evidence everywhere it goes to get down to exactly what has happened, to get down to the fact that our government used private entities to suppress the speech of Americans,” Landry told The Epoch Times.

Louisiana Attorney General Jeff Landry (C) speaks during a press conference at the U.S. Capitol in Washington, on Jan. 22, 2020. (Drew Angerer/Getty Images)

Great Barrington Declaration

Jenin Younes with the New Civil Liberties Alliance, another lawyer representing plaintiffs in the case, said that Fauci claimed he did not worry about a document called the Great Barrington Declaration.

Penned in October 2020, the document called for focused protection on people most at-risk from COVID-19 while rescinding the harsh restrictions that had been imposed on children and others at little risk from the disease. Two of its authors, Dr. Jay Bhattacharya and Martin Kulldorff, are plaintiffs in the case.

I have a very busy day job running a six billion dollar institute. I don’t have time to worry about things like the Great Barrington Declaration,” Fauci said, according to Younes.

Fauci, though, has spoken multiple times about the declaration.

In internal emails that were later published, Fauci and Dr. Francis Collins, Fauci’s former boss, both criticized the declaration. “There needs to be a quick and devastating published takedown of its premises,” Collins wrote, prompting Fauci to send him a Wired magazine article he claimed “debunks this theory.”

In another missive, obtained by The Epoch Times through a Freedom of Information Act request, Fauci said the declaration reminded him of AIDS denialism.

Fauci also talked about the declaration in public, including defending his criticism during a congressional hearing in May.

I have come out very strongly publicly against the Great Barrington Declaration,” Fauci wrote to Dr. Deborah Birx in another email.

Other Depositions

The government moved to block some of the depositions, but not Fauci’s. It just won an order blocking the depositions of Surgeon General Vivek Murthy, Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Director Jen Easterly, and Rob Flaherty, a deputy assistant to Biden.

Similar efforts to block the depositions of former White House press secretary Jen Psaki and FBI official Elvis Chan have been unsuccessful.

Chan is scheduled to answer questions next week. Psaki is scheduled to be deposed on Dec. 8.

Chan was involved in communicating with Facebook, LinkedIn, and other big tech firms about content moderation, according to evidence developed in the case and public statements he’s made. Psaki publicly said while still in the White House that platforms should step up against alleged mis- and disinformation.

Plaintiffs have already deposed several officials including Daniel Kimmage, an official at the State Department’s Global Engagement Center.

That center worked with Easterly’s agency to create a coalition of nonprofits called the Election Integrity Partnership, which pushed social media companies to censor speech.

Kimmage was also responsible for meetings during which censorship was discussed, with State Department official Samaruddin Stewart acting on his orders, according to documents produced by LinkedIn.

Read more here...

Tyler Durden Sat, 11/26/2022 - 13:30

Read More

Continue Reading

Trending